31:
109:
maybe not, but the page looked like an absolute trainwreck before I edited it. Candidates (declared or otherwise) from different parties were lumped into the same categories and for some reason, Newsom's potential candidacy was mixed in with the citations. And yes perhaps it looks excessive, but at
133:
I wonder whether a table would be a better wholesale change though? Could have columns of Name, affiliation, occupation, and status which would be cleaner than having many different sections? Would still be ok to have a table each for Dem/Rep/Other I think. Thoughts?
192:(Please do not submit this page for publication, as it may or may not end up being necessary at all. If the group pursuing this does not meet a signature guideline of 1.5 million by mid-March, the page will remain a draft. Sharing info nevertheless!)
81:
do we really have enough candidates to justify that granularity of formatting? Wouldn't disagree with that styling at a later date, but currently we have more section headings than we do candidates which looks a bit excessive. Best,
277:
212:
295:
The article states that 'the candidates have either declared their candidacy with the
California secretary of state.'Either declared of what? This sentence clearly needs some cleaning...
421:
Cox announced in
February 2021 that he was running for governor in 2022, irrelevant to the 2021 recall election. However, he is not mentioned once in the article. Did he not qualify?
189:
281:
356:
The filing deadline was March 11, 2022. So, all candidates are either in or out, formally. No need to talk anymore about who has "declared" or been "discussed".
188:. If you have information to contribute on this topic specifically, please add it to the Draft on this topic rather than on this page. The link for that is here...
157:
Yeah I can remove the candidates section. Not too sure about the table though since tables for candidates don't appear in other election articles on
Knowledge. --
47:
17:
128:, Could we maybe remove the superfluous 'candidates' section heading? That would cut 3 unnecessary sections out overall which would help slightly.
302:
216:
384:
co-host Nikki
Laurenzo, the 50-year-old Bay Area resident said he will run as an Independent challenging Gov. Gavin Newsom." Ref:
448:
385:
337:
Why do the publicly expressed interest, potential, etc. candidates get a candidate summary but declared candidates don't..?
226:
Good point. Until we know the results of the top two primary, head to head match ups should be in the hypothetical section.
436:
241:
Head to head matchups are not hypothetical as long as the two candidates in them have declared their intention to run.
380:
On March 11, 2022, Michael
Shellenberger filed papers to run for Governor. "In an exclusive interview 3-10-2022 with
246:
459:
440:
411:
397:
365:
346:
326:
310:
285:
265:
250:
235:
220:
201:
166:
149:
119:
97:
322:
38:
388:
It will be interesting to see many running, but the field will narrow based on finance and popular support. --
361:
306:
242:
182:
318:
177:
Hey y'all! A number of the figures discussed in this page have been discussed for the possibility of a
424:
298:
402:
He is already listed in the INDEPENDENT section. The deadline for filing has passed (3-12-2022) --
197:
455:
162:
143:
115:
91:
256:
But we don't know who is going to advance to the general election. So yes, it is hypothetical.
432:
386:
https://fox40.com/inside-california-politics/bay-area-author-to-challenge-newsom-for-governor/
357:
407:
393:
342:
261:
231:
276:
The 2021 recall election isn't the 2022 election, so this is faulty and should be removed.
178:
193:
451:
158:
154:
136:
125:
111:
104:
84:
76:
428:
185:
181:, specifically related to the latest of either five or six recall attempts against
403:
389:
338:
257:
227:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
211:
Why is faulconer in a separate non-collapsible table? It's all hypothetical.
25:
190:
Draft:2021 California gubernatorial recall election
8:
272:Tom steyer article is about recall election
18:Talk:2022 California gubernatorial election
296:
278:2600:1012:B05D:7959:89F0:1563:D9B6:E284
213:2600:1012:B061:C10B:D61:1A9C:4E5B:9767
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
376:Another candidate to challenge Newsom
7:
24:
29:
207:hypothetical polling is faulty
1:
327:04:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
317:I removed the word "either."
311:16:54, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
347:19:32, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
286:22:36, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
167:07:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
150:22:46, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
120:22:32, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
98:22:21, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
266:05:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
251:05:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
236:22:35, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
221:20:54, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
202:22:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
476:
382:Inside California Politics
366:23:30, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
110:least it's organized :) --
447:He didn't end up running.
412:05:17, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
398:05:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
460:19:51, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
441:19:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
42:of past discussions.
352:Needs a major update
417:No mention of Cox?
427:comment added by
333:Candidate summary
313:
301:comment added by
243:Thomascampbell123
67:
66:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
467:
443:
319:David O. Johnson
173:Potential recall
148:
146:
141:
108:
96:
94:
89:
80:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
475:
474:
470:
469:
468:
466:
465:
464:
422:
419:
378:
373:
354:
335:
293:
274:
209:
179:recall election
175:
144:
137:
135:
102:
92:
85:
83:
74:
72:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
473:
471:
463:
462:
418:
415:
377:
374:
369:
353:
350:
334:
331:
330:
329:
292:
289:
273:
270:
269:
268:
239:
238:
208:
205:
174:
171:
170:
169:
152:
131:
129:
71:
68:
65:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
472:
461:
457:
453:
449:
446:
445:
444:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
416:
414:
413:
409:
405:
400:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
375:
372:
368:
367:
363:
359:
351:
349:
348:
344:
340:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
315:
314:
312:
308:
304:
300:
290:
288:
287:
283:
279:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
254:
253:
252:
248:
244:
237:
233:
229:
225:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
206:
204:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
184:
180:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
151:
147:
142:
140:
132:
130:
127:
124:
123:
122:
121:
117:
113:
106:
100:
99:
95:
90:
88:
78:
69:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
423:— Preceding
420:
401:
381:
379:
370:
358:Karichisholm
355:
336:
303:192.219.75.2
297:— Preceding
294:
291:Edit request
275:
240:
210:
186:Gavin Newsom
176:
138:
101:
86:
73:
60:
43:
37:
36:This is an
371:References
70:Formatting
194:PickleG13
61:Archive 1
452:Muboshgu
437:contribs
425:unsigned
299:unsigned
183:Governor
159:Hayden64
155:Darren-M
139:Darren-M
126:Hayden64
112:Hayden64
105:Darren-M
87:Darren-M
77:Hayden64
429:SageTDS
39:archive
404:AstroU
390:AstroU
339:Prcc27
258:Prcc27
228:Prcc27
16:<
456:talk
433:talk
408:talk
394:talk
362:talk
343:talk
323:talk
307:talk
282:talk
262:talk
247:talk
232:talk
217:talk
198:talk
163:talk
145:talk
116:talk
93:talk
458:)
450:–
439:)
435:•
410:)
396:)
364:)
345:)
325:)
309:)
284:)
264:)
249:)
234:)
219:)
200:)
165:)
118:)
454:(
431:(
406:(
392:(
360:(
341:(
321:(
305:(
280:(
260:(
245:(
230:(
215:(
196:(
161:(
114:(
107::
103:@
79::
75:@
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.