39:
21:
288:
My reasoning was that since the album series encompasses the song of the same name it would be easier to redirect to the album first (and then the reader could determine whether they still wanted more information and go to the song). I don't have particularly strong opinions about this however and am
125:
This is now a disambiguation page, so that should answer your question. Seems slightly debatable since the single is from the album (series) of the same name, produced by an ensemble often referred to by the same name. The album series contains five (?) albums all of which are also called
Adiemus
362:
When a redirect is changed to a dab page, incoming links should be chanced. Usually they will be edited to point directly to the target page so that there are no remaining links to the dab page. In cases where this is not done, my normal practice is to revert the page back to a redirect to avoid
261:
Standard guidelines for whether there is a primary topic fail somewhat here. The ensemble can be excluded for now since it is just a redirect to one (admittedly the main) member. Of the other two, neither is clearly of more lasting significance since they are closely related.
126:
plus a roman numeral plus some sub-title. Take your pick. I'd have redirected it to the album (or the ensemble, except it is currently just a redirect) and left the rest up to the reader since they're getting relevant information and links to more depth if they want it.
358:
following a move in 2017. The page curator tool sent my message to the original page creator (actually mover) from last year which may not be productive. As the "creator" of the redirect was a possibly-variable IP, here seems as good a place as any to raise this.
234:
It is perfectly normal to redirect from an ambiguous term to a primary topic article which has a different name. Less common when the primary article title is a parenthetical clarification of the redirect page. Still, I don't think that is a decider here.
197:
edit edging towards a war, consensus not yet established. My own interest was to review what is effectively a new article (previously only a redirect) and make some edits so that it is as effective a dab page as possible.
216:
revert. But it sounds like the question still stands, because then we’d once again have a redirect from a title with evidently no primary topic—if it had one, that article would and should be
193:
I'm not taking sides and can see the case for it being returned to a redirect. The revert you linked was actually a re-revert, so essentially an initial
414:
65:
165:
I understand. I was just pointing out that the question is now moot, in case anyone comes along and tries to work out what you were referring to.
363:
breaking those links. However, in this case the incoming links are somewhat mixed with many (in my non-expert opinion) not expecting to reach
313:
312:
I don't object to making the albums the primary topic, but if we're going to do that, why redirect to it rather than making it the title? —
111:
61:
46:
26:
221:
180:
152:
371:, changing them to reach their expected targets would be useful whether this page ends up as dab or back to redirect.
387:
317:
115:
51:
354:
This page has a number of incoming links from other
Knowledge articles. It was until recently a redirect to
266:
are interesting, but probably not decisive. The only person to express a strong view against a dab page is
225:
184:
156:
100:
367:
anyway. Still, these links should be addressed in the context of wherever this page ends up. Despite
395:
376:
279:
240:
203:
170:
131:
107:). If we need to do so because there is no primary topic, we need a dabpage at the ambiguous title.
368:
364:
355:
104:
391:
372:
275:
236:
199:
166:
142:
127:
194:
103:
for "Adiemus," there's no reason to use parenthetical disambiguation in the title (as
408:
330:
307:
293:
269:
110:
If we redirect an unambiguous primary topic to a parenthetically dabbed title… why? —
274:, so it would be good to hear if that was a philosophical or technical objection.
263:
326:
Retitling seems like a better solution, yes. My earlier actions were a mistake.
38:
20:
399:
380:
337:
321:
300:
283:
244:
229:
207:
188:
174:
160:
135:
119:
151:
back to a redirect, despite there being no primary topic. —
148:
56:
386:
Incoming links are fixed, barring talk/user pages and
64:, where you can join the project or contribute to the
289:
ok with a dab page if others feel strongly about it.
179:If the revert was against consensus, okay, cool. —
54:pages on Knowledge. If you wish to help, you can
390:. I'm happy whichever way this page goes now.
44:This disambiguation page is within the scope of
8:
50:, an attempt to structure and organize all
15:
60:attached to this talk page, or visit the
17:
7:
147:The question was more pertaining to
74:Knowledge:WikiProject Disambiguation
77:Template:WikiProject Disambiguation
14:
415:WikiProject Disambiguation pages
37:
19:
400:10:00, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
381:14:43, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
338:18:56, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
322:18:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
301:18:29, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
284:10:12, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
245:10:12, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
230:23:18, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
208:14:35, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
189:14:20, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
175:09:51, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
161:23:22, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
136:18:57, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
120:16:41, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
1:
212:No, actually I linked to the
99:If the album series is the
431:
47:WikiProject Disambiguation
32:
388:Adiemus (disambiguation)
159:) (same user as above)
80:Disambiguation articles
95:Dabpage or redirect?
92:
91:
88:
87:
422:
365:Adiemus (albums)
356:Adiemus (albums)
311:
273:
146:
105:Adiemus (albums)
82:
81:
78:
75:
72:
59:
41:
34:
33:
23:
16:
430:
429:
425:
424:
423:
421:
420:
419:
405:
404:
352:
329:
305:
292:
267:
140:
97:
79:
76:
73:
70:
69:
55:
12:
11:
5:
428:
426:
418:
417:
407:
406:
403:
402:
351:
350:Incoming links
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
327:
314:151.132.206.26
290:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
112:151.132.206.26
96:
93:
90:
89:
86:
85:
83:
71:Disambiguation
52:disambiguation
42:
30:
29:
27:Disambiguation
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
427:
416:
413:
412:
410:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
384:
383:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
360:
357:
349:
339:
336:
335:
334:
325:
324:
323:
319:
315:
309:
304:
303:
302:
299:
298:
297:
287:
286:
285:
281:
277:
271:
265:
264:The pageviews
260:
246:
242:
238:
233:
232:
231:
227:
223:
222:67.14.236.193
219:
215:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
196:
192:
191:
190:
186:
182:
181:67.14.236.193
178:
177:
176:
172:
168:
164:
163:
162:
158:
154:
153:67.14.236.193
150:
144:
139:
138:
137:
133:
129:
124:
123:
122:
121:
117:
113:
108:
106:
102:
101:primary topic
94:
84:
67:
63:
58:
57:edit the page
53:
49:
48:
43:
40:
36:
35:
31:
28:
25:
22:
18:
369:WP:NOTBROKEN
361:
353:
332:
331:
295:
294:
217:
213:
109:
98:
62:project page
45:
149:this revert
392:Lithopsian
373:Lithopsian
276:Lithopsian
237:Lithopsian
200:Lithopsian
167:Lithopsian
143:Lithopsian
128:Lithopsian
66:discussion
409:Category
333:Rosguill
328:signed,
308:Rosguill
296:Rosguill
291:signed,
270:Rosguill
214:first
396:talk
377:talk
318:talk
280:talk
241:talk
226:talk
218:here
204:talk
195:bold
185:talk
171:talk
157:talk
132:talk
116:talk
220:. —
411::
398:)
379:)
320:)
282:)
243:)
228:)
206:)
187:)
173:)
134:)
118:)
394:(
375:(
316:(
310::
306:@
278:(
272::
268:@
239:(
224:(
202:(
183:(
169:(
155:(
145::
141:@
130:(
114:(
68:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
