110:
accountants, on 25 July 2006. The employees were made redundant on 26 July 2006. On 27 July 2006, the business was sold as a going concern and the employees were engaged again. In August, there was a creditors meeting and
Deloitte accountants were appointed as liquidators. The employees wanted
118:
regulation 7, ‘at the time of the transfer’ the transferor was subject to ‘insolvency proceedings’. So, it held that TUPER 2006 regulation 4 was excluded and the
National Insurance fund was liable for debts under
143:
section 388(1)(a) makes it plain that one has to be appointed as a liquidator before one is. So at the transfer’s time there was no insolvency proceeding ‘under the supervision of an insolvency practitioner’.
94:
case, concerning the effects of a business transfer on an employee's rights at work. If the company goes into voluntary liquidation, and the business is sold before the final disposal of assets, then
131:
Elias J held the company did not get out of arrears for pay. The liquidation of the transferor happened as a result of the creditors’ voluntary liquidation. According to the definition in
202:
123:
section 182. The
Secretary of State appealed arguing that though there were insolvency proceedings, they were not existing ‘at the time of the relevant transfer’.
353:
487:
336:
492:
173:
429:
305:
189:
413:
275:
310:
373:
343:
368:
383:
166:
261:
192:
217:
159:
447:
231:
358:
17:
403:
326:
295:
251:
207:
418:
87:
49:
433:
279:
265:
387:
481:
458:
443:
91:
235:
221:
151:
400:
323:
292:
248:
136:
115:
95:
135:
section 183(3)(a) that did not commence until after the transfer. Therefore
106:
An insolvent company was going into voluntary liquidation, with the help of
396:
319:
288:
244:
132:
120:
107:
140:
155:
204:
69:
61:
56:
44:
36:
31:
83:Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Slater
32:Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Slater
167:
8:
174:
160:
152:
28:
338:Spijkers v Gebroeders Benedik Abattoir CV
354:Süzen v Zehnacker Gebaeudereingung GmbH
7:
430:Oakland v Wellswood (Yorkshire) Ltd
306:Parkwood Leisure Ltd v Alemo-Herron
190:Transfers of Undertakings Directive
414:SS for Trade and Industry v Slater
25:
18:SS for Trade and Industry v Slater
488:Employment Appeal Tribunal cases
276:University of Oxford v Humphreys
493:2007 in United Kingdom case law
182:Transfer of undertaking sources
114:The Tribunal held that, under
1:
384:RCO Support Services v Unison
98:regulation 8 does not apply.
139:regulation 8 did not apply.
369:Oy Liikenne Ab v Liskojärvi
509:
262:Credit Suisse Ltd v Lister
40:Employment Appeal Tribunal
440:
426:
410:
394:
380:
365:
350:
333:
317:
302:
286:
272:
258:
242:
228:
214:
200:
187:
74:
218:Litster v Forth Dry Dock
75:Business transfer, TUPE
232:Wilson v St Helens BC
448:business transfers
454:
453:
79:
78:
16:(Redirected from
500:
339:
205:
176:
169:
162:
153:
111:arrears of pay.
57:Court membership
29:
21:
508:
507:
503:
502:
501:
499:
498:
497:
478:
477:
472:
467:
455:
450:
436:
422:
406:
390:
376:
361:
346:
337:
329:
313:
298:
282:
268:
254:
238:
224:
210:
203:
196:
183:
180:
150:
129:
104:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
506:
504:
496:
495:
490:
480:
479:
476:
475:
471:
468:
466:
463:
462:
461:
452:
451:
441:
438:
437:
427:
424:
423:
411:
408:
407:
395:
392:
391:
381:
378:
377:
366:
363:
362:
351:
348:
347:
334:
331:
330:
318:
315:
314:
303:
300:
299:
291:arts 3(3) and
287:
284:
283:
273:
270:
269:
259:
256:
255:
243:
240:
239:
229:
226:
225:
215:
212:
211:
201:
198:
197:
188:
185:
184:
181:
179:
178:
171:
164:
156:
149:
146:
128:
125:
103:
100:
77:
76:
72:
71:
67:
66:
63:
59:
58:
54:
53:
46:
42:
41:
38:
34:
33:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
505:
494:
491:
489:
486:
485:
483:
474:
473:
469:
464:
460:
459:UK labour law
457:
456:
449:
445:
444:UK labour law
439:
435:
434:EWCA Civ 1094
432:
431:
425:
420:
416:
415:
409:
405:
402:
398:
393:
389:
386:
385:
379:
375:
371:
370:
364:
360:
356:
355:
349:
345:
341:
340:
332:
328:
325:
321:
316:
312:
308:
307:
301:
297:
294:
290:
285:
281:
280:EWCA Civ 3050
278:
277:
271:
267:
266:EWCA Civ 1551
264:
263:
257:
253:
250:
246:
241:
237:
234:
233:
227:
223:
220:
219:
213:
209:
206:
199:
194:
191:
186:
177:
172:
170:
165:
163:
158:
157:
154:
147:
145:
142:
138:
134:
126:
124:
122:
117:
112:
109:
101:
99:
97:
93:
92:UK labour law
89:
85:
84:
73:
68:
64:
62:Judge sitting
60:
55:
51:
47:
43:
39:
35:
30:
27:
19:
428:
412:
388:EWCA Civ 464
382:
367:
352:
335:
304:
274:
260:
230:
216:
130:
113:
105:
82:
81:
80:
26:
322:arts 1 and
482:Categories
470:References
417:IRLR 928 (
401:TUPER 2006
399:art 5 and
324:TUPER 2006
293:TUPER 2006
249:TUPER 2006
247:art 5 and
193:2001/23/EC
137:TUPER 2006
116:TUPER 2006
96:TUPER 2006
86:IRLR 928 (
48:IRLR 928 (
397:TUD 2001
374:C-172/99
320:TUD 2001
311:C-426/11
289:TUD 2001
245:TUD 2001
195:arts 3-4
148:See also
133:ERA 1996
127:Judgment
121:ERA 1996
108:Deloitte
70:Keywords
45:Citation
372:(2001)
359:C-13/95
357:(1997)
344:C-24/85
342:(1986)
309:(2013)
236:UKHL 37
222:UKHL 10
141:IA 1986
90:) is a
65:Elias J
465:Notes
102:Facts
37:Court
446:and
442:see
419:EAT
404:r 8
327:r 3
296:r 5
252:r 4
208:r 7
88:EAT
50:EAT
484::
421:)
175:e
168:t
161:v
52:)
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.