Talk:Al Plastino - Knowledge

1401:

Fringe science. I think the main concern is the source. The biggest problem is the fact that Plastino is not as public a figure as other famous people and a lot of times the mass media gets things wrong, and Evanier is, at least in my opinion, a reliable source for comics information, particularly since he's quoted a few other times in this article as well as hundreds of other articles featuring comics professionals. He's also been outspoken against pseudo-science in the past. My personal opinion is that we should give him the benefit of the doubt here and assume he did speak to Plastino's daughter, and that the daughter had no agenda involved. If we're going to leave the reference to GBS intact, I think we should bring back the blog entry as a reference. We don't have to say he died of GBS, but the reference is needed if we're going to include it. The only other solution would be to remove it, which leaves the article potentially incorrect and giving the implication that he died of Prostate Cancer. Not actually stating the confirmed cause of death is a good idea. Again, I'll leave it up to you guys to decide.

1600:

potentially has a lot of effect on all Comics articles. In addition, I fear that this is not based on the blog itself, but because you personally doubt that GBS can be caused by Influenza vaccines. However, there's enough reported evidence that it can. The CDC lists all side effect from Vaccines and they do list GBS as a credible (but rare) side effect from Influenza--and I doubt they or the FDA would put this warning on them based on fringe science. You and I will probably disagree on that--Maybe we should ask people from whatever Knowledge Project involves medicine to provide opinions, as it seems nobody in this topic is an expert. But, regardless of all that, what would be the harm to the article to put the reference in there, especially if the article itself is not written to confirm it, only that he had it.

1207:

written from the viewpoint of his death. This may be what you expect in a newspaper bio released to coincide with his death, but it's not IMO the best way to handle a general encyclopaedia bio. I guess this happend because the sources and section only came after the death, but it doesn't mean we can't do better. If we rewrite the section, particularly since we even have sources from before his death mentioning his protrate cancer it would only be natural to mention that before we mention his death and in a seperate sentence. Hopefully that will reduce concerns. A better more chronological wording would be something like 1) Where he lived 2) His wife 3) His children 4) Prostate cancer 5) His death.

1528:"assumption" is meant that as editors, we try to make judgements on whether or not the source is credible through research and consensus, and that, based on all the quotes given to his blog in Comics, he acts as a credible resource, at least when covering people in the industry. Based on the arguments above here and on other pages, I think Evanier has proved merit in that regard. I also think that if he says he talked to X professional or Y relative, he's telling the truth. So I think we can agree on that. If we can't, then that leads to considering all his other work potentially unreliable and removable, including the quotes in this article. 2539:

have a record of statement by a family member. If it was the LA Times that got the quote and the newspaper made no other comment, would that statement it be challenged as well? I am not advocating changing the text of the WP article at all, I'm not even advocating putting back the source in the article, but I want to get an idea from others what they think and if they agree with your statements. If, based on their responses, I feel strongly that you're wrong, I might request an RFC about it, but we're not even at that level, I'm simply soliciting other opinions right now. We should not be afraid to discuss this amongst ourselves.

1566:

NPOV, which means we aren't supposed to judge if a person's opinion is correct--if the opinion is reported, it usually can be quoted. If the quote in the article said something like "Mark Evanier reports that Mary Plastino says he died of GBS", why would we want to censor that quote? Controversial statements get reported in article all the time. It would not damage the credibility of this article to report that. My personal concern is that this appears to be an attempt to set the record straight about the death that was allegedly reported inaccurately, especially if we don't confirm the cause of death in the statement.

889:

WP:Verify can cause when you want to fix mistakes. You seem to be escalating this way too quickly--why didn't you try to get the WP:Comics group involved first, assuming I'm a vandal. There's no evidence there's "tag teaming" of the article in the logs--if you saw dozens of IP users and/or dozens of users, then you should worry. I'll leave the part alone. But in the future, rather than assume a hostile tone and quickly revert, why not try civil discussion first instead. I am certainly not trying to cause a problem, but even WP's own article makes a valid claim that GBS can be caused by vaccines

1439:"I think we should ... assume"? That's not how Knowledge or even basic research works. Assuming anything is personal POV. I reiterate my disagreement. Evanier is not a journalist and didn't vet her fringe science claim — and yes, it's fringe science since. Responding to the first editor above, where does the CDC say "at most 2 people per million."? The confluence of studies since 1977, according to the book JRT cited at the GBS article, says "either an extremely small increased risk following immunization (under one additional case per million vaccinations) or no increased risk." 2595:

cite the LA Times. 1) We don't required to state cause of death; 2) that he had prostate cancer and GBS is already cited; 3) we don't a need to deny something that article doesn't say; 4) we don't need an additional cite to say he had GBS. So, yes, trying to shoehorn in the Evanier cite is wrong on several levels. It's a backdoor way of allowing the family to air its grievances and make a fringe-science claim without it being in the actual article. I personally find it shameful to see anyone try to use Knowledge in that way. --

139: 2400:. We can mention GBS as the cause, but not the vaccine connection if that is not accepted by the scientific community. The fact that the controversial latter claim may be unacceptable, doesn't mean that that we have to ignore the uncontroversial former claim as well. Ultimately, I'm not going to challenge a consensus to omit any cause of death; What's more important as I see it is that any fringe claim, if determined as such, is kept out of it. 3041: 2937: 1072:

unfounded. However, JRT has at least twice cited sources that do not say what he claims they do. Tenebrae addressed his citation of the WP article on GBS, and I will address his citation of NIH. JRT cites the passage of the NIH webpage he linked to that says "In rare instances vaccinations may increase the risk of GBS." But for a thing to increase the risk of an illness is not the same thing as saying that it

293: 198: 171: 77: 53: 22: 2975: 2710: 208: 1052:, Mark Evanier may be a reliable source on Comics, that does not make him a reliable source on causes of death. And blogs, except from recognized subject matter exports, are usually not reliable sources, particularly on BLPs. (The exception is blogs published by a magazine newspaper or similar organization, and subject to the same editorial control as the rest of their publications.) 1848:, I'm unclear, so do you think we can reference the blog where we indicate he had GBS? I'm not talking about stating that he died from the vaccine, but do you think we should attribute the blog for the statement saying he had GBS? Because unless there's another reference, there should be a link to that article indicating that he had GBS. 1681:

isn't mainstream though the idea that older flu vaccines did very occasionally do so is accepted) we'd need authoritative medical opinion, based on evidence, rather than a comics expert. I also wouldn't think this specific causal claim worth reporting here, even as a claim, without such medical opinion. I hope this helps.

87: 2212:

But at least in my opinion it is hypocritical to complain about using Evanier as a source when reference 13 also has him providing an obituary. Thirdly, I see nothing about adding a additional reference that would harm the integrity of the article in its context. But I'm not going to edit it now.

2211:

First of all, I am trying to build consensus by asking other people--neither you or I are in charge of the article, and I am sincerely asking other people--at least one other person disagrees with your opinion. Secondly, I didn't see the reference because it's locked and I did not see the reference.

1910:

cite obviating the need for it? We're not hear to shill for the family. The article cites an actual, major newspaper saying he had GBS. I've placed the footnote just now right at the mention of GBS rather than just at the end of the next sentence. We have a real newspaper and a real journalist citing

1680:

This issue raises problems with source reliability, but I think they're soluble. That the family reports diagnoses is reliable, I'd suggest, and for this purpose so is the source. If we want to support a claim that this particular case of GBS may have been caused by this particular flu vaccine (which

1165:

the official cause of death was. At least one reliable source, PBS Newshour, says prostate cancer. The daughter says GBS but she also says GBS caused by a vaccine, so unless she states that she is quoting the death certificate, she is not a credible source — and not disinterested or unbiased, since a

561:

People with a history of Guillain–Barré Syndrome (a severe paralytic illness, also called GBS) that occurred after receiving influenza vaccine and who are not at risk for severe illness from influenza should generally not receive vaccine. Tell your doctor if you ever had Guillain-Barré Syndrome. Your

2625:

Personally, for me, the question is not if the Plastino quote is objectively believable from a scientific sense, that's not for WP to judge, I think the question was can we assume that Evanier got an accurate quote, which apparently based on his past track record is accurate. As long as the article

2360:

To be fair, I was and am no longer advocating that we change the statement in Knowledge. In today's discussion I was simply suggesting that we perhaps keep the reference to that blog entry by Evanier since I feel a quote from the daughter was notable, especially since we felt it was okay to use him

688:

Calm down. First of all, assume good faith. You seem to be getting really angry over a minor edit. Can you point to me any link that says his family is suing? Also, even going to the WP article itself, GBS may be linked to vaccines, as there ARE scientific studies that link the disease. Believe

2594:

Whereas I, with all respect to Night, don't believe we can pick and choose which half of the quote to believe. And as at least one other editor says above, we don't need to include a cause of death for a 91-year-old. As for the prostate cancer, the article doesn't say he died from that and we don't

1206:

While I don't personally feel the personal life section implies prostrate cancer contributed to his death (although I'm unclear whether it's even been firmly ruled out), how about we reword it? I'm not sure that the section is that well written anyway as it seems a bit odd to me that the section is

939:

say vaccines cause GBS! In fact, it says the opposite: "pidemiological studies since have demonstrated either an extremely small increased risk following immunization (under one additional case per million vaccinations) or no increased risk." And you're surprised someone might take what you call a

888:

Again, who is "tag teaming". I'm the only person making edits, check the logs. One person tried to correct it without a source, then I used a source. You reacted hostile to the correct, first chastising Evanier when he's probably just perplexing having to deal with the problems WP:Notability and

2341:

That proposal has serious problems. The current wording is fine as it provides an accurate summary of what is known, and it is unlikely that any claims about precisely what caused the death of someone aged 91 are accurate, unless the cause was something external like a car accident. Has a suitable

1731:

Exactly. We've accepted the family's claims that he had prostate cancer and GBS. That's already in the article. But without more credible sourcing than a daughter who wants to blame a vaccine for her father's death, whether for a future lawsuit or any other agenda, we cannot credibly say what this

1565:

of whether or not his daughter is correct in her statement. Even if you don't believe she is telling the truth, why can't we leave in the fact that he had GBS (as it is written now, or was under the lock, where we don't say he died of it) and simply provide a reference to that blog. Knowledge is

1400:

FYI, I will not edit the article myself, but in response to this recent comment, I think because GBS is a possible (even if it's very rare) occurrence to the flu shots (there would not be a warning label on the shot if it wasn't), its a plausible cause of death, and would not be in the category of

1080:

to opportunistic infections that cause death. This underlines the complexity of the interactivity of different agents on the body. But the bottom line is, if vaccinations cause GBS, then it should be easy to cite sources that clearly state this. The NIH webpage does not. Without such sources, that

2685:

This discussion is pointless—everything has been said above. There is no scientific analysis of the cause of death so there can be no meaningful statement on that. Further, there is no need for this article to make a pronouncement, and the current text is fine. There is also no need to respond to

2538:

says, Evanier is considered a reliable source for getting a quote from a family member in his industries (and is used in many WP article), and there's a apparently disputed claim from another source (USA Today) saying he died of the Prostate Cancer, so I think it's a good thing for the article to

1141:

In my own family, a great-uncle died from cancer. Family lore blames this on exposure to radiation during his service onboard one of the earliest nuclear submarines in the US Navy. No one has medical proof of this but it is received wisdom within my family. The Plastino family may certainly state

2895:

The only "problem" was I am pointing out that the statement from Plastino's daughter was not an attack on Knowledge, but a statement about what happened elsewhere. I am responding to Tenebrae's comments, which seem to imply that statement was an attack against the article, rather than a wish to

2746:"Many published news sources said that the prolific veteran comic book artist and cartoonist Al Plastino died from Prostate Cancer so that is what got reported on Knowledge. I have been in touch today with Mr. Plastino's daughter, MaryAnn Plastino Charles, and she says that's not so. She writes… 649:

to perpetuate their edit-warring. This is disgraceful. To try to push a fringe view that flu vaccines cause GBS is irresponsible. If this were true, why isn't there an epidemic of GBS? Do you think vaccines cause autism as well? This evident desire to use Knowledge to help the family score a big

1599:

You said we shouldn't "cherry pick" Mary's statement, but, in my opinion, by omitting this article from Evanier we're basically saying we don't trust that he's reporting what has been reported to him, and I think that opens up a can of worms where we no longer trust him to be a source, which is

962:

Again, there are several sources. Take this source from the National Institute of Health: Guillain-Barré syndrome can affect anybody. It can strike at any age and both sexes are equally prone to the disorder. The syndrome is rare, however, afflicting only about one person in 100,000. Usually

1166:

claim of vaccine-created GBS can be the basis for a lawsuit. Given such conflicting reports and uncertainty, the safest, most conservative and most accurate thing for an encyclopedia to do is not state a cause of death at all. It is in no way required, and it is clearly a contentious issue. --

1071:

If the notion that vaccinations cause GBS is indeed accepted by a consensus of the medical establishment (that is, it's been confirmed sufficiently through peer review that it is regarded as a fact), then there should be sufficient sources for this, in which case Tenebrae's concerns would be

1633:

I understand the need to be careful with sources, etc. I just fear by challenging on this fact, we're lessening the credibility of Evanier as a source, which could damage several articles, and in an area where an expert like him is more likely to get facts right than a mainstream newspaper

1527:

I think you misunderstand what I meant by assumption. First off, Evanier might even count as a journalist, since he wrote for Comics Buyers Guide, and there does appear to be consensus that he is considered a credible resource where reporting on comics and television professionals is. My

1007:

You know what, I have caught you in misrepresentations of what Knowledge and CDC says, and I'm not going to chase down your other claims to see what they misrepresent. I think the quote about what the studies over the course of the last 36 years conclude makes my point better than I could.

2534:, I think it's still important to hear from your peers on this issue. You are making an assumption that there is a deliberate attempt to game the system, and assuming the family has "grievances" (nothing in the quote even indicates that). The reason why I advocate for the quote is, like 389:

I just posted a correction to the cause of death. Mark Evanier, who I believe would count as a reliable source on Knowledge (see references and I think whatever working group for comics reporting exists on WP can vouch for his notability and reliability has posted an update here.

1293:

Normally I'd agree with Nightscream, yet she's not just saying GBS was the cause of death — she's saying GBS from a vaccine was the cause of death. I'm not sure we can pick and choose which part of a sentence to believe. Either the whole thing would be credible or none of it

2749:…some of the news stories were incorrect about my father's death. He did not die from Prostate Cancer. He was in good health up until receiving a flu shot and developed Guillan Barre Syndrome which paralyzed and killed him very quickly. Please edit out the Prostate Cancer." 336:

nor in a search, using that page's search box, for "birth date," which produced some results but nothing pertinent. The MOS is very widespread so I may have missed it. If that editor or another could point us to it, that would be helpful and collegial. With thanks,

1789:

on citing him for comic-book history and related topics. This is a couple of times now you've tried to use the fear appeal of "oh, if we don't him here that calls him into question for all his cites in WikiProject Comics!" It absolutely does not. Enough, please.

1363:

To be fair, according to the CDC link cited above, the flu vaccine can cause Guillain-Barre syndrome, but only does so in at most 2 people per million vaccinated. So while unlikely, it is possible (though of course prostate cancer is much more so).

2918:

article so that it says he died from GBS. Nothing wrong with relating the family's statement that he did not died from prostate cancer, but the mortality of GBS needs to be clarified, per my arguments above at the bottom of the previous section.

744:

claims the vaccine caused the GBS. I defy the family to find a doctor to confirm that definitively. Maryann Plastino is not a doctor and she is not a disinterested, unbiased party, and her efforts to blame a vaccine without proof is shameful.

963:

Guillain-Barré occurs a few days or weeks after the patient has had symptoms of a respiratory or gastrointestinal viral infection. Occasionally surgery will trigger the syndrome. In rare instances vaccinations may increase the risk of GBS.

2626:

itself doesn't advocate she was correct in her assumption, I don't see it violating WP:FRINGE. I just worry that you're letting your own beliefs on what you find "shameful" to influence censoring information out of an article needlessly.

513:

But more importantly, GBS is known to be caused by flu vaccines, this isn't "fringe science", it's actual science. Please read the description of the disease itself. In fact, the CDC flu shots always have a warning about GBS like here:

1266:

that JRT provided, which clearly indicates that GBS can be fatal, I don't think there's anything wrong with mentioning that it was the cause of the death, since his daughter indicated as much, as long as we omit any mention of vaccines.

2276:

And please: "I didn't see the reference because it's locked"?? "Locked" doesn't mean you can't look at the article. The reference has been there practically from the day Plastino died. Let's try to keep this on an honest keel, please.

567:

This personal campaign by a subject's family and friends to blame a vaccine goes too far when they deliberately misrepresent the CDC. You're claiming causation when the CDC refers to something occurring after a vaccine was given —

2565:

JRT, I'm saying that I don't have a problem with the article stating he died of GBS, as long as it does not state that the GBS was caused by a flu vaccine. The family and Evanier are reliable for the former, but not the latter.

2429:

I think because GBS is a possible (even if it's very rare) occurrence to the flu shots (there would not be a warning label on the shot if it wasn't), its a plausible cause of death, and would not be in the category of Fringe

1332:

As well, I'm not sure that with a 91-year-old, as opposed to, say, Philip Seymour Hoffman, that it's necessary to give a cause of death at all, especially under these contentious circumstances. We're not required to, anyway.

1126:. So it is a fatal disease, and there are reports of it, though most people who get it eventually make a full or partial recovery. I think it's reasonable to take the word that Plastino's death was caused by the disease. 2841: 967:

If you read enough, there is a link to vaccinations causing GBS. This is not "fringe science". I can get other links for you, but GBS being linked to vaccinations is noted and part of the diseases description.

1484:

The article, by not giving a cause of death that can be evidenced with absolute certainly, is written conservatively and correctly. Another editor feels we should make a minor chronological change, which I also am

364:

the opening parentheses. This keeps that date stretch clean. Some don't like having re-usage of the dates in the article, so I use years in the body, instead. I think it's more about appearance than a guideline. —

486:. The daughter is quoted as saying he died of Guillain–Barré , and normally that's enough. But because she also makes a fringe claim that it was caused by a flu vaccine, that makes the entire statement suspect.-- 3112: 153: 3107: 3074:

Although Plastino served in the Army during World War II era, there are no reliable sources found as of yet state that he was in a war zone during the war. More specifically, the sources do not establish

331:

obit, not Plastino's official site. Also — and I'm not saying the guideline doesn't exist, but just that I can't find it — I couldn't find anything about not citing birth and death dates in the lead at

2021:

It seems fine to me. I just suggest that we should avoid the claim of causality. I'd probably say that "the family report that he was suffering from prostate cancer and GBS" or something like that.

1064:

Tenebrae and the others are correct. While citing Mark Evanier's site would certainly be acceptable if he were merely relating the cause of death as given by the family if that cause of death were

825:

If it cannot be sourced that the flu vaccine caused the ailment, it should not be in the article, it's libelous at best. I understand trying to assign blame, but it needs evidence, not conjecture.

1634:

journalist with only a passing interest in the subject. Regarding the article itself, I'd either remove references to both illnesses, or keep them both in there and add the reference for GBS.

3025:

Good point: "Plastino" could be Spanish or any number of ethnicities. The article is fully protected till March 8, but without sourcing, "People of Italian descent" should not be a category. --

834: 2842:

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&authuser=0&q=Al+Plastino+Prostate&oq=Al+Plastino+Prostate#authuser=0&gl=us&hl=en&q=Al+Plastino+Prostate

302: 181: 1561:

So, considering that, let's assume as fact he did speak to Plastino's daughter. Why is that post not considered a reliable source of simply getting a quote from the Plastino family

3137: 148: 63: 2346:, the daughter's opinion could be noted, but it is not DUE. There is no need to authoritatively state the cause of death, which just as well because there is no suitable source. 3117: 1773:

To JRT: I've already explained what the harm would be of adding a comic-book authority citation for a non-vetted fringe-science claim. And i don't believe you understand how

740:

First, people can file a lawsuit anytime, and waiting until after published sources spread the unverified claim that the vaccine killed him is a strategy. Second, no source

1068:, it is not acceptable if the cause of death involves citing a mechanism that is not accepted by the scientific/medical establishment, and/or is considered pseudoscience. 428:

Many published news sources said that the prolific veteran comic book artist and cartoonist Al Plastino died from Prostate Cancer so that is what got reported on Knowledge.

2802:

At the time of his death on November 25, 2013, at Brookhaven Hospital in Patchogue, New York, Plastino had been suffering from prostate cancer and Guillain-Barré syndrome.

2880:

sources got it wrong? The only relevant issue here is whether the Knowledge article did. It does not state that prostate cancer caused his death. So what's the problem?

2420:. The fact that they use the word "associated", as well as the equivocating qualifier "small possibility that...", would seem to indicate that a causal relationship has 2405:

To be fair, according to the CDC link cited above, the flu vaccine can cause Guillain-Barre syndrome, but only does so in at most 2 people per million vaccinated.

3142: 231: 3147: 2342:

scientific analysis of the cause of death been performed? Another problem is that the daughter is not a reliable source for the cause of death. If it were

357: 807:, all of which are cited here. But because you and the others are tag-teaming, I can't even go in to put a "cite" tag on this claim. Yet you're violating 237: 3079:

role in World War II. Accordingly, "Category:United States army personnel of World War II" was removed until a defining role is established. Semper Fi!

1781:, which states (emphasis added), "The reliability of a source depends on context. Each source must be carefully weighed to judge whether it is reliable 1034:—having said that, it's unlikely that many non-Wikipedians are in the least bit aware of that, so effort should be made to ensure the new editor(s) do. 689:

it or not, there are rare diseases that are linked to drugs and vaccienes, such as Reye's Syndrome. I've asked others from WP:Comics to be involved.

241: 2771:

Actually the cause of his death has been added, there's a dispute about it being linked to the application of the flu shot. It's being discussed.

2467:, you'd feel comfortable rating that blog entry as a potential source, but as long as the article itself did not make that same conclusion, right? 2389:

Normally I'd agree with Nightscream, yet she's not just saying GBS was the cause of death — she's saying GBS from a vaccine was the cause of death.

3132: 3122: 3102: 283: 273: 105: 2433:

Only if it has been indicated to be plausible by the scientific community. If it hasn't been, then stating it as such as indeed fringe science.

423:

Mark Evanier doesn't appear to have acutally read the Knowledge article. If he had, he would have known that this sentence of his is incorrect:

504:

First off, you are actually incorrect in that there are some newspaper articles, even quoted in the source, saying he died of Prostate Cancer.

353: 3152: 3127: 2417: 109: 3002:

Please remove the category "People of Italian descent" since this is neither discuseed nor sourced in the article currently. Thank you, --

1967:

In other words, is there solely a problem referencing the entry for the purposes of confirming that he had GBS, and for no other reason?

2866: 2755: 1085: 113: 2868: 1087: 441:

cause of death is given. It is extremely irresponsible to make a statement as he did without checking what the article actually says.

2814:

of the "many published sources" that claim Plastino died of prostate cancer. Where are all these supposed articles? Because neither

249: 104:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 1311:

And since the only citation to any GBS claim is to Evanier, the reader would be going to the footnoted source with a misleading

482:

Additionally, while I'm sure the grieving family wants to assign a cause, claiming that a flu vaccine caused Guillain–Barré is

984: 705: 411: 100: 58: 1030:

Whatever's going on here, whether the claims added are fact or fiction, they cannot be added without citing what Knowledge

2392:

I don't think there's anything wrong with relating the portions of the claim in the cited source that are allowable under

1084:

I see no reason why the passage cannot state that sources that reported the cause of death as prostate cancer were wrong (

1184:

I don't think there's anything wrong with saying that GBS caused his death, as long as we omit the mention of a vaccine.

221: 176: 33: 2844:. I think MAP's statement is meant to say it was wrongly reported in many news outlets and not on Knowledge itself. 1455:

We can't POV pick and choose which part of a sentence to believe. Either the whole thing is credible or none of it is.

1118:

GBS has a low mortality rate, so people do die from the disease, since it can affect the Autotomous Nervous system.

2870: 1089: 850:. However if Mark Evanier's blog is consider reliable (I don't think I do) then a counter-point can be included per 615:

And by the way, the article states quite clearly that he had Guillain–Barré. Not a single person is denying that. --

2333: 2318: 2026: 1686: 829: 2258: 1778: 863: 360:

cover sourcing them, but, if there's no mention of birth/death dates in the article body, I always source them

245: 1315:

claim, as well Evanier's irrelevant and inaccurate claim that Knowledge says Plastino died of prostate cancer.

21: 2981: 2759: 2738: 2716: 393: 2307: 1039: 3084: 3015: 3007: 2924: 2885: 2571: 2453: 2292:

I was simply concerned about quoting a footnoted source next to the statement he had GBS. That's all.

2265: 2022: 1845: 1682: 1272: 1227: 1189: 1108: 826: 39: 1123: 327:

The previous editor's edit misattributed the source of the birthplace information, which came from the

1161:

Absent something definitive, like a report quoting his doctor or the death certificate, we don't know

893:. I think we could have worked through this if you had not be so confrontational with your comments. 2502: 2254: 1151: 972: 693: 399: 2897: 2845: 2772: 2627: 2540: 2468: 2362: 2293: 2213: 2080: 1968: 1849: 1635: 1402: 1127: 1103:, or merely leads to life-threatening complications, as the Lead section of the GBS article states. 1049: 976: 894: 846:

Agree with Tenebrae and DWB, there needs to be explicit verification from a reliable source free of

697: 519: 403: 2901: 2849: 2776: 2631: 2544: 2472: 2366: 2297: 2217: 2084: 1972: 1906:

Wow. Why are you so determined to include the cite Maryann Plastino wants even when we have actual

1853: 1783:

for the statement being made in the Knowledge article and is an appropriate source for that content

1639: 1406: 1370: 1212: 1131: 980: 898: 859: 701: 523: 444:

As to "many" published news sources stating his death was from prostate cancer: This article cites

407: 1142:

their beliefs that a vaccine caused Al Plastino's death but Knowledge is not the place for it per

3076: 3030: 2831: 2691: 2665: 2600: 2514: 2351: 2282: 2150: 1916: 1795: 1490: 1338: 1245: 1171: 1076:

it. HIV, for example, does not cause death. Rather, it compromises the immune system, which then

1056: 1013: 945: 920: 816: 750: 659: 620: 594: 491: 471: 446: 342: 2876:

prostate cancer, which is not the same thing. But in any event, what difference does it make if

2505:

as a favor the family. Trying to use Knowledge to help a family air its personal grievances and

138: 3058: 2954: 1143: 1035: 890: 646: 372: 3080: 3048: 3011: 3003: 2944: 2920: 2881: 2567: 2535: 2506: 2486: 2464: 2449: 2397: 2361:

as a source (Al Plastino RIP), as I stated above. With the note about Newsday I withdraw.

1312: 1268: 1223: 1185: 1104: 808: 483: 92: 2329: 2314: 1147: 2272:

gave him, which is the suggestion that the article was not "confirming that he had GBS"

964: 654:

claims the vaccine killed him. Only the family, which has something to gain. Shameful.--

3055:. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. — 2951:. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. — 1365: 1208: 1146:. What is stated on the death certificate? I rather doubt it mentions a vaccination. 855: 3096: 3026: 2827: 2687: 2661: 2596: 2531: 2510: 2498: 2393: 2347: 2343: 2278: 2146: 1912: 1791: 1486: 1334: 1241: 1167: 1053: 1009: 941: 916: 851: 847: 812: 746: 655: 616: 590: 487: 467: 452: 338: 333: 213: 2444:

actually contact him, and did say what Evanier has related that she said. But he is

791:

if you claim that anyone is erroneously giving prostate cancer as a cause of death.

3052: 2948: 2914:

Well, you did a bit more than merely point out what happened elsewhere; you edited

2492: 2440:

credible to the extent that we can conclude provisionally that Plastino's daughter

1774: 1095:

it is accepted among the scientific establishment that flu vaccines cause GBS, and

1031: 367: 2079:

Okay, I'll put the citation reference in, without changing the WP article itself.

854:, though these would have to framed as his personal opinion and not fact to avoid 515: 76: 52: 1263: 1119: 292: 207: 203: 82: 2840:

Well, a google news search shows many sources, including PBS, got it wrong.

2448:

credible to the extent that we can accept that claim in matters of science.

197: 170: 589:

cite here that says he died of prostate cancer. Because none of them do. --

891:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Guillain%E2%80%93Barr%C3%A9_syndrome#cite_note-14

2739:

http://www.newsfromme.com/2014/02/27/lets-correct-wikipedia-on-something/

394:

http://www.newsfromme.com/2014/02/27/lets-correct-wikipedia-on-something/

466:

of them give a cause of death, from prostate cancer or anything else..--

562:

doctor will help you decide whether the vaccine is recommended for you.

458: 2743:

In summary, Mark Evanier of www.newsfromme.com, states the following:

2686:

every point made on this talk page—just let JRT have the final word.

2306:

What is the proposal that warrants so much discussion? JRT performed

2268:'s contributions, but he appeared to be responding to a fallacy that 226: 2261:? How about the fact the reference contains a fringe-science claim? 1124:

http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/175/Supplement_1/S151.full.pdf

3088: 3063: 3034: 3019: 2959: 2928: 2905: 2889: 2853: 2835: 2780: 2763: 2695: 2669: 2635: 2604: 2575: 2548: 2518: 2476: 2457: 2370: 2355: 2301: 2286: 2221: 2154: 2088: 2030: 1976: 1920: 1857: 1799: 1690: 1643: 1494: 1410: 1375: 1342: 1276: 1249: 1231: 1216: 1193: 1175: 1155: 1135: 1112: 1058: 1043: 1017: 988: 949: 924: 902: 867: 840: 820: 754: 709: 663: 624: 598: 527: 495: 475: 415: 378: 346: 112:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 1911:

GBS. We don't need a comic-book blogger to say the same thing. --

2416:

Associated. Not caused by. This is extremely important, because

2865:

There are a few sources that say he died from prostate cancer (

1785:." Not using Evanier to support a medical claim has no bearing 915:. And tag teams traditionally have two people, not "dozens". -- 2969: 2704: 2410:"There is a small possibility that influenza vaccine could be 935:

Wow. Again, misrepresentation: The Knowledge article you cite

15: 2810:

I would ask the anon IP or MaryAnn Plastino Charles to cite

2332:, it was later reported by MaryAnn that he actually died of 291: 137: 2896:

correct misinformation that spread through the Internet.

225:, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to 3113:

Low-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles

2737:

Details of Al Plastino's death need to be corrected. See

1451:

just saying GBS was the cause of death — she's saying GBS

236:

If you would like to participate, you can help with the

3108:

Start-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles

2489:'s work, but this is a non-issue since the GBS passage 2381: 912: 2143:

we already have a real journalistic source saying it.

965:

http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/gbs/detail_gbs.htm

3047:According to the page's protection level and your 2943:According to the page's protection level and your 2660:"Censoring" what information exactly? Tell me. -- 2752:Please correct the entry on Knowledge. Thanks. 556:should be cautious about beign vaccinated. Read: 2872:), though the rest merely mention that he died 2800: 559: 426: 2807:Not a word of that says what caused his death. 3138:Start-Class Comics articles of Low-importance 2797:state a cause of death. Read it for yourself: 352:I don't know about "set guidelines", neither 8: 2501:JRT is attempting to shoehorn inappropriate 1120:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18443311 516:http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/qa/flushot.htm 19: 3118:Arts and entertainment work group articles 911:Redlink editors have made that edit since 548:say flu vaccines give you Guillain–Barré. 248:the attached article or discuss it at the 165: 47: 2424:been confirmed to any accepted degree. 2408:Actually, it does not say that. It says 2253:You don't see anything wrong? How about 1091:). But it needs to be clarified whether 2793:Once again, not true. The article does 2328:Erroneously reported to have died from 167: 49: 2966:Protected edit request on 1 March 2014 2701:Protected edit request on 1 March 2014 1453:from a vaccine was the cause of death. 1202:Suggestion on rewording personal life 1081:claim will not go into the article. 149:the arts and entertainment work group 7: 3143:Start-Class Comics creators articles 2418:correlation does not imply causation 2382:accidentally deleted my last message 219:This article is within the scope of 98:This article is within the scope of 3148:Comics creators work group articles 38:It is of interest to the following 3051:, you should currently be able to 2947:, you should currently be able to 645:Plastino's family and friends are 14: 2313:Plastino had been suffering from 652:No disinterested, unbiased source 3039: 2973: 2935: 2708: 650:lawsuit settlement is shameful. 206: 196: 169: 85: 75: 51: 20: 1222:I was thinking the same thing. 795:is supposedly saying this? Not 462:. Like this Knowledge article, 278:This article has been rated as 122:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 3133:Low-importance Comics articles 3123:WikiProject Biography articles 3103:Start-Class biography articles 1032:defines as a "reliable source" 125:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 2274:when the article in fact did. 1059:23:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 1044:21:59, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 1018:22:27, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 989:22:16, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 950:22:11, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 925:22:05, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 903:21:51, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 868:21:53, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 841:21:40, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 821:21:35, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 755:21:32, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 710:21:27, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 664:21:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 625:21:10, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 599:20:23, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 528:20:02, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 496:17:55, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 476:17:39, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 416:12:16, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 379:08:02, 28 November 2013 (UTC) 347:05:27, 28 November 2013 (UTC) 300:This article is supported by 146:This article is supported by 3089:17:05, 2 November 2021 (UTC) 3010:) 21:10, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 2141:No, because as I say above, 742:other than the family itself 258:Knowledge:WikiProject Comics 110:contribute to the discussion 3153:WikiProject Comics articles 3128:Start-Class Comics articles 2996:to reactivate your request. 2984:has been answered. Set the 2731:to reactivate your request. 2719:has been answered. Set the 2414:Guillain-Barré syndrome..." 572:that the vaccine caused it. 544:what it says. The CDC does 385:Error in the cause of death 261:Template:WikiProject Comics 3169: 1048:Exactly. And I might note 940:"confrontational" tone? -- 554:who have had Guillan Barre 303:Comics creators work group 284:project's importance scale 3064:22:07, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 3035:16:35, 2 March 2014 (UTC) 3020:21:10, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 2960:22:06, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 2929:17:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 2906:12:39, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 2890:08:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 2854:02:26, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 2836:00:57, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 2781:00:49, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 2764:00:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 2696:21:44, 9 March 2014 (UTC) 2670:17:47, 9 March 2014 (UTC) 2636:17:39, 9 March 2014 (UTC) 2605:16:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC) 2576:16:01, 9 March 2014 (UTC) 2549:15:49, 9 March 2014 (UTC) 2519:15:01, 9 March 2014 (UTC) 2477:13:46, 9 March 2014 (UTC) 2458:23:30, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 2371:02:31, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 2356:02:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 2302:00:17, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 2287:23:55, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 2222:23:41, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 2155:23:30, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 2089:23:27, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 2031:23:25, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 1977:23:22, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 1921:23:28, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 1858:23:19, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 1800:23:04, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 1691:22:12, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 1644:21:11, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 1495:15:58, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 1411:14:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 1376:19:25, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 1343:17:38, 4 March 2014 (UTC) 1277:16:39, 4 March 2014 (UTC) 1250:15:59, 2 March 2014 (UTC) 1232:16:58, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 1217:12:19, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 1194:16:39, 4 March 2014 (UTC) 1176:15:57, 2 March 2014 (UTC) 1156:02:23, 2 March 2014 (UTC) 1136:18:44, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 1113:08:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 299: 277: 191: 145: 70: 46: 2874:following a battle with 2509:is completely wrong. -- 2334:Guillain-Barré syndrome 2319:Guillain-Barré syndrome 552:it says is that people 3053:edit the page yourself 2949:edit the page yourself 2804: 2380:Tenebrae, I think you 789:you have to give cites 564: 430: 296: 142: 64:Arts and Entertainment 28:This article is rated 2495:journalistic citation 2463:So just so I'm clear 1441:Under one per million 295: 141: 101:WikiProject Biography 3070:World War II service 2826:say such a thing. -- 2507:fringe science claim 1732:91-year-old died of. 1447:. And again: She's 787:On a second issue, 585:And please show me 250:project's talk page 2816:The New York Times 797:The New York Times 447:The New York Times 297: 222:WikiProject Comics 143: 128:biography articles 34:content assessment 3000: 2999: 2735: 2734: 2259:WP:CONTEXTMATTERS 1779:WP:CONTEXTMATTERS 992: 975:comment added by 713: 696:comment added by 419: 402:comment added by 318: 317: 314: 313: 310: 309: 164: 163: 160: 159: 3160: 3062: 3043: 3042: 2991: 2987: 2977: 2976: 2970: 2958: 2939: 2938: 2726: 2722: 2712: 2711: 2705: 2266:Richard Keatinge 2023:Richard Keatinge 1846:Richard Keatinge 1683:Richard Keatinge 1373: 1368: 1240:Works for me. -- 991: 969: 712: 690: 418: 396: 375: 370: 266: 265: 262: 259: 256: 216: 211: 210: 200: 193: 192: 187: 184: 173: 166: 130: 129: 126: 123: 120: 106:join the project 95: 93:Biography portal 90: 89: 88: 79: 72: 71: 66: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 3168: 3167: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3093: 3092: 3072: 3056: 3040: 2989: 2985: 2974: 2968: 2952: 2936: 2724: 2720: 2709: 2703: 2493:reliable-source 2412:associated with 2330:prostate cancer 2315:prostate cancer 2310:which changed: 1371: 1366: 1262:Per the second 1204: 1066:uncontroversial 970: 691: 433:Knowledge does 397: 387: 373: 368: 325: 264:Comics articles 263: 260: 257: 254: 253: 212: 205: 185: 179: 127: 124: 121: 118: 117: 91: 86: 84: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 3166: 3164: 3156: 3155: 3150: 3145: 3140: 3135: 3130: 3125: 3120: 3115: 3110: 3105: 3095: 3094: 3071: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3037: 2998: 2997: 2978: 2967: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2909: 2908: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2808: 2805: 2798: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2733: 2732: 2713: 2702: 2699: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2491:already has a 2485:I'm a fan of 2480: 2479: 2432: 2407: 2391: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1235: 1234: 1203: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1179: 1178: 1139: 1138: 1062: 1061: 1046: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 955: 954: 953: 952: 930: 929: 928: 927: 906: 905: 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 879: 878: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 860:TriiipleThreat 844: 823: 770: 769: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 675: 674: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 634: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 573: 565: 557: 533: 532: 531: 530: 508: 507: 506: 505: 499: 498: 484:fringe science 479: 478: 442: 431: 424: 386: 383: 382: 381: 324: 321: 316: 315: 312: 311: 308: 307: 298: 288: 287: 280:Low-importance 276: 270: 269: 267: 229:on Knowledge. 218: 217: 201: 189: 188: 186:Low‑importance 174: 162: 161: 158: 157: 154:Low-importance 144: 134: 133: 131: 97: 96: 80: 68: 67: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3165: 3154: 3151: 3149: 3146: 3144: 3141: 3139: 3136: 3134: 3131: 3129: 3126: 3124: 3121: 3119: 3116: 3114: 3111: 3109: 3106: 3104: 3101: 3100: 3098: 3091: 3090: 3086: 3082: 3078: 3069: 3065: 3060: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3038: 3036: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3017: 3013: 3009: 3005: 2995: 2992:parameter to 2983: 2979: 2972: 2971: 2965: 2961: 2956: 2950: 2946: 2942: 2934: 2930: 2926: 2922: 2917: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2907: 2903: 2899: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2869: 2867: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2820:New York Post 2817: 2813: 2809: 2806: 2803: 2799: 2796: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2782: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2756:198.134.52.72 2753: 2750: 2747: 2744: 2741: 2740: 2730: 2727:parameter to 2718: 2714: 2707: 2706: 2700: 2698: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2550: 2546: 2542: 2537: 2533: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2503:WP:OVERCITING 2500: 2496: 2494: 2488: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2478: 2474: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2434: 2431: 2425: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2413: 2406: 2401: 2399: 2395: 2390: 2385: 2383: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2340: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2326: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2311: 2309: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2262: 2260: 2256: 2255:WP:OVERCITING 2223: 2219: 2215: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1909: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1564: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1377: 1374: 1369: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1314: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1265: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1201: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1164: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1099:GBS is fatal 1098: 1094: 1090: 1088: 1086: 1082: 1079: 1075: 1069: 1067: 1060: 1057: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1028: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 990: 986: 982: 978: 974: 966: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 951: 947: 943: 938: 934: 933: 932: 931: 926: 922: 918: 914: 910: 909: 908: 907: 904: 900: 896: 892: 887: 886: 869: 865: 861: 857: 853: 849: 845: 843: 842: 838: 837: 832:/ Comment on 831: 828: 824: 822: 818: 814: 810: 806: 802: 801:New York Post 798: 794: 790: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772: 771: 756: 752: 748: 743: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 726: 711: 707: 703: 699: 695: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 680: 679: 678: 677: 676: 665: 661: 657: 653: 648: 644: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 626: 622: 618: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 600: 596: 592: 588: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 571: 566: 563: 558: 555: 551: 547: 543: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 529: 525: 521: 517: 512: 511: 510: 509: 503: 502: 501: 500: 497: 493: 489: 485: 481: 480: 477: 473: 469: 465: 461: 460: 455: 454: 453:New York Post 449: 448: 443: 440: 436: 432: 429: 425: 422: 421: 420: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 395: 391: 384: 380: 377: 376: 371: 363: 359: 355: 351: 350: 349: 348: 344: 340: 335: 330: 323:Edit just now 322: 320: 305: 304: 294: 290: 289: 285: 281: 275: 272: 271: 268: 251: 247: 243: 239: 238:current tasks 235: 233: 228: 224: 223: 215: 214:Comics portal 209: 204: 202: 199: 195: 194: 190: 183: 178: 175: 172: 168: 155: 152:(assessed as 151: 150: 140: 136: 135: 132: 115: 114:documentation 111: 107: 103: 102: 94: 83: 81: 78: 74: 73: 69: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 3073: 3059:Technical 13 3044: 3001: 2993: 2982:edit request 2955:Technical 13 2940: 2915: 2877: 2873: 2864: 2823: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2801: 2794: 2754: 2751: 2748: 2745: 2742: 2736: 2728: 2717:edit request 2684: 2490: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2435: 2428: 2426: 2421: 2411: 2409: 2404: 2402: 2388: 2386: 2379: 2273: 2269: 2263: 2257:? How about 2252: 2142: 1907: 1786: 1782: 1777:works. Read 1562: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1205: 1162: 1140: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1083: 1077: 1073: 1070: 1065: 1063: 1036:Curly Turkey 971:— Preceding 936: 835: 833: 804: 800: 796: 792: 788: 741: 692:— Preceding 651: 586: 569: 560: 553: 549: 545: 541: 540:Wow. That's 463: 457: 451: 445: 438: 434: 427: 398:— Preceding 392: 388: 366: 361: 328: 326: 319: 301: 279: 242:notice board 240:, visit the 232:Get involved 230: 220: 147: 99: 40:WikiProjects 3081:FieldMarine 3049:user rights 3012:Malerooster 3004:Malerooster 2945:user rights 2921:Nightscream 2882:Nightscream 2568:Nightscream 2536:Nightscream 2487:Nightscream 2465:Nightscream 2450:Nightscream 2403:Jinkinson: 1269:Nightscream 1224:Nightscream 1186:Nightscream 1105:Nightscream 839:'s FA nom! 647:tag-teaming 30:Start-class 3097:Categories 2986:|answered= 2721:|answered= 2387:Tenebrae: 2264:I respect 1787:whatsoever 1563:regardless 1372:talk to me 1148:Mtminchi08 1144:WP:SOAPBOX 836:Dishonored 437:say that. 3045:Not done: 2941:Not done: 2398:WP:FRINGE 2308:this edit 1908:newspaper 1367:Jinkinson 1313:WP:FRINGE 1209:Nil Einne 1101:in itself 1050:JohnRTroy 977:JohnRTroy 913:yesterday 848:synthesis 809:WP:VERIFY 698:JohnRTroy 404:JohnRTroy 119:Biography 59:Biography 3077:defining 3027:Tenebrae 2828:Tenebrae 2688:Johnuniq 2662:Tenebrae 2597:Tenebrae 2532:Tenebrae 2511:Tenebrae 2436:Evanier 2430:science. 2348:Johnuniq 2279:Tenebrae 2147:Tenebrae 1913:Tenebrae 1792:Tenebrae 1487:Tenebrae 1335:Tenebrae 1264:NIH link 1242:Tenebrae 1168:Tenebrae 1010:Tenebrae 985:contribs 973:unsigned 942:Tenebrae 937:does not 917:Tenebrae 813:Tenebrae 747:Tenebrae 706:contribs 694:unsigned 656:Tenebrae 617:Tenebrae 591:Tenebrae 488:Tenebrae 468:Tenebrae 412:contribs 400:unsigned 339:Tenebrae 182:Creators 2824:Newsday 1445:no risk 856:WP:PSCI 805:Newsday 459:Newsday 329:Newsday 282:on the 2818:, the 2497:. The 2394:WP:IRS 2344:WP:DUE 1485:for.-- 1074:causes 1040:gobble 852:WP:DUE 830:(talk) 799:, the 450:, the 358:MOSNUM 354:MOSBIO 334:WP:MOS 255:Comics 227:comics 177:Comics 36:scale. 2990:|ans= 2980:This 2878:other 2725:|ans= 2715:This 2427:JRT: 1775:WP:RS 1078:leads 374:pedia 369:Wylie 362:after 3085:talk 3057:{{U| 3031:talk 3016:talk 3008:talk 2953:{{U| 2925:talk 2916:this 2902:talk 2886:talk 2850:talk 2832:talk 2822:nor 2777:talk 2760:talk 2692:talk 2666:talk 2632:talk 2601:talk 2572:talk 2545:talk 2515:talk 2473:talk 2454:talk 2396:and 2367:talk 2352:talk 2317:and 2298:talk 2283:talk 2218:talk 2151:talk 2085:talk 2027:talk 1973:talk 1917:talk 1854:talk 1844:So, 1796:talk 1687:talk 1640:talk 1491:talk 1407:talk 1339:talk 1273:talk 1246:talk 1228:talk 1213:talk 1190:talk 1172:talk 1163:what 1152:talk 1132:talk 1109:talk 1014:talk 981:talk 946:talk 921:talk 899:talk 864:talk 817:talk 811:. -- 751:talk 702:talk 660:talk 621:talk 595:talk 524:talk 492:talk 472:talk 464:none 456:and 408:talk 356:nor 343:talk 246:edit 108:and 2988:or 2898:JRT 2846:JRT 2812:any 2795:not 2773:JRT 2723:or 2628:JRT 2541:JRT 2499:SPA 2469:JRT 2446:not 2442:did 2422:not 2384:. 2363:JRT 2325:to 2294:JRT 2270:you 2214:JRT 2081:JRT 1969:JRT 1850:JRT 1636:JRT 1449:not 1443:or 1403:JRT 1294:is. 1128:JRT 1054:DES 895:JRT 858:.-- 827:DWB 803:or 793:Who 587:any 570:not 550:All 546:not 542:not 520:JRT 518:. 435:not 274:Low 3099:: 3087:) 3061:}} 3033:) 3018:) 2994:no 2957:}} 2927:) 2904:) 2888:) 2852:) 2834:) 2779:) 2762:) 2729:no 2694:) 2668:) 2634:) 2603:) 2574:) 2547:) 2517:) 2475:) 2456:) 2438:is 2369:) 2354:) 2300:) 2285:) 2277:-- 2220:) 2153:) 2145:-- 2087:) 2029:) 1975:) 1919:) 1856:) 1798:) 1790:-- 1689:) 1642:) 1493:) 1409:) 1341:) 1333:-- 1275:) 1248:) 1230:) 1215:) 1192:) 1174:) 1154:) 1134:) 1122:, 1111:) 1097:B. 1093:A. 1042:) 1016:) 1008:-- 987:) 983:• 948:) 923:) 901:) 866:) 819:) 753:) 745:-- 708:) 704:• 662:) 623:) 597:) 526:) 494:) 474:) 439:No 414:) 410:• 345:) 337:-- 244:, 180:: 156:). 62:: 3083:( 3029:( 3014:( 3006:( 2923:( 2900:( 2884:( 2848:( 2830:( 2775:( 2758:( 2690:( 2664:( 2630:( 2599:( 2570:( 2543:( 2513:( 2471:( 2452:( 2365:( 2350:( 2336:. 2296:( 2281:( 2216:( 2149:( 2083:( 2025:( 1971:( 1915:( 1852:( 1794:( 1685:( 1638:( 1489:( 1405:( 1337:( 1271:( 1244:( 1226:( 1211:( 1188:( 1170:( 1150:( 1130:( 1107:( 1038:( 1012:( 979:( 944:( 919:( 897:( 862:( 815:( 749:( 700:( 658:( 619:( 593:( 522:( 490:( 470:( 406:( 341:( 306:. 286:. 252:. 234:! 116:. 42::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index