449:
431:
400:
376:
348:
305:
291:
277:
207:
42:
473:
334:
241:
602:
There is inconsistency throughout the article in whether the
English measurement is given first and the metric in parenthesis or vice versa. This is especially obvious in the "Armament" portion of the infobox. Since this is a ship from a European country, I would have expected to usually see metric
47:
126:
579:
The 69.9 vs 70 one is still there. Also, I just noticed "3,400–5,500 nautical miles (6,297–10,186 km)" - the metric equivalents shouldn't show more significant digits than the
English original figures.
122:
107:
639:
Hmm, I can't find the right MOS page for this. But in any case, it should be consistent: Annapolis has a state twice but once doesn't; Indiana is abbreviated "IN" once but "In" the other time.
52:
99:
618:, though we have no article on it) and so should use the measurements of the manufacturer. The same goes for the 6-inch (the RN's QF Mk 1) and the 4.7-inch (the EOC Pattern M) guns.
633:
Regarding the locations in the bibliography, it is generally WP style to spell U.S. states out completely, thus "Maryland" not "MD". And "Rochester" needs a state or country.
573:
There are inconsistent numbers in metric equivalents: "10-inch (254 mm)" in some places and "10 in (250 mm)" in others; "2.75 in (69.9 mm)" versus "2.75 in (70 mm)" and so on.
495:
That's good. But I think you should start a new paragraph at "The ships, much smaller than their ...", since that's a different time perspective than the preceding text.
80:
523:
What exactly happened to the two ships - the article text says "subsequently discarded" - does this mean scrapped, scuttled, used as target practice, something else?
659:
The ISBN for the
Sondhaus book should be formatted. And you should probably use either 10-digit or 13-digit form consistently (I'm fine with 10-digit; you can use
534:
However I just noticed that the infobox says "Scrapped: 2". Since that's not known for sure, is there a more generic entry such as "Retired" that can be used here?
70:
115:
17:
92:
586:
Good. However I see that the range in the infobox does not have an mi equivalent while the one in the text does. Intentional or an oversight?
175:
604:
156:
181:
75:
297:
607:
and it seems to use metric first everywhere. Is there some MILHIST convention that you are following or is this an oversight?
437:
213:
259:
233:
615:
750:
736:
720:
706:
691:
168:
746:
732:
716:
687:
489:
What was the verdict on the class's utility? What advantages or disadvantages did the smaller design have?
164:
150:
507:
Was the class's minimal use in WWI purely due to being a pre-dreadnought, or were there other factors too?
555:
There is inconsistent use between forms like "10-inch" (in the lead and infobox) and "10 in" (elsewhere).
651:
The
Crawford book isn't used in a footnote, and thus should be moved to the "Further reading" section.
702:
611:
413:
340:
221:
742:
728:
712:
683:
160:
146:
326:
697:
Thanks for reviewing the article, let me know if there's anything else that needs to be fixed.
362:
269:
217:
185:
441:
423:
229:
225:
283:
698:
561:
Okay. "Millimeter" is never spelled out - does the first use of "meter" cover that?
558:
Units should be written in full at the first use and abbreviated thereafter.
526:
The sources are unclear - presumably scrapped, but I don't know for sure.
515:
What effect if any did the class have on later
Italian battleship design?
660:
159:) 01:10, 10 July 2013 (UTC) I have started reviewing this article.
621:
Okay. But why not include the manufacturer in these descriptions?
529:
Okay. I guess "discarded" is a fitting word for this class ...
576:
Errors in the convert template coding - should be fixed now.
741:
OK, we're done and I'm passing the article, good job.
134:
103:
636:
Perhaps for prose, but not in the reference section.
510:
They were too old and weak to be front line warships.
417:and other media, where possible and appropriate.
682:If I think of anything else, I'll add it on.
422:(images are tagged and non-free content have
18:Talk:Ammiraglio di Saint Bon-class battleship
8:
30:
454:Pretty good images, considering the era
61:
33:
711:See the few further comments above.
669:The Crawford one is still ten-digit.
485:Specific comments regarding content:
7:
605:Italian battleship Leonardo da Vinci
551:Specific comments regarding style:
472:
333:
240:
24:
564:It's now spelled out in the lead.
727:Just a couple more follow-ups.
471:
447:
429:
398:
374:
371:Fair representation without bias
346:
332:
303:
289:
275:
239:
205:
603:first. I looked at GA article
184:for what the criteria are, and
1:
614:design (an earlier model of
518:Essentially none whatsoever.
448:
430:
399:
375:
347:
304:
290:
276:
206:
775:
751:03:03, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
737:12:32, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
721:01:50, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
707:15:30, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
692:11:18, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
610:The 10-inch guns were an
169:01:10, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
642:Should all be fixed now.
195:reasonably well written
188:for what they are not)
492:Added a bit on this.
411:It is illustrated by
363:neutral point of view
318:broad in its coverage
663:to easily convert).
612:Armstrong Whitworth
424:fair use rationales
395:No edit wars, etc.
255:factually accurate
442:suitable captions
270:reference section
89:
88:
766:
475:
474:
451:
450:
433:
432:
402:
401:
378:
377:
350:
349:
336:
335:
307:
306:
293:
292:
284:reliable sources
279:
278:
243:
242:
209:
208:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
774:
773:
769:
768:
767:
765:
764:
763:
666:Done for both.
438:appropriate use
360:It follows the
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
772:
770:
762:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
753:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
657:
656:
655:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
521:
520:
519:
513:
512:
511:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
282:(citations to
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
190:
189:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
771:
752:
748:
744:
743:Wasted Time R
740:
739:
738:
734:
730:
729:Wasted Time R
726:
725:
724:
723:
722:
718:
714:
713:Wasted Time R
710:
709:
708:
704:
700:
696:
695:
694:
693:
689:
685:
684:Wasted Time R
671:
670:
668:
667:
665:
664:
662:
658:
653:
652:
650:
641:
640:
638:
637:
635:
634:
632:
623:
622:
620:
619:
617:
613:
609:
608:
606:
601:
588:
587:
585:
584:
582:
581:
578:
577:
575:
574:
572:
563:
562:
560:
559:
557:
556:
554:
553:
552:
536:
535:
533:
532:
531:
530:
528:
527:
525:
524:
522:
517:
516:
514:
509:
508:
506:
497:
496:
494:
493:
491:
490:
488:
487:
486:
477:
476:
469:
466:
465:
463:
460:
453:
452:
445:
443:
439:
427:
425:
419:
418:
416:
415:
410:
404:
403:
396:
393:
392:
390:
386:
380:
379:
372:
369:
368:
366:
364:
359:
352:
351:
344:
342:
330:
328:
327:major aspects
322:
321:
319:
315:
309:
308:
301:
299:
287:
285:
273:
271:
265:
264:
262:
261:
256:
252:
245:
244:
237:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
203:
199:
198:
196:
192:
191:
187:
183:
179:
177:
173:
172:
171:
170:
166:
162:
161:Wasted Time R
158:
155:
152:
148:
147:Wasted Time R
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
681:
583:Both fixed.
550:
484:
467:
461:
435:
421:
412:
394:
388:
370:
361:
338:
324:
317:
295:
281:
267:
258:
254:
211:
201:
194:
174:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
226:word choice
104:visual edit
537:Fixed now.
260:verifiable
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
699:Parsecboy
661:this site
624:Added in.
468:Pass/Fail
353:See below
246:See below
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
616:this gun
157:contribs
76:Criteria
462:Overall
341:focused
230:fiction
202:(prose)
127:history
108:history
94:Article
672:Fixed.
589:Fixed.
414:images
389:stable
387:It is
365:policy
316:It is
253:It is
232:, and
222:layout
193:It is
178:review
654:Done.
498:Sure.
440:with
234:lists
180:(see
136:Watch
16:<
747:talk
733:talk
717:talk
703:talk
688:talk
257:and
218:lead
216:for
186:here
182:here
165:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
214:MoS
749:)
735:)
719:)
705:)
690:)
470::
464::
446::
434:b
428::
420:a
397::
391:.
373::
367:.
345::
337:b
331::
323:a
320:.
302::
298:OR
294:c
288::
280:b
274::
266:a
263:.
238::
228:,
224:,
220:,
210:b
204::
200:a
197:.
176:GA
167:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
745:(
731:(
715:(
701:(
686:(
444:)
436:(
426:)
343:)
339:(
329:)
325:(
300:)
296:(
286:)
272:)
268:(
236:)
212:(
163:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.