2333:—I didn't bother !voting before because the supporting comments above seemed so patently absurd to me I figured this proposal was obviously dead. I would note that the two currently-redlinked accounts above each have only a handful of edits this year, and one seems to have come out of four months of inactivity just to make the !vote and do nothing else since.I'm surprised to notice just now that all of the academic journal articles I've seen mentioning this topic aren't in this Knowledge article and so far it's just popular press articles... but often ones that use the word "reckoning" in their headline, anyways, indicating its firm independent notability.It's clearly a notable topic in a country with a long, deep history of racial issues and trends which have come to a cusp on multiple fronts in 2020, not just some subordinate facet of protests related to police brutality and racially disparate "criminal justice" system outcomes. The drive-by derogatory comments about the article to accompany supporting !votes should not be taken as evidence of serious editorial consensus. This all seems to be repeating the pattern of
1046:. A raw vote count had 15 editors in favor of a merge (plus one more editor who !voted in favor after I wrote this statement), and 6 opposed, although there were some suspiciously low-activity editors on the merge side. Arguments in favor of the merge were that the social developments described in the racial reckoning article could be included in the article about unrest, and that this article exists as a CFORK. Arguments opposed to the merge argued that coverage in RS about social effects justifies an article separate from the article about unrest, and that the racial reckoning article's content would make the unrest article too long, or cause the social impacts to get crowded out by coverage of protests and riots. At the time of this close, the entire text of the racial reckoning article had already been copied to the unrest article, with the unrest article now weighing in at a large, but not over-large 37k characters of text, which would appear to belie the claim that these articles could not be cleanly merged. While it would be possible to split out this content with a
2285:(would anyone suggest they both happened in the same months by coincidence?) and this needs to be reflected in the content. I think the best way to do this is through a merger, though if there is a better way somebody could suggest it. As for what the sources say, I looked through many more and nearly every one connects the reckoning to "protests" or "civil unrest" or something in this vein (including 5 of 7 in the "Consumer behavior" section you mentioned). The academic articles collection below includes only two from this year (and this article is about this year specifically), and both connect the reckoning to Black Lives Matter right at the top. Regarding the title of the other article, perhaps it could be changed, but that would be a whole separate discussion. And my bad, I thought you were suggesting the summary style version, though I see now you prefaced it "even if ...". If you have more thoughts let me know. If not, I agree with
1956:, could hardly believe it survived, and was going to nominate it again once some time had passed. (In fact, 11 out of 18 participants there wanted to delete or merge.) But now would be an excellent opportunity to merge this into a much more well-rounded article. Yes, all these sociocultural changes and upheaval are a part of the overall unrest, sources treat them as all a part of the same overall subject, and artificially splitting these selected items off like this is POV and OR. This stuff can easily be covered there with
21:
1269:
side of the wider cultural reaction to the protests. Regrettably, recent polls have shown support for BLM collapsing, so I am not convinced there's any "reckoning" on the horizon outside some Jim Crow era statues being torn down. Finally, it's not
Knowledge's role to determine what is or isn't a "reckoning" on racial injustice. This article is highly inconsistent with encyclopedic tones and frankly breaking with precedent, because I haven't seen any article on a similar subject written in this manner.
833:
809:
743:
725:
1911:
1809:
scope. If there is a parent topic for the "racial reckoning", it is "Black Lives
Matters protests" (which is presently not split out from its own section) and not "racial unrest". I would be interested in what extensive coverage describes the "racial reckoning" (or even changes in public polling, consumer habits, cultural pressure on institutions/businesses) as a result or facet of "unrest". As for forking, this article (and source coverage) existed well before that one.
1187:, this article describes a social/cultural response borne out in reliable sources. It is distinct from protests in response to the killing of George Floyd. It is distinct from subsequent protests, demonstrations, and unrest. There are a litany of cited sources that discuss its distinctness and that discuss it as a "reckoning with racial injustice". If there are sources that show no distance between "injustice reckoning" and "unrest", I would be interested in seeing them.
240:
222:
697:
918:
843:
985:
639:
615:
1904:
376:
358:
1907:
649:
123:
565:
547:
172:
753:
154:
1525:, and how much of that article would this article be? I'm thinking it would be a major portion of it, which would be undue weight. The merger of this article would increase that article by 50%, which would make many reasonable editors say, "Hey, this section probably needs to be spun off". It's a waste of time to merge, then spin off. Let's just recognize this is a topic of its own.
308:
290:
2263:
changes, whether or not they use the word "reckoning" in particular, are described in sources as a distinct social phenomenon from the protests. E.g., look at the "Source dump" section below alone or to the sources discussed in the AfD. For the next point, the titling of the "unrest" article is aggressively non-neutral, given its implication of violence (see examples at
950:
94:
2361:"The 2020 United States racial unrest is an ongoing wave of civil unrest, comprising protests and riots, against systemic racism towards Black people in the United States, notably in the form of police violence." So I don't think by including the material from this article there we would be implying other issues are subordinate to policing issues.
428:
1089:(see also discussions there about changing that article's name). The intention of that article is to provide a broad, overarching summary of the wave of opposition to system racism and support for Black Lives Matter in 2020; this article seems to have a similar focus. I don't think the distance between "
1057:
Floyd protests, the extent to which the social response is distinct from the whole umbrella of race-related protests in 2020 has not been clearly established, as sources provided for the reckoning article identify the ongoing wave of protests as both a catalyst and consequence of ongoing social changes.
2388:
I disagree. If you look at the sentence I copied in, the protests are chiefly about police brutality but also about other issues. This is also reflected in the body of the article, for instance the section on removing
Confederate monuments. It is perfectly possible for the article to say the protests
2360:
Good idea to add more academic articles in addition to the journalistic sources included here. Regarding your main point, though, the protests are not just about police violence, even though that was the original trigger with the George Floyd protests. The first sentence of the unrest article states:
2480:
No, "prominent" pales in comparison to "phenomenon". It's in-text attributed to the newspaper of record. It's not contested that she is a public phenomenon by public demand. There should be no question of puffery. Feel free to offer a suitable replacement if you don't like that word, but I don't see
2494:
Do you have any other source that supports calling DiAngelo a "phenomenon"? The sources I've seen all mention her book topping best-selling lists, of course, but nothing in the way of "phenomenon". They simply call her a professor, author, diversity consultant, etc. All of which leads me to believe
2303:
One final note. I just realized the source dump you mentioned is separate from the academic source list, so I looked through some of those too. Every one I checked (didn't have time to look through all of them) connected the reckoning to the protests, usually right near the top. So I think a merger
2247:
is used in sources is overly important compared to whether they treat this as a separate phenomenon. In that vein regarding (2), having looked through the first several sources for the article, all of them mention the protests/unrest (some at length, though that varies significantly). We could look
1808:
I don't understand this at all. This presupposes that the coverage for "racial unrest" far outweighs that of a "racial reckoning" but this is not borne out in the sources. There are far more POV connotations in the title "racial unrest" than "racial reckoning" but that's a matter for that article's
2262:
There are dozens of sources in this article, so yes, would need to look beyond simply whatever the first several present. The use of "reckoning" in the source itself should be instructive but has never been the point of this article. Entire sections, such as those on consumer behavior and cultural
2204:
No one has actually addressed the substance of the opposition. (1) The social reckoning has better sourcing than the "unrest," which is, at best, an overview article of other discrete events. (2) That the merger would make the social reckoning an "reaction/effect" of the "unrest," when the sources
1582:
pointed me to the original RfC (at the other article's talk page). While the RfC tag has been removed (Why? And why isn't there one here now?), the other discussion clearly leads people to this one, and FRS doesn't do anything to sort people by age of account. So, people will show up here. That
1268:
This entire article could be in a section on the racial unrest. I do not agree with the reasoning that this is some type of distinct social phenomenon that wouldn't fit in the unrest article. The sources linked serve only to reinforce the author's contentions. Also, this article only describes one
1056:
template, it appears that this is not necessary at this time, and doing so would actually further skew the unrest article to emphasize the protests and riots over the social impacts. While editors opposed to merge successfully made the case that the social response goes above and beyond the George
2509:
Why does it need a second source if it's in-line attributed? This is the main profile on her, covering how she got where she is and is sought as a speaker by a litany of major institutions (who are all competing to provide anti-racist training). The only other sources that go into her exorbitant
2284:
Thanks for your thoughts. I do see your points and so I will be changing my !vote to "Lean towards support" in a second. In general I agree that the reckoning is a different phenomenon from the protests, but the reckoning was clearly caused by the attention to the issue generated by the protests
1539:
No, I do not recognize this as a topic of its own. As to your question, much of this article's lead, Public opinion, and Public debate sections would be made redundant. I estimate the unique content discussing the societal impact would amount to ~20% of the combined article's length, which seems
2146:
It is redundant to have separate articles on the topic. Both articles are discussing the same thing and one can fit within the other for ease of access for future readers. I prefer merging the Racial reckoning article into the larger Unrest article. Also, this article reads more like a college
1822:
I just did a Google News search, and "2020 racial unrest" leads over "2020 racial reckoning" by nearly a 3:1 ratio. But it's immaterial. This RfC is about whether we should have two articles on essentially the same topic. An article renaming matter (e.g. to "2020 United States race-related
1900:'s concern that " merger would likely eliminate any coverage on social effects of the protest movement, in favor of covering only the riots and violence which attract the headlines" which may make it unnecessarily larger without improvement. I also do not see how the title is POV when
1286:
A merger would likely eliminate any coverage on social effects of the protest movement, in favor of covering only the riots and violence which attract the headlines. There are reliable sources covering such social aspects, even when not generally speaking of a reckoning.
2615:
I agree, this is still being regulary referenced as a distinctive 2020 social shift, and "unrest" doesn't really cover it. There are hundreds of
Knowledge articles on institutional name changes, etc, that would most usefully link directly to an article specific to the
1487:, The unrest article is way too long already. If we insert this into it, very soon someone will say, 'hey, this article is too long. What can we spin off?' and someone will answer, 'I think we can spin off the fallout.' Which means recreating this article.
2389:
started over police brutality but later induced a reckoning over other issues too, so I don't think the objection holds any weight. I actually tend towards thinking we do readers a disservice by not making that clear and having two disconnected articles.
1469:
If the "reckoning" is fallout from the unrest, doesn't that mean they are not in fact completely separate topics? If the "reckoning" or societal impact is an extension or result of the unrest, then they should be included together in the same article.
2337:, wherein as the closer noted the supporting !voters also did not engage with the sources or qualitative opposing arguments.I mean, a re-appraisal of stuff like the terms "master bedroom" or "master/slave" as computer hard drive technical terms? Or
2248:
at that point further if you like. Regarding (3), I don't object to having a shorter summary in that article (to keep the length shorter) and this as the full article, but if that is what we are doing we should more clearly indicate this as such.
2205:
describe it as an independent phenomenon from protests/"unrest". (3) That even were it to be shoehorned into the "unrest" article, which doesn't make sense for the aforementioned reasons, it would still have enough coverage by length to warrant a
1926:
which resulted in keep. The closure stated that "The question is whether this is original research by synthesis" which I think can and has been improved, so I believe that for a merge proposal it would have been better to wait a bit more.
2334:
2214:
1953:
1923:
1184:
104:
2341:, even though it hasn't been legal for more than seventy years? That stuff has nothing to do with police brutality, except the commonality of racism, which unfortunately is hardly a confined or siloed thing in the United States. --
2267:) and based on the sourcing in this article, it would be incorrect to portray changes in consumer behavior and other social/economic changes as a "reaction" to either "unrest" or the protests. No one has proposed the
2547:
Americans were living through history in 2020 as the country was forced to reconcile the past and the present. ... No matter where you turned, you couldnt ignore reality. America was the epicenter of a racial
1714:
2nd note to closer: Both this discussion and the aborted one at the other article's talk page will need to be assessed together, as it's unlikely that everyone who commented in one will comment in the other.
2510:
speaker fees are right-wing rags. The point isn't to cover her speaking fees or best-seller here, but to briefly note how the reckoning has propelled her career. Rise to prominence is mild in comparison.
2766:
1901:
1896:. Reliable sources are discussing a different topic, i.e. the coverage on social effects of the protest movement rather than only the riots and violence which attract the headlines. I do share
1228:
Okay, I have now done this. However, 'racial reckoning' is more common. I suggest the page be renamed according to the more common sociological term: 'United States racial reckoning'.
1656:
Not going to dig thru page history for it; my own talk page has the FRS notice about the RfC; it's how I found the discussion (it's the only RfC-style discussion on that talk page).
2771:
873:
2230:
You are entitled to your opinion, but as is clear both above and at the AfD, most other
Wikipedians aren't buying it, and have explained repeatedly the problems with this article.
2776:
2375:
Merging social reckoning content to the
Reactions section of the "unrest" article would literally subordinate the content beneath an article entirely about policing issues, yes.
1991:
that the racial reckoning article seems like it was derived from a "Reactions" section, and now it looks like the racial unrest article is the perfect place to put it as such.
511:
484:
474:
65:
2781:
459:
2726:
2666:
1243:
1001:
890:
2731:
2646:
1739:, and in the direction proposed. The supposed "reckoning" is a result (or could become a result) of the unrest, so is naturally a subtopic. And "reckoning" is far too
489:
479:
2651:
706:
625:
1952:
narrative, and justifying itself in the AfD by pointing to various media articles that happened to converge on the term "reckoning". I saw this a while back after
41:
2756:
2736:
2676:
2656:
1783:
at the other talk page, to this one. (Technically, I think merge discussion belong as the merge-to target's talk page, but this is the one listed at WP:PM, and "
2761:
2691:
2661:
1915:
1875:. As several others have already commented, this article's title is much more POV-charged than the target's. I think this either needs to be renamed or merged.
524:
256:
2706:
2681:
2786:
2696:
1502:
927:
880:
819:
188:
1775:
have been raised. The only cure for that is "advertising" this discussion to a broader set of actual WP editors. I have also checked that it is listed at
2711:
1097:, implying more of a focus on the protests and riots, is sufficient to justify not having one main overarching article that brings everything together. —
469:
2536:
2339:
renewed efforts to actually count and map the many real estate deeds that still contain language forbidding Jews or non-whites from owning the property
2751:
2716:
2671:
324:
2721:
2686:
885:
520:
392:
247:
227:
2701:
581:
1376:
There has been no new discussion in nearly two weeks — should the discussion be closed and we proceed with the merger? The current !votes show 6
391:, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1432:, yes, and you said basically '6-to-3, proceed with the merger?' which to me indicated you thought that was the important thing here. It's not.
2741:
179:
159:
2083:
There do not need to be two articles, one describing the events and one describing social reaction. They should be part of the same article.
2013:
2746:
1325:
on the other article, the multitude of articles focusing on slightly different aspects of these events is overly burdensome and confusing.
775:
315:
295:
1919:
856:
814:
671:
432:
383:
363:
1779:, and is properly tagged with merge templates (someone else already did take care of that). I have also closed and soft-redirected the
1359:
This is not an encyclopedic article, nor a retelling of historical on-going events, this is poorly written student-thesis. It’s a joke.
2213:
and do not even attempt to address the distinctions in sourcing, which have been amply discussed both elsewhere on this talk page and
1564:
Note to closer: there are a surprising number of newish accounts !voting support for this merger. I'm not sure how to interpret this.
868:
572:
552:
1321:
This does not warrant a standalone article, and is much better suited for a section on the racial unrest article. Per the comment by
2592:
1838:
1798:
1762:
1726:
1667:
1598:
1086:
966:
1987:- I could've sworn I already voted for this, but I suppose not. Anyway, the two topics seem highly correlated with one another.
1274:
766:
730:
2463:
The current phrasing of "rose to prominence" conveys that quite satisfactorily, doesn't it? The previous version struck me as
1771:
PS: I have put an RfC tag back on this. The original thread had one, and it should be an RfC, especially since concerns about
662:
620:
1080:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
864:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
2430:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1855:. This article reads more as someone's personal thesis, and I think even the name of this article sounds like it violates
2343:
134:
2449:? That the reckoning has propelled DiAngelo's career, a fact affirmed by the NYT, is directly relevant to the article.
1501:
Why do you say the destination article is way too long already? The article's prose currently has 20,436 characters
1270:
100:
1013:
2271:
version you suggested because if they did, they could just merge the content without affecting this article.
2171:- So what's the status on the merge? It's been a week since the last vote. Are we proceeding with it or not?
2268:
2206:
2176:
2106:. And if the merger doesn't go ahead, the two articles should cross-reference each other much more clearly.
2088:
2042:
1996:
122:
51:
1772:
1364:
1171:
446:
2500:
2471:
2210:
2084:
1932:
1835:
1795:
1759:
1744:
1723:
1664:
1595:
1545:
1513:
1475:
1420:
1389:
1330:
1233:
1212:
1148:
1122:
140:
20:
1587:
was involved, though. On US politics topics, that's always a strong possibility, due to social media.
1360:
2338:
1207:
In that case, you need a better LEDE and a section introducing the concept. Let me write one for you.
2412:
From all the arguments above. No need to have this kind os content split for this subject. Regards,
2152:
2147:
student's thesis rather than a proper encyclopedia article of the subject, which itself is an issue.
1957:
1347:
848:
969:
on 20 October 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see
93:
2629:
2583:
2518:
2504:
2489:
2475:
2457:
2420:
2398:
2394:
2383:
2370:
2366:
2355:
2313:
2309:
2298:
2294:
2279:
2257:
2253:
2238:
2225:
2197:
2180:
2156:
2136:
2132:
2115:
2111:
2092:
2075:
2046:
2024:
2000:
1978:
1936:
1884:
1867:
1843:
1817:
1803:
1767:
1731:
1697:
1693:
1672:
1651:
1634:
1620:
1603:
1573:
1549:
1534:
1517:
1496:
1479:
1464:
1455:
this is a completely separate topic. This is not about unrest. It's about fallout from the unrest.
1441:
1424:
1410:
1393:
1368:
1351:
1334:
1313:
1296:
1278:
1254:
1237:
1216:
1195:
1175:
1152:
1126:
1106:
1102:
1068:
917:
2554:
2061:
774:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
670:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
580:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
323:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
255:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
187:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2172:
2038:
2007:
1992:
1880:
1780:
1647:
1630:
1616:
1569:
1530:
1505:
1492:
1460:
1437:
1406:
1292:
1019:
252:
31:
1508:. Indeed, even after the merger (+11,000 characters), it would still be comfortably under 40kB.
832:
808:
1017:
2464:
2068:
1945:
1748:
1401:, it's not a vote. That's why we use !vote. The numbers aren't as important as the arguments.
1167:
962:
742:
724:
79:
35:
2625:
2617:
2496:
2467:
2441:
1928:
1830:
1790:
1754:
1718:
1678:
1659:
1639:
1608:
1590:
1541:
1522:
1509:
1484:
1471:
1429:
1416:
1398:
1385:
1326:
1229:
1208:
1144:
1118:
1015:
984:
184:
696:
2286:
2232:
2191:
2186:
2148:
2103:
1972:
1962:
1949:
1682:
1343:
654:
500:
239:
221:
2577:
2512:
2483:
2451:
2390:
2377:
2362:
2305:
2290:
2273:
2249:
2219:
2128:
2107:
1856:
1811:
1686:
1584:
1309:
1248:
1222:
1201:
1189:
1137:
1098:
758:
320:
46:
27:
648:
638:
614:
2640:
2413:
1897:
1876:
1784:
1740:
1643:
1626:
1612:
1611:, and no one has identified a specific requester anywhere, which is why I'm not sure
1579:
1565:
1526:
1488:
1456:
1433:
1402:
1288:
1061:
1050:
861:
1787:", so this should be good enough to get the discussion centralized and assessable.)
1859:. I see no reason why this can't be part of the broader "racial unrest" article. —
1824:
1776:
577:
388:
375:
357:
57:
2621:
2304:
is appropriate, and if not, significant cross-referencing between the articles.
2018:
1861:
1322:
838:
752:
748:
644:
564:
546:
1093:", referring more to public awareness and changes, as far as I can tell, and
2124:
1893:
1305:
1042:
771:
466:
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
860:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
171:
153:
460:
Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
667:
387:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to
1743:-pushing for an encyclopedia article's title anyway. This is clearly a
427:
307:
289:
2540:
2264:
1504:, approximately 20kB, which is well under the 40kB rule of thumb per
1922:
is perfectly fine. I just noticed that in July there already was an
2535:
This topic continues to be referenced and covered as distinct from
1578:
Worth looking into, but I have to note that I arrived here because
494:
2060:- Can be telescoped into the broader racial unrest article. --
2559:
1020:
978:
944:
116:
88:
15:
2012:
Just FYI, the merge proposal moved. Your original support is
1948:
tying together various race-related events this year into a
916:
695:
2127:
raises some important points (see our discussion below).
1244:
Talk:2020 United States racial reckoning/Archive 1#Title
2446:
1988:
970:
957:
73:
2767:
Redirect-Class United States articles of NA-importance
2539:(which, additionally, I think time has borne out as
2495:
the article text is accurate and appropriate as is.
2481:
the basis for the revert based on how it's sourced.
2209:
split. Altogether the support bullets above read as
770:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
666:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
576:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
512:
Knowledge:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests
485:
Category:Ethnic groups articles needing reassessment
475:
Category:Ethnic groups articles needing merge action
319:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
251:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
183:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1242:So as not to get off-topic, we can discuss this in
490:Category:Ethnic groups articles needing attention
480:Category:Ethnic groups articles needing infoboxes
1827:matter and has no effect on the merge question.
1625:Wait, there was an RfC tag that's been removed?
66:Talk:United States racial unrest (2020–present)
2243:Regarding (1), I don't think whether the word
2772:Redirect-Class United States History articles
2545:
1916:2020 United States racial injustice reckoning
456:of articles within the scope of this project.
8:
2777:NA-importance United States History articles
1642:, can you point me at that? Not finding it.
2189:. I believe this needs a definite closure.
2782:WikiProject United States History articles
803:
719:
609:
541:
470:Category:Unassessed Ethnic groups articles
416:
352:
284:
216:
148:
42:United States racial unrest (2020–present)
2727:Redirect-Class American politics articles
2667:NA-importance Black Lives Matter articles
133:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
2732:NA-importance American politics articles
2647:Redirect-Class African diaspora articles
265:Knowledge:WikiProject Black Lives Matter
2652:NA-importance African diaspora articles
805:
721:
611:
543:
354:
286:
268:Template:WikiProject Black Lives Matter
218:
150:
1914:itself. I could have maybe agreed for
1041:merge has already been carried out by
197:Knowledge:WikiProject African diaspora
2757:Redirect-Class United States articles
2737:American politics task force articles
2677:NA-importance Discrimination articles
2657:WikiProject African diaspora articles
1342:your sources are biaised to the core.
854:This redirect is within the scope of
764:This redirect is within the scope of
660:This redirect is within the scope of
570:This redirect is within the scope of
420:WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:
381:This redirect is within the scope of
313:This redirect is within the scope of
245:This redirect is within the scope of
200:Template:WikiProject African diaspora
177:This redirect is within the scope of
120:
7:
2762:NA-importance United States articles
2692:NA-importance Ethnic groups articles
2662:NA-Class Black Lives Matter articles
2555:"The year America confronted racism"
1076:The following discussion is closed.
333:Knowledge:WikiProject Discrimination
45:Because this page is not frequently
2707:NA-importance Human rights articles
2682:WikiProject Discrimination articles
2289:that this should move to WP:ANRFC.
1920:2020 United States racial reckoning
1085:This article should be merged into
958:2020 United States racial reckoning
901:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
401:Knowledge:WikiProject Ethnic groups
336:Template:WikiProject Discrimination
78:is maintained in order to preserve
2787:WikiProject United States articles
2697:WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
2123:– I still think this was best but
904:Template:WikiProject United States
590:Knowledge:WikiProject Human rights
404:Template:WikiProject Ethnic groups
49:, present and future discussions,
14:
2712:WikiProject Human rights articles
593:Template:WikiProject Human rights
2752:NA-importance sociology articles
2717:Redirect-Class politics articles
2672:NA-Class Discrimination articles
2553:Chavez, Nicole (December 2020).
2426:The discussion above is closed.
1087:2020 United States racial unrest
983:
967:2020 United States racial unrest
948:
841:
831:
807:
751:
741:
723:
647:
637:
613:
563:
545:
426:
374:
356:
306:
288:
238:
220:
170:
152:
121:
92:
19:
2722:NA-importance politics articles
2687:NA-Class Ethnic groups articles
1968:08:19, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
784:Knowledge:WikiProject Sociology
99:This article was nominated for
2702:NA-Class Human rights articles
2591:Payne, Daniel (May 25, 2021).
2519:06:51, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
2505:06:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
2490:06:02, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
2476:05:54, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
2458:05:41, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
2093:03:09, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
2076:18:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
2047:03:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
2025:07:56, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
2001:07:43, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
1937:03:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
1885:17:04, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
1868:08:08, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
1818:01:02, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
1804:19:49, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1785:Knowledge is not a bureaucracy
1768:19:14, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1732:19:49, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1698:07:49, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
1673:19:49, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1652:19:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1635:19:20, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1621:19:19, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1604:19:17, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1574:18:52, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1550:19:20, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1535:19:11, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1518:19:00, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1497:18:54, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1480:18:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1465:18:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1442:18:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1425:18:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1411:18:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1394:15:47, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1369:07:53, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
1352:07:53, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
925:This redirect is supported by
787:Template:WikiProject Sociology
704:This redirect is supported by
680:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
248:WikiProject Black Lives Matter
139:It is of interest to multiple
103:on 2 July 2020. The result of
1:
2742:WikiProject Politics articles
2630:22:27, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
1828:
1823:protests", or whatever) is a
1788:
1752:
1716:
1657:
1588:
1335:05:42, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
1314:00:24, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
1297:08:37, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
1279:06:58, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
778:and see a list of open tasks.
683:Template:WikiProject Politics
674:and see a list of open tasks.
584:and see a list of open tasks.
395:and see a list of open tasks.
327:and see a list of open tasks.
259:and see a list of open tasks.
191:and see a list of open tasks.
2447:this in-line attributed fact
2445:, what is your objection to
2421:19:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
2399:14:24, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
2384:23:34, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
2371:16:09, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
2356:21:35, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
2314:14:36, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
2299:14:13, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
2280:23:34, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
2258:16:01, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
2239:20:19, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
2226:17:02, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
2198:16:20, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
2181:06:49, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
2137:14:17, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
1979:16:20, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
1844:04:35, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
1162:, as I have never heard of "
1143:'s explanation makes sense.
1069:20:16, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
707:American politics task force
180:WikiProject African diaspora
2747:NA-Class sociology articles
2157:16:25, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
2116:17:48, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
1304:title is non-encyclopedic.
1255:20:17, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
1238:18:37, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
1217:18:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
1196:17:44, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
1176:12:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
1153:20:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
1127:10:45, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
1107:10:12, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
271:Black Lives Matter articles
2803:
2593:"White America: Awakened?"
316:WikiProject Discrimination
2215:at length in the July AfD
1037:Rough consensus for merge
924:
857:WikiProject United States
826:
736:
703:
632:
558:
433:WikiProject Ethnic groups
415:
384:WikiProject Ethnic groups
369:
301:
233:
203:African diaspora articles
165:
147:
38:and now targets the page:
2428:Please do not modify it.
1078:Please do not modify it.
928:WikiProject U.S. history
862:United States of America
573:WikiProject Human rights
74:Merged page edit history
2584:05:58, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
339:Discrimination articles
2574:
2058:Strongly support merge
1540:perfectly reasonable.
1415:I know; I said !vote.
921:
907:United States articles
700:
407:Ethnic groups articles
1271:Bigeyedbeansfromvenus
920:
767:WikiProject Sociology
699:
596:Human rights articles
61:should take place at:
2537:2020 "racial unrest"
2185:About to list it at
2121:Lean toward support.
1970:added parenthetical
1944:. This article is a
955:The contents of the
849:United States portal
663:WikiProject Politics
2541:an inadequate title
1908:by reliable sources
1164:injustice reckoning
1091:injustice reckoning
1039:, and a successful
875:Articles Requested!
525:discuss these tasks
431:Here are some open
2531:Continued coverage
2037:Oh, okay. Thanks.
1989:I mentioned before
1685:should be used. --
1079:
922:
790:sociology articles
701:
508:Start an article:
262:Black Lives Matter
253:Black Lives Matter
228:Black Lives Matter
135:content assessment
60:
54:
2419:
2163:Arbitrary break 1
1981:
1583:doesn't mean now
1077:
1026:
1025:
1007:
1006:
977:
976:
943:
942:
939:
938:
935:
934:
802:
801:
798:
797:
718:
717:
714:
713:
686:politics articles
608:
607:
604:
603:
540:
539:
536:
535:
532:
531:
351:
350:
347:
346:
283:
282:
279:
278:
215:
214:
211:
210:
115:
114:
87:
86:
56:
50:
2794:
2618:racial reckoning
2607:
2605:
2603:
2582:
2580:
2572:
2571:
2569:
2567:
2517:
2515:
2488:
2486:
2456:
2454:
2444:
2418:
2416:
2382:
2380:
2354:
2351:
2347:
2278:
2276:
2237:
2224:
2222:
2196:
2081:Agree with merge
2011:
1977:
1969:
1967:
1912:racial reckoning
1842:
1816:
1814:
1802:
1766:
1730:
1689:
1671:
1602:
1253:
1251:
1227:
1225:
1206:
1204:
1194:
1192:
1142:
1140:
1055:
1049:
1021:
998:
997:
987:
979:
960:
952:
951:
945:
909:
908:
905:
902:
899:
851:
846:
845:
844:
835:
828:
827:
822:
811:
804:
792:
791:
788:
785:
782:
761:
756:
755:
745:
738:
737:
727:
720:
688:
687:
684:
681:
678:
657:
652:
651:
641:
634:
633:
628:
617:
610:
598:
597:
594:
591:
588:
567:
560:
559:
549:
542:
454:on the talk page
451:
445:
430:
417:
409:
408:
405:
402:
399:
378:
371:
370:
360:
353:
341:
340:
337:
334:
331:
310:
303:
302:
292:
285:
273:
272:
269:
266:
263:
242:
235:
234:
224:
217:
205:
204:
201:
198:
195:
194:African diaspora
185:African diaspora
174:
167:
166:
160:African diaspora
156:
149:
126:
125:
117:
96:
89:
76:
23:
16:
2802:
2801:
2797:
2796:
2795:
2793:
2792:
2791:
2637:
2636:
2610:
2601:
2599:
2590:
2578:
2576:
2565:
2563:
2552:
2550:
2533:
2513:
2511:
2484:
2482:
2452:
2450:
2439:
2437:
2432:
2431:
2414:
2378:
2376:
2349:
2345:
2342:
2274:
2272:
2231:
2220:
2218:
2190:
2165:
2005:
1971:
1961:
1812:
1810:
1773:WP:MEATPUPPETRY
1747:and arguably a
1687:
1249:
1247:
1223:
1221:
1202:
1200:
1190:
1188:
1183:. As discussed
1138:
1136:
1082:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1060:
1053:
1047:
1031:
1029:Merger proposal
1022:
1016:
992:
956:
949:
906:
903:
900:
897:
896:
895:
881:Become a Member
847:
842:
840:
817:
789:
786:
783:
780:
779:
757:
750:
685:
682:
679:
676:
675:
655:Politics portal
653:
646:
623:
595:
592:
589:
586:
585:
501:Peruvian people
449:
443:
406:
403:
400:
397:
396:
338:
335:
332:
329:
328:
270:
267:
264:
261:
260:
202:
199:
196:
193:
192:
72:
58:requested moves
12:
11:
5:
2800:
2798:
2790:
2789:
2784:
2779:
2774:
2769:
2764:
2759:
2754:
2749:
2744:
2739:
2734:
2729:
2724:
2719:
2714:
2709:
2704:
2699:
2694:
2689:
2684:
2679:
2674:
2669:
2664:
2659:
2654:
2649:
2639:
2638:
2635:
2634:
2633:
2632:
2609:
2608:
2587:
2549:
2532:
2529:
2528:
2527:
2526:
2525:
2524:
2523:
2522:
2521:
2436:
2433:
2425:
2424:
2423:
2407:
2406:
2405:
2404:
2403:
2402:
2401:
2327:
2326:
2325:
2324:
2323:
2322:
2321:
2320:
2319:
2318:
2317:
2316:
2211:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
2202:
2201:
2200:
2164:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2141:
2140:
2139:
2095:
2078:
2054:
2053:
2052:
2051:
2050:
2049:
2030:
2029:
2028:
2027:
1982:
1950:WP:SYNTHesized
1939:
1887:
1870:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1846:
1770:
1745:WP:CONTENTFORK
1734:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1677:Maybe because
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1371:
1354:
1337:
1316:
1299:
1281:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1178:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1083:
1074:
1058:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1030:
1027:
1024:
1023:
1018:
1014:
1012:
1009:
1008:
1005:
1004:
994:
993:
988:
982:
975:
974:
953:
941:
940:
937:
936:
933:
932:
923:
913:
912:
910:
894:
893:
888:
883:
878:
871:
869:Template Usage
865:
853:
852:
836:
824:
823:
812:
800:
799:
796:
795:
793:
776:the discussion
763:
762:
759:Society portal
746:
734:
733:
728:
716:
715:
712:
711:
702:
692:
691:
689:
672:the discussion
659:
658:
642:
630:
629:
618:
606:
605:
602:
601:
599:
582:the discussion
568:
556:
555:
550:
538:
537:
534:
533:
530:
529:
521:edit this list
517:
516:
515:
514:
506:
505:
504:
497:
492:
487:
482:
477:
472:
464:
463:
462:
457:
422:
421:
413:
412:
410:
393:the discussion
379:
367:
366:
361:
349:
348:
345:
344:
342:
330:Discrimination
325:the discussion
321:Discrimination
311:
299:
298:
296:Discrimination
293:
281:
280:
277:
276:
274:
257:the discussion
243:
231:
230:
225:
213:
212:
209:
208:
206:
189:the discussion
175:
163:
162:
157:
145:
144:
138:
127:
113:
112:
105:the discussion
97:
85:
84:
69:
62:
44:
39:
34:that has been
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2799:
2788:
2785:
2783:
2780:
2778:
2775:
2773:
2770:
2768:
2765:
2763:
2760:
2758:
2755:
2753:
2750:
2748:
2745:
2743:
2740:
2738:
2735:
2733:
2730:
2728:
2725:
2723:
2720:
2718:
2715:
2713:
2710:
2708:
2705:
2703:
2700:
2698:
2695:
2693:
2690:
2688:
2685:
2683:
2680:
2678:
2675:
2673:
2670:
2668:
2665:
2663:
2660:
2658:
2655:
2653:
2650:
2648:
2645:
2644:
2642:
2631:
2627:
2623:
2619:
2614:
2613:
2612:
2611:
2598:
2594:
2589:
2588:
2586:
2585:
2581:
2573:
2562:
2561:
2556:
2544:
2542:
2538:
2530:
2520:
2516:
2508:
2507:
2506:
2502:
2498:
2493:
2492:
2491:
2487:
2479:
2478:
2477:
2473:
2469:
2466:
2462:
2461:
2460:
2459:
2455:
2448:
2443:
2434:
2429:
2422:
2417:
2411:
2408:
2400:
2396:
2392:
2387:
2386:
2385:
2381:
2374:
2373:
2372:
2368:
2364:
2359:
2358:
2357:
2353:
2340:
2336:
2332:
2329:
2328:
2315:
2311:
2307:
2302:
2301:
2300:
2296:
2292:
2288:
2283:
2282:
2281:
2277:
2270:
2269:summary style
2266:
2261:
2260:
2259:
2255:
2251:
2246:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2236:
2235:
2229:
2228:
2227:
2223:
2216:
2212:
2208:
2207:summary style
2203:
2199:
2195:
2194:
2188:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2178:
2174:
2173:Love of Corey
2170:
2167:
2166:
2162:
2158:
2154:
2150:
2145:
2144:Support merge
2142:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2126:
2122:
2119:
2118:
2117:
2113:
2109:
2105:
2101:
2100:
2096:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2085:Cynistrategus
2082:
2079:
2077:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2065:
2064:
2059:
2056:
2055:
2048:
2044:
2040:
2039:Love of Corey
2036:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2026:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2015:
2009:
2008:Love of Corey
2004:
2003:
2002:
1998:
1994:
1993:Love of Corey
1990:
1986:
1985:Support merge
1983:
1980:
1976:
1975:
1966:
1965:
1959:
1958:WP:Due weight
1955:
1951:
1947:
1943:
1940:
1938:
1934:
1930:
1925:
1921:
1917:
1913:
1909:
1906:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1888:
1886:
1882:
1878:
1874:
1871:
1869:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1858:
1854:
1851:
1845:
1840:
1837:
1834:
1833:
1826:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1815:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1800:
1797:
1794:
1793:
1786:
1782:
1778:
1774:
1769:
1764:
1761:
1758:
1757:
1750:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1735:
1733:
1728:
1725:
1722:
1721:
1713:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1669:
1666:
1663:
1662:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1649:
1645:
1641:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1600:
1597:
1594:
1593:
1586:
1581:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1563:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1503:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1451:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1372:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1355:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1338:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1317:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1300:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1267:
1264:
1256:
1252:
1245:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1226:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1205:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1193:
1186:
1182:
1179:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1141:
1134:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1115:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1081:
1070:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1052:
1045:
1044:
1038:
1028:
1011:
1010:
1003:
1000:
999:
996:
995:
991:
986:
981:
980:
972:
968:
964:
959:
954:
947:
946:
930:
929:
919:
915:
914:
911:
898:United States
892:
889:
887:
884:
882:
879:
877:
876:
872:
870:
867:
866:
863:
859:
858:
850:
839:
837:
834:
830:
829:
825:
821:
816:
815:United States
813:
810:
806:
794:
777:
773:
769:
768:
760:
754:
749:
747:
744:
740:
739:
735:
732:
729:
726:
722:
709:
708:
698:
694:
693:
690:
673:
669:
665:
664:
656:
650:
645:
643:
640:
636:
635:
631:
627:
622:
619:
616:
612:
600:
583:
579:
575:
574:
569:
566:
562:
561:
557:
554:
551:
548:
544:
528:
526:
522:
519:Feel free to
513:
510:
509:
507:
503:
502:
498:
496:
493:
491:
488:
486:
483:
481:
478:
476:
473:
471:
468:
467:
465:
461:
458:
455:
448:
447:Ethnic groups
441:
440:
438:
437:
436:
434:
429:
424:
423:
419:
418:
414:
411:
398:Ethnic groups
394:
390:
389:ethnic groups
386:
385:
380:
377:
373:
372:
368:
365:
364:Ethnic groups
362:
359:
355:
343:
326:
322:
318:
317:
312:
309:
305:
304:
300:
297:
294:
291:
287:
275:
258:
254:
250:
249:
244:
241:
237:
236:
232:
229:
226:
223:
219:
207:
190:
186:
182:
181:
176:
173:
169:
168:
164:
161:
158:
155:
151:
146:
142:
136:
132:
128:
124:
119:
118:
110:
106:
102:
98:
95:
91:
90:
83:
81:
77:
75:
68:
67:
59:
53:
52:edit requests
48:
43:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
2600:. Retrieved
2596:
2575:
2564:. Retrieved
2558:
2546:
2534:
2438:
2427:
2409:
2330:
2244:
2233:
2192:
2168:
2143:
2120:
2098:
2097:
2080:
2069:
2067:
2062:
2057:
2019:
2017:
1984:
1973:
1963:
1941:
1910:, including
1889:
1872:
1862:
1860:
1853:Strong agree
1852:
1831:
1791:
1755:
1736:
1719:
1660:
1591:
1452:
1384:the merger.
1381:
1377:
1373:
1361:Kaisersauce1
1357:Strong Agree
1356:
1339:
1319:Strong agree
1318:
1301:
1283:
1266:Strong agree
1265:
1180:
1168:Slatersteven
1163:
1160:Strong agree
1159:
1132:
1131:Changing to
1114:Strong agree
1113:
1112:
1094:
1090:
1084:
1075:
1063:
1062:
1040:
1036:
989:
926:
886:Project Talk
874:
855:
765:
705:
661:
587:Human rights
578:Human rights
571:
553:Human rights
518:
499:
453:
439:Meta-tasks:
425:
382:
314:
246:
178:
141:WikiProjects
130:
108:
80:attributions
71:
70:
64:
26:This is the
2497:Stonkaments
2468:Stonkaments
2442:Stonkaments
2350:andersnatch
1929:Davide King
1832:SMcCandlish
1792:SMcCandlish
1781:WP:TALKFORK
1756:SMcCandlish
1720:SMcCandlish
1661:SMcCandlish
1640:SMcCandlish
1609:SMcCandlish
1592:SMcCandlish
1542:Stonkaments
1523:Stonkaments
1510:Stonkaments
1506:WP:SIZERULE
1485:Stonkaments
1472:Stonkaments
1430:Stonkaments
1417:Stonkaments
1399:Stonkaments
1386:Stonkaments
1327:Stonkaments
1230:Johncdraper
1209:Johncdraper
1145:Johncdraper
1119:Johncdraper
971:its history
2641:Categories
2548:reckoning.
2465:WP:PUFFERY
2287:Crossroads
2234:Crossroads
2193:Crossroads
2149:RopeTricks
2104:Crossroads
1974:Crossroads
1964:Crossroads
1946:WP:POVFORK
1749:WP:POVFORK
1681:says that
1344:Baratiiman
961:page were
442:Place the
2391:Gazelle55
2363:Gazelle55
2346:truthious
2306:Gazelle55
2291:Gazelle55
2250:Gazelle55
2245:reckoning
2129:Gazelle55
2108:Gazelle55
2102:– As per
1679:WP:RFCNOT
1644:—valereee
1627:—valereee
1613:—valereee
1566:—valereee
1527:—valereee
1489:—valereee
1457:—valereee
1434:—valereee
1403:—valereee
1099:Kilopylae
1002:Archive 1
781:Sociology
772:sociology
731:Sociology
452:template
28:talk page
2602:June 11,
2597:Politico
2435:DiAngelo
2415:GenQuest
2187:WP:ANRFC
2099:Support.
1898:Dimadick
1877:Bensci54
1683:WP:MERGE
1289:Dimadick
1064:Rosguill
1059:signed,
990:Archives
677:Politics
668:politics
626:American
621:Politics
131:redirect
101:deletion
32:redirect
2410:Support
2335:the AfD
2169:Comment
2063:Veggies
1954:its AfD
1942:Support
1857:WP:NPOV
1737:Support
1585:WP:MEAT
1374:Comment
1246:above.
820:History
435:tasks:
47:watched
2622:Pharos
2566:May 2,
2331:Oppose
2265:unrest
2020:Czello
1890:Oppose
1863:Czello
1741:WP:POV
1690:rose64
1580:WP:FRS
1453:Oppose
1382:Oppose
1380:and 3
1323:FDW777
1284:Oppose
1181:Oppose
1133:Oppose
1095:unrest
963:merged
891:Alerts
137:scale.
36:merged
1902:it is
1873:Agree
1825:WP:RM
1777:WP:PM
1378:Agree
1340:Agree
1302:Agree
965:into
129:This
30:of a
2626:talk
2604:2021
2579:czar
2568:2021
2514:czar
2501:talk
2485:czar
2472:talk
2453:czar
2395:talk
2379:czar
2367:talk
2310:talk
2295:talk
2275:czar
2254:talk
2221:czar
2177:talk
2153:talk
2133:talk
2125:Czar
2112:talk
2089:talk
2070:talk
2043:talk
2016:. —
2014:here
1997:talk
1933:talk
1918:but
1905:used
1894:Czar
1892:per
1881:talk
1813:czar
1694:talk
1692:🌹 (
1648:talk
1631:talk
1617:talk
1570:talk
1546:talk
1531:talk
1514:talk
1493:talk
1476:talk
1461:talk
1438:talk
1421:talk
1407:talk
1390:talk
1365:talk
1348:talk
1331:talk
1310:talk
1306:Juno
1293:talk
1275:talk
1250:czar
1234:talk
1224:czar
1213:talk
1203:czar
1191:czar
1185:here
1172:talk
1149:talk
1139:czar
1123:talk
1103:talk
1051:main
1043:Juno
495:Iyer
109:keep
107:was
55:and
2620:.--
2560:CNN
2543:).
1924:AfD
1841:😼
1801:😼
1765:😼
1729:😼
1688:Red
1670:😼
1601:😼
523:or
63:•
40:•
2643::
2628:)
2595:.
2557:.
2551:—
2503:)
2474:)
2397:)
2369:)
2344:▸₷
2312:)
2297:)
2256:)
2217:.
2179:)
2155:)
2135:)
2114:)
2091:)
2074:)
2045:)
1999:)
1960:.
1935:)
1883:)
1829:—
1789:—
1753:—
1751:.
1717:—
1696:)
1658:—
1650:)
1633:)
1619:)
1589:—
1572:)
1548:)
1533:)
1516:)
1495:)
1478:)
1463:)
1440:)
1423:)
1409:)
1392:)
1367:)
1350:)
1333:)
1312:)
1295:)
1277:)
1236:)
1215:)
1174:)
1166:".
1151:)
1135:.
1125:)
1117:.
1105:)
1054:}}
1048:{{
818::
624::
527:.
450:}}
444:{{
2624:(
2606:.
2570:.
2499:(
2470:(
2440:@
2393:(
2365:(
2352:◂
2348:Ⓑ
2308:(
2293:(
2252:(
2175:(
2151:(
2131:(
2110:(
2087:(
2066:(
2041:(
2010::
2006:@
1995:(
1931:(
1879:(
1839:¢
1836:☏
1799:¢
1796:☏
1763:¢
1760:☏
1727:¢
1724:☏
1668:¢
1665:☏
1646:(
1629:(
1615:(
1599:¢
1596:☏
1568:(
1544:(
1529:(
1512:(
1491:(
1474:(
1459:(
1436:(
1419:(
1405:(
1388:(
1363:(
1346:(
1329:(
1308:(
1291:(
1273:(
1232:(
1211:(
1170:(
1147:(
1121:(
1101:(
973:.
931:.
710:.
143:.
111:.
82:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.