Knowledge

Talk:An Essay Concerning Human Understanding

Source 📝

858:"The Ciceronian epigraph chosen for the Essay makes this point eloquently: ‘Quam bellum est velle confiteri potius nescire quod nescias, quam ista effutientem nauseare, atque ipsum sibi displicere!’ Locke offered a perfectly serviceable translation of this passage—although not intended as such, and rendered consistent with his theory of ideas—when describing his own aims in his opening chapter: ‘We should not then perhaps be so forward, out of an affectation of an universal knowledge, to raise questions and perplex ourselves and others with disputes about things to which our understandings are not suited, and of which we cannot frame in our minds any clear and distinct perceptions’ (EHU 1.1.4). A slightly amended version of De Natura Deorum, 1. 84. The rather florid Loeb translation runs as follows: ‘How delightful it would be, Velleius, if when you did not know a thing you would admit your ignorance, instead of uttering this drivel, which must make even your own gorge rise with disgust!’. From an early stage, Locke conceived of his work as intended ‘to give some account of the weaknesse and shortnesse of humane understanding’, the better to expose the absurdity of men wasting ink—and spilling blood—in defence of opinions and doctrines which were entirely incomprehensible. (source: From Moral Theology to Moral Philosophy Cicero and Visions of Humanity from Locke to Hume by Tim Stuart-Buttle, p22) 670:
quotation to be put on the cover. Locke was usually meticulous about his editions, but I don't know about this title page. I will have do research at some point on that issue. It could, of course, be that the publisher liked this quote, thought it applied, misremembered it, and put it on the title page. (I know nothing about seventeenth- and eighteenth-century editions of Cicero and Horace which adds an additional layer of complexity to the issue - are these standard 17c and 18c translations? That is another question to ask.) For me, this is not a pressing issue for the page and one that will take quite a bit of time to unravel. I'm sure someone somewhere has done it (there is a lot of scholarship on the
298: 282: 266: 250: 234: 218: 202: 485: 363: 475: 457: 353: 326: 22: 104: 53: 429: 114: 1311:
The quote in Book II's section is actually in Book IV (section 6). Please either move this into book IV or clarify that Book II is simply laying the foundation for this conclusion later. "Thus, from the consideration of ourselves, and what we infallibly find in our own constitutions, our reason leads
579:
Please do not accuse someone of plagiarism until you have the source(s) from which they copied. I found this page remarkably informative and well-written. Moreover, the first-person examples are explanatory material that would greatly assist the general reader in understanding Locke--they are not the
669:
First of all, in the eighteenth century authors and publishers most often quoted from memory. Very few people owned a lot of books, so they had to remember a lot of stuff. They usually get it slightly wrong and they are limited by what they remember. Second, I am not sure Locke asked for this
555:
This article is in need of editing. There are several grammatical errors but, worse, some sections read as if they were copied verbatim from another source but not cited. The section on knowledge reads in the first person and seems to make specific claims instead of presenting unbiased
802:. It goes from "How much better it would have been, Velleius, to admit you didn't know that which you didn't know" to "How much better it is to prefer to admit that you don't know, what you don't know." This makes more sense for the book, but that's not what Cicero wrote...-- 824:. ;) I still suspect that Locke deliberately changed the quote, to change it into an aphorism for living and to lend an august aura of antique authority to his work. If he remembered the quote at all, it seems plausible to assume that he remembered it 845:
Don't worry about the Wikisource stuff; I just thought that the Leibniz and the physics-y stuff might be fun for you and helpful for your students. I'll get back to it one of these days myself... So nice to see you again,
766:
is full of misremembered quotes. Like I said, it was fairly common because writers just didn't have access to a lot of books. Also, again, I am not sure that Locke asked for this quotation to be placed on the front of the
1010:
partly because picking out just this one influence is very odd, partly because it belongs in the Locke article, not here, and partly because the Locke article has a whole long list of "influenced by" starting with Plato
674:). I have the page on my list of pages to improve. It needs to be sourced and major sections such as "Reception" and "Historical context" need to be added. Right now, it is pretty much a straight-up explanation of the 771:. His publisher might have done that. But, now we have a third option - someone intentionally altered the quotation. You can see how this all spirals out of control. Anyway, this whole discussion should be moved the 792:
Hi Willow, good to see you again. Now I realize I abandoned your wikisource project after two chapters, you should have reminded me!!! As for your comment that the meaning isn't changed...well Vellei=:
1352: 209: 63: 1427: 1412: 1312:
us to the knowledge of this certain and evident truth, that there is an eternal, most powerful, and most knowing being; which whether any one will please to call God, it matters not!"
1397: 1357: 653:
How much more befitting it would have been, Velleius, rather to admit that you didn't know what you didn't know, than to spit forth that nonsense, and arouse your own disgust.
1442: 1432: 1417: 1402: 1347: 1422: 1407: 135:
on Knowledge. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
1392: 658:
Why does he adapt these parts? The Horace one was a slight deviation, but the way it's quoted on the 4th book, it's completely different than what Cicero wrote...--
1447: 1367: 1253: 1249: 1235: 1137: 1133: 1119: 225: 67: 1457: 1342: 419: 409: 162: 713:. It's just updated from the past tense into the present tense, no? Do you think perhaps Locke wanted to give the quote the force of an ever-valid aphorism 1437: 172: 1215: 1462: 1372: 438: 336: 289: 273: 83: 79: 1382: 257: 75: 1199: 1085: 1069: 600: 592: 305: 241: 87: 71: 1362: 385: 1452: 137: 1337: 873: 1472: 1387: 571: 505: 733:
It is a more beautiful thing to wish to acknowledge that which you do not know, than to spout nonsense and disappoint even yourself.
1315: 1231:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1049: 376: 331: 745:
rather than some episode from the past? It's possible that Locke mis-remembered the quote, but that seems unlikely in this case.
1377: 509: 127: 58: 645:
Quam bellum erat, Vellei, confiteri potius nescire, quod nescires, quam ista effutientem nauseare atque ipsum sibi displicere.
1467: 1016: 735: 729: 637:
Quam bellum est velle confiteri potius nescire quod nescias, quam ista effutientem nauseare, atque ipsum sibi displicere.
1296: 1180: 33: 1216:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100630032001/http://mind.ucsd.edu/syllabi/99_00/Empiricism/Readings/Encyc_Phil/Locke.html
499: 462: 832:; it's possible that he had learned the quotes from a poorly edited version of Cicero or a bad Latinate precursor of 1012: 1252:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1136:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1219: 1086:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070407170028/http://www.epistemelinks.com:80/Main/Philosophers.aspx?PhilCode=Lock
877: 567: 1287: 1207: 1171: 1077: 1319: 1323: 1301: 1271:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1259: 1185: 1155:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1143: 1020: 923: 904: 881: 850: 808: 779: 749: 682: 664: 621: 612: 584: 563: 39: 1206:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1076:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 803: 659: 607: 1110: 869: 559: 513: 1225: 1089: 21: 384:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
984: 964: 368: 1256:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1140:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1272: 1156: 1046: 951: 119: 1042: 919: 900: 828:, or? On the other hand, though, it's funny that Locke misremembered quotes throughout his 1279: 1163: 989: 955: 517: 1238:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1122:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 947: 1278:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1162:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
297: 281: 265: 249: 233: 217: 201: 1331: 998: 776: 679: 618: 581: 484: 847: 746: 580:
author's POV on Locke. I felt that the previous comment was harsh and unnecessary.
490: 997:"from a tabula rasa to that of an adult, in complete isolation from society" on a 1039:
The 'Arabick' Interest of the Natural Philosophers in Seventeenth-Century England
892:
I've started filling in these sections. Any comments/help would be appreciated.
606:
Well, there's still the Cicero in the cover of "Essay on Humane Understanding".--
1245: 1129: 994: 915: 896: 381: 362: 1244:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1128:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1002: 980: 972: 968: 960: 480: 358: 132: 109: 914:
There are very few citations in this article - or even quotes from the work.
895:
I'm using Locke's Works, Vol 1, 2nd Edition, 1722, London (Taylor) edition.
1220:
http://mind.ucsd.edu/syllabi/99_00/Empiricism/Readings/Encyc_Phil/Locke.html
700:
It's so nice to see you here on the English Knowledge — gratus apus nos! :)
866:
someone's taken out the material in books III and IV to put in jet life.
474: 456: 971:(known as "Abubacer" or "Ebn Tophail" in the West) had an influence on 836:. I'm beginning to see how this can indeed spiral out of control... ;) 131:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to 504:. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can 352: 325: 617:
That one appears on the first edition cover as well. Uploading now.
103: 52: 939: 1226:
http://www.epistemelinks.com/Main/Philosophers.aspx?PhilCode=Lock
1090:
http://www.epistemelinks.com/Main/Philosophers.aspx?PhilCode=Lock
634:
Weird, we're still dealing with an adaptation... It's quoted as:
816:
You're totally right; in my haste, I blipped right over the the
428: 726: 15: 1095:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
427: 296: 280: 264: 248: 232: 216: 200: 1210:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1080:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1203: 1073: 993:
in which he depicted the development of the mind of a
380:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1248:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1132:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 601:
Talk:Some Thoughts Concerning Education#Latin quote
593:
Talk:Some Thoughts Concerning Education#Latin quote
183: 1353:High-importance philosophical literature articles 1428:High-importance philosophy of language articles 1413:High-importance philosophy of religion articles 516:. To improve this article, please refer to the 1398:High-importance philosophy of science articles 1234:This message was posted before February 2018. 1118:This message was posted before February 2018. 8: 1358:Philosophical literature task force articles 983:demonstrated the theory of tabula rasa as a 789:Further comments are original to this page. 1443:High-importance Modern philosophy articles 1433:Philosophy of language task force articles 1418:Philosophy of religion task force articles 1068:I have just modified one external link on 512:. To use this banner, please refer to the 451: 320: 180: 47: 1403:Philosophy of science task force articles 1348:C-Class philosophical literature articles 1198:I have just modified 2 external links on 762:Locke misremembered a lot of quotes; the 510:discuss matters related to book articles 1423:C-Class philosophy of language articles 1408:C-Class philosophy of religion articles 1200:An Essay Concerning Human Understanding 1070:An Essay Concerning Human Understanding 1030: 977:An Essay Concerning Human Understanding 650:My translation, you might find better: 518:relevant guideline for the type of work 453: 322: 49: 19: 1393:C-Class philosophy of science articles 141:about philosophy content on Knowledge. 1448:Modern philosophy task force articles 1368:High-importance epistemology articles 1307:quote from book IV in book II section 1107:to let others know (documentation at 709:FWIW, I don't see the new version as 7: 496:This article is within the scope of 374:This article is within the scope of 125:This article is within the scope of 1458:Low-importance Linguistics articles 1343:High-importance Philosophy articles 38:It is of interest to the following 1438:C-Class Modern philosophy articles 14: 1202:. Please take a moment to review 1072:. Please take a moment to review 975:'s formulation of tabula rasa in 439:Philosophy of language task force 394:Knowledge:WikiProject Linguistics 1463:WikiProject Linguistics articles 1373:Epistemology task force articles 483: 473: 455: 397:Template:WikiProject Linguistics 361: 351: 324: 147:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy 112: 102: 51: 20: 1383:High-importance ethics articles 1224:Corrected formatting/usage for 414:This article has been rated as 167:This article has been rated as 150:Template:WikiProject Philosophy 1: 1363:C-Class epistemology articles 1021:17:48, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 905:17:11, 19 November 2011 (UTC) 882:19:51, 12 November 2011 (UTC) 436:This article is supported by 388:and see a list of open tasks. 1453:C-Class Linguistics articles 1186:04:59, 12 October 2016 (UTC) 794:velle goes from vocative of 585:20:42, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 1338:C-Class Philosophy articles 1324:16:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC) 924:10:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 574:) 04:42, 14 September 2006. 526:Knowledge:WikiProject Books 1489: 1473:WikiProject Books articles 1388:Ethics task force articles 1265:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1195:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1149:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1065:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 952:Arabic philosophical novel 820:and went straight for the 780:00:57, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 750:00:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 683:00:11, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 665:23:15, 29 April 2007 (UTC) 622:21:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC) 613:19:25, 29 April 2007 (UTC) 529:Template:WikiProject Books 420:project's importance scale 173:project's importance scale 468: 435: 413: 346: 304: 288: 272: 256: 240: 224: 208: 179: 166: 97: 46: 1302:10:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC) 944:Philosophus Autodidactus 591:latin quote (moved from 210:Philosophical literature 1378:C-Class ethics articles 1191:External links modified 1061:External links modified 851:10:20, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 809:00:58, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 377:WikiProject Linguistics 184:Associated task forces: 1037:G. A. Russell (1994), 432: 337:Philosophy of language 301: 290:Philosophy of language 285: 274:Philosophy of religion 269: 253: 237: 221: 205: 128:WikiProject Philosophy 28:This article is rated 1468:C-Class Book articles 562:comment was added by 431: 300: 284: 268: 258:Philosophy of science 252: 236: 220: 204: 1246:regular verification 1130:regular verification 1013:William M. Connolley 959:by the 12th century 400:Linguistics articles 1236:After February 2018 1120:After February 2018 1099:parameter below to 965:Islamic philosopher 153:Philosophy articles 1290:InternetArchiveBot 1241:InternetArchiveBot 1174:InternetArchiveBot 1125:InternetArchiveBot 985:thought experiment 642:But Cicero wrote: 433: 369:Linguistics portal 302: 286: 270: 254: 238: 222: 206: 138:general discussion 34:content assessment 1266: 1150: 872:comment added by 807: 798:to imfinitive of 740: 739: 663: 611: 575: 548: 547: 544: 543: 540: 539: 500:WikiProject Books 450: 449: 446: 445: 319: 318: 315: 314: 311: 310: 306:Modern philosophy 120:Philosophy portal 1480: 1300: 1291: 1264: 1263: 1242: 1184: 1175: 1148: 1147: 1126: 1114: 1053: 1043:Brill Publishers 1035: 884: 806: 727: 711:totaliter aliter 662: 610: 557: 534: 533: 530: 527: 524: 506:join the project 493: 488: 487: 477: 470: 469: 459: 452: 402: 401: 398: 395: 392: 371: 366: 365: 355: 348: 347: 342: 339: 328: 321: 191: 181: 155: 154: 151: 148: 145: 122: 117: 116: 115: 106: 99: 98: 93: 90: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 1488: 1487: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1328: 1327: 1309: 1294: 1289: 1257: 1250:have permission 1240: 1208:this simple FaQ 1193: 1178: 1173: 1141: 1134:have permission 1124: 1108: 1078:this simple FaQ 1063: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1041:, pp. 224-262, 1036: 1032: 990:Hayy ibn Yaqzan 956:Hayy ibn Yaqzan 938:A 17th century 931: 912: 890: 867: 864: 790: 775:page, I think. 603: 597: 558:—The preceding 553: 531: 528: 525: 522: 521: 489: 482: 399: 396: 393: 390: 389: 367: 360: 340: 334: 189: 169:High-importance 152: 149: 146: 143: 142: 118: 113: 111: 92:High‑importance 91: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 1486: 1484: 1476: 1475: 1470: 1465: 1460: 1455: 1450: 1445: 1440: 1435: 1430: 1425: 1420: 1415: 1410: 1405: 1400: 1395: 1390: 1385: 1380: 1375: 1370: 1365: 1360: 1355: 1350: 1345: 1340: 1330: 1329: 1308: 1305: 1284: 1283: 1276: 1229: 1228: 1222: 1214:Added archive 1192: 1189: 1168: 1167: 1160: 1093: 1092: 1084:Added archive 1062: 1059: 1055: 1054: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1008: 1007: 948:Edward Pococke 946:(published by 930: 927: 911: 908: 889: 886: 874:144.82.187.222 863: 860: 856: 855: 854: 853: 840: 839: 838: 837: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 755: 754: 753: 752: 738: 737: 734: 731: 725: 724: 723: 722: 717: 716: 715: 714: 704: 703: 702: 701: 692: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 656: 655: 654: 648: 647: 646: 640: 639: 638: 627: 626: 625: 624: 598: 596: 589: 588: 587: 552: 549: 546: 545: 542: 541: 538: 537: 535: 495: 494: 478: 466: 465: 460: 448: 447: 444: 443: 434: 424: 423: 416:Low-importance 412: 406: 405: 403: 386:the discussion 373: 372: 356: 344: 343: 341:Low‑importance 329: 317: 316: 313: 312: 309: 308: 303: 293: 292: 287: 277: 276: 271: 261: 260: 255: 245: 244: 239: 229: 228: 223: 213: 212: 207: 197: 196: 194: 192: 186: 185: 177: 176: 165: 159: 158: 156: 124: 123: 107: 95: 94: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1485: 1474: 1471: 1469: 1466: 1464: 1461: 1459: 1456: 1454: 1451: 1449: 1446: 1444: 1441: 1439: 1436: 1434: 1431: 1429: 1426: 1424: 1421: 1419: 1416: 1414: 1411: 1409: 1406: 1404: 1401: 1399: 1396: 1394: 1391: 1389: 1386: 1384: 1381: 1379: 1376: 1374: 1371: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1361: 1359: 1356: 1354: 1351: 1349: 1346: 1344: 1341: 1339: 1336: 1335: 1333: 1326: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1306: 1304: 1303: 1298: 1293: 1292: 1281: 1277: 1274: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1261: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1237: 1232: 1227: 1223: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1196: 1190: 1188: 1187: 1182: 1177: 1176: 1165: 1161: 1158: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1145: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1121: 1116: 1112: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1066: 1060: 1051: 1050:90-04-09459-8 1048: 1044: 1040: 1034: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1006: 1004: 1000: 999:desert island 996: 991: 988: 986: 982: 976: 974: 970: 967:and novelist 966: 962: 957: 954: 953: 949: 943: 941: 936: 935: 934: 928: 926: 925: 921: 917: 909: 907: 906: 902: 898: 893: 888:Books 3 and 4 887: 885: 883: 879: 875: 871: 861: 859: 852: 849: 844: 843: 842: 841: 835: 831: 827: 823: 819: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 805: 801: 797: 781: 778: 774: 770: 765: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 751: 748: 744: 743: 742: 741: 732: 728: 721: 720: 719: 718: 712: 708: 707: 706: 705: 699: 698:Salve, Ioshe! 696: 695: 694: 693: 684: 681: 677: 673: 668: 667: 666: 661: 657: 652: 651: 649: 644: 643: 641: 636: 635: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 623: 620: 616: 615: 614: 609: 605: 604: 602: 594: 590: 586: 583: 578: 577: 576: 573: 569: 565: 564:85.176.165.45 561: 551:needs editing 550: 536: 532:Book articles 519: 515: 514:documentation 511: 507: 503: 502: 501: 492: 486: 481: 479: 476: 472: 471: 467: 464: 461: 458: 454: 441: 440: 430: 426: 425: 421: 417: 411: 408: 407: 404: 387: 383: 379: 378: 370: 364: 359: 357: 354: 350: 349: 345: 338: 333: 330: 327: 323: 307: 299: 295: 294: 291: 283: 279: 278: 275: 267: 263: 262: 259: 251: 247: 246: 243: 235: 231: 230: 227: 219: 215: 214: 211: 203: 199: 198: 195: 193: 188: 187: 182: 178: 174: 170: 164: 161: 160: 157: 140: 139: 134: 130: 129: 121: 110: 108: 105: 101: 100: 96: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 1314: 1310: 1288: 1285: 1260:source check 1239: 1233: 1230: 1197: 1194: 1172: 1169: 1144:source check 1123: 1117: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1094: 1067: 1064: 1038: 1033: 1025: 1009: 992: 978: 958: 945: 942:translation 937: 932: 913: 894: 891: 868:— Preceding 865: 857: 833: 829: 825: 821: 817: 799: 795: 791: 772: 768: 763: 710: 697: 675: 671: 556:information. 554: 498: 497: 491:Books portal 437: 415: 375: 226:Epistemology 168: 136: 126: 68:Epistemology 40:WikiProjects 1316:8.37.27.136 1111:Sourcecheck 995:feral child 933:I took out 929:Influences? 862:vandalized. 599:Moved from 391:Linguistics 382:linguistics 332:Linguistics 1332:Categories 1297:Report bug 1181:Report bug 1026:References 1003:experience 1001:, through 981:Ibn Tufail 973:John Locke 969:Ibn Tufail 961:Andalusian 834:Bartlett's 144:Philosophy 133:philosophy 64:Literature 59:Philosophy 1280:this tool 1273:this tool 1164:this tool 1157:this tool 950:) of the 910:Citations 822:confiteri 1286:Cheers.— 1170:Cheers.— 987:through 870:unsigned 826:verbatim 796:Velleius 777:Awadewit 680:Awadewit 619:Awadewit 582:Awadewit 572:contribs 560:unsigned 84:Language 80:Religion 1204:my edit 1097:checked 1074:my edit 418:on the 171:on the 76:Science 30:C-class 1105:failed 1005:alone. 916:Myrvin 897:Gacggt 848:Willow 804:Ioshus 747:Willow 660:Ioshus 608:Ioshus 242:Ethics 88:Modern 72:Ethics 36:scale. 940:Latin 830:Essay 818:velle 773:Essay 769:Essay 764:Essay 676:Essay 672:Essay 523:Books 463:Books 1320:talk 1101:true 1047:ISBN 1017:talk 920:talk 901:talk 878:talk 800:volo 568:talk 508:and 163:High 1254:RfC 1218:to 1138:RfC 1115:). 1103:or 1088:to 793:--> 410:Low 1334:: 1322:) 1267:. 1262:}} 1258:{{ 1151:. 1146:}} 1142:{{ 1113:}} 1109:{{ 1045:, 1019:) 979:. 922:) 903:) 880:) 736:” 730:“ 678:. 570:• 335:: 190:/ 86:/ 82:/ 78:/ 74:/ 70:/ 66:/ 62:: 1318:( 1299:) 1295:( 1282:. 1275:. 1183:) 1179:( 1166:. 1159:. 1052:. 1015:( 963:- 918:( 899:( 876:( 595:) 566:( 520:. 442:. 422:. 175:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Philosophy
Literature
Epistemology
Ethics
Science
Religion
Language
Modern
WikiProject icon
Philosophy portal
WikiProject Philosophy
philosophy
general discussion
High
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
Philosophical literature
Taskforce icon
Epistemology
Taskforce icon
Ethics
Taskforce icon
Philosophy of science
Taskforce icon
Philosophy of religion
Taskforce icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑