1082:
intent and dont know why. maybe it was a national defense reaction, i dont know), 2. the suggested alternative is listed above. with other suggestions invited for discussion. Bearing in mind that the first incarnation was completely wrong because it is not a BRIC summit as i suggested above as South Africa adds an S. nor was there any reasn for th elong winded hindi "translation" that was readded without reason. just cause most people dont reasd hindi doesntmean we can add our own OR (and to cite the other articles NONE mention "states' minsterial meeting"
572:
361:
381:
562:
541:
667:
646:
54:
772:
751:
272:
677:
241:
1067:
an editor". im asking again the issue of the wording. if you care to do so, discuss it. im also querying the notability of the translation itself, as is my right, and cited my opinion of why such an arguement doesnt work. ive mentioned nothing whatsoever about you nor did i lecture you (as per your talk page comment to "order" me to clean my talk page. This started in so civil a manner i have no idea how it went awry???
209:
782:
1468:. All add good info, but im concerned the vagueness/analysts noted were not notable enough, and im sure not involved in the discussions, to be listed in a manner suggesting their notability for the project getting under way. It could be valuable, im not denying hat, but perhaps as academic and other reactions in the reaction subsection or as one view at the end of this section instead of spreading out.
32:
515:
129:
102:
437:
409:
423:
282:
139:
71:
447:
1179:
877:
856:
997:
this coming from? its pure OR at the moment. and youre not discussing the issue vs. just saying "your wrong and the logic is crap". theres no pt arguing and ive made no intention to do so. im simply stating the wording which needs discussion, or at least a source, and that "because other articles have it" is not a reason to keep.
1066:
Further Who the heck is ordering you to do anything? "get off the high horse and get your tone right, understood?" this is a blatant incivil way to discuss what ive politley asked...what tone is rude? that i made a general comment and invited you to discuss? Dont understand what is "haughty talk from
996:
There are multiple languages and english is a working language. (the beureaucrats and other civil servants from the northeast and south dont speak hindi). Ive already pointed out "should be kept in line with other articles" is not an arguement per guideline above. At any rate, wheres the wording from
980:
Hindi; English was allowed an important status. The Hindi title should be kept, in line with the other summit articles. In fact, the line was a direct Hindi translation of the same sentence used in every summit article, so I don't see the problem. Sorry, but Hindi is prominent and that sort of logic
1536:
Dude, pelase calmly discuss instead of saying things lile "Your edits are being reverted with immediate effect". the names mentioned dont say anythign other that they are analysts...some things just vaguely mentions "analysts said" which is not notabble. BTW- WP does question ntoable people so that
1081:
Incidentally, ive also made a suggested alternative that for some reason was ignored to say im attacking and on my high horse? You said youre open to suggesting changed but have not discussed the issue at all. 1. discussion was the notability (which for some reason personally pissed you off, had no
1035:
cannot be used in such a rigorous manner; this problem of over-using OSE has come up before and frankly it does not solve problems. I am willing to consider a different sentence for the Hindi title but the Hindi title is a must, whatever be the sentence. Yes, unfortunately your logic is nonsensical
1486:
Your edits are being reverted with immediate effect. You practically deleted half the section. It is given in the reference that the people are analysts from international institutions, hence they are notable. I cannot write the names of the institutions because some of them are very long. Refrain
1390:
That was one sentence not drastic reduction. I meant the protests in Tibert are not relevant to this as theyve been going on for years and not in relation to the BRICS summit. Conversely the notable reactions related to this are the ones in Delhi by the
Tibetans. If there are other bits removed (i
1520:
and hence, if the analyst views are taken up by Al
Jazeera, it means that the analysts are notable; international newspapers don't use analyses from any Tom, Dick or Harry. So your reason to remove the content is incorrect. If you have any problem with added content, discuss here first before
1537:
is not true, every one is not notable enough to be cited because this is not wikinews. Just cause an analyst view is taken up by an RS does not mean its encyclopaedic. Im again asking to discuss content on the pseicifc issues. That said im not going to war over the content.
960:
and so is "...states' fourth ministerial meetings". IF need be "BRICS betak" would be better. at any rate, unliek the other BRIC states english is the first/working languge and no need to give prominence to hindi alone. (similar to net years south africa
1171:
Thats a fair compromise. What was with betak above though? Though im not sure about adding 4th as the article title is not as such, it has the year. BUT can you cite some Hindi channel on that use? (then well translate it to mention fourth as the title
1339:
one in which "The summit's main goal was discussing the creation of a development bank," became "The summit's main goal was discussing the creation of a development bank." Further article revision concerning diction will be made tomorrow on my part.
1578:
We also dont give vague comments. You discuss the content and dont make threats. Youre already on probation for civility. If the person is not notable he doesnt get added, there is a notable criteria that you we dont cite any analysts from a fringe
1089:
undiscussed per BRD edit reads: "BRIC deshon ke netaon ki chauthi betak" (silent-ish n's when the last letter of the words) which translates as "BRIC countries' (grammar) ministers' (grammar) fourth summit/meeting" (also note south africas missing
1453:. The common issues/discussions section is more for agenda based issues that were to be discussed, the section in question involved something that was signed and agreed to more concretely, so i think its better in the conclusions sections.
1426:
Cool. I added back a shortened version of the quote. feel free to shorten further. Though the comment was not in reaction to china's statement as much as to the media statement (the passage mentions a state official just above so it was
1369:
Excuse me? Why has this section's content been so drastically reduced? Saying that
Tibetan protests are not notable to the summit is like saying that one can clap with one hand; half of the limelight was on the protesters. I won't
218:
112:
390:
255:
1122:
That also OR/Synthesis as the title which is being translated doesnt mention anything of the sort, nor dos the official name anywhere mention it as such...nor does the past precedent cited above show this.
1063:
is it a must to include? Where has it been used? I havent seen any official or media usage of the hindi term (not sure what the hindi channels are calling it). WP is not bound by the constitution of india.
1411:
True, only the gist of the event was needed. I agree, we don't need the whole speech said by the SWC, but the fact that they did say something should be there. As of now the section looks pretty good. ~*~
1104:
Exactly what are those grammar tags in your post for? The summit belongs to the ministers who in turn belong to the countries, so both "countries'" and "ministers'" are both properly plural possessives.
1660:
223:
370:
251:
927:
1665:
1745:
1790:
917:
1705:
1655:
1795:
893:
1700:
1288:
1785:
1725:
884:
861:
733:
1685:
1740:
1695:
618:
1760:
723:
1044:
me to listen to you and follow you; get off the high horse and get your tone right, understood? I will not take any sort of haughty talk from an editor. ~*~
838:
1765:
1690:
1640:
699:
351:
199:
1775:
828:
628:
505:
1735:
1680:
1650:
1395:, then i agree. That needs consensus to move. i wholly support your restoratin. We can also accomodate and add his sourced content to the original
341:
189:
1563:
Good, then better you don't remove half of the content I add into the article. And sorry but no, we look for RS and that's pretty much that. ~*~
1780:
1755:
1720:
495:
804:
1356:
690:
651:
1710:
1670:
317:
165:
1374:
the entire article back but I am going to put back the deleted content and, if necessary, make tweaks so that the section looks good. ~*~
1750:
1730:
1216:
594:
1770:
795:
756:
1675:
1645:
1715:
313:
295:
246:
152:
107:
82:
585:
546:
470:
460:
414:
1019:
From what I can gather from your comment, what you say about bureaucrats does not change the
Constitution's working. Hindi
593:
related articles on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
950:
1264:
Yes, we can add Hindi numerals. I am trying to find sources which state 2012 BRICS summit or something like that. ~*~
1040:
correct and falls under OR. No point arguing? Sorry but I am not bound to listen to you all the time and you cannot
53:
1605:
And as youve refused to discuss this over almost 4 weeks it seems theres not arguement to cite their notability.(
1352:
1313:
Weve already got a source that consistent with other years so lets stick with that. Aaj Tak is malso a more RS.
300:
88:
889:
360:
1344:
1186:
the restoration and hopefully the issue is closed. Just tagged as per here to get the hindi media source
976:
Your conclusions are pretty much incorrect in certain cases. Firstly, India's premier language is still
892:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
803:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
698:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
164:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1149:
The simplest solution to this :- add the Hindi of "4th BRICS Summit". That's it. चौथा ब्रिक्स सम्मेलन.
1568:
1526:
1492:
1416:
1379:
1348:
1300:
1269:
1224:
1158:
1049:
986:
44:
70:
682:
380:
1110:
31:
1234:
Problem with that as other aticles dont have years. but if we do it can we add hindi numerals?
561:
540:
1610:
1542:
1473:
1432:
1400:
1318:
1239:
1191:
1127:
1095:
1072:
1002:
966:
956:
is not valid to simply add original research claims. the title is first wrong, as it is BRIC
1032:
1565:
1523:
1489:
1413:
1376:
1297:
1266:
1221:
1155:
1046:
983:
787:
161:
1517:
1028:
781:
771:
750:
17:
1634:
1215:(it comes as BRIX, but you now why). So I guess we can use that. Here is the link :-
1106:
287:
144:
666:
645:
695:
577:
452:
271:
240:
1606:
1538:
1469:
1428:
1396:
1314:
1235:
1187:
1153:. That should do it, and yes the Hindi channels are referring to it as such. ~*~
1123:
1091:
1068:
998:
962:
208:
777:
672:
567:
442:
277:
134:
128:
101:
38:
514:
436:
408:
1614:
1573:
1546:
1531:
1497:
1477:
1436:
1421:
1404:
1384:
1322:
1305:
1274:
1243:
1229:
1195:
1163:
1131:
1114:
1099:
1076:
1059:
It would help if you dont resort to NPA attacks and discuss this content.
1054:
1023:
the official language as per the
Constitution, with English being given a
1006:
991:
970:
800:
37:
A news item involving 4th BRICS summit was featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1208:
304:
157:
468:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the
312:
Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
422:
1027:
status. That is the real thing, and what you say also falls under
590:
465:
1508:
Besides, let me remind you that we do not question notability of
876:
855:
1291:
is a source calling the meeting as "चौथी ब्रिक्स शिखर बैठक" -
64:
26:
513:
379:
359:
207:
52:
1391:
just de-wikilinked) then thats apart from me. Ah! you mean
1599:
1596:
1594:
1589:
1587:
1585:
1583:
1466:
1464:
1462:
1460:
1458:
1450:
1392:
1086:
953:
1449:
Some nice edits and additions but i had an issue with
464:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of
1661:
Mid-importance government and laws of Brazil articles
1036:
as I have just stated above; your reason provided is
888:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
799:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
694:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
589:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
156:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
902:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject International relations
1219:. I think adding "2012" will not be a problem. ~*~
1666:Government and laws of Brazil task force articles
1746:B-Class China-related articles of Mid-importance
1791:Mid-importance International relations articles
1706:Politics and law of Russia task force articles
1656:B-Class government and laws of Brazil articles
1602:, sorry but you cant dictate terms to others.
1487:from blatantly removing content like this. ~*~
8:
1796:WikiProject International relations articles
905:Template:WikiProject International relations
219:the Government and Laws of Brazil task force
1701:B-Class Russia (politics and law) articles
850:
745:
640:
535:
403:
235:
96:
1217:ब्रिक्स सम्मेलन का स्वागत करता है अमेरिका
391:the politics and law of Russia task force
1786:B-Class International relations articles
1726:B-Class India articles of Mid-importance
1598:, culminating with an edit summary like
708:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject South Africa
852:
747:
642:
537:
405:
237:
98:
68:
1686:Mid-importance B-Class Russia articles
1741:Mid-importance China-related articles
1696:History of Russia task force articles
7:
1761:Mid-importance South Africa articles
1641:Knowledge (XXG) In the news articles
1335:The 03:48, 30 March 2012 edit was a
882:This article is within the scope of
813:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics
793:This article is within the scope of
688:This article is within the scope of
583:This article is within the scope of
458:This article is within the scope of
293:This article is within the scope of
150:This article is within the scope of
885:WikiProject International relations
522:This article was last assessed in
326:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Russia
174:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Brazil
25:
1766:WikiProject South Africa articles
1691:B-Class Russia (history) articles
1512:, we only question notability of
711:Template:WikiProject South Africa
603:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject China
480:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject India
1776:Mid-importance politics articles
1331:Minor Edit - 3:48, 30 March 2012
1177:
908:International relations articles
875:
854:
780:
770:
749:
675:
665:
644:
570:
560:
539:
445:
435:
421:
407:
371:the history of Russia task force
280:
270:
239:
137:
127:
100:
69:
30:
922:This article has been rated as
833:This article has been rated as
728:This article has been rated as
623:This article has been rated as
500:This article has been rated as
346:This article has been rated as
194:This article has been rated as
1736:B-Class China-related articles
1681:Mid-importance Russia articles
1651:Mid-importance Brazil articles
1295:. I think we can use this. ~*~
87:It is of interest to multiple
1:
1781:WikiProject Politics articles
1756:B-Class South Africa articles
1721:Mid-importance India articles
1119:Prepositions and whathaveyou.
896:and see a list of open tasks.
816:Template:WikiProject Politics
807:and see a list of open tasks.
702:and see a list of open tasks.
597:and see a list of open tasks.
388:This article is supported by
368:This article is supported by
216:This article is supported by
168:and see a list of open tasks.
1593:Then there is more warring:
1711:WikiProject Russia articles
1671:WikiProject Brazil articles
1582:You were also on 3rr here:
1293:Fourth BRICS Summit/Meeting
329:Template:WikiProject Russia
177:Template:WikiProject Brazil
1812:
1751:WikiProject China articles
1731:WikiProject India articles
1615:20:53, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
1532:09:58, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
1498:09:43, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
1478:09:10, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
1437:08:28, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
1422:08:13, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
1405:07:14, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
1385:04:37, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
1323:12:26, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
1306:10:15, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
1275:10:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
1244:09:33, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
1230:08:56, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
1196:08:28, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
1164:08:08, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
1132:07:11, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
1115:20:56, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
1100:10:49, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
1085:For non-Hindi readers the
1077:10:32, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
1055:10:23, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
1007:10:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
992:09:54, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
971:09:51, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
928:project's importance scale
839:project's importance scale
734:project's importance scale
629:project's importance scale
606:Template:WikiProject China
506:project's importance scale
483:Template:WikiProject India
352:project's importance scale
200:project's importance scale
1771:B-Class politics articles
1574:16:30, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
1547:06:44, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
1516:. Al Jazeera is a highly
921:
870:
832:
765:
727:
660:
622:
555:
521:
499:
430:
387:
367:
345:
303:dedicated to coverage of
265:
215:
193:
122:
95:
49:section on 29 March 2012.
1031:. I am sorry to say but
691:WikiProject South Africa
1676:B-Class Russia articles
1646:B-Class Brazil articles
899:International relations
890:International relations
862:International relations
316:, or contribute to the
1716:B-Class India articles
1445:Agenda vs. conclusions
1151:Choutha BRICS sammelan
981:is utter nonsense. ~*~
609:China-related articles
518:
384:
364:
212:
77:This article is rated
58:
18:Talk:2012 BRICS summit
714:South Africa articles
517:
383:
363:
211:
81:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
56:
1025:secondary importance
796:WikiProject Politics
307:on Knowledge (XXG).
683:South Africa portal
113:Government and laws
951:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS
519:
385:
365:
318:project discussion
296:WikiProject Russia
213:
153:WikiProject Brazil
83:content assessment
59:
1361:
1347:comment added by
942:
941:
938:
937:
934:
933:
849:
848:
845:
844:
819:politics articles
744:
743:
740:
739:
639:
638:
635:
634:
586:WikiProject China
534:
533:
530:
529:
461:WikiProject India
402:
401:
398:
397:
234:
233:
230:
229:
63:
62:
16:(Redirected from
1803:
1360:
1341:
1185:
1181:
1180:
910:
909:
906:
903:
900:
879:
872:
871:
866:
858:
851:
821:
820:
817:
814:
811:
790:
785:
784:
774:
767:
766:
761:
753:
746:
716:
715:
712:
709:
706:
685:
680:
679:
678:
669:
662:
661:
656:
648:
641:
611:
610:
607:
604:
601:
580:
575:
574:
573:
564:
557:
556:
551:
543:
536:
488:
487:
484:
481:
478:
455:
450:
449:
448:
439:
432:
431:
426:
425:
424:
419:
411:
404:
334:
333:
330:
327:
324:
290:
285:
284:
283:
274:
267:
266:
261:
258:
256:Politics and law
243:
236:
182:
181:
178:
175:
172:
147:
142:
141:
140:
131:
124:
123:
118:
115:
104:
97:
80:
74:
73:
65:
34:
27:
21:
1811:
1810:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1631:
1630:
1518:reliable source
1447:
1367:
1349:John M. DiNucci
1342:
1333:
1178:
1176:
947:
907:
904:
901:
898:
897:
864:
818:
815:
812:
809:
808:
788:Politics portal
786:
779:
759:
713:
710:
707:
704:
703:
681:
676:
674:
654:
608:
605:
602:
599:
598:
576:
571:
569:
549:
485:
482:
479:
476:
475:
451:
446:
444:
420:
417:
332:Russia articles
331:
328:
325:
322:
321:
310:To participate:
286:
281:
279:
259:
249:
180:Brazil articles
179:
176:
173:
170:
169:
143:
138:
136:
116:
110:
78:
57:Knowledge (XXG)
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1809:
1807:
1799:
1798:
1793:
1788:
1783:
1778:
1773:
1768:
1763:
1758:
1753:
1748:
1743:
1738:
1733:
1728:
1723:
1718:
1713:
1708:
1703:
1698:
1693:
1688:
1683:
1678:
1673:
1668:
1663:
1658:
1653:
1648:
1643:
1633:
1632:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1591:
1580:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1481:
1480:
1446:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1408:
1407:
1366:
1365:Tibet protests
1363:
1332:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1213:BRICS sammelan
1211:reports it as
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1173:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1120:
1083:
1064:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
946:
943:
940:
939:
936:
935:
932:
931:
924:Mid-importance
920:
914:
913:
911:
894:the discussion
880:
868:
867:
865:Mid‑importance
859:
847:
846:
843:
842:
835:Mid-importance
831:
825:
824:
822:
805:the discussion
792:
791:
775:
763:
762:
760:Mid‑importance
754:
742:
741:
738:
737:
730:Mid-importance
726:
720:
719:
717:
700:the discussion
687:
686:
670:
658:
657:
655:Mid‑importance
649:
637:
636:
633:
632:
625:Mid-importance
621:
615:
614:
612:
595:the discussion
582:
581:
565:
553:
552:
550:Mid‑importance
544:
532:
531:
528:
527:
520:
510:
509:
502:Mid-importance
498:
492:
491:
489:
486:India articles
457:
456:
440:
428:
427:
418:Mid‑importance
412:
400:
399:
396:
395:
386:
376:
375:
366:
356:
355:
348:Mid-importance
344:
338:
337:
335:
308:
292:
291:
275:
263:
262:
260:Mid‑importance
244:
232:
231:
228:
227:
224:Mid-importance
214:
204:
203:
196:Mid-importance
192:
186:
185:
183:
166:the discussion
162:related topics
149:
148:
132:
120:
119:
117:Mid‑importance
105:
93:
92:
86:
75:
61:
60:
50:
35:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1808:
1797:
1794:
1792:
1789:
1787:
1784:
1782:
1779:
1777:
1774:
1772:
1769:
1767:
1764:
1762:
1759:
1757:
1754:
1752:
1749:
1747:
1744:
1742:
1739:
1737:
1734:
1732:
1729:
1727:
1724:
1722:
1719:
1717:
1714:
1712:
1709:
1707:
1704:
1702:
1699:
1697:
1694:
1692:
1689:
1687:
1684:
1682:
1679:
1677:
1674:
1672:
1669:
1667:
1664:
1662:
1659:
1657:
1654:
1652:
1649:
1647:
1644:
1642:
1639:
1638:
1636:
1616:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1603:
1601:
1597:
1595:
1592:
1590:
1588:
1586:
1584:
1581:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1571:
1570:
1567:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1529:
1528:
1525:
1521:deleting. ~*~
1519:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1499:
1495:
1494:
1491:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1465:
1463:
1461:
1459:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1452:
1444:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1419:
1418:
1415:
1410:
1409:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1382:
1381:
1378:
1373:
1364:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1338:
1330:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1303:
1302:
1299:
1294:
1290:
1276:
1272:
1271:
1268:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1227:
1226:
1223:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1184:
1174:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1161:
1160:
1157:
1152:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1065:
1062:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1052:
1051:
1048:
1043:
1039:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1008:
1004:
1000:
995:
994:
993:
989:
988:
985:
979:
975:
974:
973:
972:
968:
964:
959:
955:
952:
944:
929:
925:
919:
916:
915:
912:
895:
891:
887:
886:
881:
878:
874:
873:
869:
863:
860:
857:
853:
840:
836:
830:
827:
826:
823:
806:
802:
798:
797:
789:
783:
778:
776:
773:
769:
768:
764:
758:
755:
752:
748:
735:
731:
725:
722:
721:
718:
701:
697:
693:
692:
684:
673:
671:
668:
664:
663:
659:
653:
650:
647:
643:
630:
626:
620:
617:
616:
613:
596:
592:
588:
587:
579:
568:
566:
563:
559:
558:
554:
548:
545:
542:
538:
525:
516:
512:
511:
507:
503:
497:
494:
493:
490:
473:
472:
467:
463:
462:
454:
443:
441:
438:
434:
433:
429:
416:
413:
410:
406:
393:
392:
382:
378:
377:
373:
372:
362:
358:
357:
353:
349:
343:
340:
339:
336:
319:
315:
311:
306:
302:
298:
297:
289:
288:Russia portal
278:
276:
273:
269:
268:
264:
257:
253:
248:
245:
242:
238:
225:
222:(assessed as
221:
220:
210:
206:
205:
201:
197:
191:
188:
187:
184:
167:
163:
159:
155:
154:
146:
145:Brazil portal
135:
133:
130:
126:
125:
121:
114:
109:
106:
103:
99:
94:
90:
84:
76:
72:
67:
66:
55:
51:
48:
47:
46:
40:
36:
33:
29:
28:
19:
1564:
1522:
1513:
1509:
1488:
1448:
1412:
1375:
1371:
1368:
1343:— Preceding
1336:
1334:
1296:
1292:
1287:
1265:
1220:
1212:
1182:
1154:
1150:
1148:
1060:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1024:
1020:
982:
977:
957:
948:
923:
883:
834:
794:
729:
705:South Africa
696:South Africa
689:
652:South Africa
624:
584:
578:China portal
523:
501:
471:project page
469:
459:
453:India portal
389:
369:
347:
314:project page
309:
294:
217:
195:
151:
89:WikiProjects
43:
42:
945:Hindi title
301:WikiProject
45:In the news
1635:Categories
1427:deceptive)
978:officially
1457:Further ]
1451:this move
39:Main Page
1357:contribs
1345:unsigned
1107:Khajidha
1090:acronym)
810:Politics
801:politics
757:Politics
524:May 2012
1579:outlet.
1514:sources
1209:Aaj Tak
1172:doesnt)
1087:readded
961:summit)
926:on the
837:on the
732:on the
627:on the
504:on the
350:on the
252:History
198:on the
79:B-class
41:in the
1607:Lihaas
1539:Lihaas
1510:people
1470:Lihaas
1429:Lihaas
1397:Lihaas
1372:revert
1315:Lihaas
1236:Lihaas
1188:Lihaas
1124:Lihaas
1092:Lihaas
1069:Lihaas
1033:WP:OSE
999:Lihaas
963:Lihaas
323:Russia
305:Russia
247:Russia
171:Brazil
158:Brazil
108:Brazil
85:scale.
1569:Bhatt
1566:Ankit
1527:Bhatt
1524:Ankit
1493:Bhatt
1490:Ankit
1417:Bhatt
1414:Ankit
1380:Bhatt
1377:Ankit
1337:minor
1301:Bhatt
1298:Ankit
1270:Bhatt
1267:Ankit
1225:Bhatt
1222:Ankit
1159:Bhatt
1156:Ankit
1050:Bhatt
1047:Ankit
1042:order
1029:WP:OR
987:Bhatt
984:Ankit
600:China
591:China
547:China
477:India
466:India
415:India
1611:talk
1600:this
1572:~*~
1543:talk
1530:~*~
1496:~*~
1474:talk
1433:talk
1420:~*~
1401:talk
1393:this
1383:~*~
1353:talk
1319:talk
1304:~*~
1289:Here
1273:~*~
1240:talk
1228:~*~
1192:talk
1183:Done
1175:Ive
1162:~*~
1128:talk
1111:talk
1096:talk
1073:talk
1053:~*~
1003:talk
990:~*~
967:talk
954:this
949:Per
299:, a
160:and
1061:Why
1038:not
918:Mid
829:Mid
724:Mid
619:Mid
496:Mid
342:Mid
190:Mid
1637::
1617:).
1613:)
1545:)
1476:)
1435:)
1403:)
1359:)
1355:•
1321:)
1242:)
1194:)
1130:)
1113:)
1105:--
1098:)
1075:)
1021:is
1005:)
969:)
254:/
250::
226:).
111::
1609:(
1541:(
1472:(
1431:(
1399:(
1351:(
1317:(
1238:(
1190:(
1126:(
1109:(
1094:(
1071:(
1001:(
965:(
958:S
930:.
841:.
736:.
631:.
526:.
508:.
474:.
394:.
374:.
354:.
320:.
202:.
91:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.