343:, the most commonly used newspapers of this page, the New York Times and New York Daily News, are "generally reliable"). For the NPOV concern, that is why I've added so many sources to the article, so everything is covered as neutrally as possible while also being comprehensive. I was confused about your comment because many of the sources I've found are newspapers - had I found more books and journals about this topic, I would not hesitate to include them.
727:
705:
689:
664:
648:
630:
618:
598:
582:
570:
562:
536:
512:
53:
293:
use of news articles to be problematic, since a large part of the article is about the building's history. As far as I'm aware, the GA criteria do not have any restriction on how many references should be of a certain type, only that the sources be reliable. I apologize if this sounds overly straightforward, but I don't think there is an issue here.
292:
The majority of NYC building pages, aside from the most famous ones, do not have a lot of coverage in architectural books or journals. Actually, this applies to most building pages in general. Furthermore, several architectural/real estate journals are already used in the page. I do not consider the
222:
Earwig's
Copyvio Detector states there is a 13.8% similarity with the Landmarks Preservation Commission's report of December 16, 2008, Designation List 408 LP-2297 and 11.5% with the 1986 article by Goldberger in the New York Times. I also note that Goldberger wrote more of the cited articles so it
323:
which may give insight into my concern. However, I understand the limitations of having to use the sources that there are and, as I say, these seem to be all reliable sources so this is a comment rather than anything else.
176:
This looks an interesting article. So many people like me must have seen this tower each time they have been to the
Carnegie, but I cannot say I ever paid that much attention to it. I will start the review shortly.
338:
Thanks for the clarification. For 2b, I have ensured all the sources are reliable. I made sure none of the sources are from deprecated/disallowed sources or those considered generally unreliable (as per
58:
459:
I have changed it accordingly. It was indeed among the most slender skyscrapers according to the sources, but slender buildings may be a more difficult target to define.
226:
The match with
Goldberger's work seems to be with proper names and a quote, which is properly attributed to the article. Goldberger was the architectural writer for
91:
137:
81:
683:
133:
530:
63:
118:
522:
286:
110:
289:. However, there is a heavy reliance on newspaper articles. Are there any peer reviewed papers or reputable books that can be included?
699:
167:
695:
556:
526:
639:
86:
230:
so, considering this topic matter, I would say it is reasonable for him to have written quite a few articles on the building.
576:
37:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
751:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
509:
the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
212:
The lead is about 300 words long, which is near optimal for an article of this size (3,048 words of readable prose).
518:
435:
126:
17:
549:
718:
645:
it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
624:
612:
737:
733:
478:
474:
443:
439:
396:
392:
364:
360:
329:
325:
249:
245:
182:
178:
161:
592:
588:
464:
418:
348:
298:
274:
235:
661:
it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
103:
308:
676:
454:
408:
157:
714:
460:
429:
414:
386:
344:
294:
270:
231:
197:
316:
312:
223:
could be there is repetition in his work. Please can you check and edit if necessary.
340:
320:
201:
741:
482:
468:
447:
422:
400:
368:
352:
333:
302:
278:
253:
239:
186:
171:
263:
196:
This article is well written. It is stable, with 72.3% of the authorship by
413:
Thanks for the review. I have addressed all the issues you brought up.
682:
images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid
559:, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
145:
114:
217:
All images have appropriate
Creative Commons licenses.
434:
Thank you. Are the also addressing the comment from
627:
on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
315:. Please take a look at the list of newspapers in
679:and other media, where possible and appropriate.
473:Excellent work. I will now complete the review.
567:all inline citations are from reliable sources;
438:about the slenderest building claim please?
8:
717:. This article meets the criteria to be a
41:
204:. The article is currently classed as a
72:
44:
7:
33:The following discussion is closed.
686:are provided for non-free content;
319:and the comments on news media in
24:
307:The relevant GA criteria are 2b.
747:The discussion above is closed.
725:
703:
687:
662:
646:
628:
616:
596:
580:
568:
560:
534:
510:
266:? If so, please add a wikilink.
499:The six good article criteria:
391:Please see my comments above.
359:I am glad that is cleared up.
262:Is the coffee shop mentioned a
1:
742:03:39, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
483:03:38, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
469:00:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
448:20:25, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
423:17:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
401:16:37, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
369:03:38, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
353:00:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
334:20:25, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
303:17:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
279:17:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
254:20:25, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
240:17:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
187:16:23, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
172:16:23, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
726:
704:
688:
663:
647:
629:
617:
597:
581:
569:
561:
535:
511:
766:
269:Yes, I've added the link.
749:Please do not modify it.
285:All references are from
35:Please do not modify it.
18:Talk:Carnegie Hall Tower
244:Excellent. Thank you.
696:relevant to the topic
640:neutral point of view
607:broad in its coverage
517:it complies with the
589:copyright violations
577:no original research
684:fair use rationales
436:DragonflySixtyseven
545:factually accurate
228:The New York Times
36:
713:Congratulations,
700:suitable captions
611:it addresses the
557:reference section
503:It is reasonable
100:
99:
34:
757:
729:
728:
707:
706:
691:
690:
666:
665:
650:
649:
632:
631:
620:
619:
600:
599:
584:
583:
572:
571:
564:
563:
538:
537:
514:
513:
458:
433:
412:
390:
287:reliable sources
150:
141:
122:
54:Copyvio detector
42:
765:
764:
760:
759:
758:
756:
755:
754:
753:
752:
587:it contains no
521:guidelines for
519:Manual of Style
497:
452:
427:
406:
384:
194:
131:
108:
102:
96:
68:
39:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
763:
761:
746:
745:
744:
711:
710:
709:
708:
692:
669:
668:
667:
653:
652:
651:
635:
634:
633:
621:
603:
602:
601:
585:
573:
565:
555:it contains a
541:
540:
539:
515:
496:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
283:
282:
281:
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
219:
218:
214:
213:
193:
190:
151:
98:
97:
95:
94:
89:
84:
78:
75:
74:
70:
69:
67:
66:
64:External links
61:
56:
50:
47:
46:
40:
31:
30:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
762:
750:
743:
739:
735:
732:
724:
723:
722:
720:
716:
701:
697:
693:
685:
681:
680:
678:
674:
670:
660:
659:
658:
654:
644:
643:
642:
641:
636:
626:
622:
615:of the topic;
614:
610:
609:
608:
604:
594:
590:
586:
578:
574:
566:
558:
554:
553:
552:
551:
546:
542:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
508:
507:
506:
502:
501:
500:
494:
484:
480:
476:
472:
471:
470:
466:
462:
456:
451:
450:
449:
445:
441:
437:
431:
426:
425:
424:
420:
416:
410:
405:
404:
403:
402:
398:
394:
388:
370:
366:
362:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
350:
346:
342:
337:
336:
335:
331:
327:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
305:
304:
300:
296:
291:
290:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
267:
265:
261:
255:
251:
247:
243:
242:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
224:
221:
220:
216:
215:
211:
210:
209:
207:
203:
200:and 24.8% by
199:
191:
189:
188:
184:
180:
174:
173:
169:
166:
163:
159:
156:
152:
149:
148:
144:
139:
135:
130:
129:
125:
120:
116:
112:
107:
106:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
77:
76:
71:
65:
62:
60:
57:
55:
52:
51:
49:
48:
43:
38:
26:
19:
748:
730:
719:Good Article
712:
694:images are (
672:
656:
638:
613:main aspects
606:
575:it contains
548:
544:
505:well written
504:
498:
383:
227:
205:
195:
175:
164:
154:
153:
146:
142:
128:Article talk
127:
123:
104:
101:
92:Instructions
32:
734:simongraham
698:, and have
673:illustrated
531:word choice
475:simongraham
455:Simongraham
440:simongraham
409:Simongraham
393:simongraham
361:simongraham
326:simongraham
309:WP:RELIABLE
264:coffeehouse
246:simongraham
179:simongraham
158:Simongraham
115:visual edit
715:Epicgenius
623:it stays f
593:plagiarism
550:verifiable
495:Assessment
461:Epicgenius
430:Epicgenius
415:Epicgenius
387:Epicgenius
345:Epicgenius
295:Epicgenius
271:Epicgenius
232:Epicgenius
198:Epicgenius
59:Authorship
45:GA toolbox
637:It has a
155:Reviewer:
82:Templates
73:Reviewing
27:GA Review
202:Mertbiol
192:Comments
168:contribs
87:Criteria
625:focused
317:WP:DEPS
313:WP:NPOV
311:and 5.
138:history
119:history
105:Article
677:images
671:It is
657:stable
655:It is
605:It is
543:It is
527:layout
341:WP:RSP
321:WP:PUS
206:Start
147:Watch
16:<
738:talk
731:Pass
591:nor
547:and
529:and
523:lead
479:talk
465:talk
444:talk
419:talk
397:talk
365:talk
349:talk
330:talk
299:talk
275:talk
250:talk
236:talk
183:talk
162:talk
134:edit
111:edit
675:by
740:)
721:.
525:,
481:)
467:)
446:)
421:)
399:)
367:)
351:)
332:)
301:)
277:)
252:)
238:)
208:.
185:)
170:)
136:|
117:|
113:|
736:(
702:.
595:.
579:;
533:.
477:(
463:(
457::
453:@
442:(
432::
428:@
417:(
411::
407:@
395:(
389::
385:@
363:(
347:(
328:(
297:(
273:(
248:(
234:(
181:(
165:·
160:(
143:·
140:)
132:(
124:·
121:)
109:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.