988:
he was living and working in London at the time. Was he just coincidentally visiting his parents at the time? Did his father still regard him as resident at home and merely living in 'digs' in London? Or was he out of work and living back at home in 1901? It's not our place to do research, of course, but it offers the possibility that someone will have done that research and if so, that might shed more light on Albert's relationship with his father, or on the success of his career in his mid-twenties. The simpler issue is that we have his exact address for his early life, and I can see no reason why that should not be included in his biography. It is no less important than the maiden name of his mother or the number of siblings, neither of which are particularly relevant to an understanding of a subject's work, but nevertheless are routinely included in biographies when those facts are known. Now, you explain why you are opposed to including information that is commonly found in other biographies, including featured articles of composers. --
1036:" are perfectly encyclopedic statements. The fact that he was born at 41 Alma Street and his family was living at 168 Antrobus Road in 1901 are neither no more nor no less encyclopedic or lacking in context than the fact that he was born in Birmingham, or the fact that he was born in August, or the fact that his father's name was George Henry. But we still routinely include these facts because we are not arrogant enough to suggest that we know best what facts the readers should be able to see. Your argument that all facts have to meet your standard of helping understanding is clearly meritless. This is an encyclopedia and sometimes we just need to present facts. --
1124:
behind claims of 'no consensus' to force your personal preferences onto articles against rational argument. Such is the case here. You don't own this article, much as you'd like to think otherwise, and your blustering and edit-warring needs to stop now. Review other composer articles that contain the same level of detail (such as the street address) and accept that you're wrong here. I'd rather move forward with some degree of concord, rather than having to see you sanctioned again because you can't accept that other editors' opinions are worth the same as yours. --
411:
390:
21:
177:
132:
358:
54:
296:
272:
226:
208:
1799:
1094:. Unless you can justify your opinion, which is the result of your own inflexible mindset, not mine, I will seek sanctions against you if you again choose to disrupt normal editing at this article. Believe me, I'd much rather not, but I will not allow you to dictate content purely on the basis of what you like or dislike. --
306:
941:
would find it intriguing that Albert was seemingly working in London, but still appeared on his parents' census return, sufficiently so to make the inclusion of that information worthwhile. All I've heard from you so far is "IDON'TLIKEIT" and I'm not prepared to accept your bluster in place of good reasoning. --
903:"waffling bloated rubbish". in addition, you clearly have no idea what original research means. He was registered in the 1901 census as living at the same address as his parents and siblings, and that is a fact. Stating that in the article is cannot possibly be OR, even by your distorted perspective. --
1770:
The article says: "In a
Monastery Garden (1915), sold over a million copies..." I think I understand this correctly: it means that more than a million copies were printed and sold, in an era in which most homes had a piano, and this was a piece that any budding pianist could play quite easily. But I
1576:
article. Not really useful, I thought, though fairly innocuous. If Andy or anyone else likes to create an article on the
Wireless Orchestra it would perhaps be another matter; I might have had a go myself, but the Wireless Orchestra isn't really a notable subject. I know from my reading for the BBCSO
1366:
It's really not worth the hassle: there were more citation needed tags than sources used. I think the overly finicky idea of trying to cause problems just ce cause of a change to the style of TWO references is questionable, to be honest. It makes me wonder why we bother trying to improve things to be
1089:
It is clear that very similar information is included in other comparable articles, some of which are FAs. That makes it clear that your opinion is not conformant with regular practice on
Knowledge. That is my justification and your removal of sourced information along with this refusal to debate the
1197:
attempt to change an article's established citation style merely on the grounds of personal preference, to make it match other articles, or without first seeking consensus for the change. As with spelling differences, it is normal practice to defer to the style used by the first major contributor or
987:
Well, if you finally want to engage in a debate about the actual issues, I'll happily oblige. Not only does the census information give us the address where the Ketèlbey family lived, but it raises the question of why Albert was still registered at his parents' home in 1901, while as far as we know
786:
It really is most unhelpful - and happily rare in my experience - to have substantial changes to an article while it is being peer reviewed. It is not very fair to those who are kind enough to peer review if they find the text is suddenly unstable. Constructive comments at PR would be most welcome,
755:
is "crap", but rather a perfectly encyclopedic detail showing that Ketèlbey was registered as still resident with his parents in his mid-twenties, despite also living in a house in Bruton Street, London. That may, of course, have been symptomatic of how his father viewed his career at the time, and
685:
We are not in a position to dictate to readers how much detail they may wish to have about this subject. It is quite common for biographies to include detail such as the address where the subject lived, particularly when the address still exists. After all, if not for that curiosity, we would never
1108:
Disruptive? Utter balls. There is no consensus to include the census information so YOU need to seek and get the consensus to add dross to the article. There is none yet. Go ahead and try and get sanctions if you wish to: your passive-aggressive stance and threats here and on talk pages is rapidly
940:
which requires the "Place of abode". It would take research to determine whether Albert was actually resident with his parents in 1901 or merely visiting, and you'll note that it was precisely the existence of such further research that I was speculating on. I'll repeat that I believe many readers
902:
Absolute nonsense. You don't define standards and trying to claim special privilege for your own personal preferences is inimical to collegial editing. Removal of well-sourced, relevant content is disruptive editing and you need to be looking for consensus, not calling other editors' contributions
887:
No-one has strayed from Wiki norms or policies, despite you insinuation to the contrary. We have standards that the addition failed to live up to and it was removed. It's a poor addition that if left in during PR or FAC would be commented on negatively by anyone adhering to high standards. That is
1749:
Part of the misunderstanding is that his surname is unusual/ rare and added to that his affectation in adding the inflection caused more confusion as to whether it was genuine. He did use pseudonyms as well. On this point I added to a footnote - not the main text - the fact that there is a small
1123:
Neither I nor anyone else needs consensus (which you take to be your permission) to added properly sourced, relevant content to an article. What you call "dross" is the kind of encyclopedic information we find in other comparable articles and belongs in this article. You have far too often hidden
598:
When you created a stub on a musician, it was your call which I couldn't change, not by any expansion, - per arbcom decision. That should go both ways, no? I am not in the mood for ibox discussions, getting ready for holidays. Support this infobox, regardless of who created the article,unless you
502:
The original author of this article is a supporter of infoboxes and therefore this article should have one. The infobox makes the article look much better as it balances the lead section, and occupying the whitespace at the top right with both image and text creates a much more pleasant aesthetic
1246:
If Rex wants to change all the citations to a template style I should have no objections. I know my co-editor prefers templates, and used the non-template style out of kindness to me, as I am not very adept. But we really must be consistent throughout. I don't for a moment imagine that the one
771:
What nonsense. Editorial discretion is exercised at all levels of articles to ensure we are not lumbered with waffling bloated rubbish filled with true but entirely useless waffle. The census "information" is an excellent example of such crap. It's also entirely spurious (and OR) to state that
1247:
inconsistent citation was used maliciously, but inconsistent referencing will sink an article at FAC. I have witnessed it, and it is not nice to see. I'll remove the inconsistent citation and perhaps Rex will be so kind as to use the prevalent style, or alternatively to change all the others.
921:
have an idea of OR: it appears either you do not, or you fail to grasp what the census is. It means he was present in the property on one night. Nothing more, nothing less. To try and claim some residential status is very much in the OR camp, and really does back up the "waffle" status. –
660:
You may have added an attribution, but given the laughably inaccurate information on the BCC page, it's not a reliable source, especially as no-one has bothered to add a fecking citation to the article! Attribution is one thing, but it's still a lazy-arsed cut and paste job. It's about as
1175:
Replying to the ping: I don't recall seeing "The census data show them at such-and-such an address" in a
Featured Article (or even suggested at FAC) before, but I'll be happy to take another look (in the open Peer Review, not here) if someone wants to point me to relevant FAs. - Dank
1292:
Come, come, Andy. You know perfectly well what I am talking about. SchroCat and I have worked together for some weeks on improving this article from its existing poor state, and the PR is jointly nominated by us. Do look in, if you would like to make some constructive contributions.
756:
perhaps there is some published analysis that could expand on his relationships at that stage. In any case, I find such unexpected facts to be interesting and I suspect that I wouldn't be the only one. I'd like to see that paragraph and source returned to the article. --
1073:
think so, really is quite obnoxious. Get a consensus from others to include dross, because at the moment there is none. I do not intend to continue with such a pointless discussion with such an inflexible mindset as yours. Time to do something constructive. –
1381:
I'd be more than happy to regularise the citations used into a consistent CS1 style using the CS1 templates. However, before I do, I should point out that to cite books that appear multiple times with different pages really requires the use of either
1231:
Stop bloody edit warring rex. Potw added this this morning and it was reverted. Your on-going edit warring is neither helpful nor constructive. As to the citation, it's not good enough as it stands, and the information is pointless fluff. –
964:
means nothing (and I really don't know why you've quoted 1920 legislation for the 1901 census...) All Ive heard from you is obstreperous balls trying to try and force meaningless dross into the article without any context. Any coments on
623:
FFS Pigswill, instead of your knee-jerk reversions, see the thread on MRG's talk page (referred to in the edit summary), and do the fecking thing properly, rather than just edit warring to keep an unsourced COPYVIO in place. –
522:. I agree that the infobox improves the article, not only aesthetically, but also in terms of providing a handy quick overview to our readers, and by emitting machine-readable metadata. It's a win-win-win scenario!
1706:
put this theory to flight, when during his own research work he un-earthed a copy of Albert
William KETELBEY's original birth certificate. Remarkably there are still some writers who do not believe his name was
1855:
483:"His most famous compositions include . . . Phantasy for String Quartet Listed but never found (1915)" --- does this make sense to anyone else? It doesn't seem that a lost work could be one of his most famous.
1531:
which neither mentions that he conducted the WO, nor that the performances were broadcast, nor the date of the first such broadcast. The revert also removed the useful source. It should of course, be restored.
1450:
I've made a start on regularising the citations. I should be able to finish them by tomorrow, but please let me know if you want any tweaks to the detail (e.g. year in parentheses or no period at the end).
96:
35:
549:
It's a ghastly step backwards, but if you really wish to own the top right hand corners of every article, you'll only bully, bluster and lie your way into doing so, as you have done time and time again. -
1479:
1850:
960:
Thanks for the further ad hominem comment: you know nothing about me rex, so don't try to double guess me, or play silly buggers with me. The "fact" of where he was on one particular night in 1901
686:
have blue plaques on buildings where their notable subjects lived. I agree that there will always have to be a balance between the amount of detail and breadth of coverage, but I don't feel that:
807:
Rare or not, PR doesn't give you, Schro or anyone else a lock on an article nor exempt it from
Wikipedias norms or policies. Any instability is your choice, though your unnecessary edit warring.
608:
If you are going to claim you wrote the BCC page (believable, given the errors it contains), you need to note that somewhere on this talk page. You also need to provide a citation on the page. –
1002:
There is nothing there that suggests anything remotely encyclopaedic if included. "Facts" without context anywhere else on the page are utterly pointless and helps no-one understand anything. –
1818:
1628:
volume 56/1 page 454 "Reviewing a record of Ketèlbey orchestral pieces (July, page 261), I commented on the sleeve-note's suggestion that the name Ketèlbey was a pseudonym of
William Aston."
1518:{{cite web|url=http://genome.ch.bbc.co.uk/search/0/20?order=asc&q=Albert+Ket%C3%A8lbey#search|title=Search Results for "Albert Ketèlbey"|work=]|accessdate=5 July 2016}}</ref: -->
1750:
place name 'Kettelby/ Kettleby' a part of Bigby in
Lincolnshire to show that his ancestors derived their name from an English place name. It is a minor point but an enlightening one.
936:
I don't need your patronising, as I've been filling in census forms on behalf of myself and the members of my household for longer than you've been alive. The relevant legislation is
1885:
372:
838:
is exercised, you once again become abusive. And yes, that would indeed by "OR", but that's not what the paragraph in question said; the word "still" was not used. Without
60:
1338:
No need to be so grudging, Andy. Do try to be positive and look in at the PR. You can help us get the article to FAC, where you'll find we work with lots of other people.
115:
867:
As I have said, constructive contributions to the peer review would be most welcome. The path to FA is hard, as I'm sure you know, and all help is gratefully received.
1880:
1216:
template. There has been no discussion or consensus established to alter that style since then, so all inline citations should be consistent with the CS1 templates. --
1905:
461:
451:
1416:
section. Do either of you have any preference between harvb and sfn - I personally prefer the latter as it automatically takes care of duplicates, but YMMV. --
1069:
There is nothing "demonstrably false" about my opinion, which is about the census "information". Your arrogance in assuming you are right simply because
1900:
427:
1895:
1870:
324:
1890:
917:
I have neither tried to define standards, nor claim special privilege, so could you try and keep your ad hominem comments on the truthful side
1860:
1616:
issues 69-74 page 16 "Further to last month's query on
Ketelbey's name, the composer's birth certficate gives his parents as George Henry..."
1875:
1865:
1845:
644:"It wouldn't need to be removed from a copyright standpoint, but attributed ... to the government source until he demonstrates authorship."
328:
238:
1831:
1548:
1329:
1283:
858:
823:
538:
418:
395:
1910:
1809:
1791:
1751:
1656:
Has anyone got to the bottom of this? The
Classic CD item makes a reference to his birth certificate but I can only see a snippet.
1527:
He undertook annual tours of Britain, conducting his music with municipal orchestras, and also worked with the BBC Wireless Orchestra.
1034:
The 1901 census shows him living with his parents and four siblings, at 168, Antrobus Road, Handsworth, Staffordshire (now Birmingham)
332:
1714:
We have a brief mention of the "William Aston" name in a footnote. As this was a common misconception, perhaps we should say more?
1142:"permission": I don't agree with it for the reasons I have outlined. Tim does not for the reason he has given and, on the PR page,
323:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
154:
144:
1702:
Indeed as recently as the early 1970s Aston was believed by many to be his real name, until in January 1976, Fred Norris of the
367:
319:
282:
277:
233:
213:
150:
1523:
was reverted with the edit summary "WO work already mentioned". However, the only other mention of the WO in the article is:
568:
Whoa people, let's take a big, deep breath. I'd say we can respect article creators and lead editors - in both directions.
958:"I've been filling in census forms on behalf of myself and the members of my household for longer than you've been alive."
188:
1150:
has also given his opinion to leave it out. Time to stop threatening me – you can't bluster, bully or bullshit me rex.
1771:
wonder how many readers will ask themselves: "a million CDs, that long ago?" Could/should this somehow be made clear?
237:, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project
30:
1577:
article that "Wireless Orchestra" was never an established ensemble and was just a label applied to a much deplored
1719:
1661:
691:
1198:
adopted by the consensus of editors already working on the page, unless a change in consensus has been achieved.
1313:
You have indeed worked together; have a biscuit. However, you must work with more people than just each other.
176:
20:
1154:
attempts at ownership of this are not going to succeed. Time for you play nice and try to be constructive. –
1776:
1755:
1646:
page 25 "ASTON, WILLIAM (l875-l959) William Aston, who composed under the pseudonyms Albert W. Ketelbey ..."
1544:
1325:
1279:
854:
819:
772:"Ketèlbey was registered as still resident with his parents" based on such a scant and misleading "fact". –
534:
1572:
Quite so, and parenthetically I noticed "Wireless Orchestra" bolded by our excellent colleague Andy in the
1573:
1487:
423:
53:
1671:
Yes, Sant's biography is clear on this (after examining the birth certificate), and his name appears as
1609:
There are numerous sources which say or discuss whether he was born "William Aston". Examples include:
488:
194:
40:
1787:
484:
410:
389:
241:
is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!
131:
1715:
1657:
599:
find a better solution to have the data of birth and death together, which Persondata used to supply.
1581:
assemblage, packed with substitute players under the deputy system then still prevailing in London.
1109:
approaching the level of trolling, and this will undoubtedly be seen as such by a wider audience. –
1589:
1438:
1346:
1301:
1255:
1191:
I've reverted the removal of the Birmingham Post source. It was removed on the spurious grounds of
875:
795:
710:
639:
574:
1517:(including many, starting in 1926, where he conducted the Wireless Orchestra<ref name="RT": -->
973:
it informs or educates us as to what sort of individual he was, or how it influenced his music? -
426:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1813:
1772:
1733:
1684:
1563:
1535:
1406:
1372:
1316:
1270:
1267:
Tim: You might like to check the edit history; you have more than one co-editor on this article.
1237:
1159:
1114:
1079:
1007:
978:
927:
893:
845:
810:
777:
730:
666:
629:
613:
555:
525:
646:
I've added an attribution at the top of this page, for the moment, as an aid to our re-users. --
1483:
1210:
1192:
44:
937:
1827:
690:
The 1901 census shows him living with his parents and four siblings, at 168, Antrobus Road,
585:
311:
1456:
1421:
1386:
1221:
1129:
1099:
1041:
993:
946:
908:
761:
747:
651:
508:
1634:
page 1041 "There is a persistent legend that Ketèlbey's real name was William Aston..."
1584:
1433:
1341:
1296:
1250:
1177:
870:
790:
569:
1839:
1729:
1680:
1559:
1368:
1233:
1155:
1110:
1075:
1003:
974:
923:
889:
773:
662:
625:
609:
551:
638:
That sort of name-calling is beneath you. Please remove it. There is no copyvio and
584:
So because Pigsonthewing created a stub 11 years ago it's his call on the infobox?♦
357:
1396:
1091:
1823:
1780:
1759:
1737:
1723:
1688:
1665:
1596:
1567:
1552:
1491:
1460:
1445:
1425:
1376:
1353:
1333:
1308:
1287:
1262:
1241:
1225:
1181:
1163:
1133:
1118:
1103:
1083:
1045:
1011:
997:
982:
950:
931:
912:
897:
882:
862:
827:
802:
781:
765:
670:
655:
633:
617:
592:
576:
559:
542:
512:
492:
295:
271:
1452:
1417:
1217:
1125:
1095:
1037:
1027:
989:
942:
904:
757:
722:
647:
519:
504:
301:
1018:
Albert William Ketèlbey was born on 9 August 1875 at 41, Alma Street, in the
1506:
1145:
138:
1798:
225:
207:
1819:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 29 § 'Appy 'Ampstead'
1019:
1785:
331:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
1816:. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
1505:
By the early 1930s over 1,500 broadcasts of his work were made on
1023:
170:
356:
1679:
is right: the "Aston" name is little more than a legend. -
1652:
page 435 "Albert (William) Ketèlbey (orig William Aston..."
1480:
Knowledge:Today's featured article/requests/Albert Ketèlbey
1856:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
842:
of that word, it's not "OR", it's what the source says.
1804:
1202:
108:
89:
661:
sub-standard a piece of work as anyone can achieve. –
1851:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
1640:
page 2287 "Ketelbey, Albert William b. William Aston"
137:
Facts from this article were featured on Knowledge's
1812:
to determine whether its use and function meets the
1622:
page 806 "Ketelbey, Albert William b. William Aston"
1558:
Superfluous fluff – nothing "of course" about it. –
422:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1430:All Greek to me. Happy to leave it to the experts.
59:This article appeared on Knowledge's Main Page as
1700:
1632:Greene's Biographical Encyclopedia of Composers
1525:
1503:
1886:Low-importance biography (musicians) articles
888:the only basis for its removal, no others. –
8:
1402:within the text in conjunction with the CS1
43:. Even so, if you can update or improve it,
39:as one of the best articles produced by the
33:; it (or a previous version of it) has been
1200:" The first inline citations were added in
1638:The Guinness Encyclopedia of Popular Music
384:
266:
202:
68:
15:
231:This article is within the scope of the
174:
1881:FA-Class biography (musicians) articles
1644:The Heritage Encyclopedia of Band Music
698:
386:
268:
204:
1196:
1138:How tiresome. It's nothing to do with
1033:
1017:
957:
743:
739:
728:
643:
1906:Mid-importance West Midlands articles
7:
416:This article is within the scope of
317:This article is within the scope of
938:Census Act 1920, Schedule Section 1
834:And yet, when editorial discretion
436:Knowledge:WikiProject West Midlands
193:It is of interest to the following
439:Template:WikiProject West Midlands
14:
1620:The Encyclopedia of Popular Music
1206:on 6 June 2011 and they used the
969:it is important? Any comments on
694:, Staffordshire (now Birmingham).
1797:
409:
388:
304:
294:
270:
224:
206:
175:
130:
52:
19:
1901:FA-Class West Midlands articles
1822:until a consensus is reached.
456:This article has been rated as
341:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
247:Knowledge:WikiProject Composers
1896:WikiProject Biography articles
1871:WikiProject Composers articles
681:Removal of sourced information
671:22:25, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
656:22:06, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
634:20:29, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
618:17:02, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
344:Template:WikiProject Biography
250:Template:WikiProject Composers
1:
1891:Musicians work group articles
1728:Thanks Andrew - now added. -
1699:Thanks. Sant says on page 11
1501:My addition, after the text:
1461:20:33, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
1446:19:37, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
1426:19:07, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
1377:18:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
1354:21:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
1334:20:57, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
1309:19:36, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
1288:19:16, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
1263:18:44, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
1242:18:31, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
1226:18:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
1195:. CITEVAR advises us not to "
1182:19:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
1164:19:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
1134:18:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
1119:18:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
1104:18:20, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
1084:17:50, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
1046:17:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
1012:16:35, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
998:16:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
983:21:03, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
951:19:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
932:18:53, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
913:18:46, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
898:18:18, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
883:18:14, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
863:18:08, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
828:18:10, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
803:18:00, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
782:17:46, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
766:17:26, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
593:18:57, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
430:and see a list of open tasks.
365:This article is supported by
1861:Old requests for peer review
1781:06:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
493:17:33, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
329:contribute to the discussion
1876:FA-Class biography articles
1866:FA-Class Composers articles
1846:Knowledge featured articles
1760:04:47, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
1927:
1832:23:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
1738:10:38, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
1724:10:25, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
1689:09:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
1666:09:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
462:project's importance scale
97:Featured article candidate
1911:WikiProject West Midlands
1597:19:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
1568:18:22, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
1553:17:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
577:03:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
560:10:24, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
543:20:02, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
513:19:51, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
455:
419:WikiProject West Midlands
404:
364:
289:
219:
201:
161:
71:
67:
1810:redirects for discussion
1792:Redirects for discussion
1492:13:09, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
61:Today's featured article
1704:Birmingham Evening Mail
1673:Albert William Ketelbey
1709:
1529:
1511:
1412:templates used in the
442:West Midlands articles
361:
183:This article is rated
368:WikiProject Musicians
360:
320:WikiProject Biography
234:WikiProject Composers
1814:redirect guidelines
1808:has been listed at
41:Knowledge community
1497:Wireless Orchestra
738:Unknown parameter
362:
347:biography articles
253:Composers articles
189:content assessment
72:Article milestones
63:on August 9, 2016.
476:
475:
472:
471:
468:
467:
383:
382:
379:
378:
265:
264:
261:
260:
169:
168:
125:
124:
1918:
1807:
1805:'Appy 'Ampstead'
1801:
1788:'Appy 'Ampstead'
1594:
1592:
1587:
1551:
1542:
1538:
1520:
1443:
1441:
1436:
1411:
1405:
1401:
1395:
1391:
1385:
1351:
1349:
1344:
1332:
1323:
1319:
1306:
1304:
1299:
1286:
1277:
1273:
1260:
1258:
1253:
1215:
1209:
1205:
1149:
880:
878:
873:
861:
852:
848:
836:other than yours
826:
817:
813:
800:
798:
793:
752:
751:
745:
741:
736:
734:
726:
720:
718:
707:
590:
572:
541:
532:
528:
444:
443:
440:
437:
434:
413:
406:
405:
400:
392:
385:
349:
348:
345:
342:
339:
325:join the project
314:
312:Biography portal
309:
308:
307:
298:
291:
290:
285:
274:
267:
255:
254:
251:
248:
245:
228:
221:
220:
210:
203:
186:
180:
179:
171:
164:Featured article
162:Current status:
134:
111:
92:
90:January 16, 2016
69:
56:
31:featured article
23:
16:
1926:
1925:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1836:
1835:
1803:
1795:
1768:
1607:
1590:
1585:
1583:
1540:
1534:
1533:
1516:
1499:
1477:
1439:
1434:
1432:
1409:
1403:
1399:
1393:
1389:
1383:
1347:
1342:
1340:
1321:
1315:
1314:
1302:
1297:
1295:
1275:
1269:
1268:
1256:
1251:
1249:
1213:
1207:
1201:
1189:
1143:
876:
871:
869:
850:
844:
843:
815:
809:
808:
796:
791:
789:
737:
727:
716:
714:
709:
708:
704:
700:
683:
606:
586:
570:
530:
524:
523:
500:
481:
441:
438:
435:
432:
431:
398:
346:
343:
340:
337:
336:
310:
305:
303:
280:
252:
249:
246:
243:
242:
239:discussion page
187:on Knowledge's
184:
109:January 3, 2016
107:
88:
27:Albert Ketèlbey
12:
11:
5:
1924:
1922:
1914:
1913:
1908:
1903:
1898:
1893:
1888:
1883:
1878:
1873:
1868:
1863:
1858:
1853:
1848:
1838:
1837:
1794:
1784:
1767:
1764:
1747:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1711:
1710:
1692:
1691:
1654:
1653:
1647:
1641:
1635:
1629:
1626:The Gramophone
1623:
1617:
1606:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1498:
1495:
1476:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1188:
1187:Citation style
1185:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
955:
885:
832:
831:
830:
753:
740:|subscription=
702:
701:
699:
697:
695:
682:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
640:Moonriddengirl
605:
602:
601:
600:
582:
581:
580:
579:
563:
562:
546:
545:
499:
496:
480:
477:
474:
473:
470:
469:
466:
465:
458:Mid-importance
454:
448:
447:
445:
428:the discussion
414:
402:
401:
399:Mid‑importance
393:
381:
380:
377:
376:
373:Low-importance
363:
353:
352:
350:
316:
315:
299:
287:
286:
275:
263:
262:
259:
258:
256:
229:
217:
216:
211:
199:
198:
192:
181:
167:
166:
159:
158:
155:August 9, 2022
151:August 9, 2020
145:On this day...
135:
127:
126:
123:
122:
119:
112:
104:
103:
100:
93:
85:
84:
81:
78:
74:
73:
65:
64:
57:
49:
48:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1923:
1912:
1909:
1907:
1904:
1902:
1899:
1897:
1894:
1892:
1889:
1887:
1884:
1882:
1879:
1877:
1874:
1872:
1869:
1867:
1864:
1862:
1859:
1857:
1854:
1852:
1849:
1847:
1844:
1843:
1841:
1834:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1820:
1815:
1811:
1806:
1802:The redirect
1800:
1793:
1789:
1783:
1782:
1778:
1774:
1773:Imaginatorium
1766:Sales figures
1765:
1763:
1761:
1757:
1753:
1739:
1735:
1731:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1712:
1708:
1705:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1690:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1651:
1648:
1645:
1642:
1639:
1636:
1633:
1630:
1627:
1624:
1621:
1618:
1615:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1604:
1598:
1595:
1593:
1588:
1580:
1575:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1541:Pigsonthewing
1537:
1528:
1524:
1521:
1514:
1510:
1508:
1502:
1496:
1494:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1474:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1444:
1442:
1437:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1408:
1398:
1388:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1365:
1355:
1352:
1350:
1345:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1322:Pigsonthewing
1318:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1307:
1305:
1300:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1276:Pigsonthewing
1272:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1261:
1259:
1254:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1212:
1204:
1199:
1194:
1186:
1184:
1183:
1179:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1147:
1141:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1072:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
1000:
999:
995:
991:
986:
985:
984:
980:
976:
972:
968:
963:
959:
956:
954:
953:
952:
948:
944:
939:
935:
934:
933:
929:
925:
920:
916:
915:
914:
910:
906:
901:
900:
899:
895:
891:
886:
884:
881:
879:
874:
866:
865:
864:
860:
856:
851:Pigsonthewing
847:
841:
840:your addition
837:
833:
829:
825:
821:
816:Pigsonthewing
812:
806:
805:
804:
801:
799:
794:
785:
784:
783:
779:
775:
770:
769:
768:
767:
763:
759:
749:
732:
724:
712:
711:"1901 census"
706:
703:
696:
693:
689:
688:
687:
680:
672:
668:
664:
659:
658:
657:
653:
649:
645:
641:
637:
636:
635:
631:
627:
622:
621:
620:
619:
615:
611:
603:
597:
596:
595:
594:
591:
589:
578:
575:
573:
567:
566:
565:
564:
561:
557:
553:
548:
547:
544:
540:
536:
531:Pigsonthewing
527:
521:
517:
516:
515:
514:
510:
506:
497:
495:
494:
490:
486:
478:
463:
459:
453:
450:
449:
446:
433:West Midlands
429:
425:
424:West Midlands
421:
420:
415:
412:
408:
407:
403:
397:
396:West Midlands
394:
391:
387:
374:
371:(assessed as
370:
369:
359:
355:
354:
351:
334:
333:documentation
330:
326:
322:
321:
313:
302:
300:
297:
293:
292:
288:
284:
279:
276:
273:
269:
257:
240:
236:
235:
230:
227:
223:
222:
218:
215:
212:
209:
205:
200:
196:
190:
182:
178:
173:
172:
165:
160:
156:
152:
148:
146:
140:
136:
133:
129:
128:
120:
118:
117:
113:
110:
106:
105:
101:
99:
98:
94:
91:
87:
86:
82:
79:
76:
75:
70:
66:
62:
58:
55:
51:
50:
46:
42:
38:
37:
32:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1817:
1796:
1790:" listed at
1769:
1752:2.96.216.228
1748:
1703:
1701:
1676:
1672:
1655:
1649:
1643:
1637:
1631:
1625:
1619:
1613:
1608:
1582:
1578:
1549:Andy's edits
1545:Talk to Andy
1536:Andy Mabbett
1530:
1526:
1522:
1515:
1512:
1504:
1500:
1484:Gerda Arendt
1478:
1431:
1413:
1339:
1330:Andy's edits
1326:Talk to Andy
1317:Andy Mabbett
1294:
1284:Andy's edits
1280:Talk to Andy
1271:Andy Mabbett
1248:
1190:
1178:push to talk
1174:
1151:
1139:
1070:
1068:
1022:district of
970:
966:
961:
918:
868:
859:Andy's edits
855:Talk to Andy
846:Andy Mabbett
839:
835:
824:Andy's edits
820:Talk to Andy
811:Andy Mabbett
788:
754:
746:suggested) (
744:|url-access=
715:. Retrieved
705:
684:
607:
587:
583:
539:Andy's edits
535:Talk to Andy
526:Andy Mabbett
501:
482:
457:
417:
366:
318:
232:
195:WikiProjects
163:
142:
114:
95:
45:please do so
34:
26:
1707:Ketelbey...
1650:Répertitres
787:naturally.
717:17 December
642:was clear:
588:Dr. Blofeld
518:Thank you,
485:Jason Fruit
116:Peer review
1840:Categories
1614:Classic CD
1605:Birth name
1367:honest. –
1193:WP:CITEVAR
1092:disruptive
1090:issues is
1028:Birmingham
723:Findmypast
692:Handsworth
520:User:RexxS
503:effect. --
149:column on
36:identified
1716:Andrew D.
1658:Andrew D.
1586:Tim riley
1509:in a year
1507:BBC Radio
1435:Tim riley
1407:cite book
1343:Tim riley
1298:Tim riley
1252:Tim riley
1203:this edit
1030:, England
872:Tim riley
792:Tim riley
742:ignored (
731:cite news
571:Montanabw
338:Biography
283:Musicians
278:Biography
244:Composers
214:Composers
139:Main Page
1730:SchroCat
1681:SchroCat
1677:Greene's
1560:SchroCat
1369:SchroCat
1234:SchroCat
1211:cite web
1156:SchroCat
1111:SchroCat
1076:SchroCat
1004:SchroCat
975:SchroCat
924:SchroCat
890:SchroCat
774:SchroCat
663:SchroCat
626:SchroCat
610:SchroCat
552:SchroCat
479:Untitled
185:FA-class
121:Reviewed
102:Promoted
1762:Tony S
1414:Sources
1032:" and "
1020:Lozells
604:Copyvio
498:Infobox
460:on the
141:in the
80:Process
1824:Nickps
1579:ad hoc
1387:harvnb
1016:Both "
721:– via
713:. 1901
191:scale.
153:, and
83:Result
1574:BBCSO
1453:RexxS
1418:RexxS
1218:RexxS
1126:RexxS
1096:RexxS
1038:RexxS
1024:Aston
990:RexxS
962:still
943:RexxS
905:RexxS
758:RexxS
648:RexxS
505:RexxS
29:is a
1828:talk
1777:talk
1756:talk
1734:talk
1720:talk
1685:talk
1662:talk
1591:talk
1564:talk
1513:of:
1488:talk
1475:TFAR
1457:talk
1440:talk
1422:talk
1373:talk
1348:talk
1303:talk
1257:talk
1238:talk
1222:talk
1160:talk
1152:Your
1146:Dank
1130:talk
1115:talk
1100:talk
1080:talk
1042:talk
1008:talk
994:talk
979:talk
947:talk
928:talk
909:talk
894:talk
877:talk
797:talk
778:talk
762:talk
748:help
719:2015
667:talk
652:talk
630:talk
614:talk
556:talk
509:talk
489:talk
327:and
77:Date
1543:);
1397:sfn
1392:or
1324:);
1278:);
1071:you
971:how
967:why
853:);
818:);
533:);
452:Mid
1842::
1830:)
1779:)
1758:)
1736:)
1722:)
1687:)
1675:.
1664:)
1566:)
1547:;
1519:),
1490:)
1482:--
1459:)
1451:--
1424:)
1410:}}
1404:{{
1400:}}
1394:{{
1390:}}
1384:{{
1375:)
1328:;
1282:;
1240:)
1224:)
1214:}}
1208:{{
1180:)
1162:)
1140:my
1132:)
1117:)
1102:)
1082:)
1044:)
1026:,
1010:)
996:)
981:)
949:)
930:)
919:do
911:)
896:)
857:;
822:;
780:)
764:)
735::
733:}}
729:{{
669:)
654:)
632:)
616:)
558:)
537:;
511:)
491:)
375:).
281::
1826:(
1786:"
1775:(
1754:(
1732:(
1718:(
1683:(
1660:(
1562:(
1539:(
1486:(
1455:(
1420:(
1371:(
1320:(
1274:(
1236:(
1220:(
1176:(
1158:(
1148::
1144:@
1128:(
1113:(
1098:(
1078:(
1040:(
1006:(
992:(
977:(
945:(
926:(
907:(
892:(
849:(
814:(
776:(
760:(
750:)
725:.
665:(
650:(
628:(
612:(
554:(
529:(
507:(
487:(
464:.
335:.
197::
157:.
147:"
143:"
47:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
