303:
282:
392:
371:
402:
21:
1158:
1138:
1122:
1094:
1073:
1050:
1038:
1017:
1001:
989:
962:
946:
166:
107:
887:
far as number of edits, although I suspect this article was transferred from a userspace draft), I usually keep the changes down to minor revisions and additions of material. It wasn't technically necessary for you to request a second opinion, but I will give it to you anyway. I gave the article a quick read, and couldn't find anything wrong. I'd say go ahead and pass it. --
218:
197:
777:
results, one of which I can't read. That's not the one I mentioned, though. What happens if you search for "Written in Blood: A History of
Forensic Detection‎"? That's the book with the info, and I am able to access the relevant chapter. Let me know ... if not, we'll have to figure something out. I'm
1209:
It doesn't say, but I assume the answer is "he wasn't formally charged": the intent was probably not to charge him with anything (and this is 1913. Police guidelines are a bit, ahem, "looser" than they are now) but instead to prevent
Williams knowing who had trapped him. I've clarified the gun point
886:
its nomination should review the article. It is ok to embrace the spirit of "fix it yourself" and make any changes you deem necessary to improve the article. Although I'm not sure many other editors take it as far as you have in this case (you currently rank as the top contributor to this article as
743:
one - the others you could get via inter-library loan. I saw from your user page that you're at university - does your university library perhaps have any of the titles? If not, I'm sure they can get them for you. Or maybe not - how does that work in the UK? I'm in the US... if you can't get them, I
647:
Here is where the big problem lies. Only two sources are cited, and as a result some issues brought up on the article are never fleshed out. For instance, no reason is given as to why
Williams was hooded. I found a source through Google Books that does give a reason, as well as other information not
1188:
A critical point seems to be the recovery of the gun that was allegedly used. It is stated that a gun was buried on the beach, but there is no mention of its recovery, although this is implied in the statement "by firing the gun ..." It seems to me a important - if the gun was recovered from where
822:
Excellent, thanks so much for going above and beyond :). And you get GA credit as well, so everybody wins :). Actually I did just have a thought; while I left most of my law books at home I do have a biography of Cecil
Whitely sitting on my desk, so I'll see if there is anything in there. I think I
807:
Ahhh... I think you've hit on it. That must be it; that does sound familiar. Well, I think this is what we'll have to do. I will add what I can to the article, and ask for a second reviewer rather than passing it on my own steam. I think that will be okay; if not, I'm sure someone will be eager to
518:
This case is repeatedly featured in the opening credits of the BBC's version of the
Sherlock Holmes mysteries (the Jeremy Brett version). did you know? There is a wide shot that tightens in on a paper boy hawking a paper, and then focuses on a paper that refers to the Eastbourne murders.
630:"Florence Seymour was the first person called to the witness box, and said that her statement was false, and that Edgar Powers had told her that she would be charged with murder if she did not make such a statement" - repeated "and"s in a sentence are awkward
902:
Thanks for chipping in, ErgoSum. I realize I've contributed to the article more than is appropriate, and that's precisely why I requested a second opinion. I would prefer it if you would pass the article rather than me, again for that reason.
792:
Yeah, that was my thinking too. Written in Blood: A History of
Forensic Detection comes up with one book on "snippet view". Is there something where perhaps the publisher has only consented to it being on google books within the US?
624:"When Seymour and Powers went to do this several policemen (who had been lying in wait) immediately arrested her and Powers, (who was released a few hours later)." - punctuation incorrect (or perhaps the sentence needs to be recast)
702:
Excellent, I'll get to work on your points immediately. Fantastic finding the reason he was hooded; I've read three books on the subject, none of which gave any kind of detail on that. I'll work that in in a tick.
758:
Thats the thing, I can't read "Written in Blood" at all. The UK has an inter-library loan system, but it is incredibly slow (in my experience, 2-3 weeks). I'll check the library, but I doubt I'll find anything.
484:. This cannot be correct as Crown Courts were not created until 1972. Can someone go back to the original references and find out where the trial actually took place - possible the Lewes Assizes. Similarly, the
1163:
After a thorough reading, I corrected a few minor copy issues. Interesting article, good job by
Ironholds, and I commend Ricardiana for going above and beyond what is expected of a reviewer. Article passed.
1244:
264:
1259:
229:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
230:
655:
by Colin and Damon Wilson. A number of other works referencing the murder pop up in Google Books but aren't available on-line to read; those could be inter-library loaned, though.
32:
1239:
225:
202:
851:
Outdent: righto, at the moment the stuff in the book only backs up things already there, so I'll let you add your stuff in before I fill it with lots of little ref tags.
1269:
1210:- the forensic expert used a different weapon of the same make and model to demonstrate similarities between Williams's weapon and the gun used to kill the victim.
343:
1254:
254:
687:
I am putting the article on hold. The main issue is with the sources - as more exist that provide helpful, relevant information, they should be incorporated.
648:
found in the article regarding motivations of witnesses, details on the use of ballistics (important as this is an early use of that sort of evidence), etc.
1264:
1249:
353:
778:
not sure how much I can contribute to the article and have it be kosher for me to pass it, is my only concern, or I would just add stuff myself.
551:
Done. occasional confusion of commas, and some of the pronouns were ambiguous, a few other ambiguities in clauses and prepositional phrases.
522:
On a different note, would you like me to fix up the grammar and punctuation? It's a bit ...ummmm... more flexible that it needs to be. :)
128:
1284:
1274:
454:
444:
744:
can see if I can try to get them from my university. It's an interesting case and I would actually enjoy reading more about it. Cheers,
50:
924:
567:
1289:
319:
1234:
1116:
593:
90:
38:
1279:
1011:
882:
Alright, here is my opinion. GA criteria states that only editors which have not significantly contributed to the article
717:
Interesting; all of the books seem to be "no preview"; did you say you can read them? Do you need to log into something?
310:
287:
177:
956:
485:
415:
376:
979:
419:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
589:
563:
527:
139:
492:
183:
121:
20:
908:
813:
783:
749:
692:
606:
555:
1215:
1195:
1169:
892:
870:
856:
828:
798:
764:
722:
708:
542:
506:
106:
318:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1199:
559:
523:
481:
42:
651:
Some sources are available to read through Google Books: the one I'm looking at right now is
1108:
489:
928:
904:
809:
779:
745:
688:
602:
302:
281:
148:
1211:
1165:
1063:
888:
866:
852:
824:
794:
760:
718:
704:
538:
502:
1228:
1132:
1219:
1203:
1173:
912:
896:
874:
860:
832:
817:
802:
787:
768:
753:
726:
712:
696:
610:
571:
546:
531:
495:
391:
370:
477:
401:
407:
397:
144:
115:
1189:
Seymour said it was, then clearly her statement was at least in part true.
596:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
315:
476:
The trial section repeatedly says that the trial took place in the
217:
196:
773:
Hmm, I just typed in "written in blood wilson" and came up with
420:
159:
823:
corrected the points you brought up about prose, by the way.
1131:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
1192:
A minor point - why was Power arrested - on what charge?
1115:
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
537:
That would be excellent :). I wasn't aware of that, no!
83:
1245:
Knowledge Did you know articles that are good articles
314:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
501:Righto, sorry. I seem to have misread the sources.
239:Knowledge:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
1260:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
998:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
242:Template:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
114:A fact from this article appeared on Knowledge's
865:Alright, I've stuck my meagre contributions in.
675:Criterion 6: illustrated, if possible, by images
663:Aside from the limited number of sources, yes.
635:Criterion 2: factually accurate and verifiable
48:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
8:
620:Mostly OK here. There are a few problems:
365:
276:
191:
62:
15:
1240:Social sciences and society good articles
33:Social sciences and society good articles
627:over-use of the phrase "perform a sting"
226:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
367:
278:
193:
1270:Low-importance Sussex-related articles
601:Will start reviewing shortly. Cheers,
151:when travelling to and from the court?
1255:Low-importance Crime-related articles
7:
413:This article is within the scope of
308:This article is within the scope of
223:This article is within the scope of
165:
163:
488:was not established until 1986. --
423:and the subjects encompassed by it.
182:It is of interest to the following
1070:Fair representation without bias:
643:Criterion 3: broad in its coverage
14:
41:. If you can improve it further,
1265:GA-Class Sussex-related articles
1156:
1136:
1120:
1092:
1071:
1048:
1036:
1015:
999:
987:
960:
944:
400:
390:
369:
301:
280:
216:
195:
164:
105:
19:
1250:GA-Class Crime-related articles
594:Talk:Case of the Hooded Man/GA1
449:This article has been rated as
348:This article has been rated as
259:This article has been rated as
29:has been listed as one of the
1:
322:and see a list of open tasks.
233:and see a list of open tasks.
1157:
1137:
1121:
1093:
1072:
1049:
1037:
1016:
1000:
988:
961:
945:
328:Knowledge:WikiProject Sussex
236:Crime and Criminal Biography
203:Crime and Criminal Biography
1285:Low-importance law articles
1275:WikiProject Sussex articles
331:Template:WikiProject Sussex
135:The text of the entry was:
1306:
986:A. References to sources:
572:00:38, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
547:00:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
532:00:02, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
455:project's importance scale
354:project's importance scale
265:project's importance scale
143:was so called because the
137:Did you know ... that the
1220:02:18, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
1204:00:34, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
1112:to illustrate the topic?
616:Criterion 1: well-written
496:19:51, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
486:Crown Prosecution Service
448:
429:Knowledge:WikiProject Law
385:
347:
296:
258:
211:
190:
147:was made to wear a black
65:
61:
1290:WikiProject Law articles
432:Template:WikiProject Law
1235:Knowledge good articles
1174:19:30, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
938:reasonably well written
913:18:28, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
897:18:23, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
875:09:12, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
861:07:16, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
833:07:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
818:07:05, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
803:07:03, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
788:06:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
769:06:51, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
754:06:22, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
727:06:10, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
713:06:02, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
697:02:27, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
611:01:57, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
334:Sussex-related articles
245:Crime-related articles
172:This article is rated
140:Case of the Hooded Man
27:Case of the Hooded Man
1280:GA-Class law articles
1030:broad in its coverage
39:good article criteria
1012:No original research
739:I can only read the
659:Criterion 4: neutral
91:Good article nominee
1117:fair use rationales
1091:No edit wars, etc:
808:let us know. Best,
667:Criterion 5: stable
1035:A. Major aspects:
975:factually accurate
943:A. Prose quality:
311:WikiProject Sussex
178:content assessment
66:Article milestones
1133:suitable captions
575:
558:comment added by
482:Lewes Crown Court
469:
468:
465:
464:
461:
460:
364:
363:
360:
359:
275:
274:
271:
270:
158:
157:
100:
99:
57:
1297:
1160:
1159:
1140:
1139:
1124:
1123:
1096:
1095:
1075:
1074:
1052:
1051:
1040:
1039:
1019:
1018:
1003:
1002:
991:
990:
964:
963:
948:
947:
741:Written in Blood
653:Written in Blood
574:
552:
437:
436:
433:
430:
427:
410:
405:
404:
394:
387:
386:
381:
373:
366:
336:
335:
332:
329:
326:
305:
298:
297:
292:
284:
277:
247:
246:
243:
240:
237:
220:
213:
212:
207:
199:
192:
175:
169:
168:
167:
160:
109:
86:
63:
46:
23:
16:
1305:
1304:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1225:
1224:
1186:
921:
685:
677:
669:
661:
645:
637:
618:
588:This review is
584:
553:
516:
514:Sherlock Holmes
474:
472:Crown Court????
434:
431:
428:
425:
424:
416:WikiProject Law
406:
399:
379:
333:
330:
327:
324:
323:
290:
244:
241:
238:
235:
234:
205:
176:on Knowledge's
173:
154:
153:
133:
82:
12:
11:
5:
1303:
1301:
1293:
1292:
1287:
1282:
1277:
1272:
1267:
1262:
1257:
1252:
1247:
1242:
1237:
1227:
1226:
1223:
1222:
1185:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1155:Pass or Fail:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1008:
1007:
1006:
996:
995:
994:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
953:
952:
951:
920:
919:Second opinion
917:
916:
915:
880:
879:
878:
877:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
732:
731:
730:
729:
684:
681:
676:
673:
668:
665:
660:
657:
644:
641:
636:
633:
632:
631:
628:
625:
617:
614:
599:
598:
583:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
515:
512:
511:
510:
473:
470:
467:
466:
463:
462:
459:
458:
451:Low-importance
447:
441:
440:
438:
412:
411:
395:
383:
382:
380:Low‑importance
374:
362:
361:
358:
357:
350:Low-importance
346:
340:
339:
337:
320:the discussion
306:
294:
293:
291:Low‑importance
285:
273:
272:
269:
268:
261:Low-importance
257:
251:
250:
248:
231:the discussion
221:
209:
208:
206:Low‑importance
200:
188:
187:
181:
170:
156:
155:
134:
113:
112:
110:
102:
101:
98:
97:
94:
87:
79:
78:
75:
72:
68:
67:
59:
58:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1302:
1291:
1288:
1286:
1283:
1281:
1278:
1276:
1273:
1271:
1268:
1266:
1263:
1261:
1258:
1256:
1253:
1251:
1248:
1246:
1243:
1241:
1238:
1236:
1233:
1232:
1230:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1190:
1183:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1162:
1161:
1154:
1153:
1151:
1148:
1142:
1141:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1125:
1118:
1114:
1113:
1111:
1110:
1104:
1098:
1097:
1090:
1089:
1087:
1083:
1077:
1076:
1069:
1068:
1066:
1065:
1060:
1054:
1053:
1046:
1042:
1041:
1034:
1033:
1031:
1027:
1021:
1020:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1004:
997:
993:
992:
985:
984:
982:
981:
976:
972:
966:
965:
958:
954:
950:
949:
942:
941:
939:
935:
934:
933:
932:
930:
927:review – see
926:
918:
914:
910:
906:
901:
900:
899:
898:
894:
890:
885:
876:
872:
868:
864:
863:
862:
858:
854:
850:
834:
830:
826:
821:
820:
819:
815:
811:
806:
805:
804:
800:
796:
791:
790:
789:
785:
781:
776:
772:
771:
770:
766:
762:
757:
756:
755:
751:
747:
742:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
733:
728:
724:
720:
716:
715:
714:
710:
706:
701:
700:
699:
698:
694:
690:
682:
680:
674:
672:
666:
664:
658:
656:
654:
649:
642:
640:
634:
629:
626:
623:
622:
621:
615:
613:
612:
608:
604:
597:
595:
591:
586:
585:
581:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
550:
549:
548:
544:
540:
536:
535:
534:
533:
529:
525:
520:
513:
508:
504:
500:
499:
498:
497:
494:
491:
487:
483:
479:
471:
456:
452:
446:
443:
442:
439:
422:
418:
417:
409:
403:
398:
396:
393:
389:
388:
384:
378:
375:
372:
368:
355:
351:
345:
342:
341:
338:
321:
317:
313:
312:
307:
304:
300:
299:
295:
289:
286:
283:
279:
266:
262:
256:
253:
252:
249:
232:
228:
227:
222:
219:
215:
214:
210:
204:
201:
198:
194:
189:
185:
179:
171:
162:
161:
152:
150:
146:
142:
141:
131:
130:
129:April 9, 2009
125:
123:
122:Did you know?
117:
111:
108:
104:
103:
95:
93:
92:
88:
85:
81:
80:
76:
73:
70:
69:
64:
60:
55:
53:
52:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1194:
1191:
1187:
1149:
1106:
1085:
1062:
1047:B. Focused:
1029:
978:
974:
959:compliance:
937:
931:for criteria
923:
922:
883:
881:
774:
740:
686:
678:
671:Fine here.
670:
662:
652:
650:
646:
639:Fine here.
638:
619:
600:
587:
560:Auntieruth55
524:Auntieruth55
521:
517:
475:
450:
435:law articles
414:
349:
309:
260:
224:
184:WikiProjects
138:
136:
127:
119:
89:
49:
47:
43:please do so
31:
30:
26:
679:Fine here.
590:transcluded
554:—Preceding
490:Arwel Parry
478:Crown Court
421:legal field
84:May 3, 2009
1229:Categories
980:verifiable
905:Ricardiana
810:Ricardiana
780:Ricardiana
746:Ricardiana
689:Ricardiana
603:Ricardiana
408:Law portal
126:column on
37:under the
1212:Ironholds
1166:ErgoSum88
889:ErgoSum88
867:Ironholds
853:Ironholds
825:Ironholds
795:Ironholds
761:Ironholds
719:Ironholds
705:Ironholds
582:GA Review
539:Ironholds
503:Ironholds
145:defendant
116:Main Page
1196:Baska436
1107:contain
1105:Does it
929:WP:WIAGA
568:contribs
556:unsigned
480:, or in
174:GA-class
51:reassess
1184:The gun
1150:Overall
1064:neutral
683:Verdict
453:on the
352:on the
263:on the
118:in the
74:Process
1109:images
1086:stable
1084:Is it
1061:Is it
1028:Is it
973:Is it
936:Is it
884:before
493:(talk)
325:Sussex
316:Sussex
288:Sussex
180:scale.
96:Listed
77:Result
592:from
1216:talk
1200:talk
1170:talk
977:and
909:talk
893:talk
871:talk
857:talk
829:talk
814:talk
799:talk
784:talk
765:talk
750:talk
723:talk
709:talk
693:talk
607:talk
564:talk
543:talk
528:talk
507:talk
149:hood
71:Date
1010:C.
957:MoS
955:B.
775:two
445:Low
426:Law
377:Law
344:Low
255:Low
1231::
1218:)
1202:)
1172:)
1164:--
1152::
1135::
1119::
1088:?
1067:?
1032:?
1014::
983:?
940:?
925:GA
911:)
895:)
873:)
859:)
831:)
816:)
801:)
786:)
767:)
752:)
725:)
711:)
695:)
609:)
570:)
566:•
545:)
530:)
54:it
45:.
1214:(
1198:(
1168:(
907:(
891:(
869:(
855:(
827:(
812:(
797:(
782:(
763:(
748:(
721:(
707:(
691:(
605:(
562:(
541:(
526:(
509:)
505:(
457:.
356:.
267:.
186::
132:.
124:"
120:"
56:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
