Knowledge

Talk:Alberni–Clayoquot Regional District

Source 📝

30:. They are just junk left over from a junk decision/action. Any instances of these links remaining in articles have already been botted out of existence. Cluttering up redirect pages with templates may seem like fun to some, but it serves no purpose at all, nor does this redirect or others like it - forms which no one will ever search for, and which are not alternative names needing redirects. All redirects in this series should just be deleted (speedily, in the same way they were created). 54:
post {{db-g6|rationale=This name is never written with a dash and it will never be searched, it was only changed from hyphen to dash because of style reasons, and it was reverted in a RM discussion ]. I have already changed the incoming links.}} at the top of the
21:
This redirect is not even needed and should just be deleted, along with its sister dashed versions of these titles; they only exist because they were changed (without consensus) from their original hyphenated forms.
48: 88:"corrections" allegedly based on MOS from being perpetrated on these again without admin approval, or an RM (which they should have faced 80:
How is arthrosis different from arthritis? Aside from that, this afternoon after posting that and doing my running-around, it
138: 124: 101: 75: 39: 134: 71: 97: 35: 130: 118: 67: 66:
I would do it myself, but, uh, I have, eh, arthrosis in my mouse finger. Yeah, that's it. --
129:
Yes, leaving this redirect in place would prevent more well-intentioned WP:DASH moves. --
107: 93: 31: 112: 106:
I doubt this would be speedily deleted. It would be best taken to an
84:
occur to me that keeping these redirects is a way of preventing
26:
is ever going to search for them using an endash, repeat,
8: 17:Non-needed redirect, should be deleted 7: 92:, rather than the other way around). 14: 1: 139:18:34, 13 February 2011 (UTC) 125:04:38, 13 February 2011 (UTC) 102:01:32, 12 February 2011 (UTC) 76:20:53, 11 February 2011 (UTC) 40:19:27, 11 February 2011 (UTC) 161: 47:Change all the links in 49:"What links here" 152: 121: 115: 160: 159: 155: 154: 153: 151: 150: 149: 119: 113: 19: 12: 11: 5: 158: 156: 148: 147: 146: 145: 144: 143: 142: 141: 64: 63: 62: 59: 56: 52: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 157: 140: 136: 132: 128: 127: 126: 123: 122: 116: 109: 105: 104: 103: 99: 95: 91: 87: 83: 79: 78: 77: 73: 69: 65: 60: 57: 53: 50: 46: 45: 44: 43: 42: 41: 37: 33: 29: 25: 16: 114:McLerristarr 111: 89: 85: 81: 27: 23: 20: 131:Enric Naval 68:Enric Naval 90:originally 94:Skookum1 32:Skookum1 61:Profit! 120:Mclay1 108:WP:RFD 86:ad hoc 28:NO ONE 24:NO ONE 135:talk 98:talk 72:talk 55:page 36:talk 82:did 58:??? 137:) 117:| 110:. 100:) 74:) 38:) 133:( 96:( 70:( 51:. 34:(

Index

Skookum1
talk
19:27, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
"What links here"
Enric Naval
talk
20:53, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Skookum1
talk
01:32, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
WP:RFD
McLerristarr
Mclay1
04:38, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Enric Naval
talk
18:34, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.