1694:, even though every person discharging a firearm that day was either US army or Army civilian base police. In this case it appears as though a very small number of bikers fired handguns, and a large number of police opened fire on the poorly armed crowd. It may be found that only one or two bikers discharged a firearm; bikers that have been able to speak out certainly maintain so. It doesn't appear that a single law enforcement officer was hit by gunfire; 27 bike club members were killed or injured. Given the lack of accurate information, I think a very neutral stance (based on the reliable sources) is advised. Based on the evidence so far, I'd prefer the unquestionably accurate "2015 Waco police shooting", but I know that doesn't fit the sources to date. Eventually the word "massacre" might be applied by RS to this event. Sorry for my wall of text, but that's why I prefer the shorter less descriptive title at this time. Unless another shootout occurs in Waco this year (god forbid), I see no reason to add an unnecessary descriptor.
1095:
sources, as long as they are reliable. Solid reliable sources are increasingly calling the Waco PD statements into question. As long as the sources are reliable, we should pay attention. If, as time goes by, the coverage shifts, then so too, this article should as well. One key missing fact, as I see it, is how many who died were killed by other bikers, and how many were killed by the police? What is the count? And who fired the shots? And if some were killed by the police, is there solid evidence that those people killed were aggressors? There is much that is unknown about this incident. How many of the 170+ who have been arrested actually committed criminal acts? There is great doubt about culpability. There seems little doubt that a large number of innocent people are now jailed. Wearing a vest with a motorcycle club logo is not
312:
285:
140:
322:
217:
196:
415:
1432:, and agree that we need to wait to see how this shakes out in reliable sources. My hunch is that what actually happened is dramatically different than what the Waco PD initially reported. So let's all keep our eyes peeled for breaking news. The LA Times published a quite sceptical story on the legal issues today, and I have a strong suspicion that several major papers are investigating this matter diligently.
164:
427:
22:
84:
53:
1395:, which I know is not a reliable source, gives a reasonable perspective and explains a lot, if true. I'm starting to come around to the view that RS has been completely hoodwinked by Waco police spokespersons. I'm aware we're compelled to say what the sources say, but I suspect we're going to discover this page is inaccurate in many regards.
1196:
I noticed the day that this hit that most of the editors working on it were relatively new, but very enthusiastic. Up until today, they have been doing a bang up job. In the past few days a few more experienced editors have entered the fray, and I think all in all this article is shaping up great.
1866:
he explains how the Waco Police
Department teaches children to ask for and accept candy from strangers at 2:30 am, then hop in their car. Then they teach the mom to watch her apparently sleeping kid more closely by locking her in jail, pending $ 2,000. Not to put too fine a point on it, but would it
1811:
series of edits by
InedibleHulk and it got me to thinking of when we should mention names of non-notable people on the edge of events. I have seen articles where different agencies (government and non-government) made announcements and press briefings and every time the name got mentioned of someone
1914:
Yeah, he is the public arm and well face of the Waco police. When people say they won't see him again unless it is in regards to that story, that tells me they do not live in that area. Almost every police department has someone as their public information officer to talk to the media on a regular
1685:
The reason I don't like the addition of the word biker has nothing to do with it's descriptive quality or its accuracy. There's little question that biker clubs were participants. My concern is the addition of the word "biker" appears to make a judgment about responsibility before we know enough to
879:
I noticed that the article consistently says nine deaths, but the infobox says 10. There's been several edits since then so I can't tell if the infobox is wrong, or that we're missing information in the text. This was the edit that changed it from 9 to 10, only citing that "one man died later @ the
822:
Also the calendar could be deceptive. From this primary source, we do not know who arranged the meeting, just that somebody put it on the calendar and claimed it was a sanctioned meeting. It could have been put in just after the fact. (I know that is not likely.) In news reports we have a biker who
783:
on primary sources, only on USING them for made-up arguments i.e. original research and such. Our job here is to help people research the topic, not to play keep-away and make it hard for people to get the facts and make up their own minds. By letting people go directly to the site, they can make
699:
News story was on the local news and I drove past the area headed to Austin during Labor Day weekend where it seemed that everything was back to normal, sans Twin Peaks. But I did stop by a Twin Peaks in Dallas once, over priced food and eye candy wasn't all that great. Might have been because it
581:
Some of the reliable sources indicate that police forces opened fire and shot some of the bikers to prevent them from continuing the violence. It will be important, as time goes by, to determine who was killed by whom in the violence among the bikers, and who was killed by the Waco Police and other
542:
After watching the May 18 afternoon press conference via the local Waco channel, the number of people taken into initial custody at the police department was 192. That number has been reduced to 170 and those 170 are the ones that are being charged with organized crime in addition to other crimes
518:
of the groups, the
Bandidos, has been reported as a significant gang threat, but the others are progressively more obscure and may include just about any group with a word on the back of its jacket and someone in cuffs seen by a reporter. We'll need better proof than the incidental word choice in
1494:
My intention was to make it easier for people to find the article through search engines. I noticed that a large number of reliable sources use the word "biker", often in headlines. But I am not strongly wedded to the change. If participating editors oppose the change, please feel free to move it
1094:
There has been recent edit warring to insert a "pro-biker" POV into the article, both by a registered but now blocked user, and by IP editors. The article must summarize what the full range of current neutral reliable sources say. It should not discriminate between pro-police sources or pro-biker
1099:
a criminal offense in the USA. This article should evolve as new reliable sources emerge. If solid evidence is produced that bikers killed bikers, so be it. If police snipers killed bikers, as reported by reliable sources as time goes by, then we must not hesitate to report and summarize that.
558:
I'm for "club", both because that's what
Knowledge (XXG) already calls them, by article title, and that, charged with a crime that hinges largely on the question of whether the groups are gangs, it's best to give them the presumption of innocence. They've already lost their bikes and many lost
1053:
A Swiss Army knife is not a weapon, even if the police say it is. I realize it's a quote, at least we are given the context to judge their claims, but their categorization of everything and the kitchen sink as weapons is laughable. What's the dividing line between normal use of
English and
1615:
It ends long before we reach that example, I'd say that goes without saying. Exactly where is just editorial judgment, with no necessarily "correct" answer, and editors can never have too many things to argue about. One word, obviously, is the minimum "extra" one could add, and it's all I'm
813:
I didn't remove the thing, I just said secondary sources were better. I know we can use primary sources, but in this case the source could be changed by the owners. Because image of the calendar on the page is some sort of Google widget, it is not archived by the
623:, it's indeed possible that some of the victims were shot by officers, but it also seems clear that a majority of the victims were shot by members of the criminal biker gangs. Do you think we should include this in the article, or wait for more developments?
1933:
Anyway, just readded a "Patrick
Swanton" and replaced "police sources" with "Steve Cook, executive director of the Midwest Outlaw Motorcycle Gang Investigators Association". Seems like a totally different thing when it's not shrouded in mystery, doesn't it?
1325:. Do you consider it a reliable source? On another matter, I see that an IP has been trying to remove the Washington Post eyewitness account. I think it needs to stand for now unless it is impeached by a better reliable source. Thanks to those who reverted.
1054:
repeating police-state propaganda as truth. This bloated and fake number is being used as part of a propaganda campaign to justify the extra-judicial killing of citizens. Are we OK with being at part of that here in the
Knowledge (XXG) community?
1525:
Most search engines push a
Knowledge (XXG) article up very high if the algorithm sees it as directly relevant. I thought adding "biker" might help. I have seen our article dropping in Google searches recently. I am not an expert in SEO, though.
1159:
There is no substantive response needed from me. It would be very unimformed. I have not been editing this page at all. Just trying to keep an eye on it to minimize disruption. Still doing that. You seem to have the situation well in hand.
173:
67:
149:
63:
984:
On 20 May 2015, I added "According to police" to line 64, so that it read "According to police, more than 100 weapons were recovered from the scene of the crime." Someone removed that, saying "I don't think that intro is needed."
1544:
I think it's clear the move has proved more controversial than expected. For my part I don't think the added word necessary or preferred. I was also unaware search engine optimization was part of the WP:NAMING policy.
1252:
which presents the biker view of things. I need to work now, but will add it later if no one else does. The "Aging Rebel" blog, though not a reliable source itself, is following the story closely and is worth reading.
1308:
for them to say who shot whom. But while facts may be conspicuous by their absense, and people judged by their silence, the only actual truth to the matter is that many facts are absent and many people are silent.
784:
their own critical evaluation of the organization. I ask all editors, on every article, PLEASE stop destroying primary sources just in order to be obstructive. There is no better source than the horse's mouth!
1595:
Years are good. The Ebola title works for now, but if another outbreak happens in the region some other year, it won't. I'd also disagree with "virus" there. The disease was the problem. But that doesn't matter
2024:
988:
While I may personally believe the police are likely telling the truth about this, the addition seemed to me to be a more neutral POV, as well as making clear that the police are the source of the information.
1929:
My old town's guy was my cousin. I'll withhold his name simply for my own privacy, but he's featured in quite a few papers, too. I could have probably pulled some corrupt stuff, but the opportunity never came
1451:
What the police reported the next day has been different from what they initially reported, a few times already. Not much different, in that respect, from the first Waco. Note how the wrinkles and holes in
130:
964:; the longer quote is "On Monday, police snipers perched on the restaurant’s roof as officers in tactical gear and armed with assault rifles guarded the outer perimeter of the yellow crime scene tape."
514:. If we have a free choice between "gang" and "club" we're supposed to recognize that we need solid evidence to suggest a criminal role for a club whose members might insist they are not outlaws.
853:
OK - I have no objection to using lots of secondary sources, and I even understand that sometimes it takes a mention by a secondary source in order to be sure a primary source is real or relevant.
95:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1007:
If you look at the current article, you'll see that the sentence in question has evolved to "The police said they recovered about 320 weapons from the crime scene". What's to "change back"? ―
2234:
96:
2259:
1049:"Spokesman Patrick Swanton said police recovered about 320 weapons from the crime scene. Swiss army knives, pocket knives, handguns, and an AK-47 style rifle were among the weapons found.
352:
1838:
with someone who just happened to witness or get hit by something. "Swanton" is more concise and precise than "a police spokesman" or even "the police". Definitely better than a spokes
1224:
823:
had family arrested say it was a Texas
Confederation of Clubs and Independents meeting. We have this primary source we can look at now to verify it because we are concerned with the
2209:
154:
1830:
But inside this story, he pops up a lot. He's basically the face of the whole department. Given that, I think his name is significant here, and there's no BLP worries with a man
1812:
you will never hear of again who was just a mouthpiece. I do not think it contributes to a clear and concise article. What is the
Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidance on this?
1075:
No, repeating ridiculous claims just because someone said them, when they are agit-prop designed to cover up the murder of a minority group, is not OK. I agree with the above.
369:
91:
58:
2093:
I just read through this thing to educate myself, and the bias toward the biker club point of view just drips off this. Are you kidding me that nobody has tagged this before
559:
friends, best not to also be prejudged by Knowledge (XXG), just because the media, cops and courts also have. It's a stylistic choice, and we're only meant to reflect the
467:
Gang or club? Is there a legal distinction for gang? Is "gang" neutral? The police call these folks a "gang", but they call themselves a "club" - so which should we use?
1197:
Breaking events articles are a bear. An admin I am aquainted with was up for 56 straight hours right after Sandy Hook happened, trying to keep order in that article.
405:
2224:
604:
Local news had their live truck down there during the presser. Seems people are going to wait until the autopsies are done to figure out where the bullets came from.
178:
932:'On Monday, President Barack Obama announced a new executive order aimed at making sure that situation -- more often associated with Palestine ..doesn’t happen again'
582:
law enforcement agencies. Also important to present in the article as more in-depth coverage emerges is the role of the "Twin Peaks" restaurant management. Did this
2204:
1690:
even though there several exchanges of fire between two students and the police; neither did we decide to title an article about the events of November 5, 2009 as
1031:
I didn't see that. Oddly, the original version was displayed for me yesterday, which is why I brought it up. So no worries, problem solved as far as I am concerned
2254:
2199:
395:
120:
728:
It looks like all the bikers were there because a biker rights organization was having a regional meeting at the restaurant. It's on their calendar for the day.
359:
1600:
2229:
2148:
Indictments are being superseeded, the first trial is about to start, but you wouldn't know it from this article, which is out of date by over a year now.
2051:
I saw a brief snippet of it on the Dallas TV news when they covered the biker rally in support of the bikers still in jail and they used the word dragnet.
2279:
1304:
Particular to this case, we know there were many cops already parked outside the restaurant, simply because bikers were there. And we know it's taking an
364:
1513:
Wouldn't making it more similar to the news headlines make it more likely to get lost in the mix? Or am I missing something about search optimization?
2219:
1220:
267:
1178:. I appreciate your response and hope you will still keep an eye on it, as I need to both sleep and work. This is a work in progress. Thanks again.
1223:. A quick search doesn't find much reliable which states police were the aggressors. I'd be willing to read presented sources which say otherwise.
2249:
2194:
2070:, and a famous one, but I don't think many people who've heard of it have ever watched a whole episode. Maybe some clues in there (or something).
2269:
2244:
445:
257:
1947:
1298:
335:
290:
961:
refers to Ferguson; the Waco shootout is actually cited as a counter-example in the other direction. The quote about the snipers comes from
1721:
I disagree that the word implies responsibility, but I guess what matters is that some readers might interpret it that way. So I say back. ―
1997:
There is new coverage by the New York Times and the Texas Tribune today too. I am at work now but will add some new material this evening.
909:
Correct number is 9 as per most recent info from the police and news. 8 died at the scene and 1 was taken to the hospital where he died.
543:
such as parole violations or outstanding warrants. As for club vs gang, the police spokesman, Sgt. Patrick Swanton used the term gang.
1648:
Okie dokie. I also want to be clear, I haven't addressed "we still don't know how much of this was a police shootout", only WP:PRECISE. ―
1305:
2274:
2108:
Please identify specific examples of pro-biker bias. The article summarizes what mainstream media sources have said about the incident.
1568:
942:
736:
233:
2094:
2020:
347:
959:
2214:
2155:
1076:
1061:
735:
So it was, I guess, supposed to be a friendly business meeting, not a party, and certainly not a criminal event or a confrontation.
696:
620:
1476:
Usually, titles should be precise enough to unambiguously define the topical scope of the article, but no more precise than that.
1249:
343:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
1297:
Not particular to this case, but in an all-encompassing way, police bringing the fight to organized crime (real or imagined) is
2264:
2239:
1773:
I agree with the move back to the earlier title at this time. After careful thought and consideration of the input of others,
33:
1745:
Given the name change was made boldly (ie without gaining consensus first), but has been contested, it should be moved back.
1687:
628:
440:
295:
224:
201:
1992:
637:
The outside range on the number claimed to be shot by police is from one to all of the dead, with 4-5 being most repeated.
1219:, using nothing approximating a source. I'd be interested in mustering minority media views so long as the sources meet
1686:
make that assessment. Excuse the substandard comparisons which follow: We don't call the events of April 20, 1999 the
1878:
1481:
Plus, we still don't know how much of this was a police shootout. The old, concise title doesn't presume either way.
2175:
1817:
1764:
1750:
1572:
1564:
1364:
1202:
1165:
1124:
832:
759:
670:
487:
2016:
2056:
1954:
1920:
914:
819:
705:
624:
609:
548:
2126:
I removed the POV template. It's been 2 years since it was added and I'm not seeing any pro-biker bias, really.
1831:
1227:, while not reliable, presents a side of the story not appearing in the news media yet. If you've got sources,
39:
928:
Ukraine mydiesn style shooting? There is report "On Monday, police snipers perched on the restaurant's roof"
740:
2098:
1691:
1474:
I see we've gained a word. I don't see the need. If there was another shootout in Waco in 2015, sure. But, "
946:
2151:
1057:
938:
2074:
1967:
1938:
1898:
1850:
1712:
1640:
1607:
1517:
1485:
1460:
1384:
1377:
1313:
732:
It's also on the calendar of a Waco area bikers Union website, UCOW, which lists the Bandidos as members.
567:
2171:
2159:
1813:
1774:
1760:
1746:
1198:
1175:
1161:
1138:
1120:
1080:
1065:
885:
828:
774:
755:
666:
483:
232:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2052:
1950:
1916:
1036:
997:
910:
701:
605:
544:
327:
1835:
1560:
1475:
751:
21:
2114:
2003:
1783:
1532:
1501:
1438:
1331:
1259:
1184:
1147:
1106:
592:
2037:
1803:"The police said" vs "A police spokesmen said" vs "police sergeant Patrick Swanton said" vs .....
1731:
1658:
1626:
1585:
1137:
response, based on the very real content issues, as opposed to just reaching for the block tool,
1017:
501:
472:
311:
284:
1843:
2131:
2071:
1964:
1935:
1895:
1847:
1709:
1699:
1637:
1604:
1550:
1514:
1482:
1457:
1400:
1381:
1374:
1322:
1310:
1236:
899:
695:
Info is slowly coming out and more than 8,800 pages of evidence for the grand jury to review.
656:
564:
824:
1571:. If that were the only virus epidemic in West Africa, would we feel the need to move it to
815:
642:
523:
times how many were arrested by police - is it 150, 192, 170 ... or are we still counting?)
511:
1032:
993:
882:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2015_Waco_shootout&diff=prev&oldid=662980363
139:
1993:
http://www.aclutx.org/2015/06/07/statement-on-dragnet-arrests-jailing-of-bikers-in-waco/
1456:
persist, 22 years later. This article will be a work in progress for quite a while yet.
1392:
1355:
for all three. I've seen Yahoo! News corrections, but have tried numerous times to make
2109:
1998:
1778:
1527:
1496:
1433:
1370:
1326:
1254:
1228:
1179:
1142:
1101:
700:
was lunch time on a Tuesday but the sights were bleh at best. Thought I would share.
587:
750:
Somebody did put the link to the calendar in the article, which is a mistake. It is a
216:
195:
2188:
2028:
1722:
1649:
1617:
1576:
1301:
Exceedingly more common than either organized crime fighting police or within itself.
1008:
969:
858:
789:
528:
497:
468:
340:
1874:
1863:
2127:
1695:
1546:
1429:
1396:
1360:
1245:
1232:
895:
583:
432:
1119:
Have requested a hardblock on the blocked editor at ANI. Perhaps that will help.
1991:
This is a primary source, but we should look for secondary sources covering it.
1344:
638:
414:
163:
1894:
I guess what I'm trying to say is he's definitely the public arm of Waco law.
1453:
1211:
My edits in this subject matter have been few and minor. I was the fellow who
422:
317:
754:
source. There are secondary sources that mention it that are better to use.
2179:
2163:
2135:
2121:
2102:
2077:
2060:
2042:
2010:
1970:
1958:
1941:
1924:
1901:
1853:
1821:
1790:
1768:
1754:
1736:
1715:
1703:
1663:
1643:
1631:
1610:
1590:
1554:
1539:
1520:
1508:
1488:
1463:
1445:
1404:
1387:
1338:
1316:
1266:
1240:
1206:
1191:
1169:
1154:
1141:? Is that too much to ask, given that nine people are dead and ~170 jailed?
1128:
1113:
1084:
1069:
1040:
1022:
1001:
973:
950:
918:
903:
862:
836:
793:
763:
744:
709:
674:
660:
646:
632:
613:
599:
570:
552:
532:
505:
491:
476:
1915:
basis. My favorite is Trooper Guy Gill with the Washington State Patrol.
1351:
included), they value volume and speed over accuracy, but at least seem to
962:
339:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
1946:
A slight up on Sgt. W. Patrick Swanton, looks like he is going to run for
1603:? Some info is best suited for the lead, unless disambiguation is needed.
619:
Yo, Cullen, I think I've got your answer for you man :). According to the
519:
one or two rushed articles. (Rushed enough that ABC has revised at least
992:
I am interested in more community input on this, before I change it back.
965:
854:
808:
785:
524:
2067:
1777:, I agree that "biker" in the title implies something I did not intend.
1601:
May 2015 Waco, Texas resturant biker and police shootout and mass arrest
1343:
Yeah, they're legit, at least by online news outlet standards, at least
2019:, the next latest being June 7, and that wasn't about ACLU. Except for
729:
1575:? I don't see a problem with an "extra" word for descriptive value. ―
586:
company fail to act to prevent expected violence at their premises?
654:
is one of the sites saying police shooters killed all nine people.-
651:
229:
83:
52:
15:
1842:. We should attribute quotes in encyclopedias. "Sources say"
2027:
shows nothing secondary at this time, as far as I can see. ―
413:
162:
138:
1828:
We'll probably never hear of him again, outside this story.
482:
That'd be a simple one. We use the term the sources use.
1563:. I entered "2014" in the search box and randomly chose
105:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
2144:
Article has not been updated for a year, needs updates.
1808:
1216:
1212:
881:
510:
I don't think it's necessarily that simple, because of
228:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2235:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
1867:have been so wrong to just give a two-year-old a
108:Template:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
2260:C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
875:10 deaths in Infobox conflicts with article text
2210:Low-importance Serial killer-related articles
8:
1599:Description is good, but where does it end?
1688:1999 Columbine High school student shooting
2149:
1055:
936:
279:
190:
47:
2170:Well help yourself. It is not protected.
665:Yea like we could use that for a source.
380:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
1636:And I'll suggest zero is less than one.
958:The quote about the new executive order
92:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
2225:Low-importance Organized crime articles
1963:He's got my (worthless Canadian) vote!
1881:shooting. Apparently, people who drive
1559:I think it's possible to overinterpret
1369:Don't let their other shit, especially
281:
192:
49:
19:
2205:C-Class Serial killer-related articles
1363:Doink the Clown left the WWF in 1996.
2255:Low-importance United States articles
2200:Low-importance Crime-related articles
1215:on the registered editor last night.
890:Hopefully someone can clear that up.
7:
827:, but we cite the secondary source.
333:This article is within the scope of
222:This article is within the scope of
89:This article is within the scope of
2230:Organized crime task force articles
1569:Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa
730:http://txcocinews.org/calendar.html
38:It is of interest to the following
2280:WikiProject United States articles
383:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
242:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Death
2220:C-Class Organized crime articles
2089:Heavy biker bias to this article
1306:increasingly unusually long time
425:
320:
310:
283:
215:
194:
82:
51:
20:
1321:I have never cited Yahoo News,
1221:WP:Identifying Reliable Sources
400:This article has been rated as
262:This article has been rated as
125:This article has been rated as
64:Serial, mass, and spree killers
2250:C-Class United States articles
2195:C-Class Crime-related articles
1959:23:00, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
1299:routine enough to seem boring.
710:22:51, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
174:the Organized crime task force
1:
2270:Low-importance Texas articles
2245:Low-importance Death articles
2017:Latest article at nytimes.com
1573:Virus epidemic in West Africa
1070:21:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
980:"According to Police" Removal
438:This article is supported by
236:and see a list of open tasks.
171:This article is supported by
147:This article is supported by
99:and see a list of open tasks.
1692:2009 Fort Hood Army shooting
1428:I saw the same video today,
1231:, please present them here.
1133:Might you please consider a
150:the Serial Killer task force
102:Crime and Criminal Biography
59:Crime and Criminal Biography
2122:19:36, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
1971:02:36, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
820:this shot from 19 May 2015.
2296:
2275:WikiProject Texas articles
2103:01:47, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
1565:2014 Guinea ebola outbreak
406:project's importance scale
268:project's importance scale
245:Template:WikiProject Death
131:project's importance scale
2136:23:47, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
2078:03:07, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
2061:23:29, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
2043:13:50, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
2011:20:31, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
1942:03:02, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
1925:23:34, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
1380:05:49, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
1217:The editor was soapboxing
697:Police bullets hit bikers
421:
399:
336:WikiProject United States
305:
261:
210:
170:
146:
124:
77:
46:
2215:Serial Killer task force
2180:00:10, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
2164:22:38, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
1902:20:07, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
1854:20:09, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
1822:19:59, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
1791:01:45, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
1769:19:40, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
1755:19:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
1737:18:51, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
1716:17:27, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
1704:14:16, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
1664:13:02, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
1644:13:00, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
1632:12:52, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
1611:12:44, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
1591:03:25, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
1555:03:16, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
1540:21:32, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
1521:20:44, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
1509:20:07, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
1489:19:56, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
1464:12:56, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
1446:01:51, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
1405:15:54, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
1388:05:50, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
1339:05:27, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
1317:05:08, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
1267:16:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1241:11:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1207:07:08, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1192:05:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1170:05:28, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1155:05:22, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1129:05:14, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1114:04:42, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1085:22:20, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
1041:14:44, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
1023:01:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
1002:01:15, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
974:11:42, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
951:04:28, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
919:21:26, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
904:20:51, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
863:19:56, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
837:19:42, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
794:12:53, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
764:21:17, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
745:07:25, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
675:20:47, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
661:20:08, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
652:The Waco Police Massacre
647:03:24, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
633:18:27, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
614:06:56, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
600:04:47, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
571:02:17, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
553:20:51, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
533:18:00, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
506:04:58, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
492:04:34, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
477:04:16, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
341:United States of America
2265:C-Class Texas articles
2240:C-Class Death articles
1877:he is talking about a
1567:, which redirected to
418:
386:United States articles
167:
143:
111:Crime-related articles
28:This article is rated
1357:The Los Angeles Times
563:as they're reported.
417:
166:
142:
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1250:this USA Today story
1213:pushed for the block
935:Bouth Monday 18/5.
625:SilverSurfingSerpant
328:United States portal
1885:like violence, too.
1090:Recent edit warring
354:Articles Requested!
2066:That's apparently
1879:road warrior style
419:
168:
144:
34:content assessment
2166:
2154:comment added by
2080:
1832:paid to be public
1759:I made the move.
1347:. Like the rest (
1072:
1060:comment added by
953:
941:comment added by
884:. The editor was
724:Original research
460:
459:
456:
455:
452:
451:
441:WikiProject Texas
278:
277:
274:
273:
225:WikiProject Death
189:
188:
185:
184:
2287:
2172:Richard-of-Earth
2119:
2117:Let's discuss it
2065:
2040:
2035:
2008:
2006:Let's discuss it
1948:Sheriff in 2016.
1814:Richard-of-Earth
1788:
1786:Let's discuss it
1775:Richard-of-Earth
1761:Richard-of-Earth
1747:Richard-of-Earth
1734:
1729:
1661:
1656:
1629:
1624:
1588:
1583:
1537:
1535:Let's discuss it
1506:
1504:Let's discuss it
1443:
1441:Let's discuss it
1336:
1334:Let's discuss it
1264:
1262:Let's discuss it
1199:John from Idegon
1189:
1187:Let's discuss it
1176:John from Idegon
1162:John from Idegon
1152:
1150:Let's discuss it
1139:John from Idegon
1121:John from Idegon
1111:
1109:Let's discuss it
1020:
1015:
829:Richard-of-Earth
816:Internet Archive
812:
778:
775:Richard-of-Earth
756:Richard-of-Earth
667:John from Idegon
659:
597:
595:Let's discuss it
577:Who killed whom?
484:John from Idegon
435:
430:
429:
428:
388:
387:
384:
381:
378:
330:
325:
324:
323:
314:
307:
306:
301:
298:
287:
280:
250:
249:
246:
243:
240:
219:
212:
211:
206:
198:
191:
113:
112:
109:
106:
103:
86:
79:
78:
73:
70:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
2295:
2294:
2290:
2289:
2288:
2286:
2285:
2284:
2185:
2184:
2146:
2115:
2091:
2068:a solid TV show
2053:Heyyouoverthere
2038:
2029:
2004:
1989:
1951:Heyyouoverthere
1917:Heyyouoverthere
1805:
1784:
1732:
1723:
1659:
1650:
1627:
1618:
1586:
1577:
1533:
1502:
1472:
1439:
1349:Washington Post
1332:
1260:
1248:, I just found
1185:
1148:
1107:
1092:
1018:
1009:
982:
926:
924:snipers on roof
911:Heyyouoverthere
877:
806:
772:
726:
702:Heyyouoverthere
655:
606:Heyyouoverthere
593:
579:
545:Heyyouoverthere
465:
431:
426:
424:
385:
382:
379:
376:
375:
374:
360:Become a Member
326:
321:
319:
299:
293:
247:
244:
241:
238:
237:
204:
110:
107:
104:
101:
100:
71:
68:Organized crime
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
2293:
2291:
2283:
2282:
2277:
2272:
2267:
2262:
2257:
2252:
2247:
2242:
2237:
2232:
2227:
2222:
2217:
2212:
2207:
2202:
2197:
2187:
2186:
2183:
2182:
2145:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2139:
2138:
2090:
2087:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2081:
2046:
2045:
1988:
1987:ACLU statement
1985:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1973:
1931:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1872:
1871:chocolate bar?
1857:
1856:
1846:for the news.
1804:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1740:
1739:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1597:
1471:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1371:Yahoo! Answers
1367:
1302:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1229:User:Cullen328
1091:
1088:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1026:
1025:
981:
978:
977:
976:
955:
954:
933:
925:
922:
908:
893:
876:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
799:
798:
797:
796:
767:
766:
725:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
712:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
578:
575:
574:
573:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
464:
461:
458:
457:
454:
453:
450:
449:
446:Low-importance
437:
436:
420:
410:
409:
402:Low-importance
398:
392:
391:
389:
373:
372:
367:
362:
357:
350:
348:Template Usage
344:
332:
331:
315:
303:
302:
300:Low‑importance
288:
276:
275:
272:
271:
264:Low-importance
260:
254:
253:
251:
248:Death articles
234:the discussion
220:
208:
207:
205:Low‑importance
199:
187:
186:
183:
182:
179:Low-importance
169:
159:
158:
155:Low-importance
145:
135:
134:
127:Low-importance
123:
117:
116:
114:
97:the discussion
87:
75:
74:
72:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2292:
2281:
2278:
2276:
2273:
2271:
2268:
2266:
2263:
2261:
2258:
2256:
2253:
2251:
2248:
2246:
2243:
2241:
2238:
2236:
2233:
2231:
2228:
2226:
2223:
2221:
2218:
2216:
2213:
2211:
2208:
2206:
2203:
2201:
2198:
2196:
2193:
2192:
2190:
2181:
2177:
2173:
2169:
2168:
2167:
2165:
2161:
2157:
2153:
2143:
2137:
2133:
2129:
2125:
2124:
2123:
2120:
2118:
2113:
2112:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2100:
2096:
2088:
2079:
2076:
2073:
2069:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2058:
2054:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2044:
2041:
2036:
2034:
2033:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2009:
2007:
2002:
2001:
1995:
1994:
1986:
1972:
1969:
1966:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1949:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1940:
1937:
1932:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1903:
1900:
1897:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1884:
1880:
1876:
1873:
1870:
1865:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1855:
1852:
1849:
1845:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1829:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1819:
1815:
1810:
1802:
1792:
1789:
1787:
1782:
1781:
1776:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1766:
1762:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1738:
1735:
1730:
1728:
1727:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1714:
1711:
1706:
1705:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1665:
1662:
1657:
1655:
1654:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1642:
1639:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1630:
1625:
1623:
1622:
1616:suggesting. ―
1614:
1613:
1612:
1609:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1589:
1584:
1582:
1581:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1538:
1536:
1531:
1530:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1519:
1516:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1507:
1505:
1500:
1499:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1487:
1484:
1479:
1477:
1469:
1465:
1462:
1459:
1455:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1444:
1442:
1437:
1436:
1431:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1386:
1383:
1379:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1337:
1335:
1330:
1329:
1324:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1315:
1312:
1307:
1303:
1300:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1268:
1265:
1263:
1258:
1257:
1251:
1247:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1190:
1188:
1183:
1182:
1177:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1153:
1151:
1146:
1145:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1112:
1110:
1105:
1104:
1098:
1089:
1087:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1073:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1048:
1047:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1024:
1021:
1016:
1014:
1013:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
999:
995:
990:
986:
979:
975:
971:
967:
963:
960:
957:
956:
952:
948:
944:
943:99.90.196.227
940:
934:
931:
930:
929:
923:
921:
920:
916:
912:
906:
905:
901:
897:
891:
888:
887:
886:Bobby_Iverson
883:
874:
864:
860:
856:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
838:
834:
830:
826:
821:
817:
810:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
795:
791:
787:
782:
776:
771:
770:
769:
768:
765:
761:
757:
753:
749:
748:
747:
746:
742:
738:
737:99.104.111.89
733:
731:
723:
711:
707:
703:
698:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
688:
687:
686:
685:
676:
672:
668:
664:
663:
662:
658:
653:
650:
649:
648:
644:
640:
636:
635:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
617:
616:
615:
611:
607:
602:
601:
598:
596:
591:
590:
585:
576:
572:
569:
566:
562:
557:
556:
555:
554:
550:
546:
534:
530:
526:
522:
517:
513:
509:
508:
507:
503:
499:
495:
494:
493:
489:
485:
481:
480:
479:
478:
474:
470:
463:Gang or club?
462:
447:
444:(assessed as
443:
442:
434:
423:
416:
412:
411:
407:
403:
397:
394:
393:
390:
377:United States
371:
368:
366:
363:
361:
358:
356:
355:
351:
349:
346:
345:
342:
338:
337:
329:
318:
316:
313:
309:
308:
304:
297:
292:
291:United States
289:
286:
282:
269:
265:
259:
256:
255:
252:
235:
231:
227:
226:
221:
218:
214:
213:
209:
203:
200:
197:
193:
180:
177:(assessed as
176:
175:
165:
161:
160:
156:
153:(assessed as
152:
151:
141:
137:
136:
132:
128:
122:
119:
118:
115:
98:
94:
93:
88:
85:
81:
80:
76:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
2150:— Preceding
2147:
2116:
2110:
2095:96.241.40.84
2092:
2072:InedibleHulk
2031:
2030:
2005:
1999:
1996:
1990:
1965:InedibleHulk
1936:InedibleHulk
1896:InedibleHulk
1882:
1869:normal-sized
1868:
1848:InedibleHulk
1839:
1827:
1806:
1785:
1779:
1725:
1724:
1710:InedibleHulk
1707:
1684:
1652:
1651:
1638:InedibleHulk
1620:
1619:
1605:InedibleHulk
1579:
1578:
1534:
1528:
1515:InedibleHulk
1503:
1497:
1483:InedibleHulk
1480:
1473:
1458:InedibleHulk
1440:
1434:
1427:
1382:InedibleHulk
1375:InedibleHulk
1373:, fool you.
1356:
1352:
1348:
1333:
1327:
1323:InedibleHulk
1311:InedibleHulk
1261:
1255:
1186:
1180:
1149:
1143:
1134:
1108:
1102:
1096:
1093:
1074:
1056:— Preceding
1052:
1011:
1010:
991:
987:
983:
937:— Preceding
927:
907:
892:
889:
878:
780:
734:
727:
603:
594:
588:
584:Breastaurant
580:
565:InedibleHulk
560:
541:
520:
515:
466:
439:
433:Texas portal
401:
365:Project Talk
353:
334:
263:
223:
172:
148:
126:
90:
40:WikiProjects
2156:24.22.76.12
2025:"aclu waco"
1708:So...back?
1225:This source
1174:Thank you,
1135:substantive
1077:24.22.76.12
1062:24.22.76.12
880:hospital":
621:latest news
2189:Categories
1862:Wait, no.
1561:WP:PRECISE
1454:that story
1393:This video
1359:not claim
1345:since 2011
1033:Snideology
994:Snideology
752:WP:PRIMARY
779:There is
2152:unsigned
2032:Mandruss
1836:there is
1726:Mandruss
1653:Mandruss
1621:Mandruss
1580:Mandruss
1365:No dice.
1058:unsigned
1012:Mandruss
939:unsigned
498:Rklawton
496:Thanks.
469:Rklawton
2128:eaolson
1834:, like
1696:BusterD
1547:BusterD
1430:BusterD
1397:BusterD
1246:BusterD
1233:BusterD
896:Treeees
894:Thanks
657:gadfium
404:on the
266:on the
129:on the
30:C-class
2111:Cullen
2075:(talk)
2000:Cullen
1968:(talk)
1939:(talk)
1899:(talk)
1851:(talk)
1807:I saw
1780:Cullen
1713:(talk)
1641:(talk)
1608:(talk)
1529:Cullen
1518:(talk)
1498:Cullen
1495:back.
1486:(talk)
1470:Title?
1461:(talk)
1435:Cullen
1385:(talk)
1378:(talk)
1328:Cullen
1314:(talk)
1256:Cullen
1181:Cullen
1144:Cullen
1103:Cullen
818:. See
781:no ban
639:Rhoark
589:Cullen
568:(talk)
512:WP:BLP
370:Alerts
36:scale.
1596:here.
825:truth
561:facts
521:three
296:Texas
239:Death
230:Death
202:Death
2176:talk
2160:talk
2132:talk
2099:talk
2057:talk
2021:this
1955:talk
1921:talk
1883:cars
1875:Here
1864:Here
1818:talk
1809:this
1765:talk
1751:talk
1700:talk
1551:talk
1401:talk
1361:this
1237:talk
1203:talk
1166:talk
1125:talk
1081:talk
1066:talk
1037:talk
998:talk
970:talk
947:talk
915:talk
900:talk
859:talk
833:talk
790:talk
760:talk
741:talk
706:talk
671:talk
643:talk
629:talk
610:talk
549:talk
529:talk
502:talk
488:talk
473:talk
1930:up.
1840:men
1353:try
1097:yet
966:Wnt
855:Wnt
809:Wnt
786:Wnt
525:Wnt
516:One
396:Low
258:Low
121:Low
2191::
2178:)
2162:)
2134:)
2101:)
2059:)
2023:,
1957:)
1923:)
1844:is
1820:)
1767:)
1753:)
1702:)
1553:)
1478:"
1403:)
1239:)
1205:)
1168:)
1127:)
1083:)
1068:)
1039:)
1000:)
972:)
949:)
917:)
902:)
861:)
835:)
792:)
762:)
743:)
708:)
673:)
645:)
631:)
612:)
551:)
531:)
504:)
490:)
475:)
448:).
294::
181:).
157:).
66:/
62::
2174:(
2158:(
2130:(
2097:(
2055:(
2039:☎
1953:(
1919:(
1816:(
1763:(
1749:(
1733:☎
1698:(
1660:☎
1628:☎
1587:☎
1549:(
1399:(
1235:(
1201:(
1164:(
1123:(
1079:(
1064:(
1035:(
1019:☎
996:(
968:(
945:(
913:(
898:(
857:(
831:(
811::
807:@
788:(
777::
773:@
758:(
739:(
704:(
669:(
641:(
627:(
608:(
547:(
527:(
500:(
486:(
471:(
408:.
270:.
133:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
