1193:: 1. “However, this is rarely taken as a literal definition: many modern-day Jungian practitioners believe that every person has both an anima and an animus;” and, 2. “Jung stated that the anima and animus act as guides to the unconscious unified Self, and that forming an awareness and a connection with the anima or animus is one of the most difficult and rewarding steps in psychological growth. Jung reported that he identified his anima as she spoke to him, as an inner voice, unexpectedly one day.” These sentences were exact copies of the information in this citation I added. It would be helpful if editors can also verify the content if they have access to sources and paraphrase accordingly if similar incidents occur. Thanks.
276:: I don't have the technical expertise to address this substantively, but my understanding of academics generally is that in any field finer and finer distinctions are made: natural philosophy yields biology yields botany yields mycology, etc. As the field extends beyond Jung, the phrase "Jungian psychology" will become more and more historically specific, and suspect that the Jungian article should stay focussed on Jung and that this article should develop sub-sections as distinctions and schools within the discipline warrant it.
31:
498:...can someone explain and expand the relationship between Freud and Jung more in detail? I'm still trying to figure out what they differ on, and this article hasn't really helped. How is analytical psychology different from Freudian psychology? Or is that section dealt with in some other article like
1169:
This article has a few pretty long quotes that I feel should be explained more and also from what I understand
Knowledge is a place that is more about describing the work rather than posting quotes from the author. There are also many points through the article that other have added a citation needed
539:
really surprised to find all this matter about Jung and his psychology without even a brief reference to the fact that most clinical psychologists today consider the man to have been a mystical nutter and his school of thought completely pseudoscientific. Jungianism is an occult movement, not part of
210:
I would like to create an article on depth psychology, but
Knowledge already has in place a redirect straight into Analytical Psychology, with an incorrect statement that depth psychology is another term for AP. I hold a PhD in depth psych, and AP is really only one branch of it. I will correct the
1232:
I don't know if it's just me, but I've read the article and it seems there is a bias toward Jung in this article? Especially the criticism bit. It lacks mention of the lack of empirical evidence for
Jungian Psychology despite it being so old. I'll admit that I'm not an experienced editor, but the
181:
As a specific request, would someone mind rewriting the introductory paragraph? It seems rather awkward. The paragraph starts with a sentence about the creator, then his followers, moves on to what
Analytical psychology is NOT, and concludes with a more complex than necessary set of sentences.
171:
This article needs a lot of work. An extensive rewrite for a more encyclopedic style, organization and elaboration. I'm willing to contribute. I have tagged the article as I thought the overall quality was quite poor. I think that the only way we could do this is by including only referenced
575:
Is it the role of an encyclopedia to push a pure positives paradigm of the social sciences? I would imagine that pointing out his ontological, epistemological and methodological assumptions would be the most encyclopedic and NPOV manner in which to handle questions of difference in theory.
702:
The following sentence in the article's "Shadow" section 1) inaccurately characterizes what the source says and 2) is not a complete sentence. I don't have time right now to fix this sentence, so this is a placemarker for later work. Anyone else feel free to fix this sentence. Thanks.
826:
I realize that this is an article about a specialty within a field and that it can't be expected to be all at the layman's level. However, even having read quite a bit about psychology the lead is nearly meaningless even after reading the leads of the articles it is linked to.
388:, added Wikilinks). No article on any one of these individuals can reasonably discuss the myriad comparisons and contrasts among these theorists. However, such discussion would be completely appropriate in an article about depth psychology--an idea that is simply
1212:
Having begun drawing on the French wikipedia article (deemed "article de qualité") on this topic, I intend to continue, as time allows, inserting
English language sources as appropriate. This should not prevent other bilingual editors from joining
682:
article, the archetype is an "ancient or archaic images that derive from the collective unconscious". As far as I know, only collective aspects of unconscious can be refered as archetypes. If it is individual, it is not an archetype by definition.
707:
The shadow may also concern great figures in the history of human thought or even spiritual masters, who became great just because their shadows or their possibility of living shadows, namely, their unconscious faults, in full, without repressing
311:
talk page in response to the Carl Jung/Jungian Psych merge suggestion. it seems like a more appropriate suggestion to merge analytical and jungian psych, so i thought i'd see where the discussion went on this idea. i will also post this on the
642:
A man who acts aggressively and never cries still acts irrationaly, thus he has an Anima, but of course, wouldn't be in contact with it. If he wasn't in contact wih the Anima, wouldn't that state he'd be rational and responsible all the time?
364:: Evidently the articles have become de-merged since this debate transpired, and I'd like to propose that they be kept that way. Depth psychology is an umbrella term, encompassing "the ongoing development of theories and therapies pioneered by
238:: Depth psychology is an umbrella term to describe several different theories and clinical practices. To merge depth psychology into Analytical psychology would falsely portray the Jungian approach as the sole approach disavowing the others.
280:
is a good example of this where diverse articles were created and then had to be united after the fact. In general, I suspect the time to split is when the table of contents exceeds a dozen items or the text is 20K or larger. -
415:"Jung's spelling is "extravert," which most dictionaries use; the variant "extrovert" is not preferred" -- is this really pertinent to the article? I came to learn about analytical psychology, not to learn about grammar!
1131:
Is it appropriate to have a photo of a couch (just below the portrait of Jung) in this article, when Jung (unlike Freud) preferred to have people sit on chairs so that he could talk to them face-to-face?
1189:
While trying to add citations to unsourced information, I found that there are parts that have exact wordings from texts. For instance, there are the cases of these unquoted texts in the
154:
758:, that have the same box. However, if you would like to insert a Jung-related picture, that would of course be great. One place to find these pictures is of course in our article on
434:
This article needs lots of references, can the editors pls consider adding the same... when I get sometime, I will definitely add them, but busy for now... Keep up the good work.
479:
I use Jung's work on this frequently, to good effect, in "Secure Units". I can witness to the value of his work here. I did not notice his work on it in the article page?
731:
Hi. Why is this article illustrated with a photo of the Freud's museum? I'd suggest to change it to something Jung-related. (Haven't figured out the photo editing yet)
554:
This has nothing to do with science at all- I suggest that this article is deleted or rewritten as a whole, because it contains no empirical information whatsover
1150:
The removal of large sections, mostly unsubstantiated, is both necessary as it was highly misleading and is in preparation for accurate editing of this material.--
1073:
1069:
1055:
922:
918:
904:
263:
Each article appears to have been written by editors w/out knowledge of the other. At least some X-ref & show relationship/develoment or possibly merge. --
297:
certain. I'll look more closely at this when I have time and see if I can help. I have some knowledge of this area and some good books I can refer to. --
328:, having suggested it at Talk:Carl Jung. If anyone's concern is technical expertise, I have it. I teach Jung every spring in my Personality course.
1170:
so those should be looked into and either given a reference or removed. The references should also be checked to make sure they are all correct.
186:"Analytical psychology is the study of (X) through (THESE METHODS), and was theorized by Carl Jung in his seminal work (SEMINAL WORK(S) HERE)."
338:
804:
460:
561:
606:
It would be far better, and truer to an
Encyclopaedia, to have another article page on the other types of psychology or epistomology.
662:
182:
Someone who actually understands the subject better than I would be greatly thanked if they rewrote the opening sentence in the form:
1051:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
593:
135:
106:
253:
823:
Is it possible to rephrase much of the lead section to be understandable to people without a background in the subject?
1116:
965:
307:
it looks like this has been discussed some already with ambiguous results, but it was brought up a couple times on the
863:
150:
611:
484:
47:
38:
17:
211:
AP article, but is there any way to get around the redirect so I can create a new article on depth psych? Thx --
751:
1072:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
921:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
808:
464:
1107:
1029:
1021:
995:
956:
855:
832:
658:
565:
214:
110:
1175:
873:
688:
581:
401:
1091:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1079:
1013:
940:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
928:
847:
607:
597:
480:
131:
1020:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
854:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
836:
736:
684:
654:
158:
1238:
1198:
898:
800:
750:! The picture belongs to the box "Part of a series of articles on Psychoanalysis" - see for instance
650:
557:
456:
241:
190:
123:
102:
1214:
1151:
503:
1218:
1155:
772:
678:
Is it ok to talk about an "individual archetype"? Or about creating an archetype? According to the
507:
352:
317:
298:
245:
203:
The help desk mailing list has received a mailing list from a man who has completed a doctorate in
85:
453:
I removed the link "Jung Films- Rare
Interviews" as it appeared to link to a commercial website.
1264:
991:
828:
679:
313:
249:
1076:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
925:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1092:
941:
153:
is being nominated for a rename to
Category:Analytical psychology. Comments are welcome at its
99:
shouldn't articles across wikipedia about jung respectfully spell extraversion the way he did?
1242:
1222:
1202:
1179:
1171:
1159:
1140:
1121:
999:
970:
812:
779:
740:
721:
717:
692:
666:
615:
601:
585:
577:
569:
549:
530:
511:
488:
468:
443:
424:
420:
405:
397:
355:
345:
332:
320:
301:
285:
267:
257:
229:
193:
176:
161:
139:
114:
88:
1136:
980:
747:
732:
526:
439:
204:
173:
127:
1099:
948:
1277:
1234:
1194:
755:
545:
282:
277:
264:
226:
339:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Psychology#Proposal_to_merge_Jungian_psychology_with_Carl_Jung
1058:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
987:
907:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
791:
763:
293:: I think these terms are used interchangably and likely should be merged, but I'm not
1098:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
947:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
636:
But then further states that Animus is the rational mind and Anima is the irrational.
377:
369:
342:
329:
864:
https://web.archive.org/web/20040426092913/http://www.israjung.co.il:80/edinger.htm
713:
416:
381:
365:
1132:
1065:
914:
630:
There was one question I wished to ask when reading about the Animus and Anima.
522:
435:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1064:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
913:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
541:
976:
499:
373:
308:
1290:
1190:
990:
features arguments for either variation. Greater participation is invited.
1030:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070218003526/http://www.jungianstudies.org/
1039:
867:
874:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070405050524/http://www.jungarena.com:80/
385:
224:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Depth_psychology&redirect=no
633:
One line says: "(e.g. a man who acts aggressively and never cries)"
846:
Hello fellow
Wikipedians, I have just modified 2 external links on
1233:
article seems to be a little biased to defend
Jungian Psychology.
1127:
Is it appropriate to have a photograph of a couch in this article?
1033:
759:
521:
How about a section of criticisms of analytical psychology? --
25:
1045:
883:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
877:
1291:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Analytical_psychology#cite_note-31
592:
I have added an empty Criticisms section to be filled out.
1024:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
858:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
120:
Well I think he wrote that in German and not in English?
639:
I feel it bears some contradiction in it's explanation.
1017:
851:
223:
1068:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
917:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
646:It begs for a bit more explanation in my opinion.
337:Merge completed per discussion here, there, and at
903:). This message was posted before February 2018.
396:condensible into a footnote to depth psychology.
1054:This message was posted before February 2018.
988:Talk:Carl Jung#Requested move 14 November 2016
8:
819:Can the lead be explained in layman's terms?
392:equivalent to Jungian depth psychology, and
790:What about writing something nice here? --
100:
1012:I have just modified 3 external links on
797:And wilhelm reich isn't even mentioned?
1247:
1273:
1262:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1040:http://www.israjung.co.il/edinger.htm
895:to let others know (documentation at
868:http://www.israjung.co.il/edinger.htm
199:Proposed merger with depth psychology
95:spelling of extroversion/extraversion
7:
386:http://www.terrapsych.com/depth.html
986:The discussion currently active at
74:Some concepts to be elaborated on:
1272:Cite has empty unknown parameter:
24:
1255:Arena, Leonardo Vittorio (2013).
1165:Suggestions for Improving Article
1016:. Please take a moment to review
850:. Please take a moment to review
29:
1044:Corrected formatting/usage for
1038:Corrected formatting/usage for
1034:http://www.jungianstudies.org/
194:23:33, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
1180:17:44, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
1000:20:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
693:17:58, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
517:Feminist and Other Critiques?
444:06:57, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
356:21:19, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
346:07:14, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
333:07:07, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
321:01:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
302:13:40, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
162:18:09, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
1243:13:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
1223:13:55, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
1160:02:05, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
971:09:01, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
837:22:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
667:19:06, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
602:11:44, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
550:21:17, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
512:11:42, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
469:23:31, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
425:02:05, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
286:17:00, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
268:21:20, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
230:21:20, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
115:22:10, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
1191:Anima and animus subsection
1141:18:33, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
813:00:22, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
570:11:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
540:the science of psychology.
258:16:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
151:Category:Jungian psychology
146:Category:Jungian psychology
78:The psychological archetype
1309:
1257:The Shadows of the Masters
1203:23:25, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
1085:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1009:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
934:(last update: 5 June 2024)
780:09:51, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
626:About the Animus and Anima
531:15:01, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
140:16:36, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
18:Talk:Analytical psychology
1046:http://www.jungarena.com/
878:http://www.jungarena.com/
762:. With friendly regards,
752:Relational psychoanalysis
586:00:19, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
1122:14:27, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
794:07:19, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
741:22:57, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
616:22:04, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
489:15:02, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
475:Constructive Imagination
406:10:26, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1005:External links modified
842:External links modified
722:15:42, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
215:User:Capitalistroadster
177:00:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
89:00:52, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
818:
411:Extravert vs Extrovert
1014:Analytical psychology
848:Analytical psychology
674:Individual archetypes
362:Strongly oppose merge
42:of past discussions.
1066:regular verification
915:regular verification
698:Sentence to be fixed
494:Good article, but...
1056:After February 2018
905:After February 2018
887:parameter below to
351:Sweet, thanks much.
1110:InternetArchiveBot
1061:InternetArchiveBot
959:InternetArchiveBot
910:InternetArchiveBot
680:Jungian archetypes
314:Jungian psychology
274:Oppose but Abstain
222:Edit the redirect
1086:
998:
935:
803:comment added by
670:
653:comment added by
560:comment added by
459:comment added by
260:
244:comment added by
218:
167:Considerable work
126:comment added by
117:
105:comment added by
67:
66:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1300:
1293:
1288:
1282:
1281:
1275:
1270:
1268:
1260:
1252:
1120:
1111:
1084:
1083:
1062:
996:(talk)(contribs)
994:
981:Carl Gustav Jung
969:
960:
933:
932:
911:
902:
815:
777:
776:
770:
769:
669:
647:
572:
542:Martin Rundkvist
471:
430:Needs references
239:
212:
205:depth psychology
142:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1308:
1307:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1289:
1285:
1271:
1261:
1254:
1253:
1249:
1230:
1228:Potential bias?
1210:
1187:
1167:
1148:
1129:
1114:
1109:
1077:
1070:have permission
1060:
1022:this simple FaQ
1007:
984:
963:
958:
926:
919:have permission
909:
896:
856:this simple FaQ
844:
821:
798:
788:
774:
773:
765:
764:
756:Self psychology
729:
700:
676:
648:
628:
555:
519:
496:
477:
454:
451:
449:Commercial link
432:
413:
384:" (quoted from
201:
191:MyOwnLittlWorld
169:
155:discussion page
148:
121:
97:
72:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1306:
1304:
1295:
1294:
1283:
1246:
1229:
1226:
1209:
1206:
1186:
1183:
1166:
1163:
1147:
1144:
1128:
1125:
1104:
1103:
1096:
1049:
1048:
1042:
1036:
1028:Added archive
1006:
1003:
992:—Roman Spinner
983:
974:
953:
952:
945:
881:
880:
872:Added archive
870:
862:Added archive
843:
840:
820:
817:
805:72.235.150.194
787:
784:
783:
782:
728:
725:
710:
709:
699:
696:
675:
672:
627:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
619:
618:
590:
589:
588:
518:
515:
502:or something?
495:
492:
476:
473:
461:137.122.47.225
450:
447:
431:
428:
412:
409:
359:
358:
353:Acornwithwings
318:Acornwithwings
305:
304:
288:
278:Men's movement
233:
232:
200:
197:
188:
187:
168:
165:
147:
144:
96:
93:
92:
91:
82:
79:
71:
68:
65:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1305:
1292:
1287:
1284:
1279:
1266:
1258:
1251:
1248:
1245:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1227:
1225:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1207:
1205:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1184:
1182:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1164:
1162:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1145:
1143:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1126:
1124:
1123:
1118:
1113:
1112:
1101:
1097:
1094:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1081:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1057:
1052:
1047:
1043:
1041:
1037:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1010:
1004:
1002:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
982:
978:
975:
973:
972:
967:
962:
961:
950:
946:
943:
939:
938:
937:
930:
924:
920:
916:
912:
906:
900:
894:
890:
886:
879:
875:
871:
869:
865:
861:
860:
859:
857:
853:
849:
841:
839:
838:
834:
830:
829:Arbalest Mike
824:
816:
814:
810:
806:
802:
795:
793:
785:
781:
778:
771:
768:
761:
757:
753:
749:
745:
744:
743:
742:
738:
734:
726:
724:
723:
719:
715:
706:
705:
704:
697:
695:
694:
690:
686:
681:
673:
671:
668:
664:
660:
656:
652:
644:
640:
637:
634:
631:
625:
617:
613:
609:
605:
604:
603:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
574:
573:
571:
567:
563:
562:62.195.52.159
559:
553:
552:
551:
547:
543:
538:
535:
534:
533:
532:
528:
524:
516:
514:
513:
509:
505:
501:
493:
491:
490:
486:
482:
474:
472:
470:
466:
462:
458:
448:
446:
445:
441:
437:
429:
427:
426:
422:
418:
410:
408:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
378:Sigmund Freud
375:
371:
370:William James
367:
363:
357:
354:
350:
349:
348:
347:
344:
340:
335:
334:
331:
327:
326:Support merge
323:
322:
319:
315:
310:
303:
300:
296:
292:
289:
287:
284:
279:
275:
272:
271:
270:
269:
266:
261:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
237:
231:
228:
225:
221:
220:
219:
216:
208:
206:
198:
196:
195:
192:
185:
184:
183:
179:
178:
175:
166:
164:
163:
160:
156:
152:
145:
143:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
118:
116:
112:
108:
104:
94:
90:
87:
83:
80:
77:
76:
75:
69:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1286:
1256:
1250:
1231:
1211:
1208:Improvements
1188:
1185:Paraphrasing
1172:Brian Dooley
1168:
1149:
1146:Spring clean
1130:
1108:
1105:
1080:source check
1059:
1053:
1050:
1011:
1008:
985:
957:
954:
929:source check
908:
892:
888:
884:
882:
845:
825:
822:
799:— Preceding
796:
789:
766:
730:
727:Illustration
711:
701:
685:Ale murakami
677:
655:DarkDisguise
649:— Preceding
645:
641:
638:
635:
632:
629:
536:
520:
497:
478:
452:
433:
414:
398:Cosmic Latte
393:
389:
382:Alfred Adler
366:Pierre Janet
361:
360:
336:
325:
324:
316:talk page.
306:
294:
290:
273:
262:
235:
234:
209:
202:
189:
180:
170:
159:Samuel Grant
149:
122:— Preceding
119:
101:— Preceding
98:
73:
60:
43:
37:
899:Sourcecheck
594:93.96.236.8
556:—Preceding
455:—Preceding
240:—Preceding
174:Supernaut76
172:material.
128:Kammerbulle
107:24.95.85.51
84:The Self —
36:This is an
1235:MrMisterer
1195:Darwin Naz
1117:Report bug
966:Report bug
608:MacOfJesus
481:MacOfJesus
374:C. G. Jung
295:completely
283:Rorybowman
265:Paul foord
227:Paul foord
213:[[anon by
1265:cite book
1215:Po Mieczu
1152:Po Mieczu
1100:this tool
1093:this tool
977:Carl Jung
949:this tool
942:this tool
792:pippo2001
767:Lova Falk
578:-RSaylors
537:Yes, I am
504:Squarrels
500:Carl_Jung
309:Carl Jung
61:Archive 1
1259:. ebook.
1106:Cheers.—
955:Cheers.—
801:unsigned
786:Untitled
748:Cosainsé
733:Cosainsé
663:contribs
651:unsigned
558:unsigned
457:unsigned
343:Doczilla
330:Doczilla
299:DanielCD
291:Possible
254:contribs
246:Cshelley
242:unsigned
217:6 Dec 05
136:contribs
124:unsigned
103:unsigned
1018:my edit
885:checked
852:my edit
714:Rednblu
417:Twipley
81:The ego
39:archive
1133:Vorbee
893:failed
523:Tedlau
436:Bluptr
380:, and
236:Oppose
1213:in.--
708:them.
70:To do
16:<
1278:help
1239:talk
1219:talk
1199:talk
1176:talk
1156:talk
1137:talk
889:true
833:talk
809:talk
775:talk
760:Jung
737:talk
718:talk
689:talk
659:talk
612:talk
598:talk
582:talk
566:talk
546:talk
527:talk
508:talk
485:talk
465:talk
440:talk
421:talk
402:talk
250:talk
132:talk
111:talk
1274:|1=
1074:RfC
1032:to
979:or
923:RfC
891:or
876:to
866:to
754:or
746:Hi
712:--
394:not
390:not
207:.
86:Sam
1269::
1267:}}
1263:{{
1241:)
1221:)
1201:)
1178:)
1158:)
1139:)
1087:.
1082:}}
1078:{{
936:.
931:}}
927:{{
901:}}
897:{{
835:)
811:)
739:)
720:)
691:)
683:--
665:)
661:•
614:)
600:)
584:)
568:)
548:)
529:)
510:)
487:)
467:)
442:)
423:)
404:)
376:,
372:,
368:,
341:.
256:)
252:•
157:.
138:)
134:•
113:)
1280:)
1276:(
1237:(
1217:(
1197:(
1174:(
1154:(
1135:(
1119:)
1115:(
1102:.
1095:.
968:)
964:(
951:.
944:.
831:(
807:(
735:(
716:(
687:(
657:(
610:(
596:(
580:(
564:(
544:(
525:(
506:(
483:(
463:(
438:(
419:(
400:(
248:(
130:(
109:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.