715:
691:
677:
646:
622:
595:
585:
559:
545:
531:
499:
485:
385:
the lead says "However, some authors do not accept the two as distinct species." But the dissenting view offered is from Köhncke and
Leonhardt, an almost 25-year old opinion. Perhaps the lead sentence should instead say something like "in the past, some authors have not accepted the two" to better
152:
Further research reveals that "species pair" is a specific term used in lichen biology (although other biological disciplines use it as well) to refer to otherwise morphologically identical species that reproduce differently. I'll start a stub sometime.
414:
I think it's interesting and germaine to this article that there are at least 17 known extinct species of lemur, most of which were larger than the current versions (it's hinted at already but I think the details would be a worthy
333:
Thanks for reviewing! One question for you: you changed "there is more than one surviving species" to "there are more than one surviving species", which sounds really odd to me. Are you sure it is correct?
315:
specifically. I think I cited an abstract about the
Methuen collection in some other subfossil Madagascar article, but it didn't say anything about this species except that they found it.
375:
In
Goodman et al (2004) they mention that the subfossil remains are "presumed Holocene", and later "from Holocene paleontological sites", shouldn't that be mentioned in the article?
273:"…it may have eaten some of the big, now extinct subfossil lemurs that would have been too large for C. ferox, as well as smaller lemurids." ambiguous wording; could mean that
281:
and lemurids ate subfossil lemurs, or that subfossil lemurs were too big for the lemurids. Yes, it's deducible from context, but should be tweaked for unambiguity.
66:
390:
I might be a bit biased here, because I think
Goodman et al.'s evidence that it is a distinct species is rather weak. I changed it to a different wording.
300:
292:
62:
47:
404:
maybe mention explicitly that
Grandidier did not specify a holotype specimen? Similarly, should mention that Goodman et al. designated a neotype
139:
redirects to "cryptic species complex", by the way, which doesn't make much sense) that doesn't need explanation. Swapped "extant" for "living".
39:
344:
Fixed my error. Everything looks fine, will pass later tonight after I can read it through again carefully without worldly distractions.
463:
457:
669:
551:
237:"ecologically coexist" sounds like an odd construction to me… there's a word for this but I can't seem to remember it now
198:"specific name" is linked in the second paragraph of Taxonomy, but there's an unlinked "species name" in the first para
491:
55:
17:
517:
176:"G. Petit, writing in 1935," Shouldn't start sentence with an abbreviation… can you find his first name?
291:
have you tried a Google Book search? There's a few snippets that might be useful... see for example
425:
doncha think the 2 m long 30 kg fossa in a henhouse reported in Louvel 1954 is worthy of a mention?
180:
No, unfortunately. His surname is French for "small", and a rather common word, which doesn't help.
32:
106:"In some, it occurs together with C. ferox" unclear… do you mean occurs with subfossil bones of
218:"…and it was among the top carnivores of the island." clarify what is meant by "top carnivore"
659:
446:
430:
349:
335:
257:
158:
90:
608:
311:), but that there's no direct evidence; I don't think it would add anything to mention
683:
236:…suggesting that the two species may ecologically have been able to coexist." -: -->
537:
450:
433:
353:
338:
261:
162:
136:
94:
442:
345:
253:
154:
86:
307:
I did. The article already says that it probably ate subfossil lemurs (such as
227:
any value in including a map with the collection locations indicated?
441:
Thanks for the additions, I think it's "Good" enough to promote.
303:
snippet mentions the "Methuen collection" (not sure what that is)
192:
Not in
Goodman et al.—will have to dig up Lamberton for that.
419:
Added, and also threw in the elephant birds and the hippos.
277:
ate both subfossil lemurs and smaller lemurids, or that
74:
43:
408:Thought it might be too technical, but added.
8:
668:(images are tagged and non-free images have
295:, which mentions that it may have predated
135:Species pair seems a straightforward term (
429:Why not? Rather doubtful record, though.
7:
696:One image with appropriate license.
361:In the lead, I suggest simplifying
323:how about a pic of an extant fossa?
663:, where possible and appropriate.
131:link or gloss species pair, extant
24:
713:
689:
675:
644:
620:
617:Fair representation without bias
593:
583:
557:
543:
529:
504:Well written, complies with MoS.
497:
483:
252:Ah, now I remember... sympatry.
564:Well-cited to reliable sources.
1:
395:what was in Grandidier 1905?
714:
690:
676:
645:
621:
594:
584:
558:
544:
530:
498:
484:
386:reflect the current thought?
241:Was clumsy wording, changed.
125:Just evidence seems enough.
738:
222:Just the largest, changed.
120:"positive evidence" -: -->
451:14:56, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
434:07:27, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
354:19:38, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
339:17:51, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
262:06:07, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
230:Yes, will do (sometime).
163:19:38, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
95:17:25, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
18:Talk:Cryptoprocta spelea
473:reasonably well written
185:any details on how the
682:(appropriate use with
365:for some smaller words
657:It is illustrated by
609:neutral point of view
573:broad in its coverage
398:Will have to look up.
670:fair use rationales
189:jaw was different?
121:conclusive evidence
513:factually accurate
684:suitable captions
641:No edit wars etc.
729:
717:
716:
693:
692:
679:
678:
648:
647:
624:
623:
597:
596:
587:
586:
561:
560:
547:
546:
538:reliable sources
533:
532:
501:
500:
487:
486:
327:Good idea, done.
208:link postcranial
79:
70:
51:
737:
736:
732:
731:
730:
728:
727:
726:
606:It follows the
580:(major aspects)
363:contemporaneous
114:Yes, clarified.
60:
37:
31:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
735:
733:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
536:(citations to
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
468:
467:
439:
438:
437:
436:
422:
421:
420:
411:
410:
409:
401:
400:
399:
393:
392:
391:
382:
381:
380:
372:
371:
370:
357:
356:
331:
330:
329:
328:
319:
318:
317:
316:
288:
287:
286:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
245:
244:
243:
242:
233:
232:
231:
225:
224:
223:
215:
214:
213:
205:
204:
203:
195:
194:
193:
183:
182:
181:
172:
171:
170:
169:
168:
167:
166:
165:
143:
142:
141:
140:
128:
127:
126:
117:
116:
115:
80:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
734:
719:
718:
711:
708:
707:
705:
702:
695:
694:
687:
685:
673:
671:
665:
664:
662:
661:
656:
650:
649:
642:
639:
638:
636:
632:
626:
625:
618:
615:
614:
612:
610:
605:
599:
598:
591:
581:
577:
576:
574:
570:
563:
562:
555:
553:
541:
539:
527:
523:
522:
520:
519:
514:
510:
503:
502:
495:
493:
481:
477:
476:
474:
470:
469:
466:for criteria)
465:
461:
459:
455:
454:
453:
452:
448:
444:
435:
432:
428:
427:
426:
423:
418:
417:
416:
412:
407:
406:
405:
402:
397:
396:
394:
389:
388:
387:
383:
378:
377:
376:
373:
368:
367:
366:
364:
359:
358:
355:
351:
347:
343:
342:
341:
340:
337:
326:
325:
324:
321:
320:
314:
310:
306:
305:
304:
302:
298:
294:
289:
285:Moved around.
284:
283:
282:
280:
276:
271:
270:
263:
259:
255:
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
246:
240:
239:
238:
234:
229:
228:
226:
221:
220:
219:
216:
211:
210:
209:
206:
201:
200:
199:
196:
191:
190:
188:
184:
179:
178:
177:
174:
173:
164:
160:
156:
151:
150:
149:
148:
147:
146:
145:
144:
138:
134:
133:
132:
129:
124:
123:
122:
118:
113:
112:
111:
109:
104:
103:
102:
101:
97:
96:
92:
88:
85:
81:
78:
77:
73:
68:
64:
59:
58:
54:
49:
45:
41:
36:
35:
26:
19:
709:
703:
681:
667:
658:
640:
634:
616:
607:
589:
579:
572:
549:
535:
526:(references)
525:
516:
512:
489:
479:
472:
456:
440:
424:
413:
403:
384:
374:
362:
360:
332:
322:
312:
308:
296:
290:
278:
274:
272:
235:
217:
207:
197:
186:
175:
130:
119:
107:
105:
99:
98:
83:
82:
75:
71:
57:Article talk
56:
52:
33:
30:
313:Megaladapis
309:Megaladapis
297:Megaladapis
44:visual edit
518:verifiable
279:C. spellea
710:Pass/Fail
590:(focused)
415:addition)
275:C. spelea
84:Reviewer:
27:GA Review
108:C. ferox
100:Comments
704:Overall
480:(prose)
187:antamba
67:history
48:history
34:Article
660:images
635:stable
633:It is
611:policy
571:It is
511:It is
471:It is
460:review
443:Sasata
431:Ucucha
379:Added.
346:Sasata
336:Ucucha
254:Sasata
155:Sasata
87:Sasata
462:(see
369:Done.
212:Done.
202:Done.
76:Watch
16:<
515:and
464:here
447:talk
350:talk
301:this
293:this
258:talk
159:talk
91:talk
63:edit
40:edit
492:MoS
712::
706::
680:b
674::
666:a
643::
637:.
619::
613:.
592::
588:b
582::
578:a
575:.
556::
552:OR
542::
534:b
528::
524:a
521:.
496::
488:b
482::
478:a
475:.
458:GA
449:)
352:)
299:;
260:)
161:)
137:it
93:)
65:|
46:|
42:|
688::
686:)
672:)
554:)
550:(
548:c
540:)
494:)
490:(
445:(
348:(
256:(
157:(
110:?
89:(
72:·
69:)
61:(
53:·
50:)
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.