1314:Таким образом, уже в учебнике для первого года обучения был сформирован образ армян, как главных врагов Азербайджана и всего «тюрко-мусульманского мира». Впоследствии этот образ лишь дополнялся «фактами» из истории Азербайджана и новыми негативными эпитетами. Так, в учебнике по истории Азербайджана за 7 класс постоянно говорится о том, что «древняя Албания (т.е. по мысли авторов учебника – древний Азербайджан) «периодически подвергалась агрессии со стороны армянских правителей». И хотя в ответ «население и правители Албании в трудные времена протягивали руку помощи армянам», однако армяне платили «черной неблагодарностью» за это и в итоге «захватническая политика правителей Армении против Албании, их территориальные (уже тогда! – А.Ю.) претензии вынуждали албан» искать помощи у соседних стран. 21 При этом целью армян было распространить христианство в Албании, т.е. на территории современного Азербайджана, хотя «христианство в Албании не имело корней». Это было целенаправленная политика: «Армения под прикрытием христианства … проводила политику захвата азербайджанских земель».
1505:– Are you having a hard time picking your argumentation? You started this discussion with "statment wrongly implies", and after some back and forth, I suggested we reword per source itself mentioning the specific book 'Fatherland'. Now, you're saying "Yunus not reliable/peer-reviewed". First of all, Yunus's research is more than good enough as Yunus by profession is more than qualified (historian). And are all the sources on Knowledge peer-reviewed? You yourself added sources that aren't peer-reviewed, do you want me to show the diffs? Why are you raising the bar exponentially for Yunus whom you simply
1341:- Your last quote was irrelevant, as well as this one. Please carefully read what I wrote. Yes, Yunus talks about number of the 1990-2007 books, but the terms "bandits", "aggressors", "treacherous", and "hypocritical" from the Yunus research are referencing specifically to the "Я.Махмудлу, Р.Халилов, С.Агаев. Отечество" textbook. Thus it is not correct to say "The Azerbaijani historian Arif Yunus has stated that various Azerbaijani school textbooks label Armenians with epithets such as "bandits", "aggressors", "treacherous", and "hypocritical".".
2245:- because our discussion is about whether post stamp illustration seemingly depicting ethnic Armenians in the area were being as a virus in need of "eradicating", or it is claimed that post stamp illustration depicting ethnic Armenians in the area were being as a virus in need of "eradicating". The fact that post stamp was rejected by Universal Postal Union does not contribute to that discussion. Not also that, but also the panArmenian source you provided is low quality propaganda site, which is
252:
1483:-eh, you addressed nothing, but I'm not planning to go into the details unless you prove me that source you referring to is reliable published and peer reviewed. As far as I'm concerned Yunus's research, which we were discussing here, is neither reliable published nor peer reviewed, which means use of it as a source for Knowledge is unacceptable. So he question is are you convinced, or you still want me to take this obvious case to the RSN?
530:
397:
102:
376:
81:
198:
2220:- Not really, you don't seem to understand that "allegation" (your wording) doesn't represent the sources. I presented 3 more third party sources which support the current wording and beyond. Seem like your argumentation keeps changing to"non reliable" now based on your original research. These third party sources are perfectly fine for reporting about the rejected Armenophobic stamp, and I will repeat that it got rejected by
177:
1672:”. Difference is that source does not say that illustration depicts specialist standing over an Azerbaijan map and fumigating the area of Nagorno-Karabakh, rather source says that illustration depicts a disinfection specialist standing over a map of Azerbaijan and fumigating the area of Nagorno-Karabakh, which some people online believe that ethnic Armenians in the area were being depicted as a virus in need of “eradicating”.
1915:(Rachael Rose Luckey is a Transgender and Housing Rights Activist, living in Los Angeles. As President of the Rampart Village Neighborhood Council, she is one of only a couple of dozen openly transgender elected public officials in the country. In December 2020, Rachael Rose announced her run for Los Angeles City Council District 13 in the municipal elections in 2022. For more information go to www.rachaelroseforla.com.)
1347:- again, please read carefully what I wrote. I do not say that Yunus work is outdated, what I say that his work is applicable only to books printed 1990-2007. Implying that research, which reviewed books from specific date range, is also applicable to the books printed like 20 years later is ORIGINAL research. So ONUS is on the editors who want to link that research to the books which were printed after the research.
476:
208:
953:
Minorities (ACFC) for example noted “a persistent public narrative surrounding the conflict over
Nagorno-Karabakh identifying variably Armenia or Armenians as ‘the enemy’ and openly promulgating hate messages”.34 According to other sources, there is a conflict-ridden domestic political discourse35 and Azerbaijan’s leadership, education system and media are very prolific in their denigration of Armenians. (page 17)
1253:- It is not a case of what you believe what Yunus wrote about. This "При этом, в отношении армян также используются все возможные негативные эпитеты («бандиты», «агрессоры», «коварные», «лицемерные» и т.д.)." is specifically cited to the "Отчесво". It is clear from the citation "17" that written right after that paragraph. You can check it by yourself on the page 7. Said that, I expect you to self-revert please.
1838:
article indicating an opinion piece, please show me if I missed. Seems like your disagreement revolves around the "claim" part, which I already addressed - saying "seemingly" (current wording) paraphrases it just fine and doesn't copy word for word. The new source further supports reference to
Armenians. Your suggestion attributes to "allegation" which is just a watered down version and casts undue doubt.
1788:“There is no double interpretation to the message behind what is pictured on the postcard and stamp -- state-approved ethnic cleansing of Nagorno-Karabakh’s ethnic Armenian majority, not the eradication of a virus. This “commemorative” stamp -- this postal atrocity -- attempts to put a happy face on an evil, a morally bereft assault on innocent civilians merely because they are Armenian. “
308:
287:
50:
21:
1988:"It is evident, however, that these incidents are not just confined to the context of war or indeed post war tension. In January 2021, Azerbaijan released a commemorative postal stamp to celebrate the Nagorno-Karabakh war. The images depict Azerbaijani military personal alongside disinfection specialists fumigating the area of Nagorno-Karabakh.
2277:"The postage stamps were accompanied with illustration of a disinfection specialist standing over an Azerbaijan map and fumigating the Nagorno-Karabakh area. This provoked fury on social media, with claims that ethnic Armenians in the region are depicted as a virus that must be "eradicated," as well as accusations of anti-Armenian sentiment."
2296:- Actually you're the only person here believing that 3 third party sources reporting on this hateful stamp aren't RS and you prefer the wording from only one source while ignoring the 3 others supporting current wording and beyond. And you're the only one claiming "non RS". So please, follow your own advice.
2074:
The bottom line is that the illustration accompanying the stamps shows a disinfection specialist standing over a map of
Azerbaijan and fumigating the area of Nagorno-Karabakh. All other stuff is allegations. It is unacceptable to write allegations as statement of the fact. The version that I proposed
1117:
I reviewed Yunus' study and can say that he conducted analysis that explains processes in the region and
Azerbaijan in the late 1990s and early 2000s, as well as how they influenced Azerbaijani school textbooks. So, if we are going to include material from Yunus' study to the article, we should do it
651:
article, and guess what? it is also refers only to the words of the
Petrosyan. Which I am highly skeptical of, claim of one person who provides no evidence to back up his words, are highly dubious in the absence of any other evidence of alleged "shelling." While his claims might have enough weight to
1926:
The postage stamps were accompanied with illustration of a disinfection specialist standing over an
Azerbaijan map and fumigating the Nagorno-Karabakh area. This provoked fury on social media, with claims that ethnic Armenians in the region are depicted as a virus that must be "eradicated," as well
1847:
Listen, I'm not here to entertain your OR, so please keep it out of this discussion. What you deem as "hysteria" sources clearly deem as something else. Azermarka "unless officially admit" has nothing to do with what sources say, what kind of argumentation is this? The postal stamp even got rejected
1837:
Where does it actually say the article is an OPED? CityWatch is a news website with journalistic standards, and your unexplained characterization of it as "mostly bullshit propaganda sources" is uncalled for, especially since you'd have a hard time proving this statement. I don't see anything in the
1757:
The postage stamps were accompanied with illustration of a disinfection specialist standing over an
Azerbaijan map and fumigating the Nagorno-Karabakh area. This provoked fury on social media, with allegations that ethnic Armenians in the region are depicted as a virus that must be "eradicated," as
1576:
I'm not repeating myself regarding historian Yunus, and verifiability has nothing to do with your "unreliable" claims. Again you're the only one claiming "unreliable" which is especially odd for a historian like Yunus. So that's a you problem as you claim this with nothing to back up your statement.
1202:
In subsequent sections of the textbook, the authors pay more and more attention to
Armenians, who are beginning to be perceived as "the main infidels in black robes." At the same time, all possible negative epithets are also used in relation to the Armenians. (“bandits”, “aggressors”, “treacherous”,
1113:
The statement wrongly implies that Yunus attributed that epithets to all
Azerbaijani school textbooks, where in reality Yunus clearly wrote that mentioned epithets are from the "Я.Махмудлу, Р.Халилов, С.Агаев. Отечество" textbook. SO claim in the article is synth and possibly BLP violation, as it is
1023:
Why don't you paraphrase based on the sources you brought, rather than trying to fit that statement into the source? Also, as I highlighted above, that statement should be attributed to the reports you linked, and "for instance" wont address the synth. Based on what you claim that this case is "wide
972:
Sorry, but those do not support the claim of "media coverage of some statements made by
Azerbaijani public figures and statesmen which demonstrate intolerance." It is more like a claim which made based on the personal conclusion of the reader. Why don't you use sources you found to write attributed
844:
I suggested putting a cn tag on the specific sentence until we find a source. The next sentence is sourced (it can stay as an independent sentence if needed btw) and you haven't unanswered what part of his Armenophobic comment is exactly "cherry-picked"? Keep in mind you don't have consensus and if
827:
I removed the material because the first part of it is original research, and rest is irrelevant without first part. Also, the rest needs an independent review by RS, otherwise it is just editors picking and choosing quotes from an speech of the living person to highlight. The burden to demonstrate
1389:
You should really stop asking others to "read carefully" when there is a clear disagreement with you. You have been asked for 10th time to provide a source that states Yunus research is outdated. That's clearly not the case. Why do you assume that all of these Armenophobic books have miraculously
1662:
1) Rewording does not mean that one can use his imagination to write original research, and yes it is important correctly reflect what source states, even if you pharapharisn it. The source does not claim that specialist standing over an Azerbaijan map and fumigating the area of Nagorno-Karabakh
1558:
Zani, are you going to answer simple question - can you or can you not prove that Yunus's research is reliably published? I am asking because I tried to find answer to that question on my own, but I did not find any evidences that Yunus's research is reliable published. Let me remind you that the
952:
Other sources confirm recurrent hate speech towards Armenians, which is connected with the conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh, the frequent ceasefire violations at the contact line and the resulting deaths and injuries. The Advisory Committee of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National
873:
Does it? I could not find inline citation supporting "There is also wide media coverage of some statements made by Azerbaijani public figures and statesmen which demonstrate intolerance." on the pages you pointed. Can you please point exactly? As far as I concerned this claim is made based on the
1975:“We must remember that mass killings do not just happen; they are always preceded by hate speech and propaganda. Armenophobia is quite prevalent in Azerbaijan, the most graphic example being a postage stamp that pictures an exterminator standing in Azerbaijan and fumigating a region of Armenia.”
673:
There is also wide media coverage of some statements made by Azerbaijani public figures and statesmen which demonstrate intolerance. For instance, in 2008, Allahshukur Pashazadeh, the religious leader (Grand Mufti) of the Caucasus Muslims made a statement that "falsehood and betrayal are in the
1196:
The construction of the image of the "enemy" begins already with the textbook for the fifth grade, i.e. With first year of teaching history. True, this is not yet a textbook on the history of Azerbaijan, this is “Fatherland” (“Anna Yurdu”), but written very emotionally, especially vividly when
1434:
So after I addressed everything, now a historian "isn't reliable" because "pdf"? Do you understand that we have specific templates for citing pdfs? At this point, the conversation with you is becoming very difficult, please don't say unreasonable things. If you think Yunus isn't RS take it to
1190:
However, that was where the positives ended. The fact is, as it was mentioned above, school textbooks in Azerbaijan in the conditions of the Karabakh conflict were called upon to “educate patriots who can separate “their own” from “others” and are ready, if necessary, to take part in the next
990:
Sorry, but you're probably having a misunderstanding about paraphrasing. You see I have to repeat again that on Knowledge, we do not copy sources word for word. The sourced quotes provided convey the meaning of the statement in question. I'm afraid I cannot explain this any better other than
1372:
noted that the construction of the image of Armenians as the "enemy" in Azerbaijani schools begins already with a textbook for the fifth grade, i.e. from the first year of teaching history. In the same textbook, titled "Fatherland", Armenians are labelled with epithets such as "bandits",
2021:
1. You really should stop repeating that the Universal Postal Union rejected the stamp. That has nothing to do with our discussion and adds no weight to your argument. P.S. Although it is still irrelevant to our discussion, there is not a word about the stamp being rejected because it
1114:
wrongly attributes information to Yunus that he never stated. Moreover, Yunus talks about school textbooks approximately from 1992-2007 and today is almost year 2023, which means that his research is now outdated and can not be referred as something that is ongoing currently.
1247:- Prove what? That Yunus work is talking about 1990s-2000s text books, where today is 2022, ergo the research can be implied only to the textbooks from that period, but not to present time text books? What else common sense obvious things shall I prove? Thas earth is round?
1842:
those are only claims and online hysteria, I do not think that you will go anywhere with that. There is a postal stamp and there are reactions to it, so unless Azermarka will officially admit that this was the idea of stamp - there is no way you turning this claims into
1420:
published source. It is PDF file of the research done by Yunus, which was neither peer reviewed nor reliable published. That is original research and thus unacceptable. It cannot be used in Knowledge, especially when it comes to interpretation or analysis by Editors.
2214:. There is difference between constructive arguments and personal opinions. The above are personal opinions that can’t serve as constructive arguments, because they are not explained to the opponent in a logical manner and leave the opponent in a gaslighted state.
1024:
media coverage"? After all search I did, I found Alllahshukurs statement only on today.az, is it wide media coverage? The point is that it is not on us to judge whether it is "wide media coverage" or not. That should be analyzed and stated by the reliable source.
1132:
I added "various" so it now cannot be interperted as referring to every single school textbook. Yunus is detailing various different textbooks at multiple grades, not just that one in particular. Do you have any sources proving that the research is now outdated?
1814:- no, that OPED published on barely known newspaper by the unknown authors is not suitable for Knowledge. I did search for better sources beforehand, by the way, and did not find any respected source writing about that case, mostly bullshit propaganda sources.
1338:
I explained to you above and quoted the actual text directly from the source. I'm not planning to repeat myself; Yunus talks about books (direct quote) and bring "Fatherland" as an example. Later, he even talks about a 7th grade book aside from the 5th grade
1658:
FYI: I will ignore ridiculous assertion type questions like: "are you denying that beheading of Armenians by Azeris happened during the 2020 War?", which has no relation to what I wrote here. So please do not spent your time writing them and stick to the
880:
This is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member
2071:, which adds to the source's questionability. Moreover, article is written by someone called "Lewis Read", there is no information about the author on their site or on Google. I don't understand how you want to use that to support statement of the fact.
1669:
The illustration accompanying the stamps shows a disinfection specialist standing over a map of Azerbaijan and fumigating the area of Nagorno-Karabakh — leading many to claim that ethnic Armenians in the area were being depicted as a virus in need of
625:
However, what they say it not a evidence that Tigranakert was shelled, neither of them were there to claim that what they said is eyewitness. I searched other sources, and all of them refers to the Hamlet Petrosyan, without providing any evidences
2048:
content provider, which is reliable for statements attributed to that editor or author, but is rarely reliable for statements of fact. Also, the quote from it supports the version which I had proposed, so I'm not sure why you mixed it with our
1167:
if we are going to include material from Yunus' study to the article, we should do it properly, rather than merely picking a few words from it. We should do it in an encyclopedic manner, since Knowledge is an encyclopedia, not a vilification
688:
This part, combined with above sentence is actually SYTH. Also as per BLP it is not OK to cherry pick some words from what person said in order to imply something not stated in the article, and it is not related to media at all. Thoughts ?
759:, Since you reverted that edit also, I am interested to hear what consensus should I reach for removal of the content, which is partially original research and partially cherry picking of the words of living person and all together
1361:
Yes, Yunus talks about number of the 1990-2007 books, but the terms "bandits", "aggressors", "treacherous", and "hypocritical" from the Yunus research are referencing specifically to the "Я.Махмудлу, Р.Халилов, С.Агаев. Отечество"
786:. What exactly is "cherry picked" here? Are you saying there is a scenario where his disgusting words are somehow justified and that it isn't included in the article? What "cherry-picking" you're talking about, I'm curious.
1458:. You don't wave around "outdated/agematters" if you have nothing to back up your statement, what? You really need to stop assuming all of the Armenophobic books have miraculously disappeared from Az schools if you have no
1244:
What? 2000s was 20 years ago, how exactly it's "outdated"? What sources describe Yunus, a historian by profession, research as "outdated"? That's on you to prove, not anyone else. And please don't answer a question with a
1118:
properly, rather than merely picking a few words from it. We should do it in an encyclopedic manner, since Knowledge is an encyclopedia, not a vilification platform. I going to remove that statement for now. Any thoughts?
1450:" (direct quote). And btw, you were asked to demonstrate this many times since you already claimed "outdated" without grasping the guideline. You need to prove how a 14yr old research is exactly "outdated" by showing new
1154:
clearly links "bandits", "aggressors", "treacherous", and "hypocritical" to the one specific book "Я.Махмудлу, Р.Халилов, С.Агаев. Отечество, с. 10". We cannot attribute that epithets to all or various Azerbaijani school
1015:
of published material is not the same thing Zani. For example, there is no mention of "wide media coverage"; there information about the linkage to Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and political situation, but statement
1411:
Nevertheless, Knowledge articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. After doing research on the source I came into conclusion that this
1992:
to ethnic cleansing is deeply unsettling. According to Azerbaijan, the images celebrate the nation’s fight against Covid-19. Given Aliyev himself described the conflict as “driving Armenians away like dogs”,
1161:- Do you have any sources poving that the research is not outdated? School text books are updated regularly, Yunus work is about 1990s-2000s, today is 2022. There is even no text book called "Отчесво" in the
1042:
Other sources confirm recurrent hate speech towards Armenians, which is connected with the conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh, the frequent ceasefire violations at the contact line and the resulting deaths and
1499:– this kind of comment summarizes your subpar understanding of policies and constantly repeating "outdated/agematters" for a mere 14yr old research without even providing a newer source that challenges it.
948:
Political leaders, educational institutions and media have continued using hate speech against Armenians; an entire generation of Azerbaijanis has now grown up listening to this hateful rhetoric. (page
2314:
you why "thrid party sources" you brought can not be used for statement of fact, and I am not going to repeat myself. If you still believe that those sources are fine - you should take them to RSN, as
31:
358:
1404:
Your proposal continues to incorrectly imply that Yunus' 14-year-old research is applicable to current textbooks. That is unsupported claim, and it is unacceptable, because this is the case when
1039:
Political leaders, educational institutions and media have continued using hate speech against Armenians; an entire generation of Azerbaijanis has now grown up listening to this hateful rhetoric.
1752:- The source should not be misinterpreted as a result of paraphrasing. WP:OR should also be followed, thus considering your argument, I paraphrased it accurately, and this is what I agree to:
1408:, and no, it is not me who has the onus to prove it, onus it on you, since it is you who claim that research on the text books from 1990-2007 is also applicable to the all future text books.
1943:
The new source that you find is opinion piece / OPED. There are only 3 paragraphs about the stamp, and the rest story written by the Rachael Rose Luckey about herself. Here are some quotes:
1869:
The new source that you find is opinion piece / OPED. There are only 3 paragraphs about the stamp, and the rest story written by the Rachael Rose Luckey about herself. Here are some quotes:
2246:
495:
614:
states that Hamlet Petrosyan asserted that city of Tigranakert was struck by Azerbaijani artillery, however neither Armenia nor Azerbaijan have released information about the site.
1109:
The Azerbaijani historian Arif Yunus has stated that Azerbaijani school textbooks label Armenians with epithets such as "bandits", "aggressors", "treacherous", and "hypocritical".
901:
For instance, in 2008, Allahshukur Pashazadeh, the religious leader (Grand Mufti) of the Caucasus Muslims made a statement that "falsehood and betrayal are in the Armenian blood."
686:
For instance, in 2008, Allahshukur Pashazadeh, the religious leader (Grand Mufti) of the Caucasus Muslims made a statement that "falsehood and betrayal are in the Armenian blood."
1750:
Again, this is completely fine paraphrased version and doesn't copy the source word for word. You really should be cautious of WP:PLAGFORM, Knowledge takes copyright seriously.
551:
546:
2056:
is not an established news outlet either. It is obvious from the article that it is an opinion piece, which is not reliable for statements of the fact. RACHAEL ROSE LUCKEY,
2211:
The Universal Postal Union has decided to not register the "Azerbaijan-2020", an anti-Armenian stamp, because they are against the conventions and ethics rules of the UPU
1448:
new information has been brought to light, new theories proposed, or vocabulary changed. In areas like politics or fashion, laws or trends may make older claims incorrect.
939:
2064:
1982:
2448:
348:
2259:
my concerns on why they are unacceptable for statement of the fact, and since it is you who to include them - BURDEN and ONUS are with you. Yet you still talk about
2053:
1781:
2067:
is unknown organization, there is no information about it in the Knowledge, or Google. There is no address, no contact number, nothing. As per their page, they are
621:, source also states that group of intellectuals and scholars published an open letter in the Los Angeles Review of Books on 16 October where they noted following:
2218:
The version that I proposed is the most accurate and reflects both what source states and reality. May I suggest that we achieve a consensus on version I proposed?
1820:- those are only claims and online hysteria, I do not think that you will go anywhere with that. There is a postal stamp and there are reactions to it, so unless
800:
Which source exactly says "There is also wide media coverage of some statements made by Azerbaijani public figures and statesmen which demonstrate intolerance" ?
1767:- I don't see the encyclopedic value in doing that, and it looks like WP:SYNTH and WP:UNDUE, but not enough for me to pursue it. So go ahead and make that edit.
1503:
Yunus's research, which we were discussing here, is neither reliable published nor peer reviewed, which means use of it as a source for Knowledge is unacceptable
1577:
Again for the last time, it's on you to prove how Yunus is unreliable if you're making such a claim, which you did above. Are we agreeing to reword per source?
1675:
2. Again, the provided source does not support that. Paraphrasing does not mean that you can write something that is not in the source. Moreover, "During the
2453:
1707:
2) I actually provided another source from Guardian, which you ignored for some reason. I'm suggesting we keep both per sources, this is what I'll agree to;
1523:
I don't appreciate your aspersions. I'm asking for a simple answer to my question: can you or can you not prove that Yunus's research is reliably published?
1780:
1) Thanks for your suggestion, but using "allegation" would be a very weak word to use, as it would mean the accusations are not justified. I found another
2433:
1881:
I am one of a handful of transgender public office holders in the country. I know what it is to be isolated. And I know it is often necessary to be strong.
1629:- doesn't need your rewording as it's paraphrased. You're copying from the source itself without paraphrasing, which isn't an improvement and is basically
269:
259:
2418:
1955:
I clearly explained why “seemingly” is original research and misinterpretation of the source, not going to repeat myself. So are we you happy with below?
1921:
I clearly explained why “seemingly” is original research and misinterpretation of the source, not going to repeat myself. So are we you happy with below?
1765:
I actually provided another source from Guardian, which you ignored for some reason. I'm suggesting we keep both per sources, this is what I'll agree to;
149:
1540:, you didn't. I'm not going to repeat myself again regarding historian Arif Yunus, and btw it's on you to prove how exactly Yunus is "unreliable" since
2274:
and match the material to the cited source. As I said, I am all right to change "allegations" to "claim", so that I will do. Here is the final version:
324:
1225:
What? 2000s was 20 years ago, how exactly it's "outdated"? What sources describe Yunus, a historian by profession, research as "outdated"? That's on
2463:
2443:
2438:
454:
444:
159:
813:
I'll try to find a source for it. In the meantime, I suggest putting a cn tag on it. But that sentence wasn't the only thing you removed was it?
735:
1727:
1641:
1323:- prove that anybody with actual authority aside from yourself (a Knowledge editor) calls Yusuf, a historian's research from 2000s, "outdated".
703:
I removing statement since there is no other opinions. There are no sources to back up that statement, which is seemingly an original research:
2280:
If you still believe that sources you linked are suitable, then I would advice you to take them to RSN and reach consensus on their inclusion.
420:
2294:
If you still believe that sources you linked are suitable, then I would advice you to take them to RSN and reach consensus on their inclusion.
2267:. I honestly can not understand your rationale, but I would advice to stop assertions and focus to the things that genuinely benefit dialogue.
2003:
Judging from the 3 more third-party sources I provided, saying "seemingly" is more than justifiable and correct as it's not just "claims" but
2468:
2423:
1345:
prove that anybody with actual authority aside from yourself (a Knowledge editor) calls Yusuf, a historian's research from 2000s, "outdated".
611:
230:
1162:
2428:
315:
292:
1286:- I explained to you above and quoted the actual text directly from the source. I'm not planning to repeat myself; Yunus talks about book
2075:
is the most accurate and reflects both what source states and reality. May I suggest that we achieve a consensus on version I proposed?
1912:
And actually, this opinion piece is kind of pre-election advertisement type of article, which is clearly visible from the the article:
1808:"allegation" are "claims" synonyms, but I don't mind if it will be either of them. I just rephrase is as you was pointing out PLAGFORM.
1290:(direct quote) and bring "Fatherland" as an example. Later, he even talks about a 7th grade book aside from the 5th grade "Fatherland":
1055:
I already suggested separating Alllahshukur's statement and removing "for instance", did you miss it? This will solve any issues left.
2413:
2458:
1050:
There is also wide media coverage of some statements made by Azerbaijani public figures and statesmen which demonstrate intolerance.
893:
There is also wide media coverage of some statements made by Azerbaijani public figures and statesmen which demonstrate intolerance.
740:
There is also wide media coverage of some statements made by Azerbaijani public figures and statesmen which demonstrate intolerance.
705:
There is also wide media coverage of some statements made by Azerbaijani public figures and statesmen which demonstrate intolerance"
680:
There is also wide media coverage of some statements made by Azerbaijani public figures and statesmen which demonstrate intolerance.
1949:
And actually, this opinion piece is kind of pre-election advertisement type of article, which is clearly visible from the article
221:
182:
1012:
994:
Allahshukur is not an official. I'll implement my suggestion regarding Allahshukur if there are no disagreements. Regards,
2395:
623:
We remind you that the site of the bombing includes archaeological sites such as the ancient Armenian city of Tigranakert.
602:
The 2,000-year-old Hellenistic Armenian city of Tigranakert was also struck by Azerbaijani artillery during this conflict.
407:
381:
125:
112:
86:
784:
633:
We can not claim that something, that we are not even sure happened, was a act of Anti-Armenian sentiment. Any thoughts?
1957:
And I clearly explained that "seemingly" is a parahprased version of the source which doesn't repeated the source text,
514:
483:
61:
584:
2388:
1700:
is completely fine paraphrased version and doesn't copy the source word for word. You really should be cautious of
510:
229:-related topics on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1712:
1676:
607:
27:
2060:
for LA City Council 2022, who literally talks about her story of life in order to earn support during elections.
563:
419:. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the
124:. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the
2391:
1874:
The Armenian-American community of Los Angeles is rightly outraged. I stand with them and share their outrage.
1052:". I'm sorry that you can't see this, it's probably a language barrier that I'm not obliged to help you learn.
1640:- are you denying that beheading of Armenians by Azeris happened during the 2020 War? It was wildly reported
1186:
as in plural, then he brings the example of "Отчесво". This is evident from the source, quotes (translated):
2315:
2224:
for being a piece of garbage that was against their ethical standards. And please familiarise yourself with
1824:
will officially admit that this was the idea of stamp - there is no way you turning this claims into facts.
1560:
652:
be kept in Tigranakert article, they are definitely undue in this case. So I'm implementing suggested edit.
2255:- We having a discussion, where you citing some low quality sources to support your point. Nevertheless, I
2340:
2301:
2233:
2221:
2012:
1962:
1860:
1849:
1799:
1739:
1648:
1582:
1549:
1514:
1471:
1395:
1328:
1234:
1213:
1060:
999:
963:
958:
Allahshukur hateful comment can be stated without "for instance" to address 'synth', as separate comment.
864:
850:
818:
791:
648:
502:
2335:
think there are issues with 3 third party sources I presented, you're free to take your concerns to RSN.
1373:"aggressors", "treacherous", and "hypocritical". Yunus and his wife were jailed for allegedly spying for
513:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
1405:
67:
2399:
2344:
2326:
2305:
2288:
2237:
2083:
2016:
1937:
1864:
1832:
1803:
1775:
1743:
1691:
1652:
1586:
1571:
1553:
1531:
1518:
1491:
1475:
1429:
1399:
1355:
1332:
1261:
1238:
1217:
1177:
1165:
of used text books. Thus, while citing his work we cannot imply that to present time. As I said above
1142:
1126:
1064:
1032:
1003:
985:
967:
933:
868:
854:
836:
822:
808:
795:
771:
750:
729:
715:
697:
660:
641:
1853:
1643:. And why are you so adamant to write word for word 'per source'? We paraphrase here not copy-paste.
1455:
1443:
2030:
1969:
49:
20:
1417:
1197:
description of confrontations with “others”, and even more so with “historical enemies” Azerbaijan.
922:
506:
2384:
2382:
323:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2331:
Your "explanation" is just a compilation of original comments which nobody concurs with here. If
1958:
1701:
1630:
1544:
started to make this claim with nothing to support it. I'd advise we agree to reword per source.
1364:- Ok? That doesn't mean you have to remove sourced information. We can easily reword per source;
1138:
725:
569:
567:
1812:
I found another source for the record, which further confirms reference to Armenians and states;
1715:, multiple videos emerged online where Azerbaijani forces have inhumanely treated the Armenian
1679:, multiple videos emerged online where Azerbaijani forces have inhumanely treated the Armenian
2336:
2297:
2271:
2264:
2229:
2225:
2008:
1856:
1795:
1735:
1644:
1578:
1545:
1537:
1510:
1467:
1391:
1324:
1230:
1209:
1056:
995:
959:
860:
846:
814:
787:
756:
618:
213:
1148:
added "various" so it now cannot be interperted as referring to every single school textbook.
411:, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to
116:, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to
943:
565:
529:
412:
760:
742:" is original research, nor the fact of the cherry picking of the words of living person.
2068:
1961:. I also provided additional source which confirms reference to Armenians, and even the
977:, which will be improvement, and move Allahshukur to the Official's Statements section?
1506:
1413:
1151:
1104:
320:
1683:." is a better start for the paragraph where below comes information about the cases.
1251:
Yunus clearly talks about books as in plural, then he brings the example of "Отчесво".
2407:
1436:
1134:
721:
1968:
Yet another third party source that says this is an outright example of hate speech
682:- this part is pure original research, as sources do not state anything like that.
475:
251:
2319:
2281:
2076:
1930:
1825:
1794:
We can easily expand using this source, further confirming reference to Armenians.
1768:
1684:
1564:
1524:
1484:
1463:
1459:
1451:
1422:
1348:
1254:
1170:
1119:
1025:
978:
926:
841:
829:
801:
764:
743:
708:
690:
653:
634:
396:
375:
101:
80:
1852:
which decided not to register the stamp as it was against their ethical standards
1563:
to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material .
197:
176:
1818:
We can easily expand using this source, further confirming reference to Armenians
1481:
So after I addressed everything, now a historian "isn't reliable" because "pdf"?
875:
2033:
is not an established news outlet. Authors don't even know where Karabakh is: "
1720:
1229:
to prove, not anyone else. And please don't answer a question with a question.
1369:
1008:
738:
you added to the article is not reliable, and neither it fixes the fact that "
491:
226:
203:
2212:
1821:
416:
121:
874:
personal conclusion of the reader , and also not attributed. For instance,
2386:
2041:
1965:
rejecting to register the stamp as it was against their ethical standards.
1784:
for the record, which further confirms reference to Armenians and states;
1383:
I'll expand this later with the example he brings of a 7th grade textbook.
1497:
eh, you addressed nothing, but I'm not planning to go into the details...
2261:
3 more third party sources which support the current wording and beyond
1509:, given how many times you switched your talking points regarding him.
1374:
1150:- You did not get it, adding "various" does not fix the issue. Yunus's
913:
and irrelevant without it. You need to find source which contains both
487:
117:
307:
286:
991:
suggesting improving your English skills if you still don't see this.
780:
1159:. Do you have any sources proving that the research is now outdated?
828:
verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material .
1223:
Do you have any sources proving that the research is not outdated?
606:
There is no evidence that Tigranakert was ever shelled during the
2057:
1855:. So it's clearly not "online hysteria" as you seem to call it.
1723:
1716:
1680:
1536:
Seems like when I kindly asked you to familiarize yourself with
2170:“Although it is still irrelevant to our discussion” - because??
628:(no photos, no satellite images, no video footage, no witnesses
570:
523:
470:
43:
15:
1466:
challenging Yunus, again please don't make me repeat myself.
883:
which clearly tells us that information should be attributed.
1722:
showing beheadings, torture and mutilations of the Armenian
1665:
seemingly depicting ethnic Armenians in the area were being
1390:
disappeared in Az schools? This is what you need to prove.
501:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
2088:“That has nothing to do with our discussion” - because??
1446:. Agematters is applied so long as you can demonstrate "
486:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
2311:
2256:
2045:
1697:
1637:
1626:
1283:
776:
876:
Third Opinion on Azerbaijan adopted on 10 October 2012
2035:
exterminator standing in Azerbaijan and fumigating a
319:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
225:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1995:
the intentions behind the stamp are all too evident
720:
I added a non-primary source for the statements. --
630:), or other parties claiming that such happened.
940:European Commission against Racism and Intolerance
2129:“and adds no weight to your argument” - because??
779:- it's literally reported by Az news media like
2253:And please familiarise yourself with WP:SEALION
1945:- Number of paragraphs doesn't change anything.
1924:
1913:
1879:
1872:
1758:well as accusations of anti-Armenian sentiment.
1755:
845:you remove sourced content you'll be reverted.
1048:The above are perfectly summarized by this - "
2270:I am going to fix the article and remove the
2007:reference of the stamp to Armenia/Armenians.
925:, which is prohibited by Knowledge policies.
578:This page has archives. Sections older than
8:
1442:And you have a very flawed understanding of
2263:, and not only that, but also assert me in
783:and you can find his quotes in the article
671:Hi all, another issue I identified is with
2310:I am not calming "non RS", I already bold
1927:as accusations of anti-Armenian sentiment.
1454:that challenges it, that's the essence of
1387:again, please read carefully what I wrote.
734:Did you even read what I wrote above? The
370:
281:
171:
75:
707:and the latter is irrelevant without it.
30:on 4 February 2013 (UTC). The result of
2449:High-importance Discrimination articles
859:First sentence is now sourced as well.
494:, or related conflicts, which has been
372:
283:
173:
77:
47:
2293:
2260:
2252:
2242:
2217:
2023:
1954:
1948:
1942:
1841:
1817:
1811:
1764:
1749:
1704:, Knowledge takes copyright seriously.
1502:
1496:
1480:
1386:
1360:
1344:
1337:
1320:
1250:
1243:
1222:
1166:
1158:
1147:
1108:
900:
892:
879:
739:
704:
685:
679:
672:
622:
601:
588:when more than 5 sections are present.
921:and links them, otherwise it will be
403:Anti-Armenian sentiment in Azerbaijan
108:Anti-Armenian sentiment in Azerbaijan
7:
333:Knowledge:WikiProject Discrimination
313:This article is within the scope of
219:This article is within the scope of
2454:WikiProject Discrimination articles
2024:was against their ethical standards
336:Template:WikiProject Discrimination
66:It is of interest to the following
2434:Mid-importance Azerbaijan articles
14:
2419:High-importance Armenian articles
582:may be automatically archived by
2318:us on you. Do you agree or not?
528:
474:
395:
374:
306:
285:
250:
239:Knowledge:WikiProject Azerbaijan
206:
196:
175:
100:
79:
48:
19:
2464:Top-importance Artsakh articles
2444:C-Class Discrimination articles
2439:WikiProject Azerbaijan articles
973:statement instead of unsourced
647:No reply yet... I also checked
449:This article has been rated as
353:This article has been rated as
264:This article has been rated as
242:Template:WikiProject Azerbaijan
154:This article has been rated as
26:This article was nominated for
1182:Yunus clearly talks about book
1:
2345:08:15, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
2327:08:07, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
2306:20:26, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
2289:20:22, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
2238:08:37, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
2084:04:19, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
2065:International Affairs Network
2017:19:15, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
1938:18:54, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
1865:17:08, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
1833:16:38, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
1804:12:36, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
1776:07:38, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
1744:00:37, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
1692:15:17, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
1653:13:39, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
1587:20:31, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
1572:20:26, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
1554:11:01, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
1532:09:10, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
1519:08:40, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
1492:16:34, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
1476:09:16, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
1430:07:51, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
1400:00:36, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
1356:15:02, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
1333:13:39, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
1262:12:54, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
1239:11:58, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
1218:11:52, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
1178:09:24, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
1143:22:43, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
1065:20:38, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
1033:20:27, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
1020:does not reflect any of that.
1004:20:01, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
986:19:52, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
968:19:23, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
934:19:08, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
869:00:29, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
855:20:03, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
837:19:45, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
823:00:34, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
809:15:06, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
796:13:39, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
772:12:57, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
751:11:21, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
730:22:41, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
515:contentious topics procedures
429:Knowledge:WikiProject Artsakh
327:and see a list of open tasks.
233:and see a list of open tasks.
134:Knowledge:WikiProject Armenia
2469:WikiProject Artsakh articles
2424:WikiProject Armenia articles
2044:page it is clear that it is
1127:13:10, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
716:13:19, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
698:15:05, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
661:15:01, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
432:Template:WikiProject Artsakh
137:Template:WikiProject Armenia
2429:C-Class Azerbaijan articles
2400:08:50, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
642:13:06, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
2485:
1990:The very obvious allegory
455:project's importance scale
316:WikiProject Discrimination
270:project's importance scale
160:project's importance scale
2414:C-Class Armenian articles
2381:This should be mentioned
1951:That's just your opinion.
1713:2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war
1677:2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war
1107:of the source supporting
1099:Indoctrination in schools
608:2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war
517:before editing this page.
448:
390:
352:
301:
263:
191:
153:
95:
74:
2459:C-Class Artsakh articles
1103:Hi all. I finally found
511:normal editorial process
423:for further information.
128:for further information.
597:Shelling of Tigranakert
498:as a contentious topic.
405:is within the scope of
339:Discrimination articles
110:is within the scope of
2222:Universal Postal Union
1963:Universal Postal Union
1929:
1917:
1883:
1876:
1850:Universal Postal Union
1760:
1726:by Azerbaijani forces.
1368:Azerbaijani historian
1203:“hypocritical”, etc.).
667:Allahshukur Pashazadeh
585:Lowercase sigmabot III
507:standards of behaviour
222:WikiProject Azerbaijan
56:This article is rated
1013:analysis or synthesis
1667:". The source says "
503:purpose of Knowledge
2392:Super Dromaeosaurus
1462:proving it / newer
408:WikiProject Artsakh
245:Azerbaijan articles
113:WikiProject Armenia
2377:Enver Pasha Street
1507:don't seem to like
484:contentious topics
62:content assessment
2272:original research
2037:region of Armenia
909:is linked to the
629:
592:
591:
557:
556:
522:
521:
469:
468:
465:
464:
461:
460:
369:
368:
365:
364:
280:
279:
276:
275:
214:Azerbaijan portal
170:
169:
166:
165:
140:Armenian articles
42:
41:
2476:
2324:
2286:
2081:
1935:
1830:
1773:
1689:
1569:
1529:
1489:
1427:
1353:
1259:
1175:
1124:
1030:
983:
931:
834:
806:
769:
748:
713:
695:
674:Armenian blood."
658:
639:
627:
587:
571:
543:
542:
532:
524:
478:
471:
437:
436:
435:Artsakh articles
433:
430:
427:
399:
392:
391:
386:
378:
371:
359:importance scale
341:
340:
337:
334:
331:
310:
303:
302:
297:
289:
282:
254:
247:
246:
243:
240:
237:
216:
211:
210:
209:
200:
193:
192:
187:
179:
172:
142:
141:
138:
135:
132:
104:
97:
96:
91:
83:
76:
59:
53:
52:
44:
23:
16:
2484:
2483:
2479:
2478:
2477:
2475:
2474:
2473:
2404:
2403:
2379:
2320:
2282:
2077:
2054:Citywatchla.com
1931:
1826:
1769:
1685:
1623:
1565:
1525:
1485:
1423:
1349:
1255:
1171:
1120:
1101:
1026:
979:
927:
830:
802:
765:
744:
709:
691:
669:
654:
635:
610:. The provided
599:
583:
572:
566:
537:
505:, any expected
434:
431:
428:
425:
424:
384:
355:High-importance
338:
335:
332:
329:
328:
296:High‑importance
295:
244:
241:
238:
235:
234:
212:
207:
205:
185:
156:High-importance
139:
136:
133:
130:
129:
90:High‑importance
89:
60:on Knowledge's
57:
12:
11:
5:
2482:
2480:
2472:
2471:
2466:
2461:
2456:
2451:
2446:
2441:
2436:
2431:
2426:
2421:
2416:
2406:
2405:
2378:
2375:
2374:
2373:
2372:
2371:
2370:
2369:
2368:
2367:
2366:
2365:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2361:
2360:
2359:
2358:
2357:
2356:
2355:
2354:
2353:
2352:
2351:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2278:
2275:
2268:
2250:
2215:
2190:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2179:
2178:
2177:
2176:
2175:
2174:
2173:
2172:
2171:
2149:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2139:
2138:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2103:
2102:
2101:
2100:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2093:
2092:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2072:
2061:
2050:
2027:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1966:
1952:
1946:
1922:
1919:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1877:
1870:
1845:
1839:
1815:
1809:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1761:
1753:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1705:
1673:
1660:
1622:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1500:
1440:
1409:
1384:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1342:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1248:
1220:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1199:
1193:
1156:
1100:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1053:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1040:
1021:
992:
956:
955:
954:
950:
903:
895:
887:
884:
857:
668:
665:
664:
663:
598:
595:
590:
589:
577:
574:
573:
568:
564:
562:
559:
558:
555:
554:
549:
539:
538:
533:
527:
520:
519:
479:
467:
466:
463:
462:
459:
458:
451:Top-importance
447:
441:
440:
438:
400:
388:
387:
385:Top‑importance
379:
367:
366:
363:
362:
351:
345:
344:
342:
330:Discrimination
325:the discussion
321:Discrimination
311:
299:
298:
293:Discrimination
290:
278:
277:
274:
273:
266:Mid-importance
262:
256:
255:
248:
231:the discussion
218:
217:
201:
189:
188:
186:Mid‑importance
180:
168:
167:
164:
163:
152:
146:
145:
143:
105:
93:
92:
84:
72:
71:
65:
54:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2481:
2470:
2467:
2465:
2462:
2460:
2457:
2455:
2452:
2450:
2447:
2445:
2442:
2440:
2437:
2435:
2432:
2430:
2427:
2425:
2422:
2420:
2417:
2415:
2412:
2411:
2409:
2402:
2401:
2397:
2393:
2389:
2387:
2385:
2383:
2376:
2346:
2342:
2338:
2334:
2330:
2329:
2328:
2325:
2323:
2322:A b r v a g l
2317:
2313:
2309:
2308:
2307:
2303:
2299:
2295:
2292:
2291:
2290:
2287:
2285:
2284:A b r v a g l
2279:
2276:
2273:
2269:
2266:
2262:
2258:
2254:
2251:
2249:for AA2 area.
2248:
2244:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2235:
2231:
2227:
2223:
2219:
2216:
2213:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2200:
2199:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2193:
2192:
2191:
2169:
2168:
2167:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2152:
2151:
2150:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2124:
2123:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2119:
2118:
2117:
2116:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2109:
2087:
2086:
2085:
2082:
2080:
2079:A b r v a g l
2073:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2038:
2032:
2031:troymedia.com
2028:
2025:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2006:
2002:
1998:
1996:
1991:
1986:
1985:
1983:
1980:
1976:
1973:
1972:
1970:
1967:
1964:
1960:
1956:
1953:
1950:
1947:
1944:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1936:
1934:
1933:A b r v a g l
1928:
1923:
1920:
1916:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1882:
1878:
1875:
1871:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1854:
1851:
1846:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1831:
1829:
1828:A b r v a g l
1823:
1819:
1816:
1813:
1810:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1786:
1785:
1783:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1774:
1772:
1771:A b r v a g l
1766:
1762:
1759:
1754:
1751:
1747:
1746:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1734:
1729:
1728:
1725:
1721:
1718:
1714:
1709:
1708:
1706:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1690:
1688:
1687:A b r v a g l
1682:
1678:
1674:
1671:
1666:
1661:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1642:
1639:
1634:
1632:
1628:
1620:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1570:
1568:
1567:A b r v a g l
1562:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1530:
1528:
1527:A b r v a g l
1522:
1521:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1501:
1498:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1490:
1488:
1487:A b r v a g l
1482:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1456:WP:AGEMATTERS
1453:
1449:
1445:
1444:WP:AGEMATTERS
1441:
1438:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1428:
1426:
1425:A b r v a g l
1419:
1415:
1410:
1407:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1388:
1385:
1382:
1378:
1376:
1371:
1366:
1365:
1363:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1354:
1352:
1351:A b r v a g l
1346:
1343:
1340:
1339:"Fatherland":
1336:
1335:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1319:
1315:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1263:
1260:
1258:
1257:A b r v a g l
1252:
1249:
1246:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1221:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1198:
1194:
1192:
1188:
1187:
1185:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1176:
1174:
1173:A b r v a g l
1169:
1164:
1160:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1125:
1123:
1122:A b r v a g l
1115:
1111:
1110:
1106:
1098:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1051:
1047:
1041:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1031:
1029:
1028:A b r v a g l
1022:
1019:
1014:
1010:
1009:Pharaphrasing
1007:
1006:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
988:
987:
984:
982:
981:A b r v a g l
976:
971:
970:
969:
965:
961:
957:
951:
947:
946:
944:
941:
938:According to
937:
936:
935:
932:
930:
929:A b r v a g l
924:
920:
916:
912:
908:
904:
902:
899:
896:
894:
891:
888:
885:
882:
877:
872:
871:
870:
866:
862:
858:
856:
852:
848:
843:
840:
839:
838:
835:
833:
832:A b r v a g l
826:
825:
824:
820:
816:
812:
811:
810:
807:
805:
804:A b r v a g l
799:
798:
797:
793:
789:
785:
782:
778:
775:
774:
773:
770:
768:
767:A b r v a g l
762:
758:
754:
753:
752:
749:
747:
746:A b r v a g l
741:
737:
733:
732:
731:
727:
723:
719:
718:
717:
714:
712:
711:A b r v a g l
706:
702:
701:
700:
699:
696:
694:
693:A b r v a g l
687:
683:
681:
677:
675:
666:
662:
659:
657:
656:A b r v a g l
650:
646:
645:
644:
643:
640:
638:
637:A b r v a g l
631:
624:
620:
617:As noted by @
615:
613:
609:
604:
603:
596:
594:
586:
581:
576:
575:
561:
560:
553:
550:
548:
545:
544:
541:
540:
536:
531:
526:
525:
518:
516:
512:
508:
504:
499:
497:
493:
489:
485:
480:
477:
473:
472:
456:
452:
446:
443:
442:
439:
422:
418:
414:
410:
409:
404:
401:
398:
394:
393:
389:
383:
380:
377:
373:
360:
356:
350:
347:
346:
343:
326:
322:
318:
317:
312:
309:
305:
304:
300:
294:
291:
288:
284:
271:
267:
261:
258:
257:
253:
249:
232:
228:
224:
223:
215:
204:
202:
199:
195:
194:
190:
184:
181:
178:
174:
161:
157:
151:
148:
147:
144:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
109:
106:
103:
99:
98:
94:
88:
85:
82:
78:
73:
69:
63:
55:
51:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
2380:
2337:ZaniGiovanni
2332:
2321:
2298:ZaniGiovanni
2283:
2247:unacceptable
2230:ZaniGiovanni
2078:
2036:
2034:
2009:ZaniGiovanni
2004:
1994:
1989:
1987:
1981:And another
1974:
1932:
1925:
1914:
1880:
1873:
1857:ZaniGiovanni
1827:
1796:ZaniGiovanni
1787:
1770:
1756:
1736:ZaniGiovanni
1710:
1686:
1670:“eradicating
1668:
1664:
1645:ZaniGiovanni
1635:
1624:
1579:ZaniGiovanni
1566:
1546:ZaniGiovanni
1541:
1526:
1511:ZaniGiovanni
1486:
1468:ZaniGiovanni
1447:
1424:
1392:ZaniGiovanni
1367:
1350:
1325:ZaniGiovanni
1313:
1287:
1256:
1231:ZaniGiovanni
1226:
1210:ZaniGiovanni
1201:
1195:
1189:
1183:
1172:
1121:
1116:
1112:
1105:full version
1102:
1057:ZaniGiovanni
1049:
1027:
1017:
996:ZaniGiovanni
980:
974:
960:ZaniGiovanni
928:
918:
914:
910:
906:
897:
889:
861:ZaniGiovanni
847:ZaniGiovanni
831:
815:ZaniGiovanni
803:
788:ZaniGiovanni
766:
757:ZaniGiovanni
745:
710:
692:
684:
678:
670:
655:
636:
632:
619:ZaniGiovanni
616:
605:
600:
593:
579:
534:
500:
481:
450:
421:project page
406:
402:
354:
314:
265:
220:
155:
126:project page
111:
107:
68:WikiProjects
35:
2049:discussion.
1959:WP:PLAGFORM
1711:During the
1702:WP:PLAGFORM
1631:WP:PLAGFORM
1406:age matters
1321:Prove what?
1163:curent list
649:Tigratakert
417:Artsakhians
2408:Categories
2265:sealioning
2226:WP:SEALION
1696:1) Again,
1538:WP:SEALION
1370:Arif Yunus
1155:textbooks.
496:designated
492:Azerbaijan
236:Azerbaijan
227:Azerbaijan
183:Azerbaijan
2312:explained
2257:explained
2243:because??
2069:sponsored
2058:candidate
2046:editorial
1822:Azermarka
1362:textbook.
1245:question.
1191:conflict”
1168:platform.
1043:injuries.
923:synthesis
886:Moreover,
552:Archive 2
547:Archive 1
509:, or any
122:Armenians
2042:about us
2040:". From
1418:reliable
1414:PDF file
1135:Dallavid
761:WP:SYNTH
722:Dallavid
580:365 days
535:Archives
28:deletion
2005:obvious
1416:is not
1375:Armenia
942:(ECRI)
878:states
842:Abrvagl
488:Armenia
453:on the
426:Artsakh
413:Artsakh
382:Artsakh
357:on the
268:on the
158:on the
131:Armenia
118:Armenia
87:Armenia
58:C-class
1843:facts.
1782:source
1659:topic.
1561:burden
1437:WP:RSN
881:States
781:Day.az
736:source
612:source
64:scale.
1621:Edits
1464:WP:RS
1460:WP:RS
1452:WP:RS
2396:talk
2341:talk
2316:onus
2302:talk
2234:talk
2013:talk
1861:talk
1800:talk
1740:talk
1724:POWs
1717:POWs
1698:this
1681:POWs
1649:talk
1638:This
1627:This
1583:talk
1550:talk
1515:talk
1472:talk
1396:talk
1329:talk
1284:This
1235:talk
1214:talk
1152:work
1139:talk
1061:talk
1011:and
1000:talk
964:talk
917:and
905:The
865:talk
851:talk
819:talk
792:talk
777:This
726:talk
482:The
415:and
349:High
150:High
120:and
36:keep
34:was
2333:you
2063:4.
2052:3.
2029:2.
1848:by
1763:2.
1748:1)
1636:2)
1625:1)
1542:you
1282:2)
1227:you
445:Top
260:Mid
2410::
2398:)
2390:.
2343:)
2304:)
2236:)
2228:.
2015:)
1997:."
1984:;
1971:;
1863:)
1802:)
1742:)
1651:)
1633:.
1585:)
1552:)
1517:)
1474:)
1398:)
1331:)
1237:)
1216:)
1141:)
1133:--
1063:)
1018:A
1002:)
966:)
949:9)
945::
890:A.
867:)
853:)
821:)
794:)
763:?
728:)
676:.
490:,
2394:(
2339:(
2300:(
2232:(
2026:.
2011:(
1918:.
1859:(
1798:(
1738:(
1730:.
1719:,
1663:"
1647:(
1581:(
1548:(
1513:(
1470:(
1439:.
1394:(
1377:.
1327:(
1288:s
1233:(
1212:(
1184:s
1137:(
1059:(
998:(
975:A
962:(
919:B
915:A
911:A
907:B
898:B
863:(
849:(
817:(
790:(
755:@
724:(
457:.
361:.
272:.
162:.
70::
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
