Knowledge (XXG)

Collective action problem

Source đź“ť

421:, comes into play. For instance, a company could put on a fireworks display and charge an admittance price of $ 10, but if community members could all view the fireworks display from their homes, most would choose not to pay the admittance fee. Thus, the majority of individuals would choose to free ride, discouraging the company from putting on another fireworks show in the future. Even though the fireworks display was surely beneficial to each of the individuals, they relied on those paying the admittance fee to finance the show. If everybody had assumed this position, however, the company putting on the show would not have been able to procure the funds necessary to buy the fireworks that provided enjoyment for so many individuals. This situation is indicative of a collective action problem because the individual incentive to free ride conflicts with the collective desire of the group to pay for a fireworks show for all to enjoy. 406:
benefit from them and one person's use of them does not hinder another person's use of them. An example is public broadcasting that relies on contributions from viewers. Since no single viewer is essential for providing the service, viewers can reap the benefits of the service without paying anything for it. If not enough people contribute, the service cannot be provided. In economics, the literature around public goods dilemmas refers to the phenomenon as the free rider problem. The economic approach is broadly applicable and can refer to the free-riding that accompanies any sort of public good. In social psychology, the literature refers to this phenomenon as social loafing. Whereas free-riding is generally used to describe public goods, social loafing refers specifically to the tendency for people to exert less effort when in a group than when working alone.
229:. The classical prisoner's dilemma model consists of two players who are accused of a crime. If Player A decides to betray Player B, Player A will receive no prison time while Player B receives a substantial prison sentence, and vice versa. If both players choose to keep quiet about the crime, they will both receive reduced prison sentences, and if both players turn the other in, they will each receive more substantial sentences. It would appear in this situation that each player should choose to stay quiet so that both will receive reduced sentences. In actuality, however, players who are unable to communicate will both choose to betray each other, as they each have an individual incentive to do so in order to receive a commuted sentence. 667:
cooperation—maximizing joint outcomes. The first two orientations are referred to as proself orientations and the third as a prosocial orientation. There is much support for the idea that prosocial and proself individuals behave differently when confronted with a social dilemma in the laboratory as well as the field. People with prosocial orientations weigh the moral implications of their decisions more and see cooperation as the most preferable choice in a social dilemma. When there are conditions of scarcity, like a water shortage, prosocials harvest less from a common resource. Similarly prosocials are more concerned about the environmental consequences of, for example, taking the car or public transport.
730:
Experimental research suggests that particularly low trust individuals are willing to invest money in punishment systems. A considerable portion of people are quite willing to punish non-cooperators even if they personally do not profit. Some researchers even suggest that altruistic punishment is an evolved mechanism for human cooperation. A third limitation is that punishment and reward systems might undermine people's voluntary cooperative intention. Some people get a "warm glow" from cooperation and the provision of selective incentives might crowd out their cooperative intention. Similarly the presence of a negative
482:. According to Lloyd, "If a person puts more cattle into his own field, the amount of the subsistence which they consume is all deducted from that which was at the command, of his original stock; and if, before, there was no more than a sufficiency of pasture, he reaps no benefit from the additional cattle, what is gained in one way being lost in another. But if he puts more cattle on a common, the food which they consume forms a deduction which is shared between all the cattle, as well that of others as his own, in proportion to their number, and only a small part of it is taken from his own cattle". 725:
information, know one another, have effective arenas for conflict resolution, and are managing social and ecological systems that have well-defined boundaries or are easily monitorable. Yet implementation of reward and punishment systems can be problematic for various reasons. First, there are significant costs associated with creating and administering sanction systems. Providing selective rewards and punishments requires support institutions to monitor the activities of both cooperators and non-cooperators, which can be quite expensive to maintain. Second, these systems are themselves
493:. By 1992, the population of cod had completely collapsed because fishers had not left enough fish to repopulate the species. Another example is the higher rates of COVID-19 cases of sickness and deaths in individualistic (vs. collectivists) countries. (Note that more recent research from 2022 suggest that individualistic societies are associated with lower COVID-19-related mortality rates. This finding contradicts previous studies that supported the popular narrative that collectivistic societies with an obedient population are better positioned to manage the pandemic.) 429:
resources and finance projects that benefit the collective group. The ability of communities to successfully contribute to public welfare depends on the size of the group, the power or influence of group members, the tastes and preferences of individuals within the group, and the distribution of benefits among group members. When a group is too large or the benefits of collective action are not tangible to individual members, the collective action problem results in a lack of cooperation that makes the provision of public goods difficult.
453: 751:
extremely important in citizen's willingness to accept authorities. Other research emphasizes a greater motivation for groups to successfully self-organize, without the need for an external authority base, when they do place a high value on the resources in question but, again, before the resources are severely overharvested. An external "authority" is not presumed to be the solution in these cases, however effective self-organization and collective governance and care for the resource base is.
3242: 605:. This statistic may discourage individuals from exercising their democratic right to vote, as they believe they could not possibly affect the results of an election. If everybody adopted this view and decided not to vote, however, democracy would collapse. This situation results in a collective action problem, as any single individual is incentivized to choose to stay home from the polls since their vote is very unlikely to make a real difference in the outcome of an election. 645:
or favor even more stringent regulations. This illustrates the way the collective problem hinders group action on environmental issues: when an individual is directly affected by an issue such as food and water quality, they will favor regulations, but when an individual cannot see a great impact from their personal carbon emissions or waste accumulation, they will generally tend to disagree with laws that encourage them to cut back on environmentally-harmful activities.
218:
choice theory, expected utility theory). Game theory assumes that individuals are rational actors motivated to maximize their utilities. Utility is often narrowly defined in terms of people's economic self-interest. Game theory thus predicts a non-cooperative outcome in a social dilemma. Although this is a useful starting premise there are many circumstances in which people may deviate from individual rationality.
3667: 502: 210: 3657: 762:. This restructuring of incentives would remove the temptation to place individual needs above group needs. However, it is not easy to privatize moveable resources such as fish, water, and clean air. Privatization also raises concerns about social justice as not everyone may be able to get an equal share. Privatization might also erode people's intrinsic motivation to cooperate, by externalizing the 800: 551:, the best strategy to take in conflict is to show signs of strength and willingness to use force if necessary. This approach is intended to dissuade attacks before they happen. Conversely, the conflict spiral view holds that deterrence strategies increase hostilities and defensiveness and that a clear demonstration of peaceful intentions is the most effective way to avoid escalation. 633:, and waste accumulation can be described as collective action problems. Since these issues are connected to the everyday actions of vast numbers of people, vast numbers of people are also required to mitigate the effects of these environmental problems. Without governmental regulation, however, individual people or businesses are unlikely to take the actions necessary to reduce 417:. A good is said to be nonrival if its consumption by one consumer does not in any way impact its consumption by another consumer. Additionally, a good is said to be nonexcludable if those who do not pay for the good cannot be kept from enjoying the benefits of the good. The nonexcludability aspect of public goods is where one facet of the collective action problem, known as the 170:. In it, he addressed the accepted belief at the time by sociologists and political scientists that groups were necessary to further the interests of their members. Olson argued that individual rationality does not necessarily result in group rationality, as members of a group may have conflicting interests that do not represent the best interests of the overall group. 755:
dilemma into smaller more manageable parts) is often an effective tool in raising cooperation under such circumstances. Additional research on governance shows that group size has a curvilinear effect, since at low numbers, governance groups may also not have enough people to effectively research, manage, and administer the resource system or the governance process.
3677: 711:
preferred as collaborative partners, romantic partners, and group leaders. This only occurs however when people's social dilemma choices are monitored by others. Public acts of altruism and cooperation like charity giving, philanthropy, and bystander intervention are probably manifestations of reputation-based cooperation.
875:
literature studying brain correlates of decision-making in social dilemmas with neuroscience methods. The interdisciplinary nature of the study of social dilemmas does not fit into the conventional distinctions between fields, and demands a multidisciplinary approach that transcends divisions between
698:
strategy (TFT). TFT is characterized by first making a cooperative move while the next move mimics the decision of the partner. Thus, if a partner does not cooperate, you copy this move until your partner starts to cooperate. Computer tournaments in which different strategies were pitted against each
616:
to be higher than it actually is, stopping millions of Americans from believing their vote does not matter and staying home from the polls. Thus, it appears collective action problems can be resolved not just by tangible benefits to individuals participating in group action, but by a mere belief that
245:
is a simple game that serves as the basis for research on social dilemmas. The premise of the game is that two partners in crime are imprisoned separately and each are offered leniency if they provide evidence against the other. As seen in the table below, the optimal individual outcome is to testify
710:
Even when partners might not meet again it could be strategically wise to cooperate. When people can selectively choose whom to interact with it might pay to be seen as a cooperator. Research shows that cooperators create better opportunities for themselves than non-cooperators: They are selectively
702:
However, TFT is quite an unforgiving strategy, and in noisy real-world dilemmas a more forgiving strategy has its own advantages. Such a strategy is known as Generous-tit-for-tat (GTFT). This strategy always reciprocates cooperation with cooperation, and usually replies to defection with defection.
685:
Social dilemma theory was applied to study social media communication and knowledge sharing in organizations. Organizational knowledge can be considered a public good where motivation to contribute is key. Both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation are important at individual level and can be addressed
681:
However, there may be strategic considerations as well. First, communication gives group members a chance to make promises and explicit commitments about what they will do. It is not clear if many people stick to their promises to cooperate. Similarly, through communication people are able to gather
308:
Asymmetric prisoner's dilemma games are those in which one prisoner has more to gain and/or lose than the other. In iterated experiments with unequal rewards for co-operation, a goal of maximizing benefit may be overruled by a goal of equalizing benefit. The disadvantaged player may defect a certain
773:
There are many additional structural solutions which modify the social dilemma, both from the inside and from the outside. The likelihood of successfully co-managing a shared resource, successfully organizing to self-govern, or successfully cooperating in a social dilemma depends on many variables,
644:
Individual self interest has led to over half of Americans believing that government regulation of businesses does more harm than good. Yet, when the same Americans are asked about specific regulations such as standards for food and water quality, most are satisfied with the laws currently in place
378:
assumes that people might cooperate under two conditions: They must (1) have a cooperative goal, and (2) expect others to cooperate. Another psychological model, the appropriateness model, questions the game theory assumption that individuals rationally calculate their pay-offs. Instead many people
754:
Another structural solution is reducing group size. Cooperation generally declines when group size increases. In larger groups people often feel less responsible for the common good and believe that their contribution does not matter. Reducing the scale of a problem (such as dividing a large scale
750:
with limited power especially when people's group ties are strong. When ties are weak, groups prefer a stronger leader with a coercive power base. The question remains whether authorities can be trusted in governing social dilemmas and field research shows that legitimacy and fair procedures are
348:
delineates that cooperating with family members might pay because of shared genetic interests. It might be profitable for a parent to help their off-spring because doing so facilitates the survival of their genes. Reciprocity theories provide a different account of the evolution of cooperation. In
125:
consists of a perpetual war between people with conflicting interests, causing people to quarrel and seek personal power even in situations where cooperation would be mutually beneficial for both parties. Through his interpretation of humans in the state of nature as selfish and quick to engage in
866:
Research in this area is applied to areas such as organizational welfare, public health, local and global environmental change. The emphasis is shifting from pure laboratory research towards research testing combinations of motivational, strategic, and structural solutions. It is encouraging that
719:
Structural solutions change the rules of the game either through modifying the social dilemma or removing the dilemma altogether. Field research on conservation behaviour has shown that selective incentives in the form of monetary rewards are effective in decreasing domestic water and electricity
142:
Two neighbours may agree to drain a meadow, which they possess in common; because it is easy for them to know each others mind; and each must perceive, that the immediate consequence of his failing in his part, is, the abandoning the whole project. But it is very difficult, and indeed impossible,
670:
Research on the development of social value orientations suggest an influence of factors like family history (prosocials have more sibling sisters), age (older people are more prosocial), culture (more individualists in Western cultures), gender (more women are prosocial), even university course
529:
An example of a social trap is the use of vehicles and the resulting pollution. Viewed individually, vehicles are an adaptive technology that have revolutionized transportation and greatly improved quality of life. But their current widespread use produces high levels of pollution, directly from
405:
dilemma is a situation in which the whole group can benefit if some of the members give something for the common good but individuals benefit from “free riding” if enough others contribute. Public goods are defined by two characteristics: non-excludability and non-rivalry—meaning that anyone can
177:
that is both nonrival and nonexcludable, one contributor tends to reduce their contribution to the public good as others contribute more. Additionally, Olson emphasized the tendency of individuals to pursue economic interests that would be beneficial to themselves and not necessarily the overall
373:
suggests that people transform a given pay-off matrix into an effective matrix that is more consistent with their social dilemma preferences. A prisoner's dilemma with close kin, for example, changes the pay-off matrix into one in which it is rational to be cooperative. Attribution models offer
237:
The prisoner's dilemma model is crucial to understanding the collective problem because it illustrates the consequences of individual interests that conflict with the interests of the group. In simple models such as this one, the problem would have been solved had the two prisoners been able to
217:
Social dilemmas have attracted a great deal of interest in the social and behavioral sciences. Economists, biologists, psychologists, sociologists, and political scientists alike study behavior in social dilemmas. The most influential theoretical approach is economic game theory (i.e., rational
729:
because one can enjoy the benefits of a sanctioning system without contribution to its existence. The police, army, and judicial system will fail to operate unless people are willing to pay taxes to support them. This raises the question if many people want to contribute to these institutions.
653:
Studying the conditions under which people cooperate can shed light on how to resolve social dilemmas. The literature distinguishes between three broad classes of solutions—motivational, strategic, and structural—which vary in whether they see actors as motivated purely by self-interest and in
428:
and public parks that are usually provided by governments using taxpayer funds. In return for their tax contribution, taxpayers enjoy the benefits of these public goods. In developing countries where funding for public projects is scarce, however, it often falls on communities to compete for
724:
is more likely based on a number of factors, including whether or not individuals have the ability to monitor the situation, to punish or "sanction" defectors, if they are legitimized by external political structures to cooperate and self-organize, can communicate with one another and share
666:
which shows that people have stable preferences for how much they value outcomes for self versus others. Research has concentrated on three social motives: (1) individualism—maximizing own outcomes regardless of others; (2) competition—maximizing own outcomes relative to others; and (3)
143:
that a thousand persons should agree in any such action; it being difficult for them to concert so complicated a design, and still more difficult for them to execute it; while each seeks a pretext to free himself of the trouble and expence, and would lay the whole burden on others.
863:. Their widespread importance warrants widespread understanding of the main types of dilemmas and accompanying paradigms. Fortunately, the literature on the subject is expanding to accommodate the pressing need to understand social dilemmas as the basis for real-world problems. 383:, like an equality rule, to decide whether or not to cooperate. The logic of appropriateness suggests that people ask themselves the question: "what does a person like me (identity) do (rules/heuristics) in a situation like this (recognition) given this culture (group)?" (Weber 699:
other showed TFT to be the most successful strategy in social dilemmas. TFT is a common strategy in real-world social dilemmas because it is nice but firm. Consider, for instance, that marriage contracts, rental agreements, and international trade policies all use TFT-tactics.
678:. A robust finding in the social dilemma literature is that cooperation increases when people are given a chance to talk to each other. It has been quite a challenge to explain this effect. One motivational reason is that communication reinforces a sense of group identity. 774:
from the nature of the resource system, to the nature of the social system the actors are a part of, to the political position of external authorities, to the ability to communicate effectively, to the rules-in-place regarding the management of the commons. However,
437:
A replenishing resource management dilemma is a situation in which group members share a renewable resource that will continue to produce benefits if group members do not over harvest it but in which any single individual profits from harvesting as much as possible.
357:, but fails to account for larger groups. Evolutionary theories of indirect reciprocity and costly signaling may be useful to explain large-scale cooperation. When people can selectively choose partners to play games with, it pays to develop a cooperative 738:
sanctions, where initial punishments have low severity, make allowances for unusual hardships, and allow the violator to reenter the trust of the collective, have been found to support collective resource management and increase trust in the system.
1274:
Van Vugt, M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2006). Psychological adaptations for prosocial behavior: The altruism puzzle. In M. Schaller, J. A. Simpson, & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolution and Social Psychology (pp. 237–261). New York: Psychology
65:
Problems arise when too many group members choose to pursue individual profit and immediate satisfaction rather than behave in the group's best long-term interests. Social dilemmas can take many forms and are studied across disciplines such as
538:
A perceptual dilemma arises during conflict and is a product of outgroup bias. In this dilemma, the parties to the conflict prefer cooperation while simultaneously believing that the other side would take advantage of conciliatory gestures.
521:
occurs when individuals or groups pursue immediate rewards that later prove to have negative or even lethal consequences. This type of dilemma arises when a behavior produces rewards initially but continuing the same behavior produces
189:
Olson's book established the collective action problem as one of the most troubling dilemmas in social science, leaving a profound impression on present-day discussions of human behaviour and its relationship with governmental policy.
769:
In society, social units which face a social dilemma within are typically embedded in interaction with other groups, often competition for resources of different kinds. Once this is modeled the social dilemma is strongly attenuated.
152:, as they assume that each of the other members of the team will put in enough effort to achieve said goal. In smaller groups, the impact one individual has is much greater, so individuals will be less inclined to free ride. 224:
is one of the principal components of economic theory. It addresses the way individuals allocate scarce resources and how scarcity drives human interaction. One of the most famous examples of game theory is the
374:
further support for these transformations. Whether individuals approach a social dilemma selfishly or cooperatively might depend upon whether they believe people are naturally greedy or cooperative. Similarly,
682:
information about what others do. On the other hand, this information might produce ambiguous results; an awareness of other people's willingness to cooperate may cause a temptation to take advantage of them.
238:
communicate. In more complex real world situations involving numerous individuals, however, the collective action problem often prevents groups from making decisions that are of collective economic interest.
147:
In this passage, Hume establishes the basis for the collective action problem. In a situation in which a thousand people are expected to work together to achieve a common goal, individuals will be likely to
867:
researchers from various behavioral sciences are developing unifying theoretical frameworks to study social dilemmas (like evolutionary theory; or the Social-Ecological Systems framework developed by
570:, each side knew that the use of nuclear weapons would result in their own destruction. While controversial, MAD succeeded in its primary purpose of preventing nuclear war and kept the Cold War cold. 641:, as these people and businesses are incentivized to choose the easier and cheaper option, which often differs from the environmentally-friendly option that would benefit the health of the planet. 349:
repeated social dilemma games between the same individuals, cooperation might emerge because participants can punish a partner for failing to cooperate. This encourages reciprocal cooperation.
612:
in the United States, however, this collective action problem does not decrease voter turnout as much as some political scientists might expect. It turns out that most Americans believe their
1999: 1863: 671:(economics students are less prosocial). However, until we know more about the psychological mechanisms underlying these social value orientations we lack a good basis for interventions. 786:
know who all is involved, do not have a foundation of trust and reciprocity, cannot communicate, have no established rules, and lack effective monitoring and sanctioning mechanisms."
369:
Psychological models offer additional insights into social dilemmas by questioning the traditional game theory assumption that individuals are confined to their narrow self-interest.
1347: 45:
is a situation in which all individuals would be better off cooperating but fail to do so because of conflicting interests between individuals that discourage joint action. The
471:. A common good is rivalrous and non-excludable, meaning that anyone can use the resource but there is a finite amount of the resource available and it is therefore prone to 734:
system might undermine voluntary cooperation. Some research has found that punishment systems decrease the trust that people have in others. Other research has found that
703:
However, with some probability GTFT will forgive a defection by the other player and cooperate. In a world of errors in action and perception, such a strategy can be a
3517: 2518: 2438: 2215: 305:
In iterated games, players may learn to trust one another, or develop strategies like tit-for-tat, cooperating unless the opponent has defected in the previous round.
3567: 3040: 1973: 742:
Boundary structural solutions modify the social dilemma structure and such strategies are often very effective. Experimental studies on commons dilemmas show that
3127: 2877: 1075:
Allison, S. T.; Beggan, J. K.; Midgley, E. H. (1996). "The quest for "similar instances" and "simultaneous possibilities": Metaphors in social dilemma research".
350: 309:
proportion of the time without it being in the interest of the advantaged player to defect. In more natural circumstances, there may be better solutions to the
3687: 2256:
Mulder, L.B.; Van Dijk, E.; De Cremer, D.; Wilke, H.A.M. (2006). "Undermining trust and cooperation: The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas".
2734: 2129: 3418: 3119: 2032: 3401: 1871: 968: 1382:
Weber, M.; Kopelman, S.; Messick, D. (2004). "A conceptual Review of Decision Making in Social Dilemmas: Applying the Logic of Appropriateness".
526:. Stimuli that cause social traps are called sliding reinforcers, since they reinforce the behavior in small doses and punish it in large doses. 2784:
Palfrey, Thomas R. & Rosenthal, Howard (1988). "Private Incentives in Social Dilemmas: The Effects of Incomplete Information and Altruism".
1265:
Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1965). Prisoner’s Dilemma: A study of conflict and cooperation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
186:" of the market, where individuals pursuing their own interests should theoretically result in the collective well-being of the overall market. 3718: 3123: 3093: 746:
groups are more willing to appoint a leader to look after the common resource. There is a preference for a democratically elected prototypical
3241: 121:
in 1651 that "if any two men desire the same thing, which nevertheless they cannot both enjoy, they become enemies." Hobbes believed that the
3381: 3186: 2996: 2814: 2669: 2546: 547:
The prevalence of perceptual dilemmas in conflict has led to the development of two distinct schools of thought on the subject. According to
246:
against the other without being testified against. However, the optimal group outcome is for the two prisoners to cooperate with each other.
3728: 707:
and evolutionarily stable. The more beneficial cooperation is, the more forgiving GTFT can be while still resisting invasion by defectors.
2557: 601:
Scholars estimate that, even in a battleground state, there is only a one in ten million chance that one vote could sway the outcome of a
98:. Additionally, the collective problem can be applied to numerous public policy concerns that countries across the world currently face. 3033: 2600: 2411:
see for example Gunnthorsdottir, A. and Rapoport, A. (2006). "Embedding social dilemmas in intergroup competition reduces free-riding".
602: 1425:
Kopelman, S (2009). "The effect of culture and power on cooperation in commons dilemmas: Implications for global resource management".
344:
theory, individuals may pursue a seemingly irrational strategy to cooperate if it benefits the survival of their genes. The concept of
3414: 3365: 2833: 2077: 1020: 809: 3131: 2950:
Weber, M.; Kopelman, S. & Messick, D. M. (2004). "A conceptual review of social dilemmas: Applying a logic of appropriateness".
1040: 842: 782:
results in a social dilemma (and perhaps the need for privatization or an external authority) tend to occur "when resource users do
115:
was an early philosopher on the topic of human cooperation. Hobbes believed that people act purely out of self-interest, writing in
340:
Biological and evolutionary approaches provide useful complementary insights into decision-making in social dilemmas. According to
1589:
Kenneth T. Frank; Brian Petrie; Jae S. Choi; William C. Leggett (2005). "Trophic Cascades in a Formerly Cod-Dominated Ecosystem".
3146: 1516:
The reduction in motivation and effort when individuals work collectively compared with when they work individually or coactively
3681: 3377: 3373: 3355: 3284: 3101: 341: 325: 1188: 694:
A second category of solutions are primarily strategic. In repeated interactions cooperation might emerge when people adopt a
3753: 3743: 3670: 3627: 3622: 3115: 3026: 166: 58: 585: 132:
provided another early and better-known interpretation of what is now called the collective action problem in his 1738 book
3723: 3617: 3231: 1243:"The Collective Action Problem | GEOG 30N: Geographic Perspectives on Sustainability and Human-Environment Systems, 2011" 3562: 2724:
Messick, D. M. & Brewer, M. B. (1983). "Solving social dilemmas: A review". In Wheeler, L. & Shaver, P. (eds.).
2049:
Orbell, John M.; Dawes, Robyn M. & van de Kragt, Alphons J. C. (1988). "Explaining discussion-induced cooperation".
563: 2987:
Yamagishi, T. (1986). "The structural goal/expectation theory of cooperation in social dilemmas". In Lawler, E. (ed.).
2078:"What factors influence knowledge sharing in organizations? A social dilemma perspective of social media communication" 584:
during a prolonged period of hostilities between the two countries was well-received and ultimately contributed in the
3758: 3708: 3592: 3485: 3448: 3422: 3325: 1286: 1498:
Karau, Steven J.; Williams, Kipling D. (1993). "Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration".
3748: 3532: 3476: 3410: 3310: 3289: 978: 134: 2924:"Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods" 2315:"Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods" 662:
Motivational solutions assume that people have other-regarding preferences. There is a considerable literature on
3557: 3406: 3270: 2773: 2688:"The effect of culture and power on cooperation in commons dilemmas: Implications for global resource management" 2687: 2168: 663: 485:
The template of the tragedy of the commons can be used to understand myriad problems, including various forms of
2350:
Ostrom, Elinor (24 July 2009). "A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems".
813: 573:
Conciliatory gestures have also been used to great effect, in keeping with conflict spiral theory. For example,
126:
conflict, Hobbes's philosophy laid the foundation for what is now referred to as the collective action problem.
3738: 3733: 3587: 3495: 3458: 3427: 3340: 3294: 3097: 3053: 1682:""The Tragedy of the Commons": How Individualism and Collectivism Affected the Spread of the COVID-19 Pandemic" 1488:
Baumol, William (1952). Welfare Economics and the Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
567: 138:. Hume characterizes a collective action problem through his depiction of neighbors agreeing to drain a meadow: 2682:. In E. Ostrom et al., (Eds.) The Drama of the Commons. Washington DC: National Academy Press. Ch. 4., 113–156 361:. Cooperation communicates kindness and generosity, which combine to make someone an attractive group member. 375: 3642: 3632: 3582: 3226: 3221: 468: 174: 116: 95: 1892:
Kanazawa, Satoshi (2000). "A New Solution to the Collective Action Problem: The Paradox of Voter Turnout".
452: 3636: 3607: 3369: 3176: 2878:"Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence" 2014: 983: 731: 638: 467:
is a type of replenishing resource management dilemma. The dilemma arises when members of a group share a
464: 447: 396: 370: 1930:
Duit, Andreas (2011-12-01). "Patterns of Environmental Collective Action: Some Cross-National Findings".
3597: 3396: 3315: 3206: 3171: 2847:(1999). "Three social dilemmas of workforce diversity in organizations: A social identity perspective". 2432: 1355: 1312: 489:. For example, overfishing in the 1960s and 1970s led to depletion of the previously abundant supply of 479: 2000:"Car versus public transportation? The role of social value orientations in a real-life social dilemma" 948: 674:
Another factor that might affect the weight individuals assign to group outcomes is the possibility of
242: 226: 2105: 1061:
Erhard Friedberg, "Conflict of Interest from the Perspective of the Sociology of Organized Action" in
855:
Close examination reveals that social dilemmas underlie many of the most pressing global issues, from
3602: 3537: 3111: 2749: 2359: 2144: 1598: 50: 2680:
Factors Influencing Cooperation in Commons Dilemmas: A Review of Experimental Psychological Research
2019: 1462:
Allison, S. T.; Kerr, N.L. (1994). "Group correspondence biases and the provision of public goods".
459:
stocks were severely overexploited in the 1970s and 1980s, leading to their abrupt collapse in 1992.
3572: 3522: 3481: 3216: 3089: 860: 523: 478:
The paradigm of the tragedy of the commons first appeared in an 1833 pamphlet by English economist
410: 3656: 3660: 3432: 3360: 3265: 3211: 2975: 2864: 2844: 2765: 2648: 2512: 2393: 2209: 2160: 2110: 1955: 1909: 1622: 1407: 973: 613: 574: 486: 418: 310: 149: 91: 79: 31: 2569: 3713: 3612: 3350: 3280: 3250: 3196: 3075: 3049: 2992: 2967: 2910: 2829: 2810: 2665: 2542: 2485: 2385: 1947: 1778: 1760: 1721: 1703: 1614: 1399: 1175:
Rapoport, A. (1962). The use and misuse of game theory. Scientific American, 207(6), 108–119.
1158: 1036: 928: 908: 903: 881: 630: 548: 345: 213:
This chart illustrates the prisoner's dilemma, one of the most famous examples of game theory.
75: 46: 2923: 2314: 1217: 3161: 2959: 2938: 2900: 2892: 2856: 2793: 2757: 2710: 2702: 2638: 2630: 2609: 2586: 2475: 2465: 2420: 2375: 2367: 2329: 2265: 2238: 2152: 2100: 2092: 2058: 2024: 1939: 1901: 1845: 1805: 1768: 1752: 1711: 1693: 1649: 1606: 1507: 1471: 1442: 1434: 1391: 1148: 1084: 1028: 938: 820: 763: 704: 609: 472: 425: 354: 1822:
Wallace, M.D. (1979). Arms races and escalations: some new evidence. In J.D. Singer (Ed.),
1032: 3330: 3260: 3166: 3136: 3085: 3080: 3064: 3018: 1368: 1325: 963: 913: 898: 634: 160:
The most prominent modern interpretation of the collective action problem can be found in
122: 1292:. Meetings of the Canadian Economics Association, Toronto, June 4–6, 2004. Archived from 758:
Another proposed boundary solution is to remove the social from the dilemma, by means of
2753: 2590: 2363: 2148: 1740: 1602: 1532:"Public Goods: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics | Library of Economics and Liberty" 1340: 3201: 3056: 2480: 2453: 2028: 1849: 1773: 1716: 1681: 993: 988: 872: 856: 743: 626: 577: 329: 317: 183: 1572:
Schroeder, D. A. (1995). An introduction to social dilemmas. In D.A. Schroeder (Ed.),
1531: 3702: 3547: 2868: 2797: 1959: 1943: 1653: 998: 933: 918: 868: 759: 675: 414: 112: 83: 2397: 2114: 1680:
Maaravi, Yossi; Levy, Aharon; Gur, Tamar; Confino, Dan; Segal, Sandra (2021-02-11).
1626: 501: 209: 3527: 3141: 2979: 2769: 2164: 1411: 1339:
Beckenkamp, Martin; Hennig-Schmidt, Heike; Maier-Rigaud, Frank P. (March 4, 2007).
1196: 943: 824: 726: 559: 490: 456: 402: 161: 54: 2505:
Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice
2202:
Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice
1242: 2876:
Van Lange, P. A. M.; Otten, W.; De Bruin, E. M. N. & Joireman, J. A. (1997).
2679: 2634: 1974:"A Majority Says that Government Regulation of Business Does More Harm than Good" 1741:"Culture and COVID-19-related mortality: a cross-sectional study of 50 countries" 3151: 3106: 2963: 2706: 2424: 2229:
Yamagishi, T. (1986). "The Provision of a Sanctioning System as a Public Good".
1438: 1395: 958: 953: 923: 721: 695: 518: 221: 204: 87: 2942: 2896: 2860: 2333: 2269: 2242: 2062: 1756: 1511: 1475: 1088: 3491: 3275: 1698: 1153: 1136: 885: 380: 358: 179: 129: 67: 17: 2643: 2096: 1951: 1764: 1707: 1162: 3577: 3501: 3391: 3386: 3305: 3300: 3181: 2613: 2470: 2371: 1610: 1293: 877: 321: 78:. Examples of phenomena that can be explained using social dilemmas include 71: 2971: 2489: 2389: 1782: 1725: 1618: 1403: 1065:, Anne Peters & Lukas Handschin (eds), Cambridge University Press, 2012 2914: 1836:
Tetlock, P. E. (1983). "Policy-makers' images of international conflict".
86:. The collective action problem can be understood through the analysis of 3552: 3542: 2715: 2187:
Governing the Commons:The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
1447: 555: 2380: 1913: 1864:"Voting matters even if your vote doesn't: A collective action dilemma" 1176: 387:, 2004) (Kopelman 2009) and that these factors influence cooperation. 2905: 2652: 1559: 3320: 3191: 2761: 2156: 1809: 1019:
Brown, Garrett; McLean, Iain; McMillan, Alistair, eds. (2018-01-18).
747: 581: 510: 506: 1905: 1640:
Brechner, K. C. (1977). "An experimental analysis of social traps".
2598:——— & Messick, M. (2000). "Social Dilemmas". 720:
use. Furthermore, numerous experimental and case studies show that
3468: 1824:
Explaining war: Selected papers from the correlates of war project
1341:"Cooperation in Symmetric and Asymmetric Prisoner's Dilemma Games" 500: 451: 379:
base their decisions on what people around them do and use simple
208: 2419:(2): 184–199, also contains a survey of the relevant literature. 3156: 3022: 3013: 2621:
Kollock, P. (1998). "Social dilemmas: Anatomy of cooperation".
1063:
Conflict of Interest in Global, Public and Corporate Governance
3453: 793: 111:
Although he never used the words "collective action problem",
353:
serves as an explanation for why participants cooperate in
53:
for centuries, but was most clearly established in 1965 in
2076:
Razmerita, Liana; Kirchner, Kathrin; Nielsen, Pia (2016).
654:
whether they change the rules of the social dilemma game.
2991:. Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. pp. 51–87. 871:
and her colleagues). For instance, there is a burgeoning
617:
collective action will also lead to individual benefits.
2728:. Vol. 4. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. pp. 11–44. 1998:
Van Vugt, M.; Meertens, R. & Van Lange, P. (1995).
1574:
Social dilemmas: Perspectives on individuals and groups
554:
An example of the deterrence theory in practice is the
2345: 2343: 1348:
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
558:
strategy (employed by both the United States and the
2695:
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
2413:
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
1427:
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
3510: 3467: 3441: 3339: 3249: 3063: 1218:"Game theory II: Prisoner's dilemma | Policonomics" 30:"Social dilemma" redirects here. For the film, see 2678:Kopelman, S., Weber, M, & Messick, D. (2002). 1287:"Alibi games: the Asymmetric Prisoner' s Dilemmas" 2454:"A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas" 649:Factors promoting cooperation in social dilemmas 173:Olson further argued that in the case of a pure 3568:Environmental, social, and corporate governance 2458:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 3034: 1285:Robinson, D.R.; Goforth, D.J. (May 5, 2004). 8: 2931:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2885:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2517:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 2437:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 2322:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2231:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2214:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 2051:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1500:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1464:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1077:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1025:Collective action problem - Oxford Reference 530:their energy source or over their lifespan. 2726:Review of personality and social psychology 424:Pure public goods include services such as 3041: 3027: 3019: 2735:"Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations" 2507:. Princeton University Press. p. 228. 2130:"Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations" 2106:10398/e7995d52-ccc3-4156-b131-41e5908d0e63 823:. Please do not remove this message until 2922:Van Vugt, M. & De Cremer, D. (1999). 2904: 2828:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2714: 2642: 2479: 2469: 2379: 2313:Van Vugt, M. & De Cremer, D. (1999). 2258:Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2104: 2018: 1772: 1715: 1697: 1642:Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1446: 1152: 843:Learn how and when to remove this message 2952:Personality and Social Psychology Review 2577:Dawes, R. M. (1980). "Social dilemmas". 1668:Two Lectures on the Checks to Population 1584: 1582: 1384:Personality and Social Psychology Review 1027:. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press. 819:Relevant discussion may be found on the 248: 3402:Pollutant release and transfer register 1011: 969:Superimposed Schedules of Reinforcement 3014:Homepage of the social-dilemma network 2510: 2430: 2207: 1925: 1923: 1826:(pp. 24-252). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. 1739:Käffer, Arnold; Mahlich, Jörg (2022). 1553: 1551: 1526: 1524: 1522: 1364: 1353: 1321: 1310: 1137:"Collective action: fifty years later" 94:, which results from the provision of 3187:Principles for Responsible Investment 2826:Social Traps and the Problem of Trust 2660:Komorita, S. & Parks, C. (1994). 2503:Poteete, Janssen, and Ostrom (2010). 2200:Poteete, Janssen, and Ostrom (2010). 1130: 1128: 7: 3676: 2452:Ostrom, Elinor (25 September 2007). 2007:Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1558:Banerjee, Abhijit (September 2006). 1177:http://www.jstor.org/stable/24936389 1033:10.1093/acref/9780199670840.001.0001 2601:International Journal of Psychology 2591:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001125 2556:Batson, D. & Ahmad, N. (2008). 603:United States presidential election 3366:Environmental full-cost accounting 2733:Nowak, M. A.; Sigmund, K. (1992). 2128:Nowak, M. A.; Sigmund, K. (1992). 2029:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01594.x 1850:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1983.tb00130.x 686:through managerial interventions. 566:(MAD). Because both countries had 25: 1796:Platt, J (1973). "Social traps". 3675: 3666: 3665: 3655: 3240: 3147:Extended producer responsibility 1944:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00858.x 1560:"Public Action for Public Goods" 798: 433:Replenishing resource management 409:Public goods are goods that are 3356:Eco-Management and Audit Scheme 2664:. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 2085:Journal of Knowledge Management 1868:Princeton University Press Blog 1745:Journal of Public Health Policy 625:Environmental problems such as 3628:Socially responsible marketing 3623:Socially responsible investing 167:The Logic of Collective Action 59:The Logic of Collective Action 49:problem has been addressed in 1: 3719:Political science terminology 3618:Socially responsible business 2298:Poteete; et al. (2010). 2204:. Princeton University Press. 2189:. Cambridge University Press. 270:Prisoner A does not confess ( 254:Prisoner B does not confess ( 3563:Environmental pricing reform 3094:environmental responsibility 2809:. London: Penguin Classics. 2798:10.1016/0047-2727(88)90035-7 2635:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.183 2558:"Altruism: Myth or Reality?" 2539:The evolution of cooperation 1894:American Sociological Review 1870:. 2012-11-05. Archived from 1654:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90054-3 1135:Sandler, Todd (2015-09-01). 564:mutually assured destruction 326:Unscrupulous diner's dilemma 178:public. This contrasts with 3729:Social sciences terminology 3593:Market governance mechanism 3449:Global Reporting Initiative 3419:standards and certification 3326:Social return on investment 2989:Advances in group processes 2964:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_4 2786:Journal of Public Economics 2707:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.06.004 2579:Annual Review of Psychology 2425:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.005 1439:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.06.004 1396:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_4 1021:"Collective action problem" 825:conditions to do so are met 3775: 3533:Community interest company 3477:Community-based monitoring 3311:Genuine progress indicator 2943:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.587 2897:10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.733 2861:10.1177/001872679905201105 2623:Annual Review of Sociology 2334:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.587 2270:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.002 2243:10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.110 2063:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.811 1757:10.1057/s41271-022-00363-9 1686:Frontiers in Public Health 1512:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681 1476:10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.688 1119:A Treatise of Human Nature 1089:10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.479 979:Tragedy of the anticommons 445: 394: 316:Related games include the 202: 135:A Treatise of Human Nature 29: 3651: 3558:Environmental degradation 3407:Sustainability accounting 3271:Ethical positioning index 3238: 2541:. New York: Basic Books. 1699:10.3389/fpubh.2021.627559 1154:10.1007/s11127-015-0252-0 664:social value orientations 586:Egypt–Israel peace treaty 39:collective action problem 3588:Health impact assessment 3459:Sustainability reporting 3428:Toxics Release Inventory 3222:Transparency (behavioral 3197:Social impact assessment 3086:Corporate accountability 2097:10.1108/JKM-03-2016-0112 1838:Journal of Social Issues 637:or cut back on usage of 568:second strike capability 505:Pollution in the sky of 3643:Supply chain management 3583:Global justice movement 3382:profit-and-loss account 2843:Schneider, S. K. & 2614:10.1080/002075900399402 2537:Axelrod, R. A. (1984). 2471:10.1073/pnas.0702288104 2372:10.1126/science.1172133 2283:Ostrom, Elinor (1990). 2185:Ostrom, Elinor (1990). 1611:10.1126/science.1113075 1247:www.e-education.psu.edu 639:non-renewable resources 608:Despite high levels of 376:goal-expectation theory 232: 3608:SDG Publishers Compact 3370:Environmental conflict 3177:Organizational justice 2824:Rothstein, B. (2003). 1363:Cite journal requires 1320:Cite journal requires 1193:levine.sscnet.ucla.edu 1189:"What is Game Theory?" 984:Tragedy of the commons 658:Motivational solutions 514: 465:tragedy of the commons 460: 448:Tragedy of the commons 442:Tragedy of the commons 371:Interdependence Theory 365:Psychological theories 287:Prisoner A confesses ( 282:Prisoner B: goes free 261:Prisoner B confesses ( 214: 145: 27:Type of social dilemma 3754:Social responsibility 3744:Administrative theory 3598:Product certification 3397:Life-cycle assessment 3316:Performance indicator 3207:Social responsibility 3172:Organizational ethics 3102:social responsibility 2686:Kopelman, S. (2009). 2285:Governing the Commons 1798:American Psychologist 504: 480:William Forster Lloyd 455: 336:Evolutionary theories 294:Prisoner A: goes free 212: 140: 3724:Public choice theory 3603:Public participation 3538:Conflict of interest 3128:inequality in the UK 3120:in the United States 3112:Environmental racism 715:Structural solutions 621:Environmental policy 299:Each serves 2 years 51:political philosophy 3573:Ethical consumerism 3523:Benefit corporation 3415:metrics and indices 3217:Sullivan principles 3132:injustice in Europe 2805:Ridley, M. (1997). 2754:1992Natur.355..250N 2464:(39): 15181–15187. 2364:2009Sci...325..419O 2149:1992Natur.355..250N 1978:Pew Research Center 1603:2005Sci...308.1621F 1597:(5728): 1621–1623. 1299:on December 6, 2004 861:conflict escalation 812:of this section is 690:Strategic solutions 524:diminishing returns 397:Volunteer's dilemma 296:Prisoner B: 3 years 280:Prisoner A: 3 years 102:Prominent theorists 3759:Concepts in ethics 3709:Community building 3661:Environment portal 3433:Triple bottom line 3361:Emission inventory 3266:Double bottom line 3212:Stakeholder theory 974:The Social Dilemma 949:Prisoner's dilemma 614:political efficacy 575:Egyptian President 534:Perceptual dilemma 515: 487:resource depletion 461: 419:free-rider problem 311:bargaining problem 277:Each serves 1 year 243:prisoner's dilemma 233:Prisoner's dilemma 227:prisoner's dilemma 215: 92:free-rider problem 80:resource depletion 32:The Social Dilemma 3749:Social psychology 3696: 3695: 3613:Social enterprise 3518:Bangladesh Accord 3378:management system 3374:impact assessment 3351:Carbon accounting 3281:Impact assessment 3232:UN Global Compact 3124:in Western Europe 3076:Aarhus Convention 2998:978-0-89232-572-6 2855:(11): 1445–1468. 2845:Northcraft, G. B. 2816:978-0-670-87449-1 2807:Origins of virtue 2748:(6357): 250–253. 2671:978-0-8133-3003-7 2644:20.500.12749/3338 2548:978-0-465-02122-2 2358:(5939): 419–422. 2143:(6357): 250–253. 1932:Political Studies 1224:. 4 February 2013 929:Identity politics 909:Coordination game 904:Collective action 882:political science 853: 852: 845: 631:biodiversity loss 580:'s 1977 visit to 549:deterrence theory 346:inclusive fitness 303: 302: 76:political science 47:collective action 16:(Redirected from 3766: 3679: 3678: 3669: 3668: 3659: 3244: 3162:Little Eichmanns 3043: 3036: 3029: 3020: 3002: 2983: 2946: 2928: 2918: 2908: 2882: 2872: 2839: 2820: 2801: 2780: 2778: 2772:. Archived from 2762:10.1038/355250a0 2739: 2729: 2720: 2718: 2692: 2675: 2656: 2646: 2617: 2594: 2573: 2568:. Archived from 2562:In-Mind Magazine 2552: 2523: 2522: 2516: 2508: 2500: 2494: 2493: 2483: 2473: 2449: 2443: 2442: 2436: 2428: 2408: 2402: 2401: 2383: 2347: 2338: 2337: 2319: 2310: 2304: 2303: 2300:Working Together 2295: 2289: 2288: 2280: 2274: 2273: 2253: 2247: 2246: 2226: 2220: 2219: 2213: 2205: 2197: 2191: 2190: 2182: 2176: 2175: 2173: 2167:. Archived from 2157:10.1038/355250a0 2134: 2125: 2119: 2118: 2108: 2091:(6): 1225–1246. 2082: 2073: 2067: 2066: 2046: 2040: 2039: 2037: 2031:. Archived from 2022: 2004: 1995: 1989: 1988: 1986: 1985: 1970: 1964: 1963: 1927: 1918: 1917: 1889: 1883: 1882: 1880: 1879: 1860: 1854: 1853: 1833: 1827: 1820: 1814: 1813: 1810:10.1037/h0035723 1793: 1787: 1786: 1776: 1736: 1730: 1729: 1719: 1701: 1677: 1671: 1664: 1658: 1657: 1637: 1631: 1630: 1586: 1577: 1570: 1564: 1563: 1555: 1546: 1545: 1543: 1542: 1528: 1517: 1515: 1495: 1489: 1486: 1480: 1479: 1459: 1453: 1452: 1450: 1422: 1416: 1415: 1379: 1373: 1372: 1366: 1361: 1359: 1351: 1345: 1336: 1330: 1329: 1323: 1318: 1316: 1308: 1306: 1304: 1298: 1291: 1282: 1276: 1272: 1266: 1263: 1257: 1256: 1254: 1253: 1239: 1233: 1232: 1230: 1229: 1222:policonomics.com 1214: 1208: 1207: 1205: 1204: 1195:. Archived from 1185: 1179: 1173: 1167: 1166: 1156: 1147:(3–4): 195–216. 1132: 1123: 1122: 1114: 1108: 1107: 1102:Hobbes, Thomas. 1099: 1093: 1092: 1072: 1066: 1059: 1053: 1052: 1050: 1049: 1016: 939:Nash equilibrium 848: 841: 837: 834: 828: 802: 801: 794: 764:locus of control 705:Nash equilibrium 635:carbon emissions 610:political apathy 473:overexploitation 426:national defense 249: 21: 3774: 3773: 3769: 3768: 3767: 3765: 3764: 3763: 3739:Group processes 3734:Social concepts 3699: 3698: 3697: 3692: 3647: 3506: 3463: 3437: 3342: 3335: 3331:Whole-life cost 3261:Corporate crime 3252: 3245: 3236: 3167:Loss and damage 3137:Ethical banking 3081:Climate justice 3068: 3059: 3047: 3010: 3005: 2999: 2986: 2949: 2926: 2921: 2880: 2875: 2849:Human Relations 2842: 2836: 2823: 2817: 2804: 2783: 2776: 2737: 2732: 2723: 2690: 2685: 2672: 2662:Social Dilemmas 2659: 2620: 2597: 2576: 2555: 2549: 2536: 2532: 2530:Further reading 2527: 2526: 2509: 2502: 2501: 2497: 2451: 2450: 2446: 2429: 2410: 2409: 2405: 2349: 2348: 2341: 2317: 2312: 2311: 2307: 2297: 2296: 2292: 2282: 2281: 2277: 2255: 2254: 2250: 2228: 2227: 2223: 2206: 2199: 2198: 2194: 2184: 2183: 2179: 2171: 2132: 2127: 2126: 2122: 2080: 2075: 2074: 2070: 2048: 2047: 2043: 2035: 2020:10.1.1.612.8158 2002: 1997: 1996: 1992: 1983: 1981: 1972: 1971: 1967: 1929: 1928: 1921: 1906:10.2307/2657465 1891: 1890: 1886: 1877: 1875: 1862: 1861: 1857: 1835: 1834: 1830: 1821: 1817: 1795: 1794: 1790: 1738: 1737: 1733: 1679: 1678: 1674: 1665: 1661: 1639: 1638: 1634: 1588: 1587: 1580: 1571: 1567: 1557: 1556: 1549: 1540: 1538: 1536:www.econlib.org 1530: 1529: 1520: 1497: 1496: 1492: 1487: 1483: 1461: 1460: 1456: 1424: 1423: 1419: 1381: 1380: 1376: 1362: 1352: 1344:(preprint link) 1343: 1338: 1337: 1333: 1319: 1309: 1302: 1300: 1296: 1289: 1284: 1283: 1279: 1273: 1269: 1264: 1260: 1251: 1249: 1241: 1240: 1236: 1227: 1225: 1216: 1215: 1211: 1202: 1200: 1187: 1186: 1182: 1174: 1170: 1134: 1133: 1126: 1116: 1115: 1111: 1101: 1100: 1096: 1074: 1073: 1069: 1060: 1056: 1047: 1045: 1043: 1018: 1017: 1013: 1008: 1003: 964:Strategic games 914:Decision theory 899:Belling the Cat 894: 849: 838: 832: 829: 818: 803: 799: 792: 717: 692: 660: 651: 623: 599: 594: 545: 536: 499: 450: 444: 435: 399: 393: 367: 338: 295: 281: 235: 207: 201: 196: 182:theory of the " 158: 123:state of nature 109: 104: 35: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 3772: 3770: 3762: 3761: 3756: 3751: 3746: 3741: 3736: 3731: 3726: 3721: 3716: 3711: 3701: 3700: 3694: 3693: 3691: 3690: 3685: 3673: 3663: 3652: 3649: 3648: 3646: 3645: 3640: 3630: 3625: 3620: 3615: 3610: 3605: 3600: 3595: 3590: 3585: 3580: 3575: 3570: 3565: 3560: 3555: 3550: 3545: 3540: 3535: 3530: 3525: 3520: 3514: 3512: 3508: 3507: 3505: 3504: 3499: 3489: 3479: 3473: 3471: 3465: 3464: 3462: 3461: 3456: 3454:GxP guidelines 3451: 3445: 3443: 3439: 3438: 3436: 3435: 3430: 3425: 3404: 3399: 3394: 3389: 3384: 3363: 3358: 3353: 3347: 3345: 3337: 3336: 3334: 3333: 3328: 3323: 3318: 3313: 3308: 3303: 3298: 3292: 3287: 3278: 3273: 3268: 3263: 3257: 3255: 3247: 3246: 3239: 3237: 3235: 3234: 3229: 3224: 3219: 3214: 3209: 3204: 3202:Social justice 3199: 3194: 3189: 3184: 3179: 3174: 3169: 3164: 3159: 3154: 3149: 3144: 3139: 3134: 3109: 3104: 3098:responsibility 3083: 3078: 3072: 3070: 3061: 3060: 3057:accountability 3048: 3046: 3045: 3038: 3031: 3023: 3017: 3016: 3009: 3008:External links 3006: 3004: 3003: 2997: 2984: 2958:(3): 281–307. 2947: 2937:(4): 587–599. 2919: 2891:(4): 733–746. 2873: 2840: 2835:978-0521612821 2834: 2821: 2815: 2802: 2792:(3): 309–332. 2781: 2779:on 2011-06-16. 2730: 2721: 2683: 2676: 2670: 2657: 2618: 2608:(2): 111–116. 2595: 2574: 2572:on 2008-05-17. 2553: 2547: 2533: 2531: 2528: 2525: 2524: 2495: 2444: 2403: 2339: 2328:(4): 587–599. 2305: 2290: 2275: 2264:(2): 147–162. 2248: 2237:(1): 110–116. 2221: 2192: 2177: 2174:on 2011-06-16. 2120: 2068: 2057:(5): 811–819. 2041: 2038:on 2011-07-15. 2013:(3): 358–378. 1990: 1965: 1938:(4): 900–920. 1919: 1900:(3): 433–442. 1884: 1855: 1828: 1815: 1804:(8): 641–651. 1788: 1751:(3): 413–430. 1731: 1672: 1659: 1648:(6): 552–564. 1632: 1578: 1565: 1547: 1518: 1506:(4): 681–706. 1490: 1481: 1470:(4): 688–698. 1454: 1417: 1390:(3): 281–307. 1374: 1365:|journal= 1331: 1322:|journal= 1277: 1267: 1258: 1234: 1209: 1180: 1168: 1124: 1109: 1094: 1083:(3): 479–497. 1067: 1054: 1041: 1010: 1009: 1007: 1004: 1002: 1001: 996: 994:Wicked problem 991: 989:Voting paradox 986: 981: 976: 971: 966: 961: 956: 951: 946: 941: 936: 931: 926: 921: 916: 911: 906: 901: 895: 893: 890: 873:neuroeconomics 857:climate change 851: 850: 806: 804: 797: 791: 788: 744:overharvesting 716: 713: 691: 688: 659: 656: 650: 647: 627:climate change 622: 619: 598: 595: 593: 590: 578:Anwar El Sadat 544: 541: 535: 532: 498: 495: 446:Main article: 443: 440: 434: 431: 392: 389: 366: 363: 337: 334: 330:Centipede game 318:Snowdrift game 301: 300: 297: 292: 284: 283: 278: 275: 267: 266: 259: 252: 234: 231: 200: 197: 195: 192: 184:invisible hand 162:Mancur Olson's 157: 156:Modern thought 154: 108: 105: 103: 100: 55:Mancur Olson's 43:social dilemma 26: 24: 18:Social dilemma 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3771: 3760: 3757: 3755: 3752: 3750: 3747: 3745: 3742: 3740: 3737: 3735: 3732: 3730: 3727: 3725: 3722: 3720: 3717: 3715: 3712: 3710: 3707: 3706: 3704: 3689: 3688:Organizations 3686: 3684: 3683: 3674: 3672: 3664: 3662: 3658: 3654: 3653: 3650: 3644: 3641: 3638: 3634: 3631: 3629: 3626: 3624: 3621: 3619: 3616: 3614: 3611: 3609: 3606: 3604: 3601: 3599: 3596: 3594: 3591: 3589: 3586: 3584: 3581: 3579: 3576: 3574: 3571: 3569: 3566: 3564: 3561: 3559: 3556: 3554: 3551: 3549: 3548:Disinvestment 3546: 3544: 3541: 3539: 3536: 3534: 3531: 3529: 3526: 3524: 3521: 3519: 3516: 3515: 3513: 3509: 3503: 3500: 3497: 3496:certification 3493: 3490: 3487: 3486:certification 3483: 3482:Environmental 3480: 3478: 3475: 3474: 3472: 3470: 3466: 3460: 3457: 3455: 3452: 3450: 3447: 3446: 3444: 3440: 3434: 3431: 3429: 3426: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3412: 3408: 3405: 3403: 3400: 3398: 3395: 3393: 3390: 3388: 3385: 3383: 3379: 3375: 3371: 3367: 3364: 3362: 3359: 3357: 3354: 3352: 3349: 3348: 3346: 3344: 3341:Environmental 3338: 3332: 3329: 3327: 3324: 3322: 3319: 3317: 3314: 3312: 3309: 3307: 3304: 3302: 3299: 3296: 3293: 3291: 3288: 3286: 3285:environmental 3282: 3279: 3277: 3274: 3272: 3269: 3267: 3264: 3262: 3259: 3258: 3256: 3254: 3248: 3243: 3233: 3230: 3228: 3225: 3223: 3220: 3218: 3215: 3213: 3210: 3208: 3205: 3203: 3200: 3198: 3195: 3193: 3190: 3188: 3185: 3183: 3180: 3178: 3175: 3173: 3170: 3168: 3165: 3163: 3160: 3158: 3155: 3153: 3150: 3148: 3145: 3143: 3140: 3138: 3135: 3133: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3113: 3110: 3108: 3105: 3103: 3099: 3095: 3091: 3087: 3084: 3082: 3079: 3077: 3074: 3073: 3071: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3055: 3054:environmental 3051: 3044: 3039: 3037: 3032: 3030: 3025: 3024: 3021: 3015: 3012: 3011: 3007: 3000: 2994: 2990: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2948: 2944: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2925: 2920: 2916: 2912: 2907: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2890: 2886: 2879: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2841: 2837: 2831: 2827: 2822: 2818: 2812: 2808: 2803: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2782: 2775: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2736: 2731: 2727: 2722: 2717: 2716:2027.42/50454 2712: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2689: 2684: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2667: 2663: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2645: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2602: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2554: 2550: 2544: 2540: 2535: 2534: 2529: 2520: 2514: 2506: 2499: 2496: 2491: 2487: 2482: 2477: 2472: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2455: 2448: 2445: 2440: 2434: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2407: 2404: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2387: 2382: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2346: 2344: 2340: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2316: 2309: 2306: 2301: 2294: 2291: 2286: 2279: 2276: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2252: 2249: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2225: 2222: 2217: 2211: 2203: 2196: 2193: 2188: 2181: 2178: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2131: 2124: 2121: 2116: 2112: 2107: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2079: 2072: 2069: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2045: 2042: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2021: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2001: 1994: 1991: 1979: 1975: 1969: 1966: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1926: 1924: 1920: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1888: 1885: 1874:on 2018-12-09 1873: 1869: 1865: 1859: 1856: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1832: 1829: 1825: 1819: 1816: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1792: 1789: 1784: 1780: 1775: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1735: 1732: 1727: 1723: 1718: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1700: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1676: 1673: 1669: 1663: 1660: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1636: 1633: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1585: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1569: 1566: 1561: 1554: 1552: 1548: 1537: 1533: 1527: 1525: 1523: 1519: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1494: 1491: 1485: 1482: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1458: 1455: 1449: 1448:2027.42/50454 1444: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1421: 1418: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1378: 1375: 1370: 1357: 1349: 1342: 1335: 1332: 1327: 1314: 1295: 1288: 1281: 1278: 1271: 1268: 1262: 1259: 1248: 1244: 1238: 1235: 1223: 1219: 1213: 1210: 1199:on 2018-04-16 1198: 1194: 1190: 1184: 1181: 1178: 1172: 1169: 1164: 1160: 1155: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1141:Public Choice 1138: 1131: 1129: 1125: 1120: 1117:Hume, David. 1113: 1110: 1105: 1098: 1095: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1071: 1068: 1064: 1058: 1055: 1044: 1042:9780199670840 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1015: 1012: 1005: 1000: 999:Zero-sum game 997: 995: 992: 990: 987: 985: 982: 980: 977: 975: 972: 970: 967: 965: 962: 960: 957: 955: 952: 950: 947: 945: 942: 940: 937: 935: 934:Moral economy 932: 930: 927: 925: 922: 920: 919:Elinor Ostrom 917: 915: 912: 910: 907: 905: 902: 900: 897: 896: 891: 889: 887: 883: 879: 874: 870: 869:Elinor Ostrom 864: 862: 858: 847: 844: 836: 826: 822: 816: 815: 811: 805: 796: 795: 789: 787: 785: 781: 777: 771: 767: 765: 761: 760:privatization 756: 752: 749: 745: 740: 737: 733: 728: 723: 714: 712: 708: 706: 700: 697: 689: 687: 683: 679: 677: 676:communication 672: 668: 665: 657: 655: 648: 646: 642: 640: 636: 632: 628: 620: 618: 615: 611: 606: 604: 596: 591: 589: 587: 583: 579: 576: 571: 569: 565: 561: 557: 552: 550: 542: 540: 533: 531: 527: 525: 520: 512: 508: 503: 496: 494: 492: 488: 483: 481: 476: 474: 470: 466: 458: 454: 449: 441: 439: 432: 430: 427: 422: 420: 416: 415:nonexcludable 412: 407: 404: 398: 390: 388: 386: 382: 377: 372: 364: 362: 360: 356: 352: 347: 343: 335: 333: 331: 327: 323: 319: 314: 312: 306: 298: 293: 290: 286: 285: 279: 276: 273: 269: 268: 264: 260: 257: 253: 251: 250: 247: 244: 239: 230: 228: 223: 219: 211: 206: 198: 193: 191: 187: 185: 181: 176: 171: 169: 168: 163: 155: 153: 151: 144: 139: 137: 136: 131: 127: 124: 120: 119: 114: 113:Thomas Hobbes 107:Early thought 106: 101: 99: 97: 93: 89: 85: 84:voter turnout 81: 77: 73: 69: 63: 61: 60: 56: 52: 48: 44: 40: 33: 19: 3680: 3553:Eco-labeling 3528:Child labour 3423:supply chain 3421: / 3417: / 3413: / 3409: / 3380: / 3376: / 3372: / 3368: / 3142:Ethical code 3130: / 3126: / 3122: / 3118: / 3114: / 3100: / 3096: / 3092: / 3088: / 2988: 2955: 2951: 2934: 2930: 2888: 2884: 2852: 2848: 2825: 2806: 2789: 2785: 2774:the original 2745: 2741: 2725: 2698: 2694: 2661: 2626: 2622: 2605: 2599: 2582: 2578: 2570:the original 2565: 2561: 2538: 2504: 2498: 2461: 2457: 2447: 2433:cite journal 2416: 2412: 2406: 2355: 2351: 2325: 2321: 2308: 2299: 2293: 2284: 2278: 2261: 2257: 2251: 2234: 2230: 2224: 2201: 2195: 2186: 2180: 2169:the original 2140: 2136: 2123: 2088: 2084: 2071: 2054: 2050: 2044: 2033:the original 2010: 2006: 1993: 1982:. Retrieved 1980:. 2012-03-07 1977: 1968: 1935: 1931: 1897: 1893: 1887: 1876:. Retrieved 1872:the original 1867: 1858: 1841: 1837: 1831: 1823: 1818: 1801: 1797: 1791: 1748: 1744: 1734: 1689: 1685: 1675: 1667: 1666:W F Lloyd - 1662: 1645: 1641: 1635: 1594: 1590: 1573: 1568: 1539:. Retrieved 1535: 1503: 1499: 1493: 1484: 1467: 1463: 1457: 1430: 1426: 1420: 1387: 1383: 1377: 1356:cite journal 1334: 1313:cite journal 1301:. Retrieved 1294:the original 1280: 1270: 1261: 1250:. Retrieved 1246: 1237: 1226:. Retrieved 1221: 1212: 1201:. Retrieved 1197:the original 1192: 1183: 1171: 1144: 1140: 1118: 1112: 1103: 1097: 1080: 1076: 1070: 1062: 1057: 1046:. Retrieved 1024: 1014: 944:Non-zero-sum 865: 854: 839: 830: 808: 783: 779: 775: 772: 768: 757: 753: 741: 735: 727:public goods 718: 709: 701: 693: 684: 680: 673: 669: 661: 652: 643: 624: 607: 600: 572: 560:Soviet Union 553: 546: 537: 528: 516: 497:Social traps 491:Atlantic Cod 484: 477: 462: 457:Atlantic cod 436: 423: 408: 403:public goods 400: 391:Public goods 384: 368: 342:selfish gene 339: 315: 307: 304: 288: 271: 262: 255: 240: 236: 220: 216: 188: 180:Adam Smith's 172: 165: 159: 146: 141: 133: 128: 117: 110: 96:public goods 64: 57: 42: 38: 36: 3633:Stakeholder 3411:measurement 3152:Externality 3107:Dirty hands 2701:: 153–163. 2629:: 183–214. 2585:: 169–193. 2381:11059/14638 1576:(pp. 1–14). 1433:: 153–163. 959:Social trap 954:Rationality 924:Game theory 790:Conclusions 776:sub-optimal 732:sanctioning 722:cooperation 696:Tit for tat 592:In politics 543:In conflict 519:social trap 469:common good 351:Reciprocity 222:Game theory 205:Game theory 199:Game theory 175:public good 88:game theory 3703:Categories 3637:engagement 3492:Fair trade 3343:accounting 3276:Higg Index 3253:accounting 3069:principles 2906:1871/17714 1984:2018-04-18 1878:2018-04-18 1692:: 627559. 1541:2018-04-18 1252:2018-04-18 1228:2018-04-18 1203:2018-04-18 1048:2018-04-11 1006:References 886:psychology 810:neutrality 395:See also: 381:heuristics 359:reputation 328:, and the 272:cooperates 256:cooperates 203:See also: 164:1965 book 130:David Hume 68:psychology 3578:Euthenics 3543:Disasters 3502:ISO 19011 3442:Reporting 3392:ISO 14031 3387:ISO 14000 3306:ISO 45001 3301:ISO 26000 3182:Pollution 3116:in Russia 3090:behaviour 2869:145217407 2513:cite book 2210:cite book 2015:CiteSeerX 1960:142706143 1952:1467-9248 1844:: 67–86. 1765:0197-5897 1708:2296-2565 1163:0048-5829 1104:Leviathan 878:economics 821:talk page 736:graduated 322:Stag hunt 150:free ride 118:Leviathan 72:economics 3714:Dilemmas 3671:Category 3469:Auditing 3290:equality 2972:15454350 2490:17881578 2398:39710673 2390:19628857 2115:36485882 1783:35995942 1726:33643992 1627:45088691 1619:15947186 1404:15454350 892:See also 833:May 2024 814:disputed 556:Cold War 411:nonrival 194:Theories 90:and the 82:and low 3682:Commons 3635: ( 3511:Related 3494: ( 3484: ( 3283: ( 3227:social) 2980:1525372 2915:9325591 2770:4281385 2750:Bibcode 2481:2000497 2360:Bibcode 2352:Science 2165:4281385 2145:Bibcode 1914:2657465 1774:9395903 1717:7905028 1599:Bibcode 1591:Science 1412:1525372 289:defects 263:defects 3321:SA8000 3295:social 3251:Social 3192:Racism 3065:Ethics 3050:Social 2995:  2978:  2970:  2913:  2867:  2832:  2813:  2768:  2742:Nature 2668:  2653:223479 2651:  2545:  2488:  2478:  2396:  2388:  2163:  2137:Nature 2113:  2017:  1958:  1950:  1912:  1781:  1771:  1763:  1724:  1714:  1706:  1670:(1833) 1625:  1617:  1410:  1402:  1303:May 2, 1275:Press. 1161:  1039:  884:, and 780:failed 748:leader 597:Voting 582:Israel 511:Greece 507:Athens 385:et al. 324:, the 74:, and 2976:S2CID 2927:(PDF) 2881:(PDF) 2865:S2CID 2777:(PDF) 2766:S2CID 2738:(PDF) 2691:(PDF) 2649:JSTOR 2394:S2CID 2318:(PDF) 2172:(PDF) 2161:S2CID 2133:(PDF) 2111:S2CID 2081:(PDF) 2036:(PDF) 2003:(PDF) 1956:S2CID 1910:JSTOR 1623:S2CID 1408:S2CID 1297:(PDF) 1290:(PDF) 562:) of 355:dyads 3157:Harm 3052:and 2993:ISBN 2968:PMID 2911:PMID 2830:ISBN 2811:ISBN 2666:ISBN 2543:ISBN 2519:link 2486:PMID 2439:link 2386:PMID 2216:link 1948:ISSN 1779:PMID 1761:ISSN 1722:PMID 1704:ISSN 1615:PMID 1400:PMID 1369:help 1326:help 1305:2020 1159:ISSN 1037:ISBN 807:The 463:The 413:and 241:The 3067:and 2960:doi 2939:doi 2901:hdl 2893:doi 2857:doi 2794:doi 2758:doi 2746:355 2711:hdl 2703:doi 2699:108 2639:hdl 2631:doi 2610:doi 2587:doi 2476:PMC 2466:doi 2462:104 2421:doi 2417:101 2376:hdl 2368:doi 2356:325 2330:doi 2266:doi 2239:doi 2153:doi 2141:355 2101:hdl 2093:doi 2059:doi 2025:doi 1940:doi 1902:doi 1846:doi 1806:doi 1769:PMC 1753:doi 1712:PMC 1694:doi 1650:doi 1607:doi 1595:308 1508:doi 1472:doi 1443:hdl 1435:doi 1431:108 1392:doi 1149:doi 1145:164 1085:doi 1029:doi 859:to 784:not 778:or 41:or 3705:: 2974:. 2966:. 2954:. 2935:76 2933:. 2929:. 2909:. 2899:. 2889:73 2887:. 2883:. 2863:. 2853:52 2851:. 2790:35 2788:. 2764:. 2756:. 2744:. 2740:. 2709:. 2697:. 2693:. 2647:. 2637:. 2627:24 2625:. 2606:35 2604:. 2583:31 2581:. 2564:. 2560:. 2515:}} 2511:{{ 2484:. 2474:. 2460:. 2456:. 2435:}} 2431:{{ 2415:. 2392:. 2384:. 2374:. 2366:. 2354:. 2342:^ 2326:76 2324:. 2320:. 2262:42 2260:. 2235:51 2233:. 2212:}} 2208:{{ 2159:. 2151:. 2139:. 2135:. 2109:. 2099:. 2089:20 2087:. 2083:. 2055:54 2053:. 2023:. 2011:25 2009:. 2005:. 1976:. 1954:. 1946:. 1936:59 1934:. 1922:^ 1908:. 1898:65 1896:. 1866:. 1842:39 1840:. 1802:28 1800:. 1777:. 1767:. 1759:. 1749:43 1747:. 1743:. 1720:. 1710:. 1702:. 1688:. 1684:. 1646:13 1644:. 1621:. 1613:. 1605:. 1593:. 1581:^ 1550:^ 1534:. 1521:^ 1504:65 1502:. 1468:66 1466:. 1441:. 1429:. 1406:. 1398:. 1386:. 1360:: 1358:}} 1354:{{ 1346:. 1317:: 1315:}} 1311:{{ 1245:. 1220:. 1191:. 1157:. 1143:. 1139:. 1127:^ 1081:71 1079:. 1035:. 1023:. 888:. 880:, 766:. 629:, 588:. 517:A 509:, 475:. 401:A 332:. 320:, 313:. 291:) 274:) 265:) 70:, 62:. 37:A 3639:) 3498:) 3488:) 3297:) 3042:e 3035:t 3028:v 3001:. 2982:. 2962:: 2956:8 2945:. 2941:: 2917:. 2903:: 2895:: 2871:. 2859:: 2838:. 2819:. 2800:. 2796:: 2760:: 2752:: 2719:. 2713:: 2705:: 2674:. 2655:. 2641:: 2633:: 2616:. 2612:: 2593:. 2589:: 2566:6 2551:. 2521:) 2492:. 2468:: 2441:) 2427:. 2423:: 2400:. 2378:: 2370:: 2362:: 2336:. 2332:: 2302:. 2287:. 2272:. 2268:: 2245:. 2241:: 2218:) 2155:: 2147:: 2117:. 2103:: 2095:: 2065:. 2061:: 2027:: 1987:. 1962:. 1942:: 1916:. 1904:: 1881:. 1852:. 1848:: 1812:. 1808:: 1785:. 1755:: 1728:. 1696:: 1690:9 1656:. 1652:: 1629:. 1609:: 1601:: 1562:. 1544:. 1514:. 1510:: 1478:. 1474:: 1451:. 1445:: 1437:: 1414:. 1394:: 1388:8 1371:) 1367:( 1350:. 1328:) 1324:( 1307:. 1255:. 1231:. 1206:. 1165:. 1151:: 1121:. 1106:. 1091:. 1087:: 1051:. 1031:: 846:) 840:( 835:) 831:( 827:. 817:. 513:. 258:) 34:. 20:)

Index

Social dilemma
The Social Dilemma
collective action
political philosophy
Mancur Olson's
The Logic of Collective Action
psychology
economics
political science
resource depletion
voter turnout
game theory
free-rider problem
public goods
Thomas Hobbes
Leviathan
state of nature
David Hume
A Treatise of Human Nature
free ride
Mancur Olson's
The Logic of Collective Action
public good
Adam Smith's
invisible hand
Game theory

Game theory
prisoner's dilemma
prisoner's dilemma

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑