224:
December 1984, when
Samynathan's friend Suppiah Arumugam, who was in charge of supplying labourers to the ice factory, was together with three friends at Tanjong Pagar Plaza when Kumar and some other men confronted Suppiah about a gold chain he snatched, and this caused Suppiah to be assaulted. The second was on 22 April 1985, when Samynathan got into a fight with Jabar at Tanjong Pagar Road, and Jabar's left palm was slashed as a result. Six days later, on 28 April 1985, the date of the murder, the eight perpetrators of the case decided during a drinks session that they should attack Suppiah and his friends to seek vengeance against them for Jabar's injury. Afterwards, the eight men were armed with metal poles, axes, swords and parangs and headed to the ice factory to attack Suppiah and his friends. At that time, Suppiah was not present at the factory, and only Samynathan and his two friends were present, and they were thus targeted and brutally attacked, leading to Samynathan's death and one of his friends seriously injured. All three accused were later called to enter their defence, after the trial court ruled that there was a case to answer, and they put up a defence that they never intended to cause death, and their only intention was to attack Suppiah and not the others, and they were provoked into fighting Samynathan and the others, while the death of Samynathan was caused during a fight. On these grounds, the defence sought to have their clients ruled not guilty of murder. The judgement was reserved on 2 December 1988.
228:
defendants and their other five accomplices had a common intention to cause grievous hurt to
Suppiah and his friends, including Samynathan, for having assaulted and injured Jabar in an earlier dispute. In turn, the judges rejected the trio's defence that they were only going after Suppiah and wanted to harm only Suppiah. Judicial Commissioner Chao also pointed out that the trio and the other offenders were the ones that took undue advantage of the situation, and hence their defences of sudden fight and provocation were rejected. He also stated that while the trio were not the ones who inflicted the fatal wounds on Samynathan, they were considered to have committed the crime of murder due to the legal doctrine of common intention, since the lethal injuries inflicted on Samynathan were done intentionally and in furtherance of the common intention shared by all the eight perpetrators behind the attack that cost Samynathan his life.
324:, who found that Jabar was entirely responsible for the delay in his execution and he had not proven that it was illegal and unconstitutional to delay his execution until five years after his sentencing, and while an offender had open access to any legal means available to him, the events and circumstances between the time of his conviction and the scheduled time of his execution should also be taken into account. Aside from dismissing Jabar's grounds of appeal, Judicial Commissioner Kan stepped aside to acknowledge that it was unconstitutional to carry an offender's death sentence if the delay in executing the offender was prolonged and unreasonable on the part of the authorities, and this was affirmed in a precedent case by the
201:, who heard their cases in a separate court, decided to sentence both Ganesan and Abdul Gaffur to six years of imprisonment each. He stated that the attack was a disproportionate reaction to the earlier dispute that left one of their friends hurt, and there could have been better ways to mediate the conflict. Justice Chan also added that he accepted that both Abdul Ghaffur and Ganesan had no intention to cause death, even though they wielded lethal weapons that were capable of causing serious injury or death, and he took into consideration the fact that the pair had been drinking alcohol prior to the attack, which may have influenced their decision to tag along with their other six accomplices to wallop Suppiah.
392:
wish to be ordained as a monk. The monks of the temple were eventually granted permission to conduct the rites, and Kumar was thus converted as a monk inside prison, and he was believed to be the first prisoner to be ordained as a monk while on death row. It was also reported that after he became a monk, Kumar, who was given a
Buddhist name "Dao Ren" (道忍 Dào Rěn), refrained from eating meat, and he turned to vegetarian food, eating one meal per day. As Kumar's daily prison meals were the same as the other inmates, Kumar was allowed to give away all the meat included in his food and he would keep the vegetarian ones for himself.
356:
mandatory death penalty for all cases of murder, and once the death penalty was confirmed by the Court of Appeal, there was no discretion for the
Singaporean courts to decide if the sentence of death should be delayed or commuted. Chief Justice Yong also acknowledged that it was indeed unacceptable for a person to death row to spend a prolonged time of imprisonment before execution, and there was no doubt they would feel a certain amount of anguish and mental agony while awaiting execution, and this was an inevitable consequence which death row inmates had to face and it did not have any bearing on their constitutional rights.
407:
Yeou argued that his clemency petition was rejected only two years after he filed it and he also spent five years on death row, more than three times the average stay on death row, and his death sentence should be ruled unconstitutional, which were similar to Jabar's case. However, the motion was rejected on similar grounds as Jabar's case. Yee, together with his three accomplices (Melvin Seet, Tan Siew Chay and Ng Teo Chye) were hanged two days later on 8 June 1995. A fifth man, Tan Siang Leng, was initially also convicted but in the end, he was acquitted upon his appeal and released at that point.
125:, alias Chelia Dorai, was attacked by eight men who sought revenge against one of Samynathan's friends, who hurt one of the attackers in an earlier fight, and Samynathan died as a result of grievous injuries sustained from the attack. Out of the eight murderers, only five were caught and charged with murder, while the remaining three perpetrators went on the run till today. Out of the five, two of the attackers -
169:
and another three people were all said to be
Malaysians, and they were accused of being members of an unlawful assembly and having a common object of causing grievous hurt to Samynathan, which thus resulted in Samynathan's death. However, the remaining three perpetrators behind the case were not identified, and they were never caught. If found guilty of murder under Singaporean law, the five men would be
351:, and it was not in the court's ability to fulfill such an outcome, and on this ground alone, they decided to dismiss Jabar's appeal. Given that Jabar's defence counsel raised several precedent cases from India to support his appeal, Chief Justice Yong, who pronounced the decision in court, ruled that these cases were irrelevant, and he said that unlike Singapore, India prescribes either the
399:. After the executions, Kumar was given a funeral in accordance to Buddhist rites, and Kumar's family, including his elderly mother and relatives, attended the funeral and they did not object to Kumar's decision to become a monk. The monks arranged for Kumar to be cremated after the funeral wake, and his ashes would be scattered in the sea.
161:, at least two workers were attacked by a group of armed men at their workplace, and they were seriously injured as a result of the attack; the two men were said to have been struck by an axe. One of the men, identified as 38-year-old Samynathan Pawathai, died in hospital while the remaining victim survived with timely medical intervention.
391:
since 1993, and he also showed remorse for murdering
Samynathan back in 1985. A senior monk of Poh Toh Si Temple, who often held Buddhist sessions in Changi Prison, stated that Kumar spent his time on death row to study Buddhism and in 1994, a year before he was scheduled to hang, Kumar expressed his
355:
or life imprisonment (with or without the possibility of parole) for murder, and it was up to the Indian courts as legally bound to decide whether or not the prolonged delays in carrying out an execution warranted the commutation of a death sentence to life imprisonment, while
Singapore warranted the
273:
for clemency, while the third appellant, Chandran
Gangatharan, did not petition for clemency. Subsequently, after several delays throughout the next three years, Kumar informed the prison authorities in March 1994 that he decided to not proceed with his clemency application, which left Jabar the sole
359:
With the dismissal of his appeal, Jabar effectively lost his final bid to escape the gallows, and soon after, a third death warrant was given and Jabar was scheduled to be put to death on 28 April 1995, which coincided with the tenth death anniversary of
Samynathan, and at the same time, both Kumar
313:
argued that the delay was not done in any part from the authorities, and Jabar was to blame for the delay since he took more than five years to use up any legal means to delay his execution and his actions were tantamount to an abuse of the court processes, and he also spent time with his family to
223:
The trial court was told that prior to
Samynathan's murder, the three defendants of the trial, as well as Ganesan, Abdul Ghaffur and the missing three accomplices were involved in previous physical altercations with Samynathan and friends, which led to the killing of Samynathan. The first was on 27
168:
Within a day after the crime, the police managed to round up five suspects allegedly responsible for Samynathan's murder, and the five men - Abdul Ghaffur Parith Mohamed Kassim, Chandran Gangatharan, Kumar Nadison, Jabar Kadermastan and S. Ganesan Shanmugam - were charged with murder. The five men
406:
In the aftermath of his execution, Jabar's constitutional challenge became a landmark case in Singapore's legal history, where it concerned the substantive review of legislation by the court and constitution. The case was first reportedly cited on 6 June 1995, when a drug trafficker named Yee Kim
227:
On 11 May 1989, Judicial Commissioner Chao Hick Tin and Justice L P Thean delivered their verdict. Judicial Commissioner Chao, who pronounced the judgement in court, stated that there was a clear intention by all the eight members of the gang to initiate an attack out of revenge, and the three
164:
An autopsy was later conducted by Dr Wee Keng Poh, a forensic pathologist, and he found that Samynathan suffered a total of 18 injuries on his body, and one of the slash wounds had penetrated his liver and led to a massive loss of blood, and his opinion was that the wound was sufficient in the
332:"The prolonged anguish of alternating hope and despair, the agony of uncertainty, the consequences of such suffering on the mental, emotional and physical integrity and health of the individual can render the decision to execute the sentence of death an inhuman and degrading punishment."
347:, and Judges of Appeal L P Thean (Thean Lip Ping) and M Karthigesu, rejected Jabar's appeal. They affirmed Judicial Commissioner Kan's verdict and stated that the President of Singapore had the sole prerogative to decide whether to commute an offender's death sentence to
289:
was granted. Jabar was also allowed to make a fourth clemency appeal and it was submitted on 27 August 1994, and after another two months, President Ong rejected the fourth clemency motion on 25 October 1994, making Jabar to lose another chance of escaping the gallows.
274:
member of the trio to continue with his clemency process. Jabar's first plea for clemency was submitted through his sister on 29 July 1991, and a second one was also filed on 1 August 1991 and a third petition was launched on 13 July 1993. Ultimately, President
189:
On 31 October 1988, both 25-year-old Abdul Ghaffur Parith Mohamed Kassim and 28-year-old S. Ganesan Shanmugam pleaded guilty to lesser charges of manslaughter, after the murder charges against them were dropped, which allowed them to no longer face the
305:, and the triple executions were therefore postponed for the second time while Jabar's appeal was pending before the courts. Jabar's defence lawyer S. K. Kumar argued that it was unconstitutional to hang Jabar after he spent more than five years on
410:
Since then, the remaining three killers involved in Samynathan's death were never caught as of today. Both Abdul Ghaffur and Ganesan, who were sentenced to six years in prison for manslaughter in this case, were released since 1991.
278:
decided to not grant Jabar clemency and rejected his plea on 7 June 1994. A death warrant was finalized and Jabar, together with Chandran and Kumar, were scheduled to be executed on 17 June 1994.
364:, having received news of the upcoming triple executions, appealed to the Singapore government to stay their executions and commute their death sentences to life imprisonment.
1407:
559:
285:
from the President, after his lawyers raised the fact that Kumar submitted an affidavit to assume responsibility for having caused the fatal wounds on Samynathan, and a
1349:
1109:
829:
649:
499:
1079:
889:
709:
529:
298:
After Jabar Kadermastan lost his fourth clemency plea, a second death warrant was issued, scheduling for Jabar and his two accomplices to hang on 11 November 1994.
1139:
231:
Therefore, all the three accused - 32-year-old Kumar Nadison, 27-year-old Jabar Kadermastan and 26-year-old Chandran Gangatharan - were found guilty of murder and
589:
1289:
1259:
1229:
1199:
448:
1402:
1397:
194:
for murdering Samynathan Pawathai, while the remaining three perpetrators were confirmed to stand trial for murder in a separate court session on the same day.
949:
679:
209:
The murder trial of Chandran Gangatharan, Jabar Kadermastan and Kumar Nadison took place on 31 October 1988. The trial was presided over by two trial judges -
1049:
919:
859:
799:
769:
739:
619:
165:
ordinary course of nature to cause death. Following the death of Samynathan, the police classified the case as murder and conducted their investigations.
383:
One of the death row perpetrators, Kumar, gained media attention in a different manner compared to Jabar after the hanging. During his incarceration on
1412:
1006:
999:
1387:
380:
awaiting their executions, and they did not file any additional appeals with regards to their case, even after their execution date had been set.
1417:
395:
On the Friday morning of 28 April 1995, the three murderers - Kumar Nadison, Jabar Kadermastan and Chandran Gangatharan - were hanged in
1382:
176:
In April 1986, after a pre-trial conference, the district court ordered all the five men to stand trial at the High Court for murder.
1319:
1169:
1023:
420:
232:
191:
170:
146:
551:
348:
1341:
1101:
821:
641:
491:
1071:
881:
701:
269:
Subsequently, two of the appellants, Kumar Nadison and Jabar Kadermastan, turned to one final recourse of appealing to the
1392:
521:
1377:
1131:
974:
337:
248:
581:
1312:"Singapore: Further information on imminent execution: Jaber Kadermastan, Chandran A/L Gangatharan, Kumar A/L Nadison"
1281:
1251:
1221:
1191:
440:
352:
941:
671:
1041:
911:
851:
791:
761:
731:
341:
256:
611:
266:
and Goh Joon Seng heard the case, and they agreed with the trial court's decision to convict the trio of murder.
478:
302:
210:
1003:
325:
270:
400:
361:
340:
to review Judicial Commissioner Kan's ruling. On 24 February 1995, the three-judge panel, consisting of
318:
214:
376:
against his sentence, the remaining two murderers, Chandran Gangatharan and Kumar Nadison, remained on
309:
since his sentencing, regardless of whoever was responsible for the delay. However, the prosecutor
50:
403:
also confirmed in May 1995 that the trio were put to death as scheduled in their death warrants.
1162:"Singapore: imminent execution: Jaber Kadermastan, Chandran A/L Gangatharan, Kumar A/L Nadison"
286:
255:
of the trio against their convictions and sentences for the murder of Samynathan Pawathai.
1311:
1161:
1010:
275:
995:
198:
1371:
396:
344:
321:
282:
259:
217:
263:
17:
158:
118:
64:
149:. The trio were hanged on 28 April 1995 after all their appeals were rejected.
310:
360:
Nadison and Chandran Gangatharan were due to hang on the same date as Jabar.
384:
377:
306:
68:
301:
On 10 November 1994, the eve of his execution, Jabar filed a motion to the
388:
236:
133:- were each jailed six years for manslaughter, while the other three -
373:
252:
1002:, 1 S.L.R.(R.) 326, C.A. (Singapore), archived from
882:"Tiga dihukum mati kerana bunuh pekerja kilang air batu"
971:
Chandran a/l Gangatharan and others v Public Prosecutor
475:
Public Prosecutor v Chandran a/l Gangatharan and Others
1102:"Death row man's appeal on grounds of delay rejected"
822:"Death for three who killed worker in revenge attack"
336:
Subsequently, Jabar brought his case forward to the
107:
99:
91:
83:
75:
57:
39:
32:
1342:"Death-row trafficker fails in llth-hour appeal"
145:- were found guilty of murdering Samynathan and
27:1985 murder of a ice factory worker in Singapore
1072:"5-year lapse: Death row man seeks a reprieve"
8:
372:During the time while Jabar Kadermastan was
1024:"Singapore murderer appeals death sentence"
987:
985:
983:
1408:Malaysian people convicted of manslaughter
992:Jabar bin Kadermastan v. Public Prosecutor
281:However, Jabar successfully applied for a
29:
205:Murder trial of Chandran, Jabar and Kumar
317:In the end, the motion was dismissed by
293:
470:
468:
466:
432:
314:push for clemency on several attempts.
157:On 28 April 1985, at an ice factory in
117:On 28 April 1985, at his workplace in
213:judge L P Thean (Thean Lip Ping) and
7:
1403:Malaysian people convicted of murder
1398:20th-century executions by Singapore
642:"Two get six years for manslaughter"
387:, Kumar gradually became devoted to
185:Trials of Abdul Ghaffur and Ganesan
127:Abdul Ghaffur Parith Mohamed Kassim
492:"Five men accused of man's murder"
25:
1352:from the original on 2 March 2024
1322:from the original on 2 March 2024
1292:from the original on 2 March 2024
1262:from the original on 2 March 2024
1232:from the original on 2 March 2024
1202:from the original on 2 March 2024
1172:from the original on 2 March 2024
1142:from the original on 2 March 2024
1112:from the original on 2 March 2024
1082:from the original on 2 March 2024
1052:from the original on 2 March 2024
952:from the original on 2 March 2024
922:from the original on 2 March 2024
892:from the original on 2 March 2024
862:from the original on 2 March 2024
832:from the original on 2 March 2024
802:from the original on 2 March 2024
772:from the original on 2 March 2024
742:from the original on 2 March 2024
712:from the original on 2 March 2024
702:"Trio begin murder defence today"
682:from the original on 2 March 2024
652:from the original on 2 March 2024
622:from the original on 2 March 2024
592:from the original on 2 March 2024
562:from the original on 2 March 2024
532:from the original on 2 March 2024
522:"Five charged with murdering man"
502:from the original on 2 March 2024
451:from the original on 2 March 2024
121:, 38-year-old ice factory worker
1413:Malaysian people executed abroad
1048:(in Chinese). 24 December 1994.
768:(in Chinese). 30 November 1988.
738:(in Chinese). 24 November 1988.
294:Jabar's constitutional challenge
1388:Capital punishment in Singapore
798:(in Chinese). 4 December 1988.
678:(in Chinese). 1 November 1988.
618:(in Chinese). 31 October 1988.
421:Capital punishment in Singapore
79:Fatal slash wound to the liver
1:
948:(in Chinese). 26 April 1991.
792:"三印族劳工被控谋杀案 联审法官审毕谕令保留判决另日宣判"
762:"三印族劳工被控谋杀案 首被告说同伴遭袭向死者一伙人报复"
1418:Violence against men in Asia
588:(in Chinese). 3 April 1986.
918:(in Chinese). 11 May 1989.
912:"深夜纠众问罪·杀死制冰工人 三印族劳工 被判处死刑"
858:(in Chinese). 12 May 1989.
103:Nanyang Chinese Ice Factory
1434:
1288:(in Chinese). 3 May 1995.
1258:(in Chinese). 3 May 1995.
1228:(in Chinese). 3 May 1995.
1198:(in Chinese). 3 May 1995.
447:(in Chinese). 3 May 1995.
262:and two High Court judges
197:On the same date, Justice
1383:1985 murders in Singapore
1192:"死前深感忏悔 狱中完成心愿 江湖杀手 落发为僧"
888:(in Malay). 12 May 1989.
1222:"隆根长老： '既已皈依我佛 应让他完成心愿'"
1132:"Killer's plea rejected"
996:[1995] ICHRL 11
328:, where it quoted that:
1009:26 October 2012 at the
61:28 April 1985 (aged 38)
1286:新明日报 (Xin Ming Ri Bao)
1256:新明日报 (Xin Ming Ri Bao)
1226:新明日报 (Xin Ming Ri Bao)
1196:新明日报 (Xin Ming Ri Bao)
1042:"以刑期拖太久违宪为由死囚第二次上诉求免死"
1000:[1995] SGCA 18
852:"纠众寻仇·杀害雪厂工人 三大马劳工判死刑"
586:新明日报 (Xin Ming Ri Bao)
445:新明日报 (Xin Ming Ri Bao)
368:Executions of the trio
334:
271:President of Singapore
247:On 25 April 1991, the
1316:Amnesty International
1166:Amnesty International
582:"遭控非法集会杀死人 五被告表面罪状成立"
552:"5 accused of murder"
401:Amnesty International
362:Amnesty International
330:
319:Judicial Commissioner
220:- in the High Court.
215:Judicial Commissioner
1393:Capital murder cases
1078:. 28 December 1994.
1046:联合早报 (Lianhe Zaobao)
946:联合早报 (Lianhe Zaobao)
916:联合晚报 (Lianhe Wanbao)
856:联合早报 (Lianhe Zaobao)
796:联合早报 (Lianhe Zaobao)
766:联合早报 (Lianhe Zaobao)
736:联合早报 (Lianhe Zaobao)
708:. 28 November 1988.
676:联合早报 (Lianhe Zaobao)
616:联合晚报 (Lianhe Wanbao)
326:Indian Supreme Court
153:Murder investigation
143:Chandran Gangatharan
131:S. Ganesan Shanmugam
1378:Murder in Singapore
1030:. 28 December 1994.
1013:on 26 October 2012.
648:. 1 November 1988.
441:"踏上死亡路 替朋友出头 挥斧砍死人"
123:Samynathan Pawathai
76:Cause of death
51:Colony of Singapore
44:Samynathan Pawathai
34:Samynathan Pawathai
18:Samynathan Pawathai
732:"结伙寻仇闹出人命三劳工须进行答辩"
672:"结伙寻仇闹出人命两印族劳工监六年"
233:sentenced to death
171:sentenced to death
147:sentenced to death
95:Ice factory worker
1346:The Straits Times
1282:"传文法师： 首名死囚 狱中出家"
1168:. 26 April 1995.
1138:. 13 April 1995.
1108:. 13 April 1995.
1106:The Straits Times
1076:The Straits Times
826:The Straits Times
706:The Straits Times
646:The Straits Times
556:The Straits Times
528:. 29 April 1985.
526:Singapore Monitor
498:. 30 April 1985.
496:The Straits Times
349:life imprisonment
287:stay of execution
180:Court proceedings
139:Jabar Kadermastan
115:
114:
16:(Redirected from
1425:
1362:
1361:
1359:
1357:
1338:
1332:
1331:
1329:
1327:
1308:
1302:
1301:
1299:
1297:
1278:
1272:
1271:
1269:
1267:
1248:
1242:
1241:
1239:
1237:
1218:
1212:
1211:
1209:
1207:
1188:
1182:
1181:
1179:
1177:
1158:
1152:
1151:
1149:
1147:
1128:
1122:
1121:
1119:
1117:
1098:
1092:
1091:
1089:
1087:
1068:
1062:
1061:
1059:
1057:
1038:
1032:
1031:
1020:
1014:
989:
978:
968:
962:
961:
959:
957:
938:
932:
931:
929:
927:
908:
902:
901:
899:
897:
878:
872:
871:
869:
867:
848:
842:
841:
839:
837:
818:
812:
811:
809:
807:
788:
782:
781:
779:
777:
758:
752:
751:
749:
747:
728:
722:
721:
719:
717:
698:
692:
691:
689:
687:
668:
662:
661:
659:
657:
638:
632:
631:
629:
627:
612:"杀死制冰厂工人两劳工坐牢六年"
608:
602:
601:
599:
597:
578:
572:
571:
569:
567:
558:. 4 April 1986.
548:
542:
541:
539:
537:
518:
512:
511:
509:
507:
488:
482:
472:
461:
460:
458:
456:
437:
243:Appeal processes
84:Other names
30:
21:
1433:
1432:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1355:
1353:
1348:. 8 June 1995.
1340:
1339:
1335:
1325:
1323:
1318:. 16 May 1995.
1310:
1309:
1305:
1295:
1293:
1280:
1279:
1275:
1265:
1263:
1250:
1249:
1245:
1235:
1233:
1220:
1219:
1215:
1205:
1203:
1190:
1189:
1185:
1175:
1173:
1160:
1159:
1155:
1145:
1143:
1130:
1129:
1125:
1115:
1113:
1100:
1099:
1095:
1085:
1083:
1070:
1069:
1065:
1055:
1053:
1040:
1039:
1035:
1022:
1021:
1017:
1011:Wayback Machine
990:
981:
975:Court of Appeal
969:
965:
955:
953:
940:
939:
935:
925:
923:
910:
909:
905:
895:
893:
880:
879:
875:
865:
863:
850:
849:
845:
835:
833:
828:. 12 May 1989.
820:
819:
815:
805:
803:
790:
789:
785:
775:
773:
760:
759:
755:
745:
743:
730:
729:
725:
715:
713:
700:
699:
695:
685:
683:
670:
669:
665:
655:
653:
640:
639:
635:
625:
623:
610:
609:
605:
595:
593:
580:
579:
575:
565:
563:
550:
549:
545:
535:
533:
520:
519:
515:
505:
503:
490:
489:
485:
473:
464:
454:
452:
439:
438:
434:
429:
417:
370:
338:Court of Appeal
296:
276:Ong Teng Cheong
249:Court of Appeal
245:
207:
187:
182:
155:
71:
62:
53:
48:
46:
45:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1431:
1429:
1421:
1420:
1415:
1410:
1405:
1400:
1395:
1390:
1385:
1380:
1370:
1369:
1364:
1363:
1333:
1303:
1273:
1243:
1213:
1183:
1153:
1123:
1093:
1063:
1033:
1015:
979:
963:
933:
903:
873:
843:
813:
783:
753:
723:
693:
663:
633:
603:
573:
543:
513:
483:
462:
431:
430:
428:
425:
424:
423:
416:
413:
369:
366:
295:
292:
251:dismissed the
244:
241:
206:
203:
199:Chan Sek Keong
186:
183:
181:
178:
154:
151:
113:
112:
109:
108:Known for
105:
104:
101:
97:
96:
93:
89:
88:
85:
81:
80:
77:
73:
72:
63:
59:
55:
54:
49:
43:
41:
37:
36:
33:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1430:
1419:
1416:
1414:
1411:
1409:
1406:
1404:
1401:
1399:
1396:
1394:
1391:
1389:
1386:
1384:
1381:
1379:
1376:
1375:
1373:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1337:
1334:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1307:
1304:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1277:
1274:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1247:
1244:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1217:
1214:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1187:
1184:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1157:
1154:
1141:
1137:
1136:The New Paper
1133:
1127:
1124:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1097:
1094:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1067:
1064:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1037:
1034:
1029:
1025:
1019:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
988:
986:
984:
980:
976:
972:
967:
964:
951:
947:
943:
937:
934:
921:
917:
913:
907:
904:
891:
887:
886:Berita Harian
883:
877:
874:
861:
857:
853:
847:
844:
831:
827:
823:
817:
814:
801:
797:
793:
787:
784:
771:
767:
763:
757:
754:
741:
737:
733:
727:
724:
711:
707:
703:
697:
694:
681:
677:
673:
667:
664:
651:
647:
643:
637:
634:
621:
617:
613:
607:
604:
591:
587:
583:
577:
574:
561:
557:
553:
547:
544:
531:
527:
523:
517:
514:
501:
497:
493:
487:
484:
480:
476:
471:
469:
467:
463:
450:
446:
442:
436:
433:
426:
422:
419:
418:
414:
412:
408:
404:
402:
398:
397:Changi Prison
393:
390:
386:
381:
379:
375:
367:
365:
363:
357:
354:
353:death penalty
350:
346:
345:Yong Pung How
343:
342:Chief Justice
339:
333:
329:
327:
323:
322:Kan Ting Chiu
320:
315:
312:
308:
304:
299:
291:
288:
284:
279:
277:
272:
267:
265:
261:
260:Yong Pung How
258:
257:Chief Justice
254:
250:
242:
240:
238:
234:
229:
225:
221:
219:
218:Chao Hick Tin
216:
212:
204:
202:
200:
195:
193:
192:death penalty
184:
179:
177:
174:
172:
166:
162:
160:
152:
150:
148:
144:
140:
136:
135:Kumar Nadison
132:
128:
124:
120:
111:Murder victim
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
60:
56:
52:
42:
38:
31:
19:
1354:. Retrieved
1345:
1336:
1324:. Retrieved
1315:
1306:
1294:. Retrieved
1285:
1276:
1264:. Retrieved
1255:
1246:
1234:. Retrieved
1225:
1216:
1204:. Retrieved
1195:
1186:
1174:. Retrieved
1165:
1156:
1144:. Retrieved
1135:
1126:
1114:. Retrieved
1105:
1096:
1084:. Retrieved
1075:
1066:
1054:. Retrieved
1045:
1036:
1027:
1018:
1004:the original
991:
977:(Singapore).
970:
966:
954:. Retrieved
945:
936:
924:. Retrieved
915:
906:
894:. Retrieved
885:
876:
864:. Retrieved
855:
846:
834:. Retrieved
825:
816:
804:. Retrieved
795:
786:
774:. Retrieved
765:
756:
744:. Retrieved
735:
726:
714:. Retrieved
705:
696:
684:. Retrieved
675:
666:
654:. Retrieved
645:
636:
624:. Retrieved
615:
606:
594:. Retrieved
585:
576:
564:. Retrieved
555:
546:
534:. Retrieved
525:
516:
504:. Retrieved
495:
486:
481:(Singapore).
474:
453:. Retrieved
444:
435:
409:
405:
394:
382:
371:
358:
335:
331:
316:
300:
297:
280:
268:
264:Lai Kew Chai
246:
230:
226:
222:
208:
196:
188:
175:
167:
163:
156:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
116:
87:Chelia Dorai
1252:"牢房念经 日食一餐"
942:"三杀人死囚上诉失败"
159:Tanjong Rhu
119:Tanjong Rhu
65:Tanjong Rhu
1372:Categories
479:High Court
427:References
311:Bala Reddy
303:High Court
211:High Court
92:Occupation
385:death row
378:death row
374:appealing
307:death row
69:Singapore
1350:Archived
1320:Archived
1290:Archived
1260:Archived
1230:Archived
1200:Archived
1170:Archived
1140:Archived
1110:Archived
1080:Archived
1050:Archived
1028:Upi News
1007:Archived
950:Archived
920:Archived
890:Archived
860:Archived
830:Archived
800:Archived
770:Archived
740:Archived
710:Archived
680:Archived
650:Archived
620:Archived
590:Archived
560:Archived
530:Archived
500:Archived
449:Archived
415:See also
389:Buddhism
100:Employer
1356:2 March
1326:2 March
1296:2 March
1266:2 March
1236:2 March
1206:2 March
1176:2 March
1146:2 March
1116:2 March
1086:2 March
1056:2 March
956:2 March
926:2 March
896:2 March
866:2 March
836:2 March
806:2 March
776:2 March
746:2 March
716:2 March
686:2 March
656:2 March
626:2 March
596:2 March
566:2 March
536:2 March
506:2 March
455:2 March
283:respite
253:appeals
237:hanging
994:
1358:2024
1328:2024
1298:2024
1268:2024
1238:2024
1208:2024
1178:2024
1148:2024
1118:2024
1088:2024
1058:2024
958:2024
928:2024
898:2024
868:2024
838:2024
808:2024
778:2024
748:2024
718:2024
688:2024
658:2024
628:2024
598:2024
568:2024
538:2024
508:2024
457:2024
141:and
129:and
58:Died
47:1947
40:Born
235:by
1374::
1344:.
1314:.
1284:.
1254:.
1224:.
1194:.
1164:.
1134:.
1104:.
1074:.
1044:.
1026:.
998:,
982:^
973:,
944:.
914:.
884:.
854:.
824:.
794:.
764:.
734:.
704:.
674:.
644:.
614:.
584:.
554:.
524:.
494:.
477:,
465:^
443:.
239:.
173:.
137:,
67:,
1360:.
1330:.
1300:.
1270:.
1240:.
1210:.
1180:.
1150:.
1120:.
1090:.
1060:.
960:.
930:.
900:.
870:.
840:.
810:.
780:.
750:.
720:.
690:.
660:.
630:.
600:.
570:.
540:.
510:.
459:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.