585:
eventually pinning you to the walls). Once you've found one, you need a helium balloon. Any size will do. The last thing you need is a wad of chewing gum. Now this bit can be a tad fiddly, but you need to attach just enough chewing gum to the string (tied to the balloon) so that the helium balloon neither sinks to the ground, nor floats away into the atmosphere. It doesn't have to be perfect, though. It CAN sink/ float a little, as long as the rate of climb/ fall is very small, as you'll need to observe it in the next part. The Next Part: - Take your helium balloon avec gum into the gravitron ride and before the ride starts spinning, release your balloon into the middle of the room. It doesn't have to be the exact middle of the room, really, just as long as it's somewhere where the balloon will not be struck by any part of the rotating room. Observe the results. Outcome: - The spinning room fails to generate or even simulate any kind of gravitational effect on the oblivious balloon. You'll see that it doesn't matter how fast or how slow the room is spinning, the balloon will continue to float in the middle of the room, oblivious. It's remotely possible that the moving air generated by the spinning room might cause the balloon to move, but that's NOT artificial gravity through rotation. That's just wind affecting a balloon! Conclusion: - You can't expect things that work in an environment where the pull of gravity is 'countered' by the person/ the earth to work in an environment where there is no equal/ opposite reaction to gravity, ie: Microgravity or 'Zero' gravity. The balloon remains unaffected by the spinning room because there are no forces acting directly upon it. However, you can change this. On the
Artificial Gravity page itself, the 2nd figure there, the moving gif one? If we assume that this is a top-down image of a rotating section of a space craft in microgravity, then once again, an astronaut floating in that room will continue to float in that room, regardless of how fast or how slow the room spins around him. He will never be pushed outwards to the rim, because there are no forces acting upon him (in that direction, or otherwise). HOWEVER, if you extend the 'spokes' in that image all the way from the hub to the rim, an astronaut floating anywhere inside will now find that once the station/ section starts rotating, while he is floating he will soon be struck by these 'spokes' and they will directly apply force to him in the direction of their travel. Of course, because the inside of a circle has a smaller circumference than the outside, these 'spokes' should be angeled to offset this (It's been many years since I did the calculations for this, but if memory serves, the optimal angle is about 13 degrees above the zero degree plane of a radian). Thus these spokes will serve as the floor, NOT the rim. Never the rim. If you find any of this confusing, just do the experiment for yourself. Once you're inside that spinning room, watching the balloon continuing to remain to be unaffected by the rotation, it should all make sense. Peace Raz
1590:(with, for instance, two spacecraft tethered together by long cables and rotating around each other, as in the 1989/90 Mars proposal) to research how the human body reacts to long periods of artificial Earth-strength gravity (and to learn about the optimum cable length, as too long is heavy and expensive, etc, and too short causes dizziness problems, etc, and what is the optimum number of cables to compensate for cable-snapping or micrometeorite-cable-cutting risks, etc) as seemingly needed for manned flights to Mars and beyond, as well as to long periods of lunar and Martian gravity as needed for prolonged work on the Moon and Mars (presumably interspersed with recuperation periods in artificial Earth-strength gravity in spacecraft or space stations orbiting the Moon or Mars). The cable-snapping or micrometeorite-cable-cutting risks would presumably be higher in a space station near Earth than in interplanetary space due Earth attracting them, and due artificial space debris orbiting Earth, etc. Do any reliable sources say any of this?
1271:
than the size of the hidden dimensions, can enter them. Producing ultra-short photons can thus manipulate gravity, with revolutionizing space travel applications such as cheap anti-gravity launches. The problem that it would require high energy can be practically solved by concentrating several laser beams on a nanoparticle, heating it to locally extreme temperatures. An
Alcubierre metric can be created by ejecting multiple nanoparticles from the craft and then beam perfectly timed laser beams on them (fire at the most distant first so that they are hit simultaneously), so each nanoparticle contributes a slower than light effect but together add up to faster than light, creating no discrete event horizon and thus no Hawking radiation.
200:
2440:, a simpler and easier way to generate artificial gravity. Using circulating air, one can create constant force on the body. This doesn't create a constant and uniform force like gravity, as it just affects the surfaces, but being in a constant force will mimic/simulate gravity and mitigate health effects like bone and muscle loss. Further, it can also be used on planetary surfaces to increase the gravity to earth's. It's simple to implement and the technology already exists. It is not constrained by size like centripetal force idea and others.
2281:
this little keener is from where there are alternative mechanisms for artificial gravity which come within an observable universe's distance of being as tractable as rotation for generating gravity. Maybe this fine person would like to speak up and explain why they felt sufficiently well informed to make this comment. And no, I am by no means the person who wrote the original sentence, just a human with a working brain and a passable knowledge of physics (got a piece of paper somewhere that'll back that up).
31:
85:
64:
190:
169:
280:
22:
2333:
canister). It's not the case if for example the spinning section resides entirely within the vessel's pressure canister. The hypothetical "Discovery" spacecraft in "2001: A Space
Odyssey" appears to represent an example of such a design. (Whereas the Russian spacecraft "Leonov" depicted in "2010: The Year We Make Contact" appears to require a pressure seal between the sections.)
95:
2268:
2227:, I've removed the off-topic "diamagnetism" material today, which had long been challenged. Waiting for other editors to review the free fall/parabolic flight and neutral buoyancy material. But several editors on this Talk page, in various sections, have expressed a problem with it. So if any one editor agrees after my edit today, I'd recommend just nixing it.
2429:
1691:
1796:
2252:
have been around for a while in funfairs and amusement parks, and they serve as a quite visible demonstration of a centrifuge in action. Please note that not all of the "gravity" shown is artificial, though! (The swings still point somewhat downwards, but the centrifuge causes "down" on the swings to
899:
are multiplied with no explicit operator. In my experience, when an operator is used for multiplying numbers, it is more often the cross than the dot, and in this case we need an operator or else rpm will look like three variables being multiplied together. A better solution might be to reduce rpm to
1589:
Do any reliable sources discuss (or even just mention) the reasons for the lack of any serious
Artificial Gravity research programmes on any of our current and previous space stations, and if they do, could we please have them mentioned in our article? These stations would seem to be the ideal place
1319:
I would tend to agree with you. I just removed an even more off-topic blob of prose. Have left a hidden note in that meta-subsection inviting other editors to consider whether neutral buoyancy and parabolic flight should be similarly removed. It seems off topic; but I think we need a 2021 look by
1270:
String theory (and all other theories involving hidden dimensions) predict that gravity and electromagnetism unify in hidden dimensions and that the hidden dimensions are indetectible because of their small size. It does also predict that sufficiently short-waved photons, with wavelengths shorter
1233:
Artificial gravity should also be considered as a possible source of a new form of transportation. Imaging if you could generate enough gravity to bend space (not too much or you would have a black hole which is bad news) to that rather than having to travel from point A to point B, you could cause
1108:
3. The earth (or any other celestial body) moves in space as I understand it in quite similar fashion to the spaceship which creates artificial gravity; which phenonomens of earths gravity can´t be explained by this similarity? Can for example that fact that the moon and other satelites orbits the
940:
I have rewritten the formula to replace the confusing crossproduct with a standard juxtaposition, and more importantly to get rid of the confusing built-in unit conversion, as well as the mix-up of a (non-standard) physical unit (rpm) with a physical quantity (rotation). I did so by expressing the
2280:
So, under section Human
Spaceflight we have the first sentence "The engineering challenges of creating a rotating spacecraft are comparatively modest to any other proposed approach." which some zealous if ill-informed wiki editor has flagged with "Original Research?". Just wondering what universe
1518:
Am I the only one that has a problem with THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY The effect of gravity can be simulated using other forces, but none of those forces are "gravity". I'd be happy with terms like "apparent gravity", "simulated gravity" just not artificial as if someone created
584:
Sorry for any lack of formatting. OK, there's a very easy experiment you can perform to show you why rotation COULD be used to simulate gravity, but NOT in the way it has been presented. To start, you need to find an amusement park/ carnival that has a gravitron ride (room that spins very fast,
1097:
I very interested in gravity, but on a amateur level. I think artificial gravity and some other facts raises some very interesting questions. Hopefully somebody will be kind enough to answer this or at least comment. Maybe this can even be helpful in the scope of the article. The questions are
2332:
In the "Mechanism" section the statement "A traversable interface between parts of the station spinning relative to each other requires large vacuum-tight axial seals." This isn't true if either section resides entirely within the other section (and thus entirely within the craft's pressure
941:
radius of rotation in terms of the orbital period (i.e. a time), e.g. 30 s instead of 2 rpm. That way the formula is just a copy of the standard centripetal force formula, so one citation-needed is no longer needed in the text. Per the standard SI philosophy, units out are given by units in.
2375:
The "Balls in a rotating spacecraft" image is misleading as it is showing a ball on a curved path in microgravity. A ball will travel in a straight line until it touches a surface. It might appear to travel in a curve by an observer moving with the space station, but not from the stationary
1066:
What about this - a spaceship moving in a spiral or corkscrew pattern, whith a constatnt velocity along the axis of the corkscrew and the proper diameter and velocity around the circumference of the corkscrew, would move through space at whatever speed desired and provide constant gravity.
1217:
magnitude, as the lede currently implies. I have read plenty in the literature where artificial gravity environments of, say Moon gravity, at 60 milligees, or for cryogenic fluid management of rocket fuel and oxidizer in second-stages are referred to as "artificial gravity." Cheers.
284:
1202:) low-thrust space propulsion systems that does, in fact, provide a measurable amount, albeit quite low, of artificial gravity. Some of the other material was only recently tagged ; in my view, the tagged material that needs to be sourced ought to be given some
1468:, despite the fact that many of them rely on their use of acceleration or centrifugal force for the thrill. Scramblers, roller coasters, and other centrifuges have all been employed at amusement parks, yet nary a word is written about them in this article. —
1907:
2195:
2165:
2200:
561:
There is also
Centrifugal force in a stationary reference frame in ideal circular motion. However instead of the object having centrifugal force exerted on it, it would be exerting centrifugal force on the circe. I.e on a merry-go-round or somesuch.
2336:
I suggest eliminating the statement altogether because it's a relatively modest design element. However an option could be: "Depending upon the spececraft's configuration a pressure seal between stationary and rotating sections might be required."
2193:
1344:
in a uniform gravitational field would travel along a parabolic trajectory. However, if the Earth were perfectly spherical, only objects moving at the escape velocity would follow a parabolic trajectory, all slower velocities would result in bound
2179:
2124:
But "artificial gravity" may or may not be taken to include linear acceleration (?) as well as various sci-fi concepts. It is not obvious that these should be treated as the same topic, it may be better to use disambiguation.
1067:
Essentially you would need to provide thrust of 1g with a vector directly into the center of the corkscrew and then rotate the ship so that "up" is always facing the center. How about it? ] 22:05, 6 November 2007 (UTC)micximus
2181:
1190:. The deletion was of a fairly large amount of text, some of it sourced. My view is that the sourced material deletion should be discussed here on the Talk page first before deletion as it is a plausible useful example of
1908:
https://nspires.nasaprs.com/external/viewrepositorydocument/cmdocumentid%3D477169/solicitationId%3D%7B9927D6DC-C2F9-5D3E-8BF1-EA4EE3EE0A37%7D/viewSolicitationDocument%3D1/HRP%20Artificial%20Gravity%20Evidence%20Report.pdf
2202:
2191:
1300:
It should focus on the increase of apparent gravity during space travel. The methods to simulate weightlessness (neutral buoyancy and parabolic flight) are already presented --and more accurately-- in the article on
1101:
1. Gravity from mass is considered "real" gravity and gravity from acceleration and spinning is considered "artificial" gravity; how can such apparently different phenonomens both create apparently similar forces?
771:
1609:
This sentence is troubling: "Unlike real gravity, which pulls towards a center, this pseudo-force in rotating reference frames gives a rotational 'gravity' that pushes away from the axis of rotation."
1352:
I suggest changing the section on "parabolic flight" to "elliptic flight". In this past this change has been met with resistance by flat-Earthers. They correctly point out that pilots at both NASA and
394:
Until it is confirmed in another published article, I'd describe the field generator as science fiction for now (unfortunately, it would be an awesome invention if applicable in manned space travel).
1105:
2. When you flush the sink with water the earth´s gravity helps removing the water back in the piping, but the circular movements implies that the earth´s spinning has something to do with things?
592:
2282:
2164:
Google books suggests that "artificial gravity" is mostly used in sci-fi, but it is also does see recent use for rotational gravity in serious-if-popular discussion of manned spaceflight, e.g.
1499:
I've updated the rotation speed plot in the
Rotation subsection, mostly to put it in SVG format (previous was in PNG), as well as updating axis labels to be more descriptive and understandable.
2254:
484:
537:
2555:
370:
someone should add the recent discovery made at the ESA (see www.esa.int/SPECIALS/GSP/SEM0L6OVGJE_0.html ). I'm not qualified enough to do so, so someone else should probably do. : -->
2590:
1397:(a measurable difference in lattitude or longitude.) Why don't you use that magnificent brain to see if you can come up with a sufficiently insulting term for those of us who use
1356:
refer to free-fall flight trajectories as "parabolas". Do these pilots know something we don't? and why don't those planes have any windows? 20:18, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
2545:
2560:
850:
2055:
2051:
2037:
1945:
1941:
1927:
676:
696:
391:
Speed reading the article shows that a bearing was damaged in their experiment, which caused noise on the sensors but assumed to be smaller than the observed effect...
897:
256:
797:
2170:"pseudogravity" is, surprisingly, primarily a term in geophysics, as a well defined mathematical object, as far as I can tell in some kind of fourier transform on "
151:
870:
2492:. It's not a new idea, and it's not artificial gravity because anything with an angled surface would be pushed to the side rather than in the desired direction.
35:
2570:
141:
2540:
1071:
No known propulsion system can work for long enough to make this worthwhile; it uses either obscene amounts of propellant, and/or obscene amounts of energy.
2550:
2199:"centrifugal gravity" appears to by a synonym in good standing of "rotational gravity", although more typically used in the context of high-g centrifuges.
2355:
I revised the page by changing the original sentence to "Depending upon the spececraft's configuration..." Please advise if any discomfort. Cheers. --
2575:
2565:
1422:"Rotation". Metres should be spelt metres and not meters. A meter is a device that measures, like a gas meter. A metre is a standard unit of length.
304:
117:
2585:
246:
1546:, which is why it should probably be done via an explicit proposal on this Talk page, to get a wider cross-section of editors involved. Cheers.
199:
2580:
1163:
2178:. Of course "pseudogravity" also sees sci-fi usage and what not, but this seems to be the primary usage of the term in scientific literature
222:
2513:
2407:
2315:
1429:
1393:
measurable deviation of the trajectory of a free-falling plane from a true parabola (as there is none of a flat Earth from its true shape)
704:
108:
69:
2271:
A swing ride. In this case, the direction of the Earth's gravity is indicated by the tower in the middle. Note that the top is at a tilt.
2535:
1281:
925:
569:
596:
2286:
2258:
1519:
gravity without a mass. Maybe a diclaimer in the lead, explaining that the effects "seem like gravity" and aren't actually "gravity".
2033:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1923:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1147:
1017:
2023:
414:
Can someone add formulae regarding the numbers that are in the rotation section? The numbers that I get by using the formulae at
2128:
Finally, it is very questionable to treat under "artificial gravity" the topics of "levitation" or "weightlessness", including
213:
174:
2455:
44:
283:
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki
Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
1401:
to handle everyday situations instead of relativity (similar approximate accuracy.) The article is just fine the way it is.
1479:
This paragraph is in the wrong place. It doesn't help the ongoing discussion. Please consider a different place to put it.
2391:
1372:
2098:
1988:
1913:
1143:
1803:
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the
445:
331:
_< Great game, but not a very good example for someone looking up examples of how artificial gravity might work.
2360:
2345:
980:
816:
The dot isn't usual in my experience. Usually, multiplication is represented by simply juxtaposition. For example
489:
2144:", and I would suggest linking these topics from a terminological section, or diasambiguation page, at best. --
2054:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1944:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1542:
the article to something better. "Simulated gravity" or similar might work. But "Artificial gravity" MAY meet
2310:
1234:
points A & B to come together. After all, black holes can be seen to bend light, space, and and even time.
1167:
2517:
2411:
1433:
50:
21:
2175:
1285:
929:
2089:
2015:
1979:
1891:
1444:
For the record, the article is written in
American English, which uses the spelling "meter", not "metre". -
573:
388:, which observed some gravity like effects from superconducting magnets, but this hasn't been confirmed yet.
2443:
2379:
1543:
1425:
1360:
1277:
1159:
1156:
I deleted this section again. There are no citations and method described is unrealistic and impractical.
1013:
968:
921:
588:
565:
2133:
2011:
1865:
1524:
1504:
1406:
543:
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS CENTRIFUGAL FORCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2356:
2341:
2073:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2061:
1963:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1951:
1835:
1815:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1723:
1703:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1021:
221:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
116:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2387:
2014:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1890:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1535:
1520:
375:
2489:
1773:
1500:
296:
2447:
1086:
This article needs a section that discusses the usefullness / potential uses of Artificial Gravity.
976:
910:
808:
2451:
2298:
2211:
2149:
1595:
399:
336:
327:
Somebody should add the halo's in the videogames Halo and Halo 2. I'm too tired as of the now. :\
2383:
1622:
1571:
1480:
1203:
1131:
611:
If anyone is interested, I wrote a Java applet to simulate rotational gravity in a space station.
351:
2114:
2007:
1901:
1883:
1745:
1644:
1567:
1386:
1309:
1235:
1116:
946:
641:
312:
292:
100:
2117:" redirects here, and this is a coherent topic (although with considerable topical overlap with
2058:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2024:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110225085854/http://hobbyspace.com//nucleus/index.php?itemid=26786
1948:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1194:(the subject of the section in which the material appears) artificial gravity in current (e.g.,
419:
2074:
1964:
1816:
1704:
972:
2497:
2118:
1861:
1755:
1654:
1626:
1575:
1484:
1402:
1398:
1368:
1255:
1036:
415:
355:
1539:
819:
2297:
The entire paragraph was original research attemepting to come up with proposals. Deleted. –
1831:
1719:
1449:
1239:
1187:
661:
645:
2187:
2081:
2027:
1971:
1823:
1711:
1183:
1139:
681:
2376:
perspective that the viewer of this image would have. The ball in the center is correct.
1763:
1662:
1072:
875:
620:
552:
434:
1209:
I've also started looking for sources that would support a narrow article focus only for
782:
539:; where g is the acceleration in terms of earth's gravity and r is the radius in meters.
2224:
2207:
2145:
2040:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1930:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1591:
1302:
637:
395:
332:
205:
84:
63:
2080:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2047:
1970:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1937:
1822:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1710:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1421:
In the "Calculations" example under "Methods for generating artificial gravity" -: -->
1135:
855:
2529:
2232:
1914:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070626165503/http://dx12.jsc.nasa.gov/about/index.shtml
1551:
1469:
1325:
1305:
1223:
1112:
1051:
996:
942:
308:
1617:
It calls centrifugal force a "pseudo-force" - where is the author's source for that?
2493:
2141:
1364:
1251:
1195:
288:
1614:
It gives the impression that gravity, like centrifugal force, depends on rotation.
962:
384:
I can't find the article you mentioned, the link is dead. I did find an article,
2183:. Clearly, this technical usage of "pseudogravity" is a case for disambiguation.
1465:
1445:
1341:
901:
347:
279:
189:
168:
113:
330:
This would be a much better video game reference than Super Mario Galaxy. : -->
2477:
2437:
2249:
2046:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1936:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
195:
90:
1917:
2521:
2501:
2459:
2415:
2395:
2364:
2349:
2321:
2290:
2267:
2262:
2236:
2215:
2153:
2129:
2103:
1993:
1869:
1843:
1731:
1630:
1599:
1579:
1555:
1528:
1508:
1488:
1473:
1453:
1437:
1410:
1329:
1313:
1289:
1259:
1243:
1227:
1171:
1151:
1120:
1075:
1055:
1025:
1000:
984:
950:
933:
913:
904:
811:
648:
623:
600:
577:
555:
437:
422:
403:
378:
359:
340:
316:
614:
2228:
2171:
2137:
1547:
1353:
1321:
1219:
1047:
992:
1849:
Artificial gravity played some important role in Passengers (2016) film.
1760:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
1672:
1659:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
1007:
2428:
965:" brings up a 404 error. If anyone can update the link, please do so.
678:
is used as a multiplication sign. Does someone know why the usual sign
218:
1698:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
2245:
Visible demonstration of centripetal/centrifugal force in "real life"
1621:
I'd be glad to remove this; the rest of the section doesn't need it.
1382:
1199:
766:{\displaystyle g={\frac {R({\frac {\pi \times rpm}{30}})^{2}}{9.81}}}
636:
Hey, there is no mention of magnetic boots! There's a redirect page "
385:
2266:
1860:
Please also mention Passengers (2016) film also in this category.
1774:
https://web.archive.org/20160206031752/http://www.marsgravity.org/
1768:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
1667:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
1134:. Do not restore "Mass" section without good citations, following
1777:
1534:
Old comment, but I'll weigh in. Yeah, you are probably right
15:
1042:. You can do this yourself. Just edit the section and add "
1783:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
1678:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
800:
2018:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1894:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1566:
Does it really belong in here? I propose relocating it to
2190:
primary term used in elementary physics and engineering.
2512:
Hello I would like to talk about science and technology
2028:
http://www.hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=26786
1744:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1643:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
991:
As of Feb 2011, this link is no longer in the article.
1887:
1749:
1648:
1206:
to be cited, and only then removed from the article.
1853:
You guys already mention Interstellar (2014) film in
1538:. I'd participate if you were to make a proposal to
1464:
I see nothing in here about amusement parks or their
878:
858:
822:
785:
707:
684:
664:
492:
448:
274:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
2556:
Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in Technology
217:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
112:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2050:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1940:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1385:by insulting people who use the word this way as "
1109:earth only be explained in reference to the mass?
1046:" immediately after the closing reftag. Cheers.
891:
864:
844:
791:
765:
690:
670:
531:
478:
2328:Pressure canister seals are not always necessary.
1340:If the Earth were perfectly flat, a free falling
1320:another editor besides me to nix it. Cheers.
963:http://users.wpi.edu/~rcaron/mars/gravity.shtml
479:{\displaystyle RPM=29.91{\sqrt {\frac {g}{r}}}}
366:Field generator is not not only fiction anymore
2591:Start-Class physics articles of Mid-importance
2036:This message was posted before February 2018.
1926:This message was posted before February 2018.
532:{\displaystyle r={\frac {894.6g}{{RPM}^{2}}}}
8:
2546:Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Technology
1395:unless the distances are significantly large
900:a single letter, then use juxtaposition. --
778:R = Radius from center of rotation in meters
658:If I understand this formula properly, this
427:I just checked it; 224m at 2rpm that means:
2478:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzibpZ3j8uM
2436:In 2021, Vivek Kedia proposed and patented
19:
2006:I have just modified one external link on
1918:http://dx12.jsc.nasa.gov/about/index.shtml
1882:I have just modified one external link on
586:
163:
58:
883:
877:
857:
836:
821:
784:
751:
723:
714:
706:
683:
663:
521:
510:
499:
491:
464:
447:
323:The Halo in the Halo series of videogames
305:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
2561:Start-Class vital articles in Technology
2427:
1250:This is not the place for speculation. —
918:Can use "f" for frequency of rotation.
654:x in the formula indicates crossproduct?
615:http://www.wolfkeeper.plus.com/coriolis/
2470:
1266:String theory predict gravitomagnetism.
593:2001:8003:7992:9E00:CD56:E296:7D59:22E1
303:Above undated message substituted from
165:
126:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Spaceflight
60:
2541:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles
2283:2001:56A:F0E9:9B00:41F4:C18A:9CBF:A083
1804:
2255:2601:8B:C302:D530:216D:3386:9C8A:70AF
2186:"rotational gravity" seems to be the
1673:http://www.hfml.ru.nl/20t-magnet.html
1008:http://www.hfml.ru.nl/20t-magnet.html
776:g = Decimal fraction of Earth gravity
7:
1336:Flat-Earthers and "parabolic" flight
418:give me a smaller necessary radius.
211:This article is within the scope of
106:This article is within the scope of
2571:Mid-importance spaceflight articles
2432:AirSim, simulated gravity animation
231:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Physics
49:It is of interest to the following
2551:Start-Class level-5 vital articles
386:http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0603033
14:
2010:. Please take a moment to review
1886:. Please take a moment to review
1748:. Please take a moment to review
1647:. Please take a moment to review
430:r=224 w=0.209 radians per second
2576:WikiProject Spaceflight articles
2566:Start-Class spaceflight articles
2420:What do you guys think of this?
1794:
1689:
547:There is centrifugal force in a
278:
198:
188:
167:
129:Template:WikiProject Spaceflight
93:
83:
62:
29:
20:
2586:Mid-importance physics articles
251:This article has been rated as
146:This article has been rated as
2406:gif not working. Need to fix.
2340:Thoughts please! Cheers. --
2174:" in the context of modelling
1671:Attempted to fix sourcing for
1260:06:16, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
748:
720:
578:12:40, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
2522:15:37, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
2502:19:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
2460:18:04, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
2416:02:59, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
2365:19:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
2350:09:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
2291:07:51, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
1844:18:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
1600:14:46, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
1580:16:41, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
1489:16:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
1474:14:13, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
1314:13:14, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
1244:02:39, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
1152:21:52, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
804:rpm = revolutions per minute
619:I think it's kinda fun, YMMV.
360:16:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
225:and see a list of open tasks.
120:and see a list of open tasks.
2581:Start-Class physics articles
2263:19:49, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
2104:07:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
1529:21:16, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
1411:21:05, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
1228:08:50, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
1076:23:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
1056:23:39, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
1032:I have tagged the link as a
1026:22:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
1001:23:39, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
985:19:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
644:, but it's not mentioned...
624:04:23, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
551:, as well as coriolis force.
404:08:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
317:14:47, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
234:Template:WikiProject Physics
1778:http://www.marsgravity.org/
1732:10:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
1631:19:25, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
1509:18:17, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
1460:Amusement park thrill rides
1178:Scope of artificial gravity
1172:15:26, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
2607:
2536:Start-Class vital articles
2488:This is just describing a
2396:19:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
2067:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2003:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1957:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1879:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1766:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
1741:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1665:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
1640:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1290:13:01, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
951:09:33, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
934:03:16, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
556:02:45, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
379:15:40, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
257:project's importance scale
152:project's importance scale
2237:18:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
1994:00:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
1870:03:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
1556:18:54, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
1454:09:27, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
1438:11:16, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
1330:18:50, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
1296:This article is confusing
1121:12:51, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
914:00:52, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
905:19:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
812:10:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
601:12:17, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
438:20:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
423:14:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
341:07:06, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
250:
183:
145:
78:
57:
2322:00:41, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
2216:08:54, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
2154:08:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
845:{\displaystyle e=mc^{2}}
649:16:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
549:rotating reference frame
1999:External links modified
1875:External links modified
1737:External links modified
1636:External links modified
1198:) and near-term (e.g.,
1144:The Hero of This Nation
671:{\displaystyle \times }
109:WikiProject Spaceflight
2433:
2272:
2176:Earth's magnetic field
2134:diamagnetic levitation
1274:By Martin J Sallberg
1126:Deleted "Mass" section
893:
866:
846:
793:
767:
692:
691:{\displaystyle \cdot }
672:
533:
480:
2431:
2402:Simulated gravity gif
2276:Original Research!!??
2270:
1585:Space stations and AG
894:
892:{\displaystyle c^{2}}
867:
847:
794:
768:
693:
673:
534:
481:
287:. Student editor(s):
43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
36:level-5 vital article
2490:Vertical wind tunnel
2048:regular verification
1938:regular verification
1791:to let others know.
1752:. If necessary, add
1686:to let others know.
1651:. If necessary, add
1186:deletion of text by
1182:I reverted a recent
876:
856:
820:
792:{\displaystyle \pi }
783:
705:
682:
662:
490:
446:
410:fomulae for rotation
132:spaceflight articles
2371:Image is misleading
2293:JustSomeWikiReader
2140:along with sci-fi "
2038:After February 2018
1928:After February 2018
1787:parameter below to
1682:parameter below to
1495:Rotation Speed Plot
1381:You are only being
1192:linear acceleration
433:rw^2 = 9.826 m/s^2
214:WikiProject Physics
2434:
2273:
2115:Rotational gravity
2092:InternetArchiveBot
2043:InternetArchiveBot
2008:Artificial gravity
1982:InternetArchiveBot
1933:InternetArchiveBot
1884:Artificial gravity
1746:Artificial gravity
1645:Artificial gravity
1568:astronaut training
1354:Zero G corporation
1211:artificial gravity
1010:" is broken too.
889:
862:
842:
789:
763:
688:
668:
642:Artificial gravity
529:
476:
291:. Peer reviewers:
285:on the course page
101:Spaceflight portal
45:content assessment
2446:comment added by
2424:Simulated gravity
2382:comment added by
2214:
2152:
2119:absolute rotation
2068:
1958:
1842:
1730:
1428:comment added by
1399:Newtonian physics
1377:
1363:comment added by
1280:comment added by
1162:comment added by
1062:Corkscrew Pattern
1016:comment added by
987:
971:comment added by
924:comment added by
865:{\displaystyle m}
761:
745:
603:
591:comment added by
580:
568:comment added by
527:
474:
473:
416:centrifugal force
271:
270:
267:
266:
263:
262:
162:
161:
158:
157:
2598:
2480:
2475:
2462:
2398:
2357:H Bruce Campbell
2342:H Bruce Campbell
2318:
2313:
2253:move outwards.)
2210:
2148:
2102:
2093:
2066:
2065:
2044:
1992:
1983:
1956:
1955:
1934:
1905:
1838:
1837:Talk to my owner
1833:
1806:
1801:
1798:
1797:
1767:
1759:
1726:
1725:Talk to my owner
1721:
1696:
1693:
1692:
1666:
1658:
1562:Training section
1440:
1376:
1357:
1292:
1188:User:Rememberway
1174:
1045:
1041:
1035:
1028:
966:
936:
898:
896:
895:
890:
888:
887:
871:
869:
868:
863:
851:
849:
848:
843:
841:
840:
798:
796:
795:
790:
772:
770:
769:
764:
762:
757:
756:
755:
746:
741:
724:
715:
697:
695:
694:
689:
677:
675:
674:
669:
563:
538:
536:
535:
530:
528:
526:
525:
520:
508:
500:
485:
483:
482:
477:
475:
466:
465:
319:
282:
239:
238:
237:physics articles
235:
232:
229:
208:
203:
202:
192:
185:
184:
179:
171:
164:
134:
133:
130:
127:
124:
103:
98:
97:
96:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
42:
33:
32:
25:
24:
16:
2606:
2605:
2601:
2600:
2599:
2597:
2596:
2595:
2526:
2525:
2510:
2485:
2484:
2483:
2476:
2472:
2441:
2426:
2404:
2377:
2373:
2330:
2316:
2311:
2278:
2247:
2111:
2096:
2091:
2059:
2052:have permission
2042:
2016:this simple FaQ
2001:
1986:
1981:
1949:
1942:have permission
1932:
1899:
1892:this simple FaQ
1877:
1855:science fiction
1851:
1841:
1836:
1799:
1795:
1761:
1753:
1739:
1729:
1724:
1694:
1690:
1660:
1652:
1638:
1607:
1587:
1564:
1516:
1497:
1462:
1423:
1419:
1389:". There is no
1358:
1349:trajectories.
1338:
1298:
1275:
1268:
1204:reasonable time
1180:
1164:199.182.214.218
1157:
1128:
1095:
1084:
1064:
1043:
1039:
1033:
1011:
959:
919:
879:
874:
873:
854:
853:
832:
818:
817:
781:
780:
747:
725:
716:
703:
702:
680:
679:
660:
659:
656:
634:
609:
509:
501:
488:
487:
444:
443:
442:Or you can use
412:
368:
325:
302:
297:Emily rodriguez
276:
236:
233:
230:
227:
226:
204:
197:
177:
131:
128:
125:
122:
121:
99:
94:
92:
72:
40:
30:
12:
11:
5:
2604:
2602:
2594:
2593:
2588:
2583:
2578:
2573:
2568:
2563:
2558:
2553:
2548:
2543:
2538:
2528:
2527:
2514:41.115.114.106
2509:
2506:
2505:
2504:
2482:
2481:
2469:
2468:
2464:
2425:
2422:
2408:121.74.135.184
2403:
2400:
2372:
2369:
2368:
2367:
2329:
2326:
2325:
2324:
2277:
2274:
2246:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2219:
2218:
2204:
2197:
2184:
2168:
2162:
2160:
2110:
2107:
2086:
2085:
2078:
2031:
2030:
2022:Added archive
2000:
1997:
1976:
1975:
1968:
1921:
1920:
1912:Added archive
1910:
1876:
1873:
1850:
1847:
1834:
1828:
1827:
1820:
1781:
1780:
1772:Added archive
1738:
1735:
1722:
1716:
1715:
1708:
1676:
1675:
1637:
1634:
1619:
1618:
1615:
1606:
1603:
1586:
1583:
1563:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1515:
1512:
1496:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1461:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1430:94.197.127.136
1418:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1337:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1303:weightlessness
1297:
1294:
1267:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1232:
1179:
1176:
1127:
1124:
1094:
1091:
1083:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1063:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1004:
1003:
958:
955:
954:
953:
886:
882:
861:
839:
835:
831:
828:
825:
807:
803:
788:
779:
777:
775:
773:
760:
754:
750:
744:
740:
737:
734:
731:
728:
722:
719:
713:
710:
701:
687:
667:
655:
652:
638:Magnetic boots
633:
632:Magnetic boots
630:
628:
608:
605:
583:
559:
558:
542:
524:
519:
516:
513:
507:
504:
498:
495:
472:
469:
463:
460:
457:
454:
451:
411:
408:
407:
406:
392:
389:
367:
364:
363:
362:
324:
321:
275:
272:
269:
268:
265:
264:
261:
260:
253:Mid-importance
249:
243:
242:
240:
223:the discussion
210:
209:
206:Physics portal
193:
181:
180:
178:Mid‑importance
172:
160:
159:
156:
155:
148:Mid-importance
144:
138:
137:
135:
118:the discussion
105:
104:
88:
76:
75:
73:Mid‑importance
67:
55:
54:
48:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2603:
2592:
2589:
2587:
2584:
2582:
2579:
2577:
2574:
2572:
2569:
2567:
2564:
2562:
2559:
2557:
2554:
2552:
2549:
2547:
2544:
2542:
2539:
2537:
2534:
2533:
2531:
2524:
2523:
2519:
2515:
2507:
2503:
2499:
2495:
2491:
2487:
2486:
2479:
2474:
2471:
2467:
2463:
2461:
2457:
2453:
2449:
2445:
2439:
2430:
2423:
2421:
2418:
2417:
2413:
2409:
2401:
2399:
2397:
2393:
2389:
2385:
2381:
2370:
2366:
2362:
2358:
2354:
2353:
2352:
2351:
2347:
2343:
2338:
2334:
2327:
2323:
2319:
2314:
2308:
2307:
2304:
2301:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2292:
2288:
2284:
2275:
2269:
2265:
2264:
2260:
2256:
2251:
2244:
2238:
2234:
2230:
2226:
2223:
2222:
2221:
2220:
2217:
2213:
2209:
2205:
2203:
2201:
2198:
2196:
2194:
2192:
2189:
2185:
2182:
2180:
2177:
2173:
2169:
2167:
2163:
2161:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2151:
2147:
2143:
2139:
2135:
2131:
2126:
2122:
2120:
2116:
2109:Article scope
2108:
2106:
2105:
2100:
2095:
2094:
2083:
2079:
2076:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2063:
2057:
2053:
2049:
2045:
2039:
2034:
2029:
2025:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2017:
2013:
2009:
2004:
1998:
1996:
1995:
1990:
1985:
1984:
1973:
1969:
1966:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1953:
1947:
1943:
1939:
1935:
1929:
1924:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1909:
1903:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1893:
1889:
1885:
1880:
1874:
1872:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1858:
1856:
1848:
1846:
1845:
1839:
1832:
1825:
1821:
1818:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1792:
1790:
1786:
1779:
1775:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1765:
1757:
1751:
1747:
1742:
1736:
1734:
1733:
1727:
1720:
1713:
1709:
1706:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1687:
1685:
1681:
1674:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1664:
1656:
1650:
1646:
1641:
1635:
1633:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1616:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1604:
1602:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1584:
1582:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1569:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1544:WP:COMMONNAME
1541:
1537:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1513:
1511:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1416:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1387:Flat-Earthers
1384:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1355:
1350:
1348:
1343:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1304:
1295:
1293:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1282:94.191.166.80
1279:
1272:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1230:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1216:
1212:
1207:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1177:
1175:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1154:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1130:Keep in mind
1125:
1123:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1103:
1099:
1098:interlinked:
1092:
1090:
1087:
1081:
1077:
1074:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1038:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1009:
1006:The link to "
1002:
998:
994:
990:
989:
988:
986:
982:
978:
974:
970:
964:
961:The link to "
956:
952:
948:
944:
939:
938:
937:
935:
931:
927:
926:99.25.206.119
923:
916:
915:
912:
907:
906:
903:
884:
880:
859:
837:
833:
829:
826:
823:
814:
813:
810:
805:
802:
786:
758:
752:
742:
738:
735:
732:
729:
726:
717:
711:
708:
699:
698:isn't used?
685:
665:
653:
651:
650:
647:
643:
639:
631:
629:
626:
625:
622:
617:
616:
612:
606:
604:
602:
598:
594:
590:
581:
579:
575:
571:
570:134.226.1.234
567:
557:
554:
550:
546:
545:
544:
540:
522:
517:
514:
511:
505:
502:
496:
493:
470:
467:
461:
458:
455:
452:
449:
440:
439:
436:
431:
428:
425:
424:
421:
417:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
390:
387:
383:
382:
381:
380:
377:
372:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
344:
343:
342:
338:
334:
328:
322:
320:
318:
314:
310:
306:
300:
298:
294:
293:Whitneygeorge
290:
286:
281:
273:
258:
254:
248:
245:
244:
241:
224:
220:
216:
215:
207:
201:
196:
194:
191:
187:
186:
182:
176:
173:
170:
166:
153:
149:
143:
140:
139:
136:
119:
115:
111:
110:
102:
91:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
37:
27:
23:
18:
17:
2511:
2473:
2465:
2442:— Preceding
2435:
2419:
2405:
2378:— Preceding
2374:
2339:
2335:
2331:
2305:
2302:
2299:
2279:
2248:
2142:anti-gravity
2127:
2123:
2112:
2090:
2087:
2062:source check
2041:
2035:
2032:
2005:
2002:
1980:
1977:
1952:source check
1931:
1925:
1922:
1881:
1878:
1862:Ram nareshji
1859:
1854:
1852:
1829:
1808:
1802:
1793:
1788:
1784:
1782:
1743:
1740:
1717:
1697:
1688:
1683:
1679:
1677:
1642:
1639:
1620:
1608:
1588:
1565:
1536:Dougmcdonell
1521:Dougmcdonell
1517:
1498:
1466:thrill rides
1463:
1424:— Preceding
1420:
1403:JustinTime55
1394:
1390:
1359:— Preceding
1351:
1346:
1339:
1299:
1276:— Preceding
1273:
1269:
1231:
1214:
1213:of at least
1210:
1208:
1196:ion thruster
1191:
1181:
1158:— Preceding
1155:
1129:
1111:
1107:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1088:
1085:
1065:
1044:{{deadlink}}
1005:
960:
920:— Preceding
917:
908:
852:, where the
815:
806:
700:
657:
635:
627:
618:
613:
610:
587:— Preceding
582:
560:
548:
541:
441:
432:
429:
426:
413:
376:85.124.39.23
373:
369:
329:
326:
301:
277:
252:
212:
147:
107:
51:WikiProjects
34:
2250:Swing rides
2166:this (2014)
2159:Terminology
1391:significant
1342:vomit comet
1018:202.9.21.50
1012:—Preceding
967:—Preceding
957:Broken Link
646:SuperMidget
607:Simulations
564:—Preceding
348:Plot device
123:Spaceflight
114:spaceflight
70:Spaceflight
41:Start-class
2530:Categories
2508:technology
2466:References
2099:Report bug
1989:Report bug
1857:category,
1501:Tkmckenzie
1184:good faith
1073:WolfKeeper
621:WolfKeeper
553:WolfKeeper
435:WolfKeeper
2448:Xyzxyz321
2130:free fall
2082:this tool
2075:this tool
1972:this tool
1965:this tool
1902:dead link
1824:this tool
1817:this tool
1805:|checked=
1712:this tool
1705:this tool
1592:Tlhslobus
1215:planetary
1132:WP:BURDEN
1093:Questions
911:Greetasdf
809:Greetasdf
396:Rmvandijk
333:Zelbinian
39:is rated
2456:contribs
2444:unsigned
2392:contribs
2380:unsigned
2172:little g
2138:buoyancy
2088:Cheers.—
1978:Cheers.—
1830:Cheers.—
1756:cbignore
1718:Cheers.—
1655:cbignore
1605:Rotation
1470:Rickyrab
1426:unsigned
1417:Spelling
1383:pedantic
1373:contribs
1361:unsigned
1347:elliptic
1306:Otolith2
1278:unsigned
1160:unsigned
1113:WikiPBia
1037:deadlink
1014:unsigned
981:contribs
969:unsigned
943:Lklundin
922:unsigned
872:and the
589:unsigned
566:unsigned
309:PrimeBOT
2494:MrOllie
2384:Lionjim
2300:Laundry
2012:my edit
1906:tag to
1888:my edit
1840::Online
1785:checked
1750:my edit
1728::Online
1680:checked
1649:my edit
1623:Kortoso
1572:Kortoso
1540:retitle
1514:Gravity
1481:Kortoso
1365:NOrbeck
1252:Tamfang
1246:R3hall
1142:, etc.
1089:- Mike
909:Thanks
801:3.14159
352:Kortoso
289:Cmedvid
255:on the
228:Physics
219:Physics
175:Physics
150:on the
2438:AirSim
2188:WP:UCN
1898:Added
1764:nobots
1663:nobots
1446:BilCat
1236:R3hall
1200:VASIMR
1140:WP:NOR
902:Lilwik
774:Where:
371:_: -->
47:scale.
2303:Pizza
2136:and
640:" to
503:894.6
486:, or
462:29.91
420:Rusco
28:This
2518:talk
2498:talk
2452:talk
2412:talk
2388:talk
2361:talk
2346:talk
2287:talk
2259:talk
2233:talk
2212:(𒁳)
2150:(𒁳)
1866:talk
1809:true
1789:true
1684:true
1627:talk
1596:talk
1576:talk
1552:talk
1525:talk
1505:talk
1485:talk
1450:talk
1434:talk
1407:talk
1369:talk
1326:talk
1310:talk
1286:talk
1256:talk
1240:talk
1224:talk
1168:talk
1148:talk
1136:WP:V
1117:talk
1082:Uses
1052:talk
1022:talk
997:talk
977:talk
973:Tuki
947:talk
930:talk
759:9.81
597:talk
574:talk
400:talk
356:talk
346:See
337:talk
313:talk
2229:N2e
2225:dab
2208:dab
2146:dab
2121:).
2056:RfC
2026:to
1946:RfC
1916:to
1807:to
1776:to
1548:N2e
1472:.
1322:N2e
1220:N2e
1048:N2e
993:N2e
307:by
247:Mid
142:Mid
2532::
2520:)
2500:)
2458:)
2454:•
2414:)
2394:)
2390:•
2363:)
2348:)
2320:)
2317:c̄
2306:03
2289:)
2261:)
2235:)
2206:--
2132:,
2069:.
2064:}}
2060:{{
1959:.
1954:}}
1950:{{
1904:}}
1900:{{
1868:)
1762:{{
1758:}}
1754:{{
1661:{{
1657:}}
1653:{{
1629:)
1598:)
1578:)
1554:)
1527:)
1507:)
1487:)
1452:)
1436:)
1409:)
1375:)
1371:•
1328:)
1312:)
1288:)
1258:)
1242:)
1226:)
1170:)
1150:)
1138:,
1119:)
1054:)
1040:}}
1034:{{
1024:)
999:)
983:)
979:•
949:)
932:)
799:=
787:π
743:30
730:×
727:π
686:⋅
666:×
599:)
576:)
402:)
374:--
358:)
350:.
339:)
315:)
299:.
295:,
2516:(
2496:(
2450:(
2410:(
2386:(
2359:(
2344:(
2312:d
2309:(
2285:(
2257:(
2231:(
2113:"
2101:)
2097:(
2084:.
2077:.
1991:)
1987:(
1974:.
1967:.
1864:(
1826:.
1819:.
1800:N
1714:.
1707:.
1695:Y
1625:(
1594:(
1574:(
1570:.
1550:(
1523:(
1503:(
1483:(
1448:(
1432:(
1405:(
1367:(
1324:(
1308:(
1284:(
1254:(
1238:(
1222:(
1166:(
1146:(
1115:(
1050:(
1020:(
995:(
975:(
945:(
928:(
885:2
881:c
860:m
838:2
834:c
830:m
827:=
824:e
753:2
749:)
739:m
736:p
733:r
721:(
718:R
712:=
709:g
595:(
572:(
523:2
518:M
515:P
512:R
506:g
497:=
494:r
471:r
468:g
459:=
456:M
453:P
450:R
398:(
354:(
335:(
311:(
259:.
154:.
53::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
