421:, comes into play. For instance, a company could put on a fireworks display and charge an admittance price of $ 10, but if community members could all view the fireworks display from their homes, most would choose not to pay the admittance fee. Thus, the majority of individuals would choose to free ride, discouraging the company from putting on another fireworks show in the future. Even though the fireworks display was surely beneficial to each of the individuals, they relied on those paying the admittance fee to finance the show. If everybody had assumed this position, however, the company putting on the show would not have been able to procure the funds necessary to buy the fireworks that provided enjoyment for so many individuals. This situation is indicative of a collective action problem because the individual incentive to free ride conflicts with the collective desire of the group to pay for a fireworks show for all to enjoy.
406:
benefit from them and one person's use of them does not hinder another person's use of them. An example is public broadcasting that relies on contributions from viewers. Since no single viewer is essential for providing the service, viewers can reap the benefits of the service without paying anything for it. If not enough people contribute, the service cannot be provided. In economics, the literature around public goods dilemmas refers to the phenomenon as the free rider problem. The economic approach is broadly applicable and can refer to the free-riding that accompanies any sort of public good. In social psychology, the literature refers to this phenomenon as social loafing. Whereas free-riding is generally used to describe public goods, social loafing refers specifically to the tendency for people to exert less effort when in a group than when working alone.
229:. The classical prisoner's dilemma model consists of two players who are accused of a crime. If Player A decides to betray Player B, Player A will receive no prison time while Player B receives a substantial prison sentence, and vice versa. If both players choose to keep quiet about the crime, they will both receive reduced prison sentences, and if both players turn the other in, they will each receive more substantial sentences. It would appear in this situation that each player should choose to stay quiet so that both will receive reduced sentences. In actuality, however, players who are unable to communicate will both choose to betray each other, as they each have an individual incentive to do so in order to receive a commuted sentence.
667:
cooperation—maximizing joint outcomes. The first two orientations are referred to as proself orientations and the third as a prosocial orientation. There is much support for the idea that prosocial and proself individuals behave differently when confronted with a social dilemma in the laboratory as well as the field. People with prosocial orientations weigh the moral implications of their decisions more and see cooperation as the most preferable choice in a social dilemma. When there are conditions of scarcity, like a water shortage, prosocials harvest less from a common resource. Similarly prosocials are more concerned about the environmental consequences of, for example, taking the car or public transport.
730:
Experimental research suggests that particularly low trust individuals are willing to invest money in punishment systems. A considerable portion of people are quite willing to punish non-cooperators even if they personally do not profit. Some researchers even suggest that altruistic punishment is an evolved mechanism for human cooperation. A third limitation is that punishment and reward systems might undermine people's voluntary cooperative intention. Some people get a "warm glow" from cooperation and the provision of selective incentives might crowd out their cooperative intention. Similarly the presence of a negative
482:. According to Lloyd, "If a person puts more cattle into his own field, the amount of the subsistence which they consume is all deducted from that which was at the command, of his original stock; and if, before, there was no more than a sufficiency of pasture, he reaps no benefit from the additional cattle, what is gained in one way being lost in another. But if he puts more cattle on a common, the food which they consume forms a deduction which is shared between all the cattle, as well that of others as his own, in proportion to their number, and only a small part of it is taken from his own cattle".
725:
information, know one another, have effective arenas for conflict resolution, and are managing social and ecological systems that have well-defined boundaries or are easily monitorable. Yet implementation of reward and punishment systems can be problematic for various reasons. First, there are significant costs associated with creating and administering sanction systems. Providing selective rewards and punishments requires support institutions to monitor the activities of both cooperators and non-cooperators, which can be quite expensive to maintain. Second, these systems are themselves
493:. By 1992, the population of cod had completely collapsed because fishers had not left enough fish to repopulate the species. Another example is the higher rates of COVID-19 cases of sickness and deaths in individualistic (vs. collectivists) countries. (Note that more recent research from 2022 suggest that individualistic societies are associated with lower COVID-19-related mortality rates. This finding contradicts previous studies that supported the popular narrative that collectivistic societies with an obedient population are better positioned to manage the pandemic.)
429:
resources and finance projects that benefit the collective group. The ability of communities to successfully contribute to public welfare depends on the size of the group, the power or influence of group members, the tastes and preferences of individuals within the group, and the distribution of benefits among group members. When a group is too large or the benefits of collective action are not tangible to individual members, the collective action problem results in a lack of cooperation that makes the provision of public goods difficult.
453:
751:
extremely important in citizen's willingness to accept authorities. Other research emphasizes a greater motivation for groups to successfully self-organize, without the need for an external authority base, when they do place a high value on the resources in question but, again, before the resources are severely overharvested. An external "authority" is not presumed to be the solution in these cases, however effective self-organization and collective governance and care for the resource base is.
3242:
605:. This statistic may discourage individuals from exercising their democratic right to vote, as they believe they could not possibly affect the results of an election. If everybody adopted this view and decided not to vote, however, democracy would collapse. This situation results in a collective action problem, as any single individual is incentivized to choose to stay home from the polls since their vote is very unlikely to make a real difference in the outcome of an election.
645:
or favor even more stringent regulations. This illustrates the way the collective problem hinders group action on environmental issues: when an individual is directly affected by an issue such as food and water quality, they will favor regulations, but when an individual cannot see a great impact from their personal carbon emissions or waste accumulation, they will generally tend to disagree with laws that encourage them to cut back on environmentally-harmful activities.
218:
choice theory, expected utility theory). Game theory assumes that individuals are rational actors motivated to maximize their utilities. Utility is often narrowly defined in terms of people's economic self-interest. Game theory thus predicts a non-cooperative outcome in a social dilemma. Although this is a useful starting premise there are many circumstances in which people may deviate from individual rationality.
3667:
502:
210:
3657:
762:. This restructuring of incentives would remove the temptation to place individual needs above group needs. However, it is not easy to privatize moveable resources such as fish, water, and clean air. Privatization also raises concerns about social justice as not everyone may be able to get an equal share. Privatization might also erode people's intrinsic motivation to cooperate, by externalizing the
800:
551:, the best strategy to take in conflict is to show signs of strength and willingness to use force if necessary. This approach is intended to dissuade attacks before they happen. Conversely, the conflict spiral view holds that deterrence strategies increase hostilities and defensiveness and that a clear demonstration of peaceful intentions is the most effective way to avoid escalation.
633:, and waste accumulation can be described as collective action problems. Since these issues are connected to the everyday actions of vast numbers of people, vast numbers of people are also required to mitigate the effects of these environmental problems. Without governmental regulation, however, individual people or businesses are unlikely to take the actions necessary to reduce
417:. A good is said to be nonrival if its consumption by one consumer does not in any way impact its consumption by another consumer. Additionally, a good is said to be nonexcludable if those who do not pay for the good cannot be kept from enjoying the benefits of the good. The nonexcludability aspect of public goods is where one facet of the collective action problem, known as the
170:. In it, he addressed the accepted belief at the time by sociologists and political scientists that groups were necessary to further the interests of their members. Olson argued that individual rationality does not necessarily result in group rationality, as members of a group may have conflicting interests that do not represent the best interests of the overall group.
755:
dilemma into smaller more manageable parts) is often an effective tool in raising cooperation under such circumstances. Additional research on governance shows that group size has a curvilinear effect, since at low numbers, governance groups may also not have enough people to effectively research, manage, and administer the resource system or the governance process.
3677:
711:
preferred as collaborative partners, romantic partners, and group leaders. This only occurs however when people's social dilemma choices are monitored by others. Public acts of altruism and cooperation like charity giving, philanthropy, and bystander intervention are probably manifestations of reputation-based cooperation.
875:
literature studying brain correlates of decision-making in social dilemmas with neuroscience methods. The interdisciplinary nature of the study of social dilemmas does not fit into the conventional distinctions between fields, and demands a multidisciplinary approach that transcends divisions between
698:
strategy (TFT). TFT is characterized by first making a cooperative move while the next move mimics the decision of the partner. Thus, if a partner does not cooperate, you copy this move until your partner starts to cooperate. Computer tournaments in which different strategies were pitted against each
616:
to be higher than it actually is, stopping millions of
Americans from believing their vote does not matter and staying home from the polls. Thus, it appears collective action problems can be resolved not just by tangible benefits to individuals participating in group action, but by a mere belief that
245:
is a simple game that serves as the basis for research on social dilemmas. The premise of the game is that two partners in crime are imprisoned separately and each are offered leniency if they provide evidence against the other. As seen in the table below, the optimal individual outcome is to testify
710:
Even when partners might not meet again it could be strategically wise to cooperate. When people can selectively choose whom to interact with it might pay to be seen as a cooperator. Research shows that cooperators create better opportunities for themselves than non-cooperators: They are selectively
702:
However, TFT is quite an unforgiving strategy, and in noisy real-world dilemmas a more forgiving strategy has its own advantages. Such a strategy is known as
Generous-tit-for-tat (GTFT). This strategy always reciprocates cooperation with cooperation, and usually replies to defection with defection.
685:
Social dilemma theory was applied to study social media communication and knowledge sharing in organizations. Organizational knowledge can be considered a public good where motivation to contribute is key. Both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation are important at individual level and can be addressed
681:
However, there may be strategic considerations as well. First, communication gives group members a chance to make promises and explicit commitments about what they will do. It is not clear if many people stick to their promises to cooperate. Similarly, through communication people are able to gather
308:
Asymmetric prisoner's dilemma games are those in which one prisoner has more to gain and/or lose than the other. In iterated experiments with unequal rewards for co-operation, a goal of maximizing benefit may be overruled by a goal of equalizing benefit. The disadvantaged player may defect a certain
773:
There are many additional structural solutions which modify the social dilemma, both from the inside and from the outside. The likelihood of successfully co-managing a shared resource, successfully organizing to self-govern, or successfully cooperating in a social dilemma depends on many variables,
644:
Individual self interest has led to over half of
Americans believing that government regulation of businesses does more harm than good. Yet, when the same Americans are asked about specific regulations such as standards for food and water quality, most are satisfied with the laws currently in place
378:
assumes that people might cooperate under two conditions: They must (1) have a cooperative goal, and (2) expect others to cooperate. Another psychological model, the appropriateness model, questions the game theory assumption that individuals rationally calculate their pay-offs. Instead many people
754:
Another structural solution is reducing group size. Cooperation generally declines when group size increases. In larger groups people often feel less responsible for the common good and believe that their contribution does not matter. Reducing the scale of a problem (such as dividing a large scale
750:
with limited power especially when people's group ties are strong. When ties are weak, groups prefer a stronger leader with a coercive power base. The question remains whether authorities can be trusted in governing social dilemmas and field research shows that legitimacy and fair procedures are
348:
delineates that cooperating with family members might pay because of shared genetic interests. It might be profitable for a parent to help their off-spring because doing so facilitates the survival of their genes. Reciprocity theories provide a different account of the evolution of cooperation. In
125:
consists of a perpetual war between people with conflicting interests, causing people to quarrel and seek personal power even in situations where cooperation would be mutually beneficial for both parties. Through his interpretation of humans in the state of nature as selfish and quick to engage in
866:
Research in this area is applied to areas such as organizational welfare, public health, local and global environmental change. The emphasis is shifting from pure laboratory research towards research testing combinations of motivational, strategic, and structural solutions. It is encouraging that
719:
Structural solutions change the rules of the game either through modifying the social dilemma or removing the dilemma altogether. Field research on conservation behaviour has shown that selective incentives in the form of monetary rewards are effective in decreasing domestic water and electricity
142:
Two neighbours may agree to drain a meadow, which they possess in common; because it is easy for them to know each others mind; and each must perceive, that the immediate consequence of his failing in his part, is, the abandoning the whole project. But it is very difficult, and indeed impossible,
670:
Research on the development of social value orientations suggest an influence of factors like family history (prosocials have more sibling sisters), age (older people are more prosocial), culture (more individualists in
Western cultures), gender (more women are prosocial), even university course
529:
An example of a social trap is the use of vehicles and the resulting pollution. Viewed individually, vehicles are an adaptive technology that have revolutionized transportation and greatly improved quality of life. But their current widespread use produces high levels of pollution, directly from
405:
dilemma is a situation in which the whole group can benefit if some of the members give something for the common good but individuals benefit from “free riding” if enough others contribute. Public goods are defined by two characteristics: non-excludability and non-rivalry—meaning that anyone can
177:
that is both nonrival and nonexcludable, one contributor tends to reduce their contribution to the public good as others contribute more. Additionally, Olson emphasized the tendency of individuals to pursue economic interests that would be beneficial to themselves and not necessarily the overall
373:
suggests that people transform a given pay-off matrix into an effective matrix that is more consistent with their social dilemma preferences. A prisoner's dilemma with close kin, for example, changes the pay-off matrix into one in which it is rational to be cooperative. Attribution models offer
237:
The prisoner's dilemma model is crucial to understanding the collective problem because it illustrates the consequences of individual interests that conflict with the interests of the group. In simple models such as this one, the problem would have been solved had the two prisoners been able to
217:
Social dilemmas have attracted a great deal of interest in the social and behavioral sciences. Economists, biologists, psychologists, sociologists, and political scientists alike study behavior in social dilemmas. The most influential theoretical approach is economic game theory (i.e., rational
729:
because one can enjoy the benefits of a sanctioning system without contribution to its existence. The police, army, and judicial system will fail to operate unless people are willing to pay taxes to support them. This raises the question if many people want to contribute to these institutions.
653:
Studying the conditions under which people cooperate can shed light on how to resolve social dilemmas. The literature distinguishes between three broad classes of solutions—motivational, strategic, and structural—which vary in whether they see actors as motivated purely by self-interest and in
428:
and public parks that are usually provided by governments using taxpayer funds. In return for their tax contribution, taxpayers enjoy the benefits of these public goods. In developing countries where funding for public projects is scarce, however, it often falls on communities to compete for
724:
is more likely based on a number of factors, including whether or not individuals have the ability to monitor the situation, to punish or "sanction" defectors, if they are legitimized by external political structures to cooperate and self-organize, can communicate with one another and share
666:
which shows that people have stable preferences for how much they value outcomes for self versus others. Research has concentrated on three social motives: (1) individualism—maximizing own outcomes regardless of others; (2) competition—maximizing own outcomes relative to others; and (3)
143:
that a thousand persons should agree in any such action; it being difficult for them to concert so complicated a design, and still more difficult for them to execute it; while each seeks a pretext to free himself of the trouble and expence, and would lay the whole burden on others.
863:. Their widespread importance warrants widespread understanding of the main types of dilemmas and accompanying paradigms. Fortunately, the literature on the subject is expanding to accommodate the pressing need to understand social dilemmas as the basis for real-world problems.
383:, like an equality rule, to decide whether or not to cooperate. The logic of appropriateness suggests that people ask themselves the question: "what does a person like me (identity) do (rules/heuristics) in a situation like this (recognition) given this culture (group)?" (Weber
699:
other showed TFT to be the most successful strategy in social dilemmas. TFT is a common strategy in real-world social dilemmas because it is nice but firm. Consider, for instance, that marriage contracts, rental agreements, and international trade policies all use TFT-tactics.
678:. A robust finding in the social dilemma literature is that cooperation increases when people are given a chance to talk to each other. It has been quite a challenge to explain this effect. One motivational reason is that communication reinforces a sense of group identity.
774:
from the nature of the resource system, to the nature of the social system the actors are a part of, to the political position of external authorities, to the ability to communicate effectively, to the rules-in-place regarding the management of the commons. However,
437:
A replenishing resource management dilemma is a situation in which group members share a renewable resource that will continue to produce benefits if group members do not over harvest it but in which any single individual profits from harvesting as much as possible.
357:, but fails to account for larger groups. Evolutionary theories of indirect reciprocity and costly signaling may be useful to explain large-scale cooperation. When people can selectively choose partners to play games with, it pays to develop a cooperative
738:
sanctions, where initial punishments have low severity, make allowances for unusual hardships, and allow the violator to reenter the trust of the collective, have been found to support collective resource management and increase trust in the system.
1274:
Van Vugt, M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2006). Psychological adaptations for prosocial behavior: The altruism puzzle. In M. Schaller, J. A. Simpson, & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolution and Social
Psychology (pp. 237–261). New York: Psychology
65:
Problems arise when too many group members choose to pursue individual profit and immediate satisfaction rather than behave in the group's best long-term interests. Social dilemmas can take many forms and are studied across disciplines such as
538:
A perceptual dilemma arises during conflict and is a product of outgroup bias. In this dilemma, the parties to the conflict prefer cooperation while simultaneously believing that the other side would take advantage of conciliatory gestures.
521:
occurs when individuals or groups pursue immediate rewards that later prove to have negative or even lethal consequences. This type of dilemma arises when a behavior produces rewards initially but continuing the same behavior produces
189:
Olson's book established the collective action problem as one of the most troubling dilemmas in social science, leaving a profound impression on present-day discussions of human behaviour and its relationship with governmental policy.
769:
In society, social units which face a social dilemma within are typically embedded in interaction with other groups, often competition for resources of different kinds. Once this is modeled the social dilemma is strongly attenuated.
152:, as they assume that each of the other members of the team will put in enough effort to achieve said goal. In smaller groups, the impact one individual has is much greater, so individuals will be less inclined to free ride.
224:
is one of the principal components of economic theory. It addresses the way individuals allocate scarce resources and how scarcity drives human interaction. One of the most famous examples of game theory is the
374:
further support for these transformations. Whether individuals approach a social dilemma selfishly or cooperatively might depend upon whether they believe people are naturally greedy or cooperative. Similarly,
682:
information about what others do. On the other hand, this information might produce ambiguous results; an awareness of other people's willingness to cooperate may cause a temptation to take advantage of them.
238:
communicate. In more complex real world situations involving numerous individuals, however, the collective action problem often prevents groups from making decisions that are of collective economic interest.
147:
In this passage, Hume establishes the basis for the collective action problem. In a situation in which a thousand people are expected to work together to achieve a common goal, individuals will be likely to
867:
researchers from various behavioral sciences are developing unifying theoretical frameworks to study social dilemmas (like evolutionary theory; or the Social-Ecological
Systems framework developed by
570:, each side knew that the use of nuclear weapons would result in their own destruction. While controversial, MAD succeeded in its primary purpose of preventing nuclear war and kept the Cold War cold.
641:, as these people and businesses are incentivized to choose the easier and cheaper option, which often differs from the environmentally-friendly option that would benefit the health of the planet.
349:
repeated social dilemma games between the same individuals, cooperation might emerge because participants can punish a partner for failing to cooperate. This encourages reciprocal cooperation.
612:
in the United States, however, this collective action problem does not decrease voter turnout as much as some political scientists might expect. It turns out that most
Americans believe their
1999:
1863:
671:(economics students are less prosocial). However, until we know more about the psychological mechanisms underlying these social value orientations we lack a good basis for interventions.
786:
know who all is involved, do not have a foundation of trust and reciprocity, cannot communicate, have no established rules, and lack effective monitoring and sanctioning mechanisms."
369:
Psychological models offer additional insights into social dilemmas by questioning the traditional game theory assumption that individuals are confined to their narrow self-interest.
1347:
45:
is a situation in which all individuals would be better off cooperating but fail to do so because of conflicting interests between individuals that discourage joint action. The
471:. A common good is rivalrous and non-excludable, meaning that anyone can use the resource but there is a finite amount of the resource available and it is therefore prone to
734:
system might undermine voluntary cooperation. Some research has found that punishment systems decrease the trust that people have in others. Other research has found that
703:
However, with some probability GTFT will forgive a defection by the other player and cooperate. In a world of errors in action and perception, such a strategy can be a
3517:
2518:
2438:
2215:
305:
In iterated games, players may learn to trust one another, or develop strategies like tit-for-tat, cooperating unless the opponent has defected in the previous round.
3567:
3040:
1973:
742:
Boundary structural solutions modify the social dilemma structure and such strategies are often very effective. Experimental studies on commons dilemmas show that
3127:
2877:
1075:
Allison, S. T.; Beggan, J. K.; Midgley, E. H. (1996). "The quest for "similar instances" and "simultaneous possibilities": Metaphors in social dilemma research".
350:
309:
proportion of the time without it being in the interest of the advantaged player to defect. In more natural circumstances, there may be better solutions to the
3687:
2256:
Mulder, L.B.; Van Dijk, E.; De Cremer, D.; Wilke, H.A.M. (2006). "Undermining trust and cooperation: The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas".
2734:
2129:
3418:
3119:
2032:
3401:
1871:
968:
1382:
Weber, M.; Kopelman, S.; Messick, D. (2004). "A conceptual Review of
Decision Making in Social Dilemmas: Applying the Logic of Appropriateness".
526:. Stimuli that cause social traps are called sliding reinforcers, since they reinforce the behavior in small doses and punish it in large doses.
2784:
Palfrey, Thomas R. & Rosenthal, Howard (1988). "Private
Incentives in Social Dilemmas: The Effects of Incomplete Information and Altruism".
1265:
Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1965). Prisoner’s
Dilemma: A study of conflict and cooperation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
186:" of the market, where individuals pursuing their own interests should theoretically result in the collective well-being of the overall market.
3718:
3123:
3093:
746:
groups are more willing to appoint a leader to look after the common resource. There is a preference for a democratically elected prototypical
3241:
121:
in 1651 that "if any two men desire the same thing, which nevertheless they cannot both enjoy, they become enemies." Hobbes believed that the
3381:
3186:
2996:
2814:
2669:
2546:
547:
The prevalence of perceptual dilemmas in conflict has led to the development of two distinct schools of thought on the subject. According to
246:
against the other without being testified against. However, the optimal group outcome is for the two prisoners to cooperate with each other.
3728:
707:
and evolutionarily stable. The more beneficial cooperation is, the more forgiving GTFT can be while still resisting invasion by defectors.
2557:
601:
Scholars estimate that, even in a battleground state, there is only a one in ten million chance that one vote could sway the outcome of a
98:. Additionally, the collective problem can be applied to numerous public policy concerns that countries across the world currently face.
3033:
2600:
2411:
see for example Gunnthorsdottir, A. and Rapoport, A. (2006). "Embedding social dilemmas in intergroup competition reduces free-riding".
602:
1425:
Kopelman, S (2009). "The effect of culture and power on cooperation in commons dilemmas: Implications for global resource management".
344:
theory, individuals may pursue a seemingly irrational strategy to cooperate if it benefits the survival of their genes. The concept of
3414:
3365:
2833:
2077:
1020:
809:
3131:
2950:
Weber, M.; Kopelman, S. & Messick, D. M. (2004). "A conceptual review of social dilemmas: Applying a logic of appropriateness".
1040:
842:
782:
results in a social dilemma (and perhaps the need for privatization or an external authority) tend to occur "when resource users do
115:
was an early philosopher on the topic of human cooperation. Hobbes believed that people act purely out of self-interest, writing in
340:
Biological and evolutionary approaches provide useful complementary insights into decision-making in social dilemmas. According to
1589:
Kenneth T. Frank; Brian Petrie; Jae S. Choi; William C. Leggett (2005). "Trophic Cascades in a Formerly Cod-Dominated Ecosystem".
3146:
1516:
The reduction in motivation and effort when individuals work collectively compared with when they work individually or coactively
3681:
3377:
3373:
3355:
3284:
3101:
341:
325:
1188:
694:
A second category of solutions are primarily strategic. In repeated interactions cooperation might emerge when people adopt a
3753:
3743:
3670:
3627:
3622:
3115:
3026:
166:
58:
585:
132:
provided another early and better-known interpretation of what is now called the collective action problem in his 1738 book
3723:
3617:
3231:
1243:"The Collective Action Problem | GEOG 30N: Geographic Perspectives on Sustainability and Human-Environment Systems, 2011"
3562:
2724:
Messick, D. M. & Brewer, M. B. (1983). "Solving social dilemmas: A review". In Wheeler, L. & Shaver, P. (eds.).
2049:
Orbell, John M.; Dawes, Robyn M. & van de Kragt, Alphons J. C. (1988). "Explaining discussion-induced cooperation".
563:
2987:
Yamagishi, T. (1986). "The structural goal/expectation theory of cooperation in social dilemmas". In Lawler, E. (ed.).
2078:"What factors influence knowledge sharing in organizations? A social dilemma perspective of social media communication"
584:
during a prolonged period of hostilities between the two countries was well-received and ultimately contributed in the
3758:
3708:
3592:
3485:
3448:
3422:
3325:
1286:
1498:
Karau, Steven J.; Williams, Kipling D. (1993). "Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration".
3748:
3532:
3476:
3410:
3310:
3289:
978:
134:
2924:"Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods"
2315:"Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods"
662:
Motivational solutions assume that people have other-regarding preferences. There is a considerable literature on
3557:
3406:
3270:
2773:
2688:"The effect of culture and power on cooperation in commons dilemmas: Implications for global resource management"
2687:
2168:
663:
485:
The template of the tragedy of the commons can be used to understand myriad problems, including various forms of
2350:
Ostrom, Elinor (24 July 2009). "A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems".
813:
573:
Conciliatory gestures have also been used to great effect, in keeping with conflict spiral theory. For example,
126:
conflict, Hobbes's philosophy laid the foundation for what is now referred to as the collective action problem.
3738:
3733:
3587:
3495:
3458:
3427:
3340:
3294:
3097:
3053:
1682:""The Tragedy of the Commons": How Individualism and Collectivism Affected the Spread of the COVID-19 Pandemic"
1488:
Baumol, William (1952). Welfare Economics and the Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
567:
138:. Hume characterizes a collective action problem through his depiction of neighbors agreeing to drain a meadow:
2682:. In E. Ostrom et al., (Eds.) The Drama of the Commons. Washington DC: National Academy Press. Ch. 4., 113–156
361:. Cooperation communicates kindness and generosity, which combine to make someone an attractive group member.
375:
3642:
3632:
3582:
3226:
3221:
468:
174:
116:
95:
1892:
Kanazawa, Satoshi (2000). "A New Solution to the Collective Action Problem: The Paradox of Voter Turnout".
452:
3636:
3607:
3369:
3176:
2878:"Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence"
2014:
983:
731:
638:
467:
is a type of replenishing resource management dilemma. The dilemma arises when members of a group share a
464:
447:
396:
370:
1930:
Duit, Andreas (2011-12-01). "Patterns of Environmental Collective Action: Some Cross-National Findings".
3597:
3396:
3315:
3206:
3171:
2847:(1999). "Three social dilemmas of workforce diversity in organizations: A social identity perspective".
2432:
1355:
1312:
489:. For example, overfishing in the 1960s and 1970s led to depletion of the previously abundant supply of
479:
2000:"Car versus public transportation? The role of social value orientations in a real-life social dilemma"
948:
674:
Another factor that might affect the weight individuals assign to group outcomes is the possibility of
242:
226:
2105:
1061:
Erhard Friedberg, "Conflict of Interest from the Perspective of the Sociology of Organized Action" in
855:
Close examination reveals that social dilemmas underlie many of the most pressing global issues, from
3602:
3537:
3111:
2749:
2359:
2144:
1598:
50:
2680:
Factors Influencing Cooperation in Commons Dilemmas: A Review of Experimental Psychological Research
2019:
1462:
Allison, S. T.; Kerr, N.L. (1994). "Group correspondence biases and the provision of public goods".
459:
stocks were severely overexploited in the 1970s and 1980s, leading to their abrupt collapse in 1992.
3572:
3522:
3481:
3216:
3089:
860:
523:
478:
The paradigm of the tragedy of the commons first appeared in an 1833 pamphlet by English economist
410:
3656:
3660:
3432:
3360:
3265:
3211:
2975:
2864:
2844:
2765:
2648:
2512:
2393:
2209:
2160:
2110:
1955:
1909:
1622:
1407:
973:
613:
574:
486:
418:
310:
149:
91:
79:
31:
2569:
3713:
3612:
3350:
3280:
3250:
3196:
3075:
3049:
2992:
2967:
2910:
2829:
2810:
2665:
2542:
2485:
2385:
1947:
1778:
1760:
1721:
1703:
1614:
1399:
1175:
Rapoport, A. (1962). The use and misuse of game theory. Scientific American, 207(6), 108–119.
1158:
1036:
928:
908:
903:
881:
630:
548:
345:
213:
This chart illustrates the prisoner's dilemma, one of the most famous examples of game theory.
75:
46:
2923:
2314:
1217:
3161:
2959:
2938:
2900:
2892:
2856:
2793:
2757:
2710:
2702:
2638:
2630:
2609:
2586:
2475:
2465:
2420:
2375:
2367:
2329:
2265:
2238:
2152:
2100:
2092:
2058:
2024:
1939:
1901:
1845:
1805:
1768:
1752:
1711:
1693:
1649:
1606:
1507:
1471:
1442:
1434:
1391:
1148:
1084:
1028:
938:
820:
763:
704:
609:
472:
425:
354:
1822:
Wallace, M.D. (1979). Arms races and escalations: some new evidence. In J.D. Singer (Ed.),
1032:
3330:
3260:
3166:
3136:
3085:
3080:
3064:
3018:
1368:
1325:
963:
913:
898:
634:
160:
The most prominent modern interpretation of the collective action problem can be found in
122:
1292:. Meetings of the Canadian Economics Association, Toronto, June 4–6, 2004. Archived from
758:
Another proposed boundary solution is to remove the social from the dilemma, by means of
2753:
2590:
2363:
2148:
1740:
1602:
1532:"Public Goods: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics | Library of Economics and Liberty"
1340:
3201:
3056:
2480:
2453:
2028:
1849:
1773:
1716:
1681:
993:
988:
872:
856:
743:
626:
577:
329:
317:
183:
1572:
Schroeder, D. A. (1995). An introduction to social dilemmas. In D.A. Schroeder (Ed.),
1531:
3702:
3547:
2868:
2797:
1959:
1943:
1653:
998:
933:
918:
868:
759:
675:
414:
112:
83:
2397:
2114:
1680:
Maaravi, Yossi; Levy, Aharon; Gur, Tamar; Confino, Dan; Segal, Sandra (2021-02-11).
1626:
501:
209:
3527:
3141:
2979:
2769:
2164:
1411:
1339:
Beckenkamp, Martin; Hennig-Schmidt, Heike; Maier-Rigaud, Frank P. (March 4, 2007).
1196:
943:
824:
726:
559:
490:
456:
402:
161:
54:
2505:
Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice
2202:
Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice
1242:
2876:
Van Lange, P. A. M.; Otten, W.; De Bruin, E. M. N. & Joireman, J. A. (1997).
2679:
2634:
1974:"A Majority Says that Government Regulation of Business Does More Harm than Good"
1741:"Culture and COVID-19-related mortality: a cross-sectional study of 50 countries"
3151:
3106:
2963:
2706:
2424:
2229:
Yamagishi, T. (1986). "The Provision of a Sanctioning System as a Public Good".
1438:
1395:
958:
953:
923:
721:
695:
518:
221:
204:
87:
2942:
2896:
2860:
2333:
2269:
2242:
2062:
1756:
1511:
1475:
1088:
3491:
3275:
1698:
1153:
1136:
885:
380:
358:
179:
129:
67:
17:
2643:
2096:
1951:
1764:
1707:
1162:
3577:
3501:
3391:
3386:
3305:
3300:
3181:
2613:
2470:
2371:
1610:
1293:
877:
321:
78:. Examples of phenomena that can be explained using social dilemmas include
71:
2971:
2489:
2389:
1782:
1725:
1618:
1403:
1065:, Anne Peters & Lukas Handschin (eds), Cambridge University Press, 2012
2914:
1836:
Tetlock, P. E. (1983). "Policy-makers' images of international conflict".
86:. The collective action problem can be understood through the analysis of
3552:
3542:
2715:
2187:
Governing the Commons:The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
1447:
555:
2380:
1913:
1864:"Voting matters even if your vote doesn't: A collective action dilemma"
1176:
387:, 2004) (Kopelman 2009) and that these factors influence cooperation.
2905:
2652:
1559:
3320:
3191:
2761:
2156:
1809:
1019:
Brown, Garrett; McLean, Iain; McMillan, Alistair, eds. (2018-01-18).
747:
581:
510:
506:
1905:
1640:
Brechner, K. C. (1977). "An experimental analysis of social traps".
2598:——— & Messick, M. (2000). "Social Dilemmas".
720:
use. Furthermore, numerous experimental and case studies show that
3468:
1824:
Explaining war: Selected papers from the correlates of war project
1341:"Cooperation in Symmetric and Asymmetric Prisoner's Dilemma Games"
500:
451:
379:
base their decisions on what people around them do and use simple
208:
2419:(2): 184–199, also contains a survey of the relevant literature.
3156:
3022:
3013:
2621:
Kollock, P. (1998). "Social dilemmas: Anatomy of cooperation".
1063:
Conflict of Interest in Global, Public and Corporate Governance
3453:
793:
111:
Although he never used the words "collective action problem",
353:
serves as an explanation for why participants cooperate in
53:
for centuries, but was most clearly established in 1965 in
2076:
Razmerita, Liana; Kirchner, Kathrin; Nielsen, Pia (2016).
654:
whether they change the rules of the social dilemma game.
2991:. Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. pp. 51–87.
871:
and her colleagues). For instance, there is a burgeoning
617:
collective action will also lead to individual benefits.
2728:. Vol. 4. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. pp. 11–44.
1998:
Van Vugt, M.; Meertens, R. & Van Lange, P. (1995).
1574:
Social dilemmas: Perspectives on individuals and groups
554:
An example of the deterrence theory in practice is the
2345:
2343:
1348:
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
558:
strategy (employed by both the United States and the
2695:
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
2413:
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
1427:
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
3510:
3467:
3441:
3339:
3249:
3063:
1218:"Game theory II: Prisoner's dilemma | Policonomics"
30:"Social dilemma" redirects here. For the film, see
2678:Kopelman, S., Weber, M, & Messick, D. (2002).
1287:"Alibi games: the Asymmetric Prisoner' s Dilemmas"
2454:"A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas"
649:Factors promoting cooperation in social dilemmas
173:Olson further argued that in the case of a pure
3568:Environmental, social, and corporate governance
2458:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
3034:
1285:Robinson, D.R.; Goforth, D.J. (May 5, 2004).
8:
2931:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
2885:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
2517:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
2437:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
2322:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
2231:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
2214:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
2051:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
1500:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
1464:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
1077:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
1025:Collective action problem - Oxford Reference
530:their energy source or over their lifespan.
2726:Review of personality and social psychology
424:Pure public goods include services such as
3041:
3027:
3019:
2735:"Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations"
2507:. Princeton University Press. p. 228.
2130:"Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations"
2106:10398/e7995d52-ccc3-4156-b131-41e5908d0e63
823:. Please do not remove this message until
2922:Van Vugt, M. & De Cremer, D. (1999).
2904:
2828:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2714:
2642:
2479:
2469:
2379:
2313:Van Vugt, M. & De Cremer, D. (1999).
2258:Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
2104:
2018:
1772:
1715:
1697:
1642:Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
1446:
1152:
843:Learn how and when to remove this message
2952:Personality and Social Psychology Review
2577:Dawes, R. M. (1980). "Social dilemmas".
1668:Two Lectures on the Checks to Population
1584:
1582:
1384:Personality and Social Psychology Review
1027:. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press.
819:Relevant discussion may be found on the
248:
3402:Pollutant release and transfer register
1011:
969:Superimposed Schedules of Reinforcement
3014:Homepage of the social-dilemma network
2510:
2430:
2207:
1925:
1923:
1826:(pp. 24-252). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
1739:Käffer, Arnold; Mahlich, Jörg (2022).
1553:
1551:
1526:
1524:
1522:
1364:
1353:
1321:
1310:
1137:"Collective action: fifty years later"
94:, which results from the provision of
3187:Principles for Responsible Investment
2826:Social Traps and the Problem of Trust
2660:Komorita, S. & Parks, C. (1994).
2503:Poteete, Janssen, and Ostrom (2010).
2200:Poteete, Janssen, and Ostrom (2010).
1130:
1128:
7:
3676:
2452:Ostrom, Elinor (25 September 2007).
2007:Journal of Applied Social Psychology
1558:Banerjee, Abhijit (September 2006).
1177:http://www.jstor.org/stable/24936389
1033:10.1093/acref/9780199670840.001.0001
2601:International Journal of Psychology
2591:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001125
2556:Batson, D. & Ahmad, N. (2008).
603:United States presidential election
3366:Environmental full-cost accounting
2733:Nowak, M. A.; Sigmund, K. (1992).
2128:Nowak, M. A.; Sigmund, K. (1992).
2029:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01594.x
1850:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1983.tb00130.x
686:through managerial interventions.
566:(MAD). Because both countries had
25:
1796:Platt, J (1973). "Social traps".
3675:
3666:
3665:
3655:
3240:
3147:Extended producer responsibility
1944:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00858.x
1560:"Public Action for Public Goods"
798:
433:Replenishing resource management
409:Public goods are goods that are
3356:Eco-Management and Audit Scheme
2664:. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
2085:Journal of Knowledge Management
1868:Princeton University Press Blog
1745:Journal of Public Health Policy
625:Environmental problems such as
3628:Socially responsible marketing
3623:Socially responsible investing
167:The Logic of Collective Action
59:The Logic of Collective Action
49:problem has been addressed in
1:
3719:Political science terminology
3618:Socially responsible business
2298:Poteete; et al. (2010).
2204:. Princeton University Press.
2189:. Cambridge University Press.
270:Prisoner A does not confess (
254:Prisoner B does not confess (
3563:Environmental pricing reform
3094:environmental responsibility
2809:. London: Penguin Classics.
2798:10.1016/0047-2727(88)90035-7
2635:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.183
2558:"Altruism: Myth or Reality?"
2539:The evolution of cooperation
1894:American Sociological Review
1870:. 2012-11-05. Archived from
1654:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90054-3
1135:Sandler, Todd (2015-09-01).
564:mutually assured destruction
326:Unscrupulous diner's dilemma
178:public. This contrasts with
3729:Social sciences terminology
3593:Market governance mechanism
3449:Global Reporting Initiative
3419:standards and certification
3326:Social return on investment
2989:Advances in group processes
2964:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_4
2786:Journal of Public Economics
2707:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.06.004
2579:Annual Review of Psychology
2425:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.005
1439:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.06.004
1396:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_4
1021:"Collective action problem"
825:conditions to do so are met
3775:
3533:Community interest company
3477:Community-based monitoring
3311:Genuine progress indicator
2943:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.587
2897:10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.733
2861:10.1177/001872679905201105
2623:Annual Review of Sociology
2334:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.587
2270:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.002
2243:10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.110
2063:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.811
1757:10.1057/s41271-022-00363-9
1686:Frontiers in Public Health
1512:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681
1476:10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.688
1119:A Treatise of Human Nature
1089:10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.479
979:Tragedy of the anticommons
445:
394:
316:Related games include the
202:
135:A Treatise of Human Nature
29:
3651:
3558:Environmental degradation
3407:Sustainability accounting
3271:Ethical positioning index
3238:
2541:. New York: Basic Books.
1699:10.3389/fpubh.2021.627559
1154:10.1007/s11127-015-0252-0
664:social value orientations
586:Egypt–Israel peace treaty
39:collective action problem
3588:Health impact assessment
3459:Sustainability reporting
3428:Toxics Release Inventory
3222:Transparency (behavioral
3197:Social impact assessment
3086:Corporate accountability
2097:10.1108/JKM-03-2016-0112
1838:Journal of Social Issues
637:or cut back on usage of
568:second strike capability
505:Pollution in the sky of
3643:Supply chain management
3583:Global justice movement
3382:profit-and-loss account
2843:Schneider, S. K. &
2614:10.1080/002075900399402
2537:Axelrod, R. A. (1984).
2471:10.1073/pnas.0702288104
2372:10.1126/science.1172133
2283:Ostrom, Elinor (1990).
2185:Ostrom, Elinor (1990).
1611:10.1126/science.1113075
1247:www.e-education.psu.edu
639:non-renewable resources
608:Despite high levels of
376:goal-expectation theory
232:
3608:SDG Publishers Compact
3370:Environmental conflict
3177:Organizational justice
2824:Rothstein, B. (2003).
1363:Cite journal requires
1320:Cite journal requires
1193:levine.sscnet.ucla.edu
1189:"What is Game Theory?"
984:Tragedy of the commons
658:Motivational solutions
514:
465:tragedy of the commons
460:
448:Tragedy of the commons
442:Tragedy of the commons
371:Interdependence Theory
365:Psychological theories
287:Prisoner A confesses (
282:Prisoner B: goes free
261:Prisoner B confesses (
214:
145:
27:Type of social dilemma
3754:Social responsibility
3744:Administrative theory
3598:Product certification
3397:Life-cycle assessment
3316:Performance indicator
3207:Social responsibility
3172:Organizational ethics
3102:social responsibility
2686:Kopelman, S. (2009).
2285:Governing the Commons
1798:American Psychologist
504:
480:William Forster Lloyd
455:
336:Evolutionary theories
294:Prisoner A: goes free
212:
140:
3724:Public choice theory
3603:Public participation
3538:Conflict of interest
3128:inequality in the UK
3120:in the United States
3112:Environmental racism
715:Structural solutions
621:Environmental policy
299:Each serves 2 years
51:political philosophy
3573:Ethical consumerism
3523:Benefit corporation
3415:metrics and indices
3217:Sullivan principles
3132:injustice in Europe
2805:Ridley, M. (1997).
2754:1992Natur.355..250N
2464:(39): 15181–15187.
2364:2009Sci...325..419O
2149:1992Natur.355..250N
1978:Pew Research Center
1603:2005Sci...308.1621F
1597:(5728): 1621–1623.
1299:on December 6, 2004
861:conflict escalation
812:of this section is
690:Strategic solutions
524:diminishing returns
397:Volunteer's dilemma
296:Prisoner B: 3 years
280:Prisoner A: 3 years
102:Prominent theorists
3759:Concepts in ethics
3709:Community building
3661:Environment portal
3433:Triple bottom line
3361:Emission inventory
3266:Double bottom line
3212:Stakeholder theory
974:The Social Dilemma
949:Prisoner's dilemma
614:political efficacy
575:Egyptian President
534:Perceptual dilemma
515:
487:resource depletion
461:
419:free-rider problem
311:bargaining problem
277:Each serves 1 year
243:prisoner's dilemma
233:Prisoner's dilemma
227:prisoner's dilemma
215:
92:free-rider problem
80:resource depletion
32:The Social Dilemma
3749:Social psychology
3696:
3695:
3613:Social enterprise
3518:Bangladesh Accord
3378:management system
3374:impact assessment
3351:Carbon accounting
3281:Impact assessment
3232:UN Global Compact
3124:in Western Europe
3076:Aarhus Convention
2998:978-0-89232-572-6
2855:(11): 1445–1468.
2845:Northcraft, G. B.
2816:978-0-670-87449-1
2807:Origins of virtue
2748:(6357): 250–253.
2671:978-0-8133-3003-7
2644:20.500.12749/3338
2548:978-0-465-02122-2
2358:(5939): 419–422.
2143:(6357): 250–253.
1932:Political Studies
1224:. 4 February 2013
929:Identity politics
909:Coordination game
904:Collective action
882:political science
853:
852:
845:
631:biodiversity loss
580:'s 1977 visit to
549:deterrence theory
346:inclusive fitness
303:
302:
76:political science
47:collective action
16:(Redirected from
3766:
3679:
3678:
3669:
3668:
3659:
3244:
3162:Little Eichmanns
3043:
3036:
3029:
3020:
3002:
2983:
2946:
2928:
2918:
2908:
2882:
2872:
2839:
2820:
2801:
2780:
2778:
2772:. Archived from
2762:10.1038/355250a0
2739:
2729:
2720:
2718:
2692:
2675:
2656:
2646:
2617:
2594:
2573:
2568:. Archived from
2562:In-Mind Magazine
2552:
2523:
2522:
2516:
2508:
2500:
2494:
2493:
2483:
2473:
2449:
2443:
2442:
2436:
2428:
2408:
2402:
2401:
2383:
2347:
2338:
2337:
2319:
2310:
2304:
2303:
2300:Working Together
2295:
2289:
2288:
2280:
2274:
2273:
2253:
2247:
2246:
2226:
2220:
2219:
2213:
2205:
2197:
2191:
2190:
2182:
2176:
2175:
2173:
2167:. Archived from
2157:10.1038/355250a0
2134:
2125:
2119:
2118:
2108:
2091:(6): 1225–1246.
2082:
2073:
2067:
2066:
2046:
2040:
2039:
2037:
2031:. Archived from
2022:
2004:
1995:
1989:
1988:
1986:
1985:
1970:
1964:
1963:
1927:
1918:
1917:
1889:
1883:
1882:
1880:
1879:
1860:
1854:
1853:
1833:
1827:
1820:
1814:
1813:
1810:10.1037/h0035723
1793:
1787:
1786:
1776:
1736:
1730:
1729:
1719:
1701:
1677:
1671:
1664:
1658:
1657:
1637:
1631:
1630:
1586:
1577:
1570:
1564:
1563:
1555:
1546:
1545:
1543:
1542:
1528:
1517:
1515:
1495:
1489:
1486:
1480:
1479:
1459:
1453:
1452:
1450:
1422:
1416:
1415:
1379:
1373:
1372:
1366:
1361:
1359:
1351:
1345:
1336:
1330:
1329:
1323:
1318:
1316:
1308:
1306:
1304:
1298:
1291:
1282:
1276:
1272:
1266:
1263:
1257:
1256:
1254:
1253:
1239:
1233:
1232:
1230:
1229:
1222:policonomics.com
1214:
1208:
1207:
1205:
1204:
1195:. Archived from
1185:
1179:
1173:
1167:
1166:
1156:
1147:(3–4): 195–216.
1132:
1123:
1122:
1114:
1108:
1107:
1102:Hobbes, Thomas.
1099:
1093:
1092:
1072:
1066:
1059:
1053:
1052:
1050:
1049:
1016:
939:Nash equilibrium
848:
841:
837:
834:
828:
802:
801:
794:
764:locus of control
705:Nash equilibrium
635:carbon emissions
610:political apathy
473:overexploitation
426:national defense
249:
21:
3774:
3773:
3769:
3768:
3767:
3765:
3764:
3763:
3739:Group processes
3734:Social concepts
3699:
3698:
3697:
3692:
3647:
3506:
3463:
3437:
3342:
3335:
3331:Whole-life cost
3261:Corporate crime
3252:
3245:
3236:
3167:Loss and damage
3137:Ethical banking
3081:Climate justice
3068:
3059:
3047:
3010:
3005:
2999:
2986:
2949:
2926:
2921:
2880:
2875:
2849:Human Relations
2842:
2836:
2823:
2817:
2804:
2783:
2776:
2737:
2732:
2723:
2690:
2685:
2672:
2662:Social Dilemmas
2659:
2620:
2597:
2576:
2555:
2549:
2536:
2532:
2530:Further reading
2527:
2526:
2509:
2502:
2501:
2497:
2451:
2450:
2446:
2429:
2410:
2409:
2405:
2349:
2348:
2341:
2317:
2312:
2311:
2307:
2297:
2296:
2292:
2282:
2281:
2277:
2255:
2254:
2250:
2228:
2227:
2223:
2206:
2199:
2198:
2194:
2184:
2183:
2179:
2171:
2132:
2127:
2126:
2122:
2080:
2075:
2074:
2070:
2048:
2047:
2043:
2035:
2020:10.1.1.612.8158
2002:
1997:
1996:
1992:
1983:
1981:
1972:
1971:
1967:
1929:
1928:
1921:
1906:10.2307/2657465
1891:
1890:
1886:
1877:
1875:
1862:
1861:
1857:
1835:
1834:
1830:
1821:
1817:
1795:
1794:
1790:
1738:
1737:
1733:
1679:
1678:
1674:
1665:
1661:
1639:
1638:
1634:
1588:
1587:
1580:
1571:
1567:
1557:
1556:
1549:
1540:
1538:
1536:www.econlib.org
1530:
1529:
1520:
1497:
1496:
1492:
1487:
1483:
1461:
1460:
1456:
1424:
1423:
1419:
1381:
1380:
1376:
1362:
1352:
1344:(preprint link)
1343:
1338:
1337:
1333:
1319:
1309:
1302:
1300:
1296:
1289:
1284:
1283:
1279:
1273:
1269:
1264:
1260:
1251:
1249:
1241:
1240:
1236:
1227:
1225:
1216:
1215:
1211:
1202:
1200:
1187:
1186:
1182:
1174:
1170:
1134:
1133:
1126:
1116:
1115:
1111:
1101:
1100:
1096:
1074:
1073:
1069:
1060:
1056:
1047:
1045:
1043:
1018:
1017:
1013:
1008:
1003:
964:Strategic games
914:Decision theory
899:Belling the Cat
894:
849:
838:
832:
829:
818:
803:
799:
792:
717:
692:
660:
651:
623:
599:
594:
545:
536:
499:
450:
444:
435:
399:
393:
367:
338:
295:
281:
235:
207:
201:
196:
182:theory of the "
158:
123:state of nature
109:
104:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
3772:
3770:
3762:
3761:
3756:
3751:
3746:
3741:
3736:
3731:
3726:
3721:
3716:
3711:
3701:
3700:
3694:
3693:
3691:
3690:
3685:
3673:
3663:
3652:
3649:
3648:
3646:
3645:
3640:
3630:
3625:
3620:
3615:
3610:
3605:
3600:
3595:
3590:
3585:
3580:
3575:
3570:
3565:
3560:
3555:
3550:
3545:
3540:
3535:
3530:
3525:
3520:
3514:
3512:
3508:
3507:
3505:
3504:
3499:
3489:
3479:
3473:
3471:
3465:
3464:
3462:
3461:
3456:
3454:GxP guidelines
3451:
3445:
3443:
3439:
3438:
3436:
3435:
3430:
3425:
3404:
3399:
3394:
3389:
3384:
3363:
3358:
3353:
3347:
3345:
3337:
3336:
3334:
3333:
3328:
3323:
3318:
3313:
3308:
3303:
3298:
3292:
3287:
3278:
3273:
3268:
3263:
3257:
3255:
3247:
3246:
3239:
3237:
3235:
3234:
3229:
3224:
3219:
3214:
3209:
3204:
3202:Social justice
3199:
3194:
3189:
3184:
3179:
3174:
3169:
3164:
3159:
3154:
3149:
3144:
3139:
3134:
3109:
3104:
3098:responsibility
3083:
3078:
3072:
3070:
3061:
3060:
3057:accountability
3048:
3046:
3045:
3038:
3031:
3023:
3017:
3016:
3009:
3008:External links
3006:
3004:
3003:
2997:
2984:
2958:(3): 281–307.
2947:
2937:(4): 587–599.
2919:
2891:(4): 733–746.
2873:
2840:
2835:978-0521612821
2834:
2821:
2815:
2802:
2792:(3): 309–332.
2781:
2779:on 2011-06-16.
2730:
2721:
2683:
2676:
2670:
2657:
2618:
2608:(2): 111–116.
2595:
2574:
2572:on 2008-05-17.
2553:
2547:
2533:
2531:
2528:
2525:
2524:
2495:
2444:
2403:
2339:
2328:(4): 587–599.
2305:
2290:
2275:
2264:(2): 147–162.
2248:
2237:(1): 110–116.
2221:
2192:
2177:
2174:on 2011-06-16.
2120:
2068:
2057:(5): 811–819.
2041:
2038:on 2011-07-15.
2013:(3): 358–378.
1990:
1965:
1938:(4): 900–920.
1919:
1900:(3): 433–442.
1884:
1855:
1828:
1815:
1804:(8): 641–651.
1788:
1751:(3): 413–430.
1731:
1672:
1659:
1648:(6): 552–564.
1632:
1578:
1565:
1547:
1518:
1506:(4): 681–706.
1490:
1481:
1470:(4): 688–698.
1454:
1417:
1390:(3): 281–307.
1374:
1365:|journal=
1331:
1322:|journal=
1277:
1267:
1258:
1234:
1209:
1180:
1168:
1124:
1109:
1094:
1083:(3): 479–497.
1067:
1054:
1041:
1010:
1009:
1007:
1004:
1002:
1001:
996:
994:Wicked problem
991:
989:Voting paradox
986:
981:
976:
971:
966:
961:
956:
951:
946:
941:
936:
931:
926:
921:
916:
911:
906:
901:
895:
893:
890:
873:neuroeconomics
857:climate change
851:
850:
806:
804:
797:
791:
788:
744:overharvesting
716:
713:
691:
688:
659:
656:
650:
647:
627:climate change
622:
619:
598:
595:
593:
590:
578:Anwar El Sadat
544:
541:
535:
532:
498:
495:
446:Main article:
443:
440:
434:
431:
392:
389:
366:
363:
337:
334:
330:Centipede game
318:Snowdrift game
301:
300:
297:
292:
284:
283:
278:
275:
267:
266:
259:
252:
234:
231:
200:
197:
195:
192:
184:invisible hand
162:Mancur Olson's
157:
156:Modern thought
154:
108:
105:
103:
100:
55:Mancur Olson's
43:social dilemma
26:
24:
18:Social dilemma
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3771:
3760:
3757:
3755:
3752:
3750:
3747:
3745:
3742:
3740:
3737:
3735:
3732:
3730:
3727:
3725:
3722:
3720:
3717:
3715:
3712:
3710:
3707:
3706:
3704:
3689:
3688:Organizations
3686:
3684:
3683:
3674:
3672:
3664:
3662:
3658:
3654:
3653:
3650:
3644:
3641:
3638:
3634:
3631:
3629:
3626:
3624:
3621:
3619:
3616:
3614:
3611:
3609:
3606:
3604:
3601:
3599:
3596:
3594:
3591:
3589:
3586:
3584:
3581:
3579:
3576:
3574:
3571:
3569:
3566:
3564:
3561:
3559:
3556:
3554:
3551:
3549:
3548:Disinvestment
3546:
3544:
3541:
3539:
3536:
3534:
3531:
3529:
3526:
3524:
3521:
3519:
3516:
3515:
3513:
3509:
3503:
3500:
3497:
3496:certification
3493:
3490:
3487:
3486:certification
3483:
3482:Environmental
3480:
3478:
3475:
3474:
3472:
3470:
3466:
3460:
3457:
3455:
3452:
3450:
3447:
3446:
3444:
3440:
3434:
3431:
3429:
3426:
3424:
3420:
3416:
3412:
3408:
3405:
3403:
3400:
3398:
3395:
3393:
3390:
3388:
3385:
3383:
3379:
3375:
3371:
3367:
3364:
3362:
3359:
3357:
3354:
3352:
3349:
3348:
3346:
3344:
3341:Environmental
3338:
3332:
3329:
3327:
3324:
3322:
3319:
3317:
3314:
3312:
3309:
3307:
3304:
3302:
3299:
3296:
3293:
3291:
3288:
3286:
3285:environmental
3282:
3279:
3277:
3274:
3272:
3269:
3267:
3264:
3262:
3259:
3258:
3256:
3254:
3248:
3243:
3233:
3230:
3228:
3225:
3223:
3220:
3218:
3215:
3213:
3210:
3208:
3205:
3203:
3200:
3198:
3195:
3193:
3190:
3188:
3185:
3183:
3180:
3178:
3175:
3173:
3170:
3168:
3165:
3163:
3160:
3158:
3155:
3153:
3150:
3148:
3145:
3143:
3140:
3138:
3135:
3133:
3129:
3125:
3121:
3117:
3113:
3110:
3108:
3105:
3103:
3099:
3095:
3091:
3087:
3084:
3082:
3079:
3077:
3074:
3073:
3071:
3066:
3062:
3058:
3055:
3054:environmental
3051:
3044:
3039:
3037:
3032:
3030:
3025:
3024:
3021:
3015:
3012:
3011:
3007:
3000:
2994:
2990:
2985:
2981:
2977:
2973:
2969:
2965:
2961:
2957:
2953:
2948:
2944:
2940:
2936:
2932:
2925:
2920:
2916:
2912:
2907:
2902:
2898:
2894:
2890:
2886:
2879:
2874:
2870:
2866:
2862:
2858:
2854:
2850:
2846:
2841:
2837:
2831:
2827:
2822:
2818:
2812:
2808:
2803:
2799:
2795:
2791:
2787:
2782:
2775:
2771:
2767:
2763:
2759:
2755:
2751:
2747:
2743:
2736:
2731:
2727:
2722:
2717:
2716:2027.42/50454
2712:
2708:
2704:
2700:
2696:
2689:
2684:
2681:
2677:
2673:
2667:
2663:
2658:
2654:
2650:
2645:
2640:
2636:
2632:
2628:
2624:
2619:
2615:
2611:
2607:
2603:
2602:
2596:
2592:
2588:
2584:
2580:
2575:
2571:
2567:
2563:
2559:
2554:
2550:
2544:
2540:
2535:
2534:
2529:
2520:
2514:
2506:
2499:
2496:
2491:
2487:
2482:
2477:
2472:
2467:
2463:
2459:
2455:
2448:
2445:
2440:
2434:
2426:
2422:
2418:
2414:
2407:
2404:
2399:
2395:
2391:
2387:
2382:
2377:
2373:
2369:
2365:
2361:
2357:
2353:
2346:
2344:
2340:
2335:
2331:
2327:
2323:
2316:
2309:
2306:
2301:
2294:
2291:
2286:
2279:
2276:
2271:
2267:
2263:
2259:
2252:
2249:
2244:
2240:
2236:
2232:
2225:
2222:
2217:
2211:
2203:
2196:
2193:
2188:
2181:
2178:
2170:
2166:
2162:
2158:
2154:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2138:
2131:
2124:
2121:
2116:
2112:
2107:
2102:
2098:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2079:
2072:
2069:
2064:
2060:
2056:
2052:
2045:
2042:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2021:
2016:
2012:
2008:
2001:
1994:
1991:
1979:
1975:
1969:
1966:
1961:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1941:
1937:
1933:
1926:
1924:
1920:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1888:
1885:
1874:on 2018-12-09
1873:
1869:
1865:
1859:
1856:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1839:
1832:
1829:
1825:
1819:
1816:
1811:
1807:
1803:
1799:
1792:
1789:
1784:
1780:
1775:
1770:
1766:
1762:
1758:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1742:
1735:
1732:
1727:
1723:
1718:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1700:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1683:
1676:
1673:
1669:
1663:
1660:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1636:
1633:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1585:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1569:
1566:
1561:
1554:
1552:
1548:
1537:
1533:
1527:
1525:
1523:
1519:
1513:
1509:
1505:
1501:
1494:
1491:
1485:
1482:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1458:
1455:
1449:
1448:2027.42/50454
1444:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1421:
1418:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1378:
1375:
1370:
1357:
1349:
1342:
1335:
1332:
1327:
1314:
1295:
1288:
1281:
1278:
1271:
1268:
1262:
1259:
1248:
1244:
1238:
1235:
1223:
1219:
1213:
1210:
1199:on 2018-04-16
1198:
1194:
1190:
1184:
1181:
1178:
1172:
1169:
1164:
1160:
1155:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1141:Public Choice
1138:
1131:
1129:
1125:
1120:
1117:Hume, David.
1113:
1110:
1105:
1098:
1095:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1071:
1068:
1064:
1058:
1055:
1044:
1042:9780199670840
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1015:
1012:
1005:
1000:
999:Zero-sum game
997:
995:
992:
990:
987:
985:
982:
980:
977:
975:
972:
970:
967:
965:
962:
960:
957:
955:
952:
950:
947:
945:
942:
940:
937:
935:
934:Moral economy
932:
930:
927:
925:
922:
920:
919:Elinor Ostrom
917:
915:
912:
910:
907:
905:
902:
900:
897:
896:
891:
889:
887:
883:
879:
874:
870:
869:Elinor Ostrom
864:
862:
858:
847:
844:
836:
826:
822:
816:
815:
811:
805:
796:
795:
789:
787:
785:
781:
777:
771:
767:
765:
761:
760:privatization
756:
752:
749:
745:
740:
737:
733:
728:
723:
714:
712:
708:
706:
700:
697:
689:
687:
683:
679:
677:
676:communication
672:
668:
665:
657:
655:
648:
646:
642:
640:
636:
632:
628:
620:
618:
615:
611:
606:
604:
596:
591:
589:
587:
583:
579:
576:
571:
569:
565:
561:
557:
552:
550:
542:
540:
533:
531:
527:
525:
520:
512:
508:
503:
496:
494:
492:
488:
483:
481:
476:
474:
470:
466:
458:
454:
449:
441:
439:
432:
430:
427:
422:
420:
416:
415:nonexcludable
412:
407:
404:
398:
390:
388:
386:
382:
377:
372:
364:
362:
360:
356:
352:
347:
343:
335:
333:
331:
327:
323:
319:
314:
312:
306:
298:
293:
290:
286:
285:
279:
276:
273:
269:
268:
264:
260:
257:
253:
251:
250:
247:
244:
239:
230:
228:
223:
219:
211:
206:
198:
193:
191:
187:
185:
181:
176:
171:
169:
168:
163:
155:
153:
151:
144:
139:
137:
136:
131:
127:
124:
120:
119:
114:
113:Thomas Hobbes
107:Early thought
106:
101:
99:
97:
93:
89:
85:
84:voter turnout
81:
77:
73:
69:
63:
61:
60:
56:
52:
48:
44:
40:
33:
19:
3680:
3553:Eco-labeling
3528:Child labour
3423:supply chain
3421: /
3417: /
3413: /
3409: /
3380: /
3376: /
3372: /
3368: /
3142:Ethical code
3130: /
3126: /
3122: /
3118: /
3114: /
3100: /
3096: /
3092: /
3088: /
2988:
2955:
2951:
2934:
2930:
2888:
2884:
2852:
2848:
2825:
2806:
2789:
2785:
2774:the original
2745:
2741:
2725:
2698:
2694:
2661:
2626:
2622:
2605:
2599:
2582:
2578:
2570:the original
2565:
2561:
2538:
2504:
2498:
2461:
2457:
2447:
2433:cite journal
2416:
2412:
2406:
2355:
2351:
2325:
2321:
2308:
2299:
2293:
2284:
2278:
2261:
2257:
2251:
2234:
2230:
2224:
2201:
2195:
2186:
2180:
2169:the original
2140:
2136:
2123:
2088:
2084:
2071:
2054:
2050:
2044:
2033:the original
2010:
2006:
1993:
1982:. Retrieved
1980:. 2012-03-07
1977:
1968:
1935:
1931:
1897:
1893:
1887:
1876:. Retrieved
1872:the original
1867:
1858:
1841:
1837:
1831:
1823:
1818:
1801:
1797:
1791:
1748:
1744:
1734:
1689:
1685:
1675:
1667:
1666:W F Lloyd -
1662:
1645:
1641:
1635:
1594:
1590:
1573:
1568:
1539:. Retrieved
1535:
1503:
1499:
1493:
1484:
1467:
1463:
1457:
1430:
1426:
1420:
1387:
1383:
1377:
1356:cite journal
1334:
1313:cite journal
1301:. Retrieved
1294:the original
1280:
1270:
1261:
1250:. Retrieved
1246:
1237:
1226:. Retrieved
1221:
1212:
1201:. Retrieved
1197:the original
1192:
1183:
1171:
1144:
1140:
1118:
1112:
1103:
1097:
1080:
1076:
1070:
1062:
1057:
1046:. Retrieved
1024:
1014:
944:Non-zero-sum
865:
854:
839:
830:
808:
783:
779:
775:
772:
768:
757:
753:
741:
735:
727:public goods
718:
709:
701:
693:
684:
680:
673:
669:
661:
652:
643:
624:
607:
600:
572:
560:Soviet Union
553:
546:
537:
528:
516:
497:Social traps
491:Atlantic Cod
484:
477:
462:
457:Atlantic cod
436:
423:
408:
403:public goods
400:
391:Public goods
384:
368:
342:selfish gene
339:
315:
307:
304:
288:
271:
262:
255:
240:
236:
220:
216:
188:
180:Adam Smith's
172:
165:
159:
146:
141:
133:
128:
117:
110:
96:public goods
64:
57:
42:
38:
36:
3633:Stakeholder
3411:measurement
3152:Externality
3107:Dirty hands
2701:: 153–163.
2629:: 183–214.
2585:: 169–193.
2381:11059/14638
1576:(pp. 1–14).
1433:: 153–163.
959:Social trap
954:Rationality
924:Game theory
790:Conclusions
776:sub-optimal
732:sanctioning
722:cooperation
696:Tit for tat
592:In politics
543:In conflict
519:social trap
469:common good
351:Reciprocity
222:Game theory
205:Game theory
199:Game theory
175:public good
88:game theory
3703:Categories
3637:engagement
3492:Fair trade
3343:accounting
3276:Higg Index
3253:accounting
3069:principles
2906:1871/17714
1984:2018-04-18
1878:2018-04-18
1692:: 627559.
1541:2018-04-18
1252:2018-04-18
1228:2018-04-18
1203:2018-04-18
1048:2018-04-11
1006:References
886:psychology
810:neutrality
395:See also:
381:heuristics
359:reputation
328:, and the
272:cooperates
256:cooperates
203:See also:
164:1965 book
130:David Hume
68:psychology
3578:Euthenics
3543:Disasters
3502:ISO 19011
3442:Reporting
3392:ISO 14031
3387:ISO 14000
3306:ISO 45001
3301:ISO 26000
3182:Pollution
3116:in Russia
3090:behaviour
2869:145217407
2513:cite book
2210:cite book
2015:CiteSeerX
1960:142706143
1952:1467-9248
1844:: 67–86.
1765:0197-5897
1708:2296-2565
1163:0048-5829
1104:Leviathan
878:economics
821:talk page
736:graduated
322:Stag hunt
150:free ride
118:Leviathan
72:economics
3714:Dilemmas
3671:Category
3469:Auditing
3290:equality
2972:15454350
2490:17881578
2398:39710673
2390:19628857
2115:36485882
1783:35995942
1726:33643992
1627:45088691
1619:15947186
1404:15454350
892:See also
833:May 2024
814:disputed
556:Cold War
411:nonrival
194:Theories
90:and the
82:and low
3682:Commons
3635: (
3511:Related
3494: (
3484: (
3283: (
3227:social)
2980:1525372
2915:9325591
2770:4281385
2750:Bibcode
2481:2000497
2360:Bibcode
2352:Science
2165:4281385
2145:Bibcode
1914:2657465
1774:9395903
1717:7905028
1599:Bibcode
1591:Science
1412:1525372
289:defects
263:defects
3321:SA8000
3295:social
3251:Social
3192:Racism
3065:Ethics
3050:Social
2995:
2978:
2970:
2913:
2867:
2832:
2813:
2768:
2742:Nature
2668:
2653:223479
2651:
2545:
2488:
2478:
2396:
2388:
2163:
2137:Nature
2113:
2017:
1958:
1950:
1912:
1781:
1771:
1763:
1724:
1714:
1706:
1670:(1833)
1625:
1617:
1410:
1402:
1303:May 2,
1275:Press.
1161:
1039:
884:, and
780:failed
748:leader
597:Voting
582:Israel
511:Greece
507:Athens
385:et al.
324:, the
74:, and
2976:S2CID
2927:(PDF)
2881:(PDF)
2865:S2CID
2777:(PDF)
2766:S2CID
2738:(PDF)
2691:(PDF)
2649:JSTOR
2394:S2CID
2318:(PDF)
2172:(PDF)
2161:S2CID
2133:(PDF)
2111:S2CID
2081:(PDF)
2036:(PDF)
2003:(PDF)
1956:S2CID
1910:JSTOR
1623:S2CID
1408:S2CID
1297:(PDF)
1290:(PDF)
562:) of
355:dyads
3157:Harm
3052:and
2993:ISBN
2968:PMID
2911:PMID
2830:ISBN
2811:ISBN
2666:ISBN
2543:ISBN
2519:link
2486:PMID
2439:link
2386:PMID
2216:link
1948:ISSN
1779:PMID
1761:ISSN
1722:PMID
1704:ISSN
1615:PMID
1400:PMID
1369:help
1326:help
1305:2020
1159:ISSN
1037:ISBN
807:The
463:The
413:and
241:The
3067:and
2960:doi
2939:doi
2901:hdl
2893:doi
2857:doi
2794:doi
2758:doi
2746:355
2711:hdl
2703:doi
2699:108
2639:hdl
2631:doi
2610:doi
2587:doi
2476:PMC
2466:doi
2462:104
2421:doi
2417:101
2376:hdl
2368:doi
2356:325
2330:doi
2266:doi
2239:doi
2153:doi
2141:355
2101:hdl
2093:doi
2059:doi
2025:doi
1940:doi
1902:doi
1846:doi
1806:doi
1769:PMC
1753:doi
1712:PMC
1694:doi
1650:doi
1607:doi
1595:308
1508:doi
1472:doi
1443:hdl
1435:doi
1431:108
1392:doi
1149:doi
1145:164
1085:doi
1029:doi
859:to
784:not
778:or
41:or
3705::
2974:.
2966:.
2954:.
2935:76
2933:.
2929:.
2909:.
2899:.
2889:73
2887:.
2883:.
2863:.
2853:52
2851:.
2790:35
2788:.
2764:.
2756:.
2744:.
2740:.
2709:.
2697:.
2693:.
2647:.
2637:.
2627:24
2625:.
2606:35
2604:.
2583:31
2581:.
2564:.
2560:.
2515:}}
2511:{{
2484:.
2474:.
2460:.
2456:.
2435:}}
2431:{{
2415:.
2392:.
2384:.
2374:.
2366:.
2354:.
2342:^
2326:76
2324:.
2320:.
2262:42
2260:.
2235:51
2233:.
2212:}}
2208:{{
2159:.
2151:.
2139:.
2135:.
2109:.
2099:.
2089:20
2087:.
2083:.
2055:54
2053:.
2023:.
2011:25
2009:.
2005:.
1976:.
1954:.
1946:.
1936:59
1934:.
1922:^
1908:.
1898:65
1896:.
1866:.
1842:39
1840:.
1802:28
1800:.
1777:.
1767:.
1759:.
1749:43
1747:.
1743:.
1720:.
1710:.
1702:.
1688:.
1684:.
1646:13
1644:.
1621:.
1613:.
1605:.
1593:.
1581:^
1550:^
1534:.
1521:^
1504:65
1502:.
1468:66
1466:.
1441:.
1429:.
1406:.
1398:.
1386:.
1360::
1358:}}
1354:{{
1346:.
1317::
1315:}}
1311:{{
1245:.
1220:.
1191:.
1157:.
1143:.
1139:.
1127:^
1081:71
1079:.
1035:.
1023:.
888:.
880:,
766:.
629:,
588:.
517:A
509:,
475:.
401:A
332:.
320:,
313:.
291:)
274:)
265:)
70:,
62:.
37:A
3639:)
3498:)
3488:)
3297:)
3042:e
3035:t
3028:v
3001:.
2982:.
2962::
2956:8
2945:.
2941::
2917:.
2903::
2895::
2871:.
2859::
2838:.
2819:.
2800:.
2796::
2760::
2752::
2719:.
2713::
2705::
2674:.
2655:.
2641::
2633::
2616:.
2612::
2593:.
2589::
2566:6
2551:.
2521:)
2492:.
2468::
2441:)
2427:.
2423::
2400:.
2378::
2370::
2362::
2336:.
2332::
2302:.
2287:.
2272:.
2268::
2245:.
2241::
2218:)
2155::
2147::
2117:.
2103::
2095::
2065:.
2061::
2027::
1987:.
1962:.
1942::
1916:.
1904::
1881:.
1852:.
1848::
1812:.
1808::
1785:.
1755::
1728:.
1696::
1690:9
1656:.
1652::
1629:.
1609::
1601::
1562:.
1544:.
1514:.
1510::
1478:.
1474::
1451:.
1445::
1437::
1414:.
1394::
1388:8
1371:)
1367:(
1350:.
1328:)
1324:(
1307:.
1255:.
1231:.
1206:.
1165:.
1151::
1121:.
1106:.
1091:.
1087::
1051:.
1031::
846:)
840:(
835:)
831:(
827:.
817:.
513:.
258:)
34:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.