Talk:Antisemitism in the British Labour Party/Archive 12

1824:

unchallenged point that non-Zionism, anti-Zionism or even substantive criticism of the Israeli government that is not expressed within a tone of special deference that no other government on the planet is ever given with people express dissent against its "security" policies are anything other than fair-minded, fairly-expressed discussion on a pertinent issue of the day. Criticism of what the Israeli governent does to ordinary Palestinians is simply dissent against the policies of a sitting government. Refusal to support Zionism, a now-permanently right-wing nationalist movement that achieved all of its objectives in 1948 by creating the state it sought, a state whose survival is guaranteed no matter what, should not be treated as any different than refusal to support any OTHER already-concluded nationalist movement.

558: 1572:

an op ed in the JC on the new historians (2023), a review in the Morning Star of a book he edited about Palestine (2022), an article in the Socialist Worker about his appearance at an SWP event (2018), a review of a book about Palestine on the LSE blog (2015). I also disagree that the question of antisemitism in the UK Labour Party is “as much about pro-Israeli activism as anything else”; it’s primarily about antisemitism and about Labour Party politics, and he is an expert on neither. But not pushing this unless other editors feel the same as me.

143:), was released on 19 July 2022, stating that: "ather than confront the paramount need to deal with the profoundly serious issue of anti-Semitism in the party, both factions treated it as a factional weapon." It also described senior Labour staff as having displayed "deplorably factional and insensitive, and at times discriminatory, attitudes" towards Corbyn and his supporters, and detailed concerns by some staff about a "hierarchy of racism" in the party which ignored Black people." 31: 256: 1069:

a whole bunch of places in talkpages where editors did supply their own viewpoints about article topics, though, if you're looking for people to give a ticking off to. Of course, if we hadn't been treating shite from the pro-Israel press as having come from reliable sources, I wouldn't have been here trying to track down the source of an image in the first place.

1608:

therefore adequately covered in the linked main article. (In my view, that entire "criticisms" section should be removed, as it does not belong in this article.) This might be due in an article about the definition (indeed, he features very heavily there) as a legal expert, but this article shouldn't be going in to such detail about the legality of the definition.

923:

Aleister Crowley, Carnegie & Warburg'." The CritiqueArchives articles by Martin Odoni have a particular resonance for me because one of those articles was the first one I supplied a link to when I wrote about David Collier on the talkpage of the UK Israel Lobby article, for which I was issued a warning.

163:

to confirm noteworthiness. I just removed a Canadian psychologist's views and a fringe blog, but we have all sorts of other opinions at length under "Rebuttals", a section which does not, as far as I can see, have any equivalent in any other article, as well as responding to almost every factual development.

1870:

A better title may be "Allegations of Antisemitism in the Labour Party", but generally agree with this change. The article includes a large amount of content that includes both proven, unproven, and disproven allegations, and a title along these lines would be more accurate. The article clearly needs

1847:

coverage, and removing the parts that didn't (along with eg. toning down focus on opinion pieces that lack secondary coverage.) The title also seems off in that it's actually about a very specific and narrow allegation, timewise - the article is about Corbyn, not the Labour party. Some parts are also

985:

you provided a link to is that it provides an explanation for why Mear One painted the mural in the location he did. The pro-Israel Press and critics claimed that he deliberately chose an area with a higher Jewish population in order to paint a provocative mural portraying antisemitic stereotypes. In

1638:

I agree that the 2017 mention is due on the main article but not here, and that the Camden piece is of questionable weight as well. I would retain the joint letter in the Jewish activists section, since this is not solely relying on Sedley at all for weight; the piece is jointly attributed to all 13

1571:

I guess we'll leave Pappe in for now. He did train and teach as a political scientist, although he is known primarily as a historian and activist. I don't agree he is a prominent commentator in the UK or on UK topics. I checked Google News and the only UK coverage of him all the way back to 2015 is:

1527:

Levy perhaps not upon a second look, but Norman Finkelstein is a political scientist, which is exactly the kind of subject matter expert whose opinion is valuable in relation to a political imbroglio. He has also partly focused his studies on the ideological weaponization of identity politics, which

1209:

undid my switch of a link to ] to ] with the summary "Viera is a different, real person; link to Riviera is later in sentence. (The different bracket formats of the two "sic"s need checking too I think))". Vera is indeed a real person, he's an obscure Uruguayan soccer player. It seems clear that the

1068:

The point was to try to track down the source of an image. In doing so, sources which may have been of use in the article may have been uncovered. The essence of WP:FORUM is that editors discuss the topic, exchanging their own views about it. That didn't happen here. I'm sure that I can point you to

796:

The way the article is written will reflect the source which was chosen. Other sources actually listed who each of the figures were supposed to be, though without linking them to a particular figure in the mural. The inclusion of Crowley is a bit anomalous, given that the others are industialists or

741:

Its long been known who Mear One said he'd painted and that was ignored in the insistence that the figures represented antisemitic Jewish stereotypes, which assertion is the basis for the claim that the mural was antisemitic.. What's new is that somebody has gone to the trouble of digging out photos

1802:

its interesting that Naz Shah's remark was aimed at Israel. I don't agree with it but it seems similiar to Ben Carson's remark (Carson said he is not opposed to a Palestinian state, but he questioned why it needs "to be within the confines of Israeli territory ... Is that necessary, or can you sort

1685:

it was decided that it was a reliable source to be used on a BLP, pretty much the gold standard in wiki terms. The rfc finished with the conclusion "What this means for us Knowledge editors is that the Morning Star can be used as a source but we should strive for context and, if we can help it, try

922:

linked to which quotes Mear One explaining who, in order, the people featured in the mural are (beforehand, I'd seen the names given, but not the order): "The US artist who painted the mural, Kalen Ockerman, has identified the men it depicts as, from left to right, 'Rothschild, Rockefeller, Morgan,

162:

I've removed the MEMO opinion piece. Current first para is accurately sourced to RSs. I think the proposed version here is far more encyclopaedic though and would support it. No opinion on second para, but to note this article includes a huge amount of attributed opinion without secondary coverage

1302:

Starting with a 2018 RfC now in the talk archives, there is long-term consensus that the extremely long "Rebuttals" section needs to be trimmed, but no consensus on what should go. I think we should revisit this. I've removed a couple of obviously non-noteworthy items, and I propose the following:

1233:

Rockefeller doesn't have a link because there's nobody of that name and we name and link him later in the sentence. Without the Vera link, we don't know there's somebody of that name, but I don't feel strongly about this. Definitely better to link Rivera from his own name in the second half of the

1083:

In order to include this information in the article, we would need discussion in reliable secondary sources. Note too that what is at issue is not whom the artist portrayed, but how they would be seen by an informed observer. They look like stereotypical Jewish banksters (even more than the people

1607:

Sedley: We currently cite the primary source (Sedley 2017 here), the LRB (a reputable outlet for opinion, although not consistently reliable) as the first in a long list of opinions in the IHRA WD section, even though his comment is not about the Labour Party but rather about the definition, and

1786:

As a minor point, the article also seems to conflate anti-Israel politics with antisemitism, a conflation which can (ironically enough) also be considered antisemitic - in that Israel and its politics doesn't equate to all of Jewish folk, nor is Israel only made up of Jewish people. The article

986:

fact, the wall at 45 Hanbury Street was an organised mural venue. Mear One's mural replaced another one and was itself due for replacement, though a large part of it was painted out after it was vandalised with "vicious Zionist graffiti, which was clearly inciting racial hatred and terrorism."

1763:. (A book from OR Books, a print-on-demand publisher, is in no way automatically excluded if the author is well known and satisfy RS independently. Asa Winstanley does not. And quite frankly, whenever an IP only edits to push for the inclusion of an obscure book, it look a lot like promotion). 1495:

I would caution against being too enthusiastic to remove the likes of Gideon Levy/Norman Finkelstein/Noam Chomsky/Ilan Pappé - these are all prominent voices whose views can reasonably stand even when sourced to opinion pieces, provided they are attributed as such. Such perspectives provide an

1611:

Then, in the "Jewish activists" sub-section of the rebuttals section, the letter to the Guardian editor he co-wrote with 13 other British Jews is listed among Jewish responses. Here we cite the primary source (Sedley et al 2018). I really don't think that's due as it has no secondary sources

1512:

Apart from Chomsky, I don't think they are prominent voices in the UK (Levy definitely isn't), and none of them seem to have relevant expertise to comment on UK politics, antisemitism or British socialism. Their opinion is nothing other than opinion, and lots of other equally prominent people

1823:

It is not an unchallenged or unchallengable point that there actually ever was a massive or even significant increse in antisemitism within Labour under Jeremy Corbyn, OR that any such antisemitism was ever primarily extant among left-wing Labour people. It is also not an unchallengable or

1556:

Pappé, like Finkelstein, is a political studies expert, and this article is as much about politics as it is stigmatization. He is also a generally prominent academic and social commentator on Israeli politics, and the censuring of Corbyn/Labour on the premise of antisemitism is as much about

2116:

Re Iskandar suggestion of integrating rebuttals alongside claims: I might support that to some extent if it was possible, but the problem here would be making sure we were only including rebuttals with due weight and not filling the main part of the body with opinion pieces, especially from

139: 742:

of the people Mear One said he painted and superimposing them over each of the figures in the mural, making a strong case that the figures do represent who they're claimed to be. I'm trying to trace the image back to the person who created it or the place where it first appeared.

2117:

non-noteworthy commentators. At the moment, we have a vast amount of opinion (and it is very unrepresentative of the opinion published in the period in reliable sources, as almost all of the opinion pieces are the rebuttals, which were probably a minority of what was published).

913:

Thanks, that's the clearest version of the image I've seen, though it doesn't appear to have come from the Martin Odoni article from which an extract has been printed in conjuction. The link for Odoni's article on the Guerilla Wire site no longer works, but a copy can be found

2274:

I've added a more historical opening sentence and deleted a paragraph of unnecessary recent detail. Not opposed to a split, but prefer the trimming of yesterday's news (as Iskandar323 put it above), as the post-2015 is unnecessarily detailed and choked with undue opinions.

1964:. Partly for that reason strongly oppose a name change to focus on Corbyn (which would delete the pre-Corbyn history and create a recentist article, and strongly oppose a rename with "allegations". I've edited the lead and short description so they reflect the body. 125:

The first paragraph on the Forde report contains a factual error that should be corrected urgently; it says the Forde report concluded that there had been a hierachy of racism established within Labour, when it said no such thing (the report is freely available here

206:

I've restored the MEMO source as (a) I'm not sure if it is opinion or not, and (b) I thought there is consensus that Middle East Monitor is ] but it seems there isn't. I do feel there must be stronger sources though and still support the version proposed above by

2254:

The lead section as-written is not an accurate summary of the contents of this article. The article covers allegations of antisemitism since the 20th Century and yet the introduction describes allegations since 2015 only. It would be advisable to rewrite or

177:

Not all opinion is undue, it depends, not least on whose opinion it is. Not sure what "huge amount" means but I agree that "Rebuttals" seems odd in isolation, perhaps there should be a section called "Criticism" or "Controversy" or something of that sort.

2051:

Actually, I've slightly lost track of what's going on on this page, but I know there's still more opinion to expunge - there's just a complex web of sfns linking back to many of the opinion pieces - it's a bugger hunting down many of the loose ends.

2295:

There is currently a long third paragraph of this section which seems to me undue past the first two sentences, as it isn't actually about the subject of this article. Removing it would be one step towards word length reduction. Any objections?

1615:

Then he appears again in the "Academics and researchers" sub-section (is he an academic or a researcher?), citing a secondary source published a year later, the local paper for the Kentish Town area where he had apparently recently lived,

2133:

Maybe we can fork it between Corbyn and everyone else then, reorg the page to go by different types of accusations and controversy instead of the timeline and then just have a short "Jeremy Corbyn" section with a {main} link to

1260:. But just because there happens to be someone on Knowledge with the name Diego Vera, who is extremely unlikely to have been the source of confusion, it just seems wrong to link to him. (And actually you were right, it was 592:

which juxtaposes those shown sitting round the table in the mural with photographs of the people Mear One stated that he had painted. As can be seen, the image was posted in a reply to an article in Simon Maginn's

1592:

I would add that the material that I believe you are referring involving Stephen Sedley appear to be twice published by reliable, secondary sources, first in the London Review of Books and then quoted from there.

1177:

is a healthcare ethicist with no previous publications or teaching record on antisemitism. The second author does not appear to have an academic affiliation, but is presumably the Liberal Democrat activist

704: 2152:

I would be more in favour of starting by trimming the opinion heavily (there seems to b e consensus on doing that, but perhaps not on which part of the opinion to expunge) and then seeing where we are.

146:

Finally, the second paragraph in that section appears to have purely primary citations and I'm not sure it really merits inclusion? Aren't secondary sources generally required to demonstrate relevance?

1852:, especially the background and polling parts - we should focus on removing any source that doesn't specifically talk about antisemitism in Labour. But to get back to your main point, based on the 1114:"depicted capitalists playing games on a board..the capitalists have been interpreted as Jewish caricatures. Supporters (including the artist) maintain that it is anti-capitalist not anti-Semitic" 1449:

There is no consensus on whether the Morning Star engages in factual reporting, and broad consensus that it is a biased and partisan source. All uses of the Morning Star should be attributed.

2174:

While providing some useful counters to many of the evidence-free claims of anti-semitism within the Labour Party, this section might be improved (style-wise) with a little slimming down.

1358:: he might be noteworthy in relation to legal issues to do with institutional antisemitism, but his views of "pro-Israel groups" aren't noteworthy, as he has no relevant expertise in that 1960:

I just made some edits without reading this section first; not sure why I missed it in August. I support the trimming (thanks Iskandar for your trims) and agree that it should match the

72: 67: 624:

I didn't claim it was, but thanks for the reminder. What I've asked editors to do is help track down the origin of the image, which may, or may not, be Twitter, but I'd guess isn't.

1108:

book shows another New World Order graffiti mural by the same artist so I think those words are little to do with anything specific to this mural, just a recurring theme of the artist

59: 1700:

OK, but what about the specific suggestions I made which relate to the Morning Star: specifically, what is the case for the noteworthiness of the paragraph about Andrew Feinstein?

1102:

is a POV though I think the picture only contains that if the viewer is actually looking for it, eye of the beholder and all, when I saw it, I only saw greedy bankers. The book

1048: 1030: 604: 1733:

Might not this article include information from books such as this one, along with the 'Leaked' Labour Report, the Forde Report and the Labour Files, to form a new section?

1528:

is directly pertinent here. Ilan Pappé is meanwhile a UK-based academic and co-director of the Exeter Centre for Ethno-Political Studies and also a relevant specialist.

588:

of the article on Mear One's "Freedom for Humanity" mural, which is mentioned several times in the current article, I've asked editors to help track down the origin of

2100:

It is/would be better to integrate any rebuttals alongside the claims that are being rebutted. Splitting off all counterclaims would just create two unbalanced pages.

1183: 47: 17: 1667:

I am now going to start removing the above which weren’t defended, while leaving those on which there was any disagreement. Good to have more views on those.

130:). The citation provided for this is an opinion piece, which Knowledge does not approve of to be used as an RS for precisely the reason they're not reliable! 1179: 2023:

I think you accidentally reverted some of my trimming and tagging when you rightly did your trim just now. I've restored - hope I've not made a mistake.

754:

I see. I just saw that the list of names is not actually mentioned in the article unless I missed that, just says " Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Morgans"

1620:, at great length, talking about a topic on which he has no particular expertise or authority: Labour politics. This quoted an LRB article, I think a " 1961: 1938: 2259:

the article into one on the broader history of antisemitism in the Labour Party and one on antisemitism since Jeremy Corbyn's election as leader.

1132:

Source: 2022 journal article discussing the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism, with references to the Labour Party antisemitism controversy.

444: 93: 1542:

Why do you think Pappé is a relevant specialist? He’s a historian of Israel/Palestine, not a scholar of antisemitism or the U.K. Labour Party.

564:

Could you provide a secondary source for this? Seems fine, but since the BBC isn't talking about them, it might not be notable to be included.

418: 361: 2305: 1825: 1788: 1740: 1612:

indicating it is noteworthy and its authors are not that prominent. It's one among many letters to the editor on this topic in this period.

96: 1686:

not to have it as the sole source" So dimissing content based on MS sourcing cannot be justified in my view, especially in this context.

1351:: his views on Israeli history might be noteworthy, but he it not an expert on Labour or antisemitism, so why does he have so much space? 1341:

Remove letter by 14 British Jews - not sufficiently prominent for inclusion given the massive number of letters to editors in this period

1218:

is misleading, it should either be unlinked, similarly to the earlier misspelling of Rockerfeller, or correctly linked to Diego Rivera.

266: 2181: 1804: 1311:, which has already been mentioned twice in the body, either to its chronological place in 2017 if it's really noteworthy or altogther 332:. Don't worry about it if you feel this isn't relevant or violates some rule, I just thought it might be a useful addition. Thanks, 1331:

Remove the 2015 letter from "dozens of activists", which cites a Jewish Chronicle dead link, as these activists are not noteworthy

915: 809:

That link I gave, it just says "who was a kind of philosophical guru to the ruling elite of that time and a well-known Satanist."

2232:

I will soon start to trim the material in the responses that is tagged with undue weight. Please speak out here if you disagree.

472: 192:

Anyway, this is not "Forde Report", this section being started back in July last year. Maybe make a new talk at bottom of page?

2203:

I'd also suggest that the subsection on the IHRA has too much opinion content and should be trimmed back to the facts. Agreed?

1469:

G-13114, any specific objection to removing the two MS-cited pieces I've listed (I'm not arguing for removal of the other 14)?

919: 510: 1682: 1430: 532: 325: 137:

to the below: "The Forde Report, written by lawyer Martin Forde in response to the dossier that was leaked in April 2020 (

823:

The link to David Icke's website? That being the case, I'm wondering whether the "ruling elite" were lizards in disguise.

2320: 2284: 2268: 2241: 2227: 2212: 2189: 2162: 2147: 2126: 2109: 2095: 2075: 2061: 2046: 2032: 2015: 2000: 1973: 1950: 1932: 1916: 1898: 1880: 1865: 1833: 1812: 1796: 1772: 1748: 1709: 1695: 1676: 1648: 1633: 1602: 1581: 1566: 1551: 1537: 1522: 1505: 1478: 1464: 1442: 1421: 1308: 1287: 1273: 1243: 1227: 1195: 1167: 1123: 1093: 1076: 1063: 1021:

I'm a bit confused. Do we want citations to Twitter, blogs, and David Icke in this article? If not, what is this about?

993: 930: 864: 846: 818: 804: 763: 749: 716: 698: 652: 631: 619: 597:

whose subject matter is of relevance here and whose contents editors may also like to track down reliable sources for.

573: 341: 234: 220: 201: 187: 172: 156: 119: 104: 2086:

Can we content-fork "Rebuttals"? It's the only section not placed on the strict timeline of the rest of the article.

1783:

Much of this article seems to be about Anti-Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party - perhaps a name change is in order?

1252:

I think if the mistake related to a similar, equally notable, person then I'd agree to link. Say if someone mixed up

328:) - seems relevant given this article is on Antisemitism and JVL represents the views of a number of Jews within the 2135: 1803:

of slip that area down into Egypt?") - is that quote included in an anti-palestinism in the republican party page ?

1383:- why is his Israeli opinion piece more noteworthy than the acres of Israeli journalists who took the opposite view? 1369:

in the Morning Star, as they are philosophy/literary scholars writing in not particularly authoritative publications

2264: 1894: 1876: 92:

Should we add something about the Forde Report finding that antiSemitism was used as ‘factional weapon’? Link here

38: 2316: 2301: 2280: 2237: 2223: 2208: 2158: 2122: 2071: 2028: 2011: 1969: 1705: 1672: 1629: 1577: 1547: 1518: 1474: 1460: 1417: 1283: 1239: 1191: 1089: 1026: 637: 216: 168: 115: 1792: 100: 1829: 1744: 669:

Thanks for that. Doing Google searches uncovers various possibilities. There's a clearer version of the image

94:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/19/antisemitism-factional-weapon-labour-party-forde-report-finds

2185: 2143: 2091: 321: 313: 305: 291: 262: 1318:'s antisemitic comment, which is not a rebuttal, out of this section to its chronological place in the body 133:

I also think the tone is more journalistic than ideal - I have updated the previously identical section on

1941:, so these two pages should probably really be considered in tandem given that it's all a political game. 1808: 1044: 615: 1054:

I think we are done here tbh, it was worth trying to find the image origin but no real progress on that.

2260: 2105: 2057: 2042: 1996: 1946: 1928: 1912: 1890: 1872: 1644: 1598: 1562: 1533: 1501: 1119: 1059: 860: 814: 759: 712: 648: 230: 197: 183: 127: 1145: 670: 589: 2312: 2297: 2276: 2233: 2219: 2204: 2177: 2154: 2118: 2067: 2024: 2007: 1965: 1736: 1701: 1668: 1625: 1573: 1543: 1514: 1470: 1456: 1413: 1362: 1279: 1269: 1235: 1223: 1206: 1187: 1085: 1022: 212: 208: 164: 152: 148: 111: 1621: 1861: 1844: 1840: 1143:"What Is Wrong with the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s Definition of Antisemitism?" 2200:

As there seems to be consensus for trimming, I am going to boldly trim some opinion content now.

1819:

Entry Title is massively NOT NPOV...please change it to "ALLEGED Antisemitism In The Labour Party"

1373: 1155: 2139: 2087: 1984: 1617: 1387: 1366: 1163: 1072: 989: 926: 842: 800: 745: 694: 627: 600: 1455:. It is used 16 times in the article, including many opinion pieces, and only twice attributed. 1174: 686: 682: 1839:

I dunno about that, but it does seem like this article's massive size was partially glutted by

1513:

expressed opinions on this hot topic in the years it was controversial. Why them specifically?

1142: 827: 640: 140:

The work of the Labour Party's Governance and Legal Unit in relation to antisemitism, 2014–2019

1988: 1691: 1438: 1107: 1040: 611: 594: 329: 1111: 2101: 2053: 2038: 2020: 1992: 1942: 1924: 1908: 1768: 1640: 1594: 1558: 1529: 1497: 1451:

Take care to ensure that content from the Morning Star constitutes due weight in the article

1344:

Trim the long para about 42 senior academics - again, why this letter among all the letters?

1335: 1115: 1055: 856: 810: 755: 708: 707:"specifically Rothschild, Rockefeller, Morgan, Carnegie, Warburg, as well Aleister Crowley" 644: 569: 226: 193: 179: 2256: 1886: 1849: 1406: 1265: 1219: 1036: 337: 309: 295: 225:

I reverted the restoration because it says it is an opinion and we don't need it anyway.

1889:, with an article on the overall history and then one on allegations from 2015 onwards. 1904: 1857: 1759:. Neither the author nor the publisher come anywhere close to satisfying our policy of 1355: 1257: 419:"Anti-Corbyn Labour officials covertly diverted election cash to allies, inquiry finds" 304:

While the Jewish Labour Movement welcomed the announcement, the bans were condemned by

290:

While the Jewish Labour Movement welcomed the announcement, the bans were condemned by

1402: 1315: 1106:(2014) discusses Mear One's work and does not mention anti-Semitism/Jews at all. The 134: 2006:

Agree. See previous talk section for some suggestions to start with. Any thoughts?

1760: 1687: 1434: 1391: 1253: 473:"Black Labour staff suffer under party's 'hierarchy of racism', Forde report finds" 449: 316:

for targeting left-wing elements and worsening internal tensions within the party.

298:

for targeting left-wing elements and worsening internal tensions within the party.

389: 689: 1764: 1380: 565: 500: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1084:

they were supposedly modelled on), and the words "New World Order" don't help.

982: 852: 703:

Is it that you want a ref for who are the persons in the mural supposed to be?

1395: 1348: 1328:, an unreliable source, and the Morning Star, which is not generally reliable. 1215: 834: 333: 1405:- why do we need even one, let along two, sentences about Cook, sourced from 1148: 1624:

from May 2018. I don't think he has the expertise to be worth quoting here.

1325: 1182:. What do you think they add to this particular article, in contrast to the 367: 1429:

The Morning Star being used as a source isn't a valid reason to remove it.

1856:, the article's title should reference Corbyn specifically, not Labour. -- 1923:

The short description ironically clarifies the subject as "allegations".

1338:, not a relevant authority in this context, reported only by Morning Star 1214:

to Diego Rivera, as the later part of the sentence corrects. The link to

1136: 797:

bankers. As far as I know, Mear One didn't ever explain that inclusion.

505: 394: 833:

There may be an explanation for the inclusion of Crowley in Mear One's

445:"Antisemitism issue used as 'factional weapon' in Labour, report finds" 128:

https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/The-Forde-Report.pdf

678: 674: 579: 390:"Anti-Semitism used as factional weapon within Labour, says report" 362:"Antisemitism 'used as weapon' by Jeremy Corbyn's friends and foes" 1885:

Given this and the length it seems likely this article requires a

1681:

I'm still not with dismissing Morning Star as a source. Remember,

1104:

My Los Angeles: From Urban Restructuring to Regional Urbanization

1234:

sentence. Apologies I misspelled both names in my edit summary.

1321:

Remove the very long quote of the N Ireland party, which cites

1843:- it's worth going back over it, figuring out which parts had 250: 25: 320:

Add that the 2021 bans of left-wing groups were condemned by

981:

One of the pieces of information I found interesting in the

851:

Well, the raw material (WP links) as well as the image are

247:

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 August 2022

1496:

important subset of views and are important for balance.

1264:, my previous comment should be littered with as well!) 837:. The title, 'False Profits', is probably also a pointer. 1453:

and conforms to the biographies of living persons policy

1173:

Not familiar with this journalist or these authors. The

1871:

quite a lot of refinement in addition to this however.

585: 2037:

Yeah, very sorry, not sure what happened there at all

2250:

Rewriting Lead Section (Non-Complaint with MOS:INTRO)

1278:

I don't feel strongly - whatever seems best is cool.

580:

Mear One's "Freedom for Humanity" mural, a challenge!

855:, appears to be a "Martin Odoni", maybe twas them? 501:"Left-wing anger over expulsions from Labour Party" 360: 1180:under investigation by his party for antisemitism 1727:HOW THE ISRAEL LOBBY BROUGHT DOWN JEREMY CORBYN 830:containing the image which carries today's date. 1376:- what's his source of authority on this topic? 1433:it was decided that MS was a reliable source. 443:Elgot, Jessica; Walker, Peter (19 July 2022). 2066:The sfns refs do make it harder to untangle. 1683:last time an RFC was held on the Morning Star 1100:They look like stereotypical Jewish banksters 18:Talk:Antisemitism in the British Labour Party 8: 1787:should consider divorcing the two subjects. 1903:Or just some further trimming of the dated 2175: 1734: 1149:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-022-09553-4 1962:Antisemitism in the UK Conservative Party 1939:Antisemitism in the UK Conservative Party 1409:? He has no particular relevant expertise 1557:pro-Israeli activism as anything else. 1394:para sourced from Morning Star and the 1307:Remove the mention of the formation of 1186:on this which we don't currently cite? 495: 493: 351: 2218:As no objections, have done this now. 1448: 1099: 533:"An attack on one is an attack on all" 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1937:But it does parallel the approach in 7: 1639:notable (8 have pages) signatories. 643:, Idk if that gets you any further. 685:points back towards Mear One's own 267:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party 1365:in the London Review of Books and 1141:- Jan Deckers, Jonathan Coulter - 24: 513:from the original on 22 July 2021 2290: 1755:No. Knowledge operates based on 556: 254: 29: 359:Zeffman, Henry (20 July 2022). 2311:As no reply will do this now. 2285:14:51, 25 September 2023 (UTC) 2136:Jeremy Corbyn and antisemitism 1974:14:48, 25 September 2023 (UTC) 1813:15:48, 12 September 2023 (UTC) 1431:the last time it was discussed 1124:10:28, 28 September 2022 (UTC) 1094:05:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC) 1077:14:15, 27 September 2022 (UTC) 1064:11:56, 27 September 2022 (UTC) 1049:10:56, 27 September 2022 (UTC) 1031:10:42, 27 September 2022 (UTC) 994:07:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC) 931:00:40, 27 September 2022 (UTC) 865:21:55, 26 September 2022 (UTC) 847:18:54, 26 September 2022 (UTC) 819:18:35, 26 September 2022 (UTC) 805:18:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC) 764:18:27, 26 September 2022 (UTC) 750:18:22, 26 September 2022 (UTC) 717:17:34, 26 September 2022 (UTC) 699:16:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC) 653:15:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC) 632:15:47, 26 September 2022 (UTC) 620:15:40, 26 September 2022 (UTC) 605:15:27, 26 September 2022 (UTC) 471:White, Nadine (19 July 2022). 1: 673:. Donahue Rogers has his own 235:16:51, 20 February 2023 (UTC) 221:16:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC) 202:12:43, 20 February 2023 (UTC) 188:12:42, 20 February 2023 (UTC) 173:12:22, 20 February 2023 (UTC) 157:21:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC) 2321:14:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 2213:14:41, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 1309:Labour Against the Witchhunt 1196:09:47, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 1168:00:47, 18 October 2022 (UTC) 287:Change in the 2021 section: 2306:08:27, 2 October 2023 (UTC) 2269:00:28, 20 August 2023 (UTC) 2242:17:26, 3 January 2024 (UTC) 2228:16:37, 3 January 2024 (UTC) 2163:08:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC) 2148:19:08, 27 August 2023 (UTC) 2127:08:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC) 2110:16:05, 25 August 2023 (UTC) 2096:15:07, 25 August 2023 (UTC) 1951:07:19, 24 August 2023 (UTC) 1933:07:17, 24 August 2023 (UTC) 1917:07:09, 24 August 2023 (UTC) 1899:22:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC) 1881:00:22, 20 August 2023 (UTC) 1797:09:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 826:There is a Donahue Rogers' 574:05:00, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 417:Stone, Jon (19 July 2022). 342:23:21, 15 August 2022 (UTC) 281:to reactivate your request. 269:has been answered. Set the 2337: 1983:This article has become a 1724:Weaponising Anti-Semitism 1202:Diego Vera vs Diego Rivera 918:. I was interested in the 2291:Corbyn's backbench record 1866:19:33, 17 July 2023 (UTC) 1834:17:27, 17 July 2023 (UTC) 1773:09:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC) 1749:03:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC) 1720:Weaponising Anti-Semitism 1622:Short Cuts" opinion piece 120:22:24, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 105:19:10, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 2190:20:14, 3 June 2023 (UTC) 2076:07:35, 20 May 2023 (UTC) 2062:06:35, 20 May 2023 (UTC) 2047:06:30, 20 May 2023 (UTC) 2033:21:23, 19 May 2023 (UTC) 2016:21:15, 19 May 2023 (UTC) 2001:17:06, 19 May 2023 (UTC) 1991:. Condensing is needed. 1710:11:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC) 1696:20:24, 5 July 2023 (UTC) 1677:06:53, 5 July 2023 (UTC) 1649:08:08, 23 May 2023 (UTC) 1634:07:57, 23 May 2023 (UTC) 1603:15:35, 22 May 2023 (UTC) 1582:14:35, 5 July 2023 (UTC) 1567:11:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC) 1552:07:02, 5 July 2023 (UTC) 1538:15:24, 22 May 2023 (UTC) 1523:13:52, 22 May 2023 (UTC) 1506:09:22, 20 May 2023 (UTC) 1479:07:50, 5 July 2023 (UTC) 1465:07:40, 20 May 2023 (UTC) 1443:22:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC) 1422:16:51, 19 May 2023 (UTC) 1398:blog - these are not RSs 1354:Remove or at least trim 1288:21:16, 19 May 2023 (UTC) 1274:17:08, 19 May 2023 (UTC) 1244:16:54, 19 May 2023 (UTC) 1228:16:19, 19 May 2023 (UTC) 1098:I thought we were done. 983:CriticalThinking article 1323:two unreliable sources: 537:Jewish Voice for Labour 322:Jewish Voice for Labour 314:Jewish Voice for Labour 1184:many academic articles 610:Twitter is not an RS. 1154:(longer comment left 42:of past discussions. 1207:User:Bobfrombrockley 1987:bloat-fest, not a 1779:Anti-Antisemitism? 1618:Camden New Journal 1388:Norman Finkelstein 1367:Rebecca Ruth Gould 705:Mear One says here 636:The Maginn person 2196:Trimming proposed 2192: 2180:comment added by 1751: 1739:comment added by 638:credits on a blog 285: 284: 85: 84: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2328: 2261:EditorOnOccasion 1891:EditorOnOccasion 1873:EditorOnOccasion 1757:reliable sources 1730:ASA WINSTANLEY 1336:Andrew Feinstein 1166: 1147:, 11 May 2022. ( 1075: 992: 929: 920:Sqwakbox article 845: 803: 748: 697: 679:Facebook account 630: 603: 560: 559: 548: 547: 545: 543: 529: 523: 522: 520: 518: 509:. 22 July 2021. 497: 488: 487: 485: 483: 468: 462: 461: 459: 457: 440: 434: 433: 431: 429: 414: 408: 407: 405: 403: 386: 380: 379: 377: 375: 364: 356: 276: 272: 258: 257: 251: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2336: 2335: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2313:BobFromBrockley 2298:BobFromBrockley 2293: 2277:BobFromBrockley 2252: 2234:BobFromBrockley 2220:BobFromBrockley 2205:BobFromBrockley 2198: 2155:BobFromBrockley 2119:BobFromBrockley 2068:BobFromBrockley 2025:BobFromBrockley 2008:BobFromBrockley 1981: 1966:BobFromBrockley 1907:of yesteryear. 1821: 1781: 1722: 1702:BobFromBrockley 1669:BobFromBrockley 1626:BobFromBrockley 1574:BobFromBrockley 1544:BobFromBrockley 1515:BobFromBrockley 1471:BobFromBrockley 1457:BobFromBrockley 1414:BobFromBrockley 1407:Middle East Eye 1363:Lorna Finlayson 1300: 1280:BobFromBrockley 1236:BobFromBrockley 1204: 1188:BobFromBrockley 1161: 1134: 1070: 1035:A violation of 1023:BobFromBrockley 987: 924: 840: 798: 743: 692: 625: 598: 582: 557: 553: 552: 551: 541: 539: 531: 530: 526: 516: 514: 499: 498: 491: 481: 479: 477:The Independent 470: 469: 465: 455: 453: 442: 441: 437: 427: 425: 423:The Independent 416: 415: 411: 401: 399: 388: 387: 383: 373: 371: 358: 357: 353: 310:Unite the Union 296:Unite the Union 274: 270: 255: 249: 213:BobFromBrockley 165:BobFromBrockley 112:BobFromBrockley 90: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2334: 2332: 2324: 2323: 2292: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2251: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2197: 2194: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2018: 1980: 1977: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1868: 1826:71.197.252.146 1820: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1789:124.168.219.70 1780: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1741:95.149.166.241 1721: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1613: 1609: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1411: 1410: 1399: 1384: 1377: 1370: 1359: 1356:Stephen Sedley 1352: 1345: 1342: 1339: 1332: 1329: 1319: 1312: 1299: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1258:Robert Kennedy 1247: 1246: 1203: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1133: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1080: 1079: 1066: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 996: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 945: 944: 943: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 879: 878: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 838: 831: 824: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772: 771: 770: 769: 768: 767: 766: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 581: 578: 577: 576: 550: 549: 524: 489: 463: 435: 409: 398:. 19 July 2022 381: 350: 349: 345: 319: 283: 282: 259: 248: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 240: 239: 238: 237: 204: 123: 122: 97:88.108.117.173 89: 86: 83: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2333: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2286: 2282: 2278: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2249: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2201: 2195: 2193: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2140:Orchastrattor 2137: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2088:Orchastrattor 2085: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2019: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1978: 1976: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1869: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1784: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1731: 1728: 1725: 1719: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1684: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1591: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1452: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1408: 1404: 1403:Jonathan Cook 1400: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1382: 1378: 1375: 1371: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1357: 1353: 1350: 1346: 1343: 1340: 1337: 1333: 1330: 1327: 1324: 1320: 1317: 1316:Pete Willsman 1313: 1310: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1297: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1208: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1176: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1165: 1159: 1157: 1152: 1150: 1146: 1144: 1140: 1139: 1131: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1082: 1081: 1078: 1074: 1067: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1024: 995: 991: 984: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 932: 928: 921: 917: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 866: 862: 858: 854: 850: 849: 848: 844: 839: 836: 832: 829: 825: 822: 821: 820: 816: 812: 808: 807: 806: 802: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 765: 761: 757: 753: 752: 751: 747: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 718: 714: 710: 706: 702: 701: 700: 696: 690: 688: 687:Facebook page 684: 683:Facebook post 680: 676: 672: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 654: 650: 646: 642: 639: 635: 634: 633: 629: 623: 622: 621: 617: 613: 609: 608: 607: 606: 602: 596: 591: 587: 575: 571: 567: 563: 555: 554: 538: 534: 528: 525: 512: 508: 507: 502: 496: 494: 490: 478: 474: 467: 464: 452: 451: 446: 439: 436: 424: 420: 413: 410: 397: 396: 391: 385: 382: 370: 369: 363: 355: 352: 348: 344: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 323: 317: 315: 311: 307: 302: 299: 297: 293: 288: 280: 277:parameter to 268: 264: 260: 253: 252: 246: 236: 232: 228: 224: 223: 222: 218: 214: 210: 205: 203: 199: 195: 191: 190: 189: 185: 181: 176: 175: 174: 170: 166: 161: 160: 159: 158: 154: 150: 144: 142: 141: 136: 135:Jeremy Corbyn 131: 129: 121: 117: 113: 109: 108: 107: 106: 102: 98: 95: 87: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2294: 2253: 2202: 2199: 2182:46.69.169.26 2176:— Preceding 2173: 1982: 1959: 1853: 1845:WP:SUSTAINED 1841:WP:RECENTISM 1822: 1805:82.11.163.59 1785: 1782: 1756: 1735:— Preceding 1732: 1729: 1726: 1723: 1450: 1412: 1392:Noam Chomsky 1374:Rob Ferguson 1322: 1301: 1261: 1254:John Kennedy 1211: 1205: 1175:first author 1160: 1153: 1137: 1135: 1103: 1041:Slatersteven 1034: 1020: 675:Twitter feed 612:Slatersteven 595:Twitter feed 583: 561: 540:. Retrieved 536: 527: 515:. Retrieved 504: 480:. Retrieved 476: 466: 454:. Retrieved 450:The Guardian 448: 438: 426:. Retrieved 422: 412: 400:. Retrieved 393: 384: 372:. Retrieved 366: 354: 346: 330:Labour Party 318: 303: 300: 289: 286: 278: 263:edit request 145: 138: 132: 124: 91: 88:Forde Report 78: 43: 37: 2102:Iskandar323 2054:Iskandar323 2039:Iskandar323 2021:Iskandar323 1993:Iskandar323 1985:WP:COATRACK 1943:Iskandar323 1925:Iskandar323 1909:Iskandar323 1641:Iskandar323 1595:Iskandar323 1559:Iskandar323 1530:Iskandar323 1498:Iskandar323 1386:Remove the 1381:Gideon Levy 1138:Res Publica 1116:Selfstudier 1056:Selfstudier 857:Selfstudier 811:Selfstudier 756:Selfstudier 709:Selfstudier 645:Selfstudier 641:this person 227:Selfstudier 194:Selfstudier 180:Selfstudier 36:This is an 1989:WP:SUMMARY 1396:Mondoweiss 1349:Ilan Pappe 1266:Tassedethe 1220:Tassedethe 1216:Diego Vera 1210:reference 347:References 271:|answered= 209:WelshDude2 149:WelshDude2 79:Archive 12 73:Archive 11 68:Archive 10 1858:Aquillion 1850:WP:SYNTHy 1447:RSP says 1326:Skwawkbox 1298:Rebuttals 1112:this book 562:Not done: 542:15 August 368:The Times 60:Archive 5 2257:WP:SPLIT 2178:unsigned 1979:Too long 1887:WP:SPLIT 1737:unsigned 1164:ZScarpia 1073:ZScarpia 1037:wp:forum 990:ZScarpia 927:ZScarpia 843:ZScarpia 801:ZScarpia 746:ZScarpia 695:ZScarpia 628:ZScarpia 601:ZScarpia 590:an image 586:talkpage 511:Archived 506:BBC News 395:BBC News 324:(source 306:Momentum 292:Momentum 1905:WP:NEWS 1854:content 1688:G-13114 1435:G-13114 1401:Remove 1379:Remove 1372:Remove 1361:Remove 1347:Remove 1334:Remove 584:On the 517:23 July 482:20 July 456:19 July 428:19 July 402:20 July 374:20 July 39:archive 1848:a bit 1765:Jeppiz 681:. One 566:SWinxy 312:, and 1761:WP:RS 1314:Move 1262:Viera 1256:with 1110:. Or 835:video 828:tweet 334:Mjocc 275:|ans= 261:This 110:Yes. 16:< 2317:talk 2302:talk 2281:talk 2265:talk 2238:talk 2224:talk 2209:talk 2186:talk 2159:talk 2144:talk 2123:talk 2106:talk 2092:talk 2072:talk 2058:talk 2043:talk 2029:talk 2012:talk 1997:talk 1970:talk 1947:talk 1929:talk 1913:talk 1895:talk 1877:talk 1862:talk 1830:talk 1809:talk 1793:talk 1769:talk 1745:talk 1706:talk 1692:talk 1673:talk 1645:talk 1630:talk 1599:talk 1578:talk 1563:talk 1548:talk 1534:talk 1519:talk 1502:talk 1475:talk 1461:talk 1439:talk 1418:talk 1284:talk 1270:talk 1240:talk 1224:talk 1192:talk 1156:here 1120:talk 1090:talk 1060:talk 1045:talk 1027:talk 916:here 861:talk 853:here 815:talk 760:talk 713:talk 691:. 677:and 671:here 649:talk 616:talk 570:talk 544:2022 519:2021 484:2022 458:2022 430:2022 404:2022 376:2022 338:talk 326:here 301:to: 294:and 231:talk 217:talk 198:talk 184:talk 169:talk 153:talk 116:talk 101:talk 1212:was 1162:← 1086:TFD 1071:← 988:← 925:← 841:← 799:← 744:← 693:← 626:← 599:← 273:or 265:to 2319:) 2304:) 2283:) 2267:) 2240:) 2226:) 2211:) 2188:) 2161:) 2146:) 2138:. 2125:) 2108:) 2094:) 2074:) 2060:) 2045:) 2031:) 2014:) 1999:) 1972:) 1949:) 1931:) 1915:) 1897:) 1879:) 1864:) 1832:) 1811:) 1795:) 1771:) 1747:) 1708:) 1694:) 1675:) 1647:) 1632:) 1601:) 1580:) 1565:) 1550:) 1536:) 1521:) 1504:) 1477:) 1463:) 1441:) 1420:) 1286:) 1272:) 1242:) 1226:) 1194:) 1158:) 1151:) 1122:) 1092:) 1062:) 1047:) 1039:? 1029:) 863:) 817:) 762:) 715:) 651:) 618:) 572:) 535:. 503:. 492:^ 475:. 447:. 421:. 392:. 365:. 340:) 308:, 279:no 233:) 219:) 211:. 200:) 186:) 171:) 155:) 118:) 103:) 64:← 2315:( 2300:( 2279:( 2263:( 2236:( 2222:( 2207:( 2184:( 2157:( 2142:( 2121:( 2104:( 2090:( 2070:( 2056:( 2041:( 2027:( 2010:( 1995:( 1968:( 1945:( 1927:( 1911:( 1893:( 1875:( 1860:( 1828:( 1807:( 1791:( 1767:( 1743:( 1704:( 1690:( 1671:( 1643:( 1628:( 1597:( 1576:( 1561:( 1546:( 1532:( 1517:( 1500:( 1473:( 1459:( 1437:( 1416:( 1390:/ 1282:( 1268:( 1238:( 1222:( 1190:( 1118:( 1088:( 1058:( 1043:( 1025:( 859:( 813:( 758:( 711:( 647:( 614:( 568:( 546:. 521:. 486:. 460:. 432:. 406:. 378:. 336:( 229:( 215:( 196:( 182:( 167:( 151:( 114:( 99:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index