Talk:Animal cognition - Knowledge (XXG)

3453:(such as might happen in France concerning the French language). It is rather that the language simply evolved this way because the people using it recognised that the qualification, "non-human", was generally understood in the relevant contexts and was therefore unnecessary. There are many such tacit simplifications of the language, and generally it is better and more elegant as a result of these simplifications. However, this particular issue arises occasionally in the context of various animal articles, with some users wanting to enforce the literal and more rigid regime and wanting the qualification to be made explicit at every mention of the word "animal". Personally, I find that tiresome and clunky. I don't think Knowledge (XXG) has a formal policy requiring the language to conform to common usage in this case (is that really necessary?). Personally, I think the qualification "non-animal" should be mentioned once, and once only, in the lead sentence of the animal articles where the qualification is relevant. This is a position which has received some measure of consensus in recent discussions. Accordingly, I have removed the multiple qualifications you made throughout the article, but retained the first qualification in the lead. If you want to keep worrying at the issue and force a more formal decision then I suggest you open a discussion at the 2385:

it goes... you two both seem to enjoy whatever meaning you get out of life with this endless sparring with each other. My main objection is that, put together, the two of you are just plain inefficient, endlessly huffing and puffing at each other with hundreds (thousands?) of edits, wasting Knowledge (XXG) resources and the time of other editors who try to process the driveling, yet adding next to nothing of value to Knowledge (XXG). Anyway, I've added the reference as an external link, and when I have more time, if someone doesn't get in ahead, I'll expand the article using this source as an inspiration. --

890:

makes a big difference whether language is considered as essential for intelligence, for example). As a result, most scientists studying animal cognition regard questions about which animals are the most intelligent as vacuous." These claims are unsupported by any references, and in any case, are probably too broad to be justified without an exhaustive set of references anyway. I don't doubt that some scientists hold this view, but the claim that there is a consensus ought to be defended or done away with.

1148:

infantilism), and Neophemas cannot approach the African greys. Then there are individual species which rise above the pack. Every falconer I've met(all three) insists that Harris hawks are far smarter than other raptors, and human intelligence certainly exceeds that of Oranguatangs (though considering the state of the planet, some may dispute this). Since this is original research, and hearsay to boot, please don't add this to the article, these are just observations for what might be improved.

179: 158: 1007:

certainly say that humans are indeed the most cognitively complex organism on the planet, no argument there, but there are situations where a Clark's nutcracker kicks our butts (remembering spatial locations for long periods of time). So, does that make us smarter than them, or them smarter than us? This type of question really bogs down the study of animal cognition (which, I might add, is what the cool kids take in school....) I hope this helps some.

189: 562: 541: 1576:

necessary addition (but could probably use more attention). I used Brown & Cook as a reference only because it is a well-written and expert-reviewed source that is freely available online, and so it might be a good place to send people (rather than the Library, given that many of the people that use Knowledge (XXG) are using it for the express purpose that they don't have to leave their basement in order to get information).

74: 53: 495: 470: 3700: 655: 1384:

labyrint guided by written words. I have already tried it once with a promising result and I will put the video to YouTube too, maybe today. My rabbits are otherwise untrained and somewhat uncooperative. They are interested in new tasks and not in repeating the same old tricks. Food rewards do not seem to work. One of my rabbits is bold and the other one too timid for labyrinth tasks.

634: 2189:. ... Panzee doesn’t talk, but she knows a word when she hears one — even if it’s emitted by a computer with a synthetic speech impediment. That’s not too shabby for a chimpanzee. Raised to recognize 128 spoken words by pointing to corresponding symbols, Panzee perceives acoustically distorted words about as well as people do, say psychology graduate student Lisa Heimbauer of 22: 727: 980:

measure would certainly be rather whalocentric. But that doesn't automatically make it worthless. Whales do, in fact, have more blubber than other species, and that's a notable scientific fact. Similarly, under some objective definition of intelligence, humans may be particularly bright. That's anthropocentric, but why is it vacuous? This seems like POV to me.

2486:

Intelligence, 1911), Yerkes (Dancing Mouse, 1907), and to "recent observations" by Forel, whose major work on ants was published in 1923. Not mentioned are scientific findings from the past 80 years which greatly expand our knowledge of the animal mind. Thus a reference to the Catholic article seems somewhat irrelvant to a modern scientific account.

306: 2579:

animals have personalities. Anyone with 2 dogs or 2 cats will know that they have differerent personalities, e.g. inquistive or non-inquisitive, which can easily be objectively quantified to show neophilic or neophobic tendencies, i.e. personalities. If the dismissal of personality is discussed, it should be done in the past tense.__

84: 2042:, she has a good lead article in it that could be useful here. As I am rather busy it would be hard for me to devote time to it, but I can say that it is a pretty damned good paper and could be useful. Oh, full disclosure, I have an article in that issue, and I am a Shettleworth Phd, so well, there you are... 1678:

There are good reviews of spatial stuff out there. Miller and Shettleworth is good, there is a great Cheng et al one as well. The Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning is out, and it may be some use if you have access. It has entries on spatial cognition and spatial navigation (full disclosure,

1499:

This points out the whole problem with the 'subjective intelligence ranking of species' stuff on here. I do not see why it is relevant that people have a gut feeling that species X is smarter than species Y. The question itself, which may be silly, is at best a very difficult comparative question.

889:

The article asserts that "comparative psychologists have sought in vain for ways of providing an objective underpinning for these essentially subjective and anthropocentric judgements" and "part of the difficulty is the lack of agreement about what we mean by intelligence even in humans (it obviously

826:

It is not clear what the point of including this is. Transfer of training is a very general phenomenon - any animal that can learn anything at all will transfer some kind of learning to some kind of new task. Offhand, I can't think of anything that Yerkes showed about transfer in his 1916 book that

3471:

Thank you for your point of view. Yes, the mention in the lead does solve some of the clarification problem. Where I think "other" should also be added would be when the text reads "humans and animals" or similar variations which imply an apples-and-oranges definition, although the language in those

2578:

As an ethologist, I would argue that this is a very dated approach - perhaps indicated by the date of the conference to which you refer (it is 22 years old). Whilst the term 'personality' is potentially anthropocentric and discussion of relevant data could be anthropomorphic, there is no doubt that

2546:

I remember reading that at a 1991 ethological congress it was decided that the word "personality" should not be applied to animals because it is deemed anthropomorphic and the mere suggestion that animals might have personalities was a "crime of ethology". Where exactly would this go in the section?

2384:

as far as animal cognition is concerned. And monsieur 99.56.123.120, aka 97.87.29.188, aka 99.190.85.111 ad nauseum... you are equally exasperating. I don't know how many times I've asked you to get a proper account and stop your charade with the dynamic IPs. You two deserve each other. Still, there

1935:

I just read a bit of the article and I saw that section. I think its going in all direction and we are mixing differents things. I'm talking about the ants sections. Ants are clearly not intelligent even tough they can exibit intelligent behavior, but its not the same. The complex behavior come from

905:

Please see the reference by Shettleworth, 1998. I am pretty sure the original author of this section put the reference to Shettleworth at the end of the paragraph, indicating that the whole paragraph is pretty much from that book. There pretty much is consensus then, as this is pretty much the most

3452:

of the English language to use the term "animal" in such a way that in appropriate contexts it refers to non-human animals. The English language is full of tacit conventions like this. It is not that some formal committee sat down and decided that this is the way the English language should be used

2139:

Possibly an example of human activity advancing cognition this would be the learning of blue-tits to open milk-bottles left on the doorstep to drink the cream. This behaviour arose spontaneously in London and in the North-west of the UK, but spread country-wide through observational learning. The

1383:

Another question: From where and how to get an objective opinion about my rabbits being able to read some words? There is a film at www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qv49w6IrQaI. I have now taught them the words left, right, in front, back, above and down. So it should be possible to train them to perform a

1379:

A question: Has it been taken into account in the experiment arrangements that since the animals are at the mercy of humans they have to listen to subtle social cues very carefully compared to free adult humans? So their behaviour just has to be primarily social whether that is their nature or not.

1147:

From what I've heard from people who work with these various animals, (and from newspaper articles, which I tend not to trust on matters of science) the ranking seems more or less accurate. But the categories are so broad that it's difficult. Domestic dogs aren't as smart as wolves (selection for

1092:

That birds and bees can fly and humans can't isn't a scientifically noteworthy fact? That birds can fly is awfully useful if you want to know, say, how they migrate, or what ecological niche they fill. The point isn't to establish some kind of ladder, or hierarchy of worthiness (which I would agree

924:

That makes sense. The Shettleworth book probably is meant as the reference. Still, how does a lack of agreement about what we mean by "intelligence" comport with the alleged consensus that it essentially subjective? If there's no consensus on the meaning of the word, how can there be a consensus on

3423:

You recently added "other" in several places in this article to clarify that humans are animals. You may not be aware, but Knowledge (XXG) operates on the principle that the terms "human" and "animal" are mutually exclusive and no further explanation is needed in articles. I hate this, but it is

1623:

Outline: I would like to add more information regarding dogs, apes and cats. The first reference I listed is a relatively recent article that describes how apes and dogs differ in social and causal cues. The second reference is an older comparison of dogs and cats and their abilities to understand

1174:

Intelligence or cognitive ability if you will, is proably modular (see Galistell's Organization of Learning for a nice primer). Asking if say, a rat shows similar intellgence to a human is like asking if humans can fly by flapping their arms. There are several nice treatments of such 'rankings'

1077:

To expand on this, the idea of a ranking is not useful. We (humans) evolved filling our niche, Clark's nutcrackers fill theirs, and honey bees fill theirs. Both of those species fly better than we do (discounting airplanes....). Is that a useful comparison, flying ability? Not really I think.

956:

Subjective may in fact not be quite the right word, though anthropocentric is for sure. The idea is that really, as different species have different cognitive challenges, then, they should be adapted to solve them. Asking say, why are dolphins unable to use language (for example) is like asking,

747:

To whom ever is reading this. Hi my name is Zac Rogers and in the next few weeks Im going to do my best in editing and adding some things to this article. I am taking part in a History & Systems of Psychology Class at Shenandoah University. and we are doing a Knowledge (XXG) project. I will be

2120:

Oh yes, also: Id also like to know if there are any studies showing that human activity has advanced any animal cognition? Like, did we teach anything to make tools; stuff that would be obviously a significant mental act beyond simple survival or mimicry. Like, a math-ing horse show or a parrot i

1981:

or machine cognition, but have been less interested in including animal cognition in the analysis - despite the fact that the common biological origins of human and animal cognition suggest that there might be greater resemblance, at least in some respects, between human and animal cognition than

1403:

There are sources beyond WIkipedia. Try an intro psychology book, oh perhaps Glietman's text. Then perhaps look at Mike Domjan's Learning textbook, then W. A. Roberts' book 'Animal Cognition' or Sara Shettleworth's 'Cognition, Evolution and Behavior'. Like I said before, this is not really the

1151:

The one thing I will say for certain is that most of an owl's head is taken up by the eyes. And back to hearsay mode, at least one falconer I know makes a routine of insisting on their relatively low intelligence. They're certainly not up there with parrots, unless maybe you're talking something

1143:

It'd be interesting to see some studies. I concede that the research is too poorly conducted to say anything with authority. And though it mentions controversy over the relative intelligence of dogs and cats, at least it doesn't argue that either of them are "the smartest animals" (despite s few

3145:

There is nothing to purchase from the website, so perhaps it is not a commercial site. They have not filed an IRS 990 so despite the claim on their facebook page of being a non-profit, they are not, a non-profit. That doesn't mean the site is not reliable, it's just what it is, a collection of

2485:

The article referenced is in the Catholic Encyclopedia. It proposes a limited sort of animal rationality. To the extent that the article is based on empirical evidence, this evidence seems to be drawn from the early behavioristic history of animal cognition. Notably, it refers Thorndike (Animal

1575:

Hi all. I added the heading "Spatial Cognition", since it is probably one of the largest and most well-represented fields of Animal Cognition currently under investigation. I realize that some information in it has been referenced in other sections of the page, but I still feel as though it is a

1107:

I did not do a very good job explaining myself I guess. Intelligence is a multimodal thing. There are certain modules that we have, for example, that other species don't have. Now, why species A has some module and species B has another is interesting for sure! However, the idea that one is

1037:

Whether humans are more intelligent than a Clark's nutcracker depends on what the definition of 'intelligence' is. But if the fact that we can define that word lots of different ways with different results makes whatever particular definition we pick illegitimate, the reason escapes me. Why not

1006:

One of the big assumptions of the anthropocentric approach (the idea of ranking species) is that there is a sort of evolutionary ladder, which is of course counter to evolutionary theory (a good discussion of this is available in Campbell and Hodos, 1969, as well as Shettleworth, 1993). I will

979:

That makes sense. Certainly, species make different adaptations. It's just that the article seems to convey a sense that if a certain measure is anthropocentric, it is illegitimate or vacuous. This doesn't necessarily follow. For example, one might list species by their blubber content. Such a

1093:

is unscientific), but to tabulate the characteristics of different species and learn more about them. One thing we know about honey bees is that they fly. I am astonished to hear that this isn't a useful observation about them, or that our intelligence isn't a useful observation about humans.

1038:

define 'intelligence' as 'cognitive complexity?' Then humans are the most intelligent species on the planet. Why is the observation that humans are the most cognitively complex organism okay, but the observation that we are most intelligent, under some definition of that word, illegitimate?

879:

This whole "widely believed to be the smartest bird or ape or whaterver" bit is getting out of control. First of all it is full of weasel words. Secondly, the study of animal cognition is not about ranking species. Read the book I mention above, or pick up a copy of JEP:Animal and find me

762:

Hey Zac, I enjoyed peer reviewing your work. I found that a lot of what you wrote was from good research and it definitely shows that you took a lot of time into this project. I liked reading about your contributions in tools and weaponry. Your information was good and didn't make too many

2213:

and other nonhuman animals have been trained to identify acoustically altered words. In contrast, Panzee apparently generalized from past experience hearing caretakers talk to distinguish acoustically transformed words, Holt says. ... It’s not known whether any other animals have Panzee’s

1855:

I deleted the section on math and numerical cognition because it was rife with errors and overstated much of the research. For example, the types of numerosity judgments made by the monkeys in Cantlon, Brannon, and Terrace's work is clearly not counting, though it was sourced as such.

3434:

Hi, and thanks. I won't remove the edits, but would like to see the consensus, how old it is, and what the arguments were, as it seem counter-intuitive for encyclopedias - Wikipeda in particular - not to make such an obvious clarification. How did it get decided and closed that way?

1195:

Absolutely. I have taken an axe to it. I have also started putting in some of the admittedly necessary references (I wrote most of this page at a time when Knowledge (XXG) was not bothering so much about such things, and I didn't want to clutter it). Any help would be welcome!

748:

using some information from articles like this one, or this one, to do some of my research. Let me know what you guys think and if you have any comments or thoughts for me please don't be afraid to say them. Also any advice or help you can give me would also be very appreciated!

2218:

in Waltham, Mass., predicts that parrots could decipher highly distorted speech on their own. Wild parrots recognize species-specific and individual vocal calls in noisy forests, amid cacophonous flocks of comrades, comments Pepperberg, who studies thinking and communication in

1398:

Thanks, but I didn't find that point about BF Skinner and reading pigeons from the Knowledge (XXG), now even from under the header rumours about BF Skinner. And could you please include information about who and where are capable of testing animals' intelligence objectively.

1989:

Those psychologists who are committed to radical behaviorism and the experimental analysis of behaviour discount cognitive analyses of animal behavior. This is not surprising since for the most part they also reject cognitive analyses of human behaviour. It is perhaps a

1970:

Particular issues within animal cognition, particularly the interpretation of language-learning and self-awareness experiments, have generated major controversies both about the extent of the animals' achievements, and about the correct interpretation of the behavior

2405:

Why does 'Animal Sentience' redirect to this page? Animal sentience is about the capacity of animals to experience negative and positive emotional states. This is not even discussed in 'Animal cognition' and surely deserves a page separate to 'Animal cognition'.

3676:“Though generally dismissed in the paleontology community, Mark McMenamin published in the 21st Century Science & Technology that fossils from several dead Ichthyosaurs is evidence of an intelligent Triassic cephalopod creating a primitive self-portrait.“ 1782:? "some species" include squids and humans. Are "most researchers" claiming "intelligence" is so relative that a squid needs to be judged as having as much "squid-intelligence" as a human or chimp are endowed with human- or chimp-intelligence? This sounds 1520:

Is it possible in theory to teach a dog or any other animal to read without it taking enermous lenghts of time? See the video of a dog puppy reading at www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyiE2DmpCZY and please read the text too: it offers one possible explanation.

2506:

I'm wondering whether the section titled 'Mathematics' should really be 'Numeracy'. All the examples appear to be about the concepts of 'larger or smaller', or 'more or less', rather than adding, subtracting, etc. so I'm not convinced this is strictly

3472:

instances can usually be smoothed to remove the inaccuracy without inserting the word 'other'. Does that make sense in the context of your take on the matter? If a guideline discussion is held on this issue would you please alert me, and thanks again.

3712: 1899:

Regarding Brannon and Terrace, they specifically say: "monkeys represent the numerosities 1-9 on at least an ordinal scale". Does this differ from "repeatedly adding (or subtracting) one, usually to find out how many objects there are " (from

2104:

That was as concise as i could make my question, and that didnt get me anything from google. So; does anyone know if studies have been done about this? If yes, what are they called (And should we put them here?) If no, feel free to ignore.

1630:

Additionally, I am unsure on whether or not to compare human spatial cognition to ape spatial cognition on this page. If it is a topic people would like to know more about please let me know. You can see that reference here:

3116:(I don't think it belongs, but, that is just me). It seems to be a commercial website )note the patreon link on the site). I am opening this section in hope that the new editor will discuss this here rather than edit war. Thanks! 3656:

I have just corrected a little bad mistake: "animals" instead of "mammals" in the third line of the section "Methods": "all sorts of (mammals)animals large and small (birds, fish, ants, bees, and others) have been brought into the

1293:

Oh sorry, I did not make that very clear now did I. Those of us that do research in animal cogntiion. I do research in the area, keep current with all of the journals etc and have never seen the issue brought up, not once.

1370:

The society agreement which is a typical ground for human moral says that we agree to protect good living conditions and fair treatment for all those who are like us, so for also the animals if they qualify by this standard.

3488:

Randy, one approach I have taken here is that when I start a new article and it is appropriate, I place into the first couple of sentences a covering sentence saying the article is about non-human animals. For example, see

1238:

Funny, I study animal cognition and we NEVER bring up this stuff about 'well if they are intelligent we cannot eat them'. I'll wait to see if anyone has a reason to leave the statement in, if not I will trash it.

1994:

to oppose behavioural and cognitive analyses: insofar as the study of animal cognition exposes new behavioural phenomena, it simply provides more that a radical behaviourist must explain without using mentalistic

2859:

The results described here suggest that the jays can spontaneously plan for tomorrow without reference to their current motivational state, thereby challenging the idea that this is a uniquely human ability.

3266:

Yes, I agree with you. It is a shame because it has some interesting information. Perhaps the site can be used as a springboard for editors researching the subject to find suitable RS, hopefully secondary.

2084:

It is there, I imagine, because of the notion that people might athropomorphise is a serious issue (see Shettleworth, 1993 for an explanation of the anthropoecentric programme of animal cognition research)

2061:

I don't see a reason why there's a link to Anthropomorphism in the 'see also' section, and i think it takes away some objectivity to the article. May someone tell me or otherwise remove the link please?

2716:

Dbrodbeck wrote "Animal Intelligence is not seen as often". It's not true, I googled both terms, animal intellegence return 6 times more results. The article should be renamed to animal intellegence.

2647:

The area of study, for example, is referred to as animal cognition, indeed there is even a peer review journal with that name. Animal Intelligence is not seen as often. It is hardly 'speciesism'.

864:

To get over the 'original research' label on the 'Relative Intelligence' section a citation to Shettleworth's Cognition, Evolution and Behaviour' on the bit about different niches might be helpful.

827:

is still of distinctive significance now. If you want to put this back, please discuss it here first and explain why it matters - it may be a perfectly valid point that just needs some rephrasing.

1265:

Yes, seriously. I am not a liar, that was uncalled for. This is a science we are here to talk about, it is not a forum for personal attacks. Let's try to improve this page rather than play games.

616: 3809: 1664:

That is definitely a potential problem, especially because I can already see your interpretation in the description of what you are going to put in the article. Did you find any review articles?

606: 1063:

And how shall was define it for other species? This question really is not that important any more in the world of animal cognition research, seriously, take a look at Shettleworth (1998)

1483:

other domesticated species, like horses, cows and pigs are considered intelligent. Some other, like oxen are famed for their herd animal stupidity (brains under 1 kg, several hundred grams)

1419:

I want to ask how are penguins intelligent? They are non-flying birds and can have large brain, but I can't find any information about their brain and intellectual abilities. Til. 29.03.07

1627:

Basically, I will compare the spatial cognition of cats, dogs and apes using the above references. In these studies, spatial cognition is studied with regard to food, objects and disease.

1650:. Those are all fine references (hell, I know half of those people....) However, we cannot do synthesis of primary sources here, we have to or should at least, use secondary sources. 3814: 1536:

Remember this is not a forum, this page is for discussing the article. I will say that there are many simpler explanations other than that dog actually reading... Look up Clever Hans.

870:

Who are these 'many' that don't like the scientific approach? What journals do they publish in? If someone can find a citation fine, but if not, I would like to remove that section.

582: 736:

in 2013 Q1. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Shenandoah University/History and Systems of Psychology (Spring 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

2601:

These two sub-sections appear to cover similar material but both contain important information. I believe these sub-sections should be merged under the heading "Animal insight".__

1325:

the converse is true, however; animal cognition is almost ALWAYS brought up in arguments about vegetarianism, possibly because morality is as irrelevant to a study of intelligance.

1159:. Any rate, this is yet another article which has improved since I last saw it, though still in need of much work. A good sign that the idiots who write what they "know" may, 3804: 569: 546: 417: 2380:

For goodness sake Arthur, you are really exasperating at times. Read the rest of this source. Although it is written by a freelance journalist, it is nonetheless clearly a

2223:. Alex, a parrot trained by Pepperberg to use a vocabulary of roughly 100 words, immediately knew familiar words spoken in regional dialects and in thick foreign accents. 795:

Hey guys, do you think it would be beneficial to the page if in the "cognitive revolution" section we or I add something about piaget's theory of cognitive development? --

3538: 2990:

Brauer, Juliane; Kaminski, Juliane; Riedel, Julia; Call, Josep; Tomasello, Michael (2006). "Making Inferences About the Location of Hidden Food: Social Dog, Causal Ape".

3584: 3580: 3566: 3358: 3354: 3340: 705: 377: 1624:

object permanence. Because cats are less studied than dogs and apes, I will describe how FIV can affect their spatial cognition abilities using the third reference.

326: 3824: 2564: 695: 434: 442: 140: 1205:

Now the section has returned. Let me point out why this section ought to go. This is a science right? Beliefs are not important. It is, well, that simple.

1885:. However, if the sources are being mis-used or misquoted by all means do fix them, but deletion is not appropriate; I have therefore reverted the deletion. 3779: 130: 1388:

Two points, BF Skinner taught pigeons to 'read' ages ago. 2) this is not really a forum for discussing animal cog it is a place to talk about the article.

3829: 2907:

I doubt there have been a sufficient number of studies to allow a meta-analysis but there might be a review somewhere. There is a good study showing that

2358:

As for the content, I don't see anything, at least on the first page, which is related to the subject of this article, even if it does mention animals. —

2451:

I think perhaps some mention should be made of animal reason as discussed here, animals and reason as discussed from a Catholic philosophical standpoint.

1778:

also, "Most researchers in the field of Comparative Cognition have abandoned the notion" that some species are more intelligent than others? Wth is this,

671: 254: 2869:

There is now growing evidence that some animal species are able to plan for the future. For example great apes save and exchange tools for future use. (

1422: 501: 475: 317: 3243:

lists 19 reasons for not placing an external link. It would be helpful if you explained which of those is your major reason/s for reverting the link.

2522:

It should be numerosity, or numeracy or some such thing. As well, it uses primary sources, not secondary ones. We should use secondary ones to avoid

2756:

The above is defamation. I don't know who is CYl7EPTEMA777. Epipelagic is a habitual liar, his lies has been documented in many places. For example

957:

why can't people fly when they flap their arms. Does that make any sense? I am pretty close to this stuff, and I probably am not always clear....

3794: 3784: 244: 763:

grammatical errors. I love animals and it shows that you had an interest in this subject area as well. Overall you did a great job! ~~IZRozin22~~

343: 106: 3819: 3720: 3424:

consensus. I suggest you remove these inclusions before someone else does - which is almost certain to happen. Happy to talk more about this.

1185:

This relative intelligence seciton is getting silly. Who cares what people think is the smartes species, or what the 'widespread belief' is?

662: 639: 438: 3799: 2717: 1426: 3454: 3774: 3637:

I edited a citation in your article as the sentence about cephalopods and their intelligence was missing a reference. It is reference 130.

2431: 2227: 2069: 1522: 2250:

The Limits of Intelligence: The laws of physics may well prevent the human brain from evolving into an ever more powerful thinking machine

1706:

provides an interesting article with a lot of information and new evidence that has not been covered in this article yet. There's also a

2893:

How about a compendium of research sets that look at this? Is there some kind of 'systematic review' or 'meta-analysis' of this topic?

2803: 2767: 2677: 2559: 2329: 2257: 2122: 2106: 1943: 1866: 3539:

https://web.archive.org/web/20081119150148/http://biology.plosjournals.org/archive/1545-7885/6/8/pdf/10.1371_journal.pbio.0060202-L.pdf

3041: 1306:

Dbrodbeck, you might want to do a little more reading in your field. Donald Griffin discusses this a bit in Chapter 13 of <ital: -->

97: 58: 2455: 2299: 2181:

now housed at a research facility, uses a portable keyboard to press symbols that stand for spoken words. New evidence indicates that

1450: 1053: 940: 1281:

Who is "we"? Irregardless, the argument has litte to do with animal cognition and more to do with the motivations for vegetarianism.

3562:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

2193:

in Atlanta and her colleagues. Panzee thus challenges the argument that only people can recognize highly distorted words, thanks to

2943:"Relation of neurological findings on decoupling of brain activity from limb movement to Piagetian ideas on the origin of thought" 3789: 1609:

Hello. Below is a proposed list of references and a brief outline of what I would like to add to the spatial cognition section.

733: 220: 207: 163: 3542: 1220: 779: 3497:. Whilst I am sure this is far from a perfect compromise for people like you and me, it alerts some readers to this concern. 2610: 33: 2554: 2201:. ... Panzee’s immediate recognition of distorted words “is quite impressive and novel,” remarks psychologist Lori Holt of 1251:

Seriously? You and your colleagues "NEVER" bring that up? I find that to be unbelievable. Literally. You are lying, sir.

352: 925:

it's objectivity? Surely some of those people disagreeing about what intelligence is think it is a measurable quantity.

3627: 3401: 1710:

where some original sources can be researched. Someone more knowledgeable and with good English might give this a look.

3306: 2166: 1163:, be starting to loose on Knowledge (XXG). Keep this pattern up and I may come back and start editing again. ~Luke -- 3072: 2734:

This incoherent trolling from CYl7EPTEMA777 and her IP hopping socks is par for the course and should be ignored. --

1982:

between human and machine cognition. There is also a minority of cognitive scientists who simply neglect accumulated

1108:

better somehow is not useful. If you don't need it, it does not matter. That sort of thing. Does that help at all?

3556: 2415: 2202: 1966:

The results and philosophy of research into animal cognition continue to be controversial on a number of grounds:

1703: 2945:. College of Education (M/C 147), University of Illinois at Chicago, 1040 W. Harrison St., Chicago, IL 60607, USA. 3756: 3732: 3494: 3490: 3583:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

3357:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2721: 2435: 2231: 2190: 1430: 2249: 2073: 1526: 410: 336: 39: 2807: 2771: 2333: 2197:

tuned to speech sounds and steeped in chatter, the scientists contend in a paper published online June 30 in

2126: 2110: 1947: 1870: 3642: 3618: 3530: 3392: 3298: 3221:

I have twice in the past few days reverted the addition of a link to animalcognition.org. It seems to fail

2838: 2824: 2792: 2707: 2673: 2637: 2261: 1978: 1454: 1444:

Could you explain why penguins have so small brain? They are unflying predators and could have large brain.

2688:

I have no idea what that means, none at all. It was hard enough parsing your first post in this section.

2665: 2427: 2065: 1939: 1862: 1208: 1041: 928: 767: 506: 480: 3684: 2898: 2459: 2362: 2350: 2320: 2303: 2279: 1738: 1636: 1469: 1098: 1049: 985: 936: 895: 851: 2787:

if this article not synonym animal intelligence thereat must create other article animal intelligence --

1164: 3602:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

3590: 3457:. Perhaps the Animal Project should have a guideline that can reduce future time spent on this issue. -- 3376:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

3364: 2182: 2159: 1309: 1256: 670:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

581:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

267: 105:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

3529:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 3448:

Sorry Randy, but you are labouring the obvious. It is a long established default simplification in the

3297:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1707: 1326: 1859:

It can be restored and edited with a revert, but up till now it was simply providing misinformation.

1584: 1252: 1155:

Damn looking at this now I want to do some experiments on animal cognition myself. Might make a good

3752: 3728: 3716: 3462: 3331: 3011:"Search behavior in cats and dogs: Interspecific differences in working memory and spatial cognition" 2942: 2739: 2390: 1805:

THat is not what is being said, or it is not what is meant. Please see the Shettleworth reference.

21: 3257: 3230: 3176: 3136: 3121: 2916: 2781: 2693: 2652: 2617: 2606: 2584: 2531: 2512: 2474: 2411: 2253: 2220: 2215: 2145: 2089: 2047: 1923: 1838: 1810: 1795: 1769: 1711: 1684: 1655: 1599: 1541: 1270: 1216: 1113: 1083: 1068: 1012: 962: 911: 775: 178: 157: 2020: 1962:

The following section did not cite any sources and 3 months have elapsed since it was challenged.

1557: 3748: 3703:

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between

3638: 3550: 2834: 2820: 2788: 2703: 2669: 2633: 1715: 1669: 1580: 1488: 1441:

penguins have extremely small brains, less than few grams. They are some of the stupidest birds.

822:(1916) that monkeys and apes are capable of transfer their learning to new tasks (Sebeok, 1990)." 800: 753: 400: 365: 3587:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

3361:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

3190:

Are we correct to use the heading "consciousness" or would it be better to use "self-awareness"?

2185:, much like people, quickly recognizes distorted words that contain few of the acoustic cues in 2000:

To me it looks like a personal opinion, but if we can find reliable sources that would be good.

850:

The article seems to have a bit of venom towards behavorists. Also, it only lists two sources.

3603: 3377: 3200:

That depends if you want to emphasize that humans are different from or similar to animals. --

3751:

for animals? Having different bodies seems like an important part of a species' intelligence.

3680: 3662: 3009:

DORE, FRANYOIS; FISET, SYLVAIN; GOULET, SONIA; DUMAS, MARIE-CHANTALE; GAGNON, SYLVAIN (1996).

2894: 2833:

nobody will split therefore I myself split it (but initially i split article talking bird) --

2359: 2347: 2317: 2276: 2242: 2039: 2024: 1974: 1734: 1632: 1561: 1156: 1094: 1045: 981: 932: 891: 89: 3240: 3222: 3113: 2167:

Chimp has an ear for talk; Language-trained ape recognizes distorted speech surprisingly well

3543:

http://biology.plosjournals.org/archive/1545-7885/6/8/pdf/10.1371_journal.pbio.0060202-L.pdf

3522: 3290: 3206: 3154: 2972: 3610: 3384: 3109: 2523: 1647: 1556:

This article needs the references in the text made into links to the References section. -

3483: 3473: 3458: 3436: 3418: 2881: 2735: 2491: 2386: 2198: 2005: 1909: 1890: 188: 3040:

Steigerwald, Elizabeth; Sarter, Martin; March, Philip; Podell, Michael (April 15, 1999).

2343: 2316:

be in this article which it could support, it doesn't belong. I don't think you can. —

2140:

behaviour is hardly observed now as milkbottles are rarely left on doorsteps these days!

1882: 1787: 1761: 3010: 3569:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 3343:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 3253: 3226: 3172: 3132: 3117: 3042:"Effects of Feline Immunodeficiency Virus on Cognition and Behavioral Function in Cats" 2912: 2689: 2648: 2602: 2580: 2527: 2508: 2470: 2407: 2186: 2141: 2085: 2043: 1991: 1919: 1834: 1806: 1791: 1765: 1730: 1680: 1651: 1595: 1537: 1501: 1405: 1389: 1362: 1353: 1344: 1335: 1295: 1266: 1240: 1212: 1186: 1176: 1109: 1079: 1064: 1008: 958: 907: 881: 871: 865: 771: 392: 360: 348: 194: 3609:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

3576: 3383:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

3350: 2911:

jumping spider use planning when they are hunting. I'll insert it into the article.__

1819:

well, if it wasn't meant, it's good thing I removed the statement, isn't it. I left a

3768: 1779: 1665: 1361:

Thanks, had not had the time, been marking papers for an animal cognition class.....

1334:

It smells like pov, and has no citations. Anyway it is probably in the wrong place.

1282: 836: 796: 749: 667: 578: 426: 422: 3658: 3449: 3307:

https://web.archive.org/web/20080509193310/http://www.animalcognition.net/home.html

2957: 2170: 1823: 561: 540: 1764:, discussing the intelligence of the various orders or species under examination. 1468:

I don't see any mention on cognition in reptiles. Could someone cover this topic?

3699: 3557:

http://www.current-biology.com/content/article/abstract?uid=PIIS0960982207009311

3201: 3150: 1313: 1197: 828: 370: 73: 52: 2861: 1918:

I would call it counting, same thing with say Olthoff, Iden and ROberts, 1997.

494: 469: 3575:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 3349:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2877: 2870: 2629: 2487: 2001: 1983: 1905: 1886: 184: 102: 79: 3171:

Please be advised there is a discussion here which may affect this article.__

2452: 1881:

The section included references to peer-reviewed publications which count as

1760:

ranges from "clearly none" to "definitely". This article should rather be in

2421: 2295: 1733:

be added to the article? I think they are creatures of worthy intelligence.

726: 3310: 3108:

An editor has added to the external links which I have reverted twice per

654: 633: 3760: 3736: 3688: 3666: 3646: 3632: 3501: 3476: 3466: 3439: 3428: 3406: 3271: 3261: 3247: 3234: 3210: 3194: 3180: 3158: 3140: 3125: 2920: 2885: 2842: 2828: 2811: 2796: 2775: 2743: 2725: 2711: 2697: 2681: 2661:

cognitive ethology not mean that animal intelligence is animal cognition

2656: 2641: 2588: 2570: 2535: 2516: 2495: 2478: 2463: 2439: 2394: 2365: 2353: 2337: 2323: 2307: 2282: 2265: 2235: 2149: 2130: 2114: 2100:

Effects of Humanity on Potential Stunting of Animal Cognition Development?

2093: 2077: 2051: 2028: 2009: 1951: 1927: 1913: 1894: 1874: 1842: 1814: 1799: 1773: 1742: 1719: 1688: 1673: 1659: 1640: 1603: 1588: 1565: 1545: 1530: 1504: 1491: 1472: 1458: 1434: 1408: 1392: 1365: 1356: 1347: 1338: 1329: 1316: 1298: 1285: 1274: 1260: 1243: 1224: 1200: 1189: 1179: 1167: 1152:

like cockatiels (cutest parrots there are, but also the dumbest, I swear).

1117: 1102: 1087: 1072: 1057: 1016: 989: 966: 944: 915: 899: 884: 874: 854: 839: 804: 783: 757: 3679:

I’m not sure this should be in the article, if it’s generally dismissed.

3046:

Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes & Human Retrovirology

2625: 2298:, ... just on the first page. Simple dismissal seems unwarranted, Art. 2287: 1901: 1757: 835:

What's wrong with covering the history of the study of animal cognition?

574: 356: 3131:

OK, maybe I reverted it once and got beaten to it the second time.....

2469:

This is a science article, why would what any religion thinks matter?

2291: 2210: 1977:

have been interested in comparing and contrasting human cognition with

216: 305: 2976: 1343:

Well if there are no objections over the next while I will remove it

212: 2851:

Some animals have demonstrated abilities for foresight and planning

1352:

Im removing it, it is at worst OR, and at best doesn't belong here

211:, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to 2206: 2194: 2178: 1752:

It is completely futile to discuss the intelligence of "animals",

1175:

including Kamil (1987) and of course Shettleworth (1998, I think).

2596: 2038:

There is a new issue of BP out this month, March 2009, honouring

1829:

at the "laypeople" passage, so please feel free to clarify what

1312:

20:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC) (whoops, sorry for the missing sig.

2205:

in Pittsburgh. In experiments conducted over the past 30 years,

1936:

emergence thats all (see wikipedia article of the same name).

2855:

I think the article would benefit from a section on planning.

721: 15: 3747:

Do you guys think it would be beneficial to add a section on

1404:

appropriate place for discussing how to design experiments.

3316:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

2597:

Merging 'Animal insight' and 'Reasoning and problem solving'

3533:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

3301:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1447:

Brain size does not correlate to actual intellect, foo'.

1308:, in the section "Ethical Significance." So does deWaal. 814:

For the time being, I've removed the following passage:

3526: 3294: 2816: 2757: 293: 288: 283: 278: 2958:"Do Animals Have Insight, and What Is Insight Anyway?" 2400: 591:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism

2628:, this article of intelligence, this absurd and just 2169:

by Bruce Bower August 13th, 2011; Vol.180 #4 (p. 16)

2342:

99.56.123.120 = 97.87.29.188 = 99.190.85.111 ; read

2312:

Well, if you cannot come up with any statement that

1786:, and pending the citation of anything resembling a 666:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 573:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 3810:

High-importance Veganism and Vegetarianism articles

3579:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 3353:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1986:

knowledge about cognition, whether animal or human.

2401:Why does 'Animal Sentience' redirect to this page? 1552:References in text need links to reference section 1138:Some Studies might be nice | Also comment on owls 504:, a project which is currently considered to be 3815:WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism articles 2175: 1579:If you think we should scrap it, please do so. 594:Template:WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism 3565:This message was posted before February 2018. 3339:This message was posted before February 2018. 2275:article. The title suggests no relevance. — 2015:"this chimpanzee is using a stick to get food" 3694:Wiki Education assignment: PSY100H Psychology 1704:National Geographic Magazine April 2008 Issue 516:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Cognitive science 8: 2214:word-recognition chops. Irene Pepperberg of 3805:C-Class Veganism and Vegetarianism articles 3167:Discussion you might want to be involved in 2965:Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2702:Definitely rename in animal intelligence - 1594:Well done! I think it is a good addition. 3521:I have just modified one external link on 3289:I have just modified one external link on 2453:http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12673b.htm 628: 535: 464: 262: 152: 47: 2447:Animals and Reason in Catholic Philosophy 1790:, I suppose the claim should be removed. 680:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Animal rights 3311:http://www.animalcognition.net/home.html 2328:To whom or what are you talking, Art? 1500:(See Shettleworth, 1998 or Kamil, 1987) 1487:Cows are intelligent, but oxen are not? 339:into articles about endangered species. 2933: 630: 537: 466: 413:into articles about endangered species. 154: 49: 19: 3825:High-importance Animal rights articles 3073:"Spatial cognition in apes and humans" 2034:Special Issue of Beahvioural Processes 1958:Removed Continuing controversy section 570:WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism 519:Template:WikiProject Cognitive science 115:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Psychology 3328:to let others know (documentation at 7: 2862:Nature. 2007 Feb 22;445(7130):919-21 880:somewhere where this is mentioned. 660:This article is within the scope of 567:This article is within the scope of 500:This article is within the scope of 95:This article is within the scope of 3780:High-importance psychology articles 820:The Mental Life of Monkeys and Apes 732:This article was the subject of an 597:Veganism and Vegetarianism articles 229:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Animals 38:It is of interest to the following 3830:WikiProject Animal rights articles 3708: 3704: 2542:Animal personality or lack thereof 683:Template:WikiProject Animal rights 435:Science collaboration of the month 219:. For more information, visit the 14: 3525:. Please take a moment to review 3293:. Please take a moment to review 2992:Journal of Comparative Psychology 443:WikiProject Animals Collaboration 3711:. Further details are available 3698: 2162:research in current Science News 725: 653: 632: 560: 539: 493: 468: 304: 187: 177: 156: 82: 72: 51: 20: 3795:High-importance animal articles 3785:WikiProject Psychology articles 3186:consciousness or self-awareness 700:This article has been rated as 611:This article has been rated as 249:This article has been rated as 135:This article has been rated as 118:Template:WikiProject Psychology 3820:C-Class Animal rights articles 3071:Gentner, D. (March 23, 2007). 2956:Shettleworth, Sara J. (2012). 2921:16:03, 24 September 2014 (UTC) 2886:22:35, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 2010:13:21, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 1928:12:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 1914:11:34, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 1895:11:34, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 1875:08:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 1851:Math & Numerical Cognition 1646:The potential problem here is 1: 3761:23:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC) 3737:15:50, 17 November 2023 (UTC) 3727:— Assignment last updated by 3689:19:15, 22 December 2022 (UTC) 3195:15:50, 27 December 2015 (UTC) 2843:17:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC) 2829:11:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC) 2812:06:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC) 2797:20:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC) 2776:01:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC) 2744:08:00, 15 February 2014 (UTC) 2726:06:41, 15 February 2014 (UTC) 2712:07:54, 14 February 2014 (UTC) 2698:12:29, 13 February 2014 (UTC) 2682:10:25, 13 February 2014 (UTC) 2657:12:42, 12 February 2014 (UTC) 2642:09:35, 12 February 2014 (UTC) 2536:19:37, 15 December 2012 (UTC) 2517:18:51, 15 December 2012 (UTC) 2440:01:01, 19 December 2011 (UTC) 2416:15:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC) 2395:09:48, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 2366:08:12, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 2354:08:10, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 2338:08:02, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 2324:01:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 2308:01:32, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 2150:14:57, 18 December 2011 (UTC) 2029:06:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 1566:01:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 1546:21:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC) 1531:13:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC) 1366:12:14, 14 December 2006 (UTC) 1357:00:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC) 1348:12:14, 14 December 2006 (UTC) 1339:04:16, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 1330:23:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC) 1017:14:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 990:07:11, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 967:00:20, 25 February 2008 (UTC) 945:15:33, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 916:21:07, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 906:important book in the field. 900:15:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 875:19:39, 22 December 2006 (UTC) 855:14:14, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 758:17:28, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 674:and see a list of open tasks. 585:and see a list of open tasks. 502:WikiProject Cognitive science 353:Tool use by non-human animals 109:and see a list of open tasks. 3800:WikiProject Animals articles 3407:08:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC) 3211:03:24, 23 January 2016 (UTC) 3080:Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3015:Animal Learning and Behavior 2890:Planning and forethought... 2589:17:53, 8 February 2013 (UTC) 2571:21:52, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 2283:14:50, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 2266:09:13, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 1689:23:51, 31 October 2012 (UTC) 1674:20:54, 31 October 2012 (UTC) 1660:10:43, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 1641:04:23, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 1317:20:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 1225:12:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC) 805:21:29, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 232:Template:WikiProject Animals 3775:C-Class psychology articles 3647:02:05, 3 October 2017 (UTC) 2871:Am J Primatol. 2014 Sep 18. 2236:02:02, 18 August 2011 (UTC) 1516:Is this possible in theory? 1505:20:28, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 1492:20:21, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 1299:20:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 1286:18:21, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 1244:12:55, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 1201:22:04, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 840:18:22, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 3846: 3596:(last update: 5 June 2024) 3518:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 3370:(last update: 5 June 2024) 3286:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 3181:21:59, 12 April 2015 (UTC) 3159:14:27, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 3141:12:03, 15 March 2015 (UTC) 3126:12:01, 15 March 2015 (UTC) 2496:18:53, 24 April 2012 (UTC) 2203:Carnegie Mellon University 2052:02:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 1307:Animal Minds</ital: --> 1190:00:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 1180:21:40, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 1168:21:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 885:11:26, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 784:17:43, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 706:project's importance scale 617:project's importance scale 588:Veganism and Vegetarianism 547:Veganism and Vegetarianism 522:Cognitive science articles 255:project's importance scale 141:project's importance scale 3672:Mark McMenamin inclusion? 3495:Theory of mind in animals 3491:Self-anointing in animals 2611:22:38, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 2479:12:52, 7 April 2012 (UTC) 2464:02:08, 7 April 2012 (UTC) 2131:22:06, 31 July 2011 (UTC) 2121:would not fit into this. 2115:22:03, 31 July 2011 (UTC) 1833:intended by the passage. 1815:17:54, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 1800:17:35, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 1774:17:27, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 1720:00:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 1604:21:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 1589:15:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 1435:07:33, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 1409:11:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1393:11:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 1275:11:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 1261:02:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 1144:weasel words implying it. 818:"Robert Yerkes proved in 699: 663:WikiProject Animal rights 648: 610: 555: 488: 439:Article Improvement Drive 411:GLAM/ARKive donated texts 337:GLAM/ARKive donated texts 261: 248: 172: 134: 67: 46: 3667:15:10, 24 May 2020 (UTC) 3633:06:41, 6 July 2017 (UTC) 3502:22:02, 12 May 2017 (UTC) 3477:11:58, 12 May 2017 (UTC) 3467:09:14, 12 May 2017 (UTC) 3440:23:44, 11 May 2017 (UTC) 3429:18:49, 11 May 2017 (UTC) 3272:15:42, 19 May 2016 (UTC) 3262:15:21, 19 May 2016 (UTC) 3248:15:10, 19 May 2016 (UTC) 3235:14:00, 19 May 2016 (UTC) 2271:How is that relevant to 2191:Georgia State University 1952:19:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 1843:11:41, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 1743:05:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC) 1473:00:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 1459:03:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 831:01:33, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC) 3790:C-Class animal articles 3514:External links modified 3282:External links modified 2502:mathematics or numeracy 2094:11:25, 4 May 2011 (UTC) 2078:03:12, 4 May 2011 (UTC) 1979:artificial intelligence 1118:00:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC) 1103:22:26, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 1088:02:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 1073:23:41, 4 May 2008 (UTC) 1058:21:49, 4 May 2008 (UTC) 743:Knowledge (XXG) Project 205:is within the scope of 2875: 2866: 2225: 1998: 1756:. Intelligence in the 734:educational assignment 686:Animal rights articles 98:WikiProject Psychology 28:This article is rated 3715:. Student editor(s): 2867: 2857: 2019:That's not a chimp! 1964: 1425:comment was added by 860:Relative intelligence 791:Cognitive development 369:(a species in family 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 3577:regular verification 3351:regular verification 3146:anecdotal accounts. 2941:Becker, Joe (2005). 2221:African gray parrots 1975:Cognitive scientists 266:WikiProject Animals 3567:After February 2018 3341:After February 2018 3320:parameter below to 3217:Animalcognition.org 2782:Animal intelligence 2618:animal intelligence 2254:Scientific American 2216:Brandeis University 208:WikiProject Animals 121:psychology articles 3749:embodied cognition 3743:Embodied cognition 3713:on the course page 3621:InternetArchiveBot 3572:InternetArchiveBot 3395:InternetArchiveBot 3346:InternetArchiveBot 2252:by Douglas Fox in 432:Nominate and vote: 401:Zaniolepis frenata 366:Sphaerium beckmani 34:content assessment 3597: 3371: 3209: 2685: 2668:comment added by 2430:comment added by 2243:Talk:Intelligence 2068:comment added by 2040:Sara Shettleworth 1942:comment added by 1865:comment added by 1841: 1798: 1772: 1571:Spatial Cognition 1438: 1227: 1211:comment added by 1060: 1044:comment added by 947: 931:comment added by 852:PragmaticallyWyrd 846:Anti-behavoralist 787: 770:comment added by 740: 739: 720: 719: 716: 715: 712: 711: 627: 626: 623: 622: 534: 533: 530: 529: 513:Cognitive science 476:Cognitive science 463: 462: 459: 458: 455: 454: 451: 450: 151: 150: 147: 146: 90:Psychology portal 3837: 3739: 3721:article contribs 3710: 3709:11 December 2023 3706: 3702: 3631: 3622: 3595: 3594: 3573: 3554: 3523:Animal cognition 3500: 3487: 3427: 3422: 3405: 3396: 3369: 3368: 3347: 3335: 3291:Animal cognition 3270: 3246: 3205: 3193: 3157: 3096: 3095: 3093: 3091: 3077: 3068: 3062: 3061: 3059: 3057: 3037: 3031: 3030: 3028: 3026: 3006: 3000: 2999: 2987: 2981: 2980: 2977:10.1037/a0030674 2962: 2953: 2947: 2946: 2938: 2684: 2662: 2569: 2567: 2562: 2557: 2552: 2551: 2442: 2256:June 14, 2011. 2080: 1954: 1883:reliable sources 1877: 1837: 1828: 1822: 1794: 1768: 1679:I wrote them). 1420: 1206: 1039: 926: 786: 764: 729: 722: 688: 687: 684: 681: 678: 657: 650: 649: 644: 636: 629: 599: 598: 595: 592: 589: 564: 557: 556: 551: 543: 536: 524: 523: 520: 517: 514: 497: 490: 489: 484: 472: 465: 308: 300: 299: 263: 237: 236: 233: 230: 227: 202:Animal cognition 197: 192: 191: 181: 174: 173: 168: 160: 153: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 85: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 3845: 3844: 3840: 3839: 3838: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3765: 3764: 3753:BioLabEmergency 3745: 3729:SabrinaPorretto 3726: 3717:SabrinaPorretto 3696: 3674: 3654: 3625: 3620: 3588: 3581:have permission 3571: 3548: 3531:this simple FaQ 3516: 3498: 3481: 3425: 3416: 3414: 3399: 3394: 3362: 3355:have permission 3345: 3329: 3299:this simple FaQ 3284: 3268: 3244: 3219: 3191: 3188: 3169: 3155:leave a message 3149: 3106: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3089: 3087: 3075: 3070: 3069: 3065: 3055: 3053: 3039: 3038: 3034: 3024: 3022: 3008: 3007: 3003: 2989: 2988: 2984: 2960: 2955: 2954: 2950: 2940: 2939: 2935: 2853: 2785: 2718:124.170.218.196 2663: 2622: 2599: 2565: 2560: 2555: 2553: 2549: 2548: 2544: 2504: 2449: 2425: 2403: 2346:guidelines. — 2246: 2199:Current Biology 2164: 2102: 2063: 2059: 2057:Antropomorphism 2036: 2017: 1960: 1937: 1860: 1853: 1826: 1820: 1750: 1727: 1701: 1699:New Information 1573: 1554: 1518: 1480: 1470:207.119.173.108 1466: 1442: 1427:213.227.194.147 1421:—The preceding 1417: 1377: 1236: 1140: 862: 848: 812: 793: 765: 745: 702:High-importance 685: 682: 679: 676: 675: 643:High‑importance 642: 613:High-importance 596: 593: 590: 587: 586: 550:High‑importance 549: 521: 518: 515: 512: 511: 478: 447: 298: 251:High-importance 235:animal articles 234: 231: 228: 225: 224: 193: 186: 167:High‑importance 166: 137:High-importance 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 83: 81: 62:High‑importance 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 3843: 3841: 3833: 3832: 3827: 3822: 3817: 3812: 3807: 3802: 3797: 3792: 3787: 3782: 3777: 3767: 3766: 3744: 3741: 3705:25 August 2023 3695: 3692: 3673: 3670: 3653: 3650: 3615: 3614: 3607: 3560: 3559: 3545: 3537:Added archive 3515: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3455:Animal project 3443: 3442: 3413: 3412:use of "other" 3410: 3389: 3388: 3381: 3314: 3313: 3305:Added archive 3283: 3280: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3218: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3187: 3184: 3168: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3143: 3105: 3104:External links 3102: 3098: 3097: 3063: 3032: 3001: 2982: 2971:(4): 217-226. 2948: 2932: 2931: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2852: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2831: 2784: 2779: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2714: 2626:other articles 2621: 2614: 2598: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2543: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2507:mathematics.__ 2503: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2482: 2481: 2448: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2432:99.181.137.218 2402: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2382:major overview 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2356: 2245: 2239: 2228:99.181.138.215 2187:natural speech 2163: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2134: 2133: 2101: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2070:189.139.91.225 2058: 2055: 2035: 2032: 2016: 2013: 1997: 1996: 1992:category error 1987: 1972: 1959: 1956: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1897: 1852: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1758:animal kingdom 1749: 1746: 1731:monitor lizard 1726: 1723: 1700: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1621: 1620: 1618: 1616: 1607: 1606: 1572: 1569: 1553: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1523:84.239.162.126 1517: 1514: 1512: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1489:marbeh raglaim 1479: 1476: 1465: 1462: 1440: 1416: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1396: 1395: 1376: 1375:Animal testing 1373: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1235: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1183: 1182: 1171: 1170: 1165:71.192.117.127 1157:Div II Project 1153: 1149: 1145: 1139: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1075: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 972: 971: 970: 969: 951: 950: 949: 948: 919: 918: 861: 858: 847: 844: 843: 842: 824: 823: 811: 808: 792: 789: 744: 741: 738: 737: 730: 718: 717: 714: 713: 710: 709: 698: 692: 691: 689: 672:the discussion 658: 646: 645: 637: 625: 624: 621: 620: 609: 603: 602: 600: 583:the discussion 565: 553: 552: 544: 532: 531: 528: 527: 525: 498: 486: 485: 473: 461: 460: 457: 456: 453: 452: 449: 448: 446: 445: 429: 414: 405: 404: 403: 395: 393:Campocraspedon 390:Invertebrates: 387: 374: 361:Animal suicide 349:Photoperiodism 340: 331: 314:Here are some 313: 311: 309: 297: 296: 291: 286: 281: 275: 272: 271: 259: 258: 247: 241: 240: 238: 199: 198: 195:Animals portal 182: 170: 169: 161: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3842: 3831: 3828: 3826: 3823: 3821: 3818: 3816: 3813: 3811: 3808: 3806: 3803: 3801: 3798: 3796: 3793: 3791: 3788: 3786: 3783: 3781: 3778: 3776: 3773: 3772: 3770: 3763: 3762: 3758: 3754: 3750: 3742: 3740: 3738: 3734: 3730: 3724: 3722: 3718: 3714: 3701: 3693: 3691: 3690: 3686: 3682: 3677: 3671: 3669: 3668: 3664: 3660: 3657:laboratory"-- 3651: 3649: 3648: 3644: 3640: 3639:Laurendpeters 3635: 3634: 3629: 3624: 3623: 3612: 3608: 3605: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3592: 3586: 3582: 3578: 3574: 3568: 3563: 3558: 3552: 3546: 3544: 3540: 3536: 3535: 3534: 3532: 3528: 3524: 3519: 3513: 3503: 3496: 3492: 3485: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3475: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3464: 3460: 3456: 3451: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3444: 3441: 3438: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3420: 3411: 3409: 3408: 3403: 3398: 3397: 3386: 3382: 3379: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3366: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3342: 3337: 3333: 3327: 3323: 3319: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3300: 3296: 3292: 3287: 3281: 3273: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3242: 3239: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3232: 3228: 3224: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3203: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3185: 3183: 3182: 3178: 3174: 3166: 3160: 3156: 3152: 3148: 3147: 3144: 3142: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3123: 3119: 3115: 3111: 3103: 3085: 3081: 3074: 3067: 3064: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3036: 3033: 3021:(24): 142–149 3020: 3016: 3012: 3005: 3002: 2998:(120): 38–47. 2997: 2993: 2986: 2983: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2959: 2952: 2949: 2944: 2937: 2934: 2930: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2900: 2896: 2891: 2888: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2874: 2872: 2865: 2863: 2856: 2850: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2835:CYl7EPTEMA777 2832: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2821:CYl7EPTEMA777 2818: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2809: 2805: 2804:124.170.240.4 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2789:CYl7EPTEMA777 2783: 2780: 2778: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2768:124.168.63.54 2759: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2713: 2709: 2705: 2704:CYl7EPTEMA777 2701: 2700: 2699: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2686: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2670:CYl7EPTEMA777 2667: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2634:CYl7EPTEMA777 2631: 2627: 2624:cognition in 2619: 2615: 2613: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2590: 2586: 2582: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2568: 2563: 2558: 2541: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2484: 2483: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2454: 2446: 2441: 2437: 2433: 2429: 2423: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2383: 2379: 2378: 2367: 2364: 2361: 2357: 2355: 2352: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2330:99.190.85.111 2327: 2326: 2325: 2322: 2319: 2315: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2281: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2258:99.56.123.120 2255: 2251: 2244: 2240: 2238: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2224: 2222: 2217: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2174: 2172: 2168: 2161: 2157: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2123:96.28.157.126 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2107:96.28.157.126 2099: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2056: 2054: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2033: 2031: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2014: 2012: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1993: 1988: 1985: 1984:psychological 1980: 1976: 1973: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1963: 1957: 1955: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1944:173.176.24.29 1941: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1898: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1867:12.240.35.188 1864: 1857: 1850: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1825: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1780:postmodernism 1776: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1747: 1745: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1724: 1722: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1708:links section 1705: 1698: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1628: 1625: 1619: 1617: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1610: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1577: 1570: 1568: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1515: 1513: 1506: 1503: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1490: 1485: 1484: 1478:Contradiction 1477: 1475: 1474: 1471: 1463: 1461: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1445: 1439: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1414: 1410: 1407: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1394: 1391: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1381: 1374: 1372: 1368: 1367: 1364: 1359: 1358: 1355: 1350: 1349: 1346: 1341: 1340: 1337: 1332: 1331: 1328: 1318: 1315: 1311: 1310:70.226.173.75 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1297: 1287: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1234:Vegetarianism 1233: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1199: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1188: 1181: 1178: 1173: 1172: 1169: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1141: 1137: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1076: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1061: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 991: 987: 983: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 973: 968: 964: 960: 955: 954: 953: 952: 946: 942: 938: 934: 930: 923: 922: 921: 920: 917: 913: 909: 904: 903: 902: 901: 897: 893: 887: 886: 883: 877: 876: 873: 868: 867: 859: 857: 856: 853: 845: 841: 838: 834: 833: 832: 830: 821: 817: 816: 815: 809: 807: 806: 802: 798: 790: 788: 785: 781: 777: 773: 769: 760: 759: 755: 751: 742: 735: 731: 728: 724: 723: 707: 703: 697: 694: 693: 690: 677:Animal rights 673: 669: 668:animal rights 665: 664: 659: 656: 652: 651: 647: 641: 640:Animal rights 638: 635: 631: 618: 614: 608: 605: 604: 601: 584: 580: 579:vegetarianism 576: 572: 571: 566: 563: 559: 558: 554: 548: 545: 542: 538: 526: 509: 508: 503: 499: 496: 492: 491: 487: 482: 477: 474: 471: 467: 444: 440: 436: 433: 430: 428: 427:Atka mackerel 424: 423:Junqueira cow 421: 419: 415: 412: 409: 406: 402: 399: 396: 394: 391: 388: 386: 383: 382: 381: 379: 375: 372: 368: 367: 362: 358: 354: 350: 347: 345: 341: 338: 335: 332: 330: 328: 324: 323: 321: 320: 319: 312: 310: 307: 302: 301: 295: 292: 290: 287: 285: 282: 280: 277: 276: 274: 273: 269: 265: 264: 260: 256: 252: 246: 243: 242: 239: 222: 218: 214: 210: 209: 204: 203: 196: 190: 185: 183: 180: 176: 175: 171: 165: 162: 159: 155: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 3746: 3725: 3697: 3681:UsersLikeYou 3678: 3675: 3655: 3636: 3619: 3616: 3591:source check 3570: 3564: 3561: 3520: 3517: 3450:common usage 3415: 3393: 3390: 3365:source check 3344: 3338: 3325: 3321: 3317: 3315: 3288: 3285: 3220: 3189: 3170: 3107: 3088:. Retrieved 3086:(5): 192–194 3083: 3079: 3066: 3054:. Retrieved 3052:(5): 411–419 3049: 3045: 3035: 3023:. Retrieved 3018: 3014: 3004: 2995: 2991: 2985: 2968: 2964: 2951: 2936: 2928: 2908: 2895:MaynardClark 2892: 2889: 2876: 2868: 2858: 2854: 2786: 2766: 2664:— Preceding 2623: 2600: 2556:Brambleberry 2545: 2505: 2456:24.191.87.42 2450: 2426:— Preceding 2404: 2381: 2360:Arthur Rubin 2348:Arthur Rubin 2318:Arthur Rubin 2313: 2300:97.87.29.188 2277:Arthur Rubin 2272: 2247: 2226: 2176: 2171:Science News 2165: 2103: 2060: 2037: 2018: 1999: 1965: 1961: 1938:— Preceding 1934: 1858: 1854: 1830: 1783: 1777: 1753: 1751: 1735:Elasmosaurus 1728: 1725:Should we... 1702: 1633:Soggycereal4 1629: 1626: 1622: 1612:References: 1611: 1608: 1578: 1574: 1555: 1519: 1511: 1486: 1482: 1481: 1467: 1451:71.53.85.163 1449: 1446: 1443: 1418: 1397: 1382: 1378: 1369: 1360: 1351: 1342: 1333: 1327:81.107.159.5 1324: 1292: 1237: 1184: 1160: 1095:0nullbinary0 1046:0nullbinary0 982:0nullbinary0 933:0nullbinary0 892:0nullbinary0 888: 878: 869: 863: 849: 825: 819: 813: 794: 766:— Preceding 761: 746: 701: 661: 612: 568: 505: 431: 416: 407: 397: 389: 384: 376: 364: 342: 333: 325: 316: 315: 303: 250: 221:project page 206: 201: 200: 136: 96: 40:WikiProjects 3332:Sourcecheck 3090:October 28, 3056:October 27, 3025:October 24, 2064:—Preceding 1861:—Preceding 1729:Should the 1253:Wigglestrue 1207:—Preceding 1040:—Preceding 927:—Preceding 371:Sphaeriidae 3769:Categories 3628:Report bug 3484:Randy Kryn 3474:Randy Kryn 3459:Epipelagic 3437:Randy Kryn 3419:Randy Kryn 3402:Report bug 3252:1,4,5,11. 2929:References 2736:Epipelagic 2630:speciecism 2387:Epipelagic 2177:Panzee, a 2173:. Excerpt 2158:Resource: 1784:ridiculous 1754:tout court 318:Open Tasks 112:Psychology 103:Psychology 59:Psychology 3611:this tool 3604:this tool 3551:dead link 3499:DrChrissy 3426:DrChrissy 3385:this tool 3378:this tool 3269:DrChrissy 3254:Dbrodbeck 3245:DrChrissy 3227:Dbrodbeck 3192:DrChrissy 3173:DrChrissy 3133:Dbrodbeck 3118:Dbrodbeck 2913:DrChrissy 2690:Dbrodbeck 2649:Dbrodbeck 2603:DrChrissy 2581:DrChrissy 2566:RiverClan 2528:Dbrodbeck 2509:DrChrissy 2471:Dbrodbeck 2422:Sentience 2408:DrChrissy 2296:elephants 2142:DrChrissy 2086:Dbrodbeck 2044:Dbrodbeck 1995:language. 1971:observed. 1920:Dbrodbeck 1807:Dbrodbeck 1748:structure 1681:Dbrodbeck 1652:Dbrodbeck 1596:Dbrodbeck 1538:Dbrodbeck 1502:Dbrodbeck 1464:Reptiles? 1406:Dbrodbeck 1390:Dbrodbeck 1363:Dbrodbeck 1354:Diletante 1345:Dbrodbeck 1336:Diletante 1296:Dbrodbeck 1267:Dbrodbeck 1241:Dbrodbeck 1213:Dbrodbeck 1187:Dbrodbeck 1177:Dbrodbeck 1110:Dbrodbeck 1080:Dbrodbeck 1065:Dbrodbeck 1009:Dbrodbeck 959:Dbrodbeck 908:Dbrodbeck 882:Dbrodbeck 872:Dbrodbeck 866:dbrodbeck 772:IZRozin22 3617:Cheers.— 3391:Cheers.— 3112:and per 2817:thanks** 2678:contribs 2666:unsigned 2616:Why not 2428:unsigned 2288:honeybee 2066:unsigned 1940:unsigned 1902:Counting 1863:unsigned 1712:Jjalocha 1666:Wadewitz 1423:unsigned 1415:Penguins 1283:Hyacinth 1221:contribs 1209:unsigned 1054:contribs 1042:unsigned 941:contribs 929:unsigned 837:Hyacinth 810:Learning 797:GLKeepr1 780:contribs 768:unsigned 750:GLKeepr1 575:veganism 507:inactive 481:inactive 385:Mammals: 378:Requests 357:Omnivore 327:Copyedit 3659:Calypso 3652:Methods 3555:tag to 3527:my edit 3318:checked 3295:my edit 3241:WP:ELNO 3223:WP:ELNO 3207:SNAFU ? 3114:WP:ELNO 2292:mammals 2211:rodents 2021:Sukiari 1558:Dougher 1161:finally 704:on the 615:on the 398:Fishes: 344:Improve 284:history 253:on the 226:Animals 217:zoology 213:animals 164:Animals 139:on the 30:C-class 3547:Added 3326:failed 3202:Amtiss 3151:Bfpage 3110:WP:BRD 2909:portia 2802:agree. 2524:WP:SYN 2363:(talk) 2351:(talk) 2321:(talk) 2314:should 2280:(talk) 2195:brains 2183:Panzee 2160:Panzee 1648:WP:SYN 1581:Ieshan 1314:Rbogle 1198:seglea 829:seglea 418:Expand 408:Merge: 334:Merge: 36:scale. 3076:(PDF) 2961:(PDF) 2878:pgr94 2488:Db4wp 2344:WP:EL 2207:birds 2179:chimp 2002:pgr94 1906:pgr94 1887:pgr94 1788:WP:RS 1762:WP:SS 294:purge 289:watch 268:To-do 3757:talk 3733:talk 3707:and 3685:talk 3663:talk 3643:talk 3493:and 3463:talk 3322:true 3258:talk 3231:talk 3177:talk 3137:talk 3122:talk 3092:2012 3058:2012 3027:2012 2917:talk 2899:talk 2882:talk 2839:talk 2825:talk 2808:talk 2793:talk 2772:talk 2758:here 2740:talk 2722:talk 2708:talk 2694:talk 2674:talk 2653:talk 2638:talk 2607:talk 2585:talk 2532:talk 2513:talk 2492:talk 2475:talk 2460:talk 2436:talk 2412:talk 2391:talk 2334:talk 2304:talk 2273:this 2262:talk 2248:Add 2241:Per 2232:talk 2146:talk 2127:talk 2111:talk 2090:talk 2074:talk 2048:talk 2025:talk 2006:talk 1948:talk 1924:talk 1910:talk 1891:talk 1871:talk 1839:(𒁳) 1811:talk 1796:(𒁳) 1770:(𒁳) 1739:talk 1716:talk 1685:talk 1670:talk 1656:talk 1637:talk 1600:talk 1585:talk 1562:talk 1542:talk 1527:talk 1455:talk 1431:talk 1271:talk 1257:talk 1217:talk 1114:talk 1099:talk 1084:talk 1069:talk 1050:talk 1013:talk 986:talk 963:talk 937:talk 912:talk 896:talk 801:talk 776:talk 754:talk 696:High 607:High 577:and 279:edit 245:High 215:and 131:High 3723:). 3585:RfC 3541:to 3359:RfC 3336:). 3324:or 3309:to 3225:. 2973:doi 2819:-- 2632:-- 2424:? 1904:)? 1835:dab 1824:huh 1792:dab 1766:dab 373:), 3771:: 3759:) 3735:) 3687:) 3665:) 3645:) 3598:. 3593:}} 3589:{{ 3553:}} 3549:{{ 3465:) 3372:. 3367:}} 3363:{{ 3334:}} 3330:{{ 3260:) 3233:) 3204:, 3179:) 3139:) 3124:) 3084:11 3082:. 3078:. 3050:20 3048:. 3044:. 3017:. 3013:. 2994:. 2969:66 2967:. 2963:. 2919:) 2901:) 2884:) 2841:) 2827:) 2810:) 2795:) 2774:) 2742:) 2724:) 2710:) 2696:) 2680:) 2676:• 2655:) 2640:) 2609:) 2587:) 2561:of 2534:) 2526:. 2515:) 2494:) 2477:) 2462:) 2438:) 2414:) 2393:) 2336:) 2306:) 2294:, 2290:, 2264:) 2234:) 2209:, 2148:) 2129:) 2113:) 2092:) 2076:) 2050:) 2027:) 2008:) 1950:) 1926:) 1912:) 1893:) 1873:) 1831:is 1827:}} 1821:{{ 1813:) 1741:) 1718:) 1687:) 1672:) 1658:) 1639:) 1602:) 1587:) 1564:) 1544:) 1529:) 1457:) 1433:) 1273:) 1259:) 1223:) 1219:• 1116:) 1101:) 1086:) 1071:) 1056:) 1052:• 1015:) 988:) 965:) 943:) 939:• 914:) 898:) 803:) 782:) 778:• 756:) 441:, 437:, 425:, 363:, 359:, 355:, 351:, 3755:( 3731:( 3719:( 3683:( 3661:( 3641:( 3630:) 3626:( 3613:. 3606:. 3486:: 3482:@ 3461:( 3421:: 3417:@ 3404:) 3400:( 3387:. 3380:. 3256:( 3229:( 3175:( 3153:| 3135:( 3120:( 3094:. 3060:. 3029:. 3019:2 2996:1 2979:. 2975:: 2915:( 2897:( 2880:( 2873:) 2864:) 2860:( 2837:( 2823:( 2806:( 2791:( 2770:( 2738:( 2720:( 2706:( 2692:( 2672:( 2651:( 2636:( 2620:? 2605:( 2583:( 2550:ö 2530:( 2511:( 2490:( 2473:( 2458:( 2434:( 2410:( 2389:( 2332:( 2302:( 2260:( 2230:( 2144:( 2125:( 2109:( 2088:( 2072:( 2046:( 2023:( 2004:( 1946:( 1922:( 1908:( 1889:( 1869:( 1809:( 1737:( 1714:( 1683:( 1668:( 1654:( 1635:( 1598:( 1583:( 1560:( 1540:( 1525:( 1453:( 1437:. 1429:( 1319:) 1269:( 1255:( 1215:( 1112:( 1097:( 1082:( 1067:( 1048:( 1011:( 984:( 961:( 935:( 910:( 894:( 799:( 774:( 752:( 708:. 619:. 510:. 483:) 479:( 420:: 380:: 346:: 329:: 322:: 270:: 257:. 223:. 143:. 42::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index