Knowledge (XXG)

Semantic feature

Source 📝

462: 54:. One aim of these subfields is to explain the meaning of a word in terms of their relationships with other words. In order to accomplish this aim, one approach is to analyze the internal semantic structure of a word as composed of a number of distinct and minimal components of meaning. This approach is called 20:
is a component of the concept associated with a lexical item ('female' + 'performer' = 'actress'). More generally, it can also be a component of the concept associated with any grammatical unit, whether composed or not ('female' + 'performer' = 'the female performer' or 'the actress'). An individual
25:, which is the inherent sense or concept evoked. Linguistic meaning of a word is proposed to arise from contrasts and significant differences with other words. Semantic features enable linguistics to explain how words that share certain features may be members of the same 37:
share the common components of "human", "kinship", "male" and are thus part of a semantic domain of male family relations. They differ in terms of "generation" and "adulthood", which is what gives each its individual meaning.
73:
The theory of componential analysis and semantic features is not the only approach to analyzing the semantic structure of words. An alternative direction of research that contrasts with componential analysis is
58:, also known as semantic decomposition. Semantic decomposition allows any given lexical item to be defined based on minimal elements of meaning, which are called semantic features. The term 503: 170:
share the same features. Some features need not be specifically mentioned as their presence or absence is obvious from another feature. This is a
422: 199: 445: 395: 376: 236: 496: 46:
The analysis of semantic features is utilized in the field of linguistic semantics, more specifically the subfields of
527: 98:
is specified in square brackets and a plus or minus sign indicates the existence or non-existence of that property.
532: 171: 29:. Correspondingly, the contrast in meanings of words is explained by diverging semantic features. For example, 489: 371:. Translated by Trauth, Gregory; Kazzazi, Kerstin (2nd completely revised ed.). London: Routledge. 91: 55: 522: 441: 418: 401: 391: 372: 232: 195: 190:
Fromkin, Victoria; Rodman, Robert; Hyams, Nina (2014). "Semantics: The Meanings of Language".
95: 67: 47: 473: 388:
An outline of English lexicology : lexical structure, word semantics, and word-formation
75: 26: 167: 516: 90:
of a word can be notated using a binary feature notation common to the framework of
66:. Additionally, semantic features/semantic components are also often referred to as 461: 434: 229:
Componential analysis of meaning : an introduction to semantic structures
51: 413:
O'Grady, William; Archibald, John; Aronoff, Mark; Rees-Miller, Janie (2010).
405: 390:. Forschung & Studium Anglistik (2nd ed.). Tübingen: Niemeyer. 469: 22: 194:(10th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. p. 578. 299: 214: 367:
Bussmann, Hadumod (1996). Trauth, Gregory; Kazzazi, Kerstin (eds.).
477: 21:
semantic feature constitutes one component of a word's
310: 308: 231:(2nd ed.). The Hague: Mouton. pp. 32–33. 440:(2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. 433: 417:(6th ed.). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin's. 369:Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics 62:is usually used interchangeably with the term 497: 8: 504: 490: 415:Contemporary Linguistics: An Introduction 338: 263: 182: 326: 287: 275: 251: 350: 314: 7: 458: 456: 476:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 14: 460: 432:Palmer, Frank R. (1981). 1: 192:An Introduction to Language 549: 455: 329:, pp. 191, 198, 200. 386:Lipka, Leonhard (1990). 227:Nida, Eugene A. (1979). 300:O'Grady et al. (2010) 215:O'Grady et al. (2010) 92:componential analysis 56:componential analysis 76:prototype semantics 68:semantic properties 42:Theoretical context 528:Semantic relations 254:, pp. 67–114. 64:semantic component 485: 484: 424:978-0-312-55528-3 201:978-1-133-31068-6 96:semantic property 88:semantic features 48:lexical semantics 540: 506: 499: 492: 464: 457: 451: 439: 428: 409: 382: 354: 348: 342: 336: 330: 324: 318: 312: 303: 297: 291: 285: 279: 273: 267: 261: 255: 249: 243: 242: 224: 218: 212: 206: 205: 187: 168:semantic classes 60:semantic feature 18:semantic feature 548: 547: 543: 542: 541: 539: 538: 537: 533:Semantics stubs 513: 512: 511: 510: 454: 448: 431: 425: 412: 398: 385: 379: 366: 362: 357: 349: 345: 339:Bussmann (1996) 337: 333: 325: 321: 313: 306: 298: 294: 286: 282: 274: 270: 262: 258: 250: 246: 239: 226: 225: 221: 213: 209: 202: 189: 188: 184: 180: 84: 44: 27:semantic domain 12: 11: 5: 546: 544: 536: 535: 530: 525: 515: 514: 509: 508: 501: 494: 486: 483: 482: 465: 453: 452: 446: 429: 423: 410: 396: 383: 377: 363: 361: 358: 356: 355: 353:, p. 108. 343: 341:, p. 219. 331: 319: 304: 302:, p. 210. 292: 290:, p. 108. 280: 268: 256: 244: 237: 219: 217:, p. 619. 207: 200: 181: 179: 176: 164: 163: 162: 161: 159: 157: 148: 147: 146: 144: 141: 132: 131: 130: 128: 125: 116: 115: 114: 112: 109: 83: 80: 43: 40: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 545: 534: 531: 529: 526: 524: 521: 520: 518: 507: 502: 500: 495: 493: 488: 487: 481: 479: 475: 472:article is a 471: 466: 463: 459: 449: 447:0-521-28376-0 443: 438: 437: 430: 426: 420: 416: 411: 407: 403: 399: 397:3-484-41003-5 393: 389: 384: 380: 378:0-415-02225-8 374: 370: 365: 364: 359: 352: 347: 344: 340: 335: 332: 328: 327:Palmer (1981) 323: 320: 317:, p. 98. 316: 311: 309: 305: 301: 296: 293: 289: 288:Palmer (1981) 284: 281: 278:, p. 83. 277: 276:Palmer (1981) 272: 269: 265: 264:Bussmann 1996 260: 257: 253: 252:Palmer (1981) 248: 245: 240: 238:90-279-7927-8 234: 230: 223: 220: 216: 211: 208: 203: 197: 193: 186: 183: 177: 175: 173: 169: 166:Intersecting 160: 158: 155: 154: 152: 149: 145: 142: 139: 138: 136: 133: 129: 126: 123: 122: 120: 117: 113: 110: 107: 106: 104: 101: 100: 99: 97: 93: 89: 81: 79: 77: 71: 69: 65: 61: 57: 53: 49: 41: 39: 36: 32: 28: 24: 19: 478:expanding it 467: 435: 414: 387: 368: 360:Bibliography 351:Lipka (1990) 346: 334: 322: 315:Lipka (1990) 295: 283: 271: 259: 247: 228: 222: 210: 191: 185: 165: 150: 134: 118: 102: 87: 85: 72: 63: 59: 45: 34: 30: 17: 15: 517:Categories 178:References 172:redundancy 52:lexicology 523:Semantics 470:semantics 436:Semantics 406:0178-7861 23:intention 82:Notation 444:  421:  404:  394:  375:  235:  198:  174:rule. 50:, and 31:father 468:This 474:stub 442:ISBN 419:ISBN 402:ISSN 392:ISBN 373:ISBN 233:ISBN 196:ISBN 151:wolf 119:puma 94:. A 86:The 33:and 153:is 137:is 135:dog 121:is 105:is 103:cat 35:son 519:: 400:. 307:^ 78:. 70:. 16:A 505:e 498:t 491:v 480:. 450:. 427:. 408:. 381:. 266:. 241:. 204:. 156:, 143:, 140:, 127:, 124:, 111:, 108:,

Index

intention
semantic domain
lexical semantics
lexicology
componential analysis
semantic properties
prototype semantics
componential analysis
semantic property
semantic classes
redundancy
ISBN
978-1-133-31068-6
O'Grady et al. (2010)
ISBN
90-279-7927-8
Palmer (1981)
Bussmann 1996
Palmer (1981)
Palmer (1981)
O'Grady et al. (2010)


Lipka (1990)
Palmer (1981)
Bussmann (1996)
Lipka (1990)
ISBN
0-415-02225-8
ISBN

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.