Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:4th BRICS summit

Source 📝

1082:
intent and dont know why. maybe it was a national defense reaction, i dont know), 2. the suggested alternative is listed above. with other suggestions invited for discussion. Bearing in mind that the first incarnation was completely wrong because it is not a BRIC summit as i suggested above as South Africa adds an S. nor was there any reasn for th elong winded hindi "translation" that was readded without reason. just cause most people dont reasd hindi doesntmean we can add our own OR (and to cite the other articles NONE mention "states' minsterial meeting"
572: 361: 381: 562: 541: 667: 646: 54: 772: 751: 272: 677: 241: 1067:
an editor". im asking again the issue of the wording. if you care to do so, discuss it. im also querying the notability of the translation itself, as is my right, and cited my opinion of why such an arguement doesnt work. ive mentioned nothing whatsoever about you nor did i lecture you (as per your talk page comment to "order" me to clean my talk page. This started in so civil a manner i have no idea how it went awry???
209: 782: 1468:. All add good info, but im concerned the vagueness/analysts noted were not notable enough, and im sure not involved in the discussions, to be listed in a manner suggesting their notability for the project getting under way. It could be valuable, im not denying hat, but perhaps as academic and other reactions in the reaction subsection or as one view at the end of this section instead of spreading out. 32: 515: 129: 102: 437: 409: 423: 282: 139: 71: 447: 1179: 877: 856: 997:
this coming from? its pure OR at the moment. and youre not discussing the issue vs. just saying "your wrong and the logic is crap". theres no pt arguing and ive made no intention to do so. im simply stating the wording which needs discussion, or at least a source, and that "because other articles have it" is not a reason to keep.
1066:
Further Who the heck is ordering you to do anything? "get off the high horse and get your tone right, understood?" this is a blatant incivil way to discuss what ive politley asked...what tone is rude? that i made a general comment and invited you to discuss? Dont understand what is "haughty talk from
996:
There are multiple languages and english is a working language. (the beureaucrats and other civil servants from the northeast and south dont speak hindi). Ive already pointed out "should be kept in line with other articles" is not an arguement per guideline above. At any rate, wheres the wording from
980:
Hindi; English was allowed an important status. The Hindi title should be kept, in line with the other summit articles. In fact, the line was a direct Hindi translation of the same sentence used in every summit article, so I don't see the problem. Sorry, but Hindi is prominent and that sort of logic
1536:
Dude, pelase calmly discuss instead of saying things lile "Your edits are being reverted with immediate effect". the names mentioned dont say anythign other that they are analysts...some things just vaguely mentions "analysts said" which is not notabble. BTW- WP does question ntoable people so that
1081:
Incidentally, ive also made a suggested alternative that for some reason was ignored to say im attacking and on my high horse? You said youre open to suggesting changed but have not discussed the issue at all. 1. discussion was the notability (which for some reason personally pissed you off, had no
1035:
cannot be used in such a rigorous manner; this problem of over-using OSE has come up before and frankly it does not solve problems. I am willing to consider a different sentence for the Hindi title but the Hindi title is a must, whatever be the sentence. Yes, unfortunately your logic is nonsensical
1486:
Your edits are being reverted with immediate effect. You practically deleted half the section. It is given in the reference that the people are analysts from international institutions, hence they are notable. I cannot write the names of the institutions because some of them are very long. Refrain
1390:
That was one sentence not drastic reduction. I meant the protests in Tibert are not relevant to this as theyve been going on for years and not in relation to the BRICS summit. Conversely the notable reactions related to this are the ones in Delhi by the Tibetans. If there are other bits removed (i
1520:
and hence, if the analyst views are taken up by Al Jazeera, it means that the analysts are notable; international newspapers don't use analyses from any Tom, Dick or Harry. So your reason to remove the content is incorrect. If you have any problem with added content, discuss here first before
1537:
is not true, every one is not notable enough to be cited because this is not wikinews. Just cause an analyst view is taken up by an RS does not mean its encyclopaedic. Im again asking to discuss content on the pseicifc issues. That said im not going to war over the content.
960:
and so is "...states' fourth ministerial meetings". IF need be "BRICS betak" would be better. at any rate, unliek the other BRIC states english is the first/working languge and no need to give prominence to hindi alone. (similar to net years south africa
1171:
Thats a fair compromise. What was with betak above though? Though im not sure about adding 4th as the article title is not as such, it has the year. BUT can you cite some Hindi channel on that use? (then well translate it to mention fourth as the title
1339:
one in which "The summit's main goal was discussing the creation of a development bank," became "The summit's main goal was discussing the creation of a development bank." Further article revision concerning diction will be made tomorrow on my part.
1578:
We also dont give vague comments. You discuss the content and dont make threats. Youre already on probation for civility. If the person is not notable he doesnt get added, there is a notable criteria that you we dont cite any analysts from a fringe
1089:
undiscussed per BRD edit reads: "BRIC deshon ke netaon ki chauthi betak" (silent-ish n's when the last letter of the words) which translates as "BRIC countries' (grammar) ministers' (grammar) fourth summit/meeting" (also note south africas missing
1453:. The common issues/discussions section is more for agenda based issues that were to be discussed, the section in question involved something that was signed and agreed to more concretely, so i think its better in the conclusions sections. 1426:
Cool. I added back a shortened version of the quote. feel free to shorten further. Though the comment was not in reaction to china's statement as much as to the media statement (the passage mentions a state official just above so it was
1369:
Excuse me? Why has this section's content been so drastically reduced? Saying that Tibetan protests are not notable to the summit is like saying that one can clap with one hand; half of the limelight was on the protesters. I won't
218: 112: 390: 255: 1122:
That also OR/Synthesis as the title which is being translated doesnt mention anything of the sort, nor dos the official name anywhere mention it as such...nor does the past precedent cited above show this.
1063:
is it a must to include? Where has it been used? I havent seen any official or media usage of the hindi term (not sure what the hindi channels are calling it). WP is not bound by the constitution of india.
1411:
True, only the gist of the event was needed. I agree, we don't need the whole speech said by the SWC, but the fact that they did say something should be there. As of now the section looks pretty good. ~*~
1104:
Exactly what are those grammar tags in your post for? The summit belongs to the ministers who in turn belong to the countries, so both "countries'" and "ministers'" are both properly plural possessives.
1660: 223: 370: 251: 927: 1665: 1745: 1790: 917: 1705: 1655: 1795: 893: 1700: 1288: 1785: 1725: 884: 861: 733: 1685: 1740: 1695: 618: 1760: 723: 1044:
me to listen to you and follow you; get off the high horse and get your tone right, understood? I will not take any sort of haughty talk from an editor. ~*~
838: 1765: 1690: 1640: 699: 351: 199: 1775: 828: 628: 505: 1735: 1680: 1650: 1395:, then i agree. That needs consensus to move. i wholly support your restoratin. We can also accomodate and add his sourced content to the original 341: 189: 1563:
Good, then better you don't remove half of the content I add into the article. And sorry but no, we look for RS and that's pretty much that. ~*~
1780: 1755: 1720: 495: 804: 1356: 690: 651: 1710: 1670: 317: 165: 1374:
the entire article back but I am going to put back the deleted content and, if necessary, make tweaks so that the section looks good. ~*~
1750: 1730: 1216: 594: 1770: 795: 756: 1675: 1645: 1715: 313: 295: 246: 152: 107: 82: 585: 546: 470: 460: 414: 1019:
From what I can gather from your comment, what you say about bureaucrats does not change the Constitution's working. Hindi
593:
related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
950: 1264:
Yes, we can add Hindi numerals. I am trying to find sources which state 2012 BRICS summit or something like that. ~*~
1040:
correct and falls under OR. No point arguing? Sorry but I am not bound to listen to you all the time and you cannot
53: 1605:
And as youve refused to discuss this over almost 4 weeks it seems theres not arguement to cite their notability.(
1352: 1313:
Weve already got a source that consistent with other years so lets stick with that. Aaj Tak is malso a more RS.
300: 88: 889: 360: 1344: 1186:
the restoration and hopefully the issue is closed. Just tagged as per here to get the hindi media source
976:
Your conclusions are pretty much incorrect in certain cases. Firstly, India's premier language is still
892:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
803:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
698:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
164:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1149:
The simplest solution to this :- add the Hindi of "4th BRICS Summit". That's it. चौथा ब्रिक्स सम्मेलन.
1568: 1526: 1492: 1416: 1379: 1348: 1300: 1269: 1224: 1158: 1049: 986: 44: 70: 682: 380: 1110: 31: 1234:
Problem with that as other aticles dont have years. but if we do it can we add hindi numerals?
561: 540: 1610: 1542: 1473: 1432: 1400: 1318: 1239: 1191: 1127: 1095: 1072: 1002: 966: 956:
is not valid to simply add original research claims. the title is first wrong, as it is BRIC
1032: 1565: 1523: 1489: 1413: 1376: 1297: 1266: 1221: 1155: 1046: 983: 787: 161: 1517: 1028: 781: 771: 750: 17: 1634: 1215:(it comes as BRIX, but you now why). So I guess we can use that. Here is the link :- 1106: 287: 144: 666: 645: 695: 577: 452: 271: 240: 1606: 1538: 1469: 1428: 1396: 1314: 1235: 1187: 1153:. That should do it, and yes the Hindi channels are referring to it as such. ~*~ 1123: 1091: 1068: 998: 962: 208: 777: 672: 567: 442: 277: 134: 128: 101: 38: 514: 436: 408: 1614: 1573: 1546: 1531: 1497: 1477: 1436: 1421: 1404: 1384: 1322: 1305: 1274: 1243: 1229: 1195: 1163: 1131: 1114: 1099: 1076: 1059:
It would help if you dont resort to NPA attacks and discuss this content.
1054: 1023:
the official language as per the Constitution, with English being given a
1006: 991: 970: 800: 37:
A news item involving 4th BRICS summit was featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1208: 304: 157: 468:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 312:
Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
422: 1027:
status. That is the real thing, and what you say also falls under
590: 465: 1508:
Besides, let me remind you that we do not question notability of
876: 855: 1291:
is a source calling the meeting as "चौथी ब्रिक्स शिखर बैठक" -
64: 26: 513: 379: 359: 207: 52: 1391:
just de-wikilinked) then thats apart from me. Ah! you mean
1599: 1596: 1594: 1589: 1587: 1585: 1583: 1466: 1464: 1462: 1460: 1458: 1450: 1392: 1086: 953: 1449:
Some nice edits and additions but i had an issue with
464:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of 1661:
Mid-importance government and laws of Brazil articles
1036:
as I have just stated above; your reason provided is
888:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 799:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 694:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 589:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 156:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 902:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject International relations
1219:. I think adding "2012" will not be a problem. ~*~ 1666:Government and laws of Brazil task force articles 1746:B-Class China-related articles of Mid-importance 1791:Mid-importance International relations articles 1706:Politics and law of Russia task force articles 1656:B-Class government and laws of Brazil articles 1602:, sorry but you cant dictate terms to others. 1487:from blatantly removing content like this. ~*~ 8: 1796:WikiProject International relations articles 905:Template:WikiProject International relations 219:the Government and Laws of Brazil task force 1701:B-Class Russia (politics and law) articles 850: 745: 640: 535: 403: 235: 96: 1217:ब्रिक्स सम्मेलन का स्वागत करता है अमेरिका 391:the politics and law of Russia task force 1786:B-Class International relations articles 1726:B-Class India articles of Mid-importance 1598:, culminating with an edit summary like 708:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject South Africa 852: 747: 642: 537: 405: 237: 98: 68: 1686:Mid-importance B-Class Russia articles 1741:Mid-importance China-related articles 1696:History of Russia task force articles 7: 1761:Mid-importance South Africa articles 1641:Knowledge (XXG) In the news articles 1335:The 03:48, 30 March 2012 edit was a 882:This article is within the scope of 813:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics 793:This article is within the scope of 688:This article is within the scope of 583:This article is within the scope of 458:This article is within the scope of 293:This article is within the scope of 150:This article is within the scope of 885:WikiProject International relations 522:This article was last assessed in 326:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Russia 174:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Brazil 25: 1766:WikiProject South Africa articles 1691:B-Class Russia (history) articles 1512:, we only question notability of 711:Template:WikiProject South Africa 603:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject China 480:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject India 1776:Mid-importance politics articles 1331:Minor Edit - 3:48, 30 March 2012 1177: 908:International relations articles 875: 854: 780: 770: 749: 675: 665: 644: 570: 560: 539: 445: 435: 421: 407: 371:the history of Russia task force 280: 270: 239: 137: 127: 100: 69: 30: 922:This article has been rated as 833:This article has been rated as 728:This article has been rated as 623:This article has been rated as 500:This article has been rated as 346:This article has been rated as 194:This article has been rated as 1736:B-Class China-related articles 1681:Mid-importance Russia articles 1651:Mid-importance Brazil articles 1295:. I think we can use this. ~*~ 87:It is of interest to multiple 1: 1781:WikiProject Politics articles 1756:B-Class South Africa articles 1721:Mid-importance India articles 1119:Prepositions and whathaveyou. 896:and see a list of open tasks. 816:Template:WikiProject Politics 807:and see a list of open tasks. 702:and see a list of open tasks. 597:and see a list of open tasks. 388:This article is supported by 368:This article is supported by 216:This article is supported by 168:and see a list of open tasks. 1593:Then there is more warring: 1711:WikiProject Russia articles 1671:WikiProject Brazil articles 1582:You were also on 3rr here: 1293:Fourth BRICS Summit/Meeting 329:Template:WikiProject Russia 177:Template:WikiProject Brazil 1812: 1751:WikiProject China articles 1731:WikiProject India articles 1615:20:53, 26 April 2012 (UTC) 1532:09:58, 31 March 2012 (UTC) 1498:09:43, 31 March 2012 (UTC) 1478:09:10, 31 March 2012 (UTC) 1437:08:28, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 1422:08:13, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 1405:07:14, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 1385:04:37, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 1323:12:26, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 1306:10:15, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 1275:10:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 1244:09:33, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 1230:08:56, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 1196:08:28, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 1164:08:08, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 1132:07:11, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 1115:20:56, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 1100:10:49, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 1085:For non-Hindi readers the 1077:10:32, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 1055:10:23, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 1007:10:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 992:09:54, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 971:09:51, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 928:project's importance scale 839:project's importance scale 734:project's importance scale 629:project's importance scale 606:Template:WikiProject China 506:project's importance scale 483:Template:WikiProject India 352:project's importance scale 200:project's importance scale 1771:B-Class politics articles 1574:16:30, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 1547:06:44, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 1516:. Al Jazeera is a highly 921: 870: 832: 765: 727: 660: 622: 555: 521: 499: 430: 387: 367: 345: 303:dedicated to coverage of 265: 215: 193: 122: 95: 49:section on 29 March 2012. 1031:. I am sorry to say but 691:WikiProject South Africa 1676:B-Class Russia articles 1646:B-Class Brazil articles 899:International relations 890:International relations 862:International relations 316:, or contribute to the 1716:B-Class India articles 1445:Agenda vs. conclusions 1151:Choutha BRICS sammelan 981:is utter nonsense. ~*~ 609:China-related articles 518: 384: 364: 212: 77:This article is rated 58: 18:Talk:2012 BRICS summit 714:South Africa articles 517: 383: 363: 211: 81:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 56: 1025:secondary importance 796:WikiProject Politics 307:on Knowledge (XXG). 683:South Africa portal 113:Government and laws 951:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS 519: 385: 365: 318:project discussion 296:WikiProject Russia 213: 153:WikiProject Brazil 83:content assessment 59: 1361: 1347:comment added by 942: 941: 938: 937: 934: 933: 849: 848: 845: 844: 819:politics articles 744: 743: 740: 739: 639: 638: 635: 634: 586:WikiProject China 534: 533: 530: 529: 461:WikiProject India 402: 401: 398: 397: 234: 233: 230: 229: 63: 62: 16:(Redirected from 1803: 1360: 1341: 1185: 1181: 1180: 910: 909: 906: 903: 900: 879: 872: 871: 866: 858: 851: 821: 820: 817: 814: 811: 790: 785: 784: 774: 767: 766: 761: 753: 746: 716: 715: 712: 709: 706: 685: 680: 679: 678: 669: 662: 661: 656: 648: 641: 611: 610: 607: 604: 601: 580: 575: 574: 573: 564: 557: 556: 551: 543: 536: 488: 487: 484: 481: 478: 455: 450: 449: 448: 439: 432: 431: 426: 425: 424: 419: 411: 404: 334: 333: 330: 327: 324: 290: 285: 284: 283: 274: 267: 266: 261: 258: 256:Politics and law 243: 236: 182: 181: 178: 175: 172: 147: 142: 141: 140: 131: 124: 123: 118: 115: 104: 97: 80: 74: 73: 65: 34: 27: 21: 1811: 1810: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1631: 1630: 1518:reliable source 1447: 1367: 1349:John M. DiNucci 1342: 1333: 1178: 1176: 947: 907: 904: 901: 898: 897: 864: 818: 815: 812: 809: 808: 788:Politics portal 786: 779: 759: 713: 710: 707: 704: 703: 681: 676: 674: 654: 608: 605: 602: 599: 598: 576: 571: 569: 549: 485: 482: 479: 476: 475: 451: 446: 444: 420: 417: 332:Russia articles 331: 328: 325: 322: 321: 310:To participate: 286: 281: 279: 259: 249: 180:Brazil articles 179: 176: 173: 170: 169: 143: 138: 136: 116: 110: 78: 57:Knowledge (XXG) 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1809: 1807: 1799: 1798: 1793: 1788: 1783: 1778: 1773: 1768: 1763: 1758: 1753: 1748: 1743: 1738: 1733: 1728: 1723: 1718: 1713: 1708: 1703: 1698: 1693: 1688: 1683: 1678: 1673: 1668: 1663: 1658: 1653: 1648: 1643: 1633: 1632: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1591: 1580: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1481: 1480: 1446: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1408: 1407: 1366: 1365:Tibet protests 1363: 1332: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1213:BRICS sammelan 1211:reports it as 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1173: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1120: 1083: 1064: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 946: 943: 940: 939: 936: 935: 932: 931: 924:Mid-importance 920: 914: 913: 911: 894:the discussion 880: 868: 867: 865:Mid‑importance 859: 847: 846: 843: 842: 835:Mid-importance 831: 825: 824: 822: 805:the discussion 792: 791: 775: 763: 762: 760:Mid‑importance 754: 742: 741: 738: 737: 730:Mid-importance 726: 720: 719: 717: 700:the discussion 687: 686: 670: 658: 657: 655:Mid‑importance 649: 637: 636: 633: 632: 625:Mid-importance 621: 615: 614: 612: 595:the discussion 582: 581: 565: 553: 552: 550:Mid‑importance 544: 532: 531: 528: 527: 520: 510: 509: 502:Mid-importance 498: 492: 491: 489: 486:India articles 457: 456: 440: 428: 427: 418:Mid‑importance 412: 400: 399: 396: 395: 386: 376: 375: 366: 356: 355: 348:Mid-importance 344: 338: 337: 335: 308: 292: 291: 275: 263: 262: 260:Mid‑importance 244: 232: 231: 228: 227: 224:Mid-importance 214: 204: 203: 196:Mid-importance 192: 186: 185: 183: 166:the discussion 162:related topics 149: 148: 132: 120: 119: 117:Mid‑importance 105: 93: 92: 86: 75: 61: 60: 50: 35: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1808: 1797: 1794: 1792: 1789: 1787: 1784: 1782: 1779: 1777: 1774: 1772: 1769: 1767: 1764: 1762: 1759: 1757: 1754: 1752: 1749: 1747: 1744: 1742: 1739: 1737: 1734: 1732: 1729: 1727: 1724: 1722: 1719: 1717: 1714: 1712: 1709: 1707: 1704: 1702: 1699: 1697: 1694: 1692: 1689: 1687: 1684: 1682: 1679: 1677: 1674: 1672: 1669: 1667: 1664: 1662: 1659: 1657: 1654: 1652: 1649: 1647: 1644: 1642: 1639: 1638: 1636: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1603: 1601: 1597: 1595: 1592: 1590: 1588: 1586: 1584: 1581: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1571: 1570: 1567: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1529: 1528: 1525: 1521:deleting. ~*~ 1519: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1499: 1495: 1494: 1491: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1465: 1463: 1461: 1459: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1452: 1444: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1419: 1418: 1415: 1410: 1409: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1382: 1381: 1378: 1373: 1364: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1338: 1330: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1303: 1302: 1299: 1294: 1290: 1276: 1272: 1271: 1268: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1227: 1226: 1223: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1184: 1174: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1161: 1160: 1157: 1152: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1065: 1062: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1051: 1048: 1043: 1039: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1008: 1004: 1000: 995: 994: 993: 989: 988: 985: 979: 975: 974: 973: 972: 968: 964: 959: 955: 952: 944: 929: 925: 919: 916: 915: 912: 895: 891: 887: 886: 881: 878: 874: 873: 869: 863: 860: 857: 853: 840: 836: 830: 827: 826: 823: 806: 802: 798: 797: 789: 783: 778: 776: 773: 769: 768: 764: 758: 755: 752: 748: 735: 731: 725: 722: 721: 718: 701: 697: 693: 692: 684: 673: 671: 668: 664: 663: 659: 653: 650: 647: 643: 630: 626: 620: 617: 616: 613: 596: 592: 588: 587: 579: 568: 566: 563: 559: 558: 554: 548: 545: 542: 538: 525: 516: 512: 511: 507: 503: 497: 494: 493: 490: 473: 472: 467: 463: 462: 454: 443: 441: 438: 434: 433: 429: 416: 413: 410: 406: 393: 392: 382: 378: 377: 373: 372: 362: 358: 357: 353: 349: 343: 340: 339: 336: 319: 315: 311: 306: 302: 298: 297: 289: 288:Russia portal 278: 276: 273: 269: 268: 264: 257: 253: 248: 245: 242: 238: 225: 222:(assessed as 221: 220: 210: 206: 205: 201: 197: 191: 188: 187: 184: 167: 163: 159: 155: 154: 146: 145:Brazil portal 135: 133: 130: 126: 125: 121: 114: 109: 106: 103: 99: 94: 90: 84: 76: 72: 67: 66: 55: 51: 48: 47: 46: 40: 36: 33: 29: 28: 19: 1564: 1522: 1513: 1509: 1488: 1448: 1412: 1375: 1371: 1368: 1343:— Preceding 1336: 1334: 1296: 1292: 1287: 1265: 1220: 1212: 1182: 1154: 1150: 1148: 1060: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1024: 1020: 982: 977: 957: 948: 923: 883: 834: 794: 729: 705:South Africa 696:South Africa 689: 652:South Africa 624: 584: 578:China portal 523: 501: 471:project page 469: 459: 453:India portal 389: 369: 347: 314:project page 309: 294: 217: 195: 151: 89:WikiProjects 43: 42: 945:Hindi title 301:WikiProject 45:In the news 1635:Categories 1427:deceptive) 978:officially 1457:Further ] 1451:this move 39:Main Page 1357:contribs 1345:unsigned 1107:Khajidha 1090:acronym) 810:Politics 801:politics 757:Politics 524:May 2012 1579:outlet. 1514:sources 1209:Aaj Tak 1172:doesnt) 1087:readded 961:summit) 926:on the 837:on the 732:on the 627:on the 504:on the 350:on the 252:History 198:on the 79:B-class 41:in the 1607:Lihaas 1539:Lihaas 1510:people 1470:Lihaas 1429:Lihaas 1397:Lihaas 1372:revert 1315:Lihaas 1236:Lihaas 1188:Lihaas 1124:Lihaas 1092:Lihaas 1069:Lihaas 1033:WP:OSE 999:Lihaas 963:Lihaas 323:Russia 305:Russia 247:Russia 171:Brazil 158:Brazil 108:Brazil 85:scale. 1569:Bhatt 1566:Ankit 1527:Bhatt 1524:Ankit 1493:Bhatt 1490:Ankit 1417:Bhatt 1414:Ankit 1380:Bhatt 1377:Ankit 1337:minor 1301:Bhatt 1298:Ankit 1270:Bhatt 1267:Ankit 1225:Bhatt 1222:Ankit 1159:Bhatt 1156:Ankit 1050:Bhatt 1047:Ankit 1042:order 1029:WP:OR 987:Bhatt 984:Ankit 600:China 591:China 547:China 477:India 466:India 415:India 1611:talk 1600:this 1572:~*~ 1543:talk 1530:~*~ 1496:~*~ 1474:talk 1433:talk 1420:~*~ 1401:talk 1393:this 1383:~*~ 1353:talk 1319:talk 1304:~*~ 1289:Here 1273:~*~ 1240:talk 1228:~*~ 1192:talk 1183:Done 1175:Ive 1162:~*~ 1128:talk 1111:talk 1096:talk 1073:talk 1053:~*~ 1003:talk 990:~*~ 967:talk 954:this 949:Per 299:, a 160:and 1061:Why 1038:not 918:Mid 829:Mid 724:Mid 619:Mid 496:Mid 342:Mid 190:Mid 1637:: 1617:). 1613:) 1545:) 1476:) 1435:) 1403:) 1359:) 1355:• 1321:) 1242:) 1194:) 1130:) 1113:) 1105:-- 1098:) 1075:) 1021:is 1005:) 969:) 254:/ 250:: 226:). 111:: 1609:( 1541:( 1472:( 1431:( 1399:( 1351:( 1317:( 1238:( 1190:( 1126:( 1109:( 1094:( 1071:( 1001:( 965:( 958:S 930:. 841:. 736:. 631:. 526:. 508:. 474:. 394:. 374:. 354:. 320:. 202:. 91:. 20:)

Index

Talk:2012 BRICS summit
In the news
Main Page
In the news
Knowledge (XXG)

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Brazil
Government and laws
WikiProject icon
Brazil portal
WikiProject Brazil
Brazil
related topics
the discussion
Mid
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
the Government and Laws of Brazil task force
Mid-importance
WikiProject icon
Russia
History
Politics and law
WikiProject icon
Russia portal
WikiProject Russia
WikiProject

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.