Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Alonnah, Tasmania

Source 📝

255: 84: 205: 181: 98: 53: 22: 108: 229: 77: 724:-standing consensus has been that if an article was created with the short name, it could be left there, but articles with the state as a qualifying term in the title should not be moved. A small number of users refuse to accept this and occasionally pop up, move a few articles or attempt to make an innocuous tweak to the guideline to bolster their next attempt. -- 274: 847:
Alonnah, Tasmania, is not like Ramsholt. Towns of the colonies were usually named after European places or people, or from something taken from the local native language, and so it was always standard to introduce them with the state, nation, province or some form of region name. And this continues.
625:
have been disregarded dishonestly by many. Sydney, Australia, is a worldwide famous city and is not a good example. Lesser known towns in Australia are always comma disambiguated except in local sources. Australian places were very consistent and recognisable for a long time until people ignore
626:
reader considered and started sneaky moves to remove comma state. They should all be moved back. I challenge again to all supporting, what reader advantage to the minimalists’ title give? Why do you not care for consistency, consistency with other places, and consistency with the real world? —
644:
I note the discussion you cite was closed as hung in 2010. How much weight are we supposed to continue to give it? If you are still dissatisfied with the guidelines and the examples they give, i suggest that if there is no intervening discussion, sufficient time has now passed to have a new
744:. Clear case of unnecessary disambiguation which is misleading because it wrongly implies that there are other comparably notable topics named "Alonnah" when there are not. Long-standing consensus that favors leaving this here is misguided. Besides, NCAUST explicitly allows it. -- 501:, despite the eloquent arguments from those who wish to remove state or country names, and however they much try, as the creator of this talk page, I support keeping a referent to where it might be, regardless of where that fits with supporters of removal of the qualifying term. 756:
NCAUST does not advocate this change, but for maintaining the status quo, per the original article writer. PRECISE says nothing here. The current is the COMMONNANE, CONSISTENT with standard town and city naming across all the English speaking ex colonies.
542:; "the name of a city or town may be used alone if the place is the primary or only topic for that name" and "titles should unambiguously define the topical scope of the article, but should be no more precise than that". The example 326:
Time to close this debate, and we see no general agreement below to rename and drop the qualifier. As is usual with a no-consensus outcome, editors may try again in a few months to garner consensus for this title change.
484:, Australian places are almost always introduced with comma state, the exceptions being only local stuff. PRIMARYREDIRECTs have a low threshold for creation that doesn’t equate to a good reason to minimise the title. — 622: 568:. Nobody introduces “Sydney, NSW” like they do for country towns, where the state is an integral part of the character. Proponents for change need IAR, for the status quo see TITLECHANGES. — 695:
Given that there is now a central discussion on changing the guidelines, which currently looks like it will succeed, I have changed my vote to wait for the outcome of that discussion.
933: 678: 195: 795: 344: 340: 322: 784:
and including "'Tasmania"" is unnecessary disambiguation. I actually prefer disambiguation for these articles but Wikiedia doesn't mandate disambiguation. That said
938: 928: 171: 76: 790:
With place names, if the disambiguating term is a higher-level administrative division, it is often separated using a comma instead of parentheses, as in
923: 161: 190: 63: 948: 219: 958: 918: 953: 943: 312:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
83: 137: 124: 58: 214: 67: 332: 33: 538:
seems both highly pertinent to this article and unambiguous in its support of removing the qualifier in conjunction with
621:
NCAUST says no such thing. In fact it says nothing at all to this beyond acknowledging the status quo. The results of
888: 303: 360: 781: 660: 900: 313: 39: 21: 836: 823:
And that specifies that it is generally commas if needed, but disambiguation is not needed here, similar to
454: 812: 896: 423: 874: 748: 465:
The threshold for allowing a cheap redirect is way less than the criteria for a good article title. —
351: 737: 539: 438: 254: 853: 762: 700: 686: 668: 650: 631: 610: 573: 555: 528: 489: 470: 741: 588: 550:
here or influence a change to the current guideline, rather than relying on personal taste alone.
535: 518: 442: 829: 791: 596: 447: 133: 785: 316:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
264: 801: 371: 419: 405: 385: 204: 113: 547: 180: 870: 745: 725: 502: 849: 758: 696: 682: 664: 646: 627: 606: 569: 551: 524: 485: 466: 912: 592: 565: 380:– This is the only place name in the world, unnecessary to have disambigulation. 534:
Page moves are to be guided in the first instance by policy and guidelines, and
396: 381: 97: 52: 228: 103: 564:
No, Sydney is a world famous city, similar to the USPLACE exceptions of the
129: 878: 857: 842: 818: 766: 751: 728: 704: 690: 672: 654: 635: 614: 600: 577: 559: 505: 493: 474: 460: 427: 364: 824: 245: 777: 605:
NCAUST supports maintaining the author’s choice, I.e. the status quo. —
546:
is cited. People who oppose this move need to show why we should apply
328: 241: 543: 679:
Knowledge (XXG):Australian_Wikipedians'_notice_board#Suggestion
15: 895:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
253: 227: 203: 179: 376: 128:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of 887:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
903:. No further edits should be made to this section. 848:This is not so for towns in the old country. 720:The conversation linked above is one of many. 136:. If you would like to participate, visit the 8: 800:so disambiguation here seems acceptable. -- 19: 302:The following is a closed discussion of a 47: 934:Low-importance Australian places articles 517:for the outcome of current discussion of 49: 939:WikiProject Australian places articles 929:Start-Class Australian places articles 789: 445:as "Alonnah" already redirects here. 146:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Australia 7: 659:Nothing has changed. The answer is 38:It is of interest to the following 236:Need help improving this article? 14: 924:Low-importance Australia articles 780:redirects here. It's clearly the 949:Low-importance Tasmania articles 677:For the current discussion, see 531:) 10:11, 15 December 2018 (UTC)) 388:) 02:57, 24 November 2018 (UTC) 272: 106: 96: 82: 75: 51: 20: 331:to editors for your input, and 295:Requested move 24 November 2018 166:This article has been rated as 959:WikiProject Australia articles 919:Start-Class Australia articles 268:can be contacted via email to 149:Template:WikiProject Australia 1: 954:WikiProject Tasmania articles 944:Start-Class Tasmania articles 879:00:51, 22 December 2018 (UTC) 858:00:57, 17 December 2018 (UTC) 843:20:29, 16 December 2018 (UTC) 819:10:38, 15 December 2018 (UTC) 767:22:34, 14 December 2018 (UTC) 705:10:11, 15 December 2018 (UTC) 691:22:56, 14 December 2018 (UTC) 673:22:36, 14 December 2018 (UTC) 615:22:41, 14 December 2018 (UTC) 578:22:41, 14 December 2018 (UTC) 475:22:42, 14 December 2018 (UTC) 461:14:49, 24 November 2018 (UTC) 428:05:14, 13 December 2018 (UTC) 365:02:23, 24 December 2018 (UTC) 280:for non-editorial assistance. 242:National Library of Australia 212:This article is supported by 191:WikiProject Australian places 188:This article is supported by 776:- As pointed out by the nom 752:21:02, 5 December 2018 (UTC) 729:11:42, 5 December 2018 (UTC) 655:10:32, 5 December 2018 (UTC) 636:00:12, 5 December 2018 (UTC) 601:18:59, 4 December 2018 (UTC) 560:12:01, 4 December 2018 (UTC) 506:13:55, 1 December 2018 (UTC) 494:13:49, 1 December 2018 (UTC) 410:17:19, 2 December 2018 (UTC) 265:Wikimedia Australia chapter 975: 172:project's importance scale 645:discussion on the issue. 273: 261: 246:State Library of Tasmania 235: 211: 187: 165: 91: 46: 893:Please do not modify it. 309:Please do not modify it. 134:Australia-related topics 122:is within the scope of 258: 232: 208: 184: 28:This article is rated 869:per above arguments. 257: 231: 207: 183: 125:WikiProject Australia 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 215:WikiProject Tasmania 792:Windsor, Berkshire 259: 233: 209: 185: 152:Australia articles 34:content assessment 532: 430: 411: 372:Alonnah, Tasmania 367: 362: 348: 292: 291: 288: 287: 284: 283: 120:Alonnah, Tasmania 966: 839: 832: 808: 805: 796:Geographic names 522: 457: 450: 412: 403: 389: 379: 363: 358: 354: 338: 333:Happy Publishing 311: 279: 278:wikimedia.org.au 277: 276: 275: 154: 153: 150: 147: 144: 116: 114:Australia portal 111: 110: 109: 100: 93: 92: 87: 86: 85: 80: 79: 78: 73: 70: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 974: 973: 969: 968: 967: 965: 964: 963: 909: 908: 907: 837: 830: 815: 806: 803: 782:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 661:WP:TITLECHANGES 623:this discussion 513: 455: 448: 397: 375: 353:Paine Ellsworth 352: 307: 297: 271: 269: 238:Ask a Librarian 151: 148: 145: 142: 141: 112: 107: 105: 81: 74: 71: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 972: 970: 962: 961: 956: 951: 946: 941: 936: 931: 926: 921: 911: 910: 906: 905: 889:requested move 883: 882: 881: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 813: 771: 770: 769: 731: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 675: 639: 638: 619: 618: 617: 582: 581: 580: 523:(vote changed 511: 508: 496: 479: 478: 477: 369: 319: 318: 304:requested move 298: 296: 293: 290: 289: 286: 285: 282: 281: 260: 250: 249: 234: 224: 223: 220:Low-importance 210: 200: 199: 196:Low-importance 186: 176: 175: 168:Low-importance 164: 158: 157: 155: 118: 117: 101: 89: 88: 72:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 971: 960: 957: 955: 952: 950: 947: 945: 942: 940: 937: 935: 932: 930: 927: 925: 922: 920: 917: 916: 914: 904: 902: 898: 894: 890: 885: 884: 880: 876: 872: 868: 865: 859: 855: 851: 846: 845: 844: 840: 834: 833: 831:Crouch, Swale 826: 822: 821: 820: 816: 810: 809: 799: 797: 793: 787: 783: 779: 775: 772: 768: 764: 760: 755: 754: 753: 750: 747: 743: 739: 735: 732: 730: 727: 723: 719: 716: 715: 706: 702: 698: 694: 693: 692: 688: 684: 680: 676: 674: 670: 666: 662: 658: 657: 656: 652: 648: 643: 642: 641: 640: 637: 633: 629: 624: 620: 616: 612: 608: 604: 603: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 583: 579: 575: 571: 567: 563: 562: 561: 557: 553: 549: 545: 541: 537: 533: 530: 526: 520: 515: 509: 507: 504: 500: 497: 495: 491: 487: 483: 480: 476: 472: 468: 464: 463: 462: 458: 452: 451: 449:Crouch, Swale 444: 440: 436: 433: 432: 431: 429: 425: 421: 418: 417: 409: 408: 404: 402: 401: 395: 394: 387: 383: 378: 373: 368: 366: 361: 357: 356: 355: 346: 342: 337: 334: 330: 325: 324: 323:No consensus. 317: 315: 310: 305: 300: 299: 294: 267: 266: 256: 252: 251: 247: 243: 239: 230: 226: 225: 221: 218:(assessed as 217: 216: 206: 202: 201: 197: 194:(assessed as 193: 192: 182: 178: 177: 173: 169: 163: 160: 159: 156: 139: 135: 131: 127: 126: 121: 115: 104: 102: 99: 95: 94: 90: 69: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 892: 886: 866: 828: 802: 773: 733: 721: 717: 584: 566:AP_Stylebook 516: 510: 498: 481: 446: 434: 415: 414: 406: 399: 398: 392: 391: 370: 350: 349: 335: 321: 320: 308: 301: 262: 237: 213: 189: 167: 138:project page 123: 119: 40:WikiProjects 901:move review 726:Scott Davis 314:move review 30:Start-class 913:Categories 871:Rreagan007 738:WP:PRECISE 540:WP:PRECISE 521:guideline 503:JarrahTree 439:WP:PRECISE 416:Relisting. 393:Relisting. 345:page mover 897:talk page 850:SmokeyJoe 788:does say 759:SmokeyJoe 742:WP:NCAUST 697:MegaSloth 683:SmokeyJoe 665:SmokeyJoe 647:MegaSloth 628:SmokeyJoe 607:SmokeyJoe 589:WP:NCAUST 570:SmokeyJoe 552:MegaSloth 536:WP:NCAUST 525:MegaSloth 519:WP:NCAUST 486:SmokeyJoe 467:SmokeyJoe 443:WP:NCAUST 244:, or the 143:Australia 130:Australia 59:Australia 899:or in a 825:Ramsholt 786:WP:ATDAB 593:Dohn joe 68:Tasmania 778:Alonnah 774:Neutral 734:Support 585:Support 512:Support 499:Opppose 435:Support 377:Alonnah 359:, ed. 240:at the 170:on the 867:Oppose 807:Legend 804:Aussie 718:Oppose 548:WP:IAR 544:Sydney 482:Oppose 400:bd2412 382:B dash 64:Places 36:scale. 794:(see 329:Kudos 875:talk 854:talk 838:talk 763:talk 740:and 736:per 722:Long 701:talk 687:talk 669:talk 651:talk 632:talk 611:talk 597:talk 587:per 574:talk 556:talk 529:talk 514:Wait 490:talk 471:talk 456:talk 437:Per 424:talk 420:JC7V 386:talk 270:help 263:The 132:and 841:) 746:В²C 663:. — 459:) 343:by 341:nac 162:Low 915:: 891:. 877:) 856:) 827:. 817:) 798:). 765:) 703:) 689:) 681:. 671:) 653:) 634:) 613:) 599:) 591:. 576:) 558:) 492:) 473:) 426:) 413:-- 390:-- 374:→ 306:. 222:). 198:). 66:/ 62:: 873:( 852:( 835:( 814:✉ 811:( 761:( 757:— 749:☎ 699:( 685:( 667:( 649:( 630:( 609:( 595:( 572:( 554:( 527:( 488:( 469:( 453:( 441:/ 422:( 407:T 384:( 347:) 339:( 336:! 248:. 174:. 140:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Australia
Places
Tasmania
WikiProject icon
Australia portal
WikiProject Australia
Australia
Australia-related topics
project page
Low
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Australian places
Low-importance
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Tasmania
Low-importance
Note icon
National Library of Australia
State Library of Tasmania
Note icon
Wikimedia Australia chapter
requested move
move review
No consensus.
Kudos

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑