943:
and draw another line, well, then you have two lines. In some countries the definition of a line is strictly adhered to such as for tramlines in
Belgium. In England, however, subway track systems are called lines. For example, the Picadilly Line is similar to the Canada Line. The Line in Canada Line or RAV Line also refers to a track system. Such usage is regrettable as it undermines the usefulness of the word line to mean a single route from point A to point B. The term Canada Line now has little meaning other han a brand as dicussed above. It must now be supplemented by the statement Airport or Richmond. However, in their presence, the Canada Line term become unnecessary; it no longer carries any useful information. It may make more sense to just number lines 1,2,3 and state their destination, such as 2, to Airport via Bridgeport. The number is a convenient way to address the line. Such as take the No.2, or take Line 2. The misuse of the term line complicated the description of the Canada Line in the article, such as when describing its length. The length of the track system is only relevant to reveal the scale of the construction project but does little to convey the contribution it makes to the transportation network.
1572:
Electric, I had found a profile of a project manager who was responsible for testing and installation of electrical components, including propulsion and HVAC systems. The rationale for updating to
Mitsubishi is that there at least is some documentation that can be verified, even if it is a LinkedIn profile for a project manager. After all, a project manager for Mitsubishi would not be installing Bombardier systems when Bombardier was not permitted to bid on the Canada Line itself. If the article were to revert back to listing Bombardier MITRAC, there needs to be solid evidence presented with weblinks. Prior to my update and revert, there was nothing listed that can be viewed.
703:, the particular train system used by the current SkyTrain line; the FAQ is merely addressing the fact that the Canada Line is based on different (and incompatible) technology. That doesn't mean that TransLink couldn't operate both systems as ‘SkyTrain’ if they wanted – ‘Toronto subway/RT’, ‘London Underground’, ‘Paris Métro’, and ‘Berlin U-Bahn’ all encompass two or more incompatible systems. The FAQ doesn’t address the issue of branding, and the decision wouldn’t be the City of Vancouver’s to make either way.
1045:
videos of tours of Canada Line, and on one of them, the guide mentioned that
Capstan Way is one of the locations for a future station. Even if Capstan Way is completely canceled, it doesn't mean all reference to it should be removed; a paragraph of explanation would be more helpful. I'm re-adding Capstan Way Station as proposed. If anyone believes it has been completely canceled, please add information to that effect (with references), rather than removing information. Thanks!
1283:
31:
985:
Canada Line as two separate routes with shared track, but the reverse choice made much more sense: the common section is not only much longer than the southern branches, but will also carry the majority of passengers. This way, the burden of distinguishing between the two types of southbound trains is borne by the smaller number of people using the branches, rather than the larger number using the main line.
1667:
574:"; SkyTrain is Translink's branding for its rapid transit. In theory, there's nothing stopping Translink from branding all its rapid transit lines as "SkyTrain" (and even using the same branding for the light rail Evergreen Line). I have no idea one way or the other, but unless Translink has issued some definitive edict on the subject, I don't think we should make this claim. --
2027:
1922:
1592:
and cannot be used in this case. Their is no way to verify this person's claims (and further more they never explicitly state that the motor were
Mitsubishi, simply that he worked on them. This could have been in a previous job, or even under contract). The way forward here is to simply remove the
1423:
The first complaint is that the stations are built so that renovations would be required in order to run longer trains than are being used initially. This isn’t unprecedented (Copenhagen's beautiful new metro did the same thing), nor is it too large problem, since automated operation makes it just as
1044:
I've noticed that on several occasions, references to
Capstan Way Station have been removed. Although the nearby development project was canceled, and therefore the station won't be built according to the original timeline, it doesn't mean it won't be built in the future. I've seen recent (July 2009)
806:
There’s no particular reason why ‘SkyTrain’ has to be synonymous with ART (the
Bangkok Skytrain isn't ART), and in fact the City of Vancouver are being mildly confusing by using it in such a manner (notice that they refer to SkyTrain as a ‘technology’ rather than a system). Remember, though, that the
1539:
I could see the Canada Line being expanded to either Ladner or
Tsawwassen, but it will take a lot of growth for the expansion to happen. It's likely the line will head down to Steveston via the Railway ROW. A light rail line to Tsawwassen is more likely in my opinion and it should use the old Massey
1370:
has a guy saying that the stations are too short and will be hard to upgrade (he also says that it is "single track" for a portion, I guess he's talking about the stacked part). Is this legitimate criticism? Will 100,000 people a day be reasonable, and what happens if ridership grows beyond that?
1179:
I'm pretty sure that cut and cover was used from 64th Avenue until the
Olympic Village station. From there on until Waterfront, it's bored. If you check the videos on Youtube, you can find the downtown portion of the tunnel is circular while the portion down Cambie are square. I'm very sure that the
1011:
Vancouver-Richmond line as the main line, with the airport being treated as a branch line. Their rationale for this is based on their expectation that the majority of travel will be on the main line, with significantly less traffic on the airport run. (I've added a reference to this effect; it makes
946:
ps.As far as branding is concerned as discussed above why don't people just call the system the
Vancouver Metro Light Rail Network, line 1, Line 2, etc. Unlike the term Skytrain this can easily include surface LRT. Even more general: the Intercity Rapid Transit Network including the above light rail
565:
The Canada Line, formerly known as the
Richmond-Airport-Vancouver Line ("RAV Line"), is a new rapid transit line of the Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority (TransLink) currently under construction. The line will be the third in Greater Vancouver, Canada and will be added to the existing rapid
1482:
I'd say it's pretty unlikely that such an extension would be made in the next few decades, because the population density along any likely route probably isn't high enough to justify rapid transit. As for any studies, the GVRD periodically carries out studies of overall transit service for parts of
964:
If you're from Vancouver (like me, Ckatz, and Emarsee), you would know that the Canada Line is just one line, not two. Yes, drawing a line, lifting the pencil, and drawing another one connecting to the original is two lines, but it could be branded in one line, which it is. Also, this is Vancouver,
352:
Something doesn't add up here... "There have been recent complaints about the location of the Broadway-City Hall station. Critics say that it is not close enough to Broadway and it is too far _north_ on Cambie St. Officials have taken this complaint seriously and they are debating whether or not to
1754:
The new line will have its own yard, and I don't believe there will even be (initially, at least) a connection between it and the Expo Line. Both fleets are built for standard-guage tracks, so combining the two segments in future would be more practicable than with Toronto's 'subway' lines and the
1571:
I ended up changing the electrical components listed from Bombardier to Mitsubishi Electric. The reason is that there is no solid information available anywhere from Bombardier themselves and also have not been able to find any information from an independent site stating this. As for Mitsubishi
984:
been any expectation that a railway line consist only of a single route. Most metro systems employ some sort of branching: London, as you note (but for some reason complain about) has many branches, Stockholm's three lines take in eight routes, and so on. TransLink could have chosen to present the
942:
There has been some discussion regarding the meaning of the word "line". The most basic geometric definition of a line is a just that: a line, such as a straight line, or a curved line. A line is formed by drawing a pencil accross a piece of paper without lifting the pencil. If you lift the pencil
767:
The reason "SkyTrain" is a generic term synonymous with Bombardier ART is because the trains (and the system on which they run) are branded as such. Now if there indeed is a change in branding (i.e. Canada Line added to the SkyTrain branding), it no longer makes sense for SkyTrain to be synonymous
1791:
I posted a fairly large amount of information about an incident that happened at Olympic Village Station on August 13, 2015 and a majority got deleted. The majority was comments from reddit speculating as to what happened and I clearly marked it as from social media to let people know that it was
896:
According to the Canada Line Office the line is 18.428 kilometers long excluding the OMC. According to my best measurements and calculations Waterfront to Bridgeport is 11.1 kilometers. The track splits at Bridgeport station, with one track going to YVR being 3.9 kilometers and the track going to
1401:
Considering that there were 85,000 boardings on a Sunday, I would say that it is well on it's way to 100,000 well before 2013. There are people complaining that platforms and trains are too short, but most of them are forum posts and not reliable sources like the CBC. I would say that the single
1386:
The single tracking occurs on the last few hundred metres of line at both YVR and in Richmond. It will only become an issue if and when the line is extended further into Richmond (which is probably some way off). As for ridership, the more common criticism is that it will be well below 100,000,
1606:
I think this is probably the best way to go at this point in just listing that it uses AC propulsion. I did look at Rotem's website and it didn't list the actual manufacturer. Even though I think that a project manager would most likely not make up a project that was worked on in my opinion,
1427:
With that in mind, the single track is a more unusual choice, and presents a slightly larger potential problem. Even before extensions become an issue (trams might be a better option for Richmond anyway), the main issue is that neither southern terminus can accommodate an incoming train and an
1428:
outgoing one at the same time, putting a cap on the possible frequencies. Theoretically, it could eventually be necessary for some trains to terminate at Bridgeport in order to provide sufficient capacity on the Vancouver section, but I don’t think it’s likely to be a problem any time soon.
1635:. I hope these facts can remain, but we have to come up with a way to cite them so future readers can verify the facts. Note that the instructions are not easy (I have been unable to verify), but I don't know if this really matters. Another editor noted that the figures may be from a
1693:; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Knowledge (XXG). This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
1067:. Basically without the development at Capstan Way, there would be no station since the developers would've paid $ 15 million to fund the station. There is no way they would build this station now since the area is non-residential and without the project, this station is dead.
155:
proposal for a fully automated, grade-separated system be accepted. This 'Best and Final Offer' bid was $ 343 million dollars over the approved budget. However, through various cost trimming measures the bid price has since been reduced to within $ 106 million of the approved
128:
the TransLink Board approved the RAV line 8-4 owing to Vancouver city councillor Raymond Louie and North Vancouver mayor Barbara Sharp having changed their votes conditional on maintaining the right to cancel the project if none of the bids meet the approved budget of $ 1.35
74:
To simplify the timeline I removed some of the following things about the inability of Translink to come to a decision. I don't think it is really relevant any more now that the project has been approved. However, I will leave it here for the entertainment of our readers:
741:
is that "SkyTrain" represents the SkyTrain system (and branding), not the Bombardier ART trains or technology. But if the term "SkyTrain" in the FAQ did stand for the ART technology as you argued, it will still indicate that Canada Line is not branded as SkyTrain. Here's
768:
with ART. Doing so would be the same as saying "Canada Line is branded as SkyTrain, but it is not SkyTrain (Bombardier ART)", which does not make sense and is confusing. In other words, doing so (as you argued) implies that Canada Line is not branded as SkyTrain. --
1755:
Scarborough RT, but I don't know whether the train-control systems will be compatible in such a way as to allow ART and ROTEM vehicles to run on the same line. Certainly it's unlikely that the Canada Line will have the induction plate that the ART trains require.
1344:
Thanks, I'll find a fix for the coming revision. The opening of the Canada Line (along with the prospect of Millennium Line extensions) has made an increase in geographic accuracy necessary, and this always produces complications in the city-centre loop.
897:
Richmond Center being 3.4 kilometers. This puts the total non-OMC track length at 18.4 kilometers. Since these numbers are not from published sources (ie.original research) I will just leave them in the discussion page. The length of the two "lines" is:
1244:
I drove Cambie often. The pavement from KingEd south for about 2 blocks was intact on both sides. On the east side, they stored equipment atop the old pavement. Traffic flowed on the west side. You can see the pavement in the photo you indicated.
876:
belongs to BC Transit (which operated the public transit in Vancouver at the time of SkyTrain's launch). Of course, BC Transit & TransLink may have entered into agreements that limit their use of these; anyone know anything about that?
1768:
No, they are not. The original Skytrain cars use linear induction motors. The Canada Line cars are standard electric motor drive. You can see that the distance from the platform to the track is greater on the Canada Line that Skytrain.
1141:
Some parts of Cambie (south of King Ed) were built by boring, weren't they? I do not recall any cut & cover from King Ed to 33rd - even when only one side of median was open, the road on the east side was the original, as I recall
422:
The photographs are licensed under Creative Commons, so you can upload a low-resolution version from my blog to wikipedia, or let me know which one you think is best, and I'll upload a higher resolution version from my source images.
1229:. The link has a picture (poor resolution - sorry!) showing construction south of King Edward, and the road appears to be dug up. The second page also indicates that the east side of Cambie was reopened to traffic in November 2007.
1180:
Queen Elizabeth Park section wasn't bored and it was indeed cut and cover. I believe Bombardier's plan for boring would've bored straight through the bend on Cambie, but SNC-Lavalin's plan called for cut and cover along the bend.
589:
Sorry, I should clarify that what I'm looking for evidence of is the fact that the Canada Line won't be branded as a SkyTrain line. It's well documented that it will be built with a different technology from the existing lines.
1587:
Your are indeed correct that Bombardier does not mention that they are the motor supplier, but at the same time there are no solid sources that say Mitsubishi is either. The simple fact of the matter is that Linkedin is not a
1307:
The System Map places Vancouver City Center, North of granville station, when in reality it is south of it. While the map is topologically correct, I believe that it is heavily misleading since some geographical accuracy is
1522:
I'd love to see the Canada Line extended to the Tsawwassen Ferry Terminal. When the George Massey Tunnel gets twinned, an extra tube should be added to accommodate a future extension of the Canada Line into Delta. --
1477:
It looks to me like a 15 – 20 kilometer extension south could take the Canada Line to the ferry terminal at Tsawwassen. Has there been any suggestion that this might be done some day, any study of the feasability?
992:
separate from other services, just as the London Underground, Paris Métro, Stockholm T-Bana, Berlin U-Bahn, etc. etc. are separate from the bus and tram systems in those cities. Why shouldn't it have its own name?
1402:
track is a valid complaint as there is a very good chance that the Canada Line is going to be extended further into Richmond in the future, but it's not a valid complaint for the YVR line as it has nowhere to go.
393:
Several trains are apparently now sitting in plain view in the yard at Bridgeport station — can anyone get a good photograph of one of them to replace the artist’s image that appears in the article at the moment?
1387:
since, under the terms of the P3, Translink would then have to compensate the private partner. Is it legitimate criticism? Possibly, but only in the relatively long term, and only assuming growth in ridership.
965:
not Belgium, not England. This is a fact. The system is SkyTrain, the line is Canada Line. My suggestion is to use "the Airport route" and the "Richmond-Brighouse route", since, like I said, it is one line. --
1160:
The cut-and-cover construction will be used: Along Granville Street from north of Pender Street to Hastings Street in downtown Vancouver, and along Cambie Street from 2nd Avenue to 64th Avenue (Tunnel Portal
608:
An anonymous IP address just edited this to say that the RAV line will definitively not use the SkyTrain branding. While it's obviously possible and even seems likely, it would be nice to have a citation.
167:
the City of Richmond has stated that they would oppose any elevated line along Number 3 Road as is proposed in the recommended bid. They would like to see the line moved to Minoru Boulevard, or built at
1260:
It could be that that section of Cambie was used for transitioning from the twinned cut and cover tunnel to a stacked cut and cover tunnel. AFAIK, King Ed is the only stacked station on the Canada Line.
292:
Additionaly, Robson is now "Vancouver City Centre" and there are only going to be 3 YVR stations, one of them being Airport Terminal and one of them Templeton. Cambie has also been renamed Aberdeen.
1114:
I believe I've seen that map ever since 2005ish, the maps on the trains itself do not list any of the future stations, and Capstan is defiantly cancelled until the land adjacent to it is developed.
1494:
I can see it extending into West Richmond though. I live there, and for every house they knock down, they build two or three -- in many places, the population density rivals East Vancouver's. -→
1593:
material all together and keep it removed until a reliable source (official release, news article, etc.) can be found that explicitly mentions what motors are used. I have also posted on the
510:
I don’t know the exact rationale behind the name ‘Canada Line’, but ‘Richmond–Airport–Vancouver’ was never intended to be anything more than a descriptive term to use while planning the line.
521:
The current text of the article claims that the name change was a condition of funding. Is there anything to support that? The press release cited there doesn't say anything about it.
318:
Can anyone provide a source for the assertion that serious consideration was given to calling it the ‘Olympic Line’ (since TransLink have been so careful to stress that this is
353:
move the station _north_ 50 metres, so it will be closer to Broadway"... If I had to hazard a guess, I'd say that the proposed site is too far _south_ judging by this document
873:
869:
1323:
Yeah, I noticed that too. Both the route diagram and the my Canada Line are correct. I think you should bring it up with DavidArthur, the creator of the SkyTrain system map.
1285:
You can see the stacked tunnels there, and a cut to the surface above them. Perhaps, because of the stacking, the line was narrow enough that pavement could be left intact?
570:
Is there any documentary evidence of this? It's fully possible, of course. But Bombardier's branding for the technology behind the existing SkyTrain system is actually "
2131:
2127:
2113:
284:
I like the map on the front page but thought I'd note here that the 'False Creek South' station is missing and the 'Davie' Station is called 'Yaletown' apparently. --
566:
transit system but will not use linear induction motor technology. Thus it will not be branded "SkyTrain" and the system will simply be branded the Canada Line.
1992:
1640:
1632:
1367:
1744:
Does anyone know if the new vehicles will be compatible with the existing SkyTrain lines? Will a new vehicle yard need to be built for them? --
502:
Just wondering if anyone read anything about why the name was changed from RAV to Canada Line. To me, RAV or Olympic Line make the most sense! --
1879:
1639:
and, thus, not as good as if the information was reported by a reliable Secondary Source. Anyways, the discussion is probably best centralized
853:
Oh thank God. Having it as a separate brand seemed like pathetic pettiness ("Oh, it's not SkyTrain, it's a different motor", like people care).
140:
the TransLink Board announced that the RAV Line could be scrapped due to cost overruns if they don't settle the issue by the end of November.
99:
1594:
807:
City are not the ones to build, operate, or name the Canada Line; that's handled by TransLink, a regional agency not under their control.
737:
David, I have no problem with a system encompassing two or more incompatible systems, as I know of a few myself. My interpretation of the
1770:
1099:
1211:
All that maks sense - but how did they keep so much of the old blacktop intact - on both sides of the street - from King Ed to 29th? --
1628:
669:
on the City of Vancouver Rapid Transit Office site. In the answer for question six, it reads: "The Canada Line is not SkyTrain..." --
2109:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
2099:
700:
571:
266:
1431:
In the mean time, these various compromises have enabled Vancouver to get a metro line for substantially less than the going rate.
1726:
1090:
1811:
834:
An update: though we can't be certain until launch, it's starting to look like this will indeed be officially a SkyTrain line.
1631:. The facts are not currently cited, but instructions to verify have been offered by the contributor. Discussion is here:
838:
is now referring to that Canada Line as 'SkyTrain's newest line', and comparing its rolling stock to 'other SkyTrain cars'.
1424:
cheap to increase frequencies as to lengthen trains. And higher frequencies present a greater benefit to passengers anyway.
412:
205:
1673:
417:
2174:
2064:
1061:
1722:
1022:
641:
103:
1832:
1993:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070217112255/http://www.canadaline.ca/files/docs/BusinessIsOpenReleaseMarch202006.pdf
38:
1889:
370:
I've posted online a collection of Creative Commons licensed photograph of the construction of the Canada Line at
322:
an Olympic project), let alone that there was ever any intention to use the name ‘RAV’ when it went into service?
1899:
1508:
1483:
the regional district, so presumably there is a study covering Delta and Tsawwassen. Try the GVRD website maybe?
539:
I've never seen that claim anywhere other than here – I was meaning to add a citation needed tag to that myself.
2130:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1880:
https://web.archive.org/20090807065913/http://www.vancouversun.com:80/Canada%20Line%20open/1859013/story.html
1774:
1103:
221:
I added a link to canadaline I assumed it was a website built by the Fed/Prov. Gov't I hope this is correct.
2165:
2091:
2055:
1984:
479:
1996:
1799:
1095:
254:
193:
190:
a smaller crane will be used to the cut-and-cover which will increase the disruption time for four months.
1828:
954:
928:
468:
1502:
102:
reported his desire to revitalize the RAV as well as the NorthEast extension of the Millennium Line into
2149:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2137:
2039:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1954:
1934:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1436:
1350:
998:
858:
843:
812:
738:
708:
544:
487:
446:
438:
399:
262:
233:
2090:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1983:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1827:. Speculation is also not reliable. Clearly marking unreliable content does not permit it to be added.
950:
924:
357:
152:
2017:
1612:
1608:
1607:
removing the info at this point is the best way going forward. I think all of us can agree on that.
1577:
1573:
1528:
1495:
1455:
The seating figure in the train specs doesn't mention the actual number of seats. Anyone have this?
1376:
1064:
1636:
1807:
1598:
1392:
1290:
1234:
1169:
947:
network, as well as any Rapid Bus and Express Bus services, connecting the regional town centers.
769:
670:
1883:
337:
2100:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090304224720/http://www.canadaline.ca/files/uploads/docs/doc177.pdf
1460:
1309:
1050:
882:
773:
674:
665:
The fact that the Canada Line will not be branded as a SkyTrain line is explicitly stated in the
526:
87:
the TransLink Board voted 7-5 not to proceed work on the RAV line due to projected cost overruns.
2134:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
631:
Agreed that it is likely, but unproven; I've removed it for now until we can find a citation. --
2150:
2040:
1935:
666:
1861:
1677:
1549:
1411:
1332:
1270:
1189:
1123:
1076:
464:
201:
1698:
1950:
1756:
1432:
1346:
1313:
1250:
1216:
1147:
1012:
sense when you consider that YVR is funding part of the costs for the airport extension.) --
994:
854:
839:
808:
704:
540:
511:
483:
442:
428:
395:
379:
323:
258:
243:
229:
47:
17:
2157:
2047:
1942:
1705:
1627:
There are new ridership numbers in the info boxes for most stations now. Thank you to the
1869:
1525:
1372:
1020:
639:
614:
595:
579:
503:
293:
285:
2103:
1824:
1589:
1227:
835:
2191:
354:
2116:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1803:
1648:
1484:
1388:
1286:
1230:
1165:
413:
http://canadalinephotos.blogspot.com/2008/01/2008-01-18-operations-and-maintenance.html
2156:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2123:
2046:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1941:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1456:
1046:
878:
522:
418:
http://canadalinephotos.blogspot.com/2007/12/2007-12-14-train-unveiling-ceremony.html
1156:
There's no mention of boring being used there on the Canada Line construction site.
409:
Here are some photographs of the trains in the yard and from the unveiling ceremony:
1701:
then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (XXG) (Commons does not allow fair use)
1543:
1405:
1326:
1264:
1183:
1117:
1070:
197:
183:
1794:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Olympic_Village_Station&oldid=677466992
912:
W-0.7-C-1.0-Y-1.0-O-0.5-B-1.5-K-1.9-O-0.7-L-1.9-M-1.9-B-1.6-A-1.0-L-0.8-R= 14.5 km
904:
W-0.7-C-1.0-Y-1.0-O-0.5-B-1.5-K-1.9-O-0.7-L-1.9-M-1.9-B-1.5-T-0.9-S-1.5-Y= 15.0 km
901:
W-0.7-C-1.0-Y-1.0-O-0.5-B-1.5-K-1.9-O-0.7-L-1.9-M-1.9-B-1.6-A-1.0-L-0.8-R= 14.5 km
2179:
2083:
2069:
1976:
1962:
1851:
1836:
1815:
1778:
1759:
1748:
1730:
1652:
1616:
1601:
1581:
1556:
1534:
1513:
1487:
1464:
1440:
1418:
1396:
1380:
1354:
1339:
1317:
1294:
1277:
1254:
1246:
1238:
1220:
1212:
1196:
1173:
1151:
1143:
1130:
1107:
1083:
1054:
1029:
1002:
971:
958:
932:
886:
862:
847:
816:
777:
712:
678:
648:
618:
599:
583:
548:
530:
514:
491:
472:
450:
432:
424:
403:
383:
375:
360:
340:
326:
305:
302:
296:
270:
246:
236:
225:
209:
160:
144:
133:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1890:
https://web.archive.org/20060830013244/http://www.canadaline.ca:80/allFacts.asp
1712:
2122:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1900:
https://web.archive.org/20070203063053/http://www.canadaline.ca:80/aboutUs.asp
1745:
1666:
1014:
633:
610:
591:
575:
172:
1644:
179:
the TransLink board is scheduled to vote on the 'Best and Final Offer' bid.
478:
That map shows the Evergreen Line/Millennium Line Extension, which is now
371:
1997:
http://www.canadaline.ca/files/docs/BusinessIsOpenReleaseMarch202006.pdf
1866:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
1540:
Tunnel tubes. I would think a new bridge would be better than a tunnel.
463:
An IP has changed 2011 into year 2014. Is there any reason for this? --
333:
1903:
121:
110:
106:, stating that the provincial government would cover any cost overruns.
91:
2034:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
1929:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
1792:
from social media, namely reddit. Here is a link to the old revision:
1893:
1874:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
1643:, rather than here or in individual station article talk pages. --
699:
That source is using ‘SkyTrain’ as a generic term synonymous with
80:
1633:
Verification/calculation procedure for transit ridership numbers
187:
176:
164:
148:
137:
125:
114:
95:
84:
1884:
http://www.vancouversun.com/Canada+Line+open/1859013/story.html
25:
2002:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
1909:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
1089:
The map on Canada Line's website still says future though.
2094:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1987:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1711:
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try
1658:
File:BSicon uBS2lf-ELEV.svg Nominated for speedy Deletion
2087:
1980:
1855:
1850:
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
1793:
332:
This study made frequent use of the Olympic line label
2104:
http://www.canadaline.ca/files/uploads/docs/doc177.pdf
2192:
http://www.canadaline.ca/constructionMethodsCandC.asp
355:
http://www.canadaline.ca/files/uploads/docs/doc65.pdf
2126:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1704:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
1226:I'm not sure they did keep the original pavement.
908:or, if you prefer, the length of the main line is
482:, rather than 2011 as was previously indicated.
301:Updated copyrighted image with another one. --
2112:This message was posted before February 2018.
1597:talk page asking for help in finding a source.
1567:Change from Bombardier to Mitsubishi Electric
8:
1676:, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
667:Frequently Asked Questions, Canada Line page
374:that may be of interest for this article. --
2082:I have just modified one external link on
1975:I have just modified one external link on
1371:Should this be in the criticism section?
252:
191:
117:the RAV line was defeated again (6-6 tie).
1007:FYI, Translink/Canada Line describes the
2184:
1719:This notification is provided by a Bot
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
2014:to let others know (documentation at
372:http://canadalinephotos.blogspot.com/
334:http://www.marigni.com/vancouver.html
7:
1904:http://www.canadaline.ca/aboutUs.asp
1708:then it cannot be uploaded or used.
916:and the length of the spur line is
561:A recent edit added the following:
224:Is it time to move this article to
872:belongs to TransLink (SCBCTA) and
24:
2086:. Please take a moment to review
1979:. Please take a moment to review
1894:http://canadaline.ca/allFacts.asp
1854:. Please take a moment to review
572:Bombardier Advanced Rapid Transit
2025:
1920:
1665:
29:
1672:An image used in this article,
1473:Question about future extension
1465:06:03, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
988:As for the name, the SkyTrain
348:Location of Broadway/City Hall
1:
2070:22:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
1787:2015 Olympic Village incident
1731:00:37, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
1653:21:43, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
1557:02:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
1535:19:01, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
1514:19:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
1488:15:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
870:the Canada Line official mark
836:TransLink's official web site
515:21:10, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
506:7:37, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
451:16:00, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
433:02:43, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
384:06:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
361:05:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
288:7:56, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
247:00:20, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
237:15:10, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
1963:16:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
1760:18:05, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
1749:16:08, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
1617:03:09, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
817:19:17, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
778:14:52, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
713:14:10, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
679:11:46, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
404:19:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
341:00:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
271:16:23, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
210:02:35, 2 December 2004 (UTC)
1837:14:34, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
1816:01:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
1674:File:BSicon uBS2lf-ELEV.svg
1623:Verifying ridership numbers
1602:21:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
1582:18:42, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
1441:20:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
1419:17:26, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
1397:16:02, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
1381:14:56, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
1355:20:19, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
1340:01:50, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
1318:23:47, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
1295:10:31, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
1278:01:56, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
1255:01:53, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
1239:14:53, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
1221:18:19, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
1197:17:38, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
1174:09:55, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
1152:06:57, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
1131:17:36, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
1108:04:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
920:B-1.5-T-0.9-S-1.5-Y= 3.9 km
327:16:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
151:RAVCO recommended that the
2210:
2143:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2079:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1972:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1872:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
1847:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1713:Commons Undeletion Request
1680:for the following reason:
1084:00:56, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
1055:19:33, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
874:the SkyTrain official mark
863:17:07, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
848:16:18, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
649:03:55, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
619:20:44, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
549:20:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
531:23:01, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
314:‘Name of the line’ section
2180:00:02, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
1030:20:44, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
1003:20:13, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
972:06:52, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
959:06:09, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
933:20:06, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
600:19:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
584:19:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
492:17:16, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
473:15:42, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
1779:01:19, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
306:15:03, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
297:11:50, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
2075:External links modified
1968:External links modified
1843:External links modified
887:22:43, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
459:2014 instead of 2011 ??
1823:Social media is not a
1723:CommonsNotificationBot
1682:Other speedy deletions
366:Photos of Construction
1629:anonymous contributor
1060:I've found a source:
868:For what it's worth,
42:of past discussions.
2124:regular verification
1917:to let others know.
1858:. If necessary, add
2114:After February 2018
2006:parameter below to
1913:parameter below to
1040:Capstan Way Station
557:"SkyTrain" branding
2168:InternetArchiveBot
2119:InternetArchiveBot
2058:InternetArchiveBot
1706:fair use rationale
1595:WikiProject Trains
1282:One last picture.
1062:Planning to cancel
938:Definition of Line
2144:
1961:
1819:
1802:comment added by
1737:
1736:
1686:What should I do?
1678:Wikimedia Commons
1555:
1417:
1338:
1276:
1195:
1129:
1098:comment added by
1082:
1027:
646:
389:Photos of trains?
273:
257:comment added by
212:
196:comment added by
153:SNC-Lavalin/Serco
67:
66:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
2201:
2194:
2189:
2178:
2169:
2142:
2141:
2120:
2068:
2059:
2032:
2029:
2028:
2021:
1957:
1956:Talk to my owner
1952:
1927:
1924:
1923:
1873:
1865:
1818:
1796:
1697:If the image is
1669:
1662:
1661:
1554:
1552:
1546:
1541:
1533:
1511:
1505:
1500:
1416:
1414:
1408:
1403:
1337:
1335:
1329:
1324:
1275:
1273:
1267:
1262:
1205:You are correct.
1194:
1192:
1186:
1181:
1128:
1126:
1120:
1115:
1110:
1081:
1079:
1073:
1068:
1019:
970:
638:
480:planned for 2014
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
18:Talk:Canada Line
2209:
2208:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2200:
2199:
2198:
2197:
2190:
2186:
2172:
2167:
2135:
2128:have permission
2118:
2092:this simple FaQ
2077:
2062:
2057:
2030:
2026:
2015:
1985:this simple FaQ
1970:
1960:
1955:
1925:
1921:
1867:
1859:
1845:
1825:reliable source
1797:
1789:
1742:
1660:
1625:
1590:reliable source
1569:
1550:
1544:
1542:
1524:
1509:
1503:
1498:Buchanan-Hermit
1496:
1475:
1453:
1412:
1406:
1404:
1365:
1333:
1327:
1325:
1305:
1271:
1265:
1263:
1190:
1184:
1182:
1139:
1124:
1118:
1116:
1093:
1091:Canada Line Map
1077:
1071:
1069:
1042:
1025:
966:
940:
894:
644:
559:
500:
461:
391:
368:
350:
316:
282:
219:
100:Gordon Campbell
72:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2207:
2205:
2196:
2195:
2183:
2162:
2161:
2154:
2107:
2106:
2098:Added archive
2076:
2073:
2052:
2051:
2044:
2000:
1999:
1991:Added archive
1969:
1966:
1953:
1947:
1946:
1939:
1907:
1906:
1898:Added archive
1896:
1888:Added archive
1886:
1878:Added archive
1844:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1829:Walter Görlitz
1788:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1763:
1762:
1741:
1738:
1735:
1734:
1716:
1715:
1709:
1702:
1688:
1687:
1670:
1659:
1656:
1637:Primary Source
1624:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1604:
1568:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1517:
1516:
1491:
1490:
1474:
1471:
1469:
1452:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1429:
1425:
1364:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1304:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1242:
1241:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1200:
1199:
1138:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1087:
1086:
1041:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1023:
986:
975:
974:
939:
936:
922:
921:
914:
913:
906:
905:
902:
893:
892:Length of line
890:
866:
865:
832:
831:
830:
829:
828:
827:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
819:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
784:
783:
782:
781:
780:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
642:
624:
623:
622:
621:
603:
602:
558:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
534:
533:
518:
517:
499:
496:
495:
494:
460:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
437:Great! I like
420:
415:
410:
390:
387:
367:
364:
349:
346:
345:
344:
315:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
281:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
251:Done. - zero.
218:
215:
214:
213:
180:
169:
157:
141:
130:
118:
107:
88:
71:
68:
65:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2206:
2193:
2188:
2185:
2182:
2181:
2176:
2171:
2170:
2159:
2155:
2152:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2139:
2133:
2129:
2125:
2121:
2115:
2110:
2105:
2101:
2097:
2096:
2095:
2093:
2089:
2085:
2080:
2074:
2072:
2071:
2066:
2061:
2060:
2049:
2045:
2042:
2038:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2023:
2019:
2013:
2009:
2005:
1998:
1994:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1973:
1967:
1965:
1964:
1958:
1951:
1944:
1940:
1937:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1918:
1916:
1912:
1905:
1901:
1897:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1885:
1881:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1871:
1863:
1857:
1853:
1848:
1842:
1838:
1834:
1830:
1826:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1795:
1786:
1780:
1776:
1772:
1771:204.244.110.7
1767:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1761:
1758:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1747:
1739:
1733:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1714:
1710:
1707:
1703:
1700:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1692:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1679:
1675:
1671:
1668:
1664:
1663:
1657:
1655:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1642:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1605:
1603:
1600:
1596:
1591:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1566:
1558:
1553:
1547:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1532:
1531:
1527:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1515:
1512:
1506:
1501:
1499:
1493:
1492:
1489:
1486:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1472:
1470:
1467:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1450:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1415:
1409:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1369:
1362:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1336:
1330:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1302:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1274:
1268:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1198:
1193:
1187:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1162:
1157:
1154:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1136:
1132:
1127:
1121:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1100:207.6.234.106
1097:
1092:
1085:
1080:
1074:
1066:
1063:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1039:
1031:
1028:
1026:
1021:
1017:
1016:
1010:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1000:
996:
991:
987:
983:
979:
978:
977:
976:
973:
969:
963:
962:
961:
960:
956:
952:
948:
944:
937:
935:
934:
930:
926:
919:
918:
917:
911:
910:
909:
903:
900:
899:
898:
891:
889:
888:
884:
880:
875:
871:
864:
860:
856:
852:
851:
850:
849:
845:
841:
837:
818:
814:
810:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
779:
775:
771:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
740:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
714:
710:
706:
702:
698:
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
680:
676:
672:
668:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
650:
647:
645:
640:
636:
635:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
620:
616:
612:
607:
606:
605:
604:
601:
597:
593:
588:
587:
586:
585:
581:
577:
573:
568:
567:
562:
556:
550:
546:
542:
538:
537:
536:
535:
532:
528:
524:
520:
519:
516:
513:
509:
508:
507:
505:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
476:
475:
474:
470:
466:
458:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
435:
434:
430:
426:
421:
419:
416:
414:
411:
408:
407:
406:
405:
401:
397:
388:
386:
385:
381:
377:
373:
365:
363:
362:
359:
356:
347:
342:
339:
335:
331:
330:
329:
328:
325:
321:
313:
307:
304:
300:
299:
298:
295:
291:
290:
289:
287:
279:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
250:
249:
248:
245:
241:
240:
239:
238:
235:
231:
227:
222:
216:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
189:
185:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
142:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
116:
112:
108:
105:
101:
97:
93:
89:
86:
82:
78:
77:
76:
69:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2187:
2166:
2163:
2138:source check
2117:
2111:
2108:
2081:
2078:
2056:
2053:
2033:
2024:
2011:
2007:
2003:
2001:
1974:
1971:
1948:
1928:
1919:
1914:
1910:
1908:
1849:
1846:
1798:— Preceding
1790:
1757:David Arthur
1743:
1718:
1717:
1690:
1689:
1681:
1626:
1570:
1529:
1497:
1476:
1468:
1454:
1433:David Arthur
1368:This article
1366:
1347:David Arthur
1306:
1243:
1210:
1164:
1159:
1158:
1155:
1140:
1088:
1043:
1018:
1013:
1008:
995:David Arthur
989:
981:
967:
951:Whatever2009
949:
945:
941:
925:Whatever2009
923:
915:
907:
895:
867:
840:David Arthur
833:
809:David Arthur
705:David Arthur
637:
632:
569:
564:
563:
560:
541:David Arthur
512:David Arthur
501:
484:David Arthur
465:Klaus with K
462:
443:David Arthur
396:David Arthur
392:
369:
358:24.80.100.72
351:
338:Unregistered
324:David Arthur
319:
317:
283:
253:— Preceding
244:David Arthur
242:I'd say so.
223:
220:
192:— Preceding
184:September 21
73:
60:
43:
37:
2084:Canada Line
2018:Sourcecheck
1977:Canada Line
1852:Canada Line
1691:Don't panic
1094:—Preceding
855:Greg Salter
259:Ground Zero
230:Ground Zero
226:Canada Line
217:Canada Line
161:November 22
145:November 19
134:November 18
98:BC Premier
36:This is an
2175:Report bug
2065:Report bug
1609:Babyox4420
1574:Babyox4420
1373:TastyCakes
1303:System Map
504:Phillipe83
294:Stormscape
286:Phillipe83
173:December 1
2158:this tool
2151:this tool
2048:this tool
2041:this tool
1949:Cheers. —
1943:this tool
1936:this tool
1804:Cganuelas
1641:over here
1599:Ravendrop
1551:Speak up!
1485:Vortigern
1413:Speak up!
1389:Vortigern
1334:Speak up!
1287:Vortigern
1272:Speak up!
1231:Vortigern
1191:Speak up!
1166:Vortigern
1137:Cambie St
1125:Speak up!
1078:Speak up!
1065:CANCELLED
104:Coquitlam
61:Archive 1
2164:Cheers.—
2054:Cheers.—
1862:cbignore
1812:contribs
1800:unsigned
1740:Vehicles
1699:non-free
1545:єmarsee
1526:Denelson
1457:rakslice
1451:Seating?
1407:єmarsee
1363:Capacity
1328:єmarsee
1308:implied.
1266:єmarsee
1185:єmarsee
1119:єmarsee
1096:unsigned
1072:єmarsee
1047:Klparrot
980:There's
879:rakslice
770:Hyandrew
671:Hyandrew
523:rakslice
441:myself.
439:this one
267:contribs
255:unsigned
206:contribs
194:unsigned
129:Billion.
70:Untitled
2088:my edit
2004:checked
1981:my edit
1959::Online
1911:checked
1856:my edit
198:Webgeer
156:budget.
122:June 30
111:June 18
92:June 15
39:archive
2012:failed
1870:nobots
1310:SJrX10
1247:JimWae
1213:JimWae
1161:area).
1144:JimWae
1009:entire
742:why...
425:Tafyrn
376:Tafyrn
303:Usgnus
280:Sketch
168:grade.
1746:Jfruh
1015:Ckatz
982:never
634:Ckatz
611:Jfruh
592:Jfruh
576:Jfruh
81:May 7
16:<
2008:true
1915:true
1833:talk
1808:talk
1775:talk
1727:talk
1649:talk
1645:Ds13
1613:talk
1578:talk
1461:talk
1437:talk
1393:talk
1377:talk
1351:talk
1314:talk
1291:talk
1251:talk
1235:talk
1217:talk
1170:talk
1148:talk
1104:talk
1051:talk
999:talk
955:talk
929:talk
883:talk
859:talk
844:talk
813:talk
774:talk
709:talk
701:ALRT
675:talk
615:talk
596:talk
580:talk
545:talk
527:talk
498:Name
488:talk
469:talk
447:talk
429:talk
400:talk
380:talk
263:talk
202:talk
188:2005
177:2004
165:2004
149:2004
138:2004
126:2004
115:2004
96:2004
85:2004
2132:RfC
2102:to
2022:).
2010:or
1995:to
1902:to
1892:to
1882:to
1024:spy
739:FAQ
643:spy
320:not
182:On
171:On
159:On
143:On
132:On
120:On
109:On
90:On
79:On
2145:.
2140:}}
2136:{{
2020:}}
2016:{{
1868:{{
1864:}}
1860:{{
1835:)
1814:)
1810:•
1777:)
1729:)
1721:--
1651:)
1615:)
1580:)
1548:•
1530:83
1510:?!
1463:)
1439:)
1410:•
1395:)
1379:)
1353:)
1331:•
1316:)
1293:)
1269:•
1253:)
1245:--
1237:)
1219:)
1188:•
1172:)
1150:)
1142:--
1122:•
1106:)
1075:•
1053:)
1001:)
990:is
957:)
931:)
885:)
861:)
846:)
815:)
776:)
711:)
677:)
617:)
609:--
598:)
590:--
582:)
547:)
529:)
490:)
471:)
449:)
431:)
423:--
402:)
382:)
269:)
265:•
232:|
228:?
208:)
204:•
186:,
175:,
163:,
147:,
136:,
124:,
113:,
94:,
83:,
2177:)
2173:(
2160:.
2153:.
2067:)
2063:(
2050:.
2043:.
2031:Y
1945:.
1938:.
1926:Y
1831:(
1806:(
1773:(
1725:(
1647:(
1611:(
1576:(
1507:/
1504:™
1459:(
1435:(
1391:(
1375:(
1349:(
1312:(
1289:(
1249:(
1233:(
1215:(
1168:(
1146:(
1102:(
1049:(
997:(
968:]
953:(
927:(
881:(
857:(
842:(
811:(
772:(
707:(
673:(
613:(
594:(
578:(
543:(
525:(
486:(
467:(
445:(
427:(
398:(
378:(
343:)
336:(
261:(
234:t
200:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.