320:
operation. But this is still not conveying (a) greater diversity of fields where the term is used, such as software development, or (b) the flexibility of range of how conceptual or how operational it is, according to the target audience and need. The OV-1 for example can be a storyboard showig a sequence of specific cartoon figures or it can be a mod art item or anywhere in between. To address this would seem prohibitive -- "Concept of
Operations" is suitably descriptive as is, while it would take another section to the article to discuss that "It varies", and a section with subsections to ping places where the CONOP is applied, plus more reference or web sites to examples.
245:
340:
defined in those standards looked at the operation of a system or group of system from the organisational perspective rather than the user perspective. In general industry, there appears to be a significant amount of confusion regarding the difference between a ConOps and an OpsCon. The article should be updated to align with the standards it references or discuss the naming confusing in more detail.--
33:
130:
191:
180:
158:
88:
64:
202:
169:
339:
This article references IEEE standards for the development of a ConOps. The standards referenced are superseded. The current version of the appropriate standards refers to the type of document described in this article as a ″System
Operational Concept″ or OpsCon. The Concept of Operations (ConOps) as
319:
The phrase "Concept of
Operations" is a bit more generically in use. Besides the content about system design, I added mention of the military operations DoD definition and meaning, and sidenote that CONOPs then is a source or something summarized in acquiring a system for use in a military
252:
74:
277:
The article content was describing the term "Concept of
Operations" as system characteristics in system design. Yet scope is shown as in Military History, with categories of military hisory and military science and technology. The content does not seem to fit all of
387:
392:
143:
100:
129:
382:
95:
69:
104:
359:
Help me settle a debate I am having with some NASA colleagues, why would the spelling variation ConOps be preferred over con ops? --
44:
50:
32:
99:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
301:
287:
325:
295:
321:
291:
345:
364:
283:
279:
17:
341:
376:
360:
368:
349:
329:
305:
244:
87:
63:
26:
388:
Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
393:
Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
243:
128:
141:
This article has been checked against the following
253:
Military science, technology, and theory task force
226:
140:
8:
113:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
30:
290:or to even fit any one of them very well.
223:
137:
58:
93:This article is within the scope of the
60:
103:. To use this banner, please see the
383:Start-Class military history articles
116:Template:WikiProject Military history
7:
49:It is of interest to the following
25:
315:Greater diverity and flexibility
200:
189:
178:
167:
156:
86:
62:
31:
1:
96:Military history WikiProject
330:21:37, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
306:20:41, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
409:
350:08:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
335:System Operational Concept
161:Referencing and citation:
18:Talk:Concept of Operations
369:21:31, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
251:
222:
119:military history articles
81:
57:
227:Associated task forces:
172:Coverage and accuracy:
248:
205:Supporting materials:
133:
39:This article is rated
247:
132:
43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
288:Military Technology
194:Grammar and style:
147:for B-class status:
249:
134:
101:list of open tasks
45:content assessment
273:Mis-Categorized ?
270:
269:
266:
265:
262:
261:
258:
257:
218:
217:
207:criterion not met
174:criterion not met
105:full instructions
16:(Redirected from
400:
308:
284:Military Science
280:Military history
234:
224:
208:
204:
203:
197:
193:
192:
186:
182:
181:
175:
171:
170:
164:
160:
159:
138:
121:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:Military history
90:
83:
82:
77:
70:Military history
66:
59:
42:
36:
35:
27:
21:
408:
407:
403:
402:
401:
399:
398:
397:
373:
372:
357:
337:
317:
299:
275:
232:
206:
201:
195:
190:
184:
179:
173:
168:
162:
157:
118:
115:
112:
109:
108:
72:
40:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
406:
404:
396:
395:
390:
385:
375:
374:
356:
353:
336:
333:
316:
313:
311:
304:comment added
274:
271:
268:
267:
264:
263:
260:
259:
256:
255:
250:
240:
239:
237:
235:
229:
228:
220:
219:
216:
215:
213:
211:
210:
209:
198:
187:
176:
165:
151:
150:
148:
135:
125:
124:
122:
91:
79:
78:
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
405:
394:
391:
389:
386:
384:
381:
380:
378:
371:
370:
366:
362:
354:
352:
351:
347:
343:
334:
332:
331:
327:
323:
314:
312:
309:
307:
303:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
272:
254:
246:
242:
241:
238:
236:
231:
230:
225:
221:
214:
212:
199:
196:criterion met
188:
185:criterion met
177:
166:
163:criterion met
155:
154:
153:
152:
149:
146:
145:
139:
136:
131:
127:
126:
123:
106:
102:
98:
97:
92:
89:
85:
84:
80:
76:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
34:
29:
28:
19:
358:
355:Abbreviation
338:
318:
310:
276:
142:
94:
51:WikiProjects
322:Markbassett
300:—Preceding
292:Markbassett
183:Structure:
41:Start-class
377:Categories
75:Technology
342:Spuzzdawg
144:criteria
361:Mav-Tek
302:undated
286:, and
47:scale.
365:talk
346:talk
326:talk
296:talk
298:)
379::
367:)
348:)
328:)
282:,
233:/
73::
363:(
344:(
324:(
294:(
107:.
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
