Knowledge

Talk:Chen Qiushi/GA1

Source 📝

746:
freedom groups, have expressed skepticism, and have unsuccessfully called on the government to allow outside contact with Chen." I'd recommend something like, "He was last heard from on 6 February, 2020, and his whereabouts are currently unknown. Chen's friends and family allege that the Chinese government informed them he has been detained for the purpose of quarantine. Critics, including media freedom groups...."
413: 385: 371: 516: 498: 466: 342: 324: 310: 296: 261: 227: 540: 53: 700:
I am fairly certain I have read in the MOS that any sentences containing direct quotes need to have citations at the end of the sentence, even if the following sentences rely on the same citation. Although I'm now struggling to find where I read that. Do you mind just citing the sentence in question
762:
Detainment for legitimate quarantine is still technically a form of detainment, I can see how it would be unclear. How about this: "He was last heard from on 6 February 2020; as of May 2020, his whereabouts remain unknown. The Chinese government reportedly informed Chen's family and friends that he
708:
Has the Chinese government issued any statements on any of the referenced controversies above, specifically related to missing persons, that can be included for balance? Also, have any major or credible news sourced offered alternative explanations for Chen's disappearance? I think these would all
628:
This seems to imply that Caixin and Sanlian Lifeweek have strayed from the "official line" at least somewhat, as Chen's reporting does not contrast as much with these sources as it does the government's. It would be helpful to know the extent to which their reporting has differed from the official
745:
Rereading the lead, I think these couple of sentences are still a bit problematic: "He was last heard from on 6 February 2020 after being detained by the Chinese government. The government has allegedly stated Chen was detained for the purpose of coronavirus quarantine; critics, including media
728:
Given the news of Li's resurfacing, I think this sentence "Republican lawmakers in the U.S. have called for an inquiry..." should now read, "Republican lawmakers in the U.S. called for an inquiry..." I also think it should be mentioned that Li states he was quarantined during his disappearance.
432:
I'm not sure what you mean by second-hand sources in this context. The WP:RS quote the Chinese government stating that he was detained for quarantine, and quote other parties assessing his detainment may have been due to his "citizen journalism" activities. I just did a search for "why was chen
659:
I think this needs to specify who is the direct source of this information. It appears it is either his friend or his mother. If the authorities have made any known statements about Chen's disappearance, source that. Otherwise, make it clear that the information is
658:"On 7 February, family and friends received news from authorities that Chen had been detained at an undeclared time and place and held in an unknown location. The authorities claimed that the reason for the detention was quarantine." --: --> 418:
His whereabouts are unknown, but only one hypothesis is given from anything other than second-hand sources. Surely there is at least one alternative explanation given by a notable source, however unlikely that explanation may
597:"Days after the videos' release, he was detained by Beijing authorities, who deleted his Sina Weibo account and videos" -- I would make clear when the authorities released him after his detainment. 562:
Nothing in the english-language RS that I can access, no. I searched just now for "Heilongjiang chen qiushi" on the grounds that a bio would include his university, but didn't find anything new.
627:"Chen's reporting contrasted with Caixin and Sanlian Lifeweek, which have "lines they cannot cross", and contrasted even more strongly with the "official line" of state-controlled media" --: --> 767:
quarantine. Critics, including media freedom groups, have expressed skepticism about government motives, and have unsuccessfully called on the government to allow outside contact with Chen."
648:
What about something like, "According to SCMP, Chen's reporting was more critical of the Chinese government than other critical news sources, which have "lines they cannot cross"...." ?
824:
Your latest round of suggestions sound good to me, how do I find out who requested the GA review in the first place? I'd like to ping him/her for opinion on the changes as well.
634:
This is SCMP's opinion, which they don't elaborate further on in the sourced article. It can be removed if desired, SCMP isn't an impartial source in the first place.
203: 249: 91: 602:
I elaborated based on the sources, there appear to be no english RS on it other than the quoted SCMP, based on a Google News search narrowed to the year 2019.
81: 58: 490: 681:"Amnesty International's Patrick Poon said around 14 February 2020. . . " I think this sentence needs to be cited because it includes a direct quote. 253: 245: 557:
Is there nothing else that can be included in this section? Family background, what sort of lawyer, origin of activism, etc. would all be welcome.
713:
There does not appear to be any official response, nor have any alternative explanations been reported on by the English RS that I'm aware of.
302: 237: 137: 508: 193: 133: 63: 471:
The article appears not to be involved in an edit war and has been consistent with its presentation of a currently unfolding event
504: 288: 241: 167: 399: 199: 118: 86: 316: 37:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
926:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
110: 233: 890: 829: 772: 718: 691: 670: 639: 607: 567: 438: 278: 377: 363: 885:
I think I've addressed all the remaining issues with today's edits, let me know if I missed something.
521:
I'm not an expert on image licensing but this appears to be okay according to my limited understanding
904: 876: 854: 751: 734: 581: 334: 330: 182: 161: 886: 864: 838: 825: 768: 714: 687: 666: 635: 603: 563: 434: 390:
Early life is stubby and should be fleshed out if possible. See comments below for other issues
480: 126: 17: 842: 622:
source says 433,000. Minor difference but in an article this short, may as well be precise.
900: 872: 868: 850: 846: 821: 747: 730: 577: 178: 157: 433:
qiushi detained" and didn't find a third explanation, at least not on the first page.
849:
was the nominator. Mariogoods, what do you think of the recommended changes? Thanks,
796: 686:
I don't understand, isn't it already cited along with the following sentences to ?
210:
This article is well-written and I think it can make it to GA with a few additions
629:
line, and what the official line of the state controlled media was at that time.
103: 764: 908: 894: 880: 858: 833: 776: 755: 738: 722: 695: 674: 643: 611: 585: 571: 442: 186: 171: 841:, you can find that info on the good article nomination page ( 843:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Good_article_nominations
871:
is out of the picture for now. What do you want to do?
145: 114: 484:and other media, where possible and appropriate. 701:to be safe? Better to over-cite than under-cite. 797:"Why have two reporters in Wuhan disappeared?" 489:(images are tagged and non-free content have 8: 41: 787: 177:Beginning this review now. Stay tuned. 72: 44: 665:That is... an excellent point, fixed. 763:has been detained for the purpose of 576:Okay, I guess it is what it is, then 7: 33:The following discussion is closed. 621:430,00 youtube subscribers --: --> 24: 922:The discussion above is closed. 538: 514: 496: 464: 411: 408:Fair representation without bias 383: 369: 340: 322: 308: 294: 259: 225: 539: 202:for what the criteria are, and 795:BBC Staff (14 February 2020). 593:Journalism Hong Kong Protests 222:(prose, spelling, and grammar) 1: 709:have a place in this article. 515: 497: 465: 412: 384: 370: 341: 323: 309: 295: 260: 226: 941: 859:12:38, 26 April 2020 (UTC) 834:03:54, 26 April 2020 (UTC) 756:20:35, 24 April 2020 (UTC) 739:20:35, 24 April 2020 (UTC) 723:05:02, 23 April 2020 (UTC) 696:05:03, 23 April 2020 (UTC) 675:05:02, 23 April 2020 (UTC) 644:05:02, 23 April 2020 (UTC) 612:05:02, 23 April 2020 (UTC) 586:20:35, 24 April 2020 (UTC) 572:04:17, 23 April 2020 (UTC) 443:04:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC) 209: 187:18:59, 21 April 2020 (UTC) 172:18:59, 21 April 2020 (UTC) 924:Please do not modify it. 553:Childhood and education 35:Please do not modify it. 909:16:39, 7 May 2020 (UTC) 895:06:50, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 881:23:49, 2 May 2020 (UTC) 777:06:47, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 215:reasonably well written 206:for what they are not) 654:Feb 20 disappearance 478:It is illustrated by 400:neutral point of view 355:broad in its coverage 899:Looks good. Passing 491:fair use rationales 461:No edit wars, etc. 274:factually accurate 36: 509:suitable captions 289:reference section 100: 99: 34: 932: 812: 811: 809: 807: 792: 542: 541: 518: 517: 500: 499: 468: 467: 415: 414: 387: 386: 373: 372: 344: 343: 326: 325: 312: 311: 303:reliable sources 298: 297: 263: 262: 229: 228: 150: 141: 122: 54:Copyvio detector 42: 18:Talk:Chen Qiushi 940: 939: 935: 934: 933: 931: 930: 929: 928: 927: 817: 816: 815: 805: 803: 794: 793: 789: 505:appropriate use 397:It follows the 131: 108: 102: 96: 68: 39: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 938: 936: 921: 920: 919: 918: 917: 916: 915: 914: 913: 912: 911: 814: 813: 786: 785: 781: 780: 779: 759: 758: 742: 741: 711: 710: 705: 704: 703: 702: 683: 682: 678: 677: 662: 661: 652: 651: 650: 649: 631: 630: 624: 623: 615: 614: 599: 598: 591: 590: 589: 588: 559: 558: 552: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 445: 425: 424: 423: 422: 421: 420: 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 301:(citations to 270: 269: 268: 267: 266: 208: 207: 176: 151: 98: 97: 95: 94: 89: 84: 78: 75: 74: 70: 69: 67: 66: 64:External links 61: 56: 50: 47: 46: 40: 31: 30: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 937: 925: 910: 906: 902: 898: 897: 896: 892: 888: 887:Rolf H Nelson 884: 883: 882: 878: 874: 870: 867:, seems like 866: 865:Rolf h nelson 862: 861: 860: 856: 852: 848: 844: 840: 839:Rolf h nelson 837: 836: 835: 831: 827: 826:Rolf H Nelson 823: 819: 818: 802: 798: 791: 788: 784: 778: 774: 770: 769:Rolf H Nelson 766: 761: 760: 757: 753: 749: 744: 743: 740: 736: 732: 727: 726: 725: 724: 720: 716: 715:Rolf H Nelson 707: 706: 699: 698: 697: 693: 689: 688:Rolf H Nelson 685: 684: 680: 679: 676: 672: 668: 667:Rolf H Nelson 664: 663: 657: 656: 655: 647: 646: 645: 641: 637: 636:Rolf H Nelson 633: 632: 626: 625: 620: 619: 618: 613: 609: 605: 604:Rolf H Nelson 601: 600: 596: 595: 594: 587: 583: 579: 575: 574: 573: 569: 565: 564:Rolf H Nelson 561: 560: 556: 555: 554: 544: 543: 536: 533: 532: 530: 527: 520: 519: 512: 510: 506: 494: 492: 486: 485: 483: 482: 477: 470: 469: 462: 459: 458: 456: 452: 451: 444: 440: 436: 435:Rolf H Nelson 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 417: 416: 409: 406: 405: 403: 401: 396: 389: 388: 381: 379: 367: 365: 364:major aspects 359: 358: 356: 352: 346: 345: 338: 336: 332: 320: 318: 306: 304: 292: 290: 284: 283: 281: 280: 275: 271: 265: 264: 257: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 235: 223: 219: 218: 216: 212: 211: 205: 201: 197: 195: 191: 190: 189: 188: 184: 180: 174: 173: 169: 166: 163: 159: 156: 152: 149: 148: 144: 139: 135: 130: 129: 125: 120: 116: 112: 107: 106: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 79: 77: 76: 71: 65: 62: 60: 57: 55: 52: 51: 49: 48: 43: 38: 26: 19: 923: 804:. Retrieved 800: 790: 782: 712: 660:second-hand. 653: 616: 592: 551: 534: 528: 502: 488: 479: 460: 454: 407: 398: 375: 361: 354: 328: 314: 300: 286: 277: 273: 231: 221: 214: 192: 175: 164: 154: 153: 146: 142: 128:Article talk 127: 123: 104: 101: 92:Instructions 32: 806:29 February 246:word choice 115:visual edit 901:Newtack101 873:Newtack101 869:Mariogoods 851:Newtack101 847:Mariogoods 822:Newtack101 783:References 748:Newtack101 731:Newtack101 578:Newtack101 335:plagiarism 279:verifiable 179:Newtack101 158:Newtack101 59:Authorship 45:GA toolbox 617:COVID-19 535:Pass/Fail 155:Reviewer: 82:Templates 73:Reviewing 27:GA Review 801:BBC News 765:COVID-19 168:contribs 87:Criteria 529:Overall 378:focused 331:copyvio 250:fiction 138:history 119:history 105:Article 481:images 455:stable 453:It is 402:policy 353:It is 272:It is 252:, and 242:layout 213:It is 196:review 507:with 254:lists 198:(see 147:Watch 16:< 905:talk 891:talk 877:talk 855:talk 830:talk 808:2020 773:talk 752:talk 735:talk 719:talk 692:talk 671:talk 640:talk 608:talk 582:talk 568:talk 439:talk 333:and 276:and 238:lead 236:for 204:here 200:here 183:talk 162:talk 134:edit 111:edit 845:). 419:be. 234:MoS 907:) 893:) 879:) 857:) 832:) 799:. 775:) 754:) 737:) 721:) 694:) 673:) 642:) 610:) 584:) 570:) 537:: 531:: 513:: 501:b 495:: 487:a 463:: 457:. 441:) 410:: 404:. 382:: 374:b 368:: 360:a 357:. 339:: 327:d 321:: 317:OR 313:c 307:: 299:b 293:: 285:a 282:. 258:: 248:, 244:, 240:, 230:b 224:: 220:a 217:. 194:GA 185:) 170:) 136:| 117:| 113:| 903:( 889:( 875:( 863:@ 853:( 828:( 820:@ 810:. 771:( 750:( 733:( 717:( 690:( 669:( 638:( 606:( 580:( 566:( 511:) 503:( 493:) 437:( 380:) 376:( 366:) 362:( 337:) 329:( 319:) 315:( 305:) 291:) 287:( 256:) 232:( 181:( 165:· 160:( 143:· 140:) 132:( 124:· 121:) 109:(

Index

Talk:Chen Qiushi
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Newtack101
talk
contribs
18:59, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Newtack101
talk
18:59, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
GA
here
here
MoS
lead
layout
word choice
fiction

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.