422:
FPTP seats is fixed by the numbers of candidates who won in their own constituency, and can't be lowered. So when it is somewhat close to the calculated share of party votes, it remain at the 55 minimum, like last year. But if you have one or several parties who got very few FPTP seats yet reached the % threshold, you have to give them lot of party list seats to compensate, sometime more in total than the 55 minimum. It's this situation we got this year, as well as the election before the previous one. See the table on the french page for a better look on the whole thing. ;) --
257:
236:
71:
53:
152:
22:
131:
162:
267:
421:
of 110 seats, 55 FPTP seats and 55 party list seats, yet the party list seats are distributed as to have the resulting share of total of seats (FPTP+list) be the closest ppssible to the share of party list votes, as to get proportionnality (for parties that reach the threshold). But the number of
403:), the total number of seats is 110. The total number of seats for each party in the last election also added up to 110. I'm sure an article from a reputable source that has covered the election results could clear this up quite easily.
323:
453:
448:
96:
78:
58:
463:
218:
208:
380:
The total number of seats listed for each party add up to 137, but then the total number of seats listed at the bottom is 205. Which is correct? --
478:
313:
468:
458:
483:
473:
346:
184:
289:
175:
136:
400:
33:
280:
241:
21:
350:
365:
39:
399:, as well as what is stated near the top of the infobox on this page and the previous elections page (
404:
408:
288:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
183:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
427:
82:, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to
361:
396:
90:
385:
431:
412:
389:
369:
354:
256:
235:
167:
70:
52:
442:
423:
272:
381:
262:
157:
151:
130:
94:
and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit
84:
180:
360:
They're not in the infobox because they didn't win any seats in 2013.
345:
Only relevant party without representation on the main page. Biased.
266:
395:
I'm not certain but I think both are wrong. According to the page
285:
15:
284:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
179:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
106:Knowledge:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
454:WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
449:Start-Class Elections and Referendums articles
109:Template:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
8:
19:
230:
125:
47:
232:
127:
49:
376:Seat totals in results seem incorrect
79:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
7:
278:This article is within the scope of
173:This article is within the scope of
76:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
112:Elections and Referendums articles
14:
265:
255:
234:
160:
150:
129:
69:
51:
20:
464:Low-importance Germany articles
318:This article has been rated as
213:This article has been rated as
1:
479:Mid-importance 2010s articles
292:and see a list of open tasks.
193:Knowledge:WikiProject Germany
187:and see a list of open tasks.
469:WikiProject Germany articles
459:Start-Class Germany articles
432:13:41, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
413:08:32, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
401:Hessian state election, 2013
390:07:16, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
370:14:02, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
355:05:51, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
196:Template:WikiProject Germany
341:Missing picture for the AfD
298:Knowledge:WikiProject 2010s
500:
484:WikiProject 2010s articles
474:Start-Class 2010s articles
301:Template:WikiProject 2010s
219:project's importance scale
317:
250:
212:
145:
103:Elections and Referendums
64:
59:Elections and Referendums
46:
28:This article is rated
176:WikiProject Germany
34:content assessment
338:
337:
334:
333:
330:
329:
281:WikiProject 2010s
229:
228:
225:
224:
124:
123:
120:
119:
491:
397:Landtag of Hesse
324:importance scale
306:
305:
302:
299:
296:
275:
270:
269:
259:
252:
251:
246:
238:
231:
201:
200:
199:Germany articles
197:
194:
191:
170:
165:
164:
163:
154:
147:
146:
141:
133:
126:
114:
113:
110:
107:
104:
97:our project page
91:electoral reform
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
499:
498:
494:
493:
492:
490:
489:
488:
439:
438:
378:
343:
303:
300:
297:
294:
293:
271:
264:
244:
198:
195:
192:
189:
188:
166:
161:
159:
139:
111:
108:
105:
102:
101:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
497:
495:
487:
486:
481:
476:
471:
466:
461:
456:
451:
441:
440:
437:
436:
435:
434:
377:
374:
373:
372:
342:
339:
336:
335:
332:
331:
328:
327:
320:Mid-importance
316:
310:
309:
307:
304:2010s articles
290:the discussion
277:
276:
260:
248:
247:
245:Mid‑importance
239:
227:
226:
223:
222:
215:Low-importance
211:
205:
204:
202:
185:the discussion
172:
171:
168:Germany portal
155:
143:
142:
140:Low‑importance
134:
122:
121:
118:
117:
115:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
496:
485:
482:
480:
477:
475:
472:
470:
467:
465:
462:
460:
457:
455:
452:
450:
447:
446:
444:
433:
429:
425:
420:
416:
415:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
393:
392:
391:
387:
383:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
358:
357:
356:
352:
348:
340:
325:
321:
315:
312:
311:
308:
291:
287:
283:
282:
274:
268:
263:
261:
258:
254:
253:
249:
243:
240:
237:
233:
220:
216:
210:
207:
206:
203:
186:
182:
178:
177:
169:
158:
156:
153:
149:
148:
144:
138:
135:
132:
128:
116:
99:
98:
93:
92:
87:
86:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
418:
379:
347:46.93.242.45
344:
319:
279:
273:2010s portal
214:
174:
95:
89:
83:
77:
40:WikiProjects
30:Start-class
443:Categories
417:There's a
405:Helper201
362:MĂ©lencron
85:elections
419:minimum
322:on the
217:on the
190:Germany
181:Germany
137:Germany
36:scale.
424:Aréat
382:Jfruh
295:2010s
286:2010s
242:2010s
428:talk
409:talk
386:talk
366:talk
351:talk
314:Mid
209:Low
445::
430:)
411:)
388:)
368:)
353:)
88:,
426:(
407:(
384:(
364:(
349:(
326:.
221:.
100:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
