42:
469:
The old platform lengths are in this section because the section mentions platform extensions to the south of the original platforms. This is particularly relevant to the "Design" section where the platform extensions are mentioned as having a slightly different design from the original platforms.
470:
Without context, the detail of the platform extension looks out of place.As for the control house, you're right that it's not a current station detail. However, given that the history section talks more about events (as opposed to descriptions), I'm not sure that this subsection would fit there.
544:
I'm not sure that this is a GAN requirement. This parameter is still useful as it determines when the source was originally accessed. Besides, InternetArchiveBot doesn't automatically remove the access dates when archiving links - I'd imagine that it would do so if the access date was truly
47:
601:
I have added these. It's worth noting that I cannot add the url-access parameter to the ProQuest source as there is nothing in the url parameter. Technically, the ProQuest link is only an identifier; thus, it is seen as a print source, not as an online source.
126:
309:
I prefer to have the station layout section before the history section - I think describing the station as it currently is should come before how it was - but that's a personal preference and not a requirement. Having the lede match the order is
288:
122:
199:"Station code" appears to be a code used for behind-the-scenes systems like GTFS, rather than in common public use like Amtrak station codes. As such, it's not important enough to be in the infobox, which is for the most important information.
107:
99:
419:'s main building is a landmark, except for a shoe-shine stand). I'm not surprised that a compromise occurred, given how official landmark status severely restricts how a property owner could modify the appearance of their property.
52:
465:
This section should only include current station details. The old platform lengths are not relevant in this section, and the details of the no-longer-extant control house and headhouse should be in the history section.
278:
Currently, the lead follows the order in which the sections are presented in the body (the second paragraph is about history and the third is about the station layout). This is also the case in similar articles such as
445:
Right now, there's a stack of 6 images on the right sides - 3 from history, 3 from layout. Some of these need to be moved or eliminated so that they properly stay with the text and do not squeeze the citations.
115:
17:
576:"Our Subway Open: 150,000 Try It; Mayor McClellan Runs the First Official Train". The New York Times. October 28, 1904. p. 1. Archived from the original on December 13, 2021. Retrieved April 21, 2020.
642:
Not strictly required for GA, but I strongly encourage you to do with all articles especially GA etc: Add alt text for images. It's the #1 thing you can do as an editor to improve accessibility.
92:
574:. So if the "url" parameter of an archived citation becomes a dead link in the future, then a reader can verify that the original URL was live as of that access-date. For example, the citation
284:
280:
415:
Unfortunately, the source doesn't elaborate beyond that. However, there have been several instances in which the LPC has made such compromises (for example, most of the interior of
350:
seems to imply that this was the northern end of cosntruction, but since it opened as far as 145th Street, that wasn't the case. Was 82nd to 104th just a certain contract?
442:
Per discussions at
Wikiproject Trains, an HTML layout is not needed for a simple platform arrangement like this, especially with only a single service with no variation.
80:
292:
70:
490:
Consistently use either "station house" or "control house" (preferably the former) - using both makes it sound like there were two separate buildings.
295:. I'm not disagreeing with this suggestion - just saying that these articles also potentially have a similar issue regarding the layout of the lead.
654:
635:
611:
587:
554:
534:
502:
479:
458:
428:
400:
381:
362:
340:
304:
268:
249:
225:
211:
188:
174:
160:
156:
75:
391:
Yes (there isn't an entrance in the middle of
Broadway anymore), but I've yet to find references for when it was carried out.
522:
Archive link for the MTA neighborhood map (currently cite #50) is broke. I'd suggest replacing it with an archive.org link.
202:
Hmm, you have a good point. Perhaps this parameter should just be disabled for all articles, which have the same problem.
221:
184:
170:
150:
416:
405:
Gotcha. I'd recommend noting that it was carried out (even without a date) rather than leaving it hanging.
560:
325:
650:
631:
607:
583:
550:
530:
498:
475:
454:
424:
396:
377:
358:
336:
300:
275:
Lede is a little on the short side, though acceptable. I would merge the first and third paragraphs.
264:
245:
207:
217:
180:
166:
146:
623:
Further reading doesn't seem very relevant - should either be cited in the prose, or removed
646:
627:
603:
579:
546:
526:
494:
471:
450:
420:
392:
373:
354:
332:
296:
260:
241:
203:
598:
Sources requiring subscription etc (like the
Proquest cite) should be tagged as such
572:
access-date should be used for links to news articles on commercial websites
369:
Were both platforms extended in 1948? If so, "extension" should be plural.
289:
Cathedral
Parkway–110th Street station (IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line)
353:
Indeed, it was that contract, rather than the whole thing. My bad.
578:
was live as of April 21, 2020, but it may be dead in the future.
616:
Ugh, that's annoying. Thanks for adding them the best you could.
216:
I would certainly support removing it from all NYCS articles.
18:
Talk:103rd Street station (IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line)
565:
It is not required for linked documents that do not change.
412:
Some detail on the nature of the compromise would be good.
388:
Was the 1969 contract actually carried out? If so, when?
484:
Okay, those are both fine. I do recommend two changes:
236:
The southbound platform at 103rd Street station in 2021
134:
103:
570:
I see your point. I was focusing more on the sentence
285:
86th Street station (IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line)
281:
79th Street station (IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line)
567:To me, that would include any archived citation.
8:
559:Not required, and I won't insist on it. Per
179:All looks good now, so passing. Nice work!
541:Archived citations do not need accessdate
234:Caption should be longer - something like
30:
293:116th Street–Columbia University station
61:
33:
575:
571:
564:
348:...from 82nd Street to 104th Street...
347:
235:
7:
487:Rename section to "Entrances/exits"
24:
328:splitting off just to the south.
324:Might be worth mentioning the
1:
449:I have fixed both of these.
493:I have done both of these.
673:
655:17:07, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
636:13:08, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
612:13:08, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
588:17:11, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
555:13:08, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
535:13:08, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
503:17:07, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
480:13:00, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
459:13:00, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
429:21:59, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
401:21:59, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
382:21:59, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
363:21:59, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
341:21:59, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
305:12:58, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
269:12:58, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
256:Hatnote no longer needed
250:12:58, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
226:17:56, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
212:12:58, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
189:23:22, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
175:21:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
165:I'll start this shortly.
161:21:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
417:Grand Central Terminal
372:Yes. I've fixed this.
561:Help:Citation Style 1
89:
88:
664:
326:East Side Branch
194:Infobox and lede
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
672:
671:
667:
666:
665:
663:
662:
661:
519:
439:
321:
196:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
670:
668:
660:
659:
658:
657:
640:
639:
638:
621:
620:
619:
618:
617:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
539:
538:
537:
518:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
488:
463:
462:
461:
443:
438:
437:Station layout
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
386:
385:
384:
367:
366:
365:
345:
344:
343:
320:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
273:
272:
271:
254:
253:
252:
232:
231:
230:
229:
228:
195:
192:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
669:
656:
652:
648:
644:
643:
641:
637:
633:
629:
625:
624:
622:
615:
614:
613:
609:
605:
600:
599:
597:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
568:
566:
562:
558:
557:
556:
552:
548:
545:unnecessary.
543:
542:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
523:
521:
520:
516:
504:
500:
496:
492:
491:
489:
486:
485:
483:
482:
481:
477:
473:
468:
467:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
447:
444:
441:
440:
436:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
413:
411:
404:
403:
402:
398:
394:
390:
389:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
370:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
351:
349:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
329:
327:
323:
322:
318:
308:
307:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
277:
276:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
257:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
238:
237:
233:
227:
223:
219:
218:Pi.1415926535
215:
214:
213:
209:
205:
201:
200:
198:
197:
193:
191:
190:
186:
182:
181:Pi.1415926535
177:
176:
172:
168:
167:Pi.1415926535
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
147:Pi.1415926535
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
178:
164:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
104:visual edit
647:Epicgenius
628:Epicgenius
604:Epicgenius
580:Epicgenius
547:Epicgenius
527:Epicgenius
495:Epicgenius
472:Epicgenius
451:Epicgenius
421:Epicgenius
393:Epicgenius
374:Epicgenius
355:Epicgenius
333:Epicgenius
297:Epicgenius
261:Epicgenius
242:Epicgenius
204:Epicgenius
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
626:Removed.
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
157:contribs
76:Criteria
319:History
127:history
108:history
94:Article
645:Done.
525:Done.
331:Done.
291:, and
259:Done.
240:Done.
517:Other
310:fine.
136:Watch
16:<
651:talk
632:talk
608:talk
584:talk
551:talk
531:talk
499:talk
476:talk
455:talk
425:talk
397:talk
378:talk
359:talk
337:talk
301:talk
265:talk
246:talk
222:talk
208:talk
185:talk
171:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
653:)
634:)
610:)
586:)
563::
553:)
533:)
501:)
478:)
457:)
427:)
399:)
380:)
361:)
339:)
303:)
287:,
283:,
267:)
248:)
224:)
210:)
187:)
173:)
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
649:(
630:(
606:(
582:(
549:(
529:(
497:(
474:(
453:(
423:(
395:(
376:(
357:(
335:(
299:(
263:(
244:(
220:(
206:(
183:(
169:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.