142:
686:'s discography because it's the latter's non-notable project so I don't see how that logic wouldn't apply here and why you would argue against removing Walkzz's work when both works are equally non-notable. A remix is an official release by the original artist or sometimes by the remixer with permission (there is no such thing as officially self-published remixes), a bootleg is an unofficial recording published by the remixer but unapproved by the original
163:
249:
231:
74:
259:
53:
22:
516:, per my points in the discussion below that the section consists of unreleased remixes by Walker. Unreleased because they were merely uploaded to his YouTube channel with no proper distribution and they aren't even remixes because a remix is a piece of music made with permission from the original artist but there isn't any evidence to prove the listed remixes are made in that manner.
544:, and I'm surprised to see that this is controversial. It seems obvious to me that just because an artist is notable, every single thing they self-release on social media sites, video hosting sites, soundcloud, etc. would be listed on Knowledge (XXG). Is there really no style guide that already addresses this? —
718:
According to who? What you're saying is if Walker uploads a song to SoundCloud it's "unofficially released" as well, which makes no sense. Anything released by the artist himself is official, it doesn't have to be released under a label or made available for purchase and streaming. You don't need to
641:
A remix is released or given permission for release by the original artist or their label not the remixer. These self-published remixes by Walker are very likely bootlegs because they were made using his bedroom alias "DJ Walkzz" years before achieving mainstream success. No reliable sources exist
856:
Sure they are. Distribution includes digital consumption. It is impossible for recorded music to actually get into the hands of consumers aside from CD and vinyls and such so iterally what you're saying is every song in history that wasn't released on CD and was only available for streaming and
583:
Not an easy choice, but my two cents on this: If a "remix" (sometimes the artist might call it a bootleg) is published by a specific artist in mind, albeit released through a label or self-published on
Youtube, it should be treated as an official remix. Of course, obvious bootlegs of unreleased
802:
states that officially-released "bootlegs", as you like to call it, can be included, and the "official" here refers to the primary artist, not the remix artist, so I don't even know what you're arguing about. For example, Walker's remix of "Hymn for the
Weekend" shouldn't appear on Coldplay's
723:
No. Again, this is an opinion not a fact. I can remix somebody's song and put it on SoundCloud and call it a remix, you don't need permission from the original artist or label. Yes, they are not official remixes, but they are still remixes, and are released by Walker himself. Remixes are not
797:
mediums of distribution. These remixes do not necessarily have to be made available for purchase on digital retailers for God's sake. Even the opinion piece you cited mentioned "official" and "unofficial" remixes, implying that both are remixes. Note that
719:
dig through my comments and find flaws to back up your argument. When I said he isn't notable under Dotcom, I was saying that I'm against the idea of making a separate page and discography for Dotcom, I didn't really read what he wrote at the end.
857:
digital download doesn't count as an official release. Stop citing these random articles as if they must be right, you're just using them because they fit your argument. I'm tired of this back and forth just go for a RfC.
673:
Self-published music is unofficially released unless made available with distribution. The remixes listed here are not made available anywhere but on YouTube. DJ Walkzz is a non-notable alias of Walker and you once
659:, according to Knowledge (XXG)'s own definition, is a recording that was not officially released by the artist. These remixes are indeed released by Walker himself. Also don't use my username as the headline.
942:
565:
The remixes in question are officially released by Walker via his YouTube channel and/or SoundCloud. Music distribution includes digital consumption, and is not limited to physical copies.
356:, which I would arguably describe as a more reliable source then the YouTube ref provided earlier by that IP. Other media outlets too state that Walker is featured in the track, as shown
357:
651:
You are talking about official remixes, which are remixes officially released by the original artist or their label. These are self-published remixes. No contradiction here.
932:
114:
653:
These self-published remixes by Walker are very likely bootlegs because they were made using his bedroom alias 'DJ Walkzz' years before achieving mainstream success.
937:
90:
927:
952:
183:
569:
states that bootlegs officially released by the artist can be added, there is no mention that the remixer must seek permission from the original artist.
767:
761:
124:
81:
58:
655:
Pure assumption, and their being released under DJ Walkzz doesn't change anything. They are all sourced from Walker's official YouTube channel. A
897:
Not sure how to add this correctly sourced, but a new video came out 18 December for "Space Melody" which is stated to be official by Walker.
765:
Most remixes you have heard, downloaded, or made are bootlegs—that is, using audio layers of any song without express approval from the artist.
179:
170:
147:
947:
207:
962:
843:
780:
702:
528:
489:
281:
957:
383:. All sources are saying that Alan Walker is featured Ignite expect YouTube. We should wait until for the reliable source. Thank you,
353:
831:
distribute music to consumers by definition. Distribution in this context is referring to the business term and not generically.
833:
770:
692:
518:
479:
272:
236:
33:
472:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
888:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
910:
395:
799:
566:
39:
428:
675:
649:
A remix is released or given permission for release by the original artist or their label not the remixer.
614:
No, as it is valid content as YouTube and SoundCloud count as major release platforms these days, regards
619:
340:
280:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
89:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
822:
759:
The important characteristic (of a remix) is that the remixer was asked or authorized to do the remix.
453:
384:
546:
721:
A remix is an official release by the original artist or sometimes by the remixer with permission.
643:
862:
812:
729:
664:
574:
656:
821:
No, they're not. Distribution is the way that recorded music gets into the hands of consumers
213:
615:
432:
332:
327:
326:
So it's expected that a different source be cited that displays the title change? Alrighty.
162:
141:
86:
804:
604:
446:
368:
825:
589:
716:
Self-published music is unofficially released unless made available with distribution.
593:
921:
906:
858:
808:
742:
725:
660:
636:
570:
321:
264:
913:
866:
851:
816:
788:
733:
710:
668:
623:
609:
588:
which were revamped and released by fans shouldn't be accepted. But something like
578:
553:
536:
497:
460:
404:
373:
346:
803:
discography, but it can be added on Walker's own discography. Go for your beloved
431:
section from the article. A slight majority of editors believe that Alan Walker's
745:: "In the music industry, a release usually is a creative output from an artist,
182:. Any questions pertaining to discography-related articles should be directed to
679:
175:
898:
683:
597:
585:
436:
361:
254:
824:. Consumers, as in, people who purchase goods and services for personal use.
690:
and per the
Knowledge (XXG) definition, these remixes qualify as bootlegs.
248:
230:
73:
52:
352:
Funny thing is, iTunes states that Alan Walker is a featuring artist over
902:
440:
443:, are considered official release platforms for music distribution. —
277:
174:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s collection of
751:
If Walker uploads a song to SoundCloud it's "unofficially released"
477:
Should the "Published remixes" section in the article be removed?
178:
articles and lists. If you would like to participate please visit
596:
and valided through
Youtube links should generally be accepted.
216:
in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
212:
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
15:
380:
642:
for them, hence they are not appropriate for inclusion.
827:
YouTube and SoundCloud are streaming platforms that
276:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
85:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
943:C-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
435:on music and video sharing platforms, including
8:
99:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Electronic music
899:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXzestWGq2U
225:
136:
47:
21:
19:
360:. The source might be unreliable though.
192:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Discographies
933:Mid-importance electronic music articles
168:This article is within the scope of the
757:- no it's not just my opinion. Remix -
227:
138:
49:
764:
758:
754:
750:
738:
720:
715:
652:
648:
938:WikiProject Electronic music articles
807:if you still think this is disputed.
102:Template:WikiProject Electronic music
7:
928:List-Class electronic music articles
755:Again, this is an opinion not a fact
592:who's released through the artist's
468:The following discussion is closed.
270:This article is within the scope of
79:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
953:WikiProject Discographies articles
747:available for sale or distribution
290:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Norway
214:project-independent quality rating
195:Template:WikiProject Discographies
14:
884:The discussion above is closed.
257:
247:
229:
161:
140:
72:
51:
20:
119:This article has been rated as
867:18:03, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
852:17:53, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
817:17:35, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
789:16:32, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
734:14:28, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
711:13:35, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
678:against including the work of
669:12:34, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
610:15:37, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
579:18:28, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
537:18:08, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
498:18:08, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
1:
914:12:40, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
284:and see a list of open tasks.
93:and see a list of open tasks.
948:C-Class Discography articles
554:02:40, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
461:23:50, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
82:WikiProject Electronic music
963:WikiProject Norway articles
624:17:43, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
293:Template:WikiProject Norway
979:
958:List-Class Norway articles
125:project's importance scale
242:
211:
171:Discographies WikiProject
156:
118:
105:electronic music articles
67:
46:
886:Please do not modify it.
470:Please do not modify it.
423:There is weak consensus
405:14:21, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
374:05:54, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
347:19:07, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
793:YouTube and SoundCloud
184:the project's talk page
893:New vid "Space Melody"
584:remixes/songs such as
28:This article is rated
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
198:Discography articles
429:"Published remixes"
471:
273:WikiProject Norway
34:content assessment
841:
778:
739:According to who?
700:
657:bootleg recording
526:
487:
469:
458:
433:verified accounts
400:
315:Song title change
312:
311:
308:
307:
304:
303:
224:
223:
220:
219:
135:
134:
131:
130:
970:
839:
776:
753:- exactly that.
698:
640:
607:
602:
551:
549:
524:
485:
456:
452:
449:
402:
398:
393:
371:
366:
325:
298:
297:
294:
291:
288:
267:
262:
261:
260:
251:
244:
243:
233:
226:
200:
199:
196:
193:
190:
180:the project page
165:
158:
157:
152:
144:
137:
107:
106:
103:
100:
97:
96:Electronic music
87:Electronic music
76:
69:
68:
63:
59:Electronic music
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
23:
16:
978:
977:
973:
972:
971:
969:
968:
967:
918:
917:
895:
890:
889:
634:
632:
605:
598:
562:
547:
545:
510:
505:
474:
465:
464:
463:
454:
447:
420:
415:
396:
385:
369:
362:
319:
317:
296:Norway articles
295:
292:
289:
286:
285:
263:
258:
256:
197:
194:
191:
188:
187:
150:
104:
101:
98:
95:
94:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
976:
974:
966:
965:
960:
955:
950:
945:
940:
935:
930:
920:
919:
894:
891:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
800:WP:DISCOGSTYLE
631:
628:
627:
626:
612:
581:
567:WP:DISCOGSTYLE
561:
558:
557:
556:
548:Rhododendrites
539:
509:
506:
504:
501:
475:
466:
422:
421:
418:
417:
416:
414:
411:
409:
399:<Talk/: -->
377:
376:
316:
313:
310:
309:
306:
305:
302:
301:
299:
282:the discussion
269:
268:
252:
240:
239:
234:
222:
221:
218:
217:
210:
204:
203:
201:
166:
154:
153:
145:
133:
132:
129:
128:
121:Mid-importance
117:
111:
110:
108:
91:the discussion
77:
65:
64:
62:Mid‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
975:
964:
961:
959:
956:
954:
951:
949:
946:
944:
941:
939:
936:
934:
931:
929:
926:
925:
923:
916:
915:
912:
908:
904:
900:
892:
887:
868:
864:
860:
855:
854:
853:
850:
849:
848:
847:
842:
837:
836:
830:
826:
823:
820:
819:
818:
814:
810:
806:
801:
796:
792:
791:
790:
787:
786:
785:
784:
779:
774:
773:
768:
766:
762:
760:
756:
752:
748:
744:
743:Music release
740:
737:
736:
735:
731:
727:
722:
717:
714:
713:
712:
709:
708:
707:
706:
701:
696:
695:
689:
685:
681:
677:
672:
671:
670:
666:
662:
658:
654:
650:
647:
646:
645:
644:
638:
629:
625:
621:
617:
613:
611:
608:
603:
601:
595:
591:
587:
582:
580:
576:
572:
568:
564:
563:
559:
555:
550:
543:
540:
538:
535:
534:
533:
532:
527:
522:
521:
515:
512:
511:
507:
502:
500:
499:
496:
495:
494:
493:
488:
483:
482:
473:
462:
459:
457:
451:
450:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
425:not to remove
412:
410:
407:
406:
403:
401:
394:
392:
388:
382:
375:
372:
367:
365:
359:
355:
351:
350:
349:
348:
344:
343:
342:
336:
335:
334:
329:
323:
314:
300:
283:
279:
275:
274:
266:
265:Norway portal
255:
253:
250:
246:
245:
241:
238:
235:
232:
228:
215:
209:
206:
205:
202:
189:Discographies
185:
181:
177:
173:
172:
167:
164:
160:
159:
155:
149:
148:Discographies
146:
143:
139:
126:
122:
116:
113:
112:
109:
92:
88:
84:
83:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
18:
17:
896:
885:
845:
844:
838:
834:
832:
828:
794:
782:
781:
775:
771:
769:
746:
704:
703:
697:
693:
691:
687:
633:
599:
541:
530:
529:
523:
519:
517:
513:
491:
490:
484:
480:
478:
476:
467:
445:
444:
424:
408:
397:
390:
386:
378:
363:
339:
338:
331:
330:
328:Hill Crest's
318:
271:
169:
120:
80:
40:WikiProjects
680:Dotcom (DJ)
616:Atlantic306
389:iddiqsazzad
176:discography
922:Categories
840:with them
777:with them
763:Bootleg -
724:bootlegs.
699:with them
684:Marshmello
630:Discussion
594:Soundcloud
525:with them
486:with them
448:Newslinger
437:SoundCloud
333:WikiLaser!
30:List-class
606:(discuss)
370:(discuss)
859:Hayman30
846:hundreds
835:Flooded
809:Hayman30
783:hundreds
772:Flooded
726:Hayman30
705:hundreds
694:Flooded
661:Hayman30
637:Hayman30
571:Hayman30
531:hundreds
520:Flooded
492:hundreds
481:Flooded
322:Hayman30
441:YouTube
151:C‑class
123:on the
829:do not
688:artist
676:argued
503:Survey
287:Norway
278:Norway
237:Norway
36:scale.
600:aNode
364:aNode
341:BOOM!
863:talk
813:talk
730:talk
665:talk
620:talk
590:this
586:this
575:talk
455:talk
439:and
427:the
381:this
379:See
358:here
354:here
903:Lar
805:RfC
795:are
749:".
682:in
552:\\
542:Yes
514:Yes
508:Yes
413:RFC
391:001
345:)
115:Mid
924::
905::
901:++
865:)
815:)
741:-
732:)
667:)
622:)
577:)
560:No
419:NO
911:c
909:/
907:t
861:(
811:(
728:(
663:(
639::
635:@
618:(
573:(
387:S
337:(
324::
320:@
208:C
186:.
127:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
