179:
857:
possible to low lying shrubs/bushes, particularly of the evergreen variety. Moderate damage to trees, with a few medium sized branches in leaf snapping on the upper bound of T1, trees without leaves on them likely remaining mostly unscathed except for significant twig breakage, although for some a few small branches could break. Very weak/unhealthy trees, particularly those in leaf and of softwood variety such as conifers are likely to be nearly or completely uprooted.
656:
1020:
warehouse-type constructions may buckle slightly. Well built steel reinforced concrete buildings/houses suffer total roof loss with some damage to overall structure though most walls remain standing, particularly the lower floors. Trains whether stationary or not are blown over. All large branches torn/stripped from trees down to the trunk, some small-medium sized trees are thrown. Noticeable debarking of any standing tree trunks from flying debris.
703:
change of type of railway locomotives, and was written in an environment where tornadoes of F2 or stronger are extremely rare, so little or no first-hand investigation of actual damage at the upper end of the scale was possible. The TORRO scale has more graduations than the F scale which makes it arguably more useful for tornadoes on the lower end of the scale; however, such accuracy and precision are not typically attainable in practice.
882:
plastic/glass roofing cover with a total collapse of some weak/average greenhouse structures likely. Garage roofs torn away, some to significant damage to tiled roofs and chimney stacks with many tiles missing, particularly to weak wooden framed homes, though typically thatched roofs with small eaves/smooth surface suffer only minor damage, outbuildings lose entire roofs and suffer some degree of damage to actual structure.
77:
1070:
likely to be flipped and rolled repeatedly some distance away from tracks with some levitation likely along the way. Strong brick masonry buildings/houses almost or completely destroyed with large sections of houses/building blown away from foundation. Concrete pathways slightly above soil level could be shifted in position by several inches. Complete debarking of any standing tree-trunks.
36:
971:
likely inside of these buildings. Stronger brick masonry homes may lose a few rows of bricks on second floor, though overall structure below roof itself largely standing with bottom floor relatively intact except for doors and windows, the roof mostly or entirely blown/torn off. The oldest, weakest buildings may collapse completely.
994:
buildings collapse, national grid pylons severely damaged or blown down/bent and deformed, Strong trees that aren't uprooted /snapped will suffer major debranching with most leaves torn off, other trees excluding the widest and strongest ones are snapped/uprooted, very large heavy branches thrown large distances.
698:
replaced the original Fujita Scale from 1971. It made substantial improvements in standardizing damage descriptors through expanding and refining damage indicators and associated degrees of damage, as well as calibrated tornado wind speeds to better match the associated damage. However, the EF Scale,
1123:
In terms of man made objects, only the very heaviest ones for example locomotives/trains weighing hundreds of tons and the strongest of buildings made low to the ground with specific very aerodynamic designs and incredibly thick load bearing steel concrete walls with no windows/discernible roof will
831:
Loose light litter such as paper, leaves and twigs raised from ground level in spirals. Secured tents and marquees seriously disturbed; a few exposed tiles/slates on roofs dislodged. Twigs and perhaps weak small branches that are in leaf snapped from some trees; minimal or no damage to trees with no
881:
Heavy mobile homes displaced with some damage to exterior, light caravans lose majority of roof and/or are blown over, particularly from upper bound winds of T2, bonnets blown open on some vehicles, average strength sturdy garden sheds destroyed, greenhouses of weak/average construction lose entire
702:
Unlike with the F scale, no analyses have been undertaken at all to establish the veracity and accuracy of the T scale damage descriptors. The scale was written in the early 1970s, and does not take into account changes such as the growth in weight of vehicles or the great reduction in numbers and
711:
stated that "the problems associated with damage surveys and uncertainties associated with estimating wind speed from observed damage make highly precise assignments dubious". In survey reports, Fujita ratings sometimes also have extra qualifications added ("minimal F2" or "upper-end F3 damage"),
1069:
Many steel-framed/concrete buildings badly damaged though some of structure may remain standing albeit shifted in position on foundation; skyscrapers toppled; locomotives or trains likely blown over and rolled a short distance from tracks with damage to its exterior, empty train cars however are
1044:
Cars and other larger/heavier vehicles such as trucks hurled great distances. Strong wooden-framed houses and their contents dispersed over long distances; strong stone or brick masonry buildings severely damaged or largely destroyed with one or two sections of walls blown away; steel reinforced
912:
Mobile homes overturned / badly damaged; light caravans severely damaged or destroyed; garages and weak outbuildings severely damaged or destroyed; house roof timbers considerably exposed with more strongly built brick masonry houses suffering major roof damage with chimneys at risk of collapse,
970:
Strong framed wooden buildings/weak brick masonry buildings receive more significant damage than T4 though walls on ground floor will probably remain, some wall damage on second/upper floor connected to roof is likely though with one or two walls blowing down/collapsing, some/significant damage
690:
in that it is "purely" a wind speed scale, whereas the Fujita scale relies on damage for classification, but in practice, damage is utilised almost exclusively in both systems to infer intensity. That is because such a proxy for intensity is usually all that is available, although users of both
937:
Cars levitated. Mobile homes/lighter caravans airborne / destroyed; garden sheds obliterated and airborne for considerable distances; entire roofs removed from some houses; roof timbers of stronger brick or stone houses completely exposed; gable ends torn away. "Weak" framed wooden houses will
856:
Deckchairs, small plants/plants in small pots, heavy litter becomes airborne; minor damage to sheds. More serious/numerous dislodging of tiles, slates and chimney pots with some tiles/slates blown off typical/average strength roofs. Low quality wooden fences damaged or flattened. Slight damage
1019:
Strongly built wooden-framed/weak brick masonry buildings/houses wholly demolished; some walls of more strongly built stone / brick masonry houses beaten down or collapse with significant damage to overall structure, with some shifting on foundations likely; skyscrapers twisted; steel-framed
993:
Strong framed wooden buildings largely or completely destroyed, Strongly built brick masonry houses lose entire roofs just like T5 though exterior walls on second floor now likely blown down or collapsed with significant interior damage, windows broken on skyscrapers, more of the less-strong
1119:
Exceptionally well built very thick walled (40-80cm) brick masonry buildings are completely destroyed and swept off foundations entirely with only flooring or foundations remaining with even these potentially damaged or with sections pulled off entirely; Well built steel-reinforced concrete
699:
having been designed based on construction practices in the United States, is not necessarily applicable across all regions. The EF-scale and variants thereof are officially used by the United States, Canada, France, and Japan, as well as unofficially in other countries, such as China.
1124:"survive" a tornado of this strength, survival would be reliant on these specialised structures or out of path of the tornado itself. But the precise design needed and possibility of it actually successfully providing adequate safety during such a tornado is very speculative for now.
913:
though structure/walls of the building below roof itself mostly intact except for windows breaking especially from any small flying objects. Most large healthy trees lose many big branches and many are snapped or uprooted, lighter cars flipped.
715:
Tornadoes are rated after they have passed and have been examined, not whilst in progress. In rating the intensity of a tornado, both direct measurements and inferences from empirical observations of the effects of a tornado are used. Few
691:
scales would prefer direct, objective, quantitative measurements. The scale is primarily used in the United
Kingdom whereas the Fujita scale has been the primary scale used in North America, continental Europe, and the rest of the world.
1094:
Entire very well built houses/buildings lifted bodily or completely from foundations and carried a large distance to disintegrate. Steel-reinforced concrete buildings severely damaged or almost obliterated. (e.g. 1930 Montello tornado)
744:
estimates wind speed by measuring tracers in the vortex. In most cases, aerial and ground damage surveys of structures and vegetation are utilised, sometimes with engineering analysis. Also sometimes available are ground swirl patterns
1045:
concrete homes/large buildings suffer significant to major structural damage. Skyscrapers badly twisted and may show a visible lean to one side; shallowly anchored high rises may be toppled; other steel-framed buildings buckled.
962:
Heavy vehicles such as buses/lorries (trucks) overturned or overturned and displaced some distance in excess of 10 metres though with minimal levitation, lighter vehicles such as passenger cars thrown large distances.
749:
marks) left in the wake of a tornado. If an on site analysis is not possible, either for retrospective ratings or when personnel cannot reach a site, photographs, videos, or descriptions of damage may be utilised.
966:
Wind turbines built from strong material suffer significant blade damage with blades ending up shredded or broken/ possibly suffering permanent deformation of tower/blades with winds on the upper bounds of T5.
1371:
1388:
762:
are listed below, in order of increasing intensity. Although the wind speeds and photographic damage examples are updated, which are more or less still accurate. However, for the actual
694:
At the 2004 European
Conference on Severe Storms, Dr. Meaden proposed a unification of the TORRO and Fujita scales as the Tornado Force or TF Scale. In 2007 in the United States, the
938:
receive some damage to structure though most of structure still standing. Numerous strong trees uprooted or snapped with all trees within damage path receiving some debranching.
640:
1581:
1227:
1548:
Meaden, G. T. (1985). "A study of tornadoes in
Britain, with assessments of the general tornado risk potential and the specific risk potential at particular regional sites".
888:
Significant damage to most tree types, some big branches twisted or snapped off, most small and shallow rooted trees whether in leaf or not are uprooted or snapped.
266:
997:
Lighter vehicles thrown upto a mile in some cases, heavy vehicles such as buses lofted and tossed tens of metres away, trains derailed/blown over while in motion.
293:
in 1975. The scale sets T0 as the equivalent of 8 on the
Beaufort scale and is related to the Beaufort scale (B), up to 12 on the Beaufort scale, by the formula:
1368:
712:
made by investigators who have experience of many similar tornadoes and relating to the fact that the F scale is a damage scale, not a wind speed scale.
1207:
766:
in practice, damage indicators (the type of structure which has been damaged) are predominantly used in determining the tornado intensity.
1575:
200:
1403:
885:
Guttering pulled from some houses with some siding damage possible, older single glazed windows blown in or out of frames or smashed.
1231:
1569:
1523:
1305:
240:
222:
160:
63:
1120:
structures/homes are completely destroyed. Tall buildings collapse. Cars, trucks and train cars thrown in excess of 1-3 miles.
1618:
1424:
Chen, Jiayi; Cai, Xuhui; Wang, Hongyu; Kang, Ling; Zhang, Hongshen; Song, Yu; Zhu, Hao; Zheng, Wei; Li, Fengju (April 2018).
1249:
1192:
454:
98:
1587:
141:
1197:
290:
113:
94:
49:
193:
187:
427:
was first introduced in 1805, and in 1921 quantified. It expresses the wind speed as faster than v in the formula:
120:
87:
204:
1275:
127:
1603:
1550:
1535:
708:
450:
1347:
584:
1329:
695:
109:
1487:
1437:
1533:
Meaden, G. T. (1976). "Tornadoes in
Britain: Their intensities and distribution in space and time".
486:
1511:
1245:
538:
1519:
1453:
1425:
1297:
449:
Most UK tornadoes are T6 or below with the strongest known UK tornado estimated as a T8 (the
17:
1613:
1495:
1471:
1445:
1202:
704:
574:
556:
471:
438:
55:
1375:
729:
134:
1491:
1441:
669:
Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.
741:
737:
725:
501:
453:). For comparison, the strongest detected winds in a United States tornado (during the
424:
278:
274:
1499:
1608:
1597:
1476:"Some aspects of the international climatology of tornadoes by damage classification"
733:
687:
1253:
1333:
516:
270:
76:
1298:"The International Fujita (IF) Scale: Tornado and Wind Damage Assessment Guide"
289:
The scale was tested from 1972 to 1975 and was made public at a meeting of the
1321:
717:
527:
1457:
746:
534:
is TORRO intensity number. Wind speed is defined as a 3-second gust at 10
1404:"The Japanese Enhanced Fujita Scale: Its Development and Implementation"
721:
720:
are struck by a tornado, and even fewer survive, so there are very few
265:
intensity between T0 and T11. It was proposed by
Terence Meaden of the
262:
1449:
1516:
Significant
Tornadoes 1680-1991, A Chronology and Analysis of Events
1475:
1322:"Assessment of Tornados with the Enhanced Fujita Scale in Romania"
566:
548:
535:
507:
492:
477:
462:
431:
1518:. St. Johnsbury, VT: The Tornado Project of Environmental Films.
724:
measurements. Therefore, almost all ratings are obtained from
649:
172:
70:
29:
1389:"Intensité des tornades : l'échelle de Fujita améliorée"
1320:
Nucuta, C.; Timis, C.; Butiu, C.; Scridonesi, O. (2011).
1230:. Tornado and Storm Research Organisation. Archived from
1102:
1077:
1052:
1027:
1002:
976:
945:
920:
895:
864:
839:
814:
1582:
Wind speed scales: Beaufort, T Scale, and Fujita's Scale
544:
Alternatively, the T-Scale formula may be expressed as:
1132:
768:
587:
101:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
634:
1588:Determination of tornado or downburst intensity
267:Tornado and Storm Research Organisation (TORRO)
646:Rating process and comparisons to Fujita scale
457:) would be T11 using the following formulas:
8:
1326:Babes Bolyai University Faculty of Geography
64:Learn how and when to remove these messages
285:History and derivation from Beaufort scale
1369:Measuring tornadoes: F-scale vs. EF-scale
616:
612:
600:
586:
241:Learn how and when to remove this message
223:Learn how and when to remove this message
161:Learn how and when to remove this message
1179:
1176:
1173:
322:
186:This article includes a list of general
1250:"The Fujita Scale of Tornado Intensity"
1226:Meaden, Terence; TORRO members (2004).
1218:
1208:List of tornadoes and tornado outbreaks
736:is used when available, and sometimes
1252:. The Tornado Project. Archived from
832:leaves, trail visible through crops.
7:
1576:T-Scale Origins and Scientific Basis
1430:International Journal of Climatology
99:adding citations to reliable sources
1276:"The Enhanced Fujita Tornado Scale"
635:{\displaystyle T=(v/2.365)^{2/3}-4}
1402:Suzuki, Shota; Tanaka, Yoshinobu.
1348:"Enhanced Fujita Scale (EF-Scale)"
192:it lacks sufficient corresponding
27:Scale for rating tornado intensity
25:
1474:; Charles A. Doswell III (2001).
1350:. Environment Canada. 10 May 2013
1306:European Severe Storms Laboratory
686:TORRO claims it differs from the
45:This article has multiple issues.
654:
177:
75:
34:
1278:. National Climatic Data Center
1067:Intensely -devastating damage.
1017:Strongly - devastating damage.
991:Moderately-devastating damage.
86:needs additional citations for
53:or discuss these issues on the
1426:"Tornado climatology of China"
1193:Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale
1042:Severely - devastating damage
609:
594:
455:1999 Oklahoma tornado outbreak
1:
1570:TORRO Tornado Intensity Scale
1500:10.1016/S0169-8095(00)00098-3
255:TORRO tornado intensity scale
18:TORRO tornado intensity scale
1198:Tornado intensity and damage
291:Royal Meteorological Society
1411:Japan Meteorological Agency
1228:"Tornado Force or TF Scale"
1635:
758:The 12 categories for the
1296:IF Scale Steering Group.
790:
785:
776:
771:
663:This section needs to be
277:, as an extension of the
1274:Godfrey, Elaine (2008).
416:
413:
410:
407:
404:
401:
398:
395:
392:
389:
386:
383:
368:
365:
362:
359:
356:
353:
350:
347:
344:
341:
338:
335:
261:) is a scale measuring
207:more precise citations.
1551:Journal of Meteorology
1536:Journal of Meteorology
1374:April 9, 2012, at the
754:TORRO scale parameters
636:
451:London tornado of 1091
1619:Scales in meteorology
732:from damage surveys.
696:Enhanced Fujita Scale
637:
1480:Atmospheric Research
585:
273:organisation in the
95:improve this article
1512:Grazulis, Thomas P.
1492:2001AtmRe..56..191B
1442:2018IJCli..38.2478C
1117:Phenomenal damage.
445:TORRO scale formula
632:
1184:
1183:
1131:
1130:
879:Moderate damage.
792:Example of damage
728:techniques or as
684:
683:
421:
420:
251:
250:
243:
233:
232:
225:
171:
170:
163:
145:
68:
16:(Redirected from
1626:
1559:
1558:(79). UK: 151–3.
1544:
1543:(8). UK: 242–51.
1529:
1504:
1503:
1486:(1–4): 191–201.
1468:
1462:
1461:
1450:10.1002/joc.5369
1436:(5): 2478–2489.
1421:
1415:
1414:
1408:
1399:
1393:
1392:
1384:
1378:
1366:
1360:
1359:
1357:
1355:
1344:
1338:
1337:
1317:
1311:
1310:
1302:
1293:
1287:
1286:
1284:
1283:
1271:
1265:
1264:
1262:
1261:
1242:
1236:
1235:
1223:
1203:Wind engineering
1133:
960:Intense damage.
787:Potential damage
769:
679:
676:
670:
658:
657:
650:
641:
639:
638:
633:
625:
624:
620:
604:
323:
308:and conversely:
246:
239:
228:
221:
217:
214:
208:
203:this article by
194:inline citations
181:
180:
173:
166:
159:
155:
152:
146:
144:
103:
79:
71:
60:
38:
37:
30:
21:
1634:
1633:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1594:
1593:
1566:
1547:
1532:
1526:
1510:
1507:
1470:
1469:
1465:
1423:
1422:
1418:
1406:
1401:
1400:
1396:
1386:
1385:
1381:
1376:Wayback Machine
1367:
1363:
1353:
1351:
1346:
1345:
1341:
1319:
1318:
1314:
1300:
1295:
1294:
1290:
1281:
1279:
1273:
1272:
1268:
1259:
1257:
1244:
1243:
1239:
1225:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1189:
935:Severe damage.
910:Strong damage.
780:
756:
680:
674:
671:
668:
659:
655:
648:
608:
583:
582:
447:
287:
247:
236:
235:
234:
229:
218:
212:
209:
199:Please help to
198:
182:
178:
167:
156:
150:
147:
104:
102:
92:
80:
39:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1632:
1630:
1622:
1621:
1616:
1611:
1606:
1596:
1595:
1592:
1591:
1585:
1579:
1573:
1565:
1564:External links
1562:
1561:
1560:
1545:
1530:
1524:
1506:
1505:
1472:Brooks, Harold
1463:
1416:
1394:
1379:
1361:
1339:
1312:
1288:
1266:
1237:
1234:on 2010-04-30.
1217:
1215:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1205:
1200:
1195:
1188:
1185:
1182:
1181:
1178:
1175:
1171:
1170:
1167:
1164:
1161:
1158:
1155:
1152:
1149:
1146:
1143:
1140:
1137:
1129:
1128:
1126:
1115:
1112:
1109:
1106:
1100:
1099:
1097:
1092:Super damage.
1090:
1087:
1084:
1081:
1075:
1074:
1072:
1065:
1062:
1059:
1056:
1050:
1049:
1047:
1040:
1037:
1034:
1031:
1025:
1024:
1022:
1015:
1012:
1009:
1006:
1000:
999:
989:
986:
983:
980:
974:
973:
958:
955:
952:
949:
943:
942:
940:
933:
930:
927:
924:
918:
917:
915:
908:
905:
902:
899:
893:
892:
890:
877:
874:
871:
868:
862:
861:
859:
852:
849:
846:
843:
837:
836:
834:
829:Light damage.
827:
824:
821:
818:
812:
811:
806:
801:
795:
794:
789:
784:
775:
755:
752:
742:videogrammetry
738:photogrammetry
726:remote sensing
682:
681:
662:
660:
653:
647:
644:
643:
642:
631:
628:
623:
619:
615:
611:
607:
603:
599:
596:
593:
590:
580:
577:
560:
559:
520:
519:
504:
489:
474:
446:
443:
442:
441:
425:Beaufort scale
419:
418:
415:
412:
409:
406:
403:
400:
397:
394:
391:
388:
385:
382:
377:
371:
370:
367:
364:
361:
358:
355:
352:
349:
346:
343:
340:
337:
334:
329:
327:Beaufort scale
321:
320:
306:
305:
286:
283:
279:Beaufort scale
275:United Kingdom
271:meteorological
249:
248:
231:
230:
185:
183:
176:
169:
168:
83:
81:
74:
69:
43:
42:
40:
33:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1631:
1620:
1617:
1615:
1612:
1610:
1607:
1605:
1604:Hazard scales
1602:
1601:
1599:
1589:
1586:
1583:
1580:
1577:
1574:
1571:
1568:
1567:
1563:
1557:
1553:
1552:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1537:
1531:
1527:
1525:1-879362-03-1
1521:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1508:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1467:
1464:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1420:
1417:
1412:
1405:
1398:
1395:
1390:
1383:
1380:
1377:
1373:
1370:
1365:
1362:
1349:
1343:
1340:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1316:
1313:
1308:
1307:
1299:
1292:
1289:
1277:
1270:
1267:
1256:on 2011-12-30
1255:
1251:
1247:
1246:Grazulis, Tom
1241:
1238:
1233:
1229:
1222:
1219:
1213:
1209:
1206:
1204:
1201:
1199:
1196:
1194:
1191:
1190:
1186:
1172:
1168:
1165:
1162:
1159:
1156:
1153:
1150:
1147:
1144:
1141:
1138:
1135:
1134:
1127:
1125:
1121:
1116:
1113:
1110:
1107:
1105:
1101:
1098:
1096:
1091:
1088:
1085:
1082:
1080:
1076:
1073:
1071:
1066:
1063:
1060:
1057:
1055:
1051:
1048:
1046:
1041:
1038:
1035:
1032:
1030:
1026:
1023:
1021:
1016:
1013:
1010:
1007:
1005:
1001:
998:
995:
990:
987:
984:
981:
979:
975:
972:
968:
964:
959:
956:
953:
950:
948:
944:
941:
939:
934:
931:
928:
925:
923:
919:
916:
914:
909:
906:
903:
900:
898:
894:
891:
889:
886:
883:
878:
875:
872:
869:
867:
863:
860:
858:
854:Mild damage.
853:
850:
847:
844:
842:
838:
835:
833:
828:
825:
822:
819:
817:
813:
810:
807:
805:
802:
800:
797:
796:
793:
788:
783:
779:
774:
770:
767:
765:
761:
753:
751:
748:
743:
739:
735:
734:Weather radar
731:
727:
723:
719:
713:
710:
706:
700:
697:
692:
689:
678:
675:December 2023
666:
661:
652:
651:
645:
629:
626:
621:
617:
613:
605:
601:
597:
591:
588:
581:
578:
576:
572:
568:
565:
564:
563:
558:
554:
550:
547:
546:
545:
542:
540:
537:
533:
529:
525:
518:
514:
510:
509:
505:
503:
499:
495:
494:
490:
488:
484:
480:
479:
475:
473:
469:
465:
464:
460:
459:
458:
456:
452:
444:
440:
437:
433:
430:
429:
428:
426:
381:
378:
376:
373:
372:
333:
330:
328:
325:
324:
318:
314:
311:
310:
309:
303:
299:
296:
295:
294:
292:
284:
282:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
245:
242:
227:
224:
216:
213:December 2011
206:
202:
196:
195:
189:
184:
175:
174:
165:
162:
154:
151:December 2011
143:
140:
136:
133:
129:
126:
122:
119:
115:
112: –
111:
110:"TORRO scale"
107:
106:Find sources:
100:
96:
90:
89:
84:This article
82:
78:
73:
72:
67:
65:
58:
57:
52:
51:
46:
41:
32:
31:
19:
1555:
1549:
1540:
1534:
1515:
1483:
1479:
1466:
1433:
1429:
1419:
1410:
1397:
1382:
1364:
1352:. Retrieved
1342:
1325:
1315:
1304:
1291:
1280:. Retrieved
1269:
1258:. Retrieved
1254:the original
1240:
1232:the original
1221:
1122:
1118:
1103:
1093:
1078:
1068:
1053:
1043:
1028:
1018:
1003:
996:
992:
977:
969:
965:
961:
946:
936:
921:
911:
896:
887:
884:
880:
865:
855:
840:
830:
815:
808:
803:
798:
791:
786:
781:
777:
772:
763:
759:
757:
714:
701:
693:
688:Fujita scale
685:
672:
664:
570:
569:= 0.837(2) (
561:
552:
543:
531:
523:
521:
512:
506:
497:
491:
482:
476:
467:
461:
448:
435:
422:
379:
374:
331:
326:
316:
312:
307:
301:
297:
288:
258:
254:
252:
237:
219:
210:
191:
157:
148:
138:
131:
124:
117:
105:
93:Please help
88:verification
85:
61:
54:
48:
47:Please help
44:
1328:: 568–575.
782:(Estimated)
764:TORRO scale
760:TORRO scale
718:anemometers
375:TORRO scale
205:introducing
1598:Categories
1387:KERAUNOS.
1334:1318799643
1282:2011-12-31
1260:2011-12-31
1214:References
1089:121 - 134
1064:108 - 120
778:Wind speed
551:= 0.837 (2
528:wind speed
188:references
121:newspapers
50:improve it
1590:(TorDACH)
1458:0899-8418
1086:433 - 482
1083:270 - 299
1061:386 - 432
1058:241 - 269
1039:96 - 107
1036:343 - 385
1033:213 - 240
1011:300 - 342
1008:187 - 212
985:260 - 299
982:161 - 186
954:221 - 259
951:137 - 160
929:185 - 220
926:115 - 136
904:148 - 184
873:116 - 147
747:cycloidal
627:−
511:= 4.596 (
496:= 5.289 (
481:= 8.511 (
466:= 2.365 (
56:talk page
1514:(1993).
1372:Archived
1354:19 April
1330:ProQuest
1248:(1999).
1187:See also
1180:Violent
1114:>135
1014:84 - 95
988:73 - 83
957:62 - 72
932:52 - 61
907:42 - 51
901:93 - 114
876:33 - 41
851:25 - 32
848:87 - 115
826:17 - 24
434:= 0.837
1614:Tornado
1584:(TORRO)
1578:(TORRO)
1572:(TORRO)
1488:Bibcode
1438:Bibcode
1177:Strong
1111:>483
1108:>300
870:73 - 92
845:55 - 72
823:61 - 86
820:39 - 54
730:proxies
722:in-situ
709:Doswell
665:updated
263:tornado
259:T-Scale
201:improve
135:scholar
1522:
1456:
1332:
705:Brooks
522:where
319:/2 - 4
190:, but
137:
130:
123:
116:
108:
1407:(PDF)
1301:(PDF)
1174:Weak
773:Scale
606:2.365
300:= 2 (
142:JSTOR
128:books
1609:Wind
1520:ISBN
1454:ISSN
1356:2014
1169:T11
804:km/h
707:and
573:+4)
555:+8)
530:and
515:+4)
500:+4)
487:km/h
485:+4)
470:+4)
423:The
304:+ 4)
269:, a
257:(or
253:The
114:news
1496:doi
1446:doi
1166:T10
1104:T11
1079:T10
809:m/s
799:mph
740:or
575:m/s
562:or
557:m/s
539:AGL
526:is
502:mph
472:m/s
439:m/s
417:11
414:10
369:12
366:12
363:12
360:12
357:12
354:12
351:12
348:12
345:12
342:12
339:10
97:by
1600::
1554:.
1539:.
1494:.
1484:56
1482:.
1478:.
1452:.
1444:.
1434:38
1432:.
1428:.
1409:.
1324:.
1303:.
1163:T9
1160:T8
1157:T7
1154:T6
1151:T5
1148:T4
1145:T3
1142:T2
1139:T1
1136:T0
1054:T9
1029:T8
1004:T7
978:T6
947:T5
922:T4
897:T3
866:T2
841:T1
816:T0
579:or
541:.
517:kn
411:9
408:8
405:7
402:6
399:5
396:4
393:3
390:2
387:1
384:0
336:8
315:=
281:.
59:.
1556:8
1541:1
1528:.
1502:.
1498::
1490::
1460:.
1448::
1440::
1413:.
1391:.
1358:.
1336:.
1309:.
1285:.
1263:.
745:(
677:)
673:(
667:.
630:4
622:3
618:/
614:2
610:)
602:/
598:v
595:(
592:=
589:T
571:T
567:v
553:T
549:v
536:m
532:T
524:v
513:T
508:v
498:T
493:v
483:T
478:v
468:T
463:v
436:B
432:v
380:T
332:B
317:B
313:T
302:T
298:B
244:)
238:(
226:)
220:(
215:)
211:(
197:.
164:)
158:(
153:)
149:(
139:·
132:·
125:·
118:·
91:.
66:)
62:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
