42:
487:...and the follow up question is - what date would it go back with - the 1st of July, which is the time it was nominated and, which would make it one of the older articles on the page - or the X of September, which might mean that by the time it got around the loop again it would be a six month turnaround on a GA...?
243:
My concern is more one of balance than unnecessary detail. That is, the detail on the escape is not necessarily unreasonable, but as it currently stands the article is roughly 40% material from the last 5 months. If you want to keep the current detail level for the escape, then I suggest working on
223:
Good morning and lovely to hear from you. The timing is particularly good as I'm just entering what should be a freeish week at work so can be around quite a bit to respond to issues raised. I've dealt with the tags - I've been looking for sources for them since I tagged the statements and haven't
278:
lists 4 or 5 examples; unfortunately, their article is not well referenced.) Chen apparently was already drawing national (but no international) attention in China before 2005. I find it hard to believe that none of the hundreds of
English stories run in 2005-6 contain any information about his
228:
previous version) but this has been pared down signifcantly and I have done some more in the last few hours. Also I think it's quite important to note that the escape is (so far) the thing that Chen has done that has best highlighted the issues he wanted to raise with his activism. I'm aware we
273:
Balance is a part of neutrality. Putting a large emphasis on the activity of the last six months creates a biased picture of Chen's life. I'm not saying there if a huge amount of material available on the pre-Linyi complaint activism, but there is certainly some. (The
187:: it focuses heavily on Chen's escape from China. While important, it is by far not the most important part of his career, yet it receives the most weight. Either that information should be pared down, or the other sections expanded (or both).
244:
expanding the rest of the article. For example, right now the article has 4 paragraphs on 10 years of activism, and 11 paragraphs for 2 months of escape. Surely the activism itself deserves greater weight than it is now receiving. --
258:
The issue there is the lack of good, reliable, sources for his activism - is balance part of the GA criteria? My wariness about the detail was criteria 3a, but if you're happy with the level of detail then are we okay on that one?
224:
been able to find anything reliable enough so the section has been rewritten. Similarly the lede has now lost it's training wheels, so to speak. The article's focus on the escape was a significant problem (see, for example,
400:
Great work indeed. Yes, my general concerns have been met. I will go over the article with a fine-toothed comb within the next two days or so to see if there are any minor concerns and post a formal review at that time.
282:
However, Chen is clearly known primarily for the Linyi complaint and its aftermath. Unfortunately, this area also receives less weight than the recent escape from China. More can and should be written in this area.
321:
There have been efforts to expand on Chen's early life and activism, and more can be done there. Thaddeus, any thoughts on a reasonable timeframe to allow the page authors to address these issues?
209:
The concern about recentism is one that's been noted a couple times before. I'd mentioned I would do some work on this, and I think Khazar has maybe said same. Will put this higher on my to-do list.
180:(minor points) The lead should be all referenced or all non-referenced. (The latter is more normal.) Unless the date is important, that level of precision is not necessary in the lead.
287:
has a decent-sized article just on the case.) As the article stands, the implication is that it is primarily the escape is what makes Chen important, which is certainly not true. --
335:
As long as progress is being made, I am happy to leave the nomination open indefinitely. However, I don't anticipate the necessary additions taking more than a couple weeks. --
563:
I'm happy for it to be put back on the queue - with the proviso that if
ThaddeusB comes back okay then we'd definitely like them to continue - does that work for everyone?
47:
80:
70:
126:
173:
From a quick scan of the article, it looks to be pretty close to GA standards. However, a few things popped out at me that will need corrected:
451:
Thaddeus hasn't edited since the above comment. Should I put it back in the queue or are you fine waiting a little while longer for his return?
122:
52:
107:
473:
I think it's safe to say we would appreciate guidance on what would normally happen in such situations... what's the usual process?
604:
512:
462:
99:
156:
75:
229:
might run into criteria 3(b) here, but could we take that on a case-by-case basis? I'm looking forward to your full review.
284:
437:
No worries. Look forward to seeing your review, and hopefully we can address any outstanding issues promptly.
415:
My apologies. I was unexpectedly away the last week or so. I'll try to post a full review tonight. --
568:
554:
492:
478:
442:
390:
354:
326:
264:
234:
214:
115:
17:
420:
406:
340:
292:
249:
196:
150:
184:
564:
550:
488:
474:
438:
386:
379:
350:
322:
260:
230:
210:
92:
594:
502:
452:
416:
402:
336:
288:
245:
192:
146:
610:
572:
558:
518:
496:
482:
468:
446:
424:
410:
394:
358:
344:
330:
296:
268:
253:
238:
218:
200:
160:
501:
If it's put back in the queue, then it will go in July 1 where it is now.
275:
191:
Once these issues are addressed, I will conduct a more formal review. --
349:
Ok, I can't imagine it will take too long. Thanks for your patience.
385:). ThaddeusB, does this go some way to satisfying your concerns?
279:
prior career, and I'm sure
Chinese stories on that period exist.
383:
382:
has done an amazing job with the article (Changes here
225:
134:
103:
8:
30:
177:There are a few tags that need addressed
61:
33:
7:
183:Currently the article suffers form
549:Thanks for looking out, Wizardman.
378:Wow - since the GA review started
24:
611:03:07, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
573:18:17, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
559:16:30, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
519:16:05, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
497:07:06, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
483:15:53, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
469:15:45, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
447:20:43, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
425:16:49, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
411:05:48, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
395:15:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
627:
359:15:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
345:01:27, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
331:03:22, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
297:02:19, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
269:20:37, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
254:20:21, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
239:07:02, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
219:01:14, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
201:00:54, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
161:00:54, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
593:Sounds good, did so.
18:Talk:Chen Guangcheng
606:Operation Big Bear
514:Operation Big Bear
464:Operation Big Bear
285:Chinese Knowledge
276:Chinese Knowledge
89:
88:
618:
607:
601:
515:
509:
465:
459:
169:Initial comments
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
626:
625:
621:
620:
619:
617:
616:
615:
609:
605:
595:
517:
513:
503:
467:
463:
453:
171:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
624:
622:
614:
613:
603:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
511:
485:
461:
430:
429:
428:
427:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
280:
205:
189:
188:
181:
178:
170:
167:
165:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
623:
612:
608:
602:
600:
599:
592:
574:
570:
566:
562:
561:
560:
556:
552:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
520:
516:
510:
508:
507:
500:
499:
498:
494:
490:
486:
484:
480:
476:
472:
471:
470:
466:
460:
458:
457:
450:
449:
448:
444:
440:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
426:
422:
418:
414:
413:
412:
408:
404:
399:
398:
397:
396:
392:
388:
384:
381:
360:
356:
352:
348:
347:
346:
342:
338:
334:
333:
332:
328:
324:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
298:
294:
290:
286:
281:
277:
272:
271:
270:
266:
262:
257:
256:
255:
251:
247:
242:
241:
240:
236:
232:
227:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
208:
207:
206:
203:
202:
198:
194:
186:
182:
179:
176:
175:
174:
168:
166:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
597:
596:
505:
504:
455:
454:
377:
204:
190:
172:
164:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
104:visual edit
565:Fayedizard
551:Homunculus
489:Fayedizard
475:Fayedizard
439:Homunculus
387:Fayedizard
380:Homunculus
351:Homunculus
323:Homunculus
261:Fayedizard
231:Fayedizard
211:Homunculus
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
598:Wizardman
506:Wizardman
456:Wizardman
417:ThaddeusB
403:ThaddeusB
337:ThaddeusB
289:ThaddeusB
246:ThaddeusB
193:ThaddeusB
185:recentism
147:ThaddeusB
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
157:contribs
76:Criteria
127:history
108:history
94:Article
555:duihua
443:duihua
355:duihua
327:duihua
215:duihua
136:Watch
16:<
569:talk
493:talk
479:talk
421:talk
407:talk
391:talk
341:talk
293:talk
265:talk
250:talk
235:talk
226:this
197:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
571:)
557:)
495:)
481:)
445:)
423:)
409:)
401:--
393:)
357:)
343:)
329:)
295:)
267:)
252:)
237:)
217:)
199:)
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
567:(
553:(
491:(
477:(
441:(
419:(
405:(
389:(
353:(
339:(
325:(
291:(
283:(
263:(
248:(
233:(
213:(
195:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.