Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:2012 Crawley Borough Council election

Source đź“ť

187: 166: 276: 255: 106: 88: 57: 32: 413:
where this can be discussed for all the future UK local election articles (I note 8 such articles currently - with not much difference between ayn of them). I'm personally inclined towards The Rambling Man's view that we should not have these articles at this stage and think a discussion could at the
394:
I suggest you look at all of the future election articles, all follow the same with the same templates I also suggest looking at articles for elections where candidates are known but the election has not taken places the same results template is used, giving identical results to as on this page. I
432:
in this "article" that provides information that isn't in the 2011 article and it's unreferenced, contains broken templates and is frankly a shambles. They should be created when the election has taken place or if something "notable" has occurred prior to the election. I will have a look at the
379:
We shouldn't have articles that contain broken template links and we shouldn't have unreferenced articles and we shouldn't have articles that actually don't say anything of any use. Unless this is fixed, I'll AFD it.
348:
There are a number of red links here which appear to be part of a poorly/incorrectly used template. It needs to be fixed, or perhaps the article should be deleted until the election is actually referenced and notable.
363:
Under that reasoning there would never be a future class election article and the whole 2012 local elections template would need deleting. As for the red links that will correct itself when the election takes
237: 521: 227: 516: 471: 410: 203: 433:
discussion at the Wikiproject that Davewild has mentioned (should one exist) but will be inclined to nominate this, and the other 8 that Dave notes, for deletion sooner rather than later.
511: 506: 194: 171: 131: 113: 93: 531: 316: 526: 326: 186: 165: 536: 292: 395:
suggest moving this to the politics project if you wish to take this further as opposed to just critiquing my edits articles i create.--
489: 283: 260: 68: 199: 38: 438: 385: 354: 74: 56: 477: 434: 381: 350: 291:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
202:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
456: 442: 423: 404: 389: 373: 358: 485: 400: 369: 31: 17: 452: 419: 117:, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to 125: 481: 396: 365: 275: 254: 105: 87: 500: 448: 415: 447:
There isn't one currently but If you give me a bit I will be happy to start one.
129:
and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit
414:
wikiproject could reach consensus on when such articles should be created.
119: 288: 470:
A discussion regarding the subject raised here has been started
411:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
50: 26: 212:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
522:
Low-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
141:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Elections and Referendums
287:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 198:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 517:
Start-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
215:
Template:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
512:WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles 507:Start-Class Elections and Referendums articles 144:Template:WikiProject Elections and Referendums 8: 54: 409:May I also suggest having a discussion at 249: 195:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom 160: 82: 37:This article was previously nominated for 251: 218:Politics of the United Kingdom articles 162: 84: 532:Low-importance Sussex-related articles 114:WikiProject Elections and Referendums 7: 281:This article is within the scope of 192:This article is within the scope of 111:This article is within the scope of 527:Start-Class Sussex-related articles 73:It is of interest to the following 41:. The result of the discussion was 18:Talk:Crawley Council election, 2012 301:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sussex 147:Elections and Referendums articles 25: 274: 253: 185: 164: 104: 86: 55: 30: 321:This article has been rated as 232:This article has been rated as 209:Politics of the United Kingdom 200:Politics of the United Kingdom 172:Politics of the United Kingdom 1: 295:and see a list of open tasks. 206:and see a list of open tasks. 457:16:15, 29 October 2011 (UTC) 443:16:11, 29 October 2011 (UTC) 424:16:08, 29 October 2011 (UTC) 405:16:04, 29 October 2011 (UTC) 390:16:00, 29 October 2011 (UTC) 374:15:52, 29 October 2011 (UTC) 359:15:00, 29 October 2011 (UTC) 537:WikiProject Sussex articles 304:Template:WikiProject Sussex 553: 327:project's importance scale 238:project's importance scale 320: 269: 231: 180: 138:Elections and Referendums 99: 94:Elections and Referendums 81: 307:Sussex-related articles 63:This article is rated 67:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 284:WikiProject Sussex 69:content assessment 494: 480:comment added by 341: 340: 337: 336: 333: 332: 248: 247: 244: 243: 159: 158: 155: 154: 49: 48: 16:(Redirected from 544: 493: 474: 435:The Rambling Man 428:Agreed, there's 382:The Rambling Man 351:The Rambling Man 309: 308: 305: 302: 299: 278: 271: 270: 265: 257: 250: 220: 219: 216: 213: 210: 189: 182: 181: 176: 168: 161: 149: 148: 145: 142: 139: 132:our project page 126:electoral reform 108: 101: 100: 90: 83: 66: 60: 59: 51: 34: 27: 21: 552: 551: 547: 546: 545: 543: 542: 541: 497: 496: 475: 346: 306: 303: 300: 297: 296: 263: 217: 214: 211: 208: 207: 174: 146: 143: 140: 137: 136: 64: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 550: 548: 540: 539: 534: 529: 524: 519: 514: 509: 499: 498: 468: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 460: 459: 345: 342: 339: 338: 335: 334: 331: 330: 323:Low-importance 319: 313: 312: 310: 293:the discussion 279: 267: 266: 264:Low‑importance 258: 246: 245: 242: 241: 234:Low-importance 230: 224: 223: 221: 204:the discussion 190: 178: 177: 175:Low‑importance 169: 157: 156: 153: 152: 150: 109: 97: 96: 91: 79: 78: 72: 61: 47: 46: 35: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 549: 538: 535: 533: 530: 528: 525: 523: 520: 518: 515: 513: 510: 508: 505: 504: 502: 495: 491: 487: 483: 479: 473: 458: 454: 450: 446: 445: 444: 440: 436: 431: 427: 426: 425: 421: 417: 412: 408: 407: 406: 402: 398: 393: 392: 391: 387: 383: 378: 377: 376: 375: 371: 367: 361: 360: 356: 352: 343: 328: 324: 318: 315: 314: 311: 294: 290: 286: 285: 280: 277: 273: 272: 268: 262: 259: 256: 252: 239: 235: 229: 226: 225: 222: 205: 201: 197: 196: 191: 188: 184: 183: 179: 173: 170: 167: 163: 151: 134: 133: 128: 127: 122: 121: 116: 115: 110: 107: 103: 102: 98: 95: 92: 89: 85: 80: 76: 70: 62: 58: 53: 52: 44: 40: 36: 33: 29: 28: 19: 476:— Preceding 469: 429: 362: 347: 322: 282: 233: 193: 130: 124: 118: 112: 75:WikiProjects 42: 65:Start-class 501:Categories 482:Lucy-marie 397:Lucy-marie 366:Lucy-marie 344:Red links 120:elections 490:contribs 478:unsigned 449:Davewild 416:Davewild 364:place.-- 39:deletion 430:nothing 325:on the 236:on the 298:Sussex 289:Sussex 261:Sussex 71:scale. 486:talk 472:here 453:talk 439:talk 420:talk 401:talk 386:talk 370:talk 355:talk 43:keep 317:Low 228:Low 503:: 492:) 488:• 455:) 441:) 422:) 403:) 388:) 372:) 357:) 123:, 484:( 451:( 437:( 418:( 399:( 384:( 368:( 353:( 329:. 240:. 135:. 77:: 45:. 20:)

Index

Talk:Crawley Council election, 2012
Articles for deletion
deletion

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Elections and Referendums
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Elections and Referendums
elections
electoral reform
our project page
WikiProject icon
Politics of the United Kingdom
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
Politics of the United Kingdom
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Sussex
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Sussex
Sussex
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
The Rambling Man

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑