71:
53:
156:
135:
166:
22:
574:
463:
No offense, but 4pq1injbok is no Hardy, and PrimeFan is no
Ramanujan. A few months ago I would've agreed with the goal stated at WikiProject Numbers, for every integer from 1 to 1024 to have its own article. But now I think there are a lot of numbers between 100 and 1000 that don't honestly deserve
244:
Their's got to be a maximum number of electrons an atom can possibly have. Element 129 I can buy, but at some point their's got to be a maximum. But even if their is an
Element 129 out their to be discovered, wouldn't it be better to comment out those lines about atomic numbers until the element at
520:
Interestingly, this "social brain hypothesis" predicts that around the time our ancestors evolved the capacity for fifth-order intentionality their community sizes would have exceeded about 120 individuals. Religion may have evolved to provide the mechanism for bonding them into a coherent social
479:
Sure. I'm certainly not arguing for an article for 123 on account of this alone; indeed it rather defeats the purpose. If we can find enough proper properties of 123, then by all means it deserves an article. Still, we're bound to have some least integer without an article, be it 123 or not.
447:
I find 123 interesting. It's a concatenation of the first three positive integers, sometimes called a
Smarandche consecutive number. Sometimes it's used in the expression "easy as 123" (instead of "1-2-3"). But these are all base-dependent. Here's a base-independent one: it is the tenth
289:
Although I am an agnostic, I've noticed that alot of my fellow math enthusiasts are either extremely devout
Christians or Jews. Any number that appears in the bible is extremely important to them, and its probably so for other christians and jews. -- Anonymous User
268:
The USian pronunciation is a clear minority, so I've moved this to have the "and". Perhaps people can tackle the other number articles. I am also concerned about the amount of stuff from the bible that's been put in -- what does it tell us about the number? ---
361:, there is a table of names to use for women who live up to 200 years. However, the name for a 120-year-old-ian is easy to mis-interpret because of how the element "mega" is best interpreted. Other possibilites, both with dis-advantages, are:
500:
In the first instance, it was mentioned by a friend as the maximum size that a community can work at and still be highly cohesive. He'd heard it from a friend of his who works in environmental science. It was suggested that
585:
620:
111:
384:
This is an issue that will become more important as time progresses, what with lengthening lifespans. I for one am stumped on even giving a suggestion.
635:
222:
212:
117:
625:
464:
their own articles. 123 might be one of them, and its being the smallest integer without its own article hardly qualifies it as interesting.
597:
532:
297:
414:
252:
567:
188:
87:
630:
615:
505:
villages where only 120 people, and the person was suggesting that 120 people self-sufficient communities would be a good idea.
179:
140:
78:
58:
33:
548:
I acquired a copy of this paper. It's not generally available on the internet, but i have it somewhere on my site.
187:-related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
436:
301:
536:
410:
556:
439:; but this is really a spurious property, so I'm not quite sure it's a reasonable thing to say. Comments?
256:
593:
497:
In the past week, I've heard two separate references to the number 120 as a threshold size on communities.
406:
358:
39:
375:
70:
52:
589:
513:
528:
402:
337:
293:
248:
21:
86:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
552:
465:
516:) that suggested that religion may have developed as human groups expanded beyond 120 people:
481:
440:
423:
344:
171:
525:
I've not been able to track down any information on this, but my curiosity is piqued.
329:
We probably need a
Knowledge: page to discuss issues on all these pages centrally. --
609:
509:
453:
385:
449:
330:
270:
551:
The paragraph that follows this name, is a precise of the content of the paper.
318:
277:
341:
317:, which is less POV. That may at least tone down some of the religious angle.
161:
155:
134:
573:
581:
184:
502:
83:
601:
560:
388:
378:
15:
580:
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
572:
340:. Let's respect existent conventions and avoid move wars. --
372:
Can anyone try to come up with an easy-to-accept name??
508:
In the second instance, I was reading an article in
309:
It is a fair point. I have removed reference to the
183:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
82:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
116:This article has not yet received a rating on the
8:
526:
400:
291:
246:
129:
47:
245:least gets a temporary name? - PubLibGuy
544:The long hundred and its use in England
131:
49:
19:
435:I've just added a note at 123 re the
7:
493:120 as Threshold Size on Communities
177:This article is within the scope of
76:This article is within the scope of
621:Unknown-importance Numbers articles
365:duo centenarian: properly means 102
276:I agree on both points. Good move.
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
431:123 as least uninteresting number
164:
154:
133:
69:
51:
20:
636:Low-importance Judaism articles
259:) 19:04, 2003 December 23 (UTC)
217:This article has been rated as
539:) 21:45, 2006 February 6 (UTC)
368:super super centenarian: wordy
1:
561:10:34, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
304:) 19:50, 2004 January 7 (UTC)
197:Knowledge:WikiProject Judaism
191:and see a list of open tasks.
96:Knowledge:WikiProject Numbers
90:and see a list of open tasks.
626:WikiProject Numbers articles
602:18:01, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
200:Template:WikiProject Judaism
99:Template:WikiProject Numbers
417:) 07:30, 2004 July 11 (UTC)
353:Name for a 120-year-old-ian
652:
437:interesting number paradox
395:25 is not a divisor of 120
223:project's importance scale
118:project's importance scale
588:if you wish to do so. --
514:"How evolution found God"
349:06:24, 11 Jan 2004 (UTC)
216:
149:
115:
64:
46:
631:B-Class Judaism articles
616:B-Class Numbers articles
584:. Please participate in
568:Redirects for discussion
443:03:28, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
333:23:04, 7 Jan 2004 (UTC)
326:22:57, 7 Jan 2004 (UTC)
285:23:35, 5 Jan 2004 (UTC)
273:23:28, 5 Jan 2004 (UTC)
586:the redirect discussion
484:04:35, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
468:21:18, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC)
456:21:33, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
426:00:02, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
389:19:19, 8 May 2004 (UTC)
379:02:11, 8 May 2004 (UTC)
577:
523:
512:from 28 January 2006 (
28:This article is rated
576:
518:
359:Talk:Supercentenarian
566:"Twelfty" listed at
338:Talk:One hundred ten
313:and left simply the
180:WikiProject Judaism
79:WikiProject Numbers
578:
399:120/25 = not zero
34:content assessment
540:
531:comment added by
418:
405:comment added by
336:Moved back - see
305:
296:comment added by
260:
251:comment added by
240:Maximum electrons
237:
236:
233:
232:
229:
228:
128:
127:
124:
123:
643:
422:Taken care of.
347:
205:
204:
203:Judaism articles
201:
198:
195:
174:
169:
168:
167:
158:
151:
150:
145:
137:
130:
104:
103:
102:Numbers articles
100:
97:
94:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
651:
650:
646:
645:
644:
642:
641:
640:
606:
605:
571:
546:
495:
433:
397:
355:
345:
266:
242:
202:
199:
196:
193:
192:
170:
165:
163:
143:
101:
98:
95:
92:
91:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
649:
647:
639:
638:
633:
628:
623:
618:
608:
607:
570:
564:
545:
542:
533:64.172.210.125
494:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
472:
471:
470:
469:
458:
457:
432:
429:
428:
427:
396:
393:
392:
391:
370:
369:
366:
354:
351:
307:
306:
298:141.217.41.203
265:
262:
241:
238:
235:
234:
231:
230:
227:
226:
219:Low-importance
215:
209:
208:
206:
189:the discussion
176:
175:
172:Judaism portal
159:
147:
146:
144:Low‑importance
138:
126:
125:
122:
121:
114:
108:
107:
105:
88:the discussion
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
648:
637:
634:
632:
629:
627:
624:
622:
619:
617:
614:
613:
611:
604:
603:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
575:
569:
565:
563:
562:
558:
554:
553:Wendy.krieger
549:
543:
541:
538:
534:
530:
522:
517:
515:
511:
510:New Scientist
506:
504:
498:
492:
483:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
467:
466:Anton Mravcek
462:
461:
460:
459:
455:
451:
446:
445:
444:
442:
438:
430:
425:
421:
420:
419:
416:
412:
408:
407:Elijah enwiki
404:
394:
390:
387:
383:
382:
381:
380:
377:
373:
367:
364:
363:
362:
360:
352:
350:
348:
343:
339:
334:
332:
327:
325:
324:
323:
316:
312:
303:
299:
295:
288:
287:
286:
284:
283:
282:
274:
272:
263:
261:
258:
254:
253:207.74.196.20
250:
239:
224:
220:
214:
211:
210:
207:
190:
186:
182:
181:
173:
162:
160:
157:
153:
152:
148:
142:
139:
136:
132:
119:
113:
110:
109:
106:
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
579:
550:
547:
527:— Preceding
524:
519:
507:
499:
496:
450:Lucas number
434:
401:— Preceding
398:
376:66.32.106.43
374:
371:
356:
335:
328:
321:
319:
314:
310:
308:
292:— Preceding
280:
278:
275:
267:
247:— Preceding
243:
218:
178:
77:
40:WikiProjects
590:Soumyabrata
610:Categories
482:4pq1injbok
441:4pq1injbok
424:4pq1injbok
311:Holy Bible
598:subpages
529:unsigned
454:PrimeFan
415:contribs
403:unsigned
386:PrimeFan
294:unsigned
249:unsigned
582:Twelfty
331:Tarquin
322:ÉIREANN
281:ÉIREANN
271:Tarquin
221:on the
194:Judaism
185:Judaism
141:Judaism
93:Numbers
84:Numbers
59:Numbers
30:B-class
503:feudal
36:scale.
521:unit.
315:bible
264:Bible
594:talk
557:talk
537:talk
411:talk
320:Fear
302:talk
279:Fear
257:talk
357:At
342:Jia
213:Low
112:???
612::
600:)
596:•
559:)
452:.
413:•
346:ng
592:(
555:(
535:(
409:(
300:(
255:(
225:.
120:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
