Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Amazing China

Source 📝

233: 171: 361:
quite obvious, I think, that the Party, having produced this film to show how amazing China supposedly is, wouldn't let the media it controls criticise it. I do, therefore, think that all _significant_ viewpoints are represented. If you still disagree, please let us know what we are missing out on.On a sidenote, the POVs you discuss are, I think, not pro-China and anti-China, but either pro-CCP and anti-CCP or, even more correctly, pro-"Amazing China" and anti-"Amazing China".
223: 199: 151: 81: 53: 295: 22: 91: 360:
It seems to me that the majority's view of the film is quite well represented in the article. Seeing as (legal) Mainland news sources are CCP controlled, it would seem odd to me to report them with the same weight as slightly less biased sources (HK and non-China newspapers, for instance). It is
460: 337:
to this article on the basis of the fact that this article only contains those critical anti-China POVs while deliberately ignoring those pro-China POVs, which is nothing but a violation of
180: 67: 304: 209: 160: 63: 465: 455: 279: 440: 435: 430: 425: 450: 285: 346: 470: 255: 445: 109: 420: 33: 246: 204: 121: 113: 254:
related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
117: 104: 58: 343:
Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represent all significant viewpoints
350: 39: 21: 170: 382: 362: 338: 222: 198: 386: 366: 400: 390: 331: 414: 238: 108:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can 96: 294: 228: 86: 80: 52: 150: 125: 405: 399:- Summoned by bot. Depends on the weight of the coverage and sources. 370: 354: 251: 381:
Is undue weight given to negative views/opinions of the film?
15: 293: 169: 149: 461:
Stub-Class China-related articles of Unknown-importance
250:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 284:This article has not yet received a rating on the 124:. To improve this article, please refer to the 8: 466:Unknown-importance Chinese cinema articles 193: 120:. To use this banner, please refer to the 47: 19: 456:Unknown-importance China-related articles 195: 49: 342: 441:Documentary films task force articles 436:Stub-Class Documentary films articles 7: 244:This article is within the scope of 102:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 431:Chinese cinema task force articles 426:Stub-Class Chinese cinema articles 14: 451:Stub-Class China-related articles 264:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject China 178:This article is supported by the 158:This article is supported by the 231: 221: 197: 134:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Film 118:regional and topical task forces 89: 79: 51: 20: 376: 1: 302:This article is supported by 258:and see a list of open tasks. 305:the Chinese cinema workgroup 181:Documentary films task force 487: 471:WikiProject China articles 355:10:26, 22 April 2018 (UTC) 286:project's importance scale 267:Template:WikiProject China 446:WikiProject Film articles 406:00:52, 15 June 2018 (UTC) 377:RfC on 'undue weight' tag 301: 283: 216: 177: 161:Chinese cinema task force 157: 137:Template:WikiProject Film 74: 46: 421:Stub-Class film articles 391:15:13, 9 June 2018 (UTC) 371:10:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC) 298: 270:China-related articles 174: 154: 28:This article is rated 327:I added the template 297: 173: 153: 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 110:join the discussion 299: 175: 155: 34:content assessment 320: 319: 316: 315: 312: 311: 247:WikiProject China 192: 191: 188: 187: 112:and see lists of 478: 403: 336: 330: 272: 271: 268: 265: 262: 241: 236: 235: 234: 225: 218: 217: 212: 201: 194: 142: 141: 138: 135: 132: 105:WikiProject Film 99: 94: 93: 92: 83: 76: 75: 70: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 486: 485: 481: 480: 479: 477: 476: 475: 411: 410: 401: 379: 347:117.136.106.139 334: 328: 325: 269: 266: 263: 260: 259: 237: 232: 230: 207: 139: 136: 133: 130: 129: 95: 90: 88: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 484: 482: 474: 473: 468: 463: 458: 453: 448: 443: 438: 433: 428: 423: 413: 412: 409: 408: 378: 375: 374: 373: 324: 321: 318: 317: 314: 313: 310: 309: 300: 290: 289: 282: 276: 275: 273: 256:the discussion 243: 242: 226: 214: 213: 202: 190: 189: 186: 185: 176: 166: 165: 156: 146: 145: 143: 101: 100: 84: 72: 71: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 483: 472: 469: 467: 464: 462: 459: 457: 454: 452: 449: 447: 444: 442: 439: 437: 434: 432: 429: 427: 424: 422: 419: 418: 416: 407: 404: 398: 395: 394: 393: 392: 388: 384: 372: 368: 364: 359: 358: 357: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 333: 322: 307: 306: 296: 292: 291: 287: 281: 278: 277: 274: 257: 253: 249: 248: 240: 229: 227: 224: 220: 219: 215: 211: 206: 203: 200: 196: 183: 182: 172: 168: 167: 163: 162: 152: 148: 147: 144: 140:film articles 127: 123: 122:documentation 119: 115: 111: 107: 106: 98: 87: 85: 82: 78: 77: 73: 69: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 396: 380: 341:that states 326: 323:Undue weight 303: 245: 239:China portal 179: 159: 103: 40:WikiProjects 97:Film portal 68:Documentary 415:Categories 402:Meatsgains 126:guidelines 114:open tasks 30:Stub-class 339:WP:UNDUE 397:Comment 64:Chinese 383:Doanri 363:Doanri 210:Cinema 36:scale. 332:undue 261:China 252:China 205:China 387:talk 367:talk 351:talk 345:. -- 131:Film 116:and 59:Film 280:??? 417:: 389:) 369:) 353:) 335:}} 329:{{ 208:: 66:/ 62:: 385:( 365:( 349:( 308:. 288:. 184:. 164:. 128:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Film
Chinese
Documentary
WikiProject icon
Film portal
WikiProject Film
join the discussion
open tasks
regional and topical task forces
documentation
guidelines
Taskforce icon
Chinese cinema task force
Taskforce icon
Documentary films task force
WikiProject icon
China
Cinema
WikiProject icon
China portal
WikiProject China
China
the discussion
???
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.