44:
Where the appellant is undefended, he is entitled to be informed of this right; a failure to do so is a misdirection or irregularity on the part of the presiding judicial officer.
77:
61:
26:
51:
held that insofar as an irregularity has been committed, it had not been so fundamental as to vitiate the trial proceedings.
37:
have a duty to inform an unrepresented accused of his legal rights, which include the right to the docket or State
34:
48:
71:
23:
38:
30:
41:' statements, unless there is a ground for refusal.
8:
7:
14:
78:South African criminal case law
1:
47:In this case, however, the
94:
22:, an important case in
60:S v Shiburi 2004 (2)
27:criminal procedure
35:judicial officers
85:
93:
92:
88:
87:
86:
84:
83:
82:
68:
67:
57:
12:
11:
5:
91:
89:
81:
80:
70:
69:
66:
65:
56:
53:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
90:
79:
76:
75:
73:
63:
59:
58:
54:
52:
50:
45:
42:
40:
36:
32:
28:
25:
24:South African
21:
20:
49:appeal court
46:
43:
18:
17:
15:
19:S v Shiburi
55:References
33:held that
39:witnesses
72:Category
64:314 (W)
29:, the
31:court
62:SACR
16:In
74::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.