Knowledge

Talk:Charles Bertram/GA1

Source 📝

171: 42: 227:
the review without any notification to improve the page & we're talking about a 600+ year old map. It's a public domain art image, regardless of how it's currently tagged in the Commons. What in God's name are you talking about w/r/t "rational" and "market
188:
Specifically, it requires full information to locate and verify the image's market value and correct license parameter. The current info is not enough to show where this image orginates to make verification. Further explanation is needed if accurate.
47: 80: 70: 193:
All other images are correctly licensed. If the addressed issues above are fixed, I can reassess this article against the six good article criteria.
126: 156: 122: 52: 107: 99: 75: 197:
Thank you for submitting your nomination, and I hope to talk with you soon to further address this article. Sincerely Yours,
221: 206: 150: 200: 146: 249: 229: 115: 17: 92: 170: 257: 237: 214: 160: 220:
I assume this isn't a joke, but it certainly should be. There's no point in
134: 103: 248:properly marked as a public-domain art image. — 179:based on a non free rational that is incomplete. 8: 184:File:Hereford Mappa Mundi detail Britain.jpg 30: 176:This nomination is being quick declined 61: 33: 7: 24: 244:And having clicked through... it 169: 1: 274: 258:14:06, 30 March 2015 (UTC) 238:14:02, 30 March 2015 (UTC) 215:19:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC) 161:19:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC) 18:Talk:Charles Bertram 211: 89: 88: 265: 255: 254: 235: 234: 212: 209: 205: 203: 202:CookieMonster755 173: 147:CookieMonster755 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 273: 272: 268: 267: 266: 264: 263: 262: 252: 250: 232: 230: 207: 201: 199: 178: 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 271: 269: 261: 260: 241: 240: 195: 194: 186: 185: 181: 180: 174: 165: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 270: 259: 256: 247: 243: 242: 239: 236: 226: 223: 219: 218: 217: 216: 213: 210: 204: 192: 191: 190: 183: 182: 177: 172: 168: 167: 166: 163: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 245: 224: 198: 196: 187: 175: 164: 153: 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 104:visual edit 228:value"? — 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 251:Llywelyn 231:Llywelyn 157:contribs 76:Criteria 225:failing 127:history 108:history 94:Article 208:(talk) 136:Watch 16:< 222:your 151:talk 123:edit 100:edit 253:II 246:is 233:II 159:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 154:· 149:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:Charles Bertram
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
CookieMonster755
talk
contribs
19:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

CookieMonster755
(talk)
19:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
your
LlywelynII
14:02, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
LlywelynII
14:06, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.