577:
550:
732:
680:
256:
587:
941:, or something similar. 'Cola wars' would certainly be a part of that article, but the reverse does not apply. The sources on this article say that Cola wars is/was between two companies. Are there sources that include Keurig Dr Pepper and make it three companies? Why are they not on the article? Unless some can be found that include Keurig Dr Pepper, they have no more business on this article than any other beverage company.
692:
22:
482:
461:
180:
90:
912:"Don't get too hung up on the title of the article" - The title of the article relates to what sources call the subject. It is the key way we can tie sources to the article. We can't alter what it means, or refers to, unless the sources do. Perusal of the sources very much suggest it refers solely to a rivalry between Pespi and Coca Cola.
80:
53:
1125:
Sorry, I was busy and didn't get back to you. The point I've been making and you seem to miss is that "cola wars" is not just the rivalry of Coca-Cola and Pepsi as products, but also a shorthand used for the entire US soda market. Thats what the sources show, and that's why it's relevant. I could use
1028:
is just over a year old and explicitly talks about the "three major players" in the cola wars (using that name) and is especially interesting because it's topic is specifically marketing on social media, that is, it's not just about the historic period 40 years ago where the competition was fiercest,
961:
good enough for you? Actually, though, this does point out that some material on what effects of Coke and Pepsi's intense focus on each other during he peak of the 1980s cola wars had on other companies, especially Dr Pepper, which kinda became the third company by default because of its purchases of
825:
The appearance of Keurig Dr Pepper on the comparison table is unwarranted, unexplained and unrelated to the article subject. The point of the article is to document the rivalry between Pepsi and Coca-Cola. Keurig Dr Pepper simply does not feature in the scope of the article. There are no sources
1329:
stupid person advertising message (SPAM) with nationalists costume was success, since globe unite for cocaine war, which in intentions of nationalists. but live for now 2017 ad was disaster, because cia against antiwar peace protests. so, millions of cia AI bots repressed pepsi. many twitters are AI
1232:
So I've been thinking about this, and I have an alternate proposal: split the chart out into a separate article about the comparison of product lineups. Just can't think of a good name for it. That the three major soda companies have parallel product lines is a notable thing. But this probably isn't
1089:
I forgot to mention your CNN link. It doesn't even mention "Cola Wars", so is irrelevant. What does the
Atlanta Journal-Constitution say about Dr Pepper's role in the Cola Wars? Can it be used as content and a cite? I'm afraid, as unsourced and challenged material, the column on Dr Pepper should
1062:
I'm not saying that Keurig Dr Pepper is not a competitor (third place or otherwise, it doesn't matter), I'm saying they are not considered by the sources as part of the Cola War. If they were, why is this not mentioned (and cited) in the article? Why do they just appear as an unexplained additional
871:
It's included because it shows that the companies compete directly across the board. Don't get too hung up on the title of the article, which is just the common catchy term that caught on on the early 1980s, and is the appropriate common name because of that widespread use. But it shouldn't be taken
855:
Additionally: looking back at the talk page history, I see that this is a long-standing issue, and not the first time that this table has been questioned. But no sensible explanation has been given for it being on this article. It seems pretty straight forward according to
Knowledge (XXG) policy.
1033:
a piece from three weeks ago also about Keurig Dr Pepper's third-main-player status and how they are clearly in a class above any other non-Coke-or-Pepsi company. In other words, the term "cola wars" is about the industry competition as a whole, not just the specific rivalry. And that industry has
883:
And yeah, it's a bit US-centric, but listing all the companies' competing products is going to have to include their large US portfolios. That's not so much because the companies are all US based, but because the US is the largest and most diverse market in terms of products, meaning the companies
999:
If the president of Dr Pepper feels like a "innocent bystander", his company can hardly be part of the "war". The second quote talks about a war between Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola, and how it has impacted on the rest of the industry. Nothing to single out Keurig Dr Pepper, any more than any other
1293:
On this page there is a really useful table comparing the various makers of soda and what they call their flavors. I came across this table on a wikipedia trawl and found it terribly interesting. On going to find it later for reference, however, I had a lot of trouble finding it. I think this is
1159:
Except you're wrong. Perhaps it's because you can't see some of the sources, but they literally discuss Keurig Dr Pepper as a participant. I'm sorry, I don't know what else to say. It appears you cannot garner the whole picture due to silly geographic restrictions (kinda defeats the purpose of a
1194:
and doesn't mention the Cola Wars other than in the headline. It says "Dr Pepper
Snapple is a distant third-place player in the nonalcoholic beverage market". If that is enough to place them as a "combatant" in the Cola Wars, we have to wonder why they don't say this, and why none of the other
1074:
I'm guessing you missed the fourth one from CNN. As for the second you cannot see it's from the
Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and its headline is literally "Dr Pepper Snapple sitting pretty in the cola wars". Could the article do a better job of discussing Keurig Dr Pepper's history including
1058:
Your last source is little better than a blog. But is starts off mentioning Pepsi and Coca-Cola in the Cola Wars, then introduces Dr Pepper as a competitor of the two. Nowhere does it say they are part of the Cola Wars. Indeed, everything about the article is about contrasting Dr Pepper's
1105:
Since you haven't produce any cites that has Keurig Dr Pepper involved in the article topic, other that ones that describe them as the third main competitor in the soft drink market (which I have repeatedly explained to you isn't relevant), and haven't added any to the article, which
887:
As for including Keurig Dr Pepper, they're acknowledged on the industry as the third main, non-generic player, with their own parallel portfolio, and their own national distribution network. They're also the only other company included in joint marketing efforts through the
1252:? But you'd need sources that collate the products and establish that they are in direct competition to each other. It could also include market share figures, or just sales figures, if they can be sourced. Care would be needed to not involve any
1294:
because it's hidden in this page, which is not an intuitive place to find it. I think we should make a new page that is just the comparison table (preferably adding to it what we can) to ease in people finding this important information.
1313:
Coca-Cola Vs Pepsi Cola Wars 2019 movie. original health cocaine nationalists wide patriotic svastika war. movie made by nationalists viacom, viacom is censorship political corporation, used for repression brutality and propaganda.
925:"Keurig Dr Pepper, they're acknowledged on the industry as the third main, non-generic player" - Why is this relevant? Could you please show some sources that mention Keurig Dr Pepper in relation to the article topic.
1325:
cocaine drinks was as ammunition and fuel in not South
America fighting ww2. they not only used nationalists svastika flag at ww2, they always use nationalists flags as religion. "new formula it is like new god"
884:
themselves focus on the US market. Heck, that's why PepsiCo just two days ago announced the replacement of Sierra Mist with Starry, because they are far behind Sprite and 7Up in the lemon-lime segment in the US.
705:
560:
1075:
especially the effect of Coke and Pepsi's business maneuvers in the 80s lead to it being the third main player in the industry? Absolutely. But I fail to see how removing information improves the article.
872:
literally as the companies compete in all segments, not just colas. And the companies are not just their colas; numerous times I've had to remove good faith but misplaced edits about other products on the
532:
1393:
405:
project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
188:
63:
1110:
makes no reference to them other than in this unexplained, unsourced table column, and you appear to be set on having this unsourced and challenged material on the article, I propose I raise a
1373:
522:
1320:
617:
419:
843:
I would propose the Keurig Dr Pepper, at a minimum is removed from the table, unless the company's involvement in the article topic is cited to sources and mentioned within the article.
836:
The table is entirely US-centric, listing products unavailable out of the US without any indication. The Cola Wars may be between two US companies, but the battleground is surely global?
1378:
1368:
498:
384:
243:
896:
shows the delivery guy representing Dr Pepper front and center between the Coca-Cola and Pepsi delivery people. No other company has that status. That's why they belong in the chart.
743:
634:
1403:
710:
1140:
The sources that talk about "Cola Wars" don't mention Keurig Dr Pepper as being involved (or are at best listed as a by-stander), and only talk about Pepsi and Coca Cola. So
489:
466:
1191:
1052:
of them being part of the Cola Wars. (Posing the headline as a question is a common tactic to distance the writer from a questionable fact.) It does not place them in it.
150:
1398:
670:
1408:
1094:
about Keurig Dr Pepper's history, without first demonstrating its relevance to the article topic. Currently there is simply nothing in the article that does this. --
1358:
140:
406:
1388:
928:
The only reason I raised the issue of US-centrism (it's not a significant issue, IMHO) is because you previously justified including Keurig Dr Pepper in order to
660:
1190:, which is about Coca-Cola's history and is used to cite Pepsi offering to sell out to Coca-Cola. Again, nothing about Dr Pepper. The link you provide above is
624:
413:
1055:
Your second source is, I'm afraid, not visible to me due to GDPR legislation. What does it say? Does it say that Keurig Dr Pepper is/was part of the Cola Wars?
1363:
1353:
116:
1413:
1383:
629:
1090:
be removed, so it would help the article if there was something, anything, that was sourced. It's not the responsibility of this article to discuss
1148:
reflected in the sources. Focus in an article is important, so it doesn't get swamped by details that are only relevant in the opinion of editors.--
839:
The table has the taint of original research. Where are the sources that say these products are essentially the same and compete with one another?
266:
103:
58:
800:
600:
555:
193:
932:
US-centrism. Now you say it's not a big deal. So including Keurig Dr Pepper does nothing to address it, and is not a reason for doing so.
1256:, i.e. drawing, or suggesting, any conclusions about the success, failure, dominance, popularity of drinks that isn't in the sources. --
938:
1331:
1321:
https://en.wikipedia.org/File:1927_swastika_manufactured_by_the_Coca-Cola_company_in_Milwaukee_%E2%80%93_being_held_by_-JulianCope.jpg
612:
1198:
If there is a source that mentions Dr Pepper's involvement in the article topic, could you please indicate which one and where? --
1003:
So I'm afraid this source simply re-inforces what I've already said. Whether they have become "the third company" is your opinion.
856:
If reliable sources don't mention a company in relation to the article subject, there is no reason for it being in the article. --
1267:
Been a bit busy lately (sorry for taking so long to get back to you), but I'll work on it when I get the chance. Probably after
962:
Canada Dry and 7Up, which were prompted by antitrust concerns about Coke and/or Pepsi attempting to buy them during that period.
608:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
1021:
956:
33:
889:
115:
related articles on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1186:
Dr Pepper. The only exception is one that mentions them in passing when discussing Sprite. That leaves the cited book
811:
1249:
1164:
web), but that doesn't change the facts that "cola wars" is also used as a shorthand for the soda industry as a whole.
880:
articles because people mistook the articles about the specific brands for the ones about the companies that make them.
395:
1126:
some assistance in incorporating that into the article, but I still see no reason to remove the column of the chart.
1025:
1006:
Do you have a source that makes it clear that when sources talk about "Cola wars", they include Keurig Dr Pepper? --
1317:
796:
The following
Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
737:
750:
437:
767:
39:
21:
1335:
807:
1030:
1299:
1268:
497:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1295:
592:
979:"AS far as the cola wars are concerned, Richard Q. Armstrong feels like one of your typical injured
937:
You are extrapolating the article topic into a wider topic which, if it merits an article, would be
1309:
Coca-Cola Vs Pepsi Cola Wars 2019 movie. original cocaine nationalists wide patriotic svastika war.
1276:
1238:
1169:
1131:
1080:
1039:
967:
901:
391:
756:
1253:
576:
549:
1257:
1199:
1149:
1115:
1095:
1064:
1017:
1007:
945:
922:"And the companies are not just their colas" - Indeed, but that is not the issue I am raising.
857:
844:
697:
289:
255:
833:
There are other companies that also have products in this market, why are they not included?
792:
A Commons file used on this page or its
Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
780:
752:
1111:
679:
1272:
1234:
1178:
Sorry, but that is simply not true. I can see all the web sources on this article and
1165:
1127:
1076:
1035:
963:
897:
348:
1347:
605:
691:
314:
806:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —
374:
95:
1318:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Western_use_of_the_swastika_in_the_early_20th_century
915:"the companies compete directly across the board" - Indeed. But the issue is
687:
582:
85:
986:"the price-cutting by Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola that has become one weapon in
873:
494:
481:
460:
318:
604:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
179:
976:
Good source. Some pertinent quotes from it (with my emphasis in bold);
89:
754:
326:
893:
877:
390:
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
370:
352:
322:
306:
302:
298:
112:
1339:
1303:
1280:
1262:
1242:
1204:
1173:
1154:
1135:
1120:
1100:
1084:
1069:
1043:
1012:
971:
950:
905:
892:
trade group. Even a quick glance at the trade group's home page
862:
849:
815:
378:
344:
310:
294:
108:
79:
52:
757:
15:
678:
178:
826:
cited that include Keurig Dr Pepper in this rivalry.
507:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Marketing & Advertising
233:
228:
223:
218:
1034:
three major players. The chart should list all three.
1289:
Separate the drink comparison table into its own page
1394:
Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
493:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
107:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1374:
Low-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
191:, a task force which is currently considered to be
161:
939:Competing products within the US soft drink market
414:Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested images of food
1379:WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
1369:Start-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
510:Template:WikiProject Marketing & Advertising
8:
1404:Low-importance American television articles
19:
726:
544:
455:
206:
158:
125:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Food and drink
47:
645:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
1399:Start-Class American television articles
187:This article is within the scope of the
1409:American television task force articles
546:
490:WikiProject Marketing & Advertising
457:
49:
1359:Low-importance Food and drink articles
1059:marketing approach from the other two.
1389:Low-importance United States articles
7:
598:This article is within the scope of
513:Marketing & Advertising articles
487:This article is within the scope of
101:This article is within the scope of
1364:WikiProject Food and drink articles
1354:Start-Class Food and drink articles
412:Provide photographs and images for
263:Here are some tasks you can do for
128:Template:WikiProject Food and drink
38:It is of interest to the following
1414:WikiProject United States articles
1384:Start-Class United States articles
648:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
1250:Comparison of soft drink products
1144:above definition of Cola Wars is
801:Pepsi-Cola and Coca-Cola cans.jpg
1248:Sounds like an excellent idea.
1048:Your first source considers the
1029:but how it's still ongoing. And
730:
690:
585:
575:
548:
480:
459:
418:Consider joining this project's
254:
88:
78:
51:
20:
665:This article has been rated as
527:This article has been rated as
440:from the project's tasks pages.
383:Participate in project-related
145:This article has been rated as
1340:06:04, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
1188:For God, Country and Coca-Cola
706:American television task force
403:{{WikiProject Food and drink}}
1:
890:American Beverage Association
829:Other issues with the table;
816:15:51, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
703:This article is supported by
501:and see a list of open tasks.
119:and see a list of open tasks.
1281:22:28, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
1263:15:03, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
1243:05:04, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
1205:12:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
1174:14:59, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
1155:18:28, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
1136:14:42, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
1121:09:47, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
1101:21:20, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
1085:23:03, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
1070:15:20, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
1044:17:43, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
1013:17:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
972:16:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
951:11:44, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
906:16:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
863:15:11, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
850:11:35, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
504:Marketing & Advertising
467:Marketing & Advertising
1430:
671:project's importance scale
267:WikiProject Food and drink
241:To edit this page, select
151:project's importance scale
104:WikiProject Food and drink
990:war has been forced upon
779:This page is archived by
686:
664:
601:WikiProject United States
570:
526:
475:
210:Food and Drink task list:
205:
186:
157:
144:
73:
46:
1304:17:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
992:the rest of the industry
606:United States of America
398:to learn how to do this.
1063:column on this table?--
131:Food and drink articles
683:
651:United States articles
436:Note: These lists are
361:articles currently at
335:articles currently at
283:Status or below up to
183:
28:This article is rated
1269:New York Fashion Week
682:
420:Assessment task force
182:
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
593:United States portal
385:deletion discussions
189:Beverages Task Force
981:innocent bystanders
619:Articles Requested!
279:articles currently
162:Related taskforces:
1254:original synthesis
1233:the place for it.
958:The New York Times
808:Community Tech bot
684:
396:WP:Handling trivia
290:Agaricus bisporus
184:
34:content assessment
789:
788:
784:
725:
724:
721:
720:
717:
716:
698:Television portal
543:
542:
539:
538:
454:
453:
450:
449:
446:
445:
433:
432:
293:(i.e. mushroom),
275:Help bring these
201:
200:
1421:
1260:
1202:
1152:
1118:
1098:
1067:
1010:
948:
860:
847:
821:Keurig Dr Pepper
778:
758:
734:
733:
727:
700:
695:
694:
653:
652:
649:
646:
643:
595:
590:
589:
588:
579:
572:
571:
566:
563:
552:
545:
533:importance scale
515:
514:
511:
508:
505:
484:
477:
476:
471:
463:
456:
441:
258:
250:
249:
207:
169:
159:
133:
132:
129:
126:
123:
98:
93:
92:
82:
75:
74:
69:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1429:
1428:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1344:
1343:
1323:
1311:
1291:
1258:
1200:
1150:
1116:
1096:
1065:
1008:
946:
858:
845:
823:
794:
785:
759:
753:
731:
696:
689:
650:
647:
644:
641:
640:
639:
625:Become a Member
591:
586:
584:
564:
558:
512:
509:
506:
503:
502:
469:
442:
435:
429:
426:in this section
359:High Importance
259:
238:
167:
130:
127:
124:
121:
120:
94:
87:
67:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
1427:
1425:
1417:
1416:
1411:
1406:
1401:
1396:
1391:
1386:
1381:
1376:
1371:
1366:
1361:
1356:
1346:
1345:
1316:
1310:
1307:
1290:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1196:
1192:available here
1103:
1060:
1056:
1053:
1004:
1001:
997:
996:
995:
984:
974:
942:
935:
934:
933:
926:
923:
920:
913:
885:
881:
866:
865:
841:
840:
837:
834:
822:
819:
804:
803:
793:
790:
787:
786:
777:
776:
773:
772:
771:
770:
762:
761:
760:
755:
751:
749:
748:
735:
723:
722:
719:
718:
715:
714:
711:Low-importance
702:
701:
685:
675:
674:
667:Low-importance
663:
657:
656:
654:
638:
637:
632:
627:
622:
615:
613:Template Usage
609:
597:
596:
580:
568:
567:
565:Low‑importance
553:
541:
540:
537:
536:
529:Low-importance
525:
519:
518:
516:
499:the discussion
485:
473:
472:
470:Low‑importance
464:
452:
451:
448:
447:
444:
443:
434:
431:
430:
428:
427:
416:
410:
399:
388:
381:
355:
349:French cuisine
333:Top Importance
329:
277:Top Importance
272:
261:
260:
253:
248:
247:
237:
236:
231:
226:
221:
215:
212:
211:
203:
202:
199:
198:
185:
175:
174:
172:
170:
164:
163:
155:
154:
147:Low-importance
143:
137:
136:
134:
122:Food and drink
117:the discussion
100:
99:
83:
71:
70:
68:Low‑importance
59:Food and drink
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1426:
1415:
1412:
1410:
1407:
1405:
1402:
1400:
1397:
1395:
1392:
1390:
1387:
1385:
1382:
1380:
1377:
1375:
1372:
1370:
1367:
1365:
1362:
1360:
1357:
1355:
1352:
1351:
1349:
1342:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1327:
1322:
1319:
1315:
1308:
1306:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1288:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1261:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1206:
1203:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1182:of them even
1181:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1153:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1119:
1113:
1109:
1104:
1102:
1099:
1093:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1068:
1061:
1057:
1054:
1051:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1032:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1011:
1005:
1002:
998:
993:
989:
985:
982:
978:
977:
975:
973:
969:
965:
960:
959:
954:
953:
952:
949:
943:
940:
936:
931:
927:
924:
921:
918:
914:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
903:
899:
895:
891:
886:
882:
879:
875:
870:
869:
868:
867:
864:
861:
854:
853:
852:
851:
848:
838:
835:
832:
831:
830:
827:
820:
818:
817:
813:
809:
802:
799:
798:
797:
791:
782:
775:
774:
769:
766:
765:
764:
763:
746:
745:
740:
739:
729:
728:
712:
709:(assessed as
708:
707:
699:
693:
688:
681:
677:
676:
672:
668:
662:
659:
658:
655:
642:United States
636:
633:
631:
628:
626:
623:
621:
620:
616:
614:
611:
610:
607:
603:
602:
594:
583:
581:
578:
574:
573:
569:
562:
557:
556:United States
554:
551:
547:
534:
530:
524:
521:
520:
517:
500:
496:
492:
491:
486:
483:
479:
478:
474:
468:
465:
462:
458:
439:
425:
424:project ideas
421:
417:
415:
411:
408:
404:
400:
397:
393:
389:
386:
382:
380:
376:
372:
368:
365:status up to
364:
360:
356:
354:
350:
346:
342:
339:status up to
338:
334:
330:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
291:
286:
282:
278:
274:
273:
270:
269:
268:
262:
257:
252:
251:
246:
245:
240:
239:
235:
232:
230:
227:
225:
222:
220:
217:
216:
214:
213:
209:
208:
204:
196:
195:
190:
181:
177:
176:
173:
171:
166:
165:
160:
156:
152:
148:
142:
139:
138:
135:
118:
114:
110:
106:
105:
97:
91:
86:
84:
81:
77:
76:
72:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1332:74.97.195.63
1328:
1324:
1312:
1292:
1259:Escape Orbit
1231:
1201:Escape Orbit
1187:
1183:
1179:
1161:
1151:Escape Orbit
1145:
1141:
1117:Escape Orbit
1107:
1097:Escape Orbit
1091:
1066:Escape Orbit
1049:
1009:Escape Orbit
991:
987:
980:
957:
947:Escape Orbit
929:
916:
859:Escape Orbit
846:Escape Orbit
842:
828:
824:
805:
795:
742:
736:
704:
666:
630:Project Talk
618:
599:
528:
488:
423:
402:
366:
362:
358:
357:Bring these
340:
336:
332:
331:Bring these
315:Ham and eggs
288:
284:
280:
276:
265:
264:
242:
192:
146:
102:
40:WikiProjects
1296:Sallysballs
1195:sources do.
1050:possibility
781:ClueBot III
438:transcluded
422:. List any
407:select here
375:Burger King
96:Food portal
30:Start-class
1348:Categories
1162:world wide
1020:, they're
919:companies?
561:Television
1273:oknazevad
1235:oknazevad
1166:oknazevad
1128:oknazevad
1077:oknazevad
1036:oknazevad
1022:out there
964:oknazevad
898:oknazevad
874:Coca-Cola
495:Marketing
392:WP:Trivia
319:Soy sauce
287:status:
64:Beverages
1092:anything
1026:this one
1024:. Heck,
1000:company.
738:Archives
401:Add the
369:status:
343:status:
194:inactive
1184:mention
669:on the
531:on the
224:history
149:on the
1330:bots.
1031:here's
635:Alerts
327:Yogurt
36:scale.
1114:. --
1108:still
988:their
930:avoid
917:which
878:Pepsi
744:Index
371:Apple
353:Sugar
323:Sushi
307:Drink
303:Curry
299:Bread
234:purge
229:watch
113:drink
1336:talk
1300:talk
1277:talk
1239:talk
1180:none
1170:talk
1142:your
1132:talk
1081:talk
1040:talk
968:talk
902:talk
894:here
876:and
812:talk
394:and
379:Fish
345:Beer
311:Food
295:Beef
244:here
219:edit
111:and
109:food
1146:not
1112:RFC
1018:Yes
955:Is
661:Low
523:Low
141:Low
1350::
1338:)
1302:)
1279:)
1271:.
1241:)
1172:)
1134:)
1083:)
1042:)
983:."
970:)
944:--
904:)
814:)
747:)
713:).
559::
377:,
373:,
367:FA
363:GA
351:,
347:,
341:FA
337:GA
325:,
321:,
317:,
313:,
309:,
305:,
301:,
297:,
285:GA
271::
168:/
62::
1334:(
1298:(
1275:(
1237:(
1168:(
1130:(
1079:(
1038:(
994:"
966:(
900:(
810:(
783:.
768:1
741:(
673:.
535:.
409:.
387:.
281:B
197:.
153:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
