235:
214:
146:
125:
334:
476:
819:
414:
791:
783:
754:
734:
723:
694:
683:
94:
21:
324:
303:
917:
I have done this on a number of "game" articles, including some GAs. I always put the home team on the bottom. Stacking them makes them legible. I only do this for articles without a clear image for the infobox. Is there some policy you are pushing or some strong reason you feel it needs to be this
1044:
I'll explain why: it makes more sense to me to have pictures of the stadium in the infobox because it could show the reader visually where the game in question was being played. So, I guess the question is this: how do you propose we resolve our dispute so there's
549:
468:
1150:
There probably needs to be a bigger discussion on some of these games, as what was originally a famous play has become eponymous with the game itself. I.e. what is actually notable is a game that became famous for something that happened during that
936:
Yes. I do not believe that team logos belong in the infobox of notable NFL game articles. I believe that the NFL team wordmark logos belong only in NFL rivalry articles to visually describe and represent the specific team's name branding.
997:. I find it redundant to include team logos in game articles on this encyclopedia. I don't know why you oppose using images of the stadiums where the game was played in the infobox of each article, or, in the case of
196:
1193:
186:
1144:
610:
1198:
162:
1117:
the game (rather than a reference to the game or a quote from the game) doesn't sound right. It would make some sense and sound more natural if it was a simple nickname like the
285:
864:
843:
573:
1208:
275:
1188:
72:
153:
130:
1213:
251:
1183:
392:
1203:
452:
1228:
1223:
1139:
It is confusing. It really is the "We want the ball and we're going to score! game" but "game" is not included in the styling in sources. Unlike say the
382:
242:
219:
464:
358:
972:, I have undone them all. If all you are espousing is a preference for some other way, you know what to do. Establish consensus, I recommend at
32:
1015:
And I dont understand why you want random pictures of stadiums in the infobox. Its a content dispute. If it matters that much, than follow
1218:
830:
The hook is a little long at 197 characters, still within the limit, but I think there's the possibility of shortening it. Do you like:
347:
308:
58:
1143:
which sources include "game" in. There was a past discussion on this that fizzled out, but I was open to just moving the article to
1163:
1130:
1087:
1058:
1039:
1010:
988:
946:
930:
902:
881:
740:
658:
642:
533:
1067:. I obviously feel that the logos provide the reader more beneficial visual cues because it allows for a quick understanding of
748:
105:
1178:
1054:
1006:
942:
1121:. Which sources use "We want the ball..." as the name or nickname of the game itself, rather than as a quotation from it? --
510:
717:
62:
1050:
1002:
965:
938:
914:
530:
777:
688:
677:
158:
111:
1156:
1080:
1032:
981:
923:
895:
635:
621:
42:
1109:"We want the ball and we're going to score!" was a National Football League (NFL) Wild Card Playoff game...
744:
586:
1046:
877:
654:
429:
357:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
250:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
161:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
527:
994:
93:
1140:
825:
617:
962:
413:
1126:
582:
247:
728:
597:
887:
873:
856:
835:
650:
565:
444:
339:
1064:
1020:
1016:
973:
969:
860:
839:
569:
448:
872:
that was returned for a touchdown that lost the game? If not, the original hook is fine.
57:
contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the
234:
213:
1172:
976:. I am legit shocked that this is your course of action for an editor of your tenure.
495:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
145:
124:
1136:
1122:
869:
848:
578:
457:
434:
818:
501:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
469:
Template:Did you know nominations/"We want the ball and we're going to score!"
329:
1024:
998:
424:
353:
1118:
351:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of
513:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
323:
302:
408:
87:
15:
710:
Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
474:
1147:, which would make the opening sentence easier to write.
246:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
157:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
968:
while an active discussion and dispute is ongoing. Per
959:
957:
955:
953:
951:
554:
545:
67:
467:. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
763:
703:
663:
171:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject
National Football League
1145:
2003 NFC Wild Card playoff game (Seattle–Green Bay)
770:Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
421:
2003 NFC Wild Card playoff game (Seattle–Green Bay)
29:
2003 NFC Wild Card playoff game (Seattle–Green Bay)
1071:played, which is typically way more relevant than
1194:Mid-importance National Football League articles
1199:WikiProject National Football League articles
260:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Green Bay Packers
174:Template:WikiProject National Football League
8:
515:No further edits should be made to this page
1209:High-importance Green Bay Packers articles
1063:I would propose you start a discussion at
961:these edits are shockingly disruptive and
465:Knowledge (XXG):Recent additions/2024/July
297:
208:
119:
1189:B-Class National Football League articles
437:). The text of the entry was as follows:
61:to decide whether or not to list it as a
890:I am fine with any of the alts provided.
1027:wasnt reverted. That makes sense to me.
475:
299:
210:
121:
91:
1214:WikiProject Green Bay Packers articles
670:Article is new enough and long enough
263:Template:WikiProject Green Bay Packers
1229:Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles
1184:Good article nominees awaiting review
581:that was returned for a touchdown by
463:A record of the entry may be seen at
367:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Wisconsin
71:and save the page. (See here for the
65:. To start the review process, click
7:
1001:, an image of the play in question.
628:. Nominator has 47 past nominations.
345:This article is within the scope of
240:This article is within the scope of
154:WikiProject National Football League
151:This article is within the scope of
110:It is of interest to the following
79:Short description: Notable NFL game
1204:B-Class Green Bay Packers articles
14:
1224:Low-importance Wisconsin articles
511:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
177:National Football League articles
817:
789:
781:
752:
732:
721:
692:
681:
412:
332:
322:
301:
233:
212:
144:
123:
92:
19:
498:Please do not modify this page.
387:This article has been rated as
280:This article has been rated as
191:This article has been rated as
423:appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s
370:Template:WikiProject Wisconsin
1:
616:Converted from a redirect by
361:and see a list of open tasks.
254:and see a list of open tasks.
243:WikiProject Green Bay Packers
165:and see a list of open tasks.
624:). Number of QPQs required:
49:at 16:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
1164:16:13, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
1131:16:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
1088:00:59, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
1059:00:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
1040:00:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
1011:00:35, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
989:00:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
947:23:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
931:15:24, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
800:
503:this nomination's talk page
1245:
1219:B-Class Wisconsin articles
598:Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
393:project's importance scale
286:project's importance scale
266:Green Bay Packers articles
197:project's importance scale
903:01:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
882:23:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
659:21:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
643:14:45, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
534:01:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
386:
317:
279:
228:
190:
139:
118:
73:good article instructions
993:I don't believe this is
168:National Football League
131:National Football League
31:is currently a Football
851:that lost the game? or
822:Looks good. Nice work.
507:the article's talk page
488:Did you know nomination
433:column on 7 July 2024 (
480:
100:This article is rated
1179:Good article nominees
611:Supernovae in fiction
478:
348:WikiProject Wisconsin
104:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
59:good article criteria
1051:Charlesaaronthompson
1003:Charlesaaronthompson
966:Charlesaaronthompson
939:Charlesaaronthompson
915:Charlesaaronthompson
741:copyright violations
33:good article nominee
1141:Instant Replay Game
589:that lost the game?
460:that lost the game?
865:guaranteed victory
844:guaranteed victory
749:close paraphrasing
649:Will review this.
574:guaranteed victory
481:
373:Wisconsin articles
106:content assessment
1159:
1083:
1035:
1023:. And youll note
984:
926:
898:
811:
810:
799:
798:
762:
761:
718:Adequate sourcing
702:
701:
638:
583:Green Bay Packers
485:
484:
407:
406:
403:
402:
399:
398:
296:
295:
292:
291:
257:Green Bay Packers
248:Green Bay Packers
220:Green Bay Packers
207:
206:
203:
202:
86:
85:
80:
50:
45:
1236:
1162:
1157:
1155:
1104:Opening sentence
1086:
1081:
1079:
1038:
1033:
1031:
987:
982:
980:
929:
924:
922:
901:
896:
894:
857:Seattle Seahawks
836:Seattle Seahawks
829:
821:
801:
793:
792:
785:
784:
764:
756:
755:
736:
735:
725:
724:
704:
696:
695:
685:
684:
664:
641:
636:
634:
566:Seattle Seahawks
522:The result was:
500:
477:
453:promised victory
445:Seattle Seahawks
416:
409:
375:
374:
371:
368:
365:
342:
340:Wisconsin portal
337:
336:
335:
326:
319:
318:
313:
305:
298:
268:
267:
264:
261:
258:
237:
230:
229:
224:
216:
209:
179:
178:
175:
172:
169:
148:
141:
140:
135:
127:
120:
103:
97:
96:
88:
78:
70:
48:
43:
41:
36:
23:
22:
16:
1244:
1243:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1169:
1168:
1154:« Gonzo fan2007
1153:
1152:
1106:
1078:« Gonzo fan2007
1077:
1076:
1030:« Gonzo fan2007
1029:
1028:
979:« Gonzo fan2007
978:
977:
921:« Gonzo fan2007
920:
919:
912:
907:
893:« Gonzo fan2007
892:
891:
861:Matt Hasselbeck
855:... that after
840:Matt Hasselbeck
834:... that after
823:
790:
782:
753:
733:
722:
693:
682:
633:« Gonzo fan2007
632:
631:
629:
603:
570:Matt Hasselbeck
564:... that after
561:
559:
555:Article history
528:Hey man im josh
496:
490:
479:Knowledge (XXG)
449:Matt Hasselbeck
443:... that after
372:
369:
366:
363:
362:
338:
333:
331:
311:
282:High-importance
265:
262:
259:
256:
255:
223:High‑importance
222:
176:
173:
170:
167:
166:
133:
101:
82:
66:
53:Anyone who has
40:« Gonzo fan2007
39:
38:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1242:
1240:
1232:
1231:
1226:
1221:
1216:
1211:
1206:
1201:
1196:
1191:
1186:
1181:
1171:
1170:
1167:
1166:
1148:
1105:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1019:, probably at
911:
908:
906:
905:
868:, he threw an
847:, he threw an
809:
808:
797:
796:
795:
794:
786:
772:
771:
760:
759:
758:
757:
737:
726:
712:
711:
700:
699:
698:
697:
686:
672:
671:
662:
661:
615:
614:
613:
602:
601:
592:
591:
590:
577:, he threw an
558:
557:
552:
542:
540:
536:
520:
519:
491:
489:
486:
483:
482:
472:
462:
461:
456:, he threw an
417:
405:
404:
401:
400:
397:
396:
389:Low-importance
385:
379:
378:
376:
359:the discussion
344:
343:
327:
315:
314:
312:Low‑importance
306:
294:
293:
290:
289:
278:
272:
271:
269:
252:the discussion
238:
226:
225:
217:
205:
204:
201:
200:
193:Mid-importance
189:
183:
182:
180:
163:the discussion
149:
137:
136:
134:Mid‑importance
128:
116:
115:
109:
98:
84:
83:
26:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1241:
1230:
1227:
1225:
1222:
1220:
1217:
1215:
1212:
1210:
1207:
1205:
1202:
1200:
1197:
1195:
1192:
1190:
1187:
1185:
1182:
1180:
1177:
1176:
1174:
1165:
1160:
1149:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1111:
1110:
1103:
1089:
1084:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1036:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
996:
992:
991:
990:
985:
975:
971:
967:
964:
960:
958:
956:
954:
952:
950:
949:
948:
944:
940:
935:
934:
933:
932:
927:
916:
909:
904:
899:
889:
886:
885:
884:
883:
879:
875:
871:
867:
866:
862:
858:
854:
850:
846:
845:
841:
837:
833:
827:
826:Gonzo fan2007
820:
815:
806:
803:
802:
788:Interesting:
787:
779:
776:
775:
774:
773:
769:
766:
765:
750:
746:
742:
738:
730:
727:
719:
716:
715:
714:
713:
709:
706:
705:
690:
687:
679:
676:
675:
674:
673:
669:
666:
665:
660:
656:
652:
648:
647:
646:
644:
639:
627:
623:
619:
618:Gonzo fan2007
612:
608:
605:
604:
600:
599:
594:
593:
588:
584:
580:
576:
575:
571:
567:
563:
562:
556:
553:
551:
547:
544:
543:
539:
537:
535:
532:
529:
525:
518:
516:
512:
508:
504:
499:
493:
492:
487:
473:
470:
466:
459:
455:
454:
450:
446:
442:
439:
438:
436:
432:
431:
426:
422:
418:
415:
411:
410:
394:
390:
384:
381:
380:
377:
360:
356:
355:
350:
349:
341:
330:
328:
325:
321:
320:
316:
310:
307:
304:
300:
287:
283:
277:
274:
273:
270:
253:
249:
245:
244:
239:
236:
232:
231:
227:
221:
218:
215:
211:
198:
194:
188:
185:
184:
181:
164:
160:
156:
155:
150:
147:
143:
142:
138:
132:
129:
126:
122:
117:
113:
107:
99:
95:
90:
89:
81:
76:
74:
69:
64:
60:
56:
51:
46:
37:Nominated by
34:
30:
25:
18:
17:
1114:
1112:
1108:
1107:
1072:
1068:
1047:WP:CONSENSUS
913:
870:interception
863:
859:quarterback
852:
849:interception
842:
838:quarterback
831:
813:
812:
804:
767:
707:
667:
630:
625:
606:
596:
579:interception
572:
568:quarterback
538:
523:
521:
514:
506:
502:
497:
494:
458:interception
451:
447:quarterback
441:Did you know
440:
430:Did you know
428:
420:
419:A fact from
388:
352:
346:
281:
241:
192:
152:
112:WikiProjects
77:
68:start review
63:good article
54:
52:
28:
27:
888:BeanieFan11
874:BeanieFan11
689:Long enough
651:BeanieFan11
585:cornerback
435:check views
1173:Categories
1113:Saying it
995:WP:DISRUPT
910:Team Logos
745:plagiarism
678:New enough
1025:Fail Mary
999:Fail Mary
587:Al Harris
425:Main Page
364:Wisconsin
354:Wisconsin
309:Wisconsin
1119:Ice Bowl
807:: Done.
739:Free of
668:General:
607:Reviewed
595:Source:
524:promoted
1137:Jameboy
1123:Jameboy
814:Overall
729:Neutral
708:Policy:
546:Comment
427:in the
391:on the
284:on the
195:on the
102:B-class
1158:(talk)
1082:(talk)
1065:WP:NFL
1034:(talk)
1021:WP:NFL
1017:WP:BRD
983:(talk)
974:WP:NFL
970:WP:BRD
963:pointy
925:(talk)
897:(talk)
747:, and
637:(talk)
108:scale.
44:(talk)
1151:game.
1073:where
778:Cited
768:Hook:
1127:talk
1055:talk
1007:talk
943:talk
918:way?
878:talk
853:ALT2
832:ALT1
655:talk
622:talk
550:view
531:talk
276:High
1115:was
1069:who
805:QPQ
548:or
526:by
509:or
383:Low
187:Mid
159:NFL
55:not
1175::
1161:@
1129:)
1085:@
1057:)
1049:?
1037:@
1009:)
986:@
945:)
928:@
900:@
880:)
816::
780::
751::
743:,
731::
720::
691::
680::
657:)
645:.
640:@
609::
541:(
505:,
75:.)
47:@
35:.
1125:(
1075:.
1053:(
1005:(
941:(
876:(
828::
824:@
653:(
626:1
620:(
560:)
517:.
471:.
395:.
288:.
199:.
114::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
