Talk:2020 United States federal government data breach

989:

weeks ago, he was fired for displaying exactly these qualities. As Trump raised groundless claims of election fraud to distract from his loss at the polls, Krebs issued a clear statement . In a matter of days, he was out of a job... The SolarWinds compromise dates back to March, so it happened on watch. There’s no indication that the past few months of compromise would be any less ugly if Krebs were still in the director’s chair. But the incident response would be less ugly. Acting director Brandon Wales hasn’t been confirmed and has held his position for less than a month. In the midst of an unusually chaotic transition, he’s asking agency infosec leads to trust him through one of the most sensitive events of their working lives. It’s a difficult position under the best of circumstances, and it would be much, much easier with a trusted hand in charge. It’s all the worse because Krebs’ firing is just the latest in a long chain of similar incidents. President Trump took office actively denying the role of Russian active measures in the 2016 election, despite an unusually definitive attribution by US intelligence agencies. In the years since, he’s taken any suggestion of Russian influence as a personal incident and made denying it a kind of loyalty test.

2212:

that Valerie Boyd, the assistant secretary for international affairs at the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees CISA, had also left. ... The following week, on the night of Tuesday, Nov. 17, Trump used his Twitter feed to fire Krebs. ... In a phone call that evening, Travis said he offered to resign as well, but Krebs urged him to continue since he was next in line to run CISA. But the White House didn’t want him to run CISA, Travis said he was told in a phone call with acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf that night. Travis said he resigned after Wolf’s efforts to intervene with the White House failed. The animus between Trump’s team and the former CISA officials didn’t end there. Trump attorney Joe diGenova on Monday called for violence against Krebs... “He should be drawn and quartered. Taken out at dawn and shot,” he said.

1609:

same time period, installing a piece of malware dubbed "Crisco", and that's how the attackers breached SolarWinds, plus now all the government's Cisco VPNs copy their contents to Moscow...? Well, the journalists would be fine: they'd just headline their new pieces "Crisco hack" or suchlike. But if we had already renamed this Knowledge (XXG) article "Sunburst hack", then suddenly we'd have to rename it again. Fundamentally, as encyclopedia editors, we should focus on the broad event, which in this case is: a data breach (however it happened) that notably empowered the attackers and had a notable impact on privacy and security for notable institutions and the millions of people they serve, and which may lead to notable policy outcomes.

2196:

Tuesday evening, Krebs’ deputy, Matt Travis, resigned under pressure from the White House, Travis said. (A DHS spokesperson disputed that Travis was forced to resign.) Last week, the White House also forced out Bryan S. Ware, CISA’s assistant director for cybersecurity. ... The most senior political appointee positions at CISA are currently vacant. In October, the White House said it would nominate Sean Plankey, a Department of Energy official, as CISA’s assistant director. But at press time Wednesday, Plankey remains at DOE. Neither the White House nor DOE responded to a request for comment about Plankey’s status.

463: 2164:

Ohio, was part of a team of CISA officials who rebuilt trust between election officials across the country and federal personnel after the 2016 election. After CISA officials repeatedly pointed out that mail-in voting is secure, and maintained a “Rumor Control” website to debunk election conspiracy theories, the White House carried out a purge of the agency’s leadership. Trump fired CISA Director Chris Krebs by tweet on Nov. 17., and Krebs’ deputy, Matt Travis, resigned shortly thereafter...

442: 1924:

only of the attacker's actions and ignored those of the defenders. The defenders in this case include: the companies whose products were compromised (SolarWinds, Microsoft, maybe others yet to be identified); the customers of those companies (who should, ideally, have been monitoring their networks for suspicious activity, as FireEye clearly did but most others apparently did not); and the U.S. government, of which the executive branch is where, by convention,

363: 342: 473: 1656:“Everybody’s talking about SUNBURST … but SUNBURST is just the initial show, it’s just the stage one,” said Kyle Hanslovan, the co-founder and CEO of Huntress Labs and a former National Security Agency employee. “We’re hardly talking about TEARDROP or the use of Cobalt Strike within the network, which is designed to be a sophisticated, unattributable nation-state level capability. … That’s where I think this real story is going to happen.” 2228:

time, Assistant Director for Cybersecurity at DHS Bryan Ware and Deputy Director of CISA Matt Travis were also forced out. DHS does not have a Senate-confirmed Secretary, Deputy Secretary, General Counsel, or Undersecretary for Management. Additionally, there is no White House cybersecurity coordinator, no State Dept. cybersecurity coordinator, the National Security Agency Director is leaving on a romantic vacation in Europe...

216: 88: 1871: 53: 176: 4028:). Smith is a lawyer who works for a company (Microsoft) that is extensively involved in surveillance, so his words aren't idle (even if one disagrees with him, he has the ear of governments and of perhaps the most powerful software company on the planet). His is a remark in an important debate about, basically, whether the US should regard itself as now being in a cyberwar. That debate also includes 196: 22: 156: 278: 4203: 974:

the hack itself did occur when Krebs was running the agency, there's no question that, had he still been in that job, the response to it would have been much less of a chewy cluster of fck. Perhaps it also would have been better not to hand the presidency over to a crooked, incompetent agent of chaos for four years, too. Live and learn.

4578:

gift cards is where every RS source fizzles out. With the mitigation long over, the search for the exploiters fell apart, and every hacker seems to hop through and use a Ukrainian, Belarus or Russian VPN service. Baring a 1989-1991 opening of the KGB valt type event in Russia, I don't think it will ever be clear for RS reporting.

924:

specific institutions for further exploitation. The nature and prominence of those institutions; the nature of the data stolen or tampered with; and the suspected identity of the attackers, suggests that the event was a skirmish designed to secure the attacker a medium-to-long-term advantage in what is often called the

3135:

Including such a controversial quote needs to be carefully contextualized as a particular point of view. Simply including such a statement in the lead or in a section on scientific evaluation of Bigfoot claims is potentially misleading, non-neutral, and lacking in verifiability. The quote should only

3049:

No, but more credible people have. Identifying state-sponsored attackers is clearly not SolarWinds's area of expertise. But it is an area of expertise for CISA, the FBI, etc, who brief the Secretary of State and the politicians on Congress's intelligence committees, etc. And these politicians are the

2227:

Trump has decimated the cybersecurity arm of the federal government and failed to nominate confirmable leaders of Homeland Security. Last month, Trump fired the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, Christopher Krebs, for refusing to undermine the election. Around the same

1776:

At the time of the attack, the U.S. did not have a Senate-confirmed permanent appointee in the role of Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (the nation's top cybersecurity official). The previous appointee, Christopher Krebs, had been fired on 18 November 2020 by President

1608:

Journalistic writing is about transient breaking news, so journalists can come up with a new title to suit whatever people are calling an incident that day. But we aren't journalists. Suppose tomorrow we learn that, for instance, Cisco also suffered a supply chain attack from the same suspects in the

1030:

No disrespect, but I am still not in favor of any POV quotes. These quotes seem obviously POV to me. The original quote uses "blindsided again", "what's worse". The Slate quote uses "wailing". Esquire uses "lies" and "fantasies". This language is simply too emotionally charged for a technical article

973:

CISA agency at Homeland Security is the group that Christopher Krebs successfully led through the 2020 elections until the president fired him because Krebs declined to devote his time to substantiating the president's lies and fantasies. Perhaps it would have been better not to have done that. While

821:

Let me make my point another way. I do not think an article about hacking should be so political. Do readers really want to come to an article about hacking, which is computer science/technical, and read a bunch of subtle rebukes of Donald Trump? The Russians are the ones responsible for this hack...

4561:

Based on the text in the article, which does not present conclusions about the involvement of Russia, would it be sensible to change the first sentence to: "In 2020, a major cyberattack suspected to have been committed by a group backed by the Russian government penetrated thousands of organizations

4496:

Trump pointing to China characterized as spurious in Knowledge (XXG) voice. This isn't supported by the citations, which merely state that US experts they *believe* Russia to be responsible. Also, what does the "without evidence" in "U.S. president Donald Trump publicly addressed the attacks for the

4075:

Didn't see this before. I thought that the cyberattack vs. cyber-espionage debate (Goldsmith, etc.) was really important, but that the sources were not well summarized (the authors weren't even mentioned before, only the publications—which is weird since this was all commentary/opinion pieces). So I

3971:

preference would be to finish the work you have started, as you suggest. But I literally cannot spare the time just now. There is some other (unrelated) editing I need to finish so that I can clear some browser tabs; and I have much off-wiki business, besides, in the next 48 hours (and indeed, until

1923:

is also part of the context. In a successful attack (cyber, military, sports, whatever), the responsibility for that success comes down partly to the attacker's strategy and execution, and partly to the defender's strategy and execution. We would be failing in our duty to be encyclopedic if we wrote

4279:

After reading a number of pieces about the JetBrains product TeamCity being investigated (including by the FBI) as a possible vector in the breaches, I don't think the matter warrants inclusion in the article yet. It isn't notable that TeamCity is being investigated. But if in the future a credible

3885:

My primary concern about doing as you suggested above (and as you have now done) is that parts of the content could easily become incomprehensible, as many of the responses presented there were made at least partly in reply to earlier ones, or at least are introduced in the context of earlier ones.

3098:

the POTUS, he does have access to the topmost intelligence, he has the loudest bullhorn on Earth, and he is making an assertion that is entirely consistent with his previous insistence of absolving Russia for everything and deflecting blame to his personal adversaries, and this is leadworthy due to

2211:

Nov. 11, White House officials notified CISA that they would be asking for the resignation of Bryan Ware, who worked on election security as the assistant director of cybersecurity at CISA and whose resignation ultimately took effect two days later, according to Travis. At the same time, news broke

1211:

that support the essential operations of partner departments and agencies. We coordinate security and resilience efforts using trusted partnerships across the private and public sectors, and deliver technical assistance and assessments to federal stakeholders as well as to infrastructure owners and

1036:

If another editor weighs in here in this section and disagrees with me, I'd be fine with you adding it back in. But I don't think my view will change on this. I arrived at a technical article, I gave it a read, and I'm seeing all these unexpected digs at Trump in what should be a technical article.

640:

The quote also speaks to the relationship between the hack and the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Readers will already know from earlier in the article that based on Trump's conspiracy theory about the election, Trump had recently fired the person responsible for U.S. government network security.

594:

Analysts said it was hard to know which was worse: that the federal government was blindsided again by Russian intelligence agencies, or that when it was evident what was happening, White House officials said nothing. But this much is clear: While President Trump was complaining about the hack that

3979:

Between the two horns of this dilemma, I'm going have to choose to revert, in the hope that you or I (or someone else) will take another go at it on a day when they have enough time to see it through properly. I really hope you will be understanding of this. You had the right idea and made a great

988:

CISA hasn’t had much time to work — but under Krebs, the agency was gaining trust. The director had bipartisan support and was seen by the cybersecurity community as an impartial arbiter, someone who would be honest about the facts on the ground even if it was politically inconvenient. Then, a few

673:

The quote hardly belabors its points. It is succinct - two sentences - and addresses questions likely to be in the reader's mind. The hack was arguably a political act against political targets, so it is understandable that responses and coverage will also be "political". But the quote does not go

4577:

I don't know we can conclude Russia or China or US False Flag or disgruntled employee plus at this point, the open sources investigation has fizzled out per SolarWinds corporate communications. The open source reporting of how much a dead end Russian VPN servers paid for by untraceable cash to

3959:

It's awkward because I admire the start you made. I broadly agree with the subsections you chose to create, and I think you have convincingly made the case for subdividing the section. I also think that in your edits, you moved each sentence from the old section into the same new subsections as I

2195:

CISA is now led on an acting basis by Brandon Wales... How long Wales will lead the agency remains unclear. The dismantling of CISA’s leadership has employees on edge. And CISA’s continued work to debunk fraud claims could draw additional White House scrutiny. After Trump fired Krebs via tweet on

2179:

Bryan S. Ware, who took the reins as the senior most Department of Homeland Security official focused exclusively on cybersecurity in January, is stepping down from his post and heading to the private sector. made a point of getting better data, with the help of software tools, into the hands of

923:

Put differently, this article isn't about hacking in general, or hacking as a pure technical skill. It's about a specific cyberattack and the resulting data breach. The victims of the attack don't seem to have been chosen at random. Even among the users of Orion, the attackers apparently targeted

3645:

Swisscom bestätigt uns auf Anfrage, dass man Kunde von Solarwinds sei. Die kompromittierte Softwarekomponente von Solarwinds überwache eine Virtualisierungs-Infrastruktur, auf der Microsoft-Produkte für Geschäftskunden laufen. Der Hersteller habe zwei Hotfixes zur Verfügung gestellt und man habe

2163:

Matt Masterson... is leaving his post as of next week... Masterson has been a senior adviser at the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency since 2018. ... Masterson said his last day at CISA will be Dec. 18. ... Masterson, a former election official in

767:

Re: a link between Trump's election interference, and this data breach, I don't see a logical fallacy. I see a basic claim ("Trump has sounded the alarm about a fictitious threat, while staying silent about a real threat"), and a more sophisticated claim ("Had Trump not been so busy sounding the

2260:

Trump fired a couple of people out of thousands of people that work for CISA. Unless, you find a source that says CISA was overwhelmed because of Trump's actions, I think the most you can say is something like: "The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) helped to compensate an overwhelmed

1904:

Without that knowledge, it will be hard for the reader to make an informed interpretation of the nature and timing of the responses, or the degree of opportunism displayed by the attackers. And since we cannot assume that knowledge on the part of the reader, it needs to be mentioned (concisely;

1781:

Here's some more sentences that try to malign Trump. Again, I am anti Trump, but logically this just seems really weak. The attacks started in March 2020, well before Trump's lame duck period, and well before he unfairly fired Krebs. I personally think the inclusion of these sentences creates

1900:

Will, say, a non-US student, reading this article five years hence, know that in December 2020, there was a lame-duck president in office; or that CISA only had an acting director at the time (or that the White House cybersecurity co-ordinator had been fired a couple of years earlier and not

625:

This is the "Responses" section. If a foreign power hacks a nation's treasury, defense department, health agencies (and more!), then readers would expect to see a response from the head of state (and perhaps also from the treasury secretary, defense secretary, health secretary, etc). In an

4157:"In March 2020, a major cyberattack by a group backed by a foreign government penetrated multiple parts of United States federal government, via software released from three U.S. firms: Microsoft, SolarWinds, and VMware, leading to data breaches, and the breach discovered December 2020." 4332:

Thanks, but Shafirov had already repeatedly denied that TeamCity/Jetbrains was an attack vector (except possibly via misconfiguration). That he has repeated those denials through Forbes changes nothing, at least in relation to whether or not to mention TeamCity/Jetbrains in the article.

2141:

In recent weeks CISA's director, and assistant director have stepped down or been fired by president Donald Trump, and other high-ranking DHS cybersecurity officials have been pushed out as well. The exodus comes at an inopportune time, as CISA helps coordinate a defensive push across

3141:

All that said, with the edits made to the article since this TP thread began, the quote in the lede has since been contextualized much better, and I am content to accept its continued inclusion as long as it stays that way. I think you and I may have found consensus :-) Thanks again,

3902:

Would you be willing either to continue editing until the sense of each response has been restored, or else just to revert that section to how it used to be? I appreciate that you put some effort into the reorganization just now and you might be loath to do either; but I'm afraid it

2104:

indicated to FERC this week that CISA was overwhelmed and might not be able to allocate the necessary resources to respond. Several top officials from CISA, including its former director Christopher Krebs, have either been pushed out by the Trump administration or resigned in recent

3829:

The "responses" section is getting a little large, and has no sub-sections. My instinct is that grouping by date is no longer the best way to organize this section. I would suggest instead grouping by topic. If you agree, I'd be happy to take a stab at re-organizing this. Thanks.

3071:

2261:

CISA." Again, this is based on my understanding of the original research guidance. I'm sure my understanding could be wrong, which is why I was seeking a second opinion on original research. Specifically, I'm wondering about the limitations of synthesis of published material,

3099:

this incident being perhaps the most significant hack to date that reportedly might have penetrated highly sensitive federal government networks, and thus the full extent of the damage might never be fully disclosed, so we are left with what the commander in chief tells us.

1443:

for "data breach solarwinds" turns up various article names that use a variation of this title: "SolarWinds hack", "SolarWinds breach", "SolarWinds supply chain attack", "SolarWinds compromise", etc. I don't feel strongly about this though, I'm happy to hear other opinions.

3975:

Hence the awkwardness. You force me to choose between leaving it in a confused state (which, as I say, I can't do in good conscience); or reverting, which you say I am free to do, but is still a pain on my conscience because of the effort you put in and the good start you

1153:

Also, quick side point... Is it even clear that CISA is in charge of protecting the executive branch's networks from foreign intrusions? Even this article mentions that FireEye/SolarWinds worked with NSA, not CISA. As far as I know, Trump didn't do any shake ups at NSA.

1908:

If it were a different president, and a different context ("The attack was discovered six months after President Zarniwoop took office, bringing with him what CNN called 'the most impressive cybersecurity team in America's history...") then it would still be worthy of

2495:

This article seems very US-focused. But Solarwinds Orion is used all over the world. Wouldn't it make sense to have one article about the Sunburst trojan in itself, and then follow up with the impact in different parts of the world, possible on separate subarticles?

3963:

But I would have created a context for comprehensibility within each subsection, including specifying the dates on which each of the responses occurred. Without that, and with obvious concerns like Bossert/Smith lingering, I can't in good conscience leave it as it

3649:

Swisscom confirmed on request that they are Solarwinds customer. The compromised software component is used for supervising virtalization infrastructure, where Microsoft products for business customers are running. Two hotfixes by the vendor have been installed.

3511:"Departments" would be misleading too, incidentally, because in some cases only specific parts of a department were reportedly affected rather than the whole department (e.g. NTIA was reportedly the affected part of the DoC); and because it is plausible that non- 776:

The sophisticated claim is a conclusion resting on both the basic claim and some unstated but plausible premises like "Government resources are finite". So, not a full-fledged sound argument; but quite possibly a true conclusion anyway. Certainly not a logical

2353:

I think the claim was a reasonable summary of the points made in the cited sources, and I note that you yourself felt that it might be allowable. But I note your point about "thousands of people", and have applied your suggestion. Thank you for offering it,

1982:"By decoding the #DGA domain names, we discovered nearly a hundred domains suspected to be attacked by #UNC2452 #SolarWinds, including universities, governments and high tech companies such as @Intel and @Cisco. Visit our github project to get the script." 3655:

Unabhängig davon habe Swisscom die Überwachung erweitert. "Unsere Sicherheitsexperten analysieren die betroffenen Systeme und haben keine Indizien für einen Missbrauch gefunden. Die Analysen werden weitergeführt", so Swisscom-Mediensprecher Armin Schädeli.

3521:

The shortest (and least gruesome!) of these is "parts", so that's what I chose. I'm open to better suggestions, but one of the conditions of "better" would be that the word not risk the forms of confusion mentioned above that I have already taken pains to

4043:

Bossert, OTOH, was not necessarily part of that debate (and to the extent he approached it, his position was close Smith's). But your edit made him appear to be part of it, and made it seem Smith was opposed to his views. Doubly confusing/wrong, in other

3928:, I think it's an organizational improvement, and that any loose ends can easily be edited and fixed. Please take a good look at it and give yourself a chance to get used to it before making a final decision. But if you disagree, feel free to revert it. 3623:

Unsere Sicherheitsexperten analysieren die betroffenen Systeme und haben bislang keine Indizien für einen tatsächlichen Missbrauch gefunden. Wenn wir Indizien haben, dass ein Missbrauch stattgefunden hat, werden wir die Kunden individuell informieren.

3136:

be included if it can be contextualized in a verifiable and neutral sense as a point of view of the Bigfoot Field Researchers Association and not necessarily a factual statement. The consensus of editors may even be to not include the quote at all.

1897:, I think perhaps you are reading more into that text than is justified. The text is important factual context, appropriate for a "Background" section to help readers (especially future readers in years to come) to locate the events historically. 4047:

I realize that you only created those implications accidentally, but the point is, they were misimplications about a pretty serious topic: has Russia declared (cyber)war on the US? Thanks for being accepting that I needed to correct this,

2996:, with US adversaries in the cyber domain most commonly being China, Iran, North Korea and Russia. "We’ve been advised that the nature of this attack indicates that it may have been conducted by an outside nation state, but SolarWinds has 2775:

that China — not Russia — may be behind the cyber espionage operation against the United States and tried to minimize its impact. claimed the media are “petrified” of “discussing the possibility that it may be China (it may!).” There is

2632:

President Donald Trump was initially silent about the attack; on December 19, 2020, in his first public statement on the topic, he spuriously suggested that China, not Russia, might have been responsible, saying "everything is well under

2522:

If the situation does change (e.g. if non-US governments are also found to have suffered data breaches), then yes, the article should be updated to reflect that. However, the Sunburst trojan should still not necessarily be the focus; see

3486:

When writing the article originally, some days ago now, I, too, considered using the word "agencies". But in the end I rejected it. Here's why. Ultimately, "agencies" would risk confusion, because in the U.S. government context it is an

2900:

I appreciate that you have suggested two options ("advanced persistent threat"; vs saying who blames whom). But you haven't said why you think those are the only two alternatives, nor why you think either of them would be better than my

2518:

At the moment, the only institutions publicly confirmed to have been breached are US ones. Also, the data exfiltration concerns so far published are focused on US federal departments. Until that changes, the article is appropriate as it

1825:

But to fill the logical void, the second paragraph should probably start with "When the attack was reported..." or "At the time of the discovery of the attack..." to reflect the period starting 8 December and not somewhere around March.

1002:

I hope that in the light of the above, you can agree at least that this is an angle that bears mentioning. And that you can also see that I chose the most succinct and uncontroversial summary of that angle that I could find among

720:

If you think we should have a block quote, perhaps we can find a more neutral quote? Although I personally think the section reads fine without it. The rest of the section is nice and factual, which is the perfect tone for an

666:, but the quote does the opposite of that; insofar as it mentions the conspiracy theory, it condemns it in line with mainstream bipartisan consensus. So, on this front, it is definitely not "overly political" in the sense of 1931:

So, I don't think we can escape mentioning that context. And I hope you can see that it's not about taking sides or pointing fingers. It's just about succinctly summarizing the relevant facts, whatever they happen to be.

3659:

Independently from that Swisscom has extended monitoring. "Our security experts are analyzing the affected systems and have not discovered evidence for abuse. The analysis are ongoing", says Swisscom spokesperson Armin

681:

a national embarrassment, whichever side of the aisle you sit on; it is not "overly political" to suggest this. This point about embarrassment is an important point for the article to convey. The quote makes that point

827:

I think that the proper weight for this kind of thing is either to not include it, or to include it with paraphrase and attribution. "The New York Times was critical of Trump for not issuing a statement on the data

3858:

Take a look and see if you like it. The benefits of the new organization are 1) plenty of sub-sections, 2) easy to see if a section is getting too big, and 3) each paragraph is clearer and less of a mix of topics.

4092:, yes, I agree that dividing "Responses" into subsections is the best approach, as long as the implementation of that approach does not risk causing confusion in the mind of the reader. Many thanks to you and to 4622: 1840:

I made it "At the time of the attack becoming public, the U.S. did not have a Senate-confirmed..." Feel free to improve the grammar/vocabulary but I think this solves the irregular representation of chronology.

3322: 2152:

CISA meanwhile, whose top official, Christopher Krebs, was fired for calling the 2020 U.S. Presidential election secure, told FERC that it was overwhelmed and lacked the resources to properly respond, sources

4662: 3373: 773:

The basic claim is undeniably supported by the evidence. Logically speaking, it is a pair of simple premises (or, if you prefer, a single conjunctive premise) with the truth value "true". No fallacy there.

3455:"Parts" reads really oddly to me, unless it's meant to indicate that the attack didn't respect formal legal boundaries between those "parts". I'd suggest "agencies" instead, unless I'm missing something. 4076:

significantly expanded it and placed this debate in its own subsection. I think we pretty clearly need a topic organization rather than a strictly chronological one, which is not at all reader-friendly.

595:

wasn't — the supposed manipulation of votes in an election he had clearly and fairly lost — he was silent on the fact that Russians were hacking the building next door to him: the United States Treasury.

3613:

Hello. Someone deleted Swisscom, probably because sources were not appropriate or understood (German language). Potential sources that Swisscom is infected, but no particular damage has been announced:

205: 1068:. (We might disagree slightly over what exactly the paraphrase should be, but I'm sure we'll find an acceptable compromise/consensus.) I'll try to come back to this in an hour or two. Thanks again, 4677: 4497:

first time, suggesting without evidence that China" mean? I didn't see evidence offered for the culpability of Russia either by US investigators. These are all appeals to authority, why flag one?

3627:

Our security experts analyze the affected systems and have so far not found any evidence of actual abuse. If we have evidence that abuse has taken place, we will inform the customers individually.

3043:

That is a general statement clearly intended by its author to help their readers place the event in context. It is not an attribution of responsibility, or a suspect list, for this specific event.

4504: 4475: 3292: 1382:

Initially, the attack was thought to just affect the U.S. Treasury and the U.S. DoC. So, the article's initial title was "2020 United States Treasury and Department of Commerce data breach".

1223:

Not sure why you're focused on the executive branch's networks, though, given that it is not one of the branches (Pentagon, State, DoC, DHS, Treasury) so far confirmed to have been breached.

309: 4579: 4407: 3508:"Agencies" therefore risks a user mistakenly assuming the first or second sense listed above, which would be misleading. So, "agencies" would seem to be a poor choice of wording, I'm afraid. 4712: 3675: 503: 165: 63: 4642: 4617: 4657: 2908:, even for a lede. Readers will want to learn within the first few sentences who is thought to be behind the attack, but your first option denies this to the reader. It also fails 520: 3494: 2569:

The summary data about victims - like in the example you cited - is just far too minimal and vague at this point to build an article around. Knowledge (XXG) needs at least one

4100:

job than I would have managed!). Anyhow, this second attempt does, in my eyes, constitute an overall improvement for the section, so thank you both again for doing that work!

3276: 3787:(N.B. If we do adopt these criteria, then we would have to keep Swisscom out of the article unless additional evidence emerges that they met one of the two criteria above.) 1713: 2875:. As argued earlier on this page, the position of the Commander in Chief is then notable. If this second option becomes a lengthy mess, we may just keep it in the lede to " 4672: 3374:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/nothing-makes-me-worry-more-about-the-solarwinds-hack-than-trump-now-saying-it-e2-80-99s-e2-80-98under-control-e2-80-99/ar-BB1c4ep0

230: 3352: 4236: 2834: 2665: 2661: 1407: 1098: 4239:

and other widespread security compromises, although the company said they had not been contacted, and had not "taken part or been involved in this attack in any way".

556: 3500:

U.S. federal bodies with "Agency" in the name (CIA, DIA, NSA, ...) irrespective of whether they are "independent agencies of the United States government" (see above);

3314: 1415:

Something like "2020 global network breach" is too vague. Maybe at some point it will be discovered that other notable international network breaches occurred in 2020.

3773:

had second-stage malware deployed on some part of its infrastructure in relation to this episode (indicating that it was deliberately exploited by the attackers); or

3737:~100 non-Federal organizations, internationally, were targeted with second-stage malware after installing trojaned SolarWinds updates. Of these, maybe a third are 4707: 546: 2827:, was reported to be among the worst ever experienced by the U.S, due to the high profile of the targets and the long duration for which the attacker had access. 1612:

The political reaction won't make sense in an article called "Sunburst hack". Most congresspeople don't care a hoot about Sunburst and aren't very interested in

510: 4637: 4612: 4383: 3726:

ever publishes the list. So, we need to focus on notable incidents. (I'm not saying the Swisscom reports aren't notable, btw. I'm making a general point here.)

1529: 1494:, but it seems other vectors were used besides SolarWinds/Sunburst. Plus, the average reader is probably more interested in the impact than the implementation. 942:

tells us anything, it's that each factor matters. So we can't just cherry-pick, and exclude the factor of Trump's cybersecurity decisions. Especially not when

662:

and politicians alike, from both sides of the aisle, have condemned Trump's election conspiracy theory as just that. To support the conspiracy theory would be

424: 146: 3886:

Lose the careful ordering of those sentences, and some of the threads become impossible to follow. (Unless, maybe, you recreate something like the same order

2780:

to suggest that is the case. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said late Friday that Russia was “pretty clearly” behind the operation against the United States.

1523:

80% of the victims are in the US (but due to the global nature of the Web it might have international impact too), government accounts for 18% of the victims

3178: 2725: 1605:

It's not balanced, because other companies' products/vulnerabilities were, and other malware was, also involved. (We'd be unfairly singling out SolarWinds.)

630:

case, such as this one, in which those officials are all inexplicably silent on the matter, Knowledge (XXG) must note that somehow. The quote achieves this.

4717: 4667: 4652: 4408:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-cyber-jetbrains/fbi-probe-of-major-hack-includes-project-management-software-from-jetbrains-sources-idUSKBN29B2RR

3512: 2964:

we should also put in the lede a variant on the Russian claim, kind of a disclaimer that "possibly it is wrong to groundlessly blame Russians right away."

4134:. Put differently: I can see why the editor who inserted the material felt that it probably was relevant to the event; but I also note that readers can't 3899:. Your edit summary says you had finished reorganizing the section; but you have left Smith apparently arguing the converse of Bossert, which is nonsense. 1356: 515: 4697: 4607: 414: 136: 1157:

Also, is there any evidence that firing CISA's executive and quickly replacing him was somehow disruptive to the networks, or decreased cyber security?

243: 225: 71: 1637:

So, I say let's hold our nerve and focus on the long-term encyclopedic nature of the article. But thanks for chipping in, and also for the good links!

4627: 2327: 854: 2180:

CISA analysts for tracking hacking campaigns. ... Ware declined to comment on whether he was asked to leave his position by the Trump administration.

3563: 3466: 3288: 3265: 960:

For all of Trump's wailing about fictitious hacks that stole the election, he has been otherwise notably uncurious about the nation's cybersecurity.

4571: 4440: 2965: 2708: 1620:

of the state and federal breach (which records were stolen or tampered; how many people and projects were affected; how much will it cost to fix),

1345: 633:

Because this is the responses section, readers are also likely to want to know how selected experts in the field reacted - at least as reported by

4702: 4682: 3447: 3395: 2238:

Not easy trying to summarise all that background into a sentence or so. If you have a better wording in mind, I'd be glad to consider it! Thanks,

4138:

that connection explicitly. What do other editors think: should we keep that material or not? Is the connection obvious enough to do so? Thanks,

390: 112: 2716: 645:, the head of state should still be focusing on a conspiracy theory. Knowledge (XXG) needs to convey that somehow, too. The quote achieves this. 1702: 1195:. They only have an acting director. New in post; not Senate-confirmed; not necessarily the right person for the job. See sources quoted above. 1576:). While it is true that sunburst wasn't the only vector, this does seem to be a name that researchers and journalists are coalescing around. 688:

I hope that you will be at least somewhat swayed by these arguments, and will reconsider the deletion. I would be grateful for your thoughts,

486: 447: 2824: 2691:

I agree with your proposal to remove the quote from the lead. And let me just say: "THANK YOU" for all your very good work on this article.

2552: 2503: 3277:

https://www.scmagazine.com/home/security-news/here-are-the-critical-responses-required-of-all-businesses-after-solarwinds-supply-chain-hack/

1714:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-cyber-breach/suspected-russian-hacking-spree-used-another-major-tech-supplier-sources-idUKKBN28R2ZJ

1307: 3542:, Definitely seems fair—thanks for your detailed explanation. I assumed that the rationale would be something to this effect. Perhaps an 4692: 4602: 4167: 3503:

the colloquial sense in which I think you are using the term, which is equivalent to one of the senses of the words "parts" or "bodies".

711:. It is trying to link what is in my opinion two unrelated things: Trump's election interference, and this data breach. It feels like a 3406: 3384: 3120:

entirely consistent with his previous insistence of absolving Russia for everything and deflecting blame to his personal adversaries...

726:

Or idea #2. We could paraphrase the quote. "The New York Times was critical of Trump for not issuing a statement on the data breach." –

4632: 4508: 4246: 2935:

view. (Even if it comes from the President, it's still fringe.) So, I think from a policy perspective that isn't really viable either.

2841:

With that understood, do you now think my proposal to remove the sentence from the lede is fair? If not, please could you explain why?

498: 4418: 386: 373: 347: 95: 58: 4583: 4519:

A recent article supports Trump's statement of Chinese involvement in the cybersecurity breach during the main events in question.

4462: 3679: 185: 67: 1807:

For one, he's the boss. It would be sad if we couldn't blame the boss. Secondly, is there an argument in his favor? Does even one

1293: 861: 494:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

4235:

claimed, through a confidential source, that JetBrains may have had malware embedded in their software that may have led to the

3722:

Why? Because ~18000 SolarWinds customers downloaded the trojaned updates, and we certainly won't include all of them (even if a

3666: 913:

about the scope of the article, and the responsibility for events, in a different thread. But let me pick up on your statement,

760:, so that rebuke does sting. Even outside Knowledge (XXG), I strive to judge the action, not the person. (I am not "anti-Trump" 674:

too far. It does not, for example, bring party politics into the matter. So, it is not "overly political" on this front, either.

4687: 3344: 33: 4647: 3911:

disrespectful to the care I took initially when creating the section!). I hope you understand and won't be offended. Thanks,

3230: 1870: 1595: 1321: 3518:

If "agencies" and "departments" are out, what does that leave us? "Organs", "bodies", and "parts" were all I could think of.

2720: 2262: 2118: 2033: 4020:, not minor IMO. Basically, if Smith is right, then so are Durbin, Romney, et al, and the incident really was, legally, an 3254: 2722: 2610:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2338: 3420:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2727: 1583:

Since we don't have an article for the Sunburst backdoor, there'd be no need for disambiguation. A descriptive title like

3814: 2707:

We could more accurately say it's not finally attributed, with identified experts saying "maybe an outside nation-state"

2624:

about both of them. Here is how the quote stands after some clarity clean-up, but it still unavoidably retains those two

2545:

only 18 percent of the 40 victims identified by Microsoft were government agencies, and 20 percent were outside the US.

1746: 931:

In other words, the attack was deeply political. And in this particular skirmish, the U.S. and its allies lost, big-time.

3557: 3460: 2054: 2480: 1357:

https://www.theverge.com/2020/12/14/22174429/solarwinds-hack-russia-cisa-christopher-krebs-cybersecurity-infrastructure

4587: 4528: 4512: 4342: 4315: 4293: 4270: 4254: 4218: 4191: 4175: 4147: 4126:

mention a topic as relevant background to the breach, then we have grounds to include it. Otherwise, probably not. In

4109: 4096:

for taking a second run at the task. It isn't quite as I would have done it (and in some ways I think you have done a

4080: 4057: 4012: 3989: 3948: 3920: 3874: 3845: 3796: 3746: 3683: 3596: 3569: 3534: 3472: 3205: 3151: 3108: 3081: 3015: 2947: 2888: 2853: 2787:

Trump, in his first public comments on the issue, appeared to undercut Pompeo's remarks in a pair of tweets Saturday,

2742: 2700: 2685: 2589: 2560: 2536: 2511: 2458: 2433: 2414: 2391: 2363: 2274: 2247: 2130: 2081: 2058: 2021: 1999: 1963: 1941: 1850: 1835: 1820: 1801: 1674: 1646: 1597: 1563: 1545: 1518: 1481: 1459: 1433: 1269: 1255: 1232: 1175: 1133: 1110: 1077: 1052: 1019: 894: 877: 848: 807: 741: 697: 600:

David E. Sanger, Nicole Perlroth, Eric Schmitt, Scope of Russian Hack Becomes Clear: Multiple U.S. Agencies Were Hit,

2096:

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) helped to compensate for a staffing shortfall at CISA caused by Trump

292: 4546: 4451: 4429: 4306:

Another update : interview given to Forbes by Shafirov. They had not been contacted by any US agency as of 7th Jan.

2660:. Note: I'm not advocating that Trump's view should not be mentioned. It should, and it is already mentioned in the 1209:

provide cybersecurity tools, incident response services and assessment capabilities to safeguard the '.gov' networks

938:

sources that I cited are saying either) that this is all Trump's fault. There are other factors at play. But if the

3443: 2864: 2328:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-02/trump-campaign-s-unproven-vote-claims-lead-to-cyber-staff-exodus

1101:

section. With any luck, you'll feel I have done an acceptable job of it. If not, do please follow up here. Thanks,

789:, I don't think you would find much disagreement with the content of the quote. So, I don't think it constitutes a 2952:

We're an encyclopedia, not a propaganda mouthpiece. If we really want to introduce selected US government-linked

318:

Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.

4311: 3266:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-18/hackers-lurking-in-networks-for-months-snarl-solarwinds-probes

3243: 2712: 2696: 2556: 2507: 1581: 1334: 4441:

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/jetbrains-denies-involvement-in-the-solarwinds-supply-chain-hack/

1602:

Thanks, but I still think it is problematic on several fronts to name the article after SolarWinds or Sunburst:

1346:

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a34978841/russia-hack-us-government-systems-trump-administration/

4524: 4261:

Thanks. I hope to read those pieces in the next few hours and will mention them in the article if appropriate.

3396:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-19/at-least-200-victims-identified-in-suspected-russian-hacking

2032:

Breach might be worse than expected, as SolarWinds retains 'deleted' credentials in the internal database, per

1786:

problems, and I would be in favor of deleting them. However, I am happy to hear the opinion of other editors. –

1735: 3702: 2066: 2006: 1724: 1182: 610:

Delete overly political blockquote that talks about trump election interference. Not relevant to this article.

39: 4171: 4130:, material was added to the "Background" section that does not meet that criterion and therefore is arguably 1439:

I think "2020 SolarWinds breach" is a pretty good title. That would include the non-US government victims. A

1061:. I'm sorry that I haven't persuaded you that this is not just a "technical" (e.g. computer science) article. 4250: 4007: 3943: 3869: 3840: 3574: 3553: 3480: 3456: 2580:

Don't get me wrong, I appreciate your good intentions. But the other thread already addressed your concern.

2294: 1796: 1777:

Trump after contradicting the latter's claim that the 2020 U.S. Presidential election result was fraudulent.

1703:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-14/u-k-government-nato-join-u-s-in-monitoring-risk-from-hack

1541: 1454: 1250: 1170: 1128: 1047: 843: 736: 4500: 4242: 4163: 3956:, I'm sorry to hear that you aren't willing to finish it off, because that leave me in an awkward position. 3671: 2548: 2499: 2042: 1757: 1207:

CISA builds the national capacity to defend against cyber attacks and works with the federal government to

833:

It looks like you created the article and wrote large parts of it. Thank you for your time and hard work. –

4396: 4307: 4160:

In both articles linked to in the foot notes, only SolarWinds is mentioned – not VMWare, not Microsoft.

2938:

Please can you reconsider whether a middle ground, as I've suggested, might be the better option? Thanks,

1877: 1402:

Something like "2020 SolarWinds breach" doesn't really account for the Office 365 attack vector and would

108: 4476:"Meet The Super Rich Czech Tech Company — And Its Russian CEO —Denying Links To The Huge SolarWinds Hack" 1579: 1065: 4368: 382: 111:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2953: 2656:

So, I suggest we remove the Trump quote (and the sentence containing/paraphrasing it) from the lede as

1950:

I'm fine with the sufficient precision of "late in Trump's presidency". There's such a thing as a bit

3997:, I didn't notice the contradictions that you mentioned. I suspect they are minor. Up to you though. – 2316: 1202:

play a role in protecting the executive branch's networks & especially handling incident response:

3933:

I'm done editing it for now. If you see some small mistakes that I made, feel free to correct them. –

2893:

Thanks, but although have clarified that you disagree with my proposal, you still have not explained

2692: 1554:

will be the right title. But let's wait until more trustworthy sources confirm, before we change it.

1440: 785:

As for the tone, it seems to me to be representative of bipartisan feelings on the topic. Outside of

478: 3407:

https://www.theverge.com/2020/12/19/22190698/trump-downplay-solarwinds-hack-russia-china-mike-pompeo

3385:

https://www.defensenews.com/congress/2020/12/17/no-2-senate-democrat-russia-hack-a-virtual-invasion/

2961: 21: 4520: 3742: 3104: 2429: 2387: 1959: 1925: 1881: 1010:

So, would you now be willing for me to restore the quote? Thanks again for your time and interest.

4419:

https://www.securityweek.com/investigation-launched-role-jetbrains-product-solarwinds-hack-reports

4135: 3127: 3123: 3058: 2987: 2932: 2913: 2657: 2625: 2621: 2121:

adds all sorts of nuance, which leaves me slightly unsure. A second opinion would be appreciated.

1238: 786: 667: 663: 4567: 4093: 4017: 3998: 3953: 3934: 3879: 3860: 3831: 3011: 2884: 2771:

Contradicting his secretary of state and other top officials, President Donald Trump on Saturday

2738: 2270: 2126: 1894: 1846: 1831: 1816: 1787: 1593: 1537: 1487: 1477: 1445: 1406:

need to be changed if other attack vectors are discovered in future - as has been predicted (see

1241: 1161: 1119: 1082: 1058: 1038: 939: 901: 873: 857: 834: 750: 727: 581: 4463:

https://www.natlawreview.com/article/software-development-teams-are-you-using-jetbrains-teamcity

4131: 3890:

each topic's subsection, and direct the reader to other relevant subsections where appropriate.)

3717:

re: organizations breached, we probably need to come up with inclusion criteria for this article

2928: 2669: 1497:

For now, I think the title should be left alone: it fits the facts well enough. If it turns out

462: 441: 2620:, a fellow editor added a quote from Trump to the lede that essentially says two things and is 715:

to me to try to link these two barely related or possibly completely unrelated things together.

3488: 3224: 2305: 1064:

Either way, I'm coming around to your "idea #2", to paraphrase the quote. That approach seems

712: 287: 3691: 3667:

https://www.inside-it.ch/de/post/sunburst-hack-die-kollateralschaeden-in-der-schweiz-20201218

3633: 2957: 2924: 2909: 2860: 2833:

And we also already have a whole section to deal with perpetrator attribution in more depth:

2759: 2730: 2542: 2401:. I figured it was either a nod to CloudBurst (a VM escape vulnerability/exploit); or to the 1783: 790: 757: 708: 4338: 4289: 4266: 4214: 4187: 4143: 4105: 4053: 3985: 3916: 3792: 3592: 3552:

in the lede, articulating some of the points you raise above, would help to clarify things?

3530: 3147: 3077: 2943: 2849: 2681: 2585: 2532: 2454: 2410: 2359: 2243: 2077: 2050: 2017: 1995: 1937: 1670: 1642: 1559: 1514: 1429: 1265: 1228: 1106: 1073: 1015: 890: 803: 693: 3738: 3690:

2A04:EE41:3:3297:6CE5:2E1:F91E:4E21|2A04:EE41:3:3297:6CE5:2E1:F91E:4E21, you might want to

3041:

US adversaries in the cyber domain most commonly being China, Iran, North Korea and Russia.

2574: 2424:

Yes. Hard to keep the code names straight given that they all sound like James Bond films.

813: 4089: 4077: 2397:

FireEye, you mean? Anyway, no, I haven't seen any confirmation of the reason for the name

2065:

Thanks. Do please post back here on the talk page if you notice this getting picked up by

2005:

Thanks. Do please post back here on the talk page if you notice this getting picked up by

1977: 925: 920:

This article is about a multifaceted topic. All the important facets need to be addressed.

4123: 3765: 3723: 3705: 3065: 3054: 2983: 2570: 2069: 2034:

https://malicious.link/post/2020/solarflare-release-password-dumper-for-solarwinds-orion/

2009: 1808: 1185: 1004: 943: 935: 659: 634: 3255:

https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/12/18/russias-alleged-hack-could-be-worst-in-u-s-history/

2637:

As you can see from the cited sources (and plenty of other sources in the article), the

2339:

https://forensicnews.net/forensic-news-roundup-russia-hacks-u-s-government-trump-silent/

1773:

The attack was discovered during the lame duck period of the Presidency of Donald Trump.

1085:

it took me longer to get to than planned, but I have now paraphrased the NYT quote (and

853:

The Trump "government" is so well prepared and so much focused on real threats that his

362: 341: 3907:

unfinished, so to leave it as it stands does a disservice to the reader (and is also a

3754: 3113: 3100: 2425: 2383: 1955: 1391:

the article to its current title: "2020 United States federal government data breach".

1385:

When the known impact widened to many other branches of the U.S. federal government, I

3815:

https://blog.truesec.com/2020/12/17/the-solarwinds-orion-sunburst-supply-chain-attack/

3345:"US under major active cyberattack from Russia, Trump's former security adviser warns" 3206:"Trump downplays massive cyber hack on government after Pompeo links attack to Russia" 1747:

https://blog.truesec.com/2020/12/17/the-solarwinds-orion-sunburst-supply-chain-attack/

812:

Sorry, my friend. I wasn't trying to rebuke or sting. I do appreciate how cordial and

768:

alarm about a fictitious threat, his government might have detected the real threat").

321:

Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

4596: 4563: 3020: 3007: 2880: 2751: 2734: 2266: 2122: 1842: 1827: 1812: 1588: 1491: 1473: 882: 869: 618:

You say that the quote is not relevant. But it is relevant, on at least these counts:

491: 3061:: by contrast with the politicians from Congress's intelligence committees, there's 2481:

https://www.zdnet.com/article/virtual-machine-exploit-lets-attackers-take-over-host/

1501:

of non-Federal organizations were breached too, then I think we should change it to

1260:

Sorry, yes - I was evidently having a brain fart and conflating it with the EOP :-s

707:. Thanks for your comment. I am anti Trump, but I honestly feel this quote violates 652:

You say that the quote is overly political. But it is not, on at least these counts:

4384:"Statement on the story from The New York Times regarding JetBrains and SolarWinds" 3640:

Inside-IT news publication title: “Sunburst Hack: Collateral damage in Switzerland”

3581: 3546: 2402: 1181:

It's not for us to judge the impact of firing CISA's director; that's a matter for

1986: 215: 4547:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cyber-solarwinds-china-exclusive-idUSKBN2A22K8

4452:

https://www.wired.com/story/solarwinds-krebs-nissan-source-code-security-roundup/

4430:

https://www.zdnet.com/article/jetbrains-denies-being-involved-in-solarwinds-hack/

2378:

I haven't seen why SolarEye named the hack SunBurst. Any hard facts on this? Any

4334: 4285: 4262: 4210: 4183: 4139: 4101: 4049: 3994: 3981: 3925: 3912: 3788: 3588: 3587:

as you suggest, and will try to find time to review it if you do. Thanks again,

3539: 3526: 3439: 3143: 3073: 2939: 2845: 2816: 2677: 2581: 2528: 2450: 2406: 2355: 2239: 2073: 2046: 2013: 1991: 1933: 1666: 1638: 1555: 1510: 1425: 1261: 1224: 1115: 1102: 1069: 1011: 886: 865: 799: 704: 689: 3050:

ones who, after being briefed, attributed the attack to Russia with confidence.

1577: 1469: 822:

why are we giving so much weight to statements that try to malign Donald Trump?

195: 175: 87: 52: 3764:

An organization shall be listed as breached, in this article, if at least one

3244:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/16/opinion/fireeye-solarwinds-russia-hack.html

3204:

Stracqualursi, Veronica; Liptak, Kevin; Hansler, Jennifer (19 December 2020).

1394:

Now, even this seems increasingly inaccurate, which raises the question: what

1335:

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/12/solarwinds-trump-hack-fireeye.html

468: 2820: 2566:

Thanks, but I'm aware of that. Did you read the discussion I pointed you to?

2379: 1736:

https://blog.prevasio.com/2020/12/sunburst-backdoor-part-ii-dga-list-of.html

378: 104: 2916:

aspects of the article. So, your first option is a non-starter, I'm afraid.

2573:

for each substantive claim, and there just aren't any so far with anything

1725:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/17/us/politics/russia-cyber-hack-trump.html

1420:

Something like "2020 global Russian cyberattack" might be more appropriate?

490:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 4284:

an attack vector, then absolutely at that point this should be mentioned.

3750: 2295:

https://www.cyberscoop.com/matt-masterson-cisa-resigns-stanford-election/

100: 4367:

Perlroth, Nicole; Sanger, David E.; Barnes, Julian E. (6 January 2021).

3068:

indicating that Trump's China claim is anything other utter speculation.

2919:

Your second option goes the other way: it proposes a lede that would be

2449:

is a company name rather than a code name, but I know what you mean :-)

1758:

https://www.cyberscoop.com/cozy-bear-apt29-solarwinds-russia-persistent/

780:

So, I don't think you can reject the quote on a "logical fallacy" basis.

614:

I would like to respectfully challenge that deletion and its rationale.

4397:

https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/07/jetbrains_solarwinds_accusation/

4369:"Widely Used Software Company May Be Entry Point for Huge U.S. Hacking" 2446: 1916:. I'm trying to contribute to an encyclopedia, not a poison pen letter. 1292:

Sanger, David E.; Perlroth, Nicole; Schmitt, Eric (December 15, 2020).

957:

informative and neutrally-worded than, say, any of these alternatives:

3778:

suffered a supply-chain compromise that put its own customers at risk.

2037: 1294:"Scope of Russian Hack Becomes Clear: Multiple U.S. Agencies Were Hit" 677:

This was a spectacular hack by a repeated foreign aggressor. The hack

277: 2871:, all sources agree on this) and move on, or we go into more detail: 1616:

the state and federal breach occurred. They care much more about the

590:

the following quotation from the "Responses" section of the article:

3577:, thanks. Yes, I'm open to that. I would be happy for you to add an 3515:

parts of the federal government will turn out to have been affected.

3491:. In that context, its valid but mutually exclusive senses include: 3315:"Cyber attack may be 'worst hacking case in the history of America'" 1530:"Microsoft president calls SolarWinds hack an "act of recklessness"" 1237:

In my opinion, the "executive branch" includes all the departments.

1025:

Thanks again for being very courteous throughout this whole process.

155: 2715:, "what Microsoft and FireEye consider to be nation-state hackers" 2405:(a burst of suns), on account of the name of the product affected. 2317:

https://www.cyberscoop.com/chris-krebs-fired-trump-dhs-cyber-wales/

1367: 385:, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the 1536:

The article title will have to change as more info is released.--

3483:, thanks for your comment. Here's how that word came to be used. 3023:, thanks. I slightly resent the implication that my proposal is 2873:

who blames which (foreign) nation without providing any evidence

2256:

None of those citations say that the FERC assistance was needed

2117:. I think that makes this OR and thus require revision. However, 2088:

Is FERC assistance due to Trump actions claim Original Research?

2724:

and the Commander in Chief saying "it may be China (it may!)".

1160:

Again, doesn't seem logical to me. These arguments seem weak. –

949:

As for the NYT quote, I'm still in favour of it. I think it is

3289:"U.S. Agencies Exposed in Attack by Suspected Russian Hackers" 3179:"Trump downplays Russia in first comments on hacking campaign" 2758:

Us using a term term like "spuriously" however is a breach of

2729:

Us using a term term like "spuriously" however is a breach of

915:

I do not think an article about hacking should be so political

15: 3609:

Inclusion criteria for breached organizations (was: Swisscom)

2994:

The sophisticated nature of the hack points to a nation state

276: 214: 194: 174: 154: 2754:, thanks. Taking your substantive points in reverse order: 2306:

https://www.cyberscoop.com/bryan-ware-cisa-dhs-resignation/

860:

was suddenly recalled from a Europe trip to help implement

4623:

C-Class Computer networking articles of Unknown-importance

3851:

I ended up reorganizing the "responses" section just now.

3634:

https://twitter.com/Swisscom_de/status/1339839315518566400

2543:

https://www.wired.com/story/russia-solarwinds-hack-roundup

1308:"O'Brien cuts short Europe trip to address agency hacking" 3047:

SolarWinds has not verified the identity of the attacker.

2797:

We could more accurately say it's not finally attributed.

643:

even after news of perhaps the biggest hack in US history

4663:

C-Class Computer hardware articles of Unknown-importance

3000:

of the attacker," SolarWinds explained in its advisory.

2028:

SolarFlare Release: Password Dumper for SolarWinds Orion

4127: 3895: 3855: 3852: 2801: 2616: 1978:

https://twitter.com/RedDrip7/status/1339168187619790848

1387: 1188:. If they say it was relevant, we need to mention that. 909: 798:

Does it now seem more reasonable to you? Thanks again,

586: 269: 264: 259: 254: 377:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of 4678:

C-Class Computer Security articles of Low-importance

3495:

Independent agencies of the United States government

2100:

Is based on the following text from the references:

1861: 1651:

See this quote, which underscores my previous point:

99:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 3980:start. Thanks for the effort, and apologies again, 3035:

We're an encyclopedia, not a propaganda mouthpiece.

946:

are citing those decisions as potentially relevant.

3694:that user, if you want to hear from them directly. 2990:beliefs is appropriate, like in this last source: 299:Review importance and quality of existing articles 3729:What do I propose? First, some context: it seems 3436:2020 United States federal government data breach 3199: 3197: 3195: 3122:OK, so it seems you accept that Trump's claim is 2668:sections. I'm just saying it should not be given 2641:view among experts in the field is that in fact: 2072:, so we can mention the findings in the article. 2012:, so we can mention the findings in the article. 753:, thanks for the explanation and the suggestions. 369:2020 United States federal government data breach 4713:C-Class United States articles of Low-importance 3429:The first sentence of the lede currently reads: 3172: 3170: 3168: 1632:. Most of which has nothing to do with Sunburst. 302:Identify categories related to Computer Security 4643:C-Class software articles of Unknown-importance 4618:Unknown-importance Computer networking articles 3133: 3004:it has the hallmarks of a Russian hacking (...) 2991: 2813: 2785: 2769: 2711:, "almost certainly the work of a state actor" 2630: 2225: 2209: 2193: 2177: 2161: 2158:Other recent context (not cited, but relevant): 2150: 2139: 2102: 2094: 1987:https://github.com/RedDrip7/SunBurst_DGA_Decode 1905:encyclopedically) in the article as background. 1654: 1205: 986: 971: 958: 592: 4658:Unknown-importance Computer hardware articles 2672:prominence either in the lede or by having a 1771: 8: 4492:China allegation characterized as "spurious" 3882:, yes, I see you didn't wait for an answer! 3760:I propose the following inclusion criteria: 1118:. Looks great. Great job on this article. – 934:Now, I'm not saying (and I don't think the 4556: 4498: 4240: 4161: 3708:should not be removed from articles, so I 3669: 2577:to say about non-US victims of this event. 2546: 2497: 1322:"What We Know About the SolarWinds Breach" 436: 336: 308:Identify articles for creation (see also: 238: 47: 4673:Low-importance Computer Security articles 4557:Addition of 'suspected' in first sentence 3177:Colvin, Jill; Lee, Matthew (2020-12-19). 2912:by deliberately avoiding summarizing non- 2652:Russia (not China) is likely responsible. 1468:, because it's to the point and it's the 531:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States 290:. Please allow some days for processing. 1912:One thing this is not about, for me, is 4539: 4359: 3807: 3448:federal government of the United States 3164: 3116:, thanks for explaining your reasoning. 2856:; edited 06:55, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 2473: 2287: 1695: 1284: 1022:; edited 18:52, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 438: 338: 49: 19: 4505:2601:601:1501:2BD0:49E6:3785:8CBC:EAC0 4280:investigation concludes that TeamCity 4060:; edited 03:53, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 3433: 3355:from the original on December 18, 2020 3325:from the original on December 18, 2020 3295:from the original on December 16, 2020 3222: 3119: 3046: 3040: 3034: 2819:, considered to likely be the work of 2796: 2757: 2417:; edited 16:36, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 1192: 914: 609: 4708:Low-importance United States articles 3126:. That being so, here is the part of 2791:"it may be China" that's responsible. 1811:praise his preparedness or response? 399:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Espionage 121:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computing 7: 4638:Unknown-importance software articles 4613:C-Class Computer networking articles 4580:2601:248:C000:3F:3492:6A55:752C:FAA7 4182:Thanks, I'll look into fixing that. 3444:group backed by a foreign government 3291:. Bloomberg L.P. December 14, 2020. 2606:The following discussion is closed. 1768:More sentences trying to blame Trump 484:This article is within the scope of 93:This article is within the scope of 4040:, etc; see the "Responses" section. 3676:2A04:EE41:3:3297:6CE5:2E1:F91E:4E21 3646:diese Patches bereits installiert. 2927:. It would also necessitate giving 2859:No. Either we just attribute to an 2823:backed by the Russian state agency 2806:indicate this concisely in the lede 2038:https://github.com/mubix/solarflare 38:It is of interest to the following 4718:WikiProject United States articles 4668:C-Class Computer Security articles 4653:C-Class Computer hardware articles 4382:Shafirov, Maxim (6 January 2021). 2649:under control. Quite the opposite. 2524: 1031:in an encyclopedia, in my opinion. 534:Template:WikiProject United States 14: 4698:Low-importance Espionage articles 4608:Low-importance Computing articles 2904:The first of your two options is 2263:Knowledge (XXG):What_SYNTH_is_not 2119:Knowledge (XXG):What_SYNTH_is_not 315:Identify articles for improvement 4628:All Computer networking articles 4474:Brewster, Thomas (Jan 7, 2021). 4201: 4118:How much background is too much? 4032:arguments published recently in 3701:encyclopedic facts sourced from 3618:Swisscom German-language Twitter 3525:I hope this seems fair. Thanks, 3416:The discussion above is closed. 1972:DGA decoding to identify targets 1869: 1587:is not bad, but a little vague. 1550:It is increasingly looking like 471: 461: 440: 361: 340: 86: 51: 20: 3893:A case in point is can be seen 2115:Reason why CISA is overwhelmed. 1368:https://www.cisa.gov/about-cisa 1191:Also, the director hasn't been 637:. The quote achieves this, too. 551:This article has been rated as 419:This article has been rated as 141:This article has been rated as 4703:C-Class United States articles 4683:All Computer Security articles 3712:be OK with restoring Swisscom. 1585:2020 international data breach 1552:2020 international data breach 1507:2020 international data breach 402:Template:WikiProject Espionage 124:Template:WikiProject Computing 1: 4148:16:37, 23 December 2020 (UTC) 4110:07:12, 23 December 2020 (UTC) 4081:17:04, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 4058:03:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 4013:03:38, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 3990:03:29, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 3949:03:11, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 3921:03:04, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 3875:02:47, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 3846:01:46, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 3797:20:47, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 3768:claims that the organization: 3684:19:49, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 3597:19:01, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 3570:18:49, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 3535:18:04, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 3473:17:36, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 3152:06:15, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 3109:19:47, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 3082:06:15, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 3016:10:33, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 3002:Some security experts believe 2948:08:38, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 2889:07:19, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 2854:06:36, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 2743:06:22, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 2701:06:02, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 2686:05:03, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 2590:23:46, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 2561:23:40, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 2537:23:36, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 2512:23:21, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 2459:16:35, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 2434:10:04, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 2415:13:03, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 2392:12:41, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 2364:18:54, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 2275:20:20, 18 December 2020 (UTC) 2248:11:03, 18 December 2020 (UTC) 2131:08:22, 18 December 2020 (UTC) 2082:18:46, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 2059:17:52, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 2022:17:36, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 2000:17:19, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1964:21:11, 17 December 2020 (UTC) 1942:17:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1851:16:09, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1836:16:05, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1821:15:05, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1802:12:01, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1675:22:22, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 1647:07:15, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 1598:03:15, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 1564:15:29, 18 December 2020 (UTC) 1546:10:47, 18 December 2020 (UTC) 1519:21:56, 17 December 2020 (UTC) 1482:14:57, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1460:11:22, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1434:07:38, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1270:23:58, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1256:22:21, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1233:22:15, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1176:19:12, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1134:15:53, 17 December 2020 (UTC) 1111:10:10, 17 December 2020 (UTC) 1078:20:25, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1053:19:08, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 1020:18:43, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 895:18:48, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 878:14:25, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 849:13:42, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 808:13:10, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 742:02:16, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 698:01:47, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 577:Deletion of "Responses" quote 286:will be generated shortly by 244:WikiProject Computer Security 226:WikiProject Computer Security 223:This article is supported by 203:This article is supported by 183:This article is supported by 163:This article is supported by 115:and see a list of open tasks. 4588:20:01, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 4529:21:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC) 4513:01:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC) 4343:19:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC) 4316:07:02, 13 January 2021 (UTC) 4294:06:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC) 4271:18:12, 11 January 2021 (UTC) 4219:05:21, 12 January 2021 (UTC) 4192:21:44, 11 January 2021 (UTC) 3130:relevant to this discussion: 2764:Not given the cited sources: 2382:out there, for that matter? 2136:There's also (again, cited): 1424:I would welcome good ideas! 1240:But good point about CISA. – 868:, my hat off for your work. 206:Computer hardware task force 4255:23:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC) 4176:10:47, 4 January 2021 (UTC) 3747:College of Law and Business 2789:suggesting without evidence 2676:copy of it in the article. 1066:indisputably NPOV-compliant 4734: 4693:C-Class Espionage articles 4603:C-Class Computing articles 3229:: CS1 maint: url-status ( 2865:advanced persistent threat 2773:suggested without evidence 2719:, officials saying Russia 557:project's importance scale 425:project's importance scale 147:project's importance scale 4633:C-Class software articles 3697:In general, I agree that 3446:on multiple parts of the 2998:not verified the identity 1919:That said, the matter of 1528:Dan Goodin (2020-12-18). 550: 487:WikiProject United States 456: 418: 356: 237: 222: 202: 182: 162: 140: 81: 46: 4572:16:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 3418:Please do not modify it. 3319:Las Vegas Review-Journal 2608:Please do not modify it. 1954:much context after all! 608:Your edit summary said, 492:United States of America 2982:phrasing, prioritizing 1198:Pretty clear that CISA 910:addressed your concerns 904:, thanks for the reply. 389:, or contribute to the 371:is within the scope of 4688:All Computing articles 3960:would added them into. 3425:Is "parts" deliberate? 3138: 3006: 2829: 2793: 2782: 2635: 2235: 2219: 2203: 2187: 2171: 2155: 2144: 2107: 2098: 1878:President Harry Truman 1779: 1663: 1220: 999: 985: 970: 862:an Obama-era directive 641:It is noteworthy that 606: 537:United States articles 281: 219: 199: 179: 159: 109:information technology 28:This article is rated 4648:All Software articles 3972:the end of the year). 3351:. December 17, 2020. 3321:. December 17, 2020. 2713:(Deutsche Welle view) 1503:2020 U.S. data breach 1212:operators nationwide. 374:WikiProject Espionage 280: 218: 198: 178: 166:Networking task force 158: 96:WikiProject Computing 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 3784:How does that sound? 3438:was the result of a 2956:claims not based on 2600:Trump quote in lede? 1882:The buck stops here! 1574:Sunburst cyberattack 1509:as the case may be. 479:United States portal 305:Tag related articles 242:Things you can help 186:WikiProject Software 3825:"Responses" section 3743:Capilano University 2960:evidence, then for 756:I strive to uphold 505:Articles Requested! 293:More information... 4371:– via NYTimes.com. 4153:Role of SolarWinds 4128:this pair of edits 3575:AleatoryPonderings 3554:AleatoryPonderings 3481:AleatoryPonderings 3457:AleatoryPonderings 3181:. Associated Press 3094:Fringe or not, he 3031:, but moving on... 2717:(BleepingComputer) 2609: 1441:google news search 1296:– via NYTimes.com. 940:Swiss cheese model 602:The New York Times 584:, I note that you 405:Espionage articles 282: 220: 200: 180: 160: 127:Computing articles 34:content assessment 4515: 4503:comment added by 4257: 4245:comment added by 4227:Role of JetBrains 4178: 4166:comment added by 4011: 3947: 3873: 3844: 3686: 3674:comment added by 3037:Exactly my point. 2867:" (which implies 2607: 2563: 2551:comment added by 2514: 2502:comment added by 2147:and (also cited): 2111:Trump fired Krebs 2045:comment added by 1891: 1890: 1880:with desk sign: " 1800: 1568:I'd also support 1458: 1254: 1174: 1132: 1051: 847: 740: 571: 570: 567: 566: 563: 562: 435: 434: 431: 430: 335: 334: 331: 330: 327: 326: 4725: 4549: 4544: 4484: 4483: 4471: 4465: 4460: 4454: 4449: 4443: 4438: 4432: 4427: 4421: 4416: 4410: 4405: 4399: 4394: 4388: 4387: 4379: 4373: 4372: 4364: 4209: 4205: 4204: 4005: 4003: 3941: 3939: 3898: 3867: 3865: 3838: 3836: 3817: 3812: 3586: 3580: 3551: 3545: 3409: 3404: 3398: 3393: 3387: 3382: 3376: 3371: 3365: 3364: 3362: 3360: 3341: 3335: 3334: 3332: 3330: 3311: 3305: 3304: 3302: 3300: 3285: 3279: 3274: 3268: 3263: 3257: 3252: 3246: 3241: 3235: 3234: 3228: 3220: 3218: 3216: 3201: 3190: 3189: 3187: 3186: 3174: 2804: 2619: 2483: 2478: 2341: 2336: 2330: 2325: 2319: 2314: 2308: 2303: 2297: 2292: 2233: 2217: 2201: 2185: 2169: 2061: 1873: 1862: 1794: 1792: 1760: 1755: 1749: 1744: 1738: 1733: 1727: 1722: 1716: 1711: 1705: 1700: 1661: 1591: 1533: 1452: 1450: 1390: 1370: 1365: 1359: 1354: 1348: 1343: 1337: 1332: 1326: 1325: 1318: 1312: 1311: 1304: 1298: 1297: 1289: 1248: 1246: 1218: 1193:quickly replaced 1168: 1166: 1126: 1124: 1045: 1043: 997: 983: 968: 912: 841: 839: 734: 732: 604: 589: 539: 538: 535: 532: 529: 481: 476: 475: 474: 465: 458: 457: 452: 444: 437: 407: 406: 403: 400: 397: 365: 358: 357: 352: 344: 337: 310:Article requests 295: 239: 129: 128: 125: 122: 119: 90: 83: 82: 77: 74: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 4733: 4732: 4728: 4727: 4726: 4724: 4723: 4722: 4593: 4592: 4559: 4554: 4553: 4552: 4545: 4541: 4494: 4489: 4488: 4487: 4473: 4472: 4468: 4461: 4457: 4450: 4446: 4439: 4435: 4428: 4424: 4417: 4413: 4406: 4402: 4395: 4391: 4381: 4380: 4376: 4366: 4365: 4361: 4308:Ujwal.Xankill3r 4237:SolarWinds hack 4229: 4202: 4200: 4155: 4120: 4031: 3999: 3935: 3894: 3861: 3832: 3827: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3813: 3809: 3611: 3584: 3578: 3549: 3543: 3489:overloaded word 3427: 3422: 3421: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3405: 3401: 3394: 3390: 3383: 3379: 3372: 3368: 3358: 3356: 3349:The Independent 3343: 3342: 3338: 3328: 3326: 3313: 3312: 3308: 3298: 3296: 3287: 3286: 3282: 3275: 3271: 3264: 3260: 3253: 3249: 3242: 3238: 3221: 3214: 3212: 3203: 3202: 3193: 3184: 3182: 3176: 3175: 3166: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2968:The Independent 2923:to comply with 2874: 2838: 2807: 2800: 2693:UnitedStatesian 2615: 2612: 2602: 2553:185.183.147.118 2504:185.183.147.118 2493: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2479: 2475: 2400: 2376: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2337: 2333: 2326: 2322: 2315: 2311: 2304: 2300: 2293: 2289: 2234: 2232: 2222:and (likewise): 2218: 2216: 2206:and (likewise): 2202: 2200: 2190:and (likewise): 2186: 2184: 2174:and (likewise): 2170: 2168: 2113:is necessarily 2090: 2040: 2030: 1974: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1875: 1874: 1809:reliable source 1788: 1770: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1756: 1752: 1745: 1741: 1734: 1730: 1723: 1719: 1712: 1708: 1701: 1697: 1662: 1660: 1589: 1532:. Ars Technica. 1527: 1446: 1386: 1380: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1366: 1362: 1355: 1351: 1344: 1340: 1333: 1329: 1320: 1319: 1315: 1306: 1305: 1301: 1291: 1290: 1286: 1242: 1219: 1216: 1162: 1120: 1039: 998: 993: 984: 978: 969: 964: 956: 952: 926:second Cold War 908: 835: 728: 713:logical fallacy 605: 599: 585: 579: 536: 533: 530: 527: 526: 525: 511:Become a Member 477: 472: 470: 450: 404: 401: 398: 395: 394: 350: 296: 291: 274: 126: 123: 120: 117: 116: 75: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 4731: 4729: 4721: 4720: 4715: 4710: 4705: 4700: 4695: 4690: 4685: 4680: 4675: 4670: 4665: 4660: 4655: 4650: 4645: 4640: 4635: 4630: 4625: 4620: 4615: 4610: 4605: 4595: 4594: 4591: 4590: 4558: 4555: 4551: 4550: 4538: 4537: 4533: 4532: 4531: 4521:Phillip Samuel 4493: 4490: 4486: 4485: 4466: 4455: 4444: 4433: 4422: 4411: 4400: 4389: 4374: 4358: 4357: 4353: 4352: 4351: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4346: 4345: 4323: 4322: 4321: 4320: 4319: 4318: 4299: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4274: 4273: 4233:New York Times 4228: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4222: 4221: 4195: 4194: 4154: 4151: 4119: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4084: 4083: 4072: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4065: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4045: 4041: 4029: 3977: 3973: 3965: 3961: 3957: 3931: 3929: 3900: 3891: 3883: 3826: 3823: 3819: 3818: 3806: 3805: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3785: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3775: 3761: 3758: 3755:Signature Bank 3727: 3720: 3713: 3703:WP:INDEPENDENT 3695: 3664: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3653: 3652: 3651: 3638: 3631: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3610: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3523: 3519: 3516: 3509: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3501: 3498: 3484: 3453: 3452: 3426: 3423: 3415: 3411: 3410: 3399: 3388: 3377: 3366: 3336: 3306: 3280: 3269: 3258: 3247: 3236: 3191: 3163: 3162: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3139: 3131: 3117: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3069: 3051: 3044: 3038: 3032: 3018: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2972: 2936: 2917: 2902: 2898: 2872: 2869:a nation state 2842: 2839: 2832: 2830: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2805: 2783: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2746: 2745: 2704: 2703: 2654: 2653: 2650: 2645:Everything is 2613: 2604: 2603: 2601: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2578: 2567: 2525:#Article title 2520: 2492: 2489: 2485: 2484: 2472: 2471: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2419: 2418: 2398: 2375: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2343: 2342: 2331: 2320: 2309: 2298: 2286: 2285: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2251: 2250: 2236: 2230: 2223: 2220: 2214: 2207: 2204: 2198: 2191: 2188: 2182: 2175: 2172: 2166: 2159: 2156: 2148: 2145: 2137: 2109:I don't think 2089: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2067:WP:INDEPENDENT 2029: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2007:WP:INDEPENDENT 1973: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1945: 1944: 1929: 1926:the buck stops 1921:responsibility 1917: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1889: 1888: 1876: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1860: 1859: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1775: 1774: 1769: 1766: 1762: 1761: 1750: 1739: 1728: 1717: 1706: 1694: 1693: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1664: 1658: 1652: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1610: 1606: 1566: 1534: 1524: 1495: 1462: 1422: 1421: 1417: 1416: 1412: 1411: 1398:the title be? 1379: 1376: 1372: 1371: 1360: 1349: 1338: 1327: 1313: 1299: 1283: 1282: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1221: 1214: 1203: 1196: 1189: 1183:WP:INDEPENDENT 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1062: 1034: 1032: 1028: 1026: 1008: 1000: 991: 976: 962: 954: 950: 947: 932: 929: 921: 918: 905: 899: 898: 897: 831: 829: 825: 823: 819: 817: 796: 795: 794: 782: 781: 778: 774: 770: 769: 754: 745: 744: 724: 722: 718: 716: 686: 685: 684: 683: 675: 671: 654: 653: 649: 648: 647: 646: 638: 631: 620: 619: 597: 578: 575: 573: 569: 568: 565: 564: 561: 560: 553:Low-importance 549: 543: 542: 540: 524: 523: 518: 513: 508: 501: 499:Template Usage 495: 483: 482: 466: 454: 453: 451:Low‑importance 445: 433: 432: 429: 428: 421:Low-importance 417: 411: 410: 408: 366: 354: 353: 351:Low‑importance 345: 333: 332: 329: 328: 325: 324: 323: 322: 319: 316: 313: 306: 303: 300: 284:Article alerts 275: 273: 272: 267: 262: 257: 251: 248: 247: 235: 234: 231:Low-importance 221: 211: 210: 201: 191: 190: 181: 171: 170: 161: 151: 150: 143:Low-importance 139: 133: 132: 130: 113:the discussion 91: 79: 78: 76:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4730: 4719: 4716: 4714: 4711: 4709: 4706: 4704: 4701: 4699: 4696: 4694: 4691: 4689: 4686: 4684: 4681: 4679: 4676: 4674: 4671: 4669: 4666: 4664: 4661: 4659: 4656: 4654: 4651: 4649: 4646: 4644: 4641: 4639: 4636: 4634: 4631: 4629: 4626: 4624: 4621: 4619: 4616: 4614: 4611: 4609: 4606: 4604: 4601: 4600: 4598: 4589: 4585: 4581: 4576: 4575: 4574: 4573: 4569: 4565: 4562:globally..." 4548: 4543: 4540: 4536: 4530: 4526: 4522: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4514: 4510: 4506: 4502: 4491: 4481: 4477: 4470: 4467: 4464: 4459: 4456: 4453: 4448: 4445: 4442: 4437: 4434: 4431: 4426: 4423: 4420: 4415: 4412: 4409: 4404: 4401: 4398: 4393: 4390: 4385: 4378: 4375: 4370: 4363: 4360: 4356: 4344: 4340: 4336: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4326: 4325: 4324: 4317: 4313: 4309: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4300: 4295: 4291: 4287: 4283: 4278: 4277: 4276: 4275: 4272: 4268: 4264: 4260: 4259: 4258: 4256: 4252: 4248: 4244: 4238: 4234: 4226: 4220: 4216: 4212: 4208: 4199: 4198: 4197: 4196: 4193: 4189: 4185: 4181: 4180: 4179: 4177: 4173: 4169: 4168:79.210.164.49 4165: 4158: 4152: 4150: 4149: 4145: 4141: 4137: 4133: 4129: 4125: 4117: 4111: 4107: 4103: 4099: 4095: 4094:Novem Linguae 4091: 4088: 4087: 4086: 4085: 4082: 4079: 4074: 4073: 4059: 4055: 4051: 4046: 4042: 4039: 4035: 4027: 4023: 4019: 4018:Novem Linguae 4016: 4015: 4014: 4009: 4004: 4002: 4001:Novem Linguae 3996: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3987: 3983: 3978: 3974: 3970: 3966: 3962: 3958: 3955: 3954:Novem Linguae 3952: 3951: 3950: 3945: 3940: 3938: 3937:Novem Linguae 3932: 3930: 3927: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3918: 3914: 3910: 3906: 3901: 3897: 3892: 3889: 3884: 3881: 3880:Novem Linguae 3878: 3877: 3876: 3871: 3866: 3864: 3863:Novem Linguae 3857: 3854: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3842: 3837: 3835: 3834:Novem Linguae 3824: 3816: 3811: 3808: 3804: 3798: 3794: 3790: 3786: 3783: 3779: 3776: 3774: 3771: 3770: 3769: 3767: 3762: 3759: 3756: 3752: 3748: 3744: 3740: 3736: 3732: 3728: 3725: 3721: 3718: 3714: 3711: 3707: 3704: 3700: 3696: 3693: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3685: 3681: 3677: 3673: 3668: 3658: 3657: 3654: 3648: 3647: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3636: 3635: 3626: 3625: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3615: 3608: 3598: 3594: 3590: 3583: 3576: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3567: 3566: 3561: 3560: 3555: 3548: 3541: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3532: 3528: 3524: 3520: 3517: 3514: 3510: 3507: 3502: 3499: 3496: 3493: 3492: 3490: 3485: 3482: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3470: 3469: 3464: 3463: 3458: 3451: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3424: 3419: 3408: 3403: 3400: 3397: 3392: 3389: 3386: 3381: 3378: 3375: 3370: 3367: 3354: 3350: 3346: 3340: 3337: 3324: 3320: 3316: 3310: 3307: 3294: 3290: 3284: 3281: 3278: 3273: 3270: 3267: 3262: 3259: 3256: 3251: 3248: 3245: 3240: 3237: 3232: 3226: 3211: 3207: 3200: 3198: 3196: 3192: 3180: 3173: 3171: 3169: 3165: 3161: 3153: 3149: 3145: 3140: 3137: 3132: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3118: 3115: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3097: 3093: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3070: 3067: 3064: 3060: 3056: 3052: 3048: 3045: 3042: 3039: 3036: 3033: 3030: 3026: 3022: 3019: 3017: 3013: 3009: 3005: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2971: 2969: 2963: 2959: 2955: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2937: 2934: 2930: 2926: 2922: 2918: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2899: 2896: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2886: 2882: 2878: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2857: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2840: 2836: 2831: 2828: 2826: 2822: 2818: 2812: 2803: 2798: 2795: 2794: 2792: 2790: 2784: 2781: 2779: 2774: 2768: 2763: 2761: 2756: 2755: 2753: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2744: 2740: 2736: 2732: 2728: 2726: 2723: 2721: 2718: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2705: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2651: 2648: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2640: 2634: 2629: 2627: 2623: 2618: 2611: 2599: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2565: 2564: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2544: 2541:According to 2540: 2539: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2521: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2490: 2482: 2477: 2474: 2470: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2373: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2340: 2335: 2332: 2329: 2324: 2321: 2318: 2313: 2310: 2307: 2302: 2299: 2296: 2291: 2288: 2284: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2259: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2229: 2224: 2221: 2213: 2208: 2205: 2197: 2192: 2189: 2181: 2176: 2173: 2165: 2160: 2157: 2154: 2149: 2146: 2143: 2138: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2106: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2068: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2039: 2035: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2008: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1988: 1985:Github page: 1983: 1980: 1979: 1971: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1930: 1927: 1922: 1918: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1896: 1895:Novem_Linguae 1893: 1892: 1883: 1879: 1872: 1864: 1863: 1858: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1798: 1793: 1791: 1790:Novem Linguae 1785: 1778: 1767: 1759: 1754: 1751: 1748: 1743: 1740: 1737: 1732: 1729: 1726: 1721: 1718: 1715: 1710: 1707: 1704: 1699: 1696: 1692: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1665: 1657: 1653: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1631: 1627: 1624:it happened, 1623: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1604: 1603: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1596: 1594: 1592: 1586: 1582: 1580: 1578: 1575: 1571: 1570:Sunburst hack 1567: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1525: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1493: 1489: 1488:Novem_Linguae 1485: 1484: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1470:BBC catchline 1467: 1466:Sunburst hack 1463: 1461: 1456: 1451: 1449: 1448:Novem Linguae 1442: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1419: 1418: 1414: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1397: 1392: 1389: 1383: 1378:Article title 1377: 1369: 1364: 1361: 1358: 1353: 1350: 1347: 1342: 1339: 1336: 1331: 1328: 1323: 1317: 1314: 1309: 1303: 1300: 1295: 1288: 1285: 1281: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1252: 1247: 1245: 1244:Novem Linguae 1239: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1213: 1210: 1204: 1201: 1197: 1194: 1190: 1187: 1184: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1172: 1167: 1165: 1164:Novem Linguae 1158: 1155: 1135: 1130: 1125: 1123: 1122:Novem Linguae 1117: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1083:Novem_Linguae 1081: 1080: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1060: 1059:Novem_Linguae 1056: 1055: 1054: 1049: 1044: 1042: 1041:Novem Linguae 1035: 1033: 1029: 1027: 1024: 1023: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1006: 1001: 996: 990: 981: 975: 967: 961: 948: 945: 941: 937: 933: 930: 927: 922: 919: 916: 911: 906: 903: 902:Novem_Linguae 900: 896: 892: 888: 885:, thanks :-) 884: 881: 880: 879: 875: 871: 867: 863: 859: 856: 852: 851: 850: 845: 840: 838: 837:Novem Linguae 832: 830: 826: 824: 820: 818: 815: 811: 810: 809: 805: 801: 797: 792: 788: 784: 783: 779: 775: 772: 771: 766: 765: 763: 759: 755: 752: 751:Novem_Linguae 749: 748: 747: 746: 743: 738: 733: 731: 730:Novem Linguae 725: 723: 721:encyclopedia. 719: 717: 714: 710: 706: 702: 701: 700: 699: 695: 691: 680: 676: 672: 669: 665: 661: 658: 657: 656: 655: 651: 650: 644: 639: 636: 632: 629: 628:extraordinary 624: 623: 622: 621: 617: 616: 615: 612: 611: 603: 596: 591: 588: 583: 582:Novem Linguae 576: 574: 558: 554: 548: 545: 544: 541: 528:United States 522: 519: 517: 514: 512: 509: 507: 506: 502: 500: 497: 496: 493: 489: 488: 480: 469: 467: 464: 460: 459: 455: 449: 448:United States 446: 443: 439: 426: 422: 416: 413: 412: 409: 392: 388: 384: 380: 376: 375: 370: 367: 364: 360: 359: 355: 349: 346: 343: 339: 320: 317: 314: 311: 307: 304: 301: 298: 297: 294: 289: 285: 279: 271: 268: 266: 263: 261: 258: 256: 253: 252: 250: 249: 245: 241: 240: 236: 232: 229:(assessed as 228: 227: 217: 213: 212: 208: 207: 197: 193: 192: 188: 187: 177: 173: 172: 168: 167: 157: 153: 152: 148: 144: 138: 135: 134: 131: 114: 110: 106: 102: 98: 97: 92: 89: 85: 84: 80: 73: 69: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 4560: 4542: 4534: 4499:— Preceding 4495: 4479: 4469: 4458: 4447: 4436: 4425: 4414: 4403: 4392: 4377: 4362: 4354: 4281: 4247:139.71.144.2 4241:— Preceding 4232: 4231:In 2021 the 4230: 4206: 4162:— Preceding 4159: 4156: 4121: 4097: 4038:The Dispatch 4037: 4033: 4025: 4024:(not merely 4021: 4000: 3968: 3936: 3908: 3904: 3887: 3862: 3833: 3828: 3810: 3802: 3777: 3772: 3763: 3734: 3730: 3716: 3709: 3698: 3670:— Preceding 3665: 3639: 3637: 3632: 3617: 3616: 3612: 3564: 3558: 3513:departmental 3467: 3461: 3454: 3435: 3428: 3417: 3402: 3391: 3380: 3369: 3359:December 17, 3357:. Retrieved 3348: 3339: 3329:December 18, 3327:. Retrieved 3318: 3309: 3299:December 17, 3297:. Retrieved 3283: 3272: 3261: 3250: 3239: 3213:. Retrieved 3209: 3183:. Retrieved 3159: 3134: 3095: 3062: 3028: 3024: 2992: 2979: 2975: 2967: 2931:weight to a 2920: 2905: 2894: 2876: 2868: 2814: 2788: 2786: 2777: 2772: 2770: 2709:(SolarWinds) 2673: 2655: 2646: 2639:overwhelming 2638: 2636: 2631: 2614: 2605: 2547:— Preceding 2498:— Preceding 2494: 2476: 2468: 2403:Orion Nebula 2377: 2374:Nomenclature 2334: 2323: 2312: 2301: 2290: 2282: 2257: 2226: 2210: 2194: 2178: 2162: 2151: 2140: 2114: 2110: 2108: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2041:— Preceding 2031: 1990: 1984: 1981: 1975: 1951: 1920: 1913: 1789: 1780: 1772: 1753: 1742: 1731: 1720: 1709: 1698: 1690: 1655: 1630:how to react 1629: 1628:did it, and 1625: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1584: 1573: 1569: 1551: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1465: 1447: 1423: 1403: 1395: 1393: 1384: 1381: 1363: 1352: 1341: 1330: 1316: 1302: 1287: 1279: 1243: 1208: 1206: 1199: 1163: 1159: 1156: 1152: 1121: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1040: 994: 987: 979: 972: 965: 959: 836: 761: 729: 687: 678: 642: 627: 613: 607: 601: 593: 580: 572: 552: 516:Project Talk 504: 485: 420: 387:project page 383:intelligence 372: 368: 283: 224: 204: 184: 164: 142: 94: 40:WikiProjects 4030:contrasting 3440:cyberattack 3215:19 December 2986:facts over 2954:WP:PARTISAN 2921:too verbose 2817:data breach 2778:no evidence 2491:US-focused? 2142:government. 2092:This line: 1408:Methodology 1310:. Politico. 907:I somewhat 4597:Categories 4535:References 4355:References 4090:Neutrality 4078:Neutrality 3803:References 3185:2020-12-20 3160:References 2962:WP:BALANCE 2802:already do 2469:References 2380:backronyms 2283:References 1909:inclusion. 1901:replaced)? 1691:References 1404:definitely 1324:. NextGov. 1280:References 864:. And yes 682:concisely. 391:discussion 64:Networking 4136:WP:VERIFY 4026:espionage 3715:However, 3128:WP:FRINGE 3124:WP:FRINGE 3114:Soibangla 3101:soibangla 3059:WP:ATTRIB 3029:illogical 3025:imprudent 2988:WP:ATTRIB 2933:WP:FRINGE 2914:WP:FRINGE 2906:too terse 2901:proposal. 2835:#Suspects 2821:Cozy Bear 2666:Responses 2658:WP:FRINGE 2633:control". 2626:WP:FRINGE 2622:WP:FRINGE 2426:kencf0618 2384:kencf0618 1956:kencf0618 1526:source: 1464:I go for 1099:Responses 1097:) in the 1087:The Verge 995:The Verge 955:concisely 787:WP:FRINGE 668:WP:FRINGE 664:WP:FRINGE 396:Espionage 379:espionage 348:Espionage 288:AAlertBot 118:Computing 105:computing 101:computers 59:Computing 4564:Dhawk790 4501:unsigned 4243:unsigned 4164:unsigned 4132:WP:SYNTH 3751:Mediatek 3735:at least 3699:relevant 3672:unsigned 3660:Schädeli 3353:Archived 3323:Archived 3293:Archived 3225:cite web 3021:Wakari07 3008:Wakari07 2929:WP:UNDUE 2881:Wakari07 2844:Thanks, 2752:Wakari07 2735:Wakari07 2670:WP:UNDUE 2662:Suspects 2628:claims: 2549:unsigned 2500:unsigned 2399:Sunburst 2267:Jcurious 2123:Jcurious 2055:contribs 2043:unsigned 1843:Wakari07 1828:Wakari07 1813:Wakari07 1590:gobonobo 1492:Wakari07 1486:Thanks, 1474:Wakari07 1057:Thanks, 883:Wakari07 870:Wakari07 828:breach." 816:you are. 777:fallacy. 72:Security 68:Software 3964:stands. 3739:notable 3692:WP:PING 3053:As for 2980:logical 2976:prudent 2958:WP:SPOV 2925:WP:LEDE 2910:WP:LEDE 2861:WP:NPOV 2760:WP:NPOV 2731:WP:NPOV 2575:notable 2519:stands. 2447:FireEye 2258:because 1784:WP:NPOV 1095:Esquire 858:O'Brien 793:breach. 791:WP:NPOV 758:WP:NPOV 709:WP:NPOV 587:deleted 555:on the 423:on the 260:history 145:on the 30:C-class 4480:Forbes 4335:Zazpot 4286:Zazpot 4263:Zazpot 4211:Zazpot 4184:Zazpot 4140:Zazpot 4102:Zazpot 4098:better 4050:Zazpot 4044:words. 4022:attack 3995:Zazpot 3982:Zazpot 3969:strong 3926:Zazpot 3913:Zazpot 3909:little 3888:within 3853:Before 3789:Zazpot 3757:, etc. 3731:likely 3589:Zazpot 3540:Zazpot 3527:Zazpot 3522:avoid. 3144:Zazpot 3074:Zazpot 2940:Zazpot 2877:an APT 2846:Zazpot 2678:Zazpot 2582:Zazpot 2529:Zazpot 2451:Zazpot 2407:Zazpot 2356:Zazpot 2240:Zazpot 2105:weeks. 2074:Zazpot 2047:Maslen 2014:Zazpot 1992:Maslen 1934:Zazpot 1667:Zazpot 1639:Zazpot 1618:impact 1556:Zazpot 1538:vityok 1511:Zazpot 1426:Zazpot 1396:should 1262:Zazpot 1225:Zazpot 1116:Zazpot 1103:Zazpot 1093:, and 1070:Zazpot 1012:Zazpot 980:Esquir 887:Zazpot 866:Zazpot 814:WP:AGF 800:Zazpot 762:per se 705:Zazpot 690:Zazpot 521:Alerts 107:, and 36:scale. 4124:WP:RS 4034:Wired 3976:made. 3856:After 3766:WP:RS 3733:that 3724:WP:RS 3710:might 3706:WP:RS 3442:by a 3066:WP:RS 3055:WP:RS 2984:WP:RS 2674:third 2571:WP:RS 2153:said. 2070:WP:RS 2010:WP:RS 1976:Per: 1914:blame 1388:moved 1186:WP:RS 1091:Slate 1005:WP:RS 966:Slate 953:more 944:WP:RS 936:WP:RS 660:WP:RS 635:WP:RS 270:purge 265:watch 246:with: 4584:talk 4568:talk 4525:talk 4509:talk 4339:talk 4312:talk 4290:talk 4267:talk 4251:talk 4215:talk 4207:Done 4188:talk 4172:talk 4144:talk 4106:talk 4054:talk 4036:and 4008:talk 3986:talk 3944:talk 3917:talk 3896:here 3870:talk 3841:talk 3793:talk 3680:talk 3593:talk 3531:talk 3434:The 3361:2020 3331:2020 3301:2020 3231:link 3217:2020 3148:talk 3105:talk 3078:talk 3012:talk 2944:talk 2885:talk 2850:talk 2815:The 2739:talk 2697:talk 2682:talk 2664:and 2617:Here 2586:talk 2557:talk 2533:talk 2508:talk 2455:talk 2430:talk 2411:talk 2388:talk 2360:talk 2271:talk 2244:talk 2127:talk 2078:talk 2051:talk 2036:and 2018:talk 1996:talk 1960:talk 1938:talk 1847:talk 1832:talk 1817:talk 1797:talk 1671:talk 1643:talk 1572:(or 1560:talk 1542:talk 1515:talk 1499:lots 1490:and 1478:talk 1455:talk 1430:talk 1266:talk 1251:talk 1229:talk 1217:CISA 1200:does 1171:talk 1129:talk 1107:talk 1074:talk 1048:talk 1016:talk 951:much 891:talk 874:talk 844:talk 804:talk 737:talk 703:Hey 694:talk 255:edit 4282:was 4122:If 3967:My 3582:efn 3565:!!! 3562:) ( 3559:??? 3547:efn 3468:!!! 3465:) ( 3462:??? 3210:CNN 3057:or 3027:or 2895:why 2879:". 2825:SVR 2799:We 2647:not 2265:. 1952:too 1626:who 1622:why 1614:how 1505:or 855:NSA 764:.) 547:Low 415:Low 137:Low 4599:: 4586:) 4570:) 4527:) 4511:) 4478:. 4341:) 4314:) 4292:) 4269:) 4253:) 4217:) 4190:) 4174:) 4146:) 4108:) 4056:) 3988:) 3919:) 3905:is 3795:) 3753:, 3749:, 3745:, 3741:: 3682:) 3595:) 3585:}} 3579:{{ 3568:) 3550:}} 3544:{{ 3533:) 3471:) 3347:. 3317:. 3227:}} 3223:{{ 3208:. 3194:^ 3167:^ 3150:) 3107:) 3096:is 3080:) 3063:no 3014:) 2978:, 2974:A 2946:) 2887:) 2852:) 2741:) 2733:. 2699:) 2684:) 2588:) 2559:) 2535:) 2527:. 2510:) 2457:) 2432:) 2413:) 2390:) 2362:) 2273:) 2246:) 2231:— 2215:— 2199:— 2183:— 2167:— 2129:) 2080:) 2057:) 2053:• 2020:) 1998:) 1962:) 1940:) 1849:) 1834:) 1819:) 1673:) 1659:— 1645:) 1562:) 1544:) 1517:) 1480:) 1472:. 1432:) 1410:). 1268:) 1231:) 1215:— 1109:) 1089:, 1076:) 1018:) 992:— 977:— 963:— 893:) 876:) 806:) 696:) 679:is 598:— 381:, 233:). 103:, 70:/ 66:/ 62:: 4582:( 4566:( 4523:( 4507:( 4482:. 4386:. 4337:( 4310:( 4288:( 4265:( 4249:( 4213:( 4186:( 4170:( 4142:( 4104:( 4052:( 4010:) 4006:( 3984:( 3946:) 3942:( 3915:( 3872:) 3868:( 3859:– 3843:) 3839:( 3830:– 3791:( 3719:. 3678:( 3591:( 3556:( 3529:( 3497:; 3459:( 3450:. 3363:. 3333:. 3303:. 3233:) 3219:. 3188:. 3146:( 3103:( 3076:( 3010:( 2970:) 2966:( 2942:( 2897:. 2883:( 2863:" 2848:( 2837:. 2808:: 2762:. 2737:( 2695:( 2680:( 2584:( 2555:( 2531:( 2506:( 2453:( 2428:( 2409:( 2386:( 2358:( 2269:( 2242:( 2125:( 2076:( 2049:( 2016:( 1994:( 1958:( 1936:( 1928:. 1884:" 1845:( 1830:( 1815:( 1799:) 1795:( 1669:( 1641:( 1558:( 1540:( 1513:( 1476:( 1457:) 1453:( 1444:– 1428:( 1264:( 1253:) 1249:( 1227:( 1173:) 1169:( 1131:) 1127:( 1105:( 1072:( 1050:) 1046:( 1037:– 1014:( 1007:. 982:e 928:. 917:. 889:( 872:( 846:) 842:( 802:( 739:) 735:( 692:( 670:. 559:. 427:. 393:. 312:) 209:. 189:. 169:. 149:. 42::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index