Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Copernic

Source đź“ť

74: 53: 84: 22: 253: 162: 200: 329:
24.200.96.227 (feb 21 2010) Copenic was quite popular software in the early 2Y's around here and gave much better results than Altavista and Google in that era, I think this article deserve to stay, but not as it is right now. How the product helped the early web and how it evolved over time should
385:
state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is
330:
be mentioned in depth. I agree than the current page look like an ad and should removed for that, but the subject itself should be allowed to come back later in a better version.
374:(exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by 215: 364:
from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting
140: 418: 130: 186: 423: 413: 106: 356:
At least one major contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus to have a
234:. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see 337: 315: 280: 357: 272: 264: 97: 58: 395: 33: 211: 391: 39: 21: 341: 333: 311: 319: 368: 105:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
83: 73: 52: 227: 189:
for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
299: 382: 89: 375: 407: 295: 252: 79: 231: 174: 102: 308:
The link kicks you back to the same page, can someone fix that?
399: 345: 323: 303: 247: 194: 156: 15: 279:
here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or
251: 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 276: 239: 235: 206: 182: 178: 169: 8: 19: 160: 47: 167:Text and/or other creative content from 294:I think the product catalog should go. 261:Individuals with a conflict of interest 49: 277:request corrections or suggest content 271:not to directly edit the article. See 7: 273:Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest 115:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Internet 95:This article is within the scope of 360:. Conflict-of-interest editors are 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 419:Low-importance Internet articles 267:the subject of the article, are 198: 82: 72: 51: 20: 135:This article has been rated as 378:are unlikely to be accepted. 1: 424:WikiProject Internet articles 414:Start-Class Internet articles 346:21:30, 21 February 2010 (UTC) 118:Template:WikiProject Internet 109:and see a list of open tasks. 376:independent reliable sources 324:17:59, 7 October 2009 (UTC) 440: 381:Please also note that our 141:project's importance scale 304:21:19, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 238:; for its talk page, see 173:was copied or moved into 134: 67: 46: 400:13:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC) 390:to disclose that fact. 283:if the issue is urgent. 256: 28:This article is rated 392:Justlettersandnumbers 263:, particularly those 255: 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 362:strongly discouraged 358:conflict of interest 352:Conflict of interest 226:. Its contents were 222:with a consensus to 181:. The former page's 98:WikiProject Internet 187:provide attribution 257: 210:was nominated for 34:content assessment 336:comment added by 314:comment added by 287: 286: 246: 245: 193: 192: 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 121:Internet articles 431: 373: 367: 348: 326: 269:strongly advised 248: 202: 201: 195: 172: 164: 163: 157: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 439: 438: 434: 433: 432: 430: 429: 428: 404: 403: 371: 365: 354: 331: 309: 292: 290:Product catalog 199: 168: 161: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 90:Internet portal 88: 81: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 437: 435: 427: 426: 421: 416: 406: 405: 353: 350: 291: 288: 285: 284: 258: 244: 243: 220:14 August 2009 218:was closed on 216:The discussion 207:Copernic Agent 203: 191: 190: 185:now serves to 170:Copernic Agent 165: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 137:Low-importance 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 62:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 436: 425: 422: 420: 417: 415: 412: 411: 409: 402: 401: 397: 393: 389: 384: 379: 377: 370: 363: 359: 351: 349: 347: 343: 339: 338:24.200.96.227 335: 327: 325: 321: 317: 313: 306: 305: 301: 297: 289: 282: 278: 274: 270: 266: 262: 259: 254: 250: 249: 241: 237: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 208: 204: 197: 196: 188: 184: 180: 176: 171: 166: 159: 158: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 387: 383:Terms of Use 380: 369:request edit 361: 355: 328: 316:151.151.7.51 307: 293: 268: 265:representing 260: 223: 219: 205: 136: 96: 40:WikiProjects 332:—Preceding 310:—Preceding 236:its history 30:Start-class 408:Categories 281:contact us 275:. You may 179:this edit 388:required 334:unsigned 312:unsigned 232:Copernic 212:deletion 175:Copernic 112:Internet 103:Internet 59:Internet 183:history 139:on the 296:Rees11 228:merged 36:scale. 230:into 224:merge 177:with 396:talk 342:talk 320:talk 300:talk 240:here 214:. 131:Low 410:: 398:) 372:}} 366:{{ 344:) 322:) 302:) 394:( 340:( 318:( 298:( 242:. 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Internet
WikiProject icon
icon
Internet portal
WikiProject Internet
Internet
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
Copernic Agent
Copernic
this edit
history
provide attribution
Copernic Agent
deletion
The discussion
merged
Copernic
its history
here

representing
Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest
request corrections or suggest content
contact us

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑