Knowledge

Talk:1 Wall Street/GA1

Source 📝

175:, while the article itself remains originally written, with no apparent plagiarism. The article itself remains broad within its coverage, but does not expound upon information which is exclusively relevant for those who possess a vested interest in the building; pending minor alterations, it shall remain completely focused upon its topic. The article is written from the neutral point of view; no apparent conflicts of interest appear to have manifested themselves. The citations fully follow the generally accepted format for citing sources in a Knowledge article; no style discrepancies exist. No recent edit wars have occurred within the edit history of the article; all editors have respected the 3 Revert Rule. Due to the fact that the article satisfies the criteria listed within WP:GACR, I hereby pass the article; following further expansion and review, it appears to be on its way to nomination as a featured article. 167:
well-written, with clear sectional divisions, full citations and complete explanation with an absence of generalised errors or inconsistencies with regards to grammar; the prose is informational within a manner which allows the reader to attain any necessary information from the article immediately. The citation list is complete and particularly exhaustive; the large majority of the citations originate from reputable sources, such as the
42: 203:"The Wall Street entrance leads into the Red Room, a large space with a ceiling stretching 33 feet (10 m) high" - This is a bit nitpicky, but while the ceiling height is in the source, and the source states that the room is at street level, I'm not seeing in the source where it is stated that the Wall Street entrance enters the room 166:
Regarding the listed article, pending further reviews for the elimination of any potential errors, which there do not seem to be from a cursory glance, I believe that the article fully qualifies for selection as a Good Article; it satisfies the criteria provided per WP:GACR. The article is
263:
a bit hard to figure out at first, but this is a fact also confirmed by property records and official transit maps (barring the fact that we can't use visual observation as a source). I fixed the third one. I think the fifth one is just a caps difference.
197:"Entrances to the New York City Subway's Wall Street station, served by the 4 and ​5 trains, are located in and adjacent to the building" - Looks good enough. It took me awhile to figure out the map, but it looks acceptable. 80: 47: 70: 126: 122: 52: 156: 107: 285:
I feel confident from the spot checks and looking at the sources for reliability that this article meets the referencing criteria.
75: 99: 216:
had referencing issues. If these five come up clean, I'm happy to AGF the rest of it. I hope that's fine with you.
237:- A few minor issues. I'll check a few more later, although I don't think there's any big problems hiding here. 180: 150: 269: 213: 290: 242: 221: 115: 17: 206:"or "Chimney Corner"" - Supported, although I will note that the source gives "chimney corner" 176: 146: 265: 232: 194:
Will check a few random sentences. Depending on the results of this, I may check more.
286: 254: 238: 217: 92: 212:
Will start with just these five. I've reviewed many of your nominations, and only
209:"Deutsche Bank provided $ 750 million in debt for the conversion." - Supported 294: 273: 246: 225: 184: 160: 282:"There is 1,165,645 sq ft (108,292 m2) of interior space" - Supported. 279:"except for the retail entrance, which is made of glass" - Supported. 259:
Thank you for the commentary. For the first one, the map
134: 103: 200:"with a height of about 494 feet (151 m)" - Supported 8: 30: 61: 33: 7: 190:Spot checks of sources, per request 24: 1: 295:22:45, 11 August 2020 (UTC) 274:19:09, 11 August 2020 (UTC) 247:18:36, 11 August 2020 (UTC) 226:18:24, 11 August 2020 (UTC) 310: 185:00:03, 8 August 2020 (UTC) 161:00:03, 8 August 2020 (UTC) 173:New York Herald Tribune 214:Talk:Bryant Park/GA1 18:Talk:1 Wall Street 89: 88: 301: 258: 236: 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 309: 308: 304: 303: 302: 300: 299: 298: 293: 252: 245: 230: 224: 192: 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 307: 305: 289: 277: 276: 241: 220: 191: 188: 169:New York Times 165: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 306: 297: 296: 292: 288: 283: 280: 275: 271: 267: 262: 256: 251: 250: 249: 248: 244: 240: 234: 228: 227: 223: 219: 215: 210: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 189: 187: 186: 182: 178: 174: 170: 163: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 284: 281: 278: 260: 229: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 172: 168: 164: 153: 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 177:SurenGrig07 147:SurenGrig07 104:visual edit 266:epicgenius 233:Epicgenius 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 287:Hog Farm 255:Hog Farm 239:Hog Farm 218:Hog Farm 171:and the 157:contribs 76:Criteria 127:history 108:history 94:Article 291:Bacon 243:Bacon 222:Bacon 136:Watch 16:< 270:talk 181:talk 151:talk 123:edit 100:edit 272:) 261:is 183:) 159:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 268:( 257:: 253:@ 235:: 231:@ 179:( 154:· 149:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:1 Wall Street
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
SurenGrig07
talk
contribs
00:03, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
SurenGrig07
talk
00:03, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Bryant Park/GA1
Hog Farm
Bacon
18:24, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Epicgenius
Hog Farm
Bacon
18:36, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.