Talk:2016 U.S.–Iran naval incident

1645:

case of the chief of staff for example, no matter who the chief of staff is or who the supreme leader is, he is serving at that rank at the supreme leader's pleasure and because the supreme leader appointed him at that position, so, predictably, any chief of staff will want to impress the supreme leader. Every time a chief of staff speaks he will try try to prove how great the supreme leader was for appointing him chief of staff and what a great chief of staff he is, so that he can advance his career by remaining on his post as long as possible and perhaps even increase his chances of becoming Minister of Defence in the future. Any chief of staff's comments, regarding their enemy, are therefore, both predictable and propagandistic in nature. Quoting the current chief of staff:

2191:: This text and image were originally at the end of a very long and imbalanced Reactions section. Given the size of the section now, there won't be room for two photos in the Iranian subsection, and it doesn't belong in the American subsection. As for the text, the five sources above paint a very different picture from the original demonstrations text, since three of the five seem to dwell on embarrassment in Iranian social media that these simulations were presented, while the other two just talk about the simulations. To reflect the information in the five sources noted, which I'm assuming is a representative selection, a very different reaction sentence or two would need to be written for it to be neutral. 1277:

they will be returned very shortly. We have to mention this fact, that Kerry "threatened"(for lack of a better word) Zarif with dire consequences if they did not release soldiers. As we do not know the exact words used (He may have said "You do not go around taking Uncle Sams's soldiers hostage prepare to be nuked back to the stone age" but we do not know that) we are left with nuances such as saying made him aware what the consequences would be etc. So if you are going to remove the quotes and "tidy up, you will need to get the meaning through that Kerry basically threatened the poor guy so much that he called back within 20 minutes.

387: 1480:. This type of behaviour stretches AGF to its limits. There is no encyclopædic value in the predictable, COI, self-serving, career-advancing, pronouncements of middle-ranking Iranian military officials which make this article read like a propaganda leaflet issued by the armed forces of Iran. But it was my fault. Given my past exchanges with you on this subject I shouldn't have bothered replying. And no, you don't make this article NPOV by adding more POV from the opposing forces. In any case, that's my last comment on this article. I have a strong sense that no amount of reasonable proposals can 937:) also hints that you are wrong. So, we have no doubt that multiple phone calls were exchanged between the two minsters. I am not making any ad hom comments on your person , just saying that you are incapable of exploring the sources. The sources does not say that only Kerry made calls, but instead of removing the whole sentence you should have simply edited the sentence to express that. Yes, Kerry was worried, "he was concerned “first and foremost…with the safety and security of the people who were caught up in this incident, the American sailors.” 2646:, that "direct statement" shows nothing special as it's said "that there would be the risk of escalation and the spillover of this issue into other issues, including, no doubt, the nuclear situation," and Kerry was concerned about this according to a US senior State Department official. All in all, we really don't need to repeat it in the lead. I'd like also to add that Kerry said other things in his calls such as "if we are able to do this in the right way, we can make this into what will be a good story for both of us," and one may refer to 2331:"chronological" measn that we tell things as they happened. John Kerry called the Iranian guy and told him that he will nuke the hell out of Iran if Iran does not release the sailors. The Iranian guy was so afraid he called back 20 mins later (after an understandable bathroom break and cloth change) saying that the sailors were ok. Kerry then drove the point home with more phone calls. This should be written as it happened, the calls were not exchanged AFTER the sailors were released. Thus the chrono(time) logical order. 2490:, it is frankly up to you to—in a section labeled "Reaction" of all places—to have that bullet point reflect the five sources you gave while arguing your case, some of which had highly negative reactions to those displays. To restore the bullet without making the necessary changes first is unfortunate. I think it's your responsibility to update the bullet text accordingly, but as the whole article still retains a neutrality template, at least the reader is properly warned, in the interim, that there are NPOV issues. 1793:: Just wait, Dolabi was there inside the event! Why should we remove him? Now, what do you think about having McCain's comment? However, I agree with having a single bullet for Khamenei and that having separate bullets are not necessary. Moreover we should shorten his quotes. Finally, I fully disagree with removing "teenagers bullet plus associated picture" as it is fully related to reaction section showing reaction of Iranian people. It would also be worthy of mentioning if American had made protests. 442: 415: 371: 452: 2174:. the content under dispute is clearly not a news story, but related to the larger event being described. The question is, given the coverage this particular sub-incident has received relative to the rest of the content in the article, is it appropriate to devote a paragraph and an image to it? In my judgement, yes, it is. Others may, of course, disagree, but they would have to explain why the volume of coverage does not justify inclusion. 1730:

Even if Firouzabadi were not deemed inappropriate, there can be no reason for retaining Salami and Dolabi. Further, I don't see any reason for putting Khamenei's various statements and reactions into multiple bullets rather than in a single, streamlined section. Finally, the teenagers bullet plus associated picture have no business in the article. (Nor, for that matter, would be an American protest over the matter, if one had occurred.)

545: 2507:: َAlthough I believe that the section has to be balanced per sources we got (that's why I pinged you), I think "to restore the bullet without making the necessary changes first is not unfortunate" and it's not my "responsibility" to do that. I also think that removing them for the sake of " having no business in the article" is much more unfortunate, isn't it? Anyway, I agree with you that it needs a POV template. 355: 240: 74: 53: 84: 22: 312: 301: 290: 268: 198: 166: 1150:" (or sth like this) is preferable over a detailed version. On the "politicians" issue; I have discussed it in my earlier comments. The source suggests that Republicans criticized the incident (and does not comment on other politicians), while you insist to misinterpret the source by saying that "some politicians" did it. 626:

ranting op ed 2) the boats were released after 18 hours entirely intact after a diplomatic exchange and its not disputed that they had blundered into Iranian waters (where Iran had the legal right to stop them and take them into custody), so they were "held" or similar. If they were "seized" Iran would still have them.

279: 1729:

I have just tagged the article with the POV template, something that should have been done a while ago, since the problems have persisted. In addition to those issues noted above, the excessive use of the "hands behind their heads" phrase (four times in the article for a single event) is another one.

824:

That wording in the NY Times story says were returned to the control of the US government, not to the United States. These small craft can't sail long distances, or in the open ocean. The Washington Post stated that the boats were eventually docked in Bahrain (which is the main base of the US Navy in

736:

I understand the argument but Centcom did not say 'Just' two SIM cards were removed, as they clearly left room open for the removal of other equipment, such as navigation equipment like GPS and RADAR devices. If you would like to use the term 'Just' to describe equipment removal, it would be accurate

2536:

I think you did not get the point. I don't reject the POV issue, yes it has to be resolved. My major issue is with your former biased approach toward the article which has changed now after the RFC proved that you were clearly wrong. It was clearly encyclopedic! you dismissed that, why? Anyway, as I

2521:

That you are unwilling to edit a bullet point you yourself created back on February 16 so it neutrally reflects the many sources you provided in your argument that it should be kept tells its own story. If you aren't capable of writing a balanced bullet point from the sources you yourself find, then

2371:

between the timeline. It disturbs the order. The republicans did not talk/comment on this until AFTER the phone calls had been exchanged, thus we should mention them AFTER the exchange, plus the second sentence also throws an ambiguous light as to whether the sailors were ashore when he called first

1429:

I think the Iran section can be greatly improved if the first three statements by the relatively lower-ranking officials Salami, Dolabi and Firouzabadi, are removed. They are propagandistic in nature and not encyclopædic. They are also quite predictable. Do we really expect army or navy officers to

625:

1) Basic English and common sense: if two boats full of heavily armed sailors from an unfriendly country sail into your waters that's part of how you arrest them (eg, to hold them in position after confirming you've found their guns). It's not "submission", and the source you provided for that was a

1644:

I fully agree with what BlueMoonset said. I wasn't going to comment further since this discussion is a clear waste of time. But you keep insisting that the comments of the military are notable. This is not the case. Predictability and COI exist independently of how high the military rank is. In the

1276:

if you do not understand even common English slang you only have to ask you know. Let me rephrase. John Kerry told Zarif what would happen if the soldiers were not released this was done in a tone so strong that withing 20 minutes Zarif was calling back saying that not only were the soldiers all ok

1682:

You're just misinterpreting the policies! Kerry has an opinion, well! Firouzabadi has an opinion, no problem! We really don't care (and are not sure) why people make comments. I think Firouzabadi never makes comments for the pleasure of supreme leader to become a Minister, he's already the second

2244:

Thanks for the suggestion, but we know that "changing the form" is sth and "wanting the whole issue out of article" is something else. The proper way for dealing with the original form was not to remove it totally (what you suggested!). You could simply refer to the POV issue which is acceptable.

1342:

no. The text adds due weight to the lead showing that the US minister had the upper hand and did not just politely request or beg. therefore it should stay. Why do u want to remove it? Try not to ping people who you think will take ur side, next time you misbehave like this (I have already told u

1103:

I did not mean that sentence at all (which could be resolved via a simple copy edit). My emphasis was on the importance of mentioning the phone calls exchanged between the two minister which you insist to remove and is backed by multiple RSs. There's another point on the "politicians" issue and I

674:

This is while the january 29 Fars statement were already in the article and was not removed, so "adding it back" is nonsense, just like your accusing me of "destructive editing". I just fixed the "damaged lead" while keeping the added materials by other editors. By the way, "The statement did not

2398:

section in both versions and is after every thing else. The only difference is that I have took the details to the body of the article, what is exactly in accordance with the manual of style. Also, I think you have misunderstood the story; Non of the sentences suggests how many calls kerry made,

889:

gives the sense that John Kerry was worried and he hastily made many phone calls, which of course is not the case. John Kerry made one call, and the Iranians released the sailors. I am not making any ad hom comments on your person , just saying that you are incapable of understanding this.

1141:

Much more improvements are seen after your edit. Although I've got some points; The "phone call" issue is presented in details which is not usually accepted when it come to "lead", so I think my version which was "multiple phone calls were exchanged between U.S. Secretary of State

2110:

encyclopedia. People searching for information about the subject should be afforded every opportunity to locate such information without having to search other sources. Always: More information is better than less provided the information is backed with references and citations.

1890:

it does make it acceptable as everyone except you now agrees with my edit. You are the one going against consensus now. For your kind information consensus does not mean that we have to make you agree with us it means that we (the other editors) have looked at the policy at

1769:: "Using too many quotes is incompatible with the encyclopedic writing style." and "Do not insert any number of quotations in a stand-alone quote section." I think the reactions section, especially the section dealing with Iran, does not conform to these rules. Also per 1454:. I think they are notable enough and we can have their viewpoints here. How about removing Kerry's viewpoint because of having COI to advance his career. However, I suggest to add the viewpoints of the other side's high-rank officials to have it balanced, if you like. 1126:

I have added more info about the phone calls. I had already mentioned the phone calls to be frank. Anyway, meh to that. Secondly what exactly is the problem with the politicians? Compare the two sentences and then show me how the meaning has changed with my wording.

1678:'s rank is far higher than minister of defense! for the Nth time, he's the second one! No policy prohibits us from using the comments from those who have COI. If it was so, we had to remove the comments by US side who naturally have their own predictable COI. 1649:

This kind of predictable, career-advancing, propaganda has no place in an article. In any case, this is my last comment on this matter. I intend not to waste any more time on this issue. I have said what I wanted to say and I don't have any illusions that

554: 425: 737:

to say that 'of the communications equipment, just two SIM cards were removed, but it would not be accurate to say 'Just' two SIM cards were removed as it implies Centcom accounted for all other categories of equipment in their inventory.

2393:

does not put the mentioned sentence between any timelines. It's right there after the "exchange of the phone calls". Can you see that? The mentioned sentence (Some Republican presidential hopefuls...) is located at the very end of the

1088:

has stated that he raised the issue immediately with the Iranians and "made it crystal clear how serious this was. It was imperative to get it resolved." is grammatically wrong. And John kerry's involvement has been mentioned already.

1550:

Sorry, Mhhossein, but it is unrealistic to expect an answer for a nonsensical suggestion that Kerry's statements were "career-advancing" when his appointment as Secretary of State is as high as he will ever be in the U.S. Government.

1430:

declare that their enemy did not get taught a lesson or that they are not cowards? These people have a COI to advance their careers by making such statements. It's quite UNDUE and POV to include this type of stuff in an encyclopædia.

2522:

you're going to continue to run into neutrality problems on articles that you contribute to, including those (like this one) that you bring to DYK or other places. No need to ping me further; I've spent enough time on this article.

2472:: Per the clear consensus formed above, I restored the bullet point regarding the "Simulation of the arrest". I saw that you are willing to add some points you have it balanced and would like to ask you discuss your points here. 378: 180: 1913:

Definitely, you edited based on "vacuum", not consensus. Those "every one" were just 2 users against me. For example, they never said why the pic of simulation had to be removed, while I believe it's absolutely relevant.

1520:" a "middle-ranking Iranian military official" made me think that you are trying to just remove them. Also, you did not answer why you think Kerry's viewpoints are not "predictable, COI, self-serving, career-advancing"? 2311:

had disrupted chronological order of the events. You should explain here what you mean exactly, or your reverts are counted as vandalism and/or disruption. I believe that my version had no such problems you alleged.

2056: 362: 176: 877:

I reverted you because you cannot understand English and are therefore incapable of understanding English sources. You are also incapable of understanding the nuances in the English of this article. The sentence

1932:

you may believe anything you want here you must prove that it adds encyclopedic knowledge to the article, then add it. 4 users are editing the article three are against your edits tell you something doesn't it?

952:. The source suggests that Republicans criticized the incident (and makes no comment about other politicians), while you insist to misinterpret the source by saying that "some politicians" did it. By the way, 394: 184: 640:

Thanks for your explanation. I can admit that in a "submission position" can be removed because of being part of an Open-Ed. But if we are to act based on the sources, we should write "seized" not "held".

2643: 1365:

So, avoid restoring this disputed content unless you've built a clear consensus here. Btw, my pinging was of course called an 'appropriate notification' and feel free to report me when ever you can. --

938: 1212:

we need to mention the fact that Kerry told Zarif that he will have his arse on a silver platter if these soldiers are not released. Incorporate that in your text and lets see what you come up with.

996:

as I said before, if you are unable to grasp simple English, feel free to ping someone who does. You can also seek a third opinion, request DRN etc. Again I would like to point out that the sentence

2846: 957: 2230:

Well, no. I still don't believe was appropriate in its original form. If it does get inserted again, however, it clearly can't be written as it was given the sourcing you've provided above.

1683:

one! He makes comments based on his own beliefs. Even if we suppose Kerry's comments are "carrier advancing", we can't remove his notable comments, simply because he is a notable person. --

756:: I see your point and I appreciate your precise viewpoint. I thought that GPS and RADAR will be counted as communication devices. Anyway, I have no objection against removing 'Just', now. 2836: 482: 2345:

Based on the sources Kerry called within five minutes and they at least had 5 phone calls. What part of my version suggested that "calls were exchanged after the sailors were released"?

2841: 858:'s multiple phone calls" in the lead. Moreover, the source makes no comments about "some politicians" rather it says that Some Republicans have made criticisms. Why did you revert me? 2372:

then made five more calls or he called when he got the news and made five more calls. So to make everything clear, we should just mention his calls and then the trump shenanigans.

920:"Secretary of State John Kerry spoke to his Iranian counterpart, Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, at least five times Tuesday while U.S. Navy sailors were in Iranian custody." 2621:

Should the lead include the text that when Kerry called the Iranian he "gave him a very direct statement about what would happen" if the sailors were not released quickly, as per

499: 1899:

you need to prove something belongs in an article before you put it in. so basically you cannot put back the text you inserted until you explain its relevance here on the TP.

253: 210: 2811: 2431:") you'll need to completely recuse yourself from any further editing on this article. The WP Talk section is not the appropriate place to organize a Flag Day celebration. 1647:"This incident in the Persian Gulf, which probably will not be the American forces' last mistake in the region, should be a lesson to troublemakers in the U.S. Congress." 1379:

It is not my POV, it is what has been reported. Anyway I wash my hands off of this stuff. I'll just open an RFC later on, lets have the other editors give their opinion.

2071:

later claiming that they were not encyclopedic. Now, should the info + pic of that event be removed or do you think they are notable enough and we have to mention them?

854:

I did not make the page, and it has even nothing to do with editing the article. Anyway, how the sailors were released is absolutely important so we have to say about "

535: 2806: 239: 2831: 2035:

On the 38th anniversary day of Islamic revolution of Iran, Iranian people reacted to the capture of 10 US sailors by simulating the scene, in some cities such as

525: 911:, is fundamentally wrong. It is a very bizarre statement! Let me make a similar judgement about you; You can't understand English well, because according to the 489: 2801: 1311: 1032:, I can hear you! By the way, I changed the sentence to "...multiple phone calls were exchanged between..." which is exactly in accordance with the sources. 826: 1947:

No problem, not all users have same viewpoints. My problem is your not respecting others' points. Anyway, there are other ways of dealing with such issues.

2851: 1598:'s comments had been "career-advancing". FYI, Firouzabadi is ranked just after Iran supreme leader, khamenei. In fact, he is the highest-ranking member of 1244:

click the article page, read the lead and see that the quotes from Kerry are well sourced. How can you demand sources when they have already been given?.

494: 2821: 2796: 2791: 715:

weapons, ammunition and communication gear are accounted for minus two SIM cards that appear to have been removed from two handheld satellite phones."

2429:"The Iranian guy was so afraid he called back 20 mins later (after an understandable bathroom break and cloth change) saying that the sailors were ok 2399:

rather we're only talking about the number of phone calls being exchanged between them (at least five based on the sources). So, this is a fact that

702: 205: 171: 2647: 1773:: "Overuse happens when: quotes are used to explain a point that can also be paraphrased the quotes dominate the article" which is the case here. 148: 2826: 2816: 1104:

think the current status (which is your version) is misinterpretation of the source from grammatical point of view. I doubt if you really read my

2132:

Notable enough an well sourced. There's nothing POV in covering the fact that Iran is taking every bit of the propaganda value of this incident.

465: 420: 2781: 2064: 214: 138: 2705: 106: 928:"Kerry, who exchanged at least five telephone calls Tuesday with Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif while the sailors were being held..." 1895:

and made a decision about the article. If you want to change that decision you are the one who will have to explain your edits. As per

2786: 477: 1856:

Thank you FreeatlastChitchat for taking the time to improve the section. It is much more focused and encyclopedic now. Best regards.

789:

were exactly "returned to the United States" (did you even pay attention to that?). You've surprisingly written in your edit summary

110: 935: 706: 602: 2537:

said, I agree that other viewpoints has to be reflected here. Of course, I'm able to reflect the sources and you are able too. --

2048: 1178: 1082: 473:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

386: 2060: 33: 2776: 2616:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2030:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2744:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2666:

It is 'tough talking' but very unclear as to its meaning. I'm not even sure that the 'critics' deserve to be in the lead.

2289:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1446:

They are properly attributed and their COI has nothing to with reflecting their viewpoint. I think this is a proposal for

114: 2043:. They did it in a variety of styles using teenagers and older men. The incident was covered by multiple sources such as 1476:

Please get real. You ping me presumably for me to give you my advice, then you attack me by throwing at me nonsense like

97: 58: 2629: 2377: 2336: 2094: 1938: 1904: 1840: 1450:

the section. We have to " fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources" per

1384: 1348: 1318:'s tip, instead of committing edit war and pushing unnecessary details into the lead. Your recent inclusion has a clear 1282: 1249: 1217: 1132: 1094: 1012: 895: 2052: 1606:. I don't deem Kerry's comment "carrier advancing" although I'm sure that both parties naturally have their own COI. -- 2730: 794: 599: 709:'. However, I think we have to emphasize that 'Just' two SIM cards were removed, because the Centcom statement says: 1827:

please stop your POV editing. Everyone agrees with toning down the propaganda except you, so I am toning it down. @

975: 2449:: This is just a small part of the story, look at other discussions! By the way, he can't respond your comment. 2149:(nominator): These are absolutely well sourced and encyclopedic information and is interesting for the readers. 1679: 1258:

That was because I was not familiar with that impolite phrase. I had not noticed that phrase in the sources. --

39: 2403:

i.e. after Kerry made the first call, more calls where exchanged between them. Why did you revert me really?

1028:

and stop making such bizarre comments. I just presented multiple reliable sources to prove my claim. Anyway,

2625: 2424: 2386: 2373: 2332: 2298: 2090: 1934: 1900: 1851: 1836: 1380: 1344: 1305: 1278: 1245: 1213: 1188:

within five minutes. His call was followed by multiple other phone call exchange between the two ministers."

1172: 1128: 1090: 1054: 1021: 1008: 916: 904: 891: 849: 209:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a 743: 2726: 2566:. Note that I wouldn't open this topic on the article talk page if I did not want the section balanced. -- 1603: 1517: 1175:: I've got a suggestion for lead. I think we'd better have the phone call part of the lead edited as such: 753: 738: 698: 663: 1770: 1766: 1762: 2527: 2495: 2235: 2196: 2179: 1735: 1556: 1655: 675:

account for navigation equipment" was accidentally removed, although I think it is not that important.

2762: 2734: 2717: 2696: 2675: 2658: 2633: 2604: 2575: 2546: 2531: 2516: 2499: 2481: 2458: 2440: 2412: 2381: 2354: 2340: 2321: 2279: 2254: 2239: 2225: 2200: 2183: 2158: 2141: 2124: 2098: 2080: 2018: 2001: 1992:? Nonsensical statements intended to puff up one's own organization have no place on Knowledge (XXG). 1956: 1942: 1923: 1908: 1881: 1867: 1844: 1816: 1802: 1784: 1739: 1692: 1669: 1615: 1560: 1529: 1495: 1463: 1441: 1423: 1388: 1374: 1352: 1331: 1286: 1267: 1253: 1235: 1221: 1199: 1159: 1136: 1117: 1098: 1070: 1041: 1016: 998:

The 10 sailors onboard were detained for 15 hours and released unharmed after U.S. Secretary of State

987: 969: 899: 880:

The 10 sailors onboard were detained for 15 hours and released unharmed after U.S. Secretary of State

867: 836: 818: 765: 747: 725: 688: 650: 635: 619: 593: 2713: 2120: 1357:

It's just your POV that they "had the upper hand"! Please remove your POVs out of article and as per

1185: 1147: 1003: 885: 791:"read the source: it says they "were returned to the United States", not that they sailed to the US," 457: 2171: 2087: 21: 2754: 2654: 2600: 2571: 2542: 2512: 2477: 2454: 2436: 2408: 2350: 2317: 2275: 2250: 2221: 2154: 2137: 2076: 1997: 1952: 1919: 1877: 1812: 1798: 1688: 1611: 1525: 1459: 1419: 1370: 1327: 1263: 1231: 1195: 1155: 1113: 1066: 1037: 983: 965: 923: 863: 814: 761: 721: 684: 646: 615: 589: 2622: 1896: 1477: 1447: 2758: 2671: 1675: 1595: 949: 608: 605: 1451: 1029: 953: 441: 414: 940:

You also refrained from explaining how your lack of English made you ignore the very fact that

2642:

Full sentence is already included in the body and we don't need this sentence. More over, per

1363:"The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content." 2395: 1892: 1651: 1481: 1358: 2553: 2523: 2504: 2491: 2469: 2231: 2192: 2175: 1828: 1790: 1731: 1599: 1585: 1552: 1513: 832: 631: 370: 2563: 2167: 1319: 676: 2709: 2401:

kerry's call was followed by multiple other phone call exchange between the two ministers,

2216:

to almost something else (that we may reflect the information in the five sources noted).

2116: 1862: 1779: 1664: 1490: 1436: 1314:

and moving towards Tban, I would be more careful about my behavior and and act based on

2684: 2683:- As noted above it's already in the body so doesn't need to be included in the lead. – 2650: 2596: 2567: 2538: 2508: 2487: 2473: 2450: 2446: 2432: 2404: 2346: 2328: 2313: 2271: 2246: 2217: 2214:"Finally, the teenagers bullet plus associated picture have no business in the article" 2150: 2133: 2115:, and perhaps would be is volunteer editors were creating a professional encyclopedia. 2072: 1993: 1948: 1929: 1915: 1887: 1873: 1824: 1808: 1794: 1684: 1607: 1521: 1455: 1415: 1409: 1366: 1339: 1323: 1315: 1273: 1259: 1241: 1227: 1209: 1191: 1151: 1123: 1109: 1078: 1062: 1033: 993: 979: 961: 874: 859: 810: 757: 731: 717: 680: 642: 611: 585: 809:

is clearly POV! I would like to ask you to revert the article to the correct version.

2770: 2667: 2015: 1989: 1985: 1761:

I fully agree. In addition, I think that the whole reaction section is essentially a

1190:

Then we can take the detailed version of the phone calls to the body of the article.

470: 2366: 2044: 931: 976:

Kerry spoke with Iran's Zarif at least five times about detained sailors: official

544: 1981: 828: 778: 627: 577: 101:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to 89: 1977: 1857: 1832: 1774: 1659: 1589: 1485: 1431: 1405: 1181: 1143: 1085: 999: 881: 855: 447: 79: 1588:: Oh! I had to ask it, because same "nonsensical suggestion" was proposed by 2753:

Where exactly was the boat picked up? Important to add that to the article.

2369:

have criticized the US response to the detention, which they deemed too weak

354: 469:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 73: 52: 2362: 2427:

Your tone and behavior is not constructive and is so outrageously NPOV (

672:"Added back january 29 Fars statement. Please stop destructive editing." 2588:

Should the lead show what John Kerry said in order to give due weight?

2389:: The more I think the less I understand why you really reverted me. 2036: 1835:

I think you will find the reactions section much more neutral now.

197: 165: 2113:

The fact that the information should be included should be obvious

2106:

Obviously the information is news-worthy and yes, the information

2209:

Now, after some supports are gained, I see that you have changed

1976:

Salami's ridiculous comments need to go. Has he not heard of the

2725:– per others. That statement really doesn't belong in the lead. 2007:

RfC: Should the photo + text in the reaction section be removed?

102: 555:

WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force

2040: 912: 15: 105:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please

942:"Some politicians like the Republican presidential hopefuls" 543: 385: 369: 353: 238: 1674:

As it seems, only Iranian side has COI! that's funny. FYI,

907:: FYI, The assumption based on which you reverted me, i.e. 2558:

Sorry for pinging you, but please note that I voluntarily

1872:

Your thank, of course, does not make the edit acceptable.

1414:

Can you bring your points regarding the POV issues, here?

909:"I reverted you because you cannot understand English... " 797:

is saying ("Both boats were returned to the United States

666:: Thanks for your edits. But I don't know why you've done 2649:

to see the situation of white house during the incident.

1512:

It's very simple; Calling "the highest-ranking member of

2704:- for reasons given above. (Editor is a volunteer from 1343:

multiple times not to cnavass) I will be reporting you.

2559: 2390: 2308: 2305: 2302: 2210: 2068: 1105: 1058: 1025: 786: 782: 667: 581: 2595:

The clear consensus is not to include the sentence.

1002:'s multiple phone calls to Iranian Foreign Minister 884:'s multiple phone calls to Iranian Foreign Minister 251:

This article has been checked against the following

711:"A post-recovery inventory of the boats found that 701:I agree that an official statement such as that by 336: 250: 2847:United States military history task force articles 1108:. There it was mentioned what the problem was. -- 2837:C-Class United States articles of Low-importance 2842:C-Class United States military history articles 2067:was inserted in the reaction section which was 1807:I forgot to thank you for tagging the article. 946:"Some Republican presidential hopefuls like..." 2361:Some Republican presidential hopefuls such as 958:shouting things loudly does not make them true 1024:: Don't act as if you were unable to read my 8: 2063:and etc. The related information along with 2014:There is a clear consensus to include this. 679:the edit could not be called "destructive". 223:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history 2812:Asian military history task force articles 1322:issue so please consider removing that. -- 1061:? Which part of my explanation was wrong? 948:, the latter being in accordance with the 741: 610:, and etc they were "seized", not "held". 598:Also please note that per sources such as 409: 333: 247: 160: 47: 781:: Could please say on what basis you are 510:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States 203:This article is within the scope of the 2807:C-Class Asian military history articles 1658:. Just don't expect me to reply to it. 411: 162: 49: 19: 2400: 2213: 1646: 1362: 1176: 945: 941: 927: 919: 908: 802: 790: 710: 671: 213:. To use this banner, please see the 2832:Low-importance United States articles 226:Template:WikiProject Military history 7: 2802:Maritime warfare task force articles 2612:The following discussion is closed. 2026:The following discussion is closed. 1184:called the Iranian Foreign Minister 463:This article is within the scope of 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 2852:WikiProject United States articles 513:Template:WikiProject United States 14: 2822:Post-Cold War task force articles 2797:C-Class maritime warfare articles 2792:C-Class military history articles 1057:: Could I know the reason behind 379:Asian military history task force 2740:The discussion above is closed. 2359:Your version puts this sentence 2285:The discussion above is closed. 2270:relevant, sourced, encyclopedic 1482:persuade you to change your mind 1226:Firstly, let's see your source. 944:is fundamentally different from 450: 440: 413: 310: 299: 288: 277: 266: 196: 164: 123:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Iran 109:where you can contribute to the 82: 72: 51: 20: 793:showing that you know what the 774:"returned to the United States" 530:This article has been rated as 143:This article has been rated as 2827:C-Class United States articles 2817:C-Class Post-Cold War articles 1602:after the commander-in-chief, 1516:after the commander-in-chief, 1: 1654:. You can obviously have the 1496:17:31, 27 February 2016 (UTC) 1464:08:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC) 1442:17:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC) 1424:04:15, 26 February 2016 (UTC) 1146:and Iranian Foreign Minister 1042:03:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC) 1017:18:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC) 988:14:31, 25 February 2016 (UTC) 970:14:23, 25 February 2016 (UTC) 900:13:28, 25 February 2016 (UTC) 868:11:03, 25 February 2016 (UTC) 552:This article is supported by 2782:Low-importance Iran articles 2562:on my part, just to show my 2166:the relevant policy here is 837:07:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC) 819:07:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC) 766:05:40, 2 February 2016 (UTC) 748:04:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC) 726:03:54, 2 February 2016 (UTC) 689:19:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC) 651:12:22, 29 January 2016 (UTC) 636:09:29, 29 January 2016 (UTC) 620:16:33, 28 January 2016 (UTC) 594:16:27, 28 January 2016 (UTC) 206:Military history WikiProject 2706:WP:Feedback request service 1007:is giving the wrong sense. 363:Maritime warfare task force 2868: 2576:05:35, 19 April 2016 (UTC) 2547:18:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC) 2532:18:24, 18 April 2016 (UTC) 2517:17:34, 18 April 2016 (UTC) 2500:16:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC) 2413:12:02, 29 March 2016 (UTC) 2382:07:11, 29 March 2016 (UTC) 2355:06:38, 29 March 2016 (UTC) 2341:06:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC) 2322:05:10, 29 March 2016 (UTC) 2255:16:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC) 2240:15:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC) 2226:06:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC) 2201:06:38, 29 March 2016 (UTC) 2184:04:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC) 2159:11:28, 21 March 2016 (UTC) 2142:03:58, 19 March 2016 (UTC) 2125:16:44, 16 March 2016 (UTC) 2099:03:47, 12 March 2016 (UTC) 2081:07:01, 10 March 2016 (UTC) 2019:14:52, 18 April 2016 (UTC) 2002:17:59, 10 March 2016 (UTC) 580:: Which policy led you to 536:project's importance scale 271:Referencing and citation: 149:project's importance scale 2787:WikiProject Iran articles 2482:08:17, 9 April 2016 (UTC) 2459:02:11, 4 April 2016 (UTC) 2441:00:47, 4 April 2016 (UTC) 2301:: You reverted me twice ( 2280:00:42, 4 April 2016 (UTC) 1957:16:39, 9 March 2016 (UTC) 1943:16:28, 9 March 2016 (UTC) 1924:16:26, 9 March 2016 (UTC) 1909:16:19, 9 March 2016 (UTC) 1882:07:52, 9 March 2016 (UTC) 1868:16:37, 7 March 2016 (UTC) 1845:07:06, 7 March 2016 (UTC) 1817:06:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC) 1803:06:32, 7 March 2016 (UTC) 1785:21:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC) 1740:18:38, 6 March 2016 (UTC) 1693:18:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC) 1670:16:57, 6 March 2016 (UTC) 1616:13:57, 6 March 2016 (UTC) 1561:07:30, 6 March 2016 (UTC) 1530:07:19, 5 March 2016 (UTC) 1287:16:15, 9 March 2016 (UTC) 1268:16:09, 9 March 2016 (UTC) 1254:15:27, 9 March 2016 (UTC) 1236:13:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC) 1222:08:34, 9 March 2016 (UTC) 1200:06:10, 9 March 2016 (UTC) 1160:06:23, 6 March 2016 (UTC) 1137:03:35, 6 March 2016 (UTC) 1118:18:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC) 1099:12:56, 5 March 2016 (UTC) 1071:10:47, 5 March 2016 (UTC) 705:is preferred to that of ' 670:. Your edit summary says: 551: 529: 466:WikiProject United States 435: 393: 377: 361: 332: 229:military history articles 191: 142: 126:Template:WikiProject Iran 67: 46: 2763:12:42, 7 July 2016 (UTC) 2742:Please do not modify it. 2735:18:08, 2 June 2016 (UTC) 2718:14:27, 31 May 2016 (UTC) 2697:13:12, 29 May 2016 (UTC) 2676:20:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC) 2659:08:27, 14 May 2016 (UTC) 2634:07:37, 14 May 2016 (UTC) 2614:Please do not modify it. 2605:14:56, 3 June 2016 (UTC) 2465:Simulation of the arrest 2287:Please do not modify it. 2028:Please do not modify it. 1389:07:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC) 1375:07:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC) 1353:06:53, 14 May 2016 (UTC) 1332:06:45, 14 May 2016 (UTC) 803:"both boats returned to 471:United States of America 395:Post-Cold War task force 337:Associated task forces: 282:Coverage and accuracy: 1652:you will agree with me 1604:Ayatollah Ali Khamenei 1518:Ayatollah Ali Khamenei 1179:U.S Secretary of State 1083:U.S Secretary of State 807:under their own power" 548: 516:United States articles 390: 374: 358: 315:Supporting materials: 243: 28:This article is rated 2777:C-Class Iran articles 799:under their own power 547: 389: 373: 357: 242: 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 1148:Mohammad Javad Zarif 1004:Mohammad Javad Zarif 886:Mohammad Javad Zarif 458:United States portal 2294:Chronological order 1081:This sentence "The 926:where we it reads: 924:The Washington Post 825:the Persian Gulf): 677:assuming good faith 659:Destructive editing 484:Articles Requested! 304:Grammar and style: 257:for B-class status: 2626:FreeatlastChitchat 2615: 2425:FreeatlastChitchat 2387:FreeatlastChitchat 2374:FreeatlastChitchat 2333:FreeatlastChitchat 2299:FreeatlastChitchat 2091:FreeatlastChitchat 2029: 1935:FreeatlastChitchat 1901:FreeatlastChitchat 1852:FreeatlastChitchat 1837:FreeatlastChitchat 1676:Hassan Firouzabadi 1596:Hassan Firouzabadi 1381:FreeatlastChitchat 1345:FreeatlastChitchat 1310:While reported at 1306:FreeatlastChitchat 1279:FreeatlastChitchat 1246:FreeatlastChitchat 1214:FreeatlastChitchat 1173:FreeatlastChitchat 1129:FreeatlastChitchat 1091:FreeatlastChitchat 1055:FreeatlastChitchat 1030:don't shout please 1022:FreeatlastChitchat 1009:FreeatlastChitchat 954:don't shout please 905:FreeatlastChitchat 892:FreeatlastChitchat 850:FreeatlastChitchat 694:Just two SIM cards 549: 391: 375: 359: 244: 211:list of open tasks 113:and help with our 34:content assessment 2727:United States Man 2613: 2027: 750: 570: 569: 566: 565: 562: 561: 408: 407: 404: 403: 400: 399: 328: 327: 284:criterion not met 215:full instructions 159: 158: 155: 154: 2859: 2694: 2689: 2557: 2307:) alleging that 2086:Remove : As per 1865: 1860: 1855: 1782: 1777: 1680:Can you hear me? 1667: 1662: 1600:Iranian military 1592: 1514:Iranian military 1493: 1488: 1439: 1434: 1413: 1309: 974:Another source: 922:Also, let's see 853: 801:"). By the way, 518: 517: 514: 511: 508: 460: 455: 454: 453: 444: 437: 436: 431: 428: 426:Military history 417: 410: 344: 334: 318: 314: 313: 307: 303: 302: 296: 292: 291: 285: 281: 280: 274: 270: 269: 248: 231: 230: 227: 224: 221: 220:Military history 200: 193: 192: 187: 172:Military history 168: 161: 131: 130: 127: 124: 121: 107:join the project 98:WikiProject Iran 92: 87: 86: 85: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 2867: 2866: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2767: 2766: 2751: 2746: 2745: 2690: 2685: 2618: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2590: 2551: 2467: 2296: 2291: 2290: 2032: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2009: 1863: 1858: 1849: 1780: 1775: 1665: 1660: 1590: 1491: 1486: 1437: 1432: 1403: 1401: 1303: 847: 845: 776: 754:Dropsandstrikes 739:Dropsandstrikes 699:Dropsandstrikes 696: 664:Dropsandstrikes 661: 575: 515: 512: 509: 506: 505: 504: 490:Become a Member 456: 451: 449: 429: 423: 342: 316: 311: 305: 300: 294: 289: 283: 278: 272: 267: 228: 225: 222: 219: 218: 174: 128: 125: 122: 119: 118: 88: 83: 81: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 2865: 2863: 2855: 2854: 2849: 2844: 2839: 2834: 2829: 2824: 2819: 2814: 2809: 2804: 2799: 2794: 2789: 2784: 2779: 2769: 2768: 2750: 2747: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2720: 2699: 2678: 2661: 2619: 2610: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2589: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2549: 2466: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2295: 2292: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2204: 2203: 2186: 2161: 2144: 2127: 2101: 2033: 2024: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2008: 2005: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1926: 1805: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1400: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1335: 1334: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1203: 1202: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1074: 1073: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 972: 844: 841: 840: 839: 775: 772: 771: 770: 769: 768: 746:comment added 734: 695: 692: 660: 657: 656: 655: 654: 653: 574: 571: 568: 567: 564: 563: 560: 559: 550: 540: 539: 532:Low-importance 528: 522: 521: 519: 503: 502: 497: 492: 487: 480: 478:Template Usage 474: 462: 461: 445: 433: 432: 430:Low‑importance 418: 406: 405: 402: 401: 398: 397: 392: 382: 381: 376: 366: 365: 360: 350: 349: 347: 345: 339: 338: 330: 329: 326: 325: 323: 321: 320: 319: 308: 297: 286: 275: 261: 260: 258: 245: 235: 234: 232: 201: 189: 188: 169: 157: 156: 153: 152: 145:Low-importance 141: 135: 134: 132: 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 62:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2864: 2853: 2850: 2848: 2845: 2843: 2840: 2838: 2835: 2833: 2830: 2828: 2825: 2823: 2820: 2818: 2815: 2813: 2810: 2808: 2805: 2803: 2800: 2798: 2795: 2793: 2790: 2788: 2785: 2783: 2780: 2778: 2775: 2774: 2772: 2765: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2748: 2743: 2736: 2732: 2728: 2724: 2723:Don't include 2721: 2719: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2702:Don't include 2700: 2698: 2695: 2693: 2688: 2682: 2681:Don't include 2679: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2664:Don't include 2662: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2645: 2641: 2640:Don't include 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2624: 2617: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2587: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2555: 2550: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2397: 2392: 2388: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2370: 2368: 2364: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2310: 2306: 2303: 2300: 2293: 2288: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2266: 2265: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2212: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2187: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2162: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2145: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2128: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2109: 2105: 2102: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2089: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2031: 2020: 2017: 2006: 2004: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1990:Bowe Bergdahl 1987: 1986:Jessica Lynch 1983: 1979: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1931: 1927: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1889: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1866: 1861: 1853: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1783: 1778: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1668: 1663: 1657: 1653: 1648: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1587: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1497: 1494: 1489: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1440: 1435: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1411: 1407: 1398: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1341: 1337: 1336: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1307: 1302: 1301: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1275: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1187: 1183: 1180: 1174: 1171: 1170: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1125: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1087: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1075: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1053: 1052: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1005: 1001: 995: 991: 990: 989: 985: 981: 977: 973: 971: 967: 963: 959: 955: 951: 947: 943: 939: 936: 933: 929: 925: 921: 917: 914: 910: 906: 903: 902: 901: 897: 893: 888: 887: 883: 876: 872: 871: 870: 869: 865: 861: 857: 851: 842: 838: 834: 830: 827: 823: 822: 821: 820: 816: 812: 808: 806: 800: 796: 792: 788: 784: 780: 773: 767: 763: 759: 755: 752: 751: 749: 745: 740: 735: 733: 730: 729: 728: 727: 723: 719: 716: 714: 708: 704: 700: 693: 691: 690: 686: 682: 678: 673: 669: 665: 658: 652: 648: 644: 639: 638: 637: 633: 629: 624: 623: 622: 621: 617: 613: 609: 606: 603: 600: 596: 595: 591: 587: 583: 579: 572: 557: 556: 546: 542: 541: 537: 533: 527: 524: 523: 520: 507:United States 501: 498: 496: 493: 491: 488: 486: 485: 481: 479: 476: 475: 472: 468: 467: 459: 448: 446: 443: 439: 438: 434: 427: 422: 421:United States 419: 416: 412: 396: 388: 384: 383: 380: 372: 368: 367: 364: 356: 352: 351: 348: 346: 341: 340: 335: 331: 324: 322: 317:criterion met 309: 306:criterion met 298: 295:criterion met 287: 276: 273:criterion met 265: 264: 263: 262: 259: 256: 255: 249: 246: 241: 237: 236: 233: 216: 212: 208: 207: 202: 199: 195: 194: 190: 186: 185:Post-Cold War 182: 178: 173: 170: 167: 163: 150: 146: 140: 137: 136: 133: 129:Iran articles 116: 112: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 2752: 2741: 2722: 2701: 2691: 2686: 2680: 2663: 2639: 2620: 2611: 2468: 2428: 2423: 2367:Donald Trump 2360: 2297: 2286: 2267: 2188: 2163: 2146: 2129: 2112: 2107: 2103: 2034: 2025: 1975: 1771:WP:QUOTEFARM 1767:WP:LONGQUOTE 1763:WP:QUOTEFARM 1760: 1594:saying that 1402: 997: 932:The Atlantic 879: 846: 804: 798: 777: 712: 707:The Atlantic 697: 662: 597: 576: 553: 531: 495:Project Talk 483: 464: 252: 204: 144: 96: 40:WikiProjects 2749:Coordinates 2644:this source 2560:did the job 2554:BlueMoonset 2524:BlueMoonset 2505:BlueMoonset 2492:BlueMoonset 2470:BlueMoonset 2232:BlueMoonset 2193:BlueMoonset 2176:Vanamonde93 2053:Irdiplomacy 1984:, or hell, 1982:Vietnam War 1829:BlueMoonset 1791:BlueMoonset 1732:BlueMoonset 1586:BlueMoonset 1553:BlueMoonset 1186:Javad Zarif 1059:this revert 742:—Preceding 573:Some points 293:Structure: 111:discussions 90:Iran portal 2771:Categories 2710:BoogaLouie 2564:good faith 2391:My version 2309:my version 2172:WP:NOTNEWS 2117:Damotclese 2088:WP:NOTNEWS 2057:Daily mail 1978:Korean War 1833:User:Dr.K. 1399:POV issues 1182:John Kerry 1144:John Kerry 1086:John Kerry 1000:John Kerry 882:John Kerry 856:John Kerry 787:My version 115:open tasks 2651:Mhhossein 2623:WP:WEIGHT 2597:Mhhossein 2568:Mhhossein 2539:Mhhossein 2509:Mhhossein 2488:Mhhossein 2474:Mhhossein 2451:Mhhossein 2447:BlueSalix 2433:BlueSalix 2405:Mhhossein 2347:Mhhossein 2329:Mhhossein 2314:Mhhossein 2272:BlueSalix 2247:Mhhossein 2218:Mhhossein 2151:Mhhossein 2134:ViperFace 2073:Mhhossein 1994:Parsecboy 1949:Mhhossein 1930:Mhhossein 1916:Mhhossein 1897:WP:BURDEN 1888:Mhhossein 1874:Mhhossein 1825:Mhhossein 1809:Mhhossein 1795:Mhhossein 1685:Mhhossein 1656:last word 1608:Mhhossein 1522:Mhhossein 1478:WP:CENSOR 1456:Mhhossein 1448:cesnoring 1416:Mhhossein 1410:Amberrock 1367:Mhhossein 1340:Mhhossein 1324:Mhhossein 1316:BlueSalix 1274:Mhhossein 1260:Mhhossein 1242:Mhhossein 1228:Mhhossein 1210:Mhhossein 1192:Mhhossein 1152:Mhhossein 1124:Mhhossein 1110:Mhhossein 1079:Mhhossein 1063:Mhhossein 1034:Mhhossein 994:Mhhossein 980:Mhhossein 962:Mhhossein 875:Mhhossein 860:Mhhossein 811:Mhhossein 783:reverting 758:Mhhossein 732:Mhhossein 718:Mhhossein 681:Mhhossein 668:this edit 643:Mhhossein 612:Mhhossein 586:Mhhossein 582:this edit 2755:Debbiesw 2668:Pincrete 2363:Ted Cruz 2061:Observer 2049:CTV News 2016:Armbrust 1452:WP:UNDUE 956:because 254:criteria 177:Maritime 2268:Include 2189:Comment 2164:Comment 2147:Include 2130:Include 2104:Include 2069:removed 2065:a photo 1893:WP:NPOV 1359:WP:ONUS 1106:comment 1026:comment 744:undated 703:Centcom 534:on the 147:on the 30:C-class 2170:, not 2168:WP:DUE 2037:Tehran 1980:, the 1765:. Per 950:source 829:Nick-D 795:source 779:Nick-D 628:Nick-D 578:Nick-D 500:Alerts 36:scale. 2687:Davey 1591:Dr.K. 1406:Dr.K. 1177:"The 181:Asian 2759:talk 2731:talk 2714:talk 2692:2010 2672:talk 2655:talk 2630:talk 2601:talk 2572:talk 2543:talk 2528:talk 2513:talk 2496:talk 2478:talk 2455:talk 2437:talk 2409:talk 2396:lead 2378:talk 2365:and 2351:talk 2337:talk 2318:talk 2304:and 2276:talk 2251:talk 2236:talk 2222:talk 2211:your 2197:talk 2180:talk 2155:talk 2138:talk 2121:talk 2095:talk 2077:talk 2039:and 1998:talk 1953:talk 1939:talk 1920:talk 1905:talk 1878:talk 1841:talk 1831:and 1813:talk 1799:talk 1736:talk 1689:talk 1612:talk 1557:talk 1526:talk 1460:talk 1420:talk 1408:and 1385:talk 1371:talk 1349:talk 1328:talk 1283:talk 1264:talk 1250:talk 1232:talk 1218:talk 1196:talk 1156:talk 1133:talk 1114:talk 1095:talk 1067:talk 1038:talk 1013:talk 984:talk 966:talk 896:talk 864:talk 843:Lead 833:talk 815:talk 805:base 785:me? 762:talk 722:talk 685:talk 647:talk 632:talk 616:talk 590:talk 120:Iran 103:Iran 59:Iran 2045:BBC 2041:Qom 1988:or 1859:Dr. 1776:Dr. 1661:Dr. 1487:Dr. 1433:Dr. 1320:POV 918:), 913:CNN 713:all 526:Low 139:Low 2773:: 2761:) 2733:) 2716:) 2708:) 2674:) 2657:) 2632:) 2603:) 2574:) 2545:) 2530:) 2515:) 2498:) 2480:) 2457:) 2439:) 2411:) 2380:) 2353:) 2339:) 2320:) 2278:) 2253:) 2238:) 2224:) 2199:) 2182:) 2157:) 2140:) 2123:) 2108:is 2097:) 2079:) 2059:, 2055:, 2051:, 2047:, 2000:) 1955:) 1941:) 1922:) 1907:) 1880:) 1864:K. 1843:) 1815:) 1801:) 1781:K. 1738:) 1691:) 1666:K. 1614:) 1559:) 1528:) 1492:K. 1484:. 1462:) 1438:K. 1422:) 1387:) 1373:) 1361:, 1351:) 1330:) 1312:AE 1285:) 1266:) 1252:) 1234:) 1220:) 1198:) 1158:) 1135:) 1116:) 1097:) 1077:@ 1069:) 1040:) 1015:) 986:) 978:. 968:) 960:. 930:. 898:) 866:) 835:) 817:) 764:) 724:) 687:) 649:) 634:) 618:) 607:, 604:, 601:, 592:) 584:? 424:: 343:/ 183:/ 179:/ 175:: 2757:( 2729:( 2712:( 2670:( 2653:( 2628:( 2599:( 2570:( 2556:: 2552:@ 2541:( 2526:( 2511:( 2494:( 2476:( 2453:( 2435:( 2407:( 2376:( 2349:( 2335:( 2327:@ 2316:( 2274:( 2249:( 2234:( 2220:( 2195:( 2178:( 2153:( 2136:( 2119:( 2093:( 2075:( 1996:( 1951:( 1937:( 1928:@ 1918:( 1903:( 1886:@ 1876:( 1854:: 1850:@ 1839:( 1823:@ 1811:( 1797:( 1734:( 1687:( 1610:( 1555:( 1524:( 1458:( 1418:( 1412:: 1404:@ 1383:( 1369:( 1347:( 1338:@ 1326:( 1308:: 1304:@ 1281:( 1272:@ 1262:( 1248:( 1240:@ 1230:( 1216:( 1208:@ 1194:( 1154:( 1131:( 1122:@ 1112:( 1093:( 1065:( 1036:( 1011:( 992:@ 982:( 964:( 934:( 915:( 894:( 873:@ 862:( 852:: 848:@ 831:( 813:( 760:( 720:( 683:( 645:( 630:( 614:( 588:( 558:. 538:. 217:. 151:. 117:. 42::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index