Knowledge

Talk:1982 kidnapping of Iranian diplomats/GA2

Source đź“ť

603:(please read it). We shouldn't say attribute it to "US and Israeli sources" if the citation is combining several US and Israeli sources. Think of it this way, if we allow doing that, I can write some pretty controversial things, cherry-pick two or three US websites that say that, and then attribute the controversial thing to "US sources say..", which is kind of misleading to the reader. The Washington Post article attributes this to the US State Department, and another source is from the 49: 616:
For point 3: the sources are about specific events, e.g. there was an commemoration in 2013, 2014, 2015 .... "The disappearance of the abducted diplomats is commemorated in Iran and Beirut" is a general statement that is synthesized from the previous specific (not general) facts. I suggest either (1)
1123:
What does the source exactly say? It's weird to say that "the interview verifies", usually it's a person or an institution that verifies. Besides, since whether the handing over happened is under dispute, I don't think we should use "verify", because the word assumes that the assertion is true (see
441:
I just found out that the Ronen Bergman book provided details not mentioned in the article, especiallly pp.157-159. The author interviewed Robert Hatem, described as "chief hit man" of the Phallange and claimed to be a witness. Among others, he described the torture of the four Iranians, him
679: 1272:
Regarding the interview, "XX had an interview with YY..." issue, I think mentioning the dates and the Interviewer magazine is important from historical viewpoint. However, I've split up the sentence to be easier to follow. What do you think?
380:
Rather than saying “XX had an interview with YY journalist ZZ and said so-and-so”, just say “XX said so-and-so”, unless the identity of the interviewer is crucial to the statement. This is more concise, to-the-point, and easier to
313:
Reduce unnecessary quotation marks, especially when you’re just using a term in a neutral manner, e.g. "turning point", "an Israel-based prisoners' aid organization", “disappeared”, "a spokesman for the Israeli Prime
1004:
Some sentences were moved to their appropriate sections. I checked the source for the sentence "It was believed... ." It was not determined who believed that and I found it best to attribute the whole sentence to the
54: 442:
witnessing the shooting of one of four and his claim that he shot Motevaselian himself. I believe incorporating these accounts to the article would go a long way to balance the strong reliance on Iranian sources.
258:“Indeed, he had been chosen to lead … because of his success in crushing the 1979 Kurdish rebellion in Iran”: seems this is attributed to a statement from former IRGC chief Mohsen Rezai, not just US/Israeli source 273:
The fact that they are abducted by Phalange militia in al-Barbareh checkpoints seem to be supported by Western source (WashPo) too. Maybe cite it too to make the article less dependent on Iranian sources
340:“ It was believed that they were then buried at a site where construction later obliterated their graves”: shouldn’t this info be in the “Possible death” section instead? Also, state who believed this 245:
Background: Add another paragraph about the perpetrator (Phalange), its relation with Israel (this is discussed in the sources including Washington Post and help explain why Israel got accused).
566:'Commemoration section': I don't know what to do with this section because per sources (which I presented earlier here) the commemoration have been done almost every year during recent years. 133: 194:
Thanks for the review. I'll be answering your questions and dealing with your possible suggestions. Btw, I think it would be much beneficial to take a look at the former review. Regards. --
1292:
I tried to add two lines to the background regarding the Lebanon civil war, but there is not indication that Iran was an ally in the civil war. Adding more materials requires committing
129: 59: 114: 763:
I think so, unless it "US and Israeli sources" is the wording of an RS. Otherwise, combining multiple source and generalizing them as "US and Israeli sources" might constitute
1153:. However, we can alter the wording per your suggestion. I don't think we had asserted on anything because the whole sentence is attributed to the IRIB, i.e. IRIB says that!-- 1215:
Regarding the commemoration I did not find sources saying that the incident is commemorated every year, but it's evident by looking at various sources. For example, see the
106: 783:
I don't think it's a good idea to add the sources' names to the article body. How about using "some US and Israeli sources" and determine the sources via a footnote? --
611:, ..." ? I believe the weight of these two organization is enough to make readers take it serously, rather than hiding behind the attribution "US and Israeli sources". 87: 222:
You have included the Motevaselian’s possible IRGC angle. I agree with you that saying “under diplomatic cover” without backing from source would be bordering OR
229:
thread that RSes like NY Times already use RaY as source, and the passage that reference the RaY article is explicitly attribute to RaY. I believe this is OK.
1093:, I can't say yes and that's why I have attributed that to the IRIB. The author of the source have reflected his understanding of the Hobeika's interview. -- 77: 627:
I've now addressed both of your concerns. Regarding the commemoration, I could find a source explicitly saying that the commemoration is held every year. --
617:
sticking to listing the specific events or (2) finding a source which specifically says that it's regularly commmemorated. 04:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
853: 17: 359:“ Commemoration”: Does the source say that the event is regularly commemorated? Or does it just say that there was once a celebration in Iran/Beirut? 263:“Kidnapping”: explain what they were doing before ending up in the checkpoint, e.g. “On , the party was travelling from Damascus to destination xxx” 215:
I’ve read the previous GA review. The reviewer raised important points and I believe the article as it stands now have sufficiently addressed these:
298:“Israel agreed to give a report on the fate of the four Iranians “: So was this report given and what did it say? This paragraph leaves it hanging. 345:“the case had turned into a political issue rather than a judicial one”: can you explain further how it turned into a political issue in lebanon? 122: 470:: I was astonished by your claim, "the strong reliance on Iranian sources"! Would you mind checking the sources once again? However, I added ( 705:
Can we Ignore talking about how the opposite sides of the Lebanese civil war were formed since it's marginally related to this subject? --
928:
Can you find out more? It's kind of a cliffhanger to read that Israel agreed to give a report in 2006, but we have no idea what it says.
268:“The abducted individuals were reportedly imprisoned “: state whose account this is, because the fate of the prisoners seem controversial 729: 725: 608: 604: 278:“Israeli detention speculation” vs “Possible death”. Maybe make the title match, e.g. “Possible Israeli detention” vs “Possible death” 1150: 1216: 806:"Indeed, he had been chosen to lead … " was attributed to 'According to Mohsen Rezaee'. Thanks for being so accurate and precise. -- 99: 895:"He" was replaced by "Abu Hesham", as you suggested. "Political response" was changed into a level II subtitle. The acronyms were 917: 82: 950: 1001:
The concern with the quotation was addressed. The remaining quotes are necessary in my viewpoint. What do you think on this?
682:
for this relation, however, most of the sources dealing with this issue are not necessarily on the abductions and hence
163: 250:
Also possibly explain how Phalange+Israel and Iran+iits allies are involved in the opposite sides of Lebanese civil war
737: 724:
Those US and Israeli sources are immediately cited after the sentence. Do we need to repeat them one by one? They are
1228: 1302:
instructions is implemented and there's no such thing as "verified" and "claimed" or something like them. --
849: 504:
Looking much better now. In addition to unstruck comments above, and replies below, please also address the
1321:"Reportedly" was changed into the "According to Lebanese judiciary sources" to show whose account it is. -- 1379: 1355: 1335: 1316: 1287: 1263: 1245: 1200: 1181: 1167: 1137: 1107: 1075: 1047: 1025: 996: 967: 937: 874: 843: 820: 797: 776: 754: 719: 700: 673: 641: 585: 533: 490: 459: 416: 394: 208: 181: 167: 23: 1365:, thanks for the very precise review! I'm glad to see it passed and enjoyed working with you. Regards. -- 547:
Thanks for your efforts, suggestions and edits. I think there are only three unstruck comments remaining:
283:“He died in what Rai al-Youm claimed”: name the “he” because you named multiple men in the preceding text 848:
The diplomats transferring to the Karantina is not controversial. Other sources have verified that (see
402:
I wonder why I did not notice your recent change to this page. I will address the above points ASAP. --
905: 508: 431:"According to IRIB, Elie Hobeika's interview.. " This sentence is too long. Please shorten or split. 913: 303:
When first naming “Fars News Agency”, state that it is Iranian or Iran-based. Same for Press TV
1220: 953:
talks about a report by Israel published in 2009. Do you think this is the promised report? --
1351: 1259: 1177: 1133: 933: 772: 764: 600: 529: 518: 455: 390: 177: 157: 308:
Describe Ray al-Youm as “pan-Arabic daily” or something similar, as per NYTimes description
1172:
Please do alter the wording. Is there perhaps a better translation to what the IRIB says.
733: 288:
I believe “Political response” should be its own section instead of a subsection of “Fate”
678:
I tried to add a line or two regarding the Israel-Phalange relations. There are concrete
1366: 1322: 1303: 1274: 1232: 1187: 1154: 1118: 1094: 1062: 1034: 1012: 983: 954: 909: 861: 830: 807: 784: 741: 706: 687: 660: 628: 594: 572: 477: 403: 350:“ In a statement, Iran expressed appreciation” mention year (or date) of this statement 195: 1299: 1125: 1030: 364: 226: 1293: 683: 1346:
I'm passing the GA now. Thank you for your work and sorry for the numerous delay.
331:
There's still some more unnecessary quotation marks. I'll try to reduce them too.
1362: 1347: 1255: 1173: 1144: 1129: 1084: 1056: 946: 929: 768: 622: 542: 525: 467: 451: 386: 189: 173: 153: 355:
Similarly for “Mohammad Fathali, Iranian Ambassador to Beirut, said that Iran”
599:
I consider the second point addressed. For point 1, the relevant policy is
979: 902:
I found no material on whether the Israeli report was published or not.
879:
Two other citations were added to the al-Barabarah checkpoint portion. (
254:“According to US and Israeli sources”: which sources, can we name them? 1224: 978:
The origination of both Fars News and Press TV are now mentioned.
1254:
Maybe say, "commemorated in Iran, including in 2013, 2014, ..."?
1186:
I changed the word "verified" to "indicate". Does it suffice? --
607:
maybe we can say, "according to the US State Department and the
240:
Lead section: include the Motevaselian’s IRGC angle there too
1008:
It was explained why it has turned into a political issue.
559:"state whose account this is, because the fate...". I've 436:
Also provide the full form of IRIB in the first mention.
1090: 896: 889: 883: 880: 857: 826: 656: 560: 553: 474: 471: 293:
expand acronyms like IRNA, IRGC at their first mentions
141: 110: 552:
Naming "US and Israeli sources" which I dealt with in
225:
Regarding the use of Rai al-Youm. You’ve shown in the
1011:The date of the two statements was mentioned. -- 982:daily description was added to Ray al-Youm. -- 829:what they were doing before the kidnapping. -- 8: 892:to address the concern regarding the titles. 446:Please also see my unstruck comments above. 903: 37: 24:Talk:1982 Iranian diplomats kidnapping/GA2 1033:and the interview issue were resolved. -- 369:Said, stated, described, wrote, commented 235:Other than these, I have other feedback: 18:Talk:1982 kidnapping of Iranian diplomats 1061:I tried to act based on your review. -- 68: 40: 7: 730:School of Advanced Military Studies 726:Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 609:Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 605:Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 476:) the accounts by Ronen Bergman. -- 31: 375:rather than “claimed”, “verified” 655:" Motevaselian’s IRGC angle" is 571:I'm waiting to hear from you. -- 1: 556:suggesting to use 'footnote'. 1380:18:27, 5 November 2017 (UTC) 1356:04:05, 5 November 2017 (UTC) 1264:05:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC) 642:07:28, 3 November 2017 (UTC) 586:13:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC) 534:05:23, 13 October 2017 (UTC) 1151:a clue can verify something 738:Penn State University Press 1396: 1336:19:08, 6 August 2017 (UTC) 1317:12:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC) 1288:18:46, 5 August 2017 (UTC) 1246:07:52, 2 August 2017 (UTC) 1201:07:25, 1 August 2017 (UTC) 1149:Not that weird, sometimes 968:07:25, 1 August 2017 (UTC) 798:07:25, 1 August 2017 (UTC) 491:12:31, 3 August 2017 (UTC) 1182:04:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC) 1168:13:24, 19 July 2017 (UTC) 1138:06:58, 19 July 2017 (UTC) 1108:06:12, 19 July 2017 (UTC) 938:04:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC) 777:04:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC) 460:04:40, 21 July 2017 (UTC) 395:14:16, 24 June 2017 (UTC) 209:12:04, 24 June 2017 (UTC) 182:08:04, 24 June 2017 (UTC) 168:08:04, 24 June 2017 (UTC) 1076:12:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC) 1048:12:04, 9 July 2017 (UTC) 1026:11:32, 9 July 2017 (UTC) 997:14:44, 5 July 2017 (UTC) 888:The other sub-title was 875:04:47, 5 July 2017 (UTC) 856:). Another citation was 844:15:48, 4 July 2017 (UTC) 821:15:20, 4 July 2017 (UTC) 755:15:10, 4 July 2017 (UTC) 720:15:10, 4 July 2017 (UTC) 701:07:47, 4 July 2017 (UTC) 674:07:47, 4 July 2017 (UTC) 650:Response to the reviewer 417:05:44, 3 July 2017 (UTC) 367:. Prefer to use neutral 524:tags in the article. 686:is prohibiting. -- 921: 908:comment added by 172:Looking at this. 96: 95: 22:(Redirected from 1387: 1377: 1376: 1373: 1370: 1333: 1332: 1329: 1326: 1314: 1313: 1310: 1307: 1285: 1284: 1281: 1278: 1243: 1242: 1239: 1236: 1198: 1197: 1194: 1191: 1165: 1164: 1161: 1158: 1148: 1122: 1105: 1104: 1101: 1098: 1088: 1073: 1072: 1069: 1066: 1060: 1045: 1044: 1041: 1038: 1023: 1022: 1019: 1016: 994: 993: 990: 987: 965: 964: 961: 958: 872: 871: 868: 865: 841: 840: 837: 834: 818: 817: 814: 811: 795: 794: 791: 788: 752: 751: 748: 745: 717: 716: 713: 710: 698: 697: 694: 691: 671: 670: 667: 664: 639: 638: 635: 632: 626: 598: 583: 582: 579: 576: 563:to this comment. 546: 523: 517: 513: 507: 488: 487: 484: 481: 414: 413: 410: 407: 206: 205: 202: 199: 193: 146: 137: 118: 50:Copyvio detector 38: 27: 1395: 1394: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1374: 1371: 1368: 1367: 1344: 1330: 1327: 1324: 1323: 1311: 1308: 1305: 1304: 1282: 1279: 1276: 1275: 1240: 1237: 1234: 1233: 1195: 1192: 1189: 1188: 1162: 1159: 1156: 1155: 1142: 1116: 1102: 1099: 1096: 1095: 1089:Regarding this 1082: 1070: 1067: 1064: 1063: 1054: 1042: 1039: 1036: 1035: 1020: 1017: 1014: 1013: 991: 988: 985: 984: 962: 959: 956: 955: 869: 866: 863: 862: 838: 835: 832: 831: 815: 812: 809: 808: 792: 789: 786: 785: 749: 746: 743: 742: 734:Washington Post 714: 711: 708: 707: 695: 692: 689: 688: 668: 665: 662: 661: 659:in the lead. -- 652: 636: 633: 630: 629: 620: 592: 580: 577: 574: 573: 540: 521: 515: 511: 505: 501: 485: 482: 479: 478: 427: 411: 408: 405: 404: 203: 200: 197: 196: 187: 127: 104: 98: 92: 64: 36: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1393: 1391: 1383: 1382: 1343: 1342:Passing the GA 1340: 1339: 1338: 1319: 1297: 1290: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1249: 1248: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1111: 1110: 1079: 1078: 1051: 1050: 1028: 1009: 1006: 1002: 999: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 970: 941: 940: 923: 922: 900: 893: 886: 877: 846: 823: 803: 802: 801: 800: 780: 779: 758: 757: 722: 703: 676: 651: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 613: 612: 589: 588: 568: 567: 564: 557: 549: 548: 537: 536: 500: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 448: 447: 444: 438: 433: 426: 423: 422: 421: 420: 419: 384: 383: 377: 360: 357: 352: 347: 342: 336: 335: 334: 333: 317: 316: 310: 305: 300: 295: 290: 285: 280: 275: 270: 265: 260: 255: 252: 247: 242: 233: 232: 231: 230: 223: 217: 216: 212: 211: 147: 94: 93: 91: 90: 85: 80: 74: 71: 70: 66: 65: 63: 62: 60:External links 57: 52: 46: 43: 42: 35: 32: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1392: 1381: 1378: 1364: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1341: 1337: 1334: 1320: 1318: 1315: 1301: 1298: 1295: 1291: 1289: 1286: 1271: 1270: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1247: 1244: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1213: 1202: 1199: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1166: 1152: 1146: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1120: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1109: 1106: 1092: 1086: 1081: 1080: 1077: 1074: 1058: 1053: 1052: 1049: 1046: 1032: 1029: 1027: 1024: 1010: 1007: 1003: 1000: 998: 995: 981: 977: 976: 969: 966: 952: 948: 945: 944: 943: 942: 939: 935: 931: 927: 926: 925: 924: 919: 915: 911: 907: 901: 898: 894: 891: 887: 884: 881: 878: 876: 873: 859: 855: 851: 847: 845: 842: 828: 824: 822: 819: 805: 804: 799: 796: 782: 781: 778: 774: 770: 766: 762: 761: 760: 759: 756: 753: 739: 735: 731: 727: 723: 721: 718: 704: 702: 699: 685: 681: 677: 675: 672: 658: 654: 653: 649: 643: 640: 624: 619: 618: 615: 614: 610: 606: 602: 596: 591: 590: 587: 584: 570: 569: 565: 562: 558: 555: 551: 550: 544: 539: 538: 535: 531: 527: 520: 510: 503: 502: 498: 492: 489: 475: 472: 469: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 457: 453: 445: 443: 439: 437: 434: 432: 429: 428: 424: 418: 415: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 392: 388: 382: 378: 376: 374: 370: 366: 361: 358: 356: 353: 351: 348: 346: 343: 341: 338: 337: 332: 329: 328: 326: 325: 323: 322: 320: 319: 315: 311: 309: 306: 304: 301: 299: 296: 294: 291: 289: 286: 284: 281: 279: 276: 274: 271: 269: 266: 264: 261: 259: 256: 253: 251: 248: 246: 243: 241: 238: 237: 236: 228: 224: 221: 220: 219: 218: 214: 213: 210: 207: 191: 186: 185: 184: 183: 179: 175: 170: 169: 165: 162: 159: 155: 152: 148: 145: 144: 140: 135: 131: 126: 125: 121: 116: 112: 108: 103: 102: 89: 86: 84: 81: 79: 76: 75: 73: 72: 67: 61: 58: 56: 53: 51: 48: 47: 45: 44: 39: 33: 25: 19: 1345: 904:— Preceding 554:this comment 449: 440: 435: 430: 385: 379: 373:according to 372: 368: 362: 354: 349: 344: 339: 330: 327: 324: 321: 318: 312: 307: 302: 297: 292: 287: 282: 277: 272: 267: 262: 257: 249: 244: 239: 234: 171: 160: 150: 149: 142: 138: 124:Article talk 123: 119: 100: 97: 88:Instructions 951:This source 509:page needed 425:Second pass 111:visual edit 499:Third pass 314:Minister." 55:Authorship 41:GA toolbox 1119:Mhhossein 910:Mhhossein 860:, too. -- 827:explained 765:WP:WEASEL 680:evidences 601:WP:WEASEL 595:Mhhossein 561:responded 151:Reviewer: 78:Templates 69:Reviewing 34:GA Review 980:Pan-Arab 918:contribs 906:unsigned 897:expanded 657:included 514:and the 164:contribs 83:Criteria 1375:hossein 1331:hossein 1312:hossein 1283:hossein 1241:hossein 1196:hossein 1163:hossein 1103:hossein 1071:hossein 1043:hossein 1021:hossein 1005:source. 992:hossein 963:hossein 890:altered 870:hossein 839:hossein 816:hossein 793:hossein 750:hossein 715:hossein 696:hossein 669:hossein 637:hossein 581:hossein 519:clarify 486:hossein 412:hossein 381:follow. 204:hossein 134:history 115:history 101:Article 1363:HaEr48 1348:HaEr48 1300:WP:SAY 1256:HaEr48 1174:HaEr48 1145:HaEr48 1130:HaEr48 1126:WP:SAY 1085:HaEr48 1057:HaEr48 1031:WP:SAY 947:HaEr48 930:HaEr48 882:& 769:HaEr48 623:HaEr48 543:HaEr48 526:HaEr48 468:HaEr48 452:HaEr48 387:HaEr48 371:, and 365:WP:SAY 227:WP:RSN 190:HaEr48 174:HaEr48 154:HaEr48 1294:WP:OR 858:added 825:It's 684:WP:OR 143:Watch 16:< 1361:Hey 1352:talk 1260:talk 1231:. -- 1229:33rd 1225:32nd 1221:31st 1217:30th 1178:talk 1134:talk 1091:edit 934:talk 914:talk 854:this 852:and 850:this 773:talk 736:and 530:talk 456:talk 391:talk 363:See 178:talk 158:talk 130:edit 107:edit 1128:). 740:.-- 450:-- 1354:) 1273:-- 1262:) 1227:, 1223:, 1219:, 1180:) 1136:) 949:: 936:) 920:) 916:• 885:). 775:) 767:. 732:, 728:, 532:) 522:}} 516:{{ 512:}} 506:{{ 473:, 458:) 393:) 180:) 166:) 132:| 113:| 109:| 1372:h 1369:M 1350:( 1328:h 1325:M 1309:h 1306:M 1296:. 1280:h 1277:M 1258:( 1238:h 1235:M 1193:h 1190:M 1176:( 1160:h 1157:M 1147:: 1143:@ 1132:( 1121:: 1117:@ 1100:h 1097:M 1087:: 1083:@ 1068:h 1065:M 1059:: 1055:@ 1040:h 1037:M 1018:h 1015:M 989:h 986:M 960:h 957:M 932:( 912:( 899:. 867:h 864:M 836:h 833:M 813:h 810:M 790:h 787:M 771:( 747:h 744:M 712:h 709:M 693:h 690:M 666:h 663:M 634:h 631:M 625:: 621:@ 597:: 593:@ 578:h 575:M 545:: 541:@ 528:( 483:h 480:M 454:( 409:h 406:M 389:( 201:h 198:M 192:: 188:@ 176:( 161:· 156:( 139:· 136:) 128:( 120:· 117:) 105:( 26:)

Index

Talk:1982 kidnapping of Iranian diplomats
Talk:1982 Iranian diplomats kidnapping/GA2
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
HaEr48
talk
contribs
08:04, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
HaEr48
talk
08:04, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
HaEr48
Mhhossein
12:04, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
WP:RSN
WP:SAY
HaEr48
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑