819:
arbitrary--there is no point in having hundreds of red links so all red links were dropped. all the ones listed have passed the Wiki rules for notability, which is a selection process 100% independent of the magazine. Are there notable authors for
Commentary who lack an article? Guillaume2303 made that allegation up out of thin air, he did not do the research (he denied the existence of the full list of Commentary authors) --he does not know what he is talking about. He of course is free to start articles on these mystery people he knows so little about. There is in fact extensive discussion in the article about contributors, but only a very short list is included in the main text. Irrelevant comparisons to the
824:
that these notable authors chose
Commentary as their outlet tells readers a great deal about the magazine, and the list-link-to-wiki is the only way to handle it without an article 10x or 50x times longer that has a capsule bio on each author. I have a great respect for Dutch scholars--last week I bought plane tickets to Middleburg to give a paper at a Dutch-sponsored scholarly history conference myself--but it's a research paper with a political topic and I'd be surprised to see many neuroscientists like Guillaume2303 in the audience -- my experience is that they are not familiar with American politics and don't come to history conferences.
1090:
if there is a rational and provable criterion for selecting within them (The only one that immediately occurs to me is more than X number of items, but someone could have published a single very important one.). The other lists do generally make an attempt at added value: years of active publication, and field of their activity-- or writing in the magazine if different. These aren't OR either, and could helpfully be added. (Considering the drastic shift in the nature of the magazine, dates would be particularly appropriate, especially for those writing on politics.)
386:
365:
871:----Good faith involves not blanking other editors hard work before discussion, or slapping scare tags --which believe it or not annoys us editors who worked on this article long before today. It means respecting the work of people who know what they are talking about. Yes it's true that no one needs any knowledge of history whatever to erase and destroy hard work--any kid can do that--but it violates good faith. The names of contributors all came from
396:
189:
773:. Not only is such a long list of names without any explanation/discussion boring/unencyclopedic, but the inclusion criterion is rather arbitrary: only notable people with a wiki article (notable people that don't yet have a wiki article are excluded). Inclusion of such a list is rather unusual and simply cannot possibly become a standard feature of our coverage of magazines/journals/newspapers. Imagine the lists we would get for
1016:
development of the magazine. Following your reasoning, we should list everyone who ever published anything in this magazine. Just limiting yourself to those people who have a wikiarticle is rather arbitrary, you must know as well as I do that our coverage in biographies is far from complete. In short, this list is arbitrary and there are no sources attesting to the significance of the list entries for the magazine. --
686:
179:
74:
158:
53:
284:
263:
84:
22:
547:. The term “neoconservative,” unfortunately, has been used as a code-word for Jews. Those who use the term “neoconservative,” use it shield an anti-Jewish bias, in that they claim to not have hostility to Jews but only to neoconservatives; and this article further connects Jews to this much maligned political persuasion; since
1085:
So the question is its appropriateness. Looking at the other lists, I am not sure they are all complete--some may rather be selections of those who have some particular distinctive notability in connection with the publication which can presumably be shown by a specific source, or who are so famous
823:
are unproductive--it's another wild exercise of the imagination to compare these two periodicals. A magazine like
Commentary is important BECAUSE of its many influential contributors, that's why the readers need the list. They can check out for themselves who the magazine published. Indeed, the fact
1093:
I must admit that my instinctive reaction on seeing this was the same as
Guillaume2303's. But thinking it out, my instinct was wrong. It probably was too much influenced by conventional publications. The material is relevant; the material is helpful to the reader both for research or browsing; the
1089:
I therefore think the content is appropriate. There is no reason why we could not do this more generally. There is of course a difference from alumni--one is an alumnus of 3 or 4 schools;, but a writer can have written in dozens of magazines. So there would be a reason for a selective list instead,
1030:
a magazine of opinion is what we're talking about here--not a scientific journal. Opinion leaders are people who get invited to contribute to the leading opinion magazines. There is nothing "arbitrary" (it consists of all contributors validated as notable--which is exactly what
Guillaume2303 asked
1015:
No, it doesn't. It fails "because they are associated with or significantly contribute to the list topic". All these people ever did was contribute one (sometimes a few) articles to this magazine. There is no evidence, even less sources, that by doing so they had any significant influence on the
818:
Guillaume2303 is dead wrong. there is no OR and there is no synthesis. The contributors were all selected by the
Commentary editors and Commentary did the OR to compile the full list, which (contrary to his statement) is at their website (see footnote 9). The inclusion criterion is not at all
854:
relevant, please think about it for a moment. I have no clue why you tell us about your respect for Dutch scholars and the meeting you are going to, that is absolutely irrelevant. And I don't need to go to history conferences to be able to edit this article. I'm signing on for the evening, hope
996:
the importance of a magazine of opinion depends very largely on the opinions of its contributors. What the editors do is assemble these contributors and give them an outlet. That makes it essential to know who contributed. The Wiki rules explicitly allow this function: WP: Directory says
501:
The magazine's official name is one word: Commentary. In theory, this entry should be redirected to an entry called "Commentary." And all references in the article to "Commentary
Magazine" should be changed to either "Commentary" or "Commentary magazine" (with a small "m").
1136:
This is a virtually non-sensical comment. Harper's is generally regarded as the flag-bearing publication of the literary, intellectual left. Recently, for instance, they published excepts from the marginalia found in a copy of
Emerson's essays written by John Locke. Anything
896:?? My point about the Dutch trip is that no scientists show up at conferences where they could learn history; they instead do better by a focus on their own span of expertise. Finally the claim that Wiki usually does not list famous contributors to magazines is false (see
1079:
alumni lists, or lists of notable people from a place, or list of people in general--the criterion is to either have a
Knowledge (XXG) article or be obviously qualified for one, and to have a provable connection. (In the case of a magazine, the provable connection is
735:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on
1086:
that anywhere they've written in it should be mentioned; Obviously, in a case like this, the connection is apt to be less obvious and more a matter of OR than what is done here, of listing them all, unless a firm distinction can be made.
850:. Footnote 9 goes to their "search" page and the link "All Authors" does not work for me. In any case, from your comments it seems that this goes to a list of everybody who has ever published in this magazine. The comparisons I made
1074:
First , it is neither OR nor SYN. it's basic factual data. Compiling a list like this is a purely mechanical operation from public sources. Limiting to people with a WP article is not arbitrary or OR: it's what we do with
885:
Abel, Lionel (6); Abelson, Raziel (1); Abrahams, Israel (1); Abrams, Charles (1), Abrams, Elliott (9), Abrams, Rachel (1);....Zakaria, Fareed (1); Zubrin, Robert (1); Zukosky, Jerome (1); and "author, unknown
1148:
732:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with
Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
1646:
426:
562:
and neoconservatives; without clearly defining “neoconservativism” and what relation, if any, such a political persuasion has to Jews, Jewish culture, and Jewish American concerns.
1113:
I think the list is ok at the moment but if the article gets longer or more editors are added to the list, the list should become a categorie of it's own linked to this article.
443:
1557:
Because it may have some use outside this article context, such as addition to Wikidata or a relevant standalone list, I am noting the diff here for reference and convenience.
793:
people selected?) In addition, this list is absolutely uninformative. Only someone who knows all these people could perhaps glean something from it. Only if there are sources
1187:
1492:
1488:
1474:
1382:
1378:
1364:
1239:
1235:
1221:
479:
345:
245:
1641:
1611:
469:
235:
433:
999:
Of course, there is nothing wrong with having lists if their entries are famous because they are associated with or significantly contribute to the list topic."
565:
Anti-neoconservative rhetoric appears very similar to anti-Zionist rhetoric in that hostility to both neoconservatism and Zionism are a cover for antisemitism.
334:
1058:
I would like to hear other editors' opinions about the discussion above, whether or not inclusion of a list of contributors is appropriate in this article. --
1651:
438:
140:
1616:
1094:
material is not trivial. The principle is NOT PAPER. Knowledge (XXG) is hypertext, and that makes cross references of this sort particularly valuable.
713:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
710:
211:
1626:
324:
737:
729:
725:
702:
1601:
130:
1636:
1631:
300:
1606:
741:
409:
370:
1340:
202:
163:
106:
1350:
1152:
1621:
1188:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080829130705/http://www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm/what-does-reform-judaism-stand-for--11393
421:
291:
268:
1596:
1470:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1360:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
528:
417:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
97:
58:
1191:
33:
978:
105:-related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1535:
1425:
1282:
1121:
1460:
671:
1577:
1562:
801:
the magazine, would discussion of a particular contributor be warranted. In the absence of that, it should go. --
1491:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1381:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1238:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
751:
39:
1526:
1452:
1416:
1332:
1273:
1179:
1063:
1021:
860:
806:
1144:
1031:
for earlier.) If Commentary had only a handful of these folks it would not be a major magazine of opinion.
1448:
941:
921:
842:. What you are writing is so wrong, that I hardly know where to start. The contributors in that list were
667:
1341:
https://web.archive.org/web/20061225081010/http://www.americanjewisharchives.org/aja/journal/index05.html
1298:
965:
721:
693:
503:
1510:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1498:
1444:
1400:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1388:
1324:
1257:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1245:
1171:
1059:
1017:
933:
856:
802:
582:
517:
299:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
210:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1572:
Given the discussion above from a decade ago, perhaps it should be remade in particular as a category.
1451:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1331:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1178:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
698:
1573:
1558:
1351:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070311023304/http://www.vmbooksusa.com/acatalog/Forthcoming_Titles.html
1212:
525:
401:
697:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
21:
747:
513:
194:
986:
1344:
974:
909:
901:
775:
1495:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1385:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1242:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
770:
385:
364:
1511:
1401:
1258:
1306:
1036:
1006:
953:
829:
1354:
982:
1118:
592:
1518:
1408:
1265:
1192:
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm/what-does-reform-judaism-stand-for--11393
839:
945:
925:
917:
780:
578:
521:
875:
no Wiki editor invented it. (what we did do was drop useless red links). Re footnote 9:
766:
714:
1477:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1367:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1224:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
913:
588:
569:
89:
1517:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1484:
1407:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1374:
1264:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1231:
685:
1590:
1101:
970:
414:
1461:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120312131600/http://www.commentarymagazine.com/search/
892:
like a monthly opinion magazine?? he does not say-- perhaps Guillaume2303 means the
1302:
1156:
1032:
1002:
949:
929:
825:
620:
616:
600:
207:
1581:
1566:
1540:
1430:
1310:
1287:
1125:
1114:
1105:
1067:
1040:
1025:
1010:
991:
957:
864:
833:
810:
755:
675:
643:
628:
572:
532:
506:
1483:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1373:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1230:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
937:
897:
651:
There is an actual editorial fight over french neo-conservatist news magazine
636:
391:
184:
178:
157:
79:
1001:
Does it help the readers to understand the subject: it most certainly does.
1464:
797:
from this magazine that comment on the importance of a certain contributor
413:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
283:
262:
73:
52:
1096:
612:
596:
296:
635:
On its own website it claims to be "the flagship of neoconservatism".
585:
102:
905:
659:
I started ironizing about actual poltical situation in France and a
604:
785:. (The latter has a list, which is properly tagged for sourcing:
709:
Knowledge (XXG) article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
608:
1345:
http://www.americanjewisharchives.org/aja/journal/index05.html
543:
I object to the pejorative term “neoconservative” to describe
15:
611:
because the original neoconservatives were Jews who felt the
558:
as being a “neoconservative” publication are hostile to both
1197:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
684:
1455:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1355:
http://www.vmbooksusa.com/acatalog/Forthcoming_Titles.html
1335:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1182:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1551:
1328:
1175:
1554:
the long list of contributors to cut down on cruft.
879:-- well it works for me and produced 1072 names of
295:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
206:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1487:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1377:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1234:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
740:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
551:is a publication of the American Jewish Committee.
968:material, and should not be included the article.
1546:List of contributors removed, noted for reference
1647:C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
1473:This message was posted before February 2018.
1363:This message was posted before February 2018.
1220:This message was posted before February 2018.
665:May be you should go and see what can be done.
8:
730:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline
1141:academic would have to contain equations.
681:Fair use rationale for Image:Commentary.jpg
1443:I have just modified one external link on
1170:I have just modified one external link on
359:
257:
152:
47:
1465:http://www.commentarymagazine.com/search/
1323:I have just modified 2 external links on
964:I agree with Guillaume2303, this is pure
512:I agree, and I'm moving the article from
454:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
539:Remove the Designation "Neoconservative"
350:for tips on how to improve this article.
220:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Conservatism
1149:2605:E000:81E0:AA01:5814:5F3A:BE74:87C9
361:
259:
154:
49:
19:
1642:Low-importance United States articles
1612:High-importance Conservatism articles
1209:to let others know (documentation at
309:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Magazines
7:
407:This article is within the scope of
346:WikiProject Magazines' writing guide
289:This article is within the scope of
200:This article is within the scope of
95:This article is within the scope of
855:you'll have cooled off tomorrow. --
115:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Judaism
38:It is of interest to the following
1652:WikiProject United States articles
457:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
1617:WikiProject Conservatism articles
1447:. Please take a moment to review
1327:. Please take a moment to review
1174:. Please take a moment to review
877:All Authors does not work for me.
223:Template:WikiProject Conservatism
1627:Low-importance magazine articles
1132:More scholarly... than Harper's?
728:. Using one of the templates at
394:
384:
363:
282:
261:
187:
177:
156:
82:
72:
51:
20:
1602:Low-importance Judaism articles
474:This article has been rated as
329:This article has been rated as
240:This article has been rated as
135:This article has been rated as
1637:C-Class United States articles
1632:WikiProject Magazines articles
742:Media copyright questions page
573:21:43, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
312:Template:WikiProject Magazines
1:
1607:C-Class Conservatism articles
1288:16:40, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
756:20:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
711:boilerplate fair use template
657:Started yesterday. My fault.
303:and see a list of open tasks.
214:and see a list of open tasks.
109:and see a list of open tasks.
1541:06:12, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
1301:ever Commentary's editor? --
738:criteria for speedy deletion
623:. And one more question: if
507:02:31, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
118:Template:WikiProject Judaism
1431:08:01, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
1311:00:30, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
846:selected by the editors of
1668:
1504:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1440:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1394:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1320:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1251:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1167:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1157:22:34, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
1126:00:42, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
1106:04:36, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
1068:16:14, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
1041:11:58, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
1026:11:54, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
1011:10:26, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
992:21:27, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
958:20:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
865:19:26, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
834:18:23, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
811:17:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
722:the image description page
676:08:38, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
480:project's importance scale
335:project's importance scale
246:project's importance scale
141:project's importance scale
1622:C-Class magazine articles
1582:15:00, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
1567:14:57, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
724:and edit it to include a
644:23:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
595:. It simply meant former
577:I respectfully disagree.
473:
410:WikiProject United States
379:
341:
328:
277:
239:
172:
134:
67:
46:
1597:C-Class Judaism articles
703:explanation or rationale
627:isn't a neoconservative
415:United States of America
203:WikiProject Conservatism
1436:External links modified
1316:External links modified
1163:External links modified
894:New York Times Magazine
533:22:21, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
942:The Outlook (New York)
922:London Review of Books
761:"Contributors" section
689:
581:was a label coined by
554:The two references to
460:United States articles
28:This article is rated
1445:Commentary (magazine)
1325:Commentary (magazine)
1172:Commentary (magazine)
934:The American Prospect
765:This section is pure
705:as to why its use in
688:
583:Commentary (magazine)
518:Commentary (magazine)
292:WikiProject Magazines
226:Conservatism articles
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1485:regular verification
1375:regular verification
1232:regular verification
883:authors as follows:
694:Image:Commentary.jpg
402:United States portal
1475:After February 2018
1365:After February 2018
1222:After February 2018
1201:parameter below to
514:Commentary Magazine
428:Articles Requested!
195:Conservatism portal
98:WikiProject Judaism
1529:InternetArchiveBot
1480:InternetArchiveBot
1419:InternetArchiveBot
1370:InternetArchiveBot
1276:InternetArchiveBot
1227:InternetArchiveBot
902:Dissent (magazine)
776:The New York Times
726:fair use rationale
690:
34:content assessment
1505:
1395:
1252:
1147:comment added by
910:Harper's Magazine
888:Why is the daily
840:assume good faith
767:original research
668:Der letzte Konsul
531:
494:
493:
490:
489:
486:
485:
358:
357:
354:
353:
315:magazine articles
256:
255:
252:
251:
151:
150:
147:
146:
1659:
1539:
1530:
1503:
1502:
1481:
1429:
1420:
1393:
1392:
1371:
1297:Was a man named
1286:
1277:
1250:
1249:
1228:
1216:
1159:
1131:
990:
791:those particular
701:but there is no
641:
593:Norman Podhoretz
524:
462:
461:
458:
455:
452:
404:
399:
398:
397:
388:
381:
380:
375:
367:
360:
317:
316:
313:
310:
307:
286:
279:
278:
273:
265:
258:
228:
227:
224:
221:
218:
197:
192:
191:
190:
181:
174:
173:
168:
160:
153:
123:
122:
121:Judaism articles
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1667:
1666:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1587:
1586:
1574:Freelance-frank
1559:Freelance-frank
1548:
1533:
1528:
1496:
1489:have permission
1479:
1453:this simple FaQ
1438:
1423:
1418:
1386:
1379:have permission
1369:
1333:this simple FaQ
1318:
1295:
1280:
1275:
1243:
1236:have permission
1226:
1210:
1180:this simple FaQ
1165:
1142:
1134:
969:
946:Time (magazine)
926:National Review
918:Life (magazine)
763:
683:
637:
607:. It refers to
579:Neoconservative
541:
499:
459:
456:
453:
450:
449:
448:
434:Become a Member
400:
395:
393:
373:
314:
311:
308:
305:
304:
271:
242:High-importance
225:
222:
219:
216:
215:
193:
188:
186:
167:High‑importance
166:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
83:
81:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
1665:
1663:
1655:
1654:
1649:
1644:
1639:
1634:
1629:
1624:
1619:
1614:
1609:
1604:
1599:
1589:
1588:
1585:
1584:
1547:
1544:
1523:
1522:
1515:
1468:
1467:
1459:Added archive
1437:
1434:
1413:
1412:
1405:
1358:
1357:
1349:Added archive
1347:
1339:Added archive
1317:
1314:
1294:
1291:
1270:
1269:
1262:
1195:
1194:
1186:Added archive
1164:
1161:
1133:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1108:
1091:
1087:
1082:
1081:
1071:
1070:
1054:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
962:
961:
960:
914:In These Times
868:
867:
821:New York Times
762:
759:
748:BetacommandBot
682:
679:
666:
664:
658:
656:
650:
648:
647:
646:
589:Irving Kristol
540:
537:
536:
535:
504:68.198.233.112
498:
495:
492:
491:
488:
487:
484:
483:
476:Low-importance
472:
466:
465:
463:
447:
446:
441:
436:
431:
424:
422:Template Usage
418:
406:
405:
389:
377:
376:
374:Low‑importance
368:
356:
355:
352:
351:
339:
338:
331:Low-importance
327:
321:
320:
318:
301:the discussion
287:
275:
274:
272:Low‑importance
266:
254:
253:
250:
249:
238:
232:
231:
229:
212:the discussion
199:
198:
182:
170:
169:
161:
149:
148:
145:
144:
137:Low-importance
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
90:Judaism portal
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1664:
1653:
1650:
1648:
1645:
1643:
1640:
1638:
1635:
1633:
1630:
1628:
1625:
1623:
1620:
1618:
1615:
1613:
1610:
1608:
1605:
1603:
1600:
1598:
1595:
1594:
1592:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1555:
1553:
1545:
1543:
1542:
1537:
1532:
1531:
1520:
1516:
1513:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1500:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1476:
1471:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1441:
1435:
1433:
1432:
1427:
1422:
1421:
1410:
1406:
1403:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1390:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1366:
1361:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1321:
1315:
1313:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1293:Former editor
1292:
1290:
1289:
1284:
1279:
1278:
1267:
1263:
1260:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1247:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1223:
1218:
1214:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1168:
1162:
1160:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1140:
1127:
1123:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1109:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1098:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1083:
1078:
1073:
1072:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1060:Guillaume2303
1057:
1056:
1055:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1018:Guillaume2303
1014:
1013:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
995:
994:
993:
988:
984:
980:
976:
972:
967:
963:
959:
955:
951:
947:
943:
939:
935:
931:
927:
923:
919:
915:
911:
907:
903:
899:
895:
891:
887:
882:
878:
874:
870:
869:
866:
862:
858:
857:Guillaume2303
853:
849:
845:
841:
837:
836:
835:
831:
827:
822:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
812:
808:
804:
803:Guillaume2303
800:
796:
792:
788:
784:
783:
778:
777:
772:
768:
760:
758:
757:
753:
749:
745:
744:. Thank you.
743:
739:
733:
731:
727:
723:
720:Please go to
718:
716:
712:
708:
704:
700:
696:
695:
687:
680:
678:
677:
673:
669:
662:
654:
645:
642:
640:
634:
633:
632:
630:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
606:
602:
598:
594:
590:
587:
584:
580:
575:
574:
571:
566:
563:
561:
557:
552:
550:
546:
538:
534:
530:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
510:
509:
508:
505:
497:Article title
496:
481:
477:
471:
468:
467:
464:
451:United States
445:
442:
440:
437:
435:
432:
430:
429:
425:
423:
420:
419:
416:
412:
411:
403:
392:
390:
387:
383:
382:
378:
372:
371:United States
369:
366:
362:
349:
348:
347:
340:
336:
332:
326:
323:
322:
319:
302:
298:
294:
293:
288:
285:
281:
280:
276:
270:
267:
264:
260:
247:
243:
237:
234:
233:
230:
213:
209:
205:
204:
196:
185:
183:
180:
176:
175:
171:
165:
162:
159:
155:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1556:
1549:
1527:
1524:
1499:source check
1478:
1472:
1469:
1442:
1439:
1417:
1414:
1389:source check
1368:
1362:
1359:
1322:
1319:
1296:
1274:
1271:
1246:source check
1225:
1219:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1196:
1169:
1166:
1143:— Preceding
1138:
1135:
1110:
1095:
1076:
1053:
998:
966:WP:DIRECTORY
930:New Republic
893:
889:
884:
880:
876:
872:
851:
847:
843:
820:
798:
794:
790:
786:
781:
774:
764:
746:
734:
719:
706:
692:
691:
660:
652:
649:
638:
624:
621:anti-Zionist
617:anti-Semitic
601:conservative
599:who became "
576:
567:
564:
559:
555:
553:
548:
544:
542:
500:
475:
439:Project Talk
427:
408:
344:
343:
330:
290:
241:
217:Conservatism
208:conservatism
201:
164:Conservatism
136:
96:
40:WikiProjects
1213:Sourcecheck
948:for proof)
795:independent
663:stepped in.
631:, what is?
629:publication
1591:Categories
1536:Report bug
1426:Report bug
1299:Gary Rosen
1283:Report bug
938:The Nation
881:Commentary
873:Commentary
848:Commentary
625:Commentary
560:Commentary
556:Commentary
549:Commentary
545:Commentary
522:JamesMLane
1519:this tool
1512:this tool
1409:this tool
1402:this tool
1266:this tool
1259:this tool
1080:obvious).
898:Collier's
771:synthesis
603:" in the
570:Lance6968
306:Magazines
297:magazines
269:Magazines
1525:Cheers.—
1415:Cheers.—
1303:Uncle Ed
1272:Cheers.—
1145:unsigned
1122:contribs
979:contribs
971:Headbomb
890:NY Times
838:Please,
715:fair use
699:fair use
653:Le Point
613:New Left
597:leftists
1552:removed
1449:my edit
1329:my edit
1199:checked
1176:my edit
1111:Comment
1033:Rjensen
1003:Rjensen
983:physics
950:Rjensen
826:Rjensen
661:villain
586:editors
478:on the
333:on the
244:on the
139:on the
112:Judaism
103:Judaism
59:Judaism
30:C-class
1207:failed
944:, and
906:Granta
444:Alerts
36:scale.
1102:talk
987:books
886:(17)"
639:Meowy
605:1970s
1578:talk
1563:talk
1307:talk
1203:true
1153:talk
1139:more
1119:talk
1064:talk
1037:talk
1022:talk
1007:talk
975:talk
954:talk
861:talk
830:talk
807:talk
789:are
782:Time
752:talk
707:this
672:talk
619:and
615:was
609:Jews
591:and
342:See
236:High
1493:RfC
1463:to
1383:RfC
1353:to
1343:to
1240:RfC
1217:).
1205:or
1190:to
1097:DGG
1077:all
852:are
844:not
787:shy
779:or
516:to
470:Low
325:Low
131:Low
1593::
1580:)
1565:)
1550:I
1506:.
1501:}}
1497:{{
1396:.
1391:}}
1387:{{
1309:)
1253:.
1248:}}
1244:{{
1215:}}
1211:{{
1155:)
1124:)
1115:SD
1104:)
1066:)
1039:)
1024:)
1009:)
985:/
981:/
977:/
956:)
940:,
936:,
932:,
928:,
924:,
920:,
916:,
912:,
908:,
904:,
900:,
863:)
832:)
809:)
799:to
754:)
717:.
674:)
655:.
568:--
520:.
502:--
1576:(
1561:(
1538:)
1534:(
1521:.
1514:.
1428:)
1424:(
1411:.
1404:.
1305:(
1285:)
1281:(
1268:.
1261:.
1151:(
1117:(
1100:(
1062:(
1035:(
1020:(
1005:(
997:"
989:}
973:{
952:(
859:(
828:(
805:(
769:/
750:(
670:(
529:c
526:t
482:.
337:.
248:.
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
