21:
74:
is unencyclopaedic, and appears to be written to reflect your username. Please don't take this as a personal dig; lots of people's first action on
Knowledge (XXG) is to write something about themselves or their choice of username! If you did write the page to reflect your username, why not move the content to
91:
There does not appear to be any page on
Knowledge (XXG) that lists this as a criterion for flagging an article as nonsense. If you do not believe that the term is in common usage you are free to edit the article to replace the word "popular" in the first section and I will not contest this; this is
73:
Hi - I nominated this page for speedy deletion. I flagged the page under the 'nonsense' tag because it's not, as the article suggests, common
British usage - a search under Google UK only brings up the Alan Partridge episode you reference (and I'm a Brit who's very fond of beans). The whole article
98:
This article is about the preparation and serving of foodstuffs. If this topic is considered unencyclopaedic then there is a long list of other articles which need to be considered for immediate removal from
Knowledge (XXG). If the language or terminology used in the article is not deemed to be of
129:
Perhaps we might add some categories to the page to get a better idea of how cup of means might relate to other things? It might help clarify how encylopedic the topic is.
31:
105:
Your inference, while understandable, is wrong. I chose the name of the account with the express purpose of submitting this article, not the other way around.
121:
64:
45:
27:
99:
sufficient quality then you are free to mark it as such; this does not warrant removal from
Knowledge (XXG).
109:
89:
I flagged the page under the 'nonsense' tag because it's not, as the article suggests, common
British usage
52:
20:
117:
60:
79:
48:
and therefore the reason given for the article being marked for speedy deletion is invalid.
130:
113:
75:
56:
35:
133:
82:
92:
not, however a valid reason for marking the article for deletion.
78:? I do hope you stay on Knowledge (XXG) and make some more edits.
44:
This article does not fall into either of the two categories in
15:
103:and appears to be written to reflect your username
8:
7:
96:The whole article is unencyclopaedic
34:was to merge with and redirect to
30:on 14 January 2007. The result of
14:
19:
46:Knowledge (XXG):Patent_Nonsense
26:This article was nominated for
1:
134:23:04, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
83:17:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
150:
126:
112:comment added by
69:
55:comment added by
42:
41:
141:
125:
106:
68:
49:
23:
16:
149:
148:
144:
143:
142:
140:
139:
138:
107:
50:
12:
11:
5:
147:
145:
104:
97:
90:
86:
85:
76:User:CupOBeans
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
146:
137:
135:
132:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
100:
93:
84:
81:
80:Squeezeweasel
77:
72:
71:
70:
66:
62:
58:
54:
47:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
128:
101:
94:
87:
43:
108:—Preceding
51:—Preceding
36:Baked beans
136:labrt2004
131:Labrt2004
114:CupOBeans
57:CupOBeans
122:contribs
110:unsigned
65:contribs
53:unsigned
28:deletion
102:: -->
95:: -->
88:: -->
118:talk
61:talk
124:)
120:•
67:)
63:•
116:(
59:(
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
