42:
259:
thank you for the reminder, i was some time offline due to health issues and thank you for refreshing that. And yes, i support my initial review statement. I know from my own experience, how this kind of hybrid misinformation works. We can't fight it fully. We have our only protection: the policy of
274:
Hi Marqoz, thank you for your assessment, your constructive criticism will help make this article better. I agree with your assessment, I think I definitely could expand upon PRC military pressure and communist influence in Macau before the incident, and this article could use some expansion in the
195:
Having all these in mind the article while having important factual information, needs new sources to cover neutrality issues and some wording correction to express objectivity, to be considered for Good
Article Nomination.
80:
70:
186:
The
Portuguese and American sources are cited only in general contexts in no relevance to these exact events, which are supported solely by Chinese (PRC) sources.
260:
being neutral. All sources should be related in a neutral manner and balanced by the other side. Otherwise cut suspected paragraphs off. And i will insist on it
47:
126:
122:
52:
275:
areas you suggested. I have no objections closing this nomination, before submitting I had not properly vetted all of the sources. JP
75:
107:
99:
156:
241:
Hi, yes I am still willing to be the nominator, I must have missed Marqoz' initial review. Thanks.
346:
324:
289:
277:
243:
203:
115:
17:
332:
307:
221:
216:
has not been active for over a month. Otherwise, this review is likely to be closed. Thanks,
344:
No objections here, article definitely isn't GA material yet. Thanks for the input everyone
297:
265:
150:
208:- are you still willing to be nominator? If so, I can help complete a full review since
327:
has been regularly active since the last ping several weeks ago but hasn't responded.
191:
The article needs more stylistically neutral phrasing and openness for distinct PoVs.
92:
165:
I do strongly vote against Good
Articel nomination for the article and this is why.
328:
303:
254:
236:
217:
175:
PRC military pressure on the colony esp. demonstration of power on the frontiers;
261:
211:
146:
172:
Chinese communists' involvement in instigation of these social disturbances;
350:
336:
311:
281:
269:
247:
225:
160:
294:
are you saying you want to withdraw the nomination? Also pinging
178:
Real power division between Lisbon and
Beijing after the event
169:
The article lacks NEUTRALITY esp. lack of discussion on:
134:
103:
323:I'm going to boldly close this as a fail since
8:
30:
183:The article lacks BALANCED SOURCE BASE:
61:
33:
7:
24:
1:
369:
161:02:48, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
351:13:20, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
337:04:46, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
312:22:32, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
282:20:47, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
270:18:40, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
248:12:41, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
226:04:40, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
200:Following up on this,
302:to this discussion.
18:Talk:12-3 incident
89:
88:
360:
349:
301:
293:
280:
258:
246:
240:
215:
207:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
368:
367:
363:
362:
361:
359:
358:
357:
345:
295:
287:
276:
252:
242:
234:
209:
201:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
366:
364:
356:
355:
354:
353:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
250:
229:
228:
193:
192:
189:
188:
187:
181:
180:
179:
176:
173:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
365:
352:
348:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
334:
330:
326:
313:
309:
305:
299:
291:
285:
284:
283:
279:
273:
272:
271:
267:
263:
256:
251:
249:
245:
238:
233:
232:
231:
230:
227:
223:
219:
213:
205:
199:
198:
197:
190:
185:
184:
182:
177:
174:
171:
170:
168:
167:
166:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
322:
194:
164:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
298:BlueMoonset
104:visual edit
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
157:contribs
76:Criteria
347:Jp16103
329:Kingsif
325:Jp16103
304:Kingsif
290:Jp16103
278:Jp16103
255:Kingsif
244:Jp16103
237:Kingsif
218:Kingsif
204:Jp16103
127:history
108:history
94:Article
262:Marqoz
212:Marqoz
147:Marqoz
136:Watch
16:<
333:talk
308:talk
266:talk
222:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
286:Hi
335:)
310:)
268:)
224:)
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
331:(
306:(
300::
296:@
292::
288:@
264:(
257::
253:@
239::
235:@
220:(
214::
210:@
206::
202:@
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.