78:
60:
88:
33:
292:
I agree that this looks as if it might count as a personal essay, but there's no urgency about this. I think it would be a Good Thing if we were to contact some people from
Colkirk: we could ask about the status of the photos from the Colkirk Remembered site (i.e., establish when they were taken),
276:
Given that this is mostly from a presentation from someone called Paul
Routledge, whose credentials are unknown, and that no sources are cited for the information he presents, this should definitely be removed in its current form, but I'm tempted to see whether it could be added to wikisource.
307:
There is so much on the
Colkirk website which looks "interesting" but sadly lacks sources I think all you can do is ask about "everything", and hope that you end up talking to someone who can provide the requisite sources such that it can be included in the article. If you point them at
215:
look to be PD. Purely mechanical scans of sufficiently old photos are PD under US law, and are presumed to be PD under
British law. Of course this must be verified, and note that only some of the photos are asserted to be sufficiently old. —
196:
Yes, there are some photos. No, they do not look to be PD. That said, if anyone cares to approach the website owner and, through them, the authors of the photographs (or their estate) and ask, they might well get permission to use them.
234:
has the summary, but I doubt that it will be more than 70 years after the death of the author in many cases. Not that the article would need many, of course, so it'd be worth trying to find out.
293:
and we could ask about the accuracy of the history. For such a small locality, I think that an email or two should be sufficient sourcing. I'll ask: is there anything else I should ask? —
254:, copyright has expired on all photographs taken before 1945, unless a copyright extension was obtained, which I understand happens only for commercially important sound recordings. —
343:
134:
338:
140:
231:
110:
348:
101:
65:
40:
251:
46:
109:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
309:
317:
282:
239:
202:
312:
for useful ideas but stress WP's policies then you might well get what we want. Good luck! —
298:
259:
221:
186:
169:
17:
313:
278:
235:
198:
93:
332:
211:
I apologise for my carelessness in wording my grandparent quote: I should have said
77:
59:
83:
106:
321:
302:
286:
263:
243:
225:
206:
190:
26:
39:
This article has not yet been rated on
Knowledge (XXG)'s
105:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
139:This article has not yet received a rating on the
230:"Sufficiently old" is very old under UK law.
8:
344:Unknown-importance England-related articles
54:
32:
30:
232:Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988
56:
7:
99:This article is within the scope of
339:Unassessed England-related articles
119:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject England
45:It is of interest to the following
25:
252:the Intellectual Property Office
86:
76:
58:
31:
1:
113:and see a list of open tasks.
122:Template:WikiProject England
365:
165:There are some photos at:
141:project's importance scale
349:WikiProject England pages
322:11:20, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
303:08:59, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
287:08:36, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
138:
71:
53:
264:07:47, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
244:19:18, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
226:18:44, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
207:12:48, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
191:11:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
125:England-related articles
18:Talk:Common End, Colkirk
102:WikiProject England
170:Colkirk Remembered
41:content assessment
301:
272:"History" section
262:
224:
189:
181:look to be PD. —
155:
154:
151:
150:
147:
146:
16:(Redirected from
356:
297:
258:
220:
185:
127:
126:
123:
120:
117:
96:
91:
90:
89:
80:
73:
72:
62:
55:
36:
35:
34:
27:
21:
364:
363:
359:
358:
357:
355:
354:
353:
329:
328:
295:Charles Stewart
274:
256:Charles Stewart
218:Charles Stewart
183:Charles Stewart
180:
177:
163:
124:
121:
118:
115:
114:
92:
87:
85:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
362:
360:
352:
351:
346:
341:
331:
330:
327:
326:
325:
324:
273:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
248:
247:
246:
178:
175:
173:
172:
162:
159:
157:
153:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
137:
131:
130:
128:
111:the discussion
98:
97:
94:England portal
81:
69:
68:
63:
51:
50:
44:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
361:
350:
347:
345:
342:
340:
337:
336:
334:
323:
319:
315:
311:
306:
305:
304:
300:
296:
291:
290:
289:
288:
284:
280:
271:
265:
261:
257:
253:
250:According to
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
228:
227:
223:
219:
214:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
195:
194:
193:
192:
188:
184:
171:
168:
167:
166:
160:
158:
142:
136:
133:
132:
129:
112:
108:
104:
103:
95:
84:
82:
79:
75:
74:
70:
67:
64:
61:
57:
52:
48:
42:
38:
29:
28:
19:
294:
275:
255:
217:
212:
182:
174:
164:
156:
100:
47:WikiProjects
310:WP:UKCITIES
277:Thoughts? —
333:Categories
314:ClickRick
279:ClickRick
236:ClickRick
199:ClickRick
116:England
107:England
66:England
299:(talk)
260:(talk)
222:(talk)
187:(talk)
161:Photos
43:scale.
318:talk
283:talk
240:talk
213:some
203:talk
179:Some
176:They
135:???
335::
320:)
285:)
242:)
205:)
316:(
281:(
238:(
201:(
197:—
143:.
49::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
