31:
823:
321:
technically and theoretically impossible without violating both your copyright and the criminal provisions of the DMCA. Further we refuse any gratis licence of this number or any other portion of your works, as we do not wish the copyright of our software to be encumbered by it. Yours
Sincerely, etc, etc.
92:
brought to my attention the fact that this page, which I had tagged for speedy deletion earlier today, is actually a full-fledged article and certainly not worthy of deletion. I have no idea what happened - when I tagged it, the article looked completely different, had hardly any content, and had no
500:
the reference link (which is cited in CNET and PC Magazine) because ELNEVER does not allow links which encourage copyright violations. By that account, the ZDNet and
Inquirer links used here serve exactly the same purpose, never mind the actual keys themselves, which are posted in full here. If you
261:
said, "refrain from posting or causing to be provided any AACS circumvention offering or from assisting others in doing so, including by direct links thereto...". So it's true that to comply, google would have had to censor the links from their search results, but i find the way it's written quite
156:
Well, I was working on this article as the events were going down, and I was trying to keep up on the news sites regarding the matter, but, if my memory serves me right, not much was made about
Knowledge (XXG) and the number (other than articles like "typing it in every editable place on the net"
454:
must live in parallel universes. There, an administrator keeps removing even links to the original post of the master key on pastebin, despite the fact that the pastebin link is given in article appearing in a couple of respectable computing web magazines, CNET and PC Magazine. What happened to
320:
Google, Inc. has not purchased a license to the number to which you refer nor to any other portion of your copyrighted works. It would be therefore be illegal to add this number or any other portion of the said works to our software. Hence any filtering of results as mentioned in your demand is
170:
There indeed was some turmoil, and lack of understanding by multiple people, but little by reputable sources, and just as little that stated more than "wikipedia has now taken to banning they key as well". I don't consider it really important, but if we can find one accurate source that states
427:
with a decent program should not be a problem. They will easily fit even if you include the websafe palette. (Of course if you convert it to GIF you will technically have to crossreference the colour in the image with palette colour to get the correct bytes
363:
Someone seems to have the various key types confused and called (or put it into the article in a way that would suggest it was) a volume unique key a processing key, which are totally different things. Anyway I've corrected it and put some references.
272:
Well, they did send a cease and desist notice to Google telling them to stop returning search results, but I think we would all be open to a new wording as long as it is neutral, factual, and grammatically correct.Ā :-) What do you suggest?
135:
Did
Knowledge (XXG)'s reaction get any major news coverage? Probably a few bloggers, but I think most of the attention was on other sites, rather than on Knowledge (XXG) specifically. Could be mistaken, I'm going from memory, there. ā
93:
talk page. I can only assume that someone created an article with a title that has now been changed to a redirect and tried to create a whole new article. My apologies - I would have never tagged this particular article for deletion.
238:
This article has passed the GA noms. A suggestion for improvement would be to make the article less "Digg" centered and if possible add a section about how this has in general influenced the internet. Also feel free to seek a
343:
Was there any actual record of its use? The only source is a blog, and it doesn't seem to have made it, for it misidentifies the purpose of the +C0. Also, some of the claims attributed to that source are not present.
161:
I remember reading somewhere that in the author's opinion, we were "doing it right" by allowing it to be posted with critical analysis and discussion, etc. But maybe I can't recall correctly. --
642:
277:
722:
306:
165:
738:
praising those websites that complied with their requests as acting in a "responsible manner", warning that "legal and technical tools" were adapting to the situation.
523:
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
257:
I edited out the fact that google was asked to remove the key from the search results, because I thought it wasn't written in the letter. It is actually written, as
107:
69:
64:
59:
579:
and appear to be genuine. Obviously "processing keys for versions past 10 have not yet been released" needs to be updated, but I'm not sure whether it's best to
684:
In
Archive 1, the prime factors are given as 2*5*19*12043*216493*836256503069278983442067. I have verified this in Mathematica. I will add it to the article.
451:
800:
96:
If you check the page's history, it looks like I've made no edits to it, so I think my theory of someone creating a separate article is correct. --
749:
129:
47:
17:
614:
325:
297:
184:
171:
something constructive about it, without giving the wikipedia case "undue weight" in the article, then i think we could use that. --
527:
221:
262:
biasedĀ : "the AACS LA sent a DMCA notice to Google, demanding that Google stop returning any results for searches for the key".
772:
547:
607:
Easy. Remove the reference. If you don't mention new keys haven't been found, you don't ever have to update that statement.
714:
Don't know if this is relevant enough to mention in the article, though it's a nice example of 'publishing the key but not
199:
Has anything recent regarding this incident occured? Has the AACS recalled anything since the 45 5F code was released?
180:
38:
282:"...demanding that Google stop returning search results which included or directly linked to the key," perhaps? ā
801:
https://web.archive.org/20090505165752/http://www.shopfloor.org:80/2007/05/03/intellectual-property-dust-up-digg/
753:
329:
618:
863:
757:
745:
732:
693:
678:
659:
622:
610:
601:
565:
510:
490:
472:
437:
418:
392:
373:
353:
333:
266:
247:
228:
203:
151:
114:
100:
804:
729:
383:
Should this be in the lead along with AACS LA's response? It seems sensible and could be quite short. -
263:
576:
200:
855:
835:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
292:
146:
487:
414:
409:
color represents three bytes - red, green and blue...so long as you don't convert it to JPEG or GIF!
460:
456:
689:
433:
349:
709:
561:
506:
468:
388:
111:
593:
836:
782:
726:
674:
528:
http://www.forbes.com/technology/2007/05/02/digital-rights-management-tech-cx_ag_0502digg.html
501:
remove the sources per ELNEVER, as he did, then you wouldn't be able to include any key here.
97:
217:
status. The edit war seems to have died, and the article is well-sourced and well-written.
851:
369:
284:
138:
89:
843:
790:
705:
597:
479:
410:
218:
176:
240:
214:
685:
655:
429:
345:
842:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
557:
502:
464:
384:
670:
126:
303:
274:
258:
162:
365:
244:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
172:
495:
I don't know or care because it's a non-binding essay, but the admin removes
650:
787:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
805:
http://www.shopfloor.org/2007/05/03/intellectual-property-dust-up-digg/
830:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
540:
125:
there is no mention of this in the article, might be worthy of note
795:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
589:
Quote the full list of keys in the
Knowledge (XXG) article itself
704:
The bytes from the key are used as red-zone values by the Linux
533:
424:
25:
810:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
643:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates/Free Speech Flag
771:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
583:
Just mention the fact that the new keys have been found,
398:
Flag colors represent fifteen bytes, not three as stated
776:
498:
496:
478:
How does WP:KEYSPAM support having the link exactly? --
423:
Since the flag only has 6 colours, converting it to
316:
An obvious response to this crank cease and desist:
575:Processing keys up to MKB v25 have been published
121:Knowledge (XXG)'s response to key posting as spam
120:
108:09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0
742:that's what the commie tell Hker everyday..
8:
452:High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection
669:Kenneth, what are the prime factors? ā
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
630:Free Speech Flag for Featured Picture
550:on 2011-06-19 22:30:18, 404 Not Found
543:on 2011-03-22 17:37:45, 404 Not Found
536:on 2011-03-17 10:12:51, 404 Not Found
7:
18:Talk:AACS encryption key controversy
24:
775:. Please take a moment to review
721:It appears to have been added by
586:Provide that link to the keys, or
821:
213:I've nominated this article for
29:
773:AACS encryption key controversy
548:AACS encryption key controversy
106:Looks like it happened over at
660:18:23, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
602:21:07, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
511:05:29, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
491:04:36, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
473:03:56, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
1:
354:02:42, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
307:14:43, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
298:08:55, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
248:17:45, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
185:15:12, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
166:14:43, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
152:08:57, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
864:05:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
679:05:30, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
334:20:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
278:13:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
267:18:47, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
758:19:41, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
733:22:00, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
623:16:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
374:11:31, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
302:Yeah... that could work. --
229:20:09, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
879:
793:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
768:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
694:06:57, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
438:00:16, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
566:22:30, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
419:19:50, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
393:07:37, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
379:Digg response to "revolt"
243:for further suggestions.
204:11:54, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
130:15:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
115:05:02, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
101:03:36, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
764:External links modified
253:Google cease and desist
638:for Featured Picture.
402:10:48 EST, 31/01/2010
323:
318:
42:of past discussions.
818:to let others know.
779:. If necessary, add
814:parameter below to
725:on 8th May, 2007.
700:Use in Linux kernel
634:I've nominated the
446:Parallel universes?
157:type of things). I
85:Speedy deletion tag
571:MKB v25 keys found
359:Key type confusion
862:
748:comment added by
641:Discussion is at
613:comment added by
450:This article and
82:
81:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
870:
858:
857:Talk to my owner
853:
828:
825:
824:
794:
786:
760:
636:Free Speech Flag
625:
485:
296:
289:
226:
150:
143:
78:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
878:
877:
873:
872:
871:
869:
868:
867:
861:
856:
826:
822:
788:
780:
766:
750:123.203.118.107
743:
740:
702:
667:
632:
608:
573:
521:
483:
448:
400:
381:
361:
341:
285:
283:
264:129.199.159.122
255:
236:
222:
211:
197:
139:
137:
123:
87:
74:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
876:
874:
854:
848:
847:
840:
808:
807:
799:Added archive
765:
762:
739:
736:
706:SLAB allocator
701:
698:
697:
696:
666:
663:
631:
628:
627:
626:
591:
590:
587:
584:
572:
569:
554:
553:
552:
551:
544:
537:
520:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
447:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
399:
396:
380:
377:
360:
357:
340:
337:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
254:
251:
235:
232:
210:
207:
201:69.182.119.221
196:
193:
192:
191:
190:
189:
188:
187:
122:
119:
118:
117:
86:
83:
80:
79:
72:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
875:
866:
865:
859:
852:
845:
841:
838:
834:
833:
832:
831:
819:
817:
813:
806:
802:
798:
797:
796:
792:
784:
778:
774:
769:
763:
761:
759:
755:
751:
747:
737:
735:
734:
731:
728:
724:
719:
717:
712:
710:
707:
699:
695:
691:
687:
683:
682:
681:
680:
676:
672:
664:
662:
661:
657:
653:
652:
646:
644:
639:
637:
629:
624:
620:
616:
615:206.180.38.20
612:
606:
605:
604:
603:
599:
595:
588:
585:
582:
581:
580:
578:
570:
568:
567:
563:
559:
549:
545:
542:
538:
535:
531:
530:
529:
526:
525:
524:
518:
512:
508:
504:
499:
497:
494:
493:
492:
489:
486:
482:
477:
476:
475:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
453:
445:
439:
435:
431:
426:
422:
421:
420:
416:
412:
408:
405:
404:
403:
397:
395:
394:
390:
386:
378:
376:
375:
371:
367:
358:
356:
355:
351:
347:
338:
336:
335:
331:
327:
326:121.79.12.138
322:
317:
308:
305:
301:
300:
299:
294:
290:
288:
281:
280:
279:
276:
271:
270:
269:
268:
265:
260:
252:
250:
249:
246:
242:
233:
231:
230:
227:
225:
220:
216:
209:GA nomination
208:
206:
205:
202:
194:
186:
182:
178:
174:
169:
168:
167:
164:
160:
155:
154:
153:
148:
144:
142:
134:
133:
132:
131:
128:
116:
113:
112:Bryan Derksen
109:
105:
104:
103:
102:
99:
94:
91:
84:
77:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
849:
829:
820:
815:
811:
809:
770:
767:
744:ā Preceding
741:
720:
715:
713:
703:
668:
649:
647:
640:
635:
633:
609:ā Preceding
592:
574:
555:
522:
480:
449:
406:
401:
382:
362:
342:
324:
319:
315:
286:
256:
237:
223:
215:good article
212:
198:
158:
140:
124:
98:DearPrudence
95:
88:
75:
43:
37:
723:this commit
287:Luna Santin
241:peer review
141:Luna Santin
110:. Strange.
90:W1k13rh3nry
36:This is an
665:by the way
461:WP:ELNEVER
457:WP:KEYSPAM
411:SteveBaker
844:this tool
837:this tool
686:SamuelRiv
519:Dead link
430:Nil Einne
346:Jedravent
339:That flag
234:GA Passed
76:ArchiveĀ 4
70:ArchiveĀ 3
65:ArchiveĀ 2
60:ArchiveĀ 1
850:Cheers.ā
783:cbignore
746:unsigned
611:unsigned
558:JeffGBot
503:Tijfo098
465:Tijfo098
385:BalthCat
181:contribs
860::Online
812:checked
777:my edit
671:Tamfang
463:here??
127:Tmursch
39:archive
791:nobots
718:key'.
708:; see
541:HD DVD
488:(talk)
366:Serrin
245:Tarret
195:Update
594:Gkmac
484:cobra
481:Cyber
304:Ali'i
275:Ali'i
259:Ali'i
224:juice
219:Mango
173:TheDJ
163:Ali'i
159:think
16:<
816:true
754:talk
690:talk
675:talk
656:talk
651:Cirt
619:talk
598:talk
577:here
562:talk
534:Digg
507:talk
469:talk
459:and
434:talk
415:talk
407:each
389:talk
370:talk
350:talk
330:talk
293:talk
177:talk
147:talk
803:to
716:qua
546:In
539:In
532:In
425:GIF
789:{{
785:}}
781:{{
756:)
711:.
692:)
677:)
658:)
648:ā
645:.
621:)
600:)
564:)
556:--
509:)
471:)
436:)
417:)
391:)
372:)
352:)
344:--
332:)
273:--
183:)
179:ā¢
846:.
839:.
827:Y
752:(
730:T
727:P
688:(
673:(
654:(
617:(
596:(
560:(
505:(
467:(
432:(
413:(
387:(
368:(
348:(
328:(
295:)
291:(
175:(
149:)
145:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.