Talk:Abuse/Archive 1 - Knowledge (XXG)

3067:

indecent exposure in a general non-legal sense. Mere nudity can in some case be legal considered indecent exposure in some case without there being a consensus that children's exposure to such nudity is "child sexual abuse". as they define it. Nor would it necessarily be classified as CSA under the law either. depending on the motives of the person engaging in indecent exposure. It generally must involves intentional exposure of private parts in front of a child for the sexual gratification of the flasher/nude person or to shock or disturb the child. There is no consensus among CSA researchers that mere exposure to fully or partially nude adults in and of itself is sexually abuses and thus that should not be implied in the description of CSA in this article. Second, Viewing or engaging in sexual contact with a child's genitals is not in and of itself abuse if done for legitimate non-sexual purpose. The way it was previously written basically stated that doctors who conduct genitals exams of a child, parents cleaning their baby's genital area after a diaper changing, or a parent who looks at a rash on their child's genitals out of a health concern would be engaging in the crime of child sexual abuse, which is not true under most CSA laws or under CSA definitions used by CSA researchers. --

714:

constraints because of rules of aesthetics. The idea is to provide a short summary of each type of abuse and provide a link to the corresponding main article if it exists. The other purpose of the article is to cover common strands and concepts covering the different types of abuse in general and there is text after the "abuse types" which tries to cover some common abuse concepts (to be expanded). The fact that there are common strands can be seen by reading the short descriptions of the different abuse types as there is often similar text in each case. Also deleting entries that just redirect to other entries is debasing the value of the article. The article is not a laundry list - the whole point of the article is to explore interactions and overlaps between different abuse types. There is often common underlying psychology behind the different abuse types. --

933:, and have been tagged as such by others for literally years. There is a very substantial question as to whether a number of the subarticles are notable at all. Others, quite frankly, appear to be an abuse of the word "abuse", calling anything and everything imaginable as "abuse". To admit that the scope of the article is, for all intents and purposes, without limit and to have no real criteria as to what should nor should not be included is to admit that there is no notability, and no reliable secondary source report for the creation of this list. It does not matter if every single thing on the list is notable in and of itself. The list itself must be notable and sourced as a list. You might as well make up an article "People named "John" who have Knowledge (XXG) articles about them. This is just a glorified disambiguation page, that fundamentally violates 1240:

context. Although academic research suggests that a proper classification model for abuse would be a good idea I am not aware that anybody has managed to do one. Most of the abuses listed here contain the word "abuse". You could say that just about all crime is abuse but there are thousands of crimes and are obviously covered in crime articles and categories. Crime of course also partly reflects cultural values of what is normal and acceptable. Killing and maiming in war may be compulsory but in civilian life it is a horrendous crime. On the physical side there is basically just "physical abuse" listed. Also some abuses are words in common usage, some relate to psychology, some to sociology & social psychology etc.--

301:

Shouldn't the 'seen as part' be taken out? The next part is a sentence all on its own as a separate paragraph and looks very odd. Furthermore, it is worded very strangely. Firstly, abuse/harm can occur even if it is not someone's intention to harm another. It call also occur with or without consent, a person can be harmed/abused even if they give informed consent to something. This definition seems far too specific and ignores the multitude of circumstances in which it can occur. In fact, I'm going to be bold and erase these overgeneralizing disclaimers. Abuse is a very extensive topic and the many ways in which harm can occur should not be skimmed over!

1531: 1395: 2820: 495:. Can you clarify what you mean by encyclopedic ? Much of the article gives a short description of each abuse type which are generally described in detail in other articles. The idea of the latter sections was to cover common characteristics of abuse and it is intended to expand them. Yes this is a very important article but it is tough to work on and i think it best if it is changed slowly over time. Expansion and development of the latter sections also depends on finding suitable sources.-- 1019:

psychology" is ludicrous and laughable, and the little essay at the end is utterly irrelevant to the basic question here which you have proven incapable or unwilling to answer. Explain, for example, what the underlying psychology of Misuse of Statistics, or the informal logical fallacy of argument ad hominem, or flag desecration, just to use a few examples, have to do with the other things on this list, and don't just explain - provide reliable secondary sources not your own rationale.

894:

was depreciated by the edit done on the 13th of March which substituted "systems" with "animals". I have now put "systems" back in so that improves the sentence. There probably isnt any restriction in the scope of what can and cant be included in this article but it must be notable. Nearly all are deemed notable by the fact that they are deemed importance enough to have a separate Wiki article and any that dont have the potential in time to be developed into separate articles.

1806:, so much as they gave up (or in one case, just argued heatedly until someone broke it up). Furthermore, it's reasonable to believe that for every one editor confused with this system, there is one reader out there who is confused with the Index. The reader, however, won't get any clarification, and may simply conclude the article needs work or is confusing. They may leave the page altogether rather than tapping this vast resource of knowledge here. 1204:? This is just a list of categories, dictionary definitions, unreliable sources for unrelated topics and stuff. What's the thinking for putting all this together with almost no reliable sources, and "Further reading" sections stuck here and there in this list? I'm not sure what the purpose of this is, unless it's to see how many misleading piped wikilinks and redirects can be put in one place. Is there a rational for having different sections for 951:

underlying psychology etc) although not the same ones in each case. There is a debate to be had whether the scope of this article should be restricted, for example up to recently "substance abuse" and "drug abuse" was omitted. Just to mention "flag abuse" - that is obviously not just abusing an inanimate object as the action of destroying a flag has huge societal symbolism. Im not aware of any more notable abuses that need to be added to the

3086: 31: 1146:

typical from you, and are personal attacks on other editors beyond the bounds of this project. The burden is on you to justify, with sources, the things you've insisted in including in the vast network of articles you've claimed as your own. "I'll get to it later" would be more convincing if you hadn't made the same claim over dozens of articles for years, with no effort whatsoever to provide the necessary sourcing.

1835:

descriptions of the different abuse types as there is often similar text in each case. Also deleting entries that just redirect to other entries is debasing the value of the article. The article is not a laundry list - the whole point of the article is to explore interactions and overlaps between different abuse types. There is often common underlying psychology behind the different abuse types.

2745: 2638: 1482: 1345: 849: 757:

believe that most - cases of neglect do not result in the victim's demise. Either the person who wrote that was mistaken, or he/she/they wasn't using the word "demise" correctly. Poor word choice can easily result in misunderstandings; I'll update the article's definition (with references, of course) to prevent further misunderstandings.

2320:@Penbat: What are your thoughts on the matter? I have background in psychology, and the sciences (so you don't have to "dumb anything down" for me); I am happy to code, copyedit, and/or work on details; I'm a highly available Wikipedian, and you can drop me a line at my talk page, if you'd rather not discuss this here. 1834:

The other purpose of the article is to cover common strands and concepts covering the different types of abuse in general and there is text after the "abuse types" which tries to cover some common abuse concepts (to be expanded). The fact that there are common strands can be seen by reading the short

950:

Arguments about the notability or otherwise of an individual abuse type should be had on that abuse type's talk page not here. This article was originally just a DAB page but unlike other DAB pages there are many common threads, links and relationships between the differing DAB items (in terms of the

924:

It is no excuse for the sourcing on this article that is just mirrors other articles with bad souces. Clearly, you are very interested in this subject matter, and properly sourcing not only the portmanteau lists you've created, but also the individual articles themelves should be a priority for you.

820:

Sourcing: Looking through the sources, a great number of references are citations to self-published books from vanity presses, anonymous web pages, blogs, Wikis and the like. I have found only one instance where the self-published source (Fuller, Footnote #3) probably passes the "previously published

713:

It was originally a DAB page and i developed it into a proper article. Your attitude seems to be one of debasing and undermining the article. Firstly preconceptions of "long" mean just applying fixed notions of perceived appropriate packaging for Knowledge (XXG). It would be wrong to apply artificial

459:

asleep causes them to be hurt. I however do not sleep in the night, so the attacks can be sent to the West and their LGBT friendly societoes. I don't know who uses these methods obut the FBO should be able to home in in the perps, I think this is how whales are being beached also. As they try to save

370:

Hey Penbat, here's the command which can limit how many levels out the Table of Contents can go: {{TOC limit|4}}. That limits the levels to 4. But you can change it around. So, if you group the TOC so it has different levels, you can control how many are seen. But I don't know if you're interested in

3066:

The examples of child sexual abuse listed in this section were not entirely accentuate. There were two issues I addressed. The first is that indecent exposure is a legal term and what it constitutes can very from, jurisdiction and country. The term also has a cultural concept as too what constitutes

2497:

Take your time, Penbat. I am a little anxious to improve this article, but I've found other, less contentious ways, to do so. I heard you've gone through some pretty rough experiences with Fladriff, and (from what I've gathered from your user page) you're not that active anymore. Not sure if my last

1724:

They were appropriate before the list grew so big; today (i.e., currently, or nowadays) I believe the Index is not popular with editors, or they don't understand it. Many people have requested changing the structure, and you've defended your stance on the indexing system. Other people's remarks tell

1037:

No it is you who have ignored what I said. I already said that there is a discussion to be had about the scope of the article, for example I already explained that "substance abuse" and "drug abuse" were previously omitted. I also already said that although there are common strands for the different

1018:

And, you are pointedly ignoring what I have said. The interrelationships are not apparent at all, and there is no source to support the assertion that there is a relationship of any kind. The claim that there is any relationship whatsoever between some of these items, no less in terms of "underlying

572:

Admittedly I don't live in the USA, but Knowledge (XXG) is supposed to be universal. Where I live, disability pensions are part of welfare, and can be abused. Any article on the subject must make it very clear at the start, in which direction the abuse is going. I'd prefer to see a longer, clearer

543:

I take your point. I think that means there ought to be a summary in the lead of the material covered in the end sections describing common features of abuse. The end sections need developing more first i think to make that possible so it is balanced. Individual abuse types are generally studied and

282:

this is how they nail sportsmen and the weakened aura fields leave the sportsment viulnerable to being hurt as their antipodal double is being damaged and when asleep causes them to be hurt. I however do not sleep in the night, so the attacks cn be sent to the West and their LGBT friendly societoes.

591:

Hi there are some intrinsic ambiguities anyway. For example with Child Abuse "child" is the subject of the abuse but with Police Abuse "police" is the perpetrator of the abuse. Parent Abuse, for example, is confusing, does it mean abuse by parents to their offspring or does it mean abuse to parents

428:

22:43 wikipedia articles and it is not as if the length makes navigation difficult as the article structure is simple, only going down one level, and there are no long passages of text in each section. It is difficult enough doing this article at all, without having to make it conform to artificial

3040:

The TOC is practically useless, and in practice conceals the existence of the 2nd section and its subsections. There are mechanisms for overriding the default TOC structure, some of which facilitate custom-designing the presentation of the ToC, and some of which are stunningly easy ways to improve

2401:

In order to give a connection between the myriad different types of abuse, I have outlined three topics: Physical, Emotional, and Sexual abuse. It will consist of one paragraph each in detail. The lead will reflect the fact that they frequently overlap. On the page it will discuss similarities and

2250:

At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At

1829:

It was originally a page and I developed it into a proper article. Your attitude seems to be one of debasing and undermining the article. Firstly preconceptions of "long" mean just applying fixed notions of perceived appropriate packaging for Knowledge (XXG). It would be wrong to apply artificial

1411:

Sexual, rape, child on child sexual abuses are all distinct major subjects of study but obviously they have common features and threads and overlap to some degree. To illustrate the difficulty with lumping together, child sexual abuse could alternatively have been lumped together with child abuse.

1258:

In addition, the article focus is terribly conflicted. The first section practically lists everything even loosely related to the word "abuse", while the other sections straight-up assume this abuse is human-on-human. If not for the latter, this would be a decent disambiguation page instead of the

893:

The scope of the article is not stated to be "This article is about the mistreatment of people or animals. For other uses, see Abuse (disambiguation)". That is just a simplistic summary for the purposes of mentioning the DAB page. The real summary is the lead text given afterwards. Anyway the text

184:

Thanks to various clinicians who are compelled to find a label for any and every human social/emotional difficulty, "abuse" may be used too readily. The minimum criteria for physical, verbal, and emotional abuse, particularly can be very elastic. Early in the 21st Century, there is great concern

131:

I have nothing against both homosexuals and those who have an incest relationship (although both are a bit "sick" to me) but why is incest on the list? If we have incest on the list why don't we put homosexuality? I think that is a double standard. I think either we should remove incest or keep it

1385:

Hi. I am a 12 year old girl writing a speech on abuse. When I looked at this page, I saw some articles on different types of abuse that could have been merged in a way. For example: sexual, rape, child on child sexual abuse, and a couple more articles could be merged, like I said. So I would like

1145:

What I've noticed in your responses to me and to other editors across multiple article talk pages is that you have no interest whatsoever in discussing the scope of the articles over which you've claimed ownership or the sourcing issues which plague them. Condescending comments like the above are

993:

No you are misrepresenting what i just said. This article is an unusual case as it is about halfway between a DAB page and a fully fledged article. Converting the page to a DAB page would seriously debase the articles value. The text summaries of the abuse types often contain links to other abuse

1239:

There was a logical rationale here before it recently got mangled. There is no official consensus anywhere about what is and isnt abuse. The main problem is that it pulls in 2 different dimensions - specific style of abuse and specific context of abuse, but style also varies in some cases on the

1021:

Turning a DAB into a nonsensical article with no criteria and no sources whatsoever other than you own whim, and then having the audacity to rate it by yourself as Highly Important on two Knowledge (XXG) project is the height of arrogance. What an examination of individual articles shows is that

455:

in? The washing machine features in clothes I wear somehow because of the spin effect. this would be linked to LGBT hate ahdn Xian with Muslim fundos in the government, how can a person demand asylum for abuse that is not quantifiable? this is how they nail sportsmen and the weakened aura fields

300:

This is confusing to read, primarily the 'seen as' part. I would figure abuse is something that IS harmful, not just something that is seen as harmful. If something is not harmful but seen as harmful, the person seeing it as harmful would call it abuse, but if it was not, it would not be abuse.

886:

This article largely consists of summaries of different types of abuse. In most cases there is a separate article for each type of abuse and a link is given. The summaries are taken from the leads of these separate articles so any issues with poor quality references etc are a function of those

756:

abuse, whether the victim dies or not - certain legal provisions even treat "opportunity for probable harm" as neglect. For example, frequently leaving a baby home alone may result in child protective services taking the child. Of course, this is just one example showing that many - although I

2786:

template at the top of this article (or, even better, directly split this article, if you can), please. Many subsections, in "Types and contexts of abuse" section are not pertinent to "This article is about the mistreatment of people, systems or animals." For example some are pertinent to

2830:

listing a broad summary of all articles on all types of abuse, of which you can see there are many. There is no need to split topics from a set index page. If you think that the hatnote ("this article is about ...") is confusing or misleading, perhaps you could suggest better wording.

1603:. Your actions are mysterious to me, as well. When I went and tried to edit a little bit at a time, you said "we already have a system; refer to the talk page and bring it up as a proposal instead" (not verbatim). So here I am. I'm going to write this of "radical redesign" proposal 2669:

I have never logged into Knowledge (XXG) with a username or password. My computer has been hacked into on several occasions. I noticed on my favorites bar this site came up and it said there were administrators? Please investigate this situation as it is very disturbing for me.

2160:

Abuse is an umbrella term used to refer to the intentional or intentional harm of a person. It spans multiple types in different contexts. The three broad categories are physical (such as hitting), emotional (such as shouting), and sexual (such as rape). They frequently overlap.

1281:

As i have said before, there are quite a few common strands and relationships between the different types of abuse but not necessarily the same strands or relationships in each case. The later sections deals with strands and themes for a fair number of abuses but obviously not

1908:

reads: "The lead is the first part of the article most people read, and many read only the lead." So by making three small introductory sections following the very basic lede (and explaining that the 3 broad types of abuse often coincide) we allow readers to grasp abuse as an

843:

and "flag abuse", which are clearly neither, and a vast array of unrelated things whose inclusion is dubious at best (is "prejudice" abuse if not acted upon? Is antisocial behavior or incivility or rudeness "abuse"?...) I'm tempted to add an entry for "musical abuse" citing

851: 2200:

Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi.

199:

There is a problem with the Verbal Abuse link. The link directs you to a Texas band named Verbal Abuse which is completely irrevelant. Same goes with zoophilia or beastiality. I think beastiality is more of a candidate for abuse than voluntary homosexuality or incest.

2234:

Quid? si nos non interpretum fungimur munere, sed tuemur ea, quae dicta sunt ab iis quos probamus, eisque nostrum iudicium et nostrum scribendi ordinem adiungimus, quid habent, cur Graeca anteponant iis, quae et splendide dicta sint neque sint conversa de Graecis?

969:

If this is just a DAB page, then it should be cut down to a DAB page. I should not be an article unless the list is notable as a list. The notability of the list is whether reliable secondary sources present these items gathered together in this manner as a list.

283:

I don't know who uses these methods obut the FBO should be able to home in in the perps. I think this is how whales are being beached also. As the try to save the Nature spirit, the whales take the damage on behalf of the nature spirti, the elementals as well.

1942:

See also: Template:Bullying, Category:Bullying, Bullying in academia, Bullying in information technology, Bullying in medicine, Bullying in the military, Bullying in nursing, Bullying in teaching, Gay bullying, School bullying, Sexual bullying, and Workplace

2391:

The system I have proposed is to streamline the page by merging types of abuse (based on their similarities). Your system is excellent for those who already know all about abuse and want to research specific types, but we need to write for non-experts too.

1074:

that it doesnt cover the social psychology. It may get written one day. Misuse of statistics is widely used in coverups, deceit and power abuses etc. Article does say "In others, it is purposeful and for the gain of the perpetrator" - that needs expanding.

460:

the Nature spirit, the whales take the damage on behalf of the nature spirti, the elementals as well. The Monitheists want to kill the Polytheistic spirit to power tech. All humans involved are damned. This is a human rights and NATURE spirit abuse case.

925:

As for those individual articles, I see that quite a number of them are extremely problematic. Some are completely unsourced, others are extremely poorly sourced, and virtually all of them are replete with sources that do not meet the basic standards of

1702:, than they are with the titles of the Index. (Hereafter I will sometimes refer to "the user-interface concept of the extensive section-headings the reader is intended to browse through using the Table of Contents sidebar" as the "Index", for short.) 2369:. It's been a while (over 2 weeks) and I'm wondering why you haven't responded. Perhaps you've forgotten. That's why I'm paging you via username. I had thought you might be taking a WikiBreak or something, but I notice you've been active elsewhere. 451:

as i try harder to recall, more energy seems to go into the spin until tornados form there was a scene in Virtuosity (where the Sid 'android' looks like Miscavidge) where the hero had to stop a fan from rotating to save a child, how does this fit

210:

Incest is a crime and is shown to be destructive to families. It also invariably involves one party that is extremely domineering over another, calling into question the ability of the dominated party to consent. Homosexuality is none of these.

185:

for the victim and there may be times and situations when even a high level of discomfort should not be defined as abuse by others in that person's social constellation. An addition regarding this elasticity of definition might be in order.

2691:

article. If you have never created a Knowledge (XXG) account then there is little to nothing an administrator here can do for you. If your computer has been hacked into I can only suggest you obtain some sort of antivirus software.

1929:

From a coder's standpoint, linking to your own sections is generally a bad idea - any change in their names or categorization will break the link; we need to avoid that, keeping it only where editorial discretion dictates it should

2346:. Up to about March this year we had a star rating system at the bottom of every article and this article had a near perfect set of ratings from around 35 logged authenticated Wikiusers, better than almost any other Wiki article - 568:

I've never heard the term "disability abuse" before. I immediately understood it to be comparable to "welfare abuse". That is, people are on welfare, and shouldn't be, or are accepting disability pensions, and shouldn't be.

1562:

You will not lose privacy if you register as a Knowledge (XXG) user with a username. Choose a username that does not tell people who or where you are. People cannot find your email address or other personal details through it.

1709:. I genuinely believe nobody lands on this page wanting to read "Flag abuse" or "Ad hominem abuse". I think they'd search elsewhere for that, maybe on Wiki with "Flag abuse" and "Ad hominem" as search terms. Also, Wiki is a 1948:

is redundant. "Bullying in academia" is covered by "Academic abuse"; "Bullying in information technology" presumably by the "cyberbullying" link; "Bullying in medicine" by "Nursing abuse or abuse in nursing"; and so forth.

978:

compliant source are they related according to underlying psychology? No such source is cited at any point. Without those sources, this list is simply the original research of the Knowledge (XXG) editors who compiled it.

831:

Citation style: Many references are incomplete, in some cases so incomplete as to make identification of the source unverifiable. (EG #38 - is the entire catalog of everything Houghton Mifflin ever published the source

2341:

it. My argument is that this article is an unusual case and the approach I have used is the least worst solution - no strategy is 100% perfect but I maintain that the current strategy is better than the alternatives -

1537:

please make your request in a "change X to Y" format. In other words, please propose the precise wording here so that it can be evaluated and, with consensus, added. It would also be helpful if you'd provide multiple

1685:

If alphabetized listings are rewritten as prose, it would not only make the content clearer and more concise, but would automatically gives more relevant links for further reading. If someone has already read

1817:

is unreasonably long...far too many subtypes of abuse to cover them individually in an encyclopedia article. It should be changed into a disambiguation page, a list, or an outline (with appropriate grouping).

665:

Quite simply i have tried to use the most common expression for each abuse type. For example doing a quick scan of Google Books and Google Scholar, "Market abuse" beats "abuse of the market" by a big margin.

2528:

There's no hurry. FYI, Penbat has WIkiBurnout and is less active unfortunately due to what I think is personal abuse. He just does not have the stomach to get involved in contentious or complex discussions.

332:

I also find it confusing that the definition uses the word 'gain'. I do not believe that all cases of abuse stem from what the abuser can gain from the victim. It would be beneficial to clarify that point.

2551:

You're right about my undue haste. I jumped the gun here; I'll revert what I've removed. I have the feeling that (despite my best intentions) I come off to be a lot like that individual described before.

2914: 1022:

you've classified all sorts of things as "abuse" and added them to your various lists without any basis whatsoever, sort of like a workman whose only tool is a hammer, so everything looks like a nail.

294:

Abuse refers to the use or treatment of something (a person, item, substance, concept, or vocabulary) that is seen as harmful. A persons intent and motivation to cause non-consensual harm to another.

1509:

I am the author of a book entitled Abuse. Domestic Violence. Workplace and School Bullying, published by Cork University Press. I would like to add a section on the abusive personality. thank you,

529:. You're quite right that such development takes time; I'm sorry if I seemed to suggest that it could be done quickly or easily. This should be the goal that we are working toward, though. 2405:

Finer points will consist of notable events – child abuse, violence against women, the under-reporting of male sexual abuse, etc. – and will talk about different contexts and situations.

626:

They are usually given distinct meanings in the literature. Info for both of them needs to be tightened up. I plan to create separate articles for them eventually with decent citations.--

1900:

For the overview, I recommend each type - physical, emotional, and sexual abuse - placed in their own separate paragraph right after the first paragraph, with examples (I consider them

78:

and restarted with a basic definition. I will try to move some of the more encyclopedic information from the old one to this one over the next day or two. Feel free to help out or add.

1408:

Secondly I think the editor is confusing the fact that pretty much all abuses have common features and threads between them (although not the same features & threads in each case).

690:

is unreasonably long - 108 subsections at this point - just a laundry list of various types of abuse. It should be removed and made into either a disambiguation page for abuse, or a

828:

Dead Links: A lot of citations are to dead links, advocacy organizations that have gone out of business, etc. It is impossible to tell if these ever were reliable sources or not.

1056:

discussing in any way the "underlying psychology behind 'abuse of statistics', nor any source whatsoever to support your bald assertion that there is "quite a lot" of it.

1610:(@Penbat): It would seem you've reverted this article to the version before I ever started on it, undone all I have written, coded, or clarified. Since the Internet lacks 2982: 2978: 2964: 2915:

https://web.archive.org/web/20141229141744/http://lab.drdondutton.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/DUTTON.-1994.-PATRIARCHY-AND-WIFE-ASSAULT-THE-ECOLOGICAL-FALLACY..pdf

1893:

we can create lead sections that describe what most people want to know - i.e., what does the basic idea of abuse generally entail? How is it similar to other types?

994:

types so the interrelationships are apparent. Also at the end of the article a start has been made to cover the underlying psychology of abuse in general terms.--

2884: 1607:

as if talking to you, because you're the most significant contributor right now, but it can be applied to other editors, and other editors are free to comment.

2918: 1645:

to organize and synthesize this article the way you did. And I'm sure it was hard work all the while. I don't think your efforts don't count; I just want to

646:

Why are all the "Abuse of" alphabetized together and others not? For example, why is "Market abuse" under M rather than under A for "Abuse of the market"? --

2874: 2934: 1809:

As for the logical system you said existed on the talk page, I'm guessing this may be it here (feel free to elaborate if I didn't quite grasp the idea):

232: 1127:

I am not gong to waste my time giving you a lecture on psychology and social psychology. It clearly isnt your forte. And I dont give much credence to

737:

This section says that if the victim doesn't actually die, it isn't abuse. I wonder if the article isn't wrong about this particular type of abuse. --

835:

Scope: There is no rhyme nor reason, nor any consistent criteria as to what has been included in this list. The scope of the article is stated to be

2372:

I considered that perhaps my full proposal was so long it became an eyesore, with excessive detail. I have rewritten it with only the major points:

857:, this list needs to be based on reliable, secondary sources which gather together all these disparate concepts together, otherwise this is simply 2219:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat.

2207:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat.

698:(if outlines are still considered acceptable). There are far too many subtypes of abuse to cover them individually in an encyclopedia article. 168: 2673: 2616: 2538: 974:

According to what reliable secondary source are all the things in this list related? No such source is cited at any point. According to what

794: 2350:. I notice that the tool is still available on an opt in basis so it may be worth having it back for this article only to test the water. -- 2254:

Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr.

1038:

abuses they werent necessarily the same strands in each case. There is quite a lot of underlying psychology behind "abuse of statistics". --

2894: 1889:

Let's consider any type of abuse as some combination of the following 3 broad categories: physical, emotional/psychological, and/or sexual.

1372: 1321: 655: 2603:

Even if it was a list, back in April, it was heavily revamped as an article by Penbat before it was massacred by the indef-blocked user

2398:

The lead section we have now is a good start. I have no complaints with it at the moment, but note that the lead reflects page content.

1637:

trying to "hate on you", "diss you", or hurt your feelings when I make make the following criticisms of your style. Instead, I want to

270: 2804: 2796: 2470:

My point is page upkeep is essential, and that the less content that can change before we can repair it, the more accurate the system.

2244:

Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis.

316: 2347: 2337:

Hi I need about 2 or 3 days to read this properly and respond but I certainly dont feel offended and I certainly dont feel that I

2924: 738: 90:

The {{abuse}} tag is being inserted into a lot of articles where IMV it is unhelpful. Does anyone know where it originates from?

2225:

Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

2194:

Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

1113:

not psychology. I give exactly zero weight to the whims of Knowledge (XXG) editors adding articles to categories at their whim.

2280:

Consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua

1878:

While it's noble for you to wish to preserve this content - and to organize it accordingly - this is unwieldy for two reasons.

1832:

The idea is to provide a short summary of each type of abuse and provide a link to the corresponding main article if it exists.

1106: 762:

Hope I answered your question. Thank you for bringing this to somebody's attention (even if one of us answered you a bit late)

372: 244: 1542:

for the proposed content. Your effort to improve the article is much appreciated, as is your advance disclosure of a possible

816:

I have neither the inclination nor the ambition to go through all of this, but there are a lot of problems with this article.

510: 2885:

https://web.archive.org/web/20090618204928/http://noragging.com/index.php/Research/Reports/Ragging-History-and-Evolution.html

423: 2919:

http://lab.drdondutton.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/DUTTON.-1994.-PATRIARCHY-AND-WIFE-ASSAULT-THE-ECOLOGICAL-FALLACY..pdf

2213:

Nam liber tempor cum soluta nobis eleifend option congue nihil imperdiet doming id quod mazim placerat facer possim assum.

1614:, I'm going to say this frankly: it was kind of insulting, and you came off as bossy - as if you're the supreme editor who 2594: 2557: 2518: 2504: 2486: 2327: 1084: 767: 2875:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120619160335/http://familylives.org.uk/sites/default/files/When%20family%20hurts%202010.pdf

2411:

New content will be added. Not trying to alphabetize different types of abuse eliminates confusion about letter indexing.

3025: 2935:

http://www.surreycc.gov.uk/sccwebsite/sccwspages.nsf/LookupWebPagesByTITLE_RTF/The+different+types+of+abuse?opendocument

2498:

post sounded like I was pressuring you time-wise. I can get kind of obsessive about this kind of stuff. Happy holidays.

1919:

The meticulous way you insist on presenting the content significantly takes away from the article in certain respects:

3072: 2904: 2188:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisici elit, sed eiusmod tempor incidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

1568: 1462: 2888: 1868: 1706: 3093: 142:

Consensual incest is vanishingly rare: the overwhelming majority of cases are of child abuse by an adult relative.

38: 2751: 2644: 1488: 1351: 518: 167:

Unsourced and unverifiable. In any case, abusive incest is already include by 'Sexual abuse', so I'm removing it.

2878: 355:

The abuse template covers the disambiguation. There is quite a lot that can be written about abuse in general. --

2981:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1882:

You can't sync each and every article's summary here with updated content there: that's a nightmare to maintain.

2677: 2590: 2553: 2514: 2500: 2482: 2323: 1584: 1376: 763: 651: 1954: 1325: 3016: 2866: 2808: 2800: 2726: 2182:

Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequat.

691: 1317: 574: 3068: 2792: 1886:"...the whole point of the article is to explore interactions and overlaps between different abuse types." 1875:

kind of thing. All right. However, I do not feel that WP:IGNOREALLRULES is really justified in this case.

1564: 1458: 742: 544:

researched in isolation, but at the same time there are quite a few common strands between abuse types. --

419:

in the psychological characterisyics section. I was going to fix it but wasn't quite sure what was meant.

320: 1803: 1716:

After such a long time working on the Index it must be very hard to let go, but please consider this the

840: 468:

Much of this article reads like a dictionary definition. Indeed, the lead section very closely resembles

315:

Please would you add to the definition of Abuse, "Abuse may be intentional or unintentional". Thank you.

212: 3000:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2988: 2895:

https://web.archive.org/web/20090220222902/http://stopbullyingnow.hrsa.gov/index.asp?area=whatbullyingis

2607:

back in March 2013, and Fladrif's comments did not gain any support after that heated discussion there.

837:

This article is about the mistreatment of people or animals. For other uses, see Abuse (disambiguation).

229:

Take a look at the other talk pages concerning violence and abuse; they all surround each other. ~~J.S.

2865:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2827: 1102: 186: 1778:

Talk:Abuse#How_are_alcohol_abuse.2C_sexual_abuse_.2C_sectarianism.2C_and_humiliation_related_abuses.3F

695: 2955: 2839: 1551: 1519: 1515: 1442: 1071: 1053: 398: 394: 380: 376: 338: 1710: 473: 456:

leave the sportsment viulnerable to being hurt as their antipodal double is being damaged and when

647: 582: 240: 2722: 2343: 2058: 514: 3041:

usability over the default, in cases like this one, even if in the long term it deserves a truly

2898: 2697: 2612: 2579: 2534: 2395:

Prose will be its backbone – not an index – and will follow format typical for most Wiki pages.

1264: 1229: 1080: 790: 616: 274: 2985:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2079:

In case you are a visual person, I synthesized my thoughts in the following dummy page I wrote:

1933:

You seem to list everything anyone could ever possibly want to know about abuse and it's simply

1658: 975: 971: 934: 862: 854: 3001: 1389:

P.S I do not have an email, I have a blog, and I do not like to give peronal information away.

75: 2925:

https://web.archive.org/web/20100708031024/http://dynamic.uoregon.edu/%7Ejjf/articles/gf05.pdf

2114: 1151: 1118: 1061: 1027: 984: 941: 870: 79: 2408:

Repetitive content and esoteric content readers are unlikely to want to read will be removed.

526: 2687:

I am not sure what you are looking for but this page is dedicated to the improvement of the

2355: 1433:

To the person who made this request: you're right not to give out personal information. You

1422: 1287: 1245: 1136: 1092: 1043: 999: 960: 915: 719: 671: 631: 597: 549: 534: 500: 481: 434: 360: 306: 3008: 2338: 1905: 1615: 1543: 822: 522: 3052: 2832: 2788: 2513:

EDIT2: Okay, I'm done waiting. You can tell me your thoughts after I change this article.

2127: 1547: 1438: 1205: 1197: 1128: 1110: 900: 703: 393:

By the way, I think this is an excellent article; you've done well with this. Great job!--

334: 201: 133: 1895:

In other words, we create an overview, a very powerful tool that we don't have right now.

1539: 926: 858: 2967:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2780: 2098: 1310:

in this article. Why is it that on whole Knowledge (XXG) there is no article about the

1213: 899:

Incidentally Im now dubious whether we even need an abuse DAB page as I recently added

578: 266: 260: 236: 143: 101: 3007:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2974: 930: 2693: 2608: 2575: 2530: 1260: 1225: 1209: 1177: 1105:

to have include a chapter on social psychology. We've got a perfectly good article

786: 612: 420: 223: 91: 2928: 2905:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110611053853/http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=29633

2604: 2035:: I doubt many people will come looking for this. I'm well read, yet cannot define 1611: 1185: 1181: 1147: 1114: 1057: 1023: 980: 937: 866: 2889:

http://noragging.com/index.php/Research/Reports/Ragging-History-and-Evolution.html

1224:

is? Why are victims and abusers mixed up in the list with no apparent rationale?

1925:

I ask you to please allow others to edit the page under reasonable circumstances.

269:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

3101:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2366: 2351: 2061:

to be requested by the reader. Perhaps at an article about sports, but not here.

1839: 1592: 1418: 1283: 1241: 1189: 1132: 1088: 1039: 995: 956: 911: 715: 667: 627: 593: 545: 530: 496: 477: 430: 417:

in American society, females are, on average, approved of violence against males

356: 302: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1618:

this article or something (though I realize that was probably not your intent).

3102: 3048: 2973:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2879:

http://familylives.org.uk/sites/default/files/When%20family%20hurts%202010.pdf

2716: 1849: 1821: 1785: 1777: 1769: 1761: 1753: 1745: 1737: 1729: 1437:

need to give your email address or blog url on any Knowledge (XXG) talk page.

699: 47: 17: 375:-- the math section -- I just put in a cool new flowchart for math courses.-- 2712:

Please consider adding the following organization as another external link:

1076: 2908: 1891:

This eliminates confusion. Now we can just mention how they overlap. Thus,

592:

by their offspring ? Thanks for your suggestion and I will consider it. --

1109:

on the old adage. Beyond that, most misuse of statistics is explained by

601: 586: 476:

to give an encyclopedic overview of what I'm sure is an important topic?

3076: 3055: 3030: 2843: 2812: 2730: 2701: 2681: 2620: 2598: 2583: 2561: 2542: 2522: 2508: 2490: 2458:

has no anchor on the respective page (it moved and we didn't update it)?

2359: 2331: 1572: 1555: 1523: 1466: 1446: 1426: 1380: 1329: 1291: 1268: 1249: 1233: 1155: 1140: 1122: 1096: 1065: 1047: 1031: 1003: 988: 964: 945: 919: 874: 798: 771: 746: 723: 707: 675: 659: 635: 620: 553: 538: 504: 485: 438: 402: 384: 364: 342: 324: 310: 277: 248: 215: 204: 189: 171: 162: 136: 120: 94: 3042: 1079:

is definitely rooted in psychology or social psychology. I notice that

3062:

Improving child sexual abuse description as it was a little overbroad.

492: 469: 1720:

you provided, and be open to the possibility of change. Your efforts

1201: 525:, including introducing the topic and summarizing key content in its 1681:

with grouping, new sections, and deletion of non-noteworthy content.

1599:

in many different ways, and I seek better formatting and policy for

1951:

Too many links overwhelms the reader and detracts from the content.

2858: 2755: 2688: 2648: 1217: 952: 904: 687: 1725:

me this system is non-intuitive, unexpected, or causes problems:

2419:

Page size will be cut down, so more people are likely to read it

2039:

offhand, nor do I expect it to be (directly) linked on the page

1923:

You "correct" anybody who seeks to change the structure; and so

1221: 371:

doing this. I'm having fun with a new charting tool; check out

3080: 2739: 2632: 1476: 1412:

Individual abuse types often pull in two different directions.

1339: 839:

And, yet we have listed "abuse of statistics", which links to

25: 2899:

http://stopbullyingnow.hrsa.gov/index.asp?area=whatbullyingis

2940:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

2317:

To any editors abroad, if you're still out there: comments?

2067:: I can, as you've suggested before, use the Index sidebar. 1579:

Proposal for a radical change of the article's organization

2869:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

2461:

That "Abuse of Discretion" has a bare URL as its citation?

2422:

Since the page will have less content, it will load faster

907:

article so there is only a video game called "abuse" left.

472:. Can the page, or at the very least the lead section, be 3036:

Abuse of users via formatting of the accompanying article

2416:

Various advantages will be gained (here are just a few):

1649:

and present the data a bit differently. Also, when I use

1386:

your permission to edit a few of your articles on abuse.

1626:

Begin lengthy argument worthy of “Too Long; Didn't Read”

1595:, you're being very unclear regarding your this article 887:

separate articles and not intrinsically of this article.

2862: 2073:: Again, law term; few people know this or look for it. 1454: 509:

When I say "encyclopedic" I mean an article written in

271:

the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page

2251:

vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum.

1690:, for example, they are more likely to want to read 100:

Where the heck is this remplate located, seriously.

2977:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2574:This seems like a very long list, not an article. 2267:

acceptance of domestic violence in American culture

2717:CAPSA (Citizens Against Physical and Sexual Abuse) 1969:, using explicit wording. While different wording 1730:Talk:Abuse#Proper_general_article_on_abuse_needed. 1052:There is no information whatsoever in the article 694:, or possibly (with appropriate grouping) into an 2929:http://dynamic.uoregon.edu/~jjf/articles/gf05.pdf 2443:Did you know in the section "Child sexual abuse" 2629:Semi-protected edit request on 20 September 2014 2570:Reader feedback: This seems like a very long ... 2454:Or that in the section "Patient abuse" the link 2428:Errors can be spotted quicker. To make my point: 2388:Your system is confusing - namely, it's unusual. 2153: 1405:Firstly the edit request is not specific enough. 1964:list things in a manner that most people don't 1940: 1885: 611:Do we really need two separate sections here?-- 2963:This message was posted before February 2018. 1975:text-based redirects do not belong on the page 1871:would be a good statement of philosophy here; 2456:Foster care#State abuses in the United States 1827: 1811: 132:along with homosexuality. What do you think? 8: 1830:constraints because of rules of aesthetics. 1661:. Please do not take undue offense at this. 734:"thereby resulting in the victim's demise." 127:Incest and not homosexuality or beastiality? 2736:Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2015 785:All right everybody, it's time to move on. 491:Yes the first few lines are basically like 74:I moved the old version of this article to 2375: 2142: 1802:So I don't think you ever really received 1621: 825:. The rest of these need to be eliminated. 805:The following discussion has been closed. 781: 2857:I have just modified 7 external links on 2222:Notable others I didn't bother to include 1786:Talk:Abuse#Edit_request_on_14_August_2013 1713:; it doesn't have to include everything. 1705:As for pruning the unimportant content - 1641:because I imagine it must have taken you 1633:First off, let me say (@Penbat) that I'm 1457:is this IPA number's only previous edit. 448:The Malay Astral/Ethereal Torture Method 2909:http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=29633 2087: 1765:Requests for prose rather than sections 1639:thank you for what you have contributed 351:Proper general article on abuse needed. 3099:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2425:It will be more aesthetically pleasing 2297: 2292: 2287: 2123: 2122:Italic or bold markup not allowed in: 2112: 1754:Talk:Abuse#Economic_vs_Financial_abuse 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2952:to let others know (documentation at 2348:Knowledge (XXG):Article_Feedback_Tool 2277:(any other notable topic I've missed) 2273:X notable group view (CDC, WHO, etc.) 2264:corporal punishment used for children 1306:There are some 122 specifications of 521:also complies with Knowledge (XXG)'s 7: 1937:For example, the "bullying" section: 1101:No, it's not. It would be an absurd 1953:I believe we are, unintentionally, 1738:Talk:Abuse#Prune_and_very_long_tags 1657:my intention is to clarify, not to 2257:Societal reaction (examples below) 2170:(Overview of emotional abuse here) 1259:total clusterduck that it is now. 24: 2861:. Please take a moment to review 2167:(Overview of physical abuse here) 1915:that can applied nearly anywhere. 1904:of the lead, by the way). As the 1794:Personally, I saw the editors as 1789:Request for merging sexual issues 1473:Edit request on 18 September 2013 688:Abuse#types and contexts of abuse 169:The way, the truth, and the light 3084: 2818: 2743: 2636: 2043:. Perhaps under a page entitled 1529: 1480: 1393: 1343: 564:Disability abuse ---just sayin' 29: 2933:Corrected formatting/usage for 2173:(Overview of sexual abuse here) 2091: 1973:serve as a sort of "redirect", 1847:I paraphrased; original text at 1107:Lies, damn lies, and statistics 373:Summit High School (New Jersey) 2702:02:05, 21 September 2014 (UTC) 2682:23:45, 20 September 2014 (UTC) 1850:Talk:Abuse#Split_types_section 1762:Talk:Abuse#Split_types_section 1556:18:09, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 1524:16:32, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 1336:Edit request on 14 August 2013 724:08:47, 26 September 2011 (UTC) 708:08:19, 26 September 2011 (UTC) 311:17:54, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 1: 2599:00:08, 29 November 2013 (UTC) 2584:22:49, 22 November 2013 (UTC) 2562:04:52, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 2543:03:39, 15 December 2013 (UTC) 2523:03:04, 15 December 2013 (UTC) 2491:09:57, 30 November 2013 (UTC) 2360:09:21, 14 November 2013 (UTC) 2332:02:01, 14 November 2013 (UTC) 2101:. Wikisource. August 10, 2013 2053:: equally not notable. It is 1749:Requests prose in 3rd comment 1573:16:22, 13 November 2013 (UTC) 1467:16:28, 13 November 2013 (UTC) 1085:Category:Misuse of statistics 848:and the citations found here. 772:11:33, 10 November 2013 (UTC) 439:22:58, 20 February 2010 (UTC) 365:20:02, 24 December 2009 (UTC) 343:03:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC) 3077:05:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC) 3056:08:27, 15 October 2016 (UTC) 2803:) 06:44, 29 July 2015 (UTC) 2621:23:01, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 2589:Thank you for the feedback. 2509:02:49, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 1700:Corrective rape of LGBT folk 1578: 747:22:20, 17 January 2012 (UTC) 636:11:15, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 621:07:12, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 602:18:16, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 587:17:43, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 403:01:06, 14 January 2010 (UTC) 385:01:05, 14 January 2010 (UTC) 216:19:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC) 190:22:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 3031:02:51, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 2770:to reactivate your request. 2758:has been answered. Set the 2731:11:21, 7 January 2015 (UTC) 2663:to reactivate your request. 2651:has been answered. Set the 2179:School or academic settings 1815:Types and contexts of abuse 1773:Criticism (heated argument) 1503:to reactivate your request. 1491:has been answered. Set the 1447:06:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC) 1427:07:10, 15 August 2013 (UTC) 1381:22:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC) 1366:to reactivate your request. 1354:has been answered. Set the 607:Economic vs Financial abuse 325:02:26, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 163:20:03, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 121:04:14, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 95:14:20, 23 August 2005 (UTC) 3135: 2994:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2854:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2844:22:13, 4 August 2015 (UTC) 2708:Possible new external link 2013:"Abuse of the system: See 1798:after talking to you, not 1746:Talk:Abuse#Dictionary-like 1234:20:54, 23 April 2013 (UTC) 1141:14:04, 26 March 2013 (UTC) 1123:12:47, 26 March 2013 (UTC) 1097:09:06, 26 March 2013 (UTC) 1066:00:39, 26 March 2013 (UTC) 1048:17:24, 20 March 2013 (UTC) 1032:15:36, 20 March 2013 (UTC) 1004:07:30, 20 March 2013 (UTC) 989:01:34, 20 March 2013 (UTC) 965:18:49, 19 March 2013 (UTC) 946:18:28, 19 March 2013 (UTC) 920:18:08, 19 March 2013 (UTC) 875:15:05, 19 March 2013 (UTC) 676:14:00, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 660:13:12, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 249:13:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 172:05:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 2813:06:44, 29 July 2015 (UTC) 2481:I hope that was clearer. 2380:Reasonably-sized proposal 1863:system works better than 1757:Request to merge sections 1330:12:36, 28 July 2013 (UTC) 1156:00:07, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 799:21:31, 25 July 2013 (UTC) 554:20:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC) 539:20:31, 17 June 2010 (UTC) 505:19:33, 17 June 2010 (UTC) 486:19:10, 17 June 2010 (UTC) 278:15:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC) 1292:08:01, 8 June 2013 (UTC) 1269:07:54, 8 June 2013 (UTC) 821:expert" exception under 808:Please do not modify it. 429:packaging constraints.-- 205:04:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC) 137:04:18, 6 June 2006 (UTC) 82:21:23, 8 Jan 2004 (UTC) 2850:External links modified 2029:(just a few examples): 2015:Abuse#Gaming the system 1977:(that's the purpose of 1250:11:51, 1 May 2013 (UTC) 2793:Abuse (disambiguation) 2197:Parental/child-related 1945: 1873:The Road Less Traveled 1844: 1826: 884:Ref points 1, 2 and 3: 692:List of types of abuse 3097:of past discussions. 2156:Abuse: Draft Proposed 2008:Abuse#Substance abuse 1664:My proposal is to go 1200:on this list but not 575:Abuse of the disabled 235:comment was added by 42:of past discussions. 2975:regular verification 2826:- this article is a 2308:This uses dummy text 2204:War/military-related 2147:Really long proposal 1544:conflict of interest 1072:Misuse of statistics 1054:Misuse of statistics 415:I came across this : 287:Confusing definition 2965:After February 2018 2944:parameter below to 2591:meteor_sandwich_yum 2554:meteor_sandwich_yum 2515:meteor_sandwich_yum 2501:meteor_sandwich_yum 2483:meteor_sandwich_yum 2451:(missing a hyphen)? 2324:meteor_sandwich_yum 2065:Abuse of the system 1770:Talk:Abuse#Problems 1585:Meteor sandwich yum 841:Misue of statistics 764:meteor_sandwich_yum 682:Split types section 3019:InternetArchiveBot 2970:InternetArchiveBot 1800:agreeing with you. 1781:General complaints 1081:Category:Deception 1070:That is a flaw in 511:encyclopedic style 259:TfD nomination of 180:Eagerness to label 3122: 3121: 3109: 3108: 3103:current talk page 3069:Notcharliechaplin 2995: 2774: 2773: 2667: 2666: 2478: 2477: 2314: 2313: 2231:Scholary research 2216:Domestic settings 2139: 2138: 2023:You argue to keep 2006:"Drug abuse: See 1869:WP:IGNOREALLRULES 1867:in presentation, 1722:were not in vain. 1707:WP:NOTADICTIONARY 1696:Transgender abuse 1565:Anthony Appleyard 1507: 1506: 1459:Anthony Appleyard 1370: 1369: 1320:comment added by 1173: 1172: 426: 252: 67: 66: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3126: 3118: 3111: 3110: 3088: 3087: 3081: 3029: 3020: 2993: 2992: 2971: 2959: 2837: 2822: 2821: 2785: 2779: 2765: 2761: 2747: 2746: 2740: 2658: 2654: 2640: 2639: 2633: 2376: 2309: 2299: 2294: 2289: 2143: 2132: 2131: 2125: 2120: 2118: 2110: 2108: 2106: 2095: 2071:Abuse of process 2027:unneeded content 2025:(in my opinion) 2001:abuse in nursing 1912:abstract concept 1855: 1848: 1842: 1824: 1711:work in progress 1622: 1540:reliable sources 1533: 1532: 1498: 1494: 1484: 1483: 1477: 1397: 1396: 1361: 1357: 1347: 1346: 1340: 1332: 1312:"Abuse of Abuse" 810: 782: 696:Outline of abuse 424: 230: 160: 155: 151: 146: 118: 113: 109: 104: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3134: 3133: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3114: 3085: 3064: 3038: 3023: 3018: 2986: 2979:have permission 2969: 2953: 2867:this simple FaQ 2852: 2835: 2819: 2795:. Thank you. -- 2789:Substance abuse 2783: 2777: 2763: 2759: 2744: 2738: 2710: 2674:174.100.251.144 2656: 2652: 2637: 2631: 2572: 2479: 2381: 2315: 2307: 2305: 2284: 2278: 2258: 2248: 2242: 2239: 2232: 2229: 2223: 2217: 2211: 2205: 2198: 2192: 2186: 2180: 2177: 2174: 2171: 2168: 2165: 2158: 2148: 2140: 2135: 2121: 2111: 2104: 2102: 2097: 2096: 2089: 2085: 2057:, but it's not 1853: 1846: 1837: 1819: 1627: 1581: 1530: 1496: 1492: 1481: 1475: 1394: 1359: 1355: 1344: 1338: 1315: 1304: 1206:substance abuse 1198:human sacrifice 1194: 1192:related abuses? 1083:is a parent to 901:substance abuse 806: 780: 752:No, neglect is 732: 686:The section on 684: 644: 642:Alphabetization 609: 566: 523:Manual of style 466: 464:Dictionary-like 353: 289: 273:. Thank you. — 264: 231:—The preceding 227: 197: 182: 156: 153: 147: 144: 129: 114: 111: 105: 102: 88: 72: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3132: 3130: 3120: 3119: 3107: 3106: 3089: 3063: 3060: 3058: 3046: 3037: 3034: 3013: 3012: 3005: 2938: 2937: 2931: 2923:Added archive 2921: 2913:Added archive 2911: 2903:Added archive 2901: 2893:Added archive 2891: 2883:Added archive 2881: 2873:Added archive 2851: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2772: 2771: 2748: 2737: 2734: 2720: 2719: 2709: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2665: 2664: 2641: 2630: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2571: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2546: 2545: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2459: 2452: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2426: 2423: 2420: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2409: 2406: 2403: 2399: 2396: 2389: 2383: 2382: 2379: 2374: 2363: 2362: 2312: 2311: 2304: 2303: 2300: 2298:notable link 3 2295: 2293:notable link 2 2290: 2288:notable link 1 2282: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2271: 2270:feminist views 2268: 2265: 2262: 2256: 2246: 2240: 2237: 2230: 2227: 2221: 2215: 2209: 2203: 2196: 2190: 2184: 2178: 2175: 2172: 2169: 2166: 2163: 2154: 2150: 2149: 2146: 2141: 2137: 2136: 2134: 2133: 2086: 2084: 2081: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2068: 2062: 2048: 2033:Detainee abuse 2020: 2019: 2018: 2011: 2004: 1990: 1989: 1987: 1983: 1982: 1959: 1958: 1955:WP:OVERLINKING 1939: 1938: 1931: 1927: 1917: 1916: 1897: 1896: 1883: 1856: 1852: 1836: 1818: 1792: 1791: 1783: 1775: 1767: 1759: 1751: 1743: 1741:Note the title 1735: 1733:Note the title 1629: 1628: 1625: 1620: 1580: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1559: 1558: 1505: 1504: 1485: 1474: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1450: 1449: 1430: 1429: 1414: 1413: 1409: 1406: 1402: 1401: 1373:121.79.205.135 1368: 1367: 1348: 1337: 1334: 1322:92.192.101.231 1303: 1302:Abuse Of Abuse 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1253: 1252: 1214:binge drinking 1193: 1174: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1129:Hanlon's razor 1111:Hanlon's Razor 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 908: 896: 895: 888: 878: 877: 833: 829: 826: 812: 811: 802: 801: 779: 776: 775: 774: 759: 758: 731: 728: 727: 726: 683: 680: 679: 678: 648:Damian Yerrick 643: 640: 639: 638: 608: 605: 565: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 558: 557: 556: 515:coherent topic 465: 462: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 408: 407: 406: 405: 388: 387: 352: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 298: 297: 288: 285: 267:Template:Abuse 263: 261:Template:Abuse 257: 255: 226: 220: 219: 218: 213:138.88.125.189 196: 193: 181: 178: 177: 176: 175: 174: 128: 125: 124: 123: 87: 86:Abuse Template 84: 71: 68: 65: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3131: 3117: 3113: 3112: 3104: 3100: 3096: 3095: 3090: 3083: 3082: 3079: 3078: 3074: 3070: 3061: 3059: 3057: 3054: 3050: 3044: 3035: 3033: 3032: 3027: 3022: 3021: 3010: 3006: 3003: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2990: 2984: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2966: 2961: 2957: 2951: 2947: 2943: 2936: 2932: 2930: 2926: 2922: 2920: 2916: 2912: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2890: 2886: 2882: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2855: 2849: 2845: 2841: 2834: 2829: 2825: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2782: 2776:Please add a 2769: 2766:parameter to 2757: 2753: 2749: 2742: 2741: 2735: 2733: 2732: 2728: 2724: 2718: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2690: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2662: 2659:parameter to 2650: 2646: 2642: 2635: 2634: 2628: 2622: 2618: 2617:contributions 2614: 2610: 2609:Lord Sjones23 2606: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2569: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2544: 2540: 2539:contributions 2536: 2532: 2531:Lord Sjones23 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2511: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2499: 2493: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2469: 2460: 2457: 2453: 2450: 2446: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2427: 2424: 2421: 2418: 2417: 2415: 2410: 2407: 2404: 2400: 2397: 2394: 2393: 2390: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2378: 2377: 2373: 2370: 2368: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2340: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2318: 2310: 2301: 2296: 2291: 2286: 2285: 2281: 2272: 2269: 2266: 2263: 2260: 2259: 2255: 2252: 2245: 2236: 2226: 2220: 2214: 2210:Work settings 2208: 2202: 2195: 2189: 2183: 2162: 2157: 2152: 2151: 2145: 2144: 2129: 2116: 2100: 2099:"Lorem Ipsum" 2094: 2093: 2088: 2082: 2080: 2072: 2069: 2066: 2063: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2049: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2031: 2030: 2028: 2024: 2021: 2016: 2012: 2009: 2005: 2002: 1998: 1997:Nursing abuse 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1988: 1985: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1967: 1961: 1960: 1957:this article. 1956: 1952: 1947: 1946: 1944: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1926: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1914: 1913: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1887: 1884: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1876: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1857: 1854:emphasis mine 1851: 1843: 1841: 1833: 1825: 1823: 1816: 1810: 1807: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1790: 1787: 1784: 1782: 1779: 1776: 1774: 1771: 1768: 1766: 1763: 1760: 1758: 1755: 1752: 1750: 1747: 1744: 1742: 1739: 1736: 1734: 1731: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1723: 1719: 1714: 1712: 1708: 1703: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1692:Lesbian abuse 1689: 1683: 1682: 1678: 1677: 1672: 1671: 1667: 1662: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1647:build on them 1644: 1640: 1636: 1631: 1630: 1624: 1623: 1619: 1617: 1613: 1608: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1588: 1586: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1561: 1560: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1536: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1510: 1502: 1499:parameter to 1490: 1486: 1479: 1478: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1451: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1431: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1415: 1410: 1407: 1404: 1403: 1400: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1387: 1383: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1365: 1362:parameter to 1353: 1349: 1342: 1341: 1335: 1333: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1313: 1309: 1301: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1220:the same way 1219: 1215: 1211: 1210:alcohol abuse 1207: 1203: 1199: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1178:alcohol abuse 1175: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1073: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1005: 1001: 997: 992: 991: 990: 986: 982: 977: 973: 968: 967: 966: 962: 958: 954: 949: 948: 947: 943: 939: 936: 932: 928: 923: 922: 921: 917: 913: 909: 906: 902: 898: 897: 892: 889: 885: 882: 881: 880: 879: 876: 872: 868: 864: 860: 856: 852: 850: 847: 846:A Mighty Wind 842: 838: 834: 830: 827: 824: 819: 818: 817: 814: 813: 809: 804: 803: 800: 796: 795:contributions 792: 788: 787:Lord Sjones23 784: 783: 777: 773: 769: 765: 761: 760: 755: 751: 750: 749: 748: 744: 740: 735: 729: 725: 721: 717: 712: 711: 710: 709: 705: 701: 697: 693: 689: 681: 677: 673: 669: 664: 663: 662: 661: 657: 653: 649: 641: 637: 633: 629: 625: 624: 623: 622: 618: 614: 606: 604: 603: 599: 595: 589: 588: 584: 580: 576: 570: 555: 551: 547: 542: 541: 540: 536: 532: 528: 524: 520: 516: 512: 508: 507: 506: 502: 498: 494: 490: 489: 488: 487: 483: 479: 475: 471: 463: 461: 457: 453: 449: 440: 436: 432: 427: 422: 418: 414: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 404: 400: 396: 392: 391: 390: 389: 386: 382: 378: 374: 369: 368: 367: 366: 362: 358: 350: 344: 340: 336: 331: 330: 329: 328: 327: 326: 322: 318: 313: 312: 308: 304: 295: 291: 290: 286: 284: 280: 279: 276: 275:Joie de Vivre 272: 268: 262: 258: 256: 253: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 225: 224:Talk:Violence 221: 217: 214: 209: 208: 207: 206: 203: 194: 192: 191: 188: 179: 173: 170: 166: 165: 164: 161: 159: 150: 141: 140: 139: 138: 135: 126: 122: 119: 117: 108: 99: 98: 97: 96: 93: 85: 83: 81: 77: 69: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3115: 3098: 3092: 3065: 3039: 3017: 3014: 2989:source check 2968: 2962: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2939: 2856: 2853: 2823: 2805:5.170.65.168 2797:5.170.65.168 2775: 2767: 2752:edit request 2721: 2711: 2672: 2668: 2660: 2645:edit request 2573: 2512: 2496: 2494: 2480: 2455: 2448: 2445:co-operation 2444: 2402:differences. 2371: 2364: 2322: 2319: 2316: 2306: 2279: 2261:rape culture 2253: 2249: 2243: 2233: 2224: 2218: 2212: 2206: 2199: 2193: 2187: 2181: 2159: 2155: 2105:November 14, 2103:. Retrieved 2090: 2078: 2070: 2064: 2054: 2051:Umpire abuse 2050: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2026: 2022: 2014: 2007: 2000: 1996: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1965: 1963: 1950: 1941: 1934: 1924: 1918: 1911: 1910: 1901: 1892: 1888: 1877: 1872: 1864: 1860: 1858: 1845: 1831: 1828: 1814: 1813:The section 1812: 1808: 1804:WP:CONSENSUS 1799: 1795: 1793: 1788: 1780: 1772: 1764: 1756: 1748: 1740: 1732: 1721: 1717: 1715: 1704: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1684: 1680: 1676:prose format 1675: 1674: 1669: 1668: 1665: 1663: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1632: 1612:paralanguage 1609: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1591: 1583: 1582: 1534: 1514: 1512:Jim O'Shea 1511: 1508: 1500: 1489:edit request 1434: 1398: 1388: 1384: 1371: 1363: 1352:edit request 1316:— Preceding 1311: 1307: 1305: 1195: 1186:sectarianism 1182:sexual abuse 1020: 891:Ref point 4: 890: 883: 845: 836: 815: 807: 753: 736: 733: 685: 645: 610: 590: 571: 567: 527:lead section 519:good article 467: 458: 454: 450: 447: 416: 354: 317:81.99.104.50 314: 299: 293: 281: 265: 254: 228: 198: 195:Verbal abuse 187:207.178.98.9 183: 157: 148: 130: 115: 106: 89: 80:DJ Clayworth 73: 60: 43: 37: 3091:This is an 2956:Sourcecheck 2449:cooperation 2447:is spelled 2228:Information 2124:|publisher= 2045:Legal terms 1840:User:Penbat 1670:list format 1593:User:Penbat 1190:humiliation 1103:WP:COATRACK 36:This is an 3026:Report bug 2833:Ivanvector 2760:|answered= 2653:|answered= 2238:Statistics 2176:By context 2083:References 1822:User:Zodon 1548:Rivertorch 1516:Principal3 1493:|answered= 1439:Rivertorch 1356:|answered= 955:article.-- 739:95.34.7.47 493:wikt:abuse 470:wikt:abuse 395:Tomwsulcer 377:Tomwsulcer 335:Tmgonzalez 202:Zachorious 134:Zachorious 18:Talk:Abuse 3116:Archive 1 3009:this tool 3002:this tool 2828:set index 2824:Not done: 2365:Hi again 2344:WP:IGNORE 2247:Content B 2241:Content A 2191:Political 2185:Religious 2059:WP:LIKELY 1979:redirects 1935:too much. 1796:giving up 1718:next step 1688:Gay abuse 1535:Not done: 1455:this diff 1453:However, 1399:Not done: 1077:Deception 863:WP:SYNTH 579:Hordaland 474:developed 237:Jshephard 76:Abuse/old 61:Archive 1 3015:Cheers.— 2694:Cannolis 2576:Soranoch 2283:See also 2115:cite web 2047:, maybe. 2037:detainee 1986:Examples 1943:bullying 1659:WP:SHOUT 1651:boldface 1318:unsigned 1261:8ty3hree 1226:Farrajak 1176:How are 976:WP:MEDRS 972:WP:LISTN 935:WP:LISTN 855:WP:LISTN 778:Problems 613:Cybermud 513:about a 421:Fainites 245:contribs 233:unsigned 92:The Land 3094:archive 3043:bespoke 2942:checked 2863:my edit 2723:Moulton 2605:Fladrif 1930:remain. 1902:as part 1859:If the 1655:italics 1616:WP:OWNs 1308:"abuse" 1216:really 1196:Why is 1148:Fladrif 1115:Fladrif 1058:Fladrif 1024:Fladrif 981:Fladrif 938:Fladrif 903:to the 867:Fladrif 730:Neglect 573:title: 39:archive 2950:failed 2791:, see 2495:EDIT: 2367:Penbat 2352:Penbat 2339:WP:OWN 1966:expect 1906:WP:MOS 1698:, and 1605:worded 1419:Penbat 1284:Penbat 1282:all.-- 1242:Penbat 1202:murder 1188:, and 1133:Penbat 1089:Penbat 1040:Penbat 996:Penbat 957:Penbat 912:Penbat 832:here?) 823:WP:SPS 716:Penbat 668:Penbat 628:Penbat 594:Penbat 546:Penbat 531:Cnilep 497:Penbat 478:Cnilep 431:Penbat 425:scribs 357:Penbat 303:Tyciol 3049:Jerzy 2859:Abuse 2781:Split 2764:|ans= 2756:Abuse 2750:This 2689:abuse 2657:|ans= 2649:Abuse 2643:This 2164:Types 2055:valid 2041:Abuse 1865:Prose 1861:Index 1643:hours 1601:Abuse 1597:Abuse 1587:began 1497:|ans= 1487:This 1435:never 1360:|ans= 1350:This 1218:abuse 1212:? Is 953:abuse 927:WP:RS 905:abuse 859:WP:OR 754:still 700:Zodon 656:stalk 16:< 3073:talk 3045:TOC. 2946:true 2840:talk 2809:talk 2801:talk 2727:talk 2698:talk 2678:talk 2613:talk 2595:talk 2580:talk 2558:talk 2535:talk 2519:talk 2505:talk 2487:talk 2356:talk 2328:talk 2302:etc. 2128:help 2107:2013 1962:You 1666:from 1569:talk 1552:talk 1520:talk 1463:talk 1443:talk 1423:talk 1377:talk 1326:talk 1288:talk 1265:talk 1246:talk 1230:talk 1222:rape 1208:and 1152:talk 1137:talk 1119:talk 1093:talk 1062:talk 1044:talk 1028:talk 1000:talk 985:talk 961:talk 942:talk 931:WP:V 929:and 916:talk 871:talk 861:and 853:Per 791:talk 768:talk 743:talk 720:talk 704:talk 672:talk 652:talk 632:talk 617:talk 598:talk 583:talk 577:. -- 550:talk 535:talk 517:. A 501:talk 482:talk 435:talk 399:talk 381:talk 361:talk 339:talk 321:talk 307:talk 241:talk 222:See 70:Move 2983:RfC 2960:). 2948:or 2927:to 2917:to 2907:to 2897:to 2887:to 2877:to 2762:or 2754:to 2655:or 2647:to 1999:or 1971:can 1673:to 1653:or 1635:not 1495:or 1358:or 1314:? 1131:.-- 1087:.-- 154:Dan 145:Dan 112:Dan 103:Dan 3075:) 3047:-- 2996:. 2991:}} 2987:{{ 2958:}} 2954:{{ 2842:) 2836:🍁 2811:) 2784:}} 2778:{{ 2768:no 2729:) 2700:) 2680:) 2661:no 2619:) 2615:- 2597:) 2582:) 2560:) 2541:) 2537:- 2521:) 2507:) 2489:) 2358:) 2330:) 2119:: 2117:}} 2113:{{ 1981:). 1838:— 1820:— 1694:, 1679:, 1589:: 1571:) 1554:) 1546:. 1522:) 1501:no 1465:) 1445:) 1425:) 1417:-- 1379:) 1364:no 1328:) 1290:) 1267:) 1248:) 1232:) 1184:, 1180:, 1154:) 1139:) 1121:) 1095:) 1064:) 1046:) 1030:) 1002:) 987:) 963:) 944:) 918:) 910:-- 873:) 865:. 797:) 793:- 770:) 745:) 722:) 706:) 674:) 666:-- 658:) 654:| 634:) 619:) 600:) 585:) 552:) 537:) 503:) 484:) 437:) 401:) 383:) 363:) 341:) 323:) 309:) 247:) 243:• 3105:. 3071:( 3053:t 3051:• 3028:) 3024:( 3011:. 3004:. 2838:( 2807:( 2799:( 2725:( 2696:( 2676:( 2611:( 2593:( 2578:( 2556:( 2533:( 2517:( 2503:( 2485:( 2354:( 2326:( 2130:) 2126:( 2109:. 2092:^ 2017:" 2010:" 2003:" 1995:" 1567:( 1550:( 1518:( 1461:( 1441:( 1421:( 1375:( 1324:( 1286:( 1263:( 1244:( 1228:( 1150:( 1135:( 1117:( 1091:( 1060:( 1042:( 1026:( 998:( 983:( 959:( 940:( 914:( 869:( 789:( 766:( 741:( 718:( 702:( 670:( 650:( 630:( 615:( 596:( 581:( 548:( 533:( 499:( 480:( 433:( 397:( 379:( 359:( 337:( 319:( 305:( 296:" 292:" 251:. 239:( 158:D 152:† 149:B 116:D 110:† 107:B 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.