Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Archbasilica of Saint John Lateran

Source 📝

1664:
no longer an offical name. Yet it is almost always as in this article in practice referred to as St. John's which would be incorrect or at least no longer correct. I heard somewhere, (no, i don't remember where, hence I was looking it up here) that it is the Basilica of Our Saviour & Cathedral of St. John's Lateran BUT NOT Baslica of St. John's or the Cathedral of Our Saviour. The only similar arrangement I know of is that in Monreal the same church is both the Basilica of Mary Queen of the World and the Cathedral of St. James the Greater. (editing my own comment per teh wikipedia article on same the Montreal Cathedral is Mary Queen of teh World completely replacing the St. James nae, so this doesn't help with St. John's/Our Saviour If someone could make quite explicitly clear the status of this church's name or names, I'd appreciate it.
1603: 1096:"? Should the name of the church itself be in English? I think usage varies. But English speakers certainly know the four major basilicas in Rome best by the English form of their names, which they often use without expressing the word "basilica" or "church", saying: "Saint Peter's", "Saint Mary Major's", "Saint Paul's outside (or without) the Walls". When those who built the American Episcopal church in Rome called it "Saint Paul's within the Walls", they were obviously thinking of this last name in its English form, not of "San Paolo fuori le Mura". 590:
disagree since the real meaning of the word(s) is basically the same. "Holy" Peter, is no different from "Saint" Peter! At least in my opinion. Perhaps it is in the vein of comparing a "place, or thing" to a person, but in the long run the sentiment remains the same, I.e. "venerate" "Definition of VENERATE. 1: to regard with reverential respect or with admiring deference . 2: to honor (as an icon or a relic) with a ritual act of devotion" To me it makes little if no difference. Regards, Ronald L. Hughes
1966:
solemnity. In the former calendar it was a double of the second class. In today's calendar it is a feast. The confusion may have arisen from the fact that IN THE CHURCH ITSELF, the date of dedication (as well as the feast day of the patron saint) is celebrated as a solemnity. This applies to cathedrals, basilicas, and parish churches. Likewise, these two occasions with respect to the cathedral are celebrated as solemnities throughout the diocese. I have changed the text to reflect his fact.
31: 236: 215: 751:" is nonsense. The basilica system came much later than the origins of the church; the first is an (abbreviated) Latin name translated by the second; and most importantly, the phrase, as written, implied, that the church is no longer called that: but in fact it is, that's the current official name of the church (properly, Archibasilica Sanctissimi Salvatoris: Archbasilica of the Most Holy Savior) — the confession board at the entrance of the church so calls it. 2154: 579:
wanted to use the italian version. also there's no such thing as a "st. savior" as listed under the 'Roman Catholic liturgy' section. the only 'savoir' christians recognized is Christ. and no pope has canonized Him saint yet (that i'm aware of). so its "Holy Savior" no 'and/or' needed. in italian (as in spanish) 'santo' and 'santa' are used for people, places, things, and concepts. in some cases it means 'saint', in others 'holy'. in this case, its 'holy'.
167: 1051: 1431: 1386: 1323: 1221: 974: 945: 430: 409: 341: 320: 921:
number of people of Italian descent who understandably use Italian names. Google searches show that the English name is more common among English speakers worldwide. Sourcebooks use it. It is used all over. Knowledge (XXG) policy is to use most common name (not the version in English!). If the Italian version was most common among worldwide speakers of English then the article would belong there. It isn't so it doesn't.
1893:). In 1905 came the on the Separation of the Churches and the State. Between 1905 & 1957, the president ceased to be an honorary canon (or refused to accept the title or didn't not formally claimed it?? I don't know where to put the nuance - citations needed). I don't think the Popes in their own cathedral ever suspended the title. It should have remained vacant but I might be wrong (here again citations are needed). 91: 64: 2041:
See e.g. the article in the Latin WP. Now Vatican Latin isn't always faultless, but I cannot imagine they would give their main church an official title in pig Latin. In fact, so far I have not found any official source that gives the title in Latin, even though the internet is filled with references to that "official" name in bad Latin, often, no doubt, copied from Knowledge (XXG). Greetings
179: 101: 246: 22: 932:(Italian) because for some reason English speakers refer to them that way. Ditto with Spanish monarchs. The same is true of locations. Just because most Roman basilicas are recognised (in so far as they are recognised at all) though Italian names does not mean that St. John Lateran must also be in Italian. We don't use the Italian for St. Peter's Basilica, for example. 1706:
understand the meaning of "gens" as "the family called" such and such. And in this case, it not hard to associate the various variations of "Laterano, Lateran, etc. as merely a spelling version of the word in English "Latin(s)".. It is not a large leap since Latin became the mother language of this very church. Your views are expected. Regards, Ronald L. Hughes
1889:
exists today, and each year celebrates in the basilica a Mass on the day of his birth, December 13. They also granted Henri IV and his successors, the title of honorary canon. The French Revolution put an end to duties got from the abbey in 1791. However, Louis XVIII, Charles X and Napoleon III allocate an annuity payable until 1870. (see
1025:
outside my area of expertise. Still, looking at the religious and art history texts that I have on hand, I see that they use the English name. Since no one can seem to point to much evidence suggesting that the Italian name happens to be the more common usage among English-speakers, this article should be moved back.
1810:
If it is located outside of the boundaries of the Vatican City, shouldn't the location be given as Rome, and not Vatican. You wouldn't describe the Swedish embassy in Rome as being in Sweden, even though it too operates according to the same principle. This Basilica is in Rome, not the Vatican City.
1663:
Forgive my ignorance but the question I can here to clarify isn't really in either the article or the discussion. What it the relationship between the names: St. John & Our Saviour? The article and discusion lead me to think that Basilica of Our Savior at some point replaced St. John's which is
1024:
lays out a set of guidelines under which "article naming should give priority to what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature." The topic of this article is way
578:
someone moved this article to the english title, and you're bent on using the italian name within the article. if you're going to do that, use at least ONLY the italian name, and not a combination of both. there's still 9 "st. john"s in the article. you could have done a quick find-and-replace if you
1888:
The story is old: Louis XI in 1482 granted the chapter managing the Church of St. John Lateran in Rome with the rights over the abbey Clairac. Some years after his conversion to Catholicism Henri IV confirms these rights in 1604. In recognition, the chapter erected a statue of the King, which still
819:
I'm not the best writer, am I! Yes, a cathedral isn't to be tied to a person, but to the place. Yes yes, I would object to a church being the "cathedral of the Archbishop of..." That church is the cathedral not of the archbishop, but of St. Louis. On the other hand, it's useful to point out that the
777:
As much as I hate to, I just had to see if either Pmadrid/ Bill?, or myself might be more correct concerning his words, thusly "Since Pope is merely a nickname for "Bishop of Rome"...." I might well be wrong, but I think that "Pope" is merely a form of "Papa/Poppa", which is just another way to say
589:
Above respondent named 4.230.153.169 19:36, 15 September 2007 (UTC), wrote; "so its "Holy Savior" no 'and/or' needed. in italian (as in spanish) 'santo' and 'santa' are used for people, places, things, and concepts. in some cases it means 'saint', in others 'holy'. in this case, its 'holy'." I must
2056:
I have studied Latin and Greek for years and I am in total agreement that the grammar of the title, as it currently stands (three years after this comment was left here), is mistaken. I will attempt to find some indication of the Latin name of the basilica and cite it so this erroneous title can be
1745:
as a way of listing all cathedrals in Italy by the name of the city will not work where the article does not include the name of the city: "Basilica of St. John Lateran" can be sorted under R for Rome, but the relevant city is not obvious to someone reading the Category page. Using a redirect page
1705:
Dear user Gugganij! Iguess the larger question is just what did the word or prepostion, etc. actually mean in the original inscription? Does it mean "of" or merely an abbreviation of the English words "in the", etc.? Actually I could make a large jump and inquire about the original "Gens" or as I
1354:
Actually I was thinking of that name as the title of the actual article, not just a redirect. I'm still unconfy with "St. John Lateran" without the "in" - it sounds like "St. John Fisher". Maybe the missing "in" was the actual reason for preferring the Italian name. Lateran Basilica also deals with
2040:
I doubt this is the official Latin title, since it contains a number of grammatical errors. In correct Latin, it should be "Ioannis", rather than Iohannes (standard Latin spelling and genitive case), and Baptistae and Evangelistae (again: genitive case; correct in the infobox but not in the text).
1065:
I concur: on the English Wiki the English form should be the default option, if there's no reason for doing otherwise (and the original is Latin anyway). But take care that it's "Saint John in (the) Lateran" and not "St. John Lateran", as if Lateran were John#s family name (not that you would, but
866:(Just noticed this today.) Wetman is right on this; I was mistaken. I do stick by my edit, though — no accounting for human stubbornness! — on the grounds of simplicity. The technically correct form is as Wetman says, but might as well kept the almost universal shorthand, "cathedral of Placename". 766:
Agree with 1-4, though number 5 doesn't make much sense. The office of Pope is exactly the same as the office of Bishop of Rome. The ecumenical powers that the Pope exercises are tied to the Roman see. Thus, if the Pope resigned the episcopate of Rome, he would cease to be Pope. Since Pope is
732:
articles. What is "great" about these is their canonical status in the modern Catholic Church; as ancient Roman edifices, they were insignificant or late, qualifying rather as paleochristian. Furthermore, there are many churches in Rome that date back to ancient Rome, including some that are also
1965:
In the liturgical calendar revised after Vatican II, the former complex system of ranking feasts has been simplified. In order of importance today from most to least: solemnity, feast, obligatory memorial, and optional memorial. The feast day of the Basilica of St. John Lateran has never been a
920:
The basilica, unusually among Roman basilicas, is not widely known by Italian name but by its English translation. (The others simply aren't widely known.) Only in American English is there much usage in English of the Italian name, and that is probably because the US after Italy has the highest
1406:, the people talking about those monuments are most likely going to be following traditional nomenclature. By and large I'm an evolutionist in language matters, but there's no point in artificially speeding up the decay. (And no, "St. Mary Major" shouldn't call to mind St. Mary Magdalen....) 1401:
While it's true that languages evolve, and often on the principle of "bad money drives out good", i.e., uneducated and popular forms eventually win out, especially when assisted by analogy or simplicity, over the originally correct form — in the case of the English names of monuments in Rome
2178:– The inconsistency between "St" and "St." is a never-ending nuisance. Since we don't need to save ink on Knowledge (XXG), we may as well just go simple. More than one inlink seem to support this rendering. Terribly sorry if we've been over this before. As a minor detail this would be per 1019:
Support move per reasons clearly spelled out by FearÉIREANN. It is essential that an encyclopedia, any kind of sourebook, or a news agency follow a set of standardized naming and style conventions. Knowledge (XXG) clearly has a very long way to go in that regard; but correcting any single
1736:
Excluding the actual article from the category is unacceptable, because the category mechanism is intended to be two-way, ie to allow navigation from article to category as well as from category to article. Removing this article from Category:Cathedrals in Italy breaks one half of this
1902:
decided to go back to Rome and accept the title during a formal ceremony. He was followed by Charles de Gaulle, Valéry Giscard d'Estaing, Jacques Chirac and Nicolas Sarkozy. Not by Georges Pompidou, or François Mitterrand, who do not reject the title but did not formally accepted it
797:
article that it is the cathedral of the Archbishop of St. Louis, would you object to that as well? I.e. is your objection one of tying the cathedral to the person instead of the particular church? If so, I think that's understandable, but it is notable to point out that the Pope's
1746:
for the sort is a partial workaround for this. A better workaround, if sorting cathedrals by cityname is really important, is to create a page with a table with, say, the name of the cathedral, the diocese, the city, the relevant saint, the current bishop, etc. There is already
1079:
anything". They may call some Italian churches or basilicas by the Italian name, but always with "of", never with "di". If the other articles mentioned by Gerald Farinas do in fact have "di", they should all be corrected. For instance, who really says in English: "the Basilica
1843:). 2. By international law, extraterritorial areas (e.g. embassies) remain being part of the host country's territory (in this case Italy). Therefore, all papal basilicas (with the obvious exception of Saint Peter's) are on Italian soil. I changed the article accordingly. 1521:
In attempting to use Knowledge (XXG) to label my own Rome photos, I realized that a photo on this page is mislabeled. The one labeled "Triclinium of Leo III" does depict not a triclinium at all. It is an apse, apparently called a tribune, with copies of the mosaics
2074:
The Etymology chapter is kind of a tautology. The chapter should be removed or substantially changed pointing to an explanation of what Laterano means (Horti Laterani, a land parcel owned by the Roman family of the Plauzi Laterani). Something more can be found
1618:
says that the inscription is "at the base of the columns on either side of the central entrance door", and reads "SACROS LATERAN ECCLES OMNIUM URBIS ET ORBIS ECCLESIARUM MATER ET CAPUT". Which of these is correct, or are both correct?
558:
I wish I'd seen this when posted. In the case of St. John Lateran, it's just plain not true; Knowledge (XXG) looks very pedantic for the move. And "Basilica. . . ." is almost never used in speech, and infrequently in writing, to precede
1740:
It is a deficiency of the current Category system that, while categories can be sorted by a specified alias, the name listed in the category is the article name and not the sorting alias. Thus, in this case, attempting to use
2017:"Several months later on a sleepy summer night in Rome, bombs placed by the Mafia exploded in two churches in Rome, including the Basilica of St John in Lateran, the pope's cathedral in his capacity as bishop of Rome." - 1928:
What is the basis for what you just wrote? What sources did you use for that? I'd say that whatever sources you used for that would be fine for adding this material to the article until better sources can be found.
1122:. While an Italian-speaker would look for the church as now titled, why would she be doing so on English Wiki rather than on Italian Wiki? And to the rest of us mortals, the almost universal name for the church is 1142:
alternative names and would make sure that alternative names point to the entry, but would call the entry by the phrase used most often in the English speaking world to refer to the basilica. Makes perfect sense.
2253:
Is the church named after a saint named St John Lateran? Or is it named after St John the Apostle, with Lateran(us) being just the name of the building, and the ancient Roman family who originally owned it?
549:
These examples establishes precedence to move this article to the proper title, "Basilica di San Giovanni in Laterno" with a redirect from its lesser used (outside the United States) English translation.
2187: 1908: 1264:". Italian and German use the preposition "in"; French and Spanish (Saint-Jean de Latran, San Juan de Letrán) use "de" (of); but the centuries-old English usage employs no preposition whatever. 1985:
I am pretty sure that either the Lateran Basilica or the Lateran Palace (next door) or both were bombed by the mafia in response to John Paul II's anti-mafia statments. Should a section be added
1638: 2284: 2183: 506:
The other articles on Italian basilicas use their proper Italian names because they are known moreso by their Italian names (outside the United States), even by English-speaking people:
2306:
It is stated in the article about the Curia Julia that the bronze doors in this basilica are from the Curia Julia, but I have not found the corresponding information in this article.
924:
BTW WP does not always put a set of names in the one linguistic format. If some in a list are known in the native language and some in English, it follows that usage. So we have
733:
canonically basilicas in the Catholic sense (S. Agnese in Agone, S. Clemente, etc.); and at least one salient example that is a basilica in the architectural sense (S. Sabina).
2371: 1869:
The President of the French Republic is ex officio the "first and only honorary canon" of the basilica, a title inherited from the Kings of France who held it since Henri IV.
1276:
Ah ha I see, because when I do a search on Google (yes I know, not the annoying Google search again but sometimes useful for orientation purposes) i get 23,600 hits for the
1637:
account is a simple transcription of the inscription in abbreviated form. The full version is easier to read and should be preferred in my opinion. It appears for instance
754:
5. "cathedral of the popes" is not as informative as it could be, and, again, somewhat misleading. Properly, it's the cathedral of Rome; the popes are the bishops of Rome.
391: 2116: 1535:
Just thought I'd explain myself before I edit. And all because I am trying to be too anal in labeling my some thousand Italy photos (at this rate, I'll never finish). —
2426: 381: 302: 157: 515: 2416: 2396: 2386: 1943:
BTW, did French presidents between 1871 and 1905 (i.e. Thiers, Mac-Mahon, Grévy, Carnot, Casimir-Perier, Faure, and Loubet) have any connection with the title?
292: 197: 147: 1108:
We commonly use the anglicized name in English. Basilica of Saint John Lateran. I know there is a concern about "of the" but the use is commonly John Lateran.
2431: 1747: 2361: 2356: 357: 2406: 535: 268: 123: 1873:
Would this hold true if the President of the French Republic were not a Catholic? Or would some other French official hold the position in his place?
2401: 2421: 484: 35: 2376: 2366: 348: 325: 1602: 778:"father!" "Pape/Pappe'/Padre, etc.", may also be correct in some documents? Probably nothing to really worry about? Regards, Ronald L. Hughes 2411: 2381: 718:". I've never seen or heard that, not once. It is usually referred to as "St. John Lateran", or, in full, "the Basilica of St. John Lateran". 2441: 2391: 1793: 1730:<!--]: IMPORTANT NOTE: THE CATEGORY LINK IS LOCATED AT ], in order to achieve a correct listing by city names in the category page.--: --> 474: 259: 220: 114: 69: 728:". An "ancient Roman basilica" is something totally different from a Catholic basilica dating back to ancient Roman times: see the various 660: 543: 192: 74: 2100:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1183:
Not because I object to using the english name, however the name that is proposed is wrong in my opinion. Isn't it "Basilica of St. John
2446: 2310: 1818: 1707: 1187:
Lateran" or something similar to that? I think we need to have a discussion first on the correct english naming, anyone please comment.
779: 591: 2175: 2161: 1989: 1671: 1464:
The following text has been deleted from the article, perhaps in error: "Twice the Lateran Palace and basilica have been rededicated.
531: 519: 1914:
It should be worth adding a section to the current article but I can't find reliable academic sources to back it. What do you think?
450: 1835:
I agree. Two points: 1. The Lateran Treaties stipulate that certain areas in and outside Rome are extraterritorial property of the
2171: 523: 507: 767:
merely a nickname for "Bishop of Rome", the terms "Cathedral of the Bishop of Rome" and "Cathedral of the Pope" are equivalent.
2351: 794: 539: 1021: 44: 2436: 1260:(at least the European edition) there is a photograph of some homeless people who yesterday "öccupied Rome's biggest church, 1002: 2277: 437: 414: 2292: 1742: 925: 2227: 2091: 1450:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
896:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
651:
The family were Laterani not Laterni. Why is this a voting issue? What if a bunch of people "voted" for Laterno? --
2134: 1971: 1037: 1798: 1485: 1530:(see that article, last paragraph of text, for a good description). Also found some other links identifying it. 449:
history on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1492:. The church became the most important shrine in honor of the two saints, not often jointly venerated (but see 527: 2239: 2179: 2101: 737: 50: 2273:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
2314: 2288: 2008: 1993: 1822: 1772: 1711: 1581:
either. The naive text that accompanies the illustration here might be replaced with a condensed version of
1057: 783: 595: 1814: 1667: 1675: 1469: 1144: 184: 2235: 2076: 1967: 1948: 1934: 1904: 1878: 1034: 580: 356:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
267:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
122:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1334:
Another name that's used (though I don't know how common it is in English) is simply Lateran Basilica.
2333: 2329: 2213: 1919: 1788: 21: 2259: 2104:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1783: 1345: 1306:
version just shows yet again the amount of bullshit google searches throws up (another case of the
1126:. I'd even drop the "Basilica of" — there's only one in the world: "Lateran" identifies the place. 985: 929: 683: 551: 511: 251: 106: 2337: 2318: 2296: 2263: 2217: 2199: 2141: 2063: 2050: 2027: 2012: 1997: 1975: 1952: 1938: 1923: 1882: 1852: 1826: 1804: 1776: 1757: 1715: 1699: 1679: 1652: 1623: 1589: 1568: 1553: 1539: 1511: 1437: 1410: 1392: 1359: 1348: 1338: 1329: 1290: 1268: 1248: 1227: 1193: 1167: 1159: 1147: 1130: 1114: 1100: 1070: 1060: 1039: 1029: 1014: 1006: 988: 980: 951: 914: 870: 849: 824: 810: 787: 771: 760: 599: 583: 571: 2042: 2025: 2004: 1848: 1695: 1565: 1550: 1536: 1112: 1054: 999: 235: 214: 2018: 1688:
Arcibasilica del Santissimo Salvatore e dei Santi Giovanni Battista ed Evangelista in Laterano
1647: 1430: 1385: 1322: 1220: 973: 944: 906: 842: 2195: 2046: 1944: 1930: 1874: 1465: 1435: 1407: 1390: 1327: 1245: 1225: 1127: 1050: 978: 949: 867: 821: 757: 568: 2209: 1915: 1754: 1285: 1188: 1011: 802:
is in the Lateran and that, historically, it was his principal church and is now his seat
793:
Hang on, I think I misunderstood your #5. Here's an experiment. If I were to say in the
736:
3. An enumeration of the other four is not needed, and is taken care of by a link to the
1280:
version, and 57,500 for the without version. hm... the (St. John) basilica is after all
429: 408: 166: 2255: 2128: 1620: 1561: 1527: 1481: 1355:
the fact that the basilica was not always dedicated to St. John. Please consider this.
340: 319: 2308:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Curia_Julia#/media/File:Ancient_Roman_Senate_Bronze_doors.jpg
1641:, offered by French President Charles De Gaulle as an honorary canon of the basilica. 682:
I moved the page. I had to delete the already existing redirect in order to do so. --
2345: 2269:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
2022: 1911:, (see President Sarkozy's polemic speech that followed his "installation" as canon). 1844: 1767:
Is this in Italy or in the Holy See? Can someone please specify this in the article?
1691: 1156: 1109: 994: 910: 353: 1208:
may be the literally correct translation but it isn't used in that form in English.
2059: 1840: 1642: 1582: 1578: 1489: 1473: 1356: 1335: 1164: 1067: 807: 768: 722: 610:
Laterno doesn't exist; the name of basilica is Basilica di San Giovanni in Laterano
446: 264: 119: 1899: 1782:
The church is located outside Vatican City's boundaries but with the principle of
1612:
Sacrosancta Lateranensis ecclesia omnium urbis et orbis ecclesiarum mater et caput
639:
Even with a google search you get much more hits with LATERANO than with LATERNO.
2191: 1890: 1768: 1586: 1508: 1497: 1419: 1374: 1311: 1209: 962: 933: 846: 698: 672: 664: 652: 640: 630: 1418:
Given 100% support in voting for the renaming, the renaming has now been done.
623:
The correct name is San Giovanni in LATERANO not Laterno - St John in LATERAN
546:. Even many American institutions refer to the basilica by its Italian name. 178: 1504: 241: 174: 96: 90: 63: 1560:
Does anybody think this picture needs to be also (or perhaps instead) in the
1531: 2122: 1507:
to the two saints." The text appears informative and essentially correct. --
1503:
was established at the Lateran Palace, devoted to serving the basilica as a
1500: 1477: 1265: 1097: 837:
The cathedral is the seat of the bishop of the diocese, not as a person but
100: 629:
Italian name is LATERANO, not LATERNO. AFAIK Laterno hasn't got any sense.
1044:
As much as I usually am in favour of using domestic names, in this case I
721:
2. It is thoroughly misleading to state that it is one of "the five great
659:
just searching a clear consensus; I can't move the page, probably because
1836: 1533: 1026: 729: 725: 2003:
Not unless you can verify the event. "Pretty sure " is not good enough.
245: 1634: 1630: 1615: 1493: 845:, for one example: the cathedra is not inherently tied to the place. -- 1601: 1585:, to the general improvement of this somewhat eroding article. -- 1444:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
890:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal.
442: 441:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of 2188:
Talk:Cathedral of Saint Elias and Saint Gregory the Illuminator
1909:
1905 French law on the Separation of the Churches and the State
2148: 15: 2328:
Marble, granite and cement; or marble, granite and concrete?
1610:
In the Lateran Palace section this article states "the words
1549:
article. Still, I think the picture needs a better caption. —
2307: 2234:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
165: 1891:
http://fr.wikipedia.org/Archibasilique_Saint-Jean-de-Latran
1020:
non-standard page is always a step in the right direction.
2184:
Cathedral of Saint Elias and Saint Gregory the Illuminator
2019:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39484767/ns/world_news-europe/
820:
Lateran is the pope's church: your edit does the trick.
1577:
The illustration of the "Holy Steps" does not show the
1075:
English speakers surely never talk about "the Basilica
1298:
It may well be, but it is not called that, simply the
1284:
the Lateran, which is the name of the place, correct?
2226:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1907:). It is a very sensitive political matter since the 547: 352:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 263:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 118:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2242:. No further edits should be made to this section. 1526:Leo III's triclinium (dining room) in the ancient 1369:in never used in English name. The name is simply 1545:I suppose it would help if I would actually read 1614:are incised in the main door". But the article 2121: 1155:using the most widely recognized English name. 516:Basilica della Santissima Annunziata di Firenze 2372:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in Arts 2283:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 671:Ok, so if nobody opposes I can move the page! 1484:dedicated the Lateran Palace and basilica to 8: 1748:List of the Roman Catholic dioceses in Italy 1496:, Santa Croce, Florence). In later years, a 1302:. The fact that 23,600 hits show up for the 1048:be in favour of the Italian variant, sorry. 841:. Cathedral churches have been shifted: see 1633:version is at the base of the columns. The 1476:in honor of the newly consecrated basilica 2090:The following is a closed discussion of a 1750:which might be expanded in this direction. 714:1. Stated that it is "known in English as 536:Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari 403: 366:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Historic sites 314: 209: 58: 1725:I have defied the following instruction: 1686:The full official name is (in Italian): 277:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Architecture 132:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Christianity 2427:High-importance Historic sites articles 567:, and most of the others in that list. 405: 316: 211: 60: 19: 2362:Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Arts 2357:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles 2160:The request to rename this article to 1898:It is only in 1957 that the President 1200:The English language version used in 7: 2417:Top-importance Architecture articles 2397:High-importance Catholicism articles 2387:Mid-importance Christianity articles 2109:The result of the move request was: 661:Basilica di San Giovanni in Laterano 544:Basilica di Santa Maria della Salute 435:This article is within the scope of 346:This article is within the scope of 257:This article is within the scope of 112:This article is within the scope of 2432:WikiProject Historic sites articles 369:Template:WikiProject Historic sites 49:It is of interest to the following 2176:Archbasilica of Saint John Lateran 2162:Archbasilica of Saint John Lateran 1022:Knowledge (XXG):Naming conventions 532:Basilica di Santa Croce di Firenze 520:Basilica di San Lorenzo di Firenze 14: 2407:WikiProject Christianity articles 697:Good, I have erased the warning. 280:Template:WikiProject Architecture 135:Template:WikiProject Christianity 2402:WikiProject Catholicism articles 2172:Archbasilica of St. John Lateran 2152: 1429: 1384: 1321: 1244:) is the standard English form. 1219: 1049: 972: 943: 524:Basilica di San Miniato al Monte 508:Basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore 459:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Rome 428: 407: 339: 318: 244: 234: 213: 177: 99: 89: 62: 29: 20: 2422:B-Class Historic sites articles 1365:The problem is simply that the 795:Cathedral Basilica of St. Louis 749:Archbasilica of the Holy Savior 540:Basilica di Santa Maria Novella 479:This article has been rated as 386:This article has been rated as 297:This article has been rated as 152:This article has been rated as 2377:B-Class vital articles in Arts 2367:B-Class level-5 vital articles 2117:closed by non-admin page mover 1716:00:54, 13 September 2013 (UTC) 901:The result of the debate was: 584:19:36, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 1: 2412:B-Class Architecture articles 2382:B-Class Christianity articles 2297:02:40, 18 February 2023 (UTC) 1659:Still confused about the name 1569:05:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC) 1554:05:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC) 1540:05:39, 10 December 2006 (UTC) 1438:00:24, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 1411:00:14, 12 December 2005 (UTC) 1393:00:06, 12 December 2005 (UTC) 1360:23:45, 11 December 2005 (UTC) 1344:We can make that a redirect. 1088:", rather than "the basilica 453:and see a list of open tasks. 360:and see a list of open tasks. 271:and see a list of open tasks. 190:This article is supported by 126:and see a list of open tasks. 2442:Top-importance Rome articles 2392:B-Class Catholicism articles 2186:, as recently emphasised by 2064:14:53, 2 November 2017 (UTC) 1976:10:13, 9 November 2009 (UTC) 1805:07:41, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 1786:, the Vatican controls it. – 1777:22:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC) 1743:Category:Cathedrals in Italy 1721:Category:Cathedrals in Italy 1690:. I added the missing bits. 1680:17:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 1349:03:23, 8 December 2005 (UTC) 1339:03:06, 8 December 2005 (UTC) 1330:19:09, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 1291:19:01, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 1269:12:55, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 1258:International Herald Tribune 1249:00:02, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 1228:22:44, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 1194:22:27, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 1168:01:23, 7 December 2005 (UTC) 1160:00:49, 7 December 2005 (UTC) 1148:08:12, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 1131:14:13, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 1115:13:06, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 1101:10:56, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 1071:09:48, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 1061:09:12, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 1040:08:26, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 1030:07:15, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 1015:06:23, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 1007:06:14, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 989:05:30, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 981:05:16, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 952:05:16, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 926:Victor Emmanuel III of Italy 871:14:19, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 850:22:55, 22 October 2005 (UTC) 825:20:11, 22 October 2005 (UTC) 811:19:49, 22 October 2005 (UTC) 772:19:38, 22 October 2005 (UTC) 761:11:14, 15 October 2005 (UTC) 572:11:14, 15 October 2005 (UTC) 2083:Requested move 22 June 2019 2028:16:10, 3 October 2010 (UTC) 1953:02:12, 19 August 2009 (UTC) 1939:02:11, 19 August 2009 (UTC) 1924:08:27, 18 August 2009 (UTC) 1916:Alberto Fernandez Fernandez 1883:22:58, 17 August 2009 (UTC) 1758:17:52, 27 August 2008 (UTC) 1653:21:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 1590:10:45, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 915:18:36, 8 January 2006 (UTC) 788:22:56, 30 August 2013 (UTC) 716:Saint John Lateran Basilica 600:23:10, 30 August 2013 (UTC) 2463: 2447:All WikiProject Rome pages 2319:06:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC) 1700:23:57, 6 August 2008 (UTC) 1066:I've just read it above). 485:project's importance scale 392:project's importance scale 349:WikiProject Historic sites 303:project's importance scale 158:project's importance scale 2218:13:32, 26 June 2019 (UTC) 2200:12:39, 22 June 2019 (UTC) 2142:18:37, 29 June 2019 (UTC) 2013:12:49, 16 June 2010 (UTC) 1998:19:15, 15 June 2010 (UTC) 1827:14:03, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 1624:04:27, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 1512:03:33, 8 April 2006 (UTC) 1486:Saint John the Evangelist 667:21:08, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) 554:02:14, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC) 478: 462:Template:WikiProject Rome 423: 385: 334: 296: 229: 173: 151: 84: 57: 2338:16:21, 9 June 2024 (UTC) 2264:07:41, 22 May 2020 (UTC) 2232:Please do not modify it. 2097:Please do not modify it. 2051:14:51, 7 July 2014 (UTC) 1853:21:10, 15 May 2012 (UTC) 1598:Inscription and location 1447:Please do not modify it. 893:Please do not modify it. 738:Category:Major Basilicas 701:00:29, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) 686:21:00, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) 675:20:47, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) 655:18:34, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) 643:14:19, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) 633:10:53, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) 528:Basilica di San Zanipolo 260:WikiProject Architecture 115:WikiProject Christianity 883:Requested move (Dec 05) 372:Historic sites articles 193:WikiProject Catholicism 2352:B-Class vital articles 2278:Lateran Obelisk HD.jpg 2036:"Official" Latin title 1871: 1607: 1470:Saint John the Baptist 1310:fiasco, methinks!!!). 928:(English) followed by 743:4. "Originally called 185:Catholic Church portal 170: 2437:B-Class Rome articles 2164:has been carried out. 2079:, but is in Italian. 1867: 1605: 1256:On page 3 of today's 663:exists as a redirect 283:Architecture articles 169: 138:Christianity articles 43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 36:level-5 vital article 605:(old) Requested move 1961:Solemnity vs. Feast 1861:President of France 1784:extraterritoriality 1517:Misidentified photo 1236:And I confirm that 930:Umberto II of Italy 745:Basilica Salvatoris 512:Basilica Palladiana 252:Architecture portal 107:Christianity portal 2289:Community Tech bot 1608: 1468:dedicated them to 565:S. Maria dei Frari 171: 45:content assessment 2249:Who is the saint? 2182:with for example 2169: 2168: 2120: 2070:Etymology chapter 1905:Article in French 1817:comment added by 1682: 1670:comment added by 1651: 1005: 843:Bishopric of Sion 710:Opening paragraph 561:S. Maria Maggiore 499: 498: 495: 494: 491: 490: 402: 401: 398: 397: 313: 312: 309: 308: 208: 207: 204: 203: 2454: 2156: 2155: 2149: 2140: 2137: 2131: 2125: 2114: 2099: 1968:Caeruleancentaur 1839:(and not of the 1829: 1801: 1796: 1791: 1731: 1665: 1645: 1466:Pope Sergius III 1449: 1433: 1427: 1388: 1382: 1325: 1319: 1300:St. John Lateran 1288: 1262:St. John Lateran 1238:St. John Lateran 1223: 1217: 1202:St. John Lateran 1191: 1124:St. John Lateran 1053: 998: 976: 970: 947: 941: 895: 502:Name Translation 467: 466: 463: 460: 457: 438:WikiProject Rome 432: 425: 424: 419: 411: 404: 374: 373: 370: 367: 364: 343: 336: 335: 330: 322: 315: 285: 284: 281: 278: 275: 254: 249: 248: 238: 231: 230: 225: 217: 210: 187: 182: 181: 140: 139: 136: 133: 130: 109: 104: 103: 93: 86: 85: 80: 77: 66: 59: 42: 33: 32: 25: 24: 16: 2462: 2461: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2342: 2341: 2326: 2304: 2285:nomination page 2271: 2251: 2246: 2153: 2135: 2129: 2123: 2095: 2085: 2072: 2038: 1983: 1963: 1863: 1812: 1799: 1794: 1789: 1765: 1729: 1723: 1661: 1606:The inscription 1600: 1519: 1462: 1454: 1445: 1420: 1375: 1371:St John Lateran 1312: 1308:Charles Windsor 1286: 1210: 1189: 1176: 1145:Used2BAnonymous 963: 959: 934: 891: 885: 712: 617: 607: 504: 464: 461: 458: 455: 454: 417: 388:High-importance 371: 368: 365: 362: 361: 329:High‑importance 328: 282: 279: 276: 273: 272: 250: 243: 223: 198:High-importance 183: 176: 137: 134: 131: 128: 127: 105: 98: 78: 72: 40: 30: 12: 11: 5: 2460: 2458: 2450: 2449: 2444: 2439: 2434: 2429: 2424: 2419: 2414: 2409: 2404: 2399: 2394: 2389: 2384: 2379: 2374: 2369: 2364: 2359: 2354: 2344: 2343: 2325: 2322: 2303: 2300: 2281: 2280: 2270: 2267: 2250: 2247: 2245: 2244: 2228:requested move 2222: 2221: 2220: 2180:WP:CONSISTENCY 2167: 2166: 2157: 2145: 2107: 2106: 2092:requested move 2086: 2084: 2081: 2071: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2037: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2030: 1982: 1979: 1962: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1941: 1912: 1895: 1894: 1862: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1808: 1807: 1764: 1763:Which country? 1761: 1752: 1751: 1738: 1733: 1732: 1722: 1719: 1703: 1702: 1660: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1599: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1572: 1571: 1562:Lateran Palace 1557: 1556: 1548: 1528:Lateran Palace 1525: 1518: 1515: 1494:Peruzzi Chapel 1482:Pope Lucius II 1461: 1458: 1456: 1453: 1452: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1396: 1395: 1352: 1351: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1231: 1230: 1197: 1196: 1175: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1162: 1150: 1133: 1117: 1103: 1073: 1063: 1042: 1032: 1017: 1009: 991: 983: 958: 955: 918: 899: 898: 886: 884: 881: 880: 879: 878: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 857: 856: 855: 854: 853: 852: 830: 829: 828: 827: 814: 813: 775: 774: 711: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 690: 689: 688: 687: 684:Gerald Farinas 677: 676: 657: 656: 645: 644: 634: 624: 616: 613: 612: 611: 606: 603: 587: 586: 575: 574: 552:Gerald Farinas 503: 500: 497: 496: 493: 492: 489: 488: 481:Top-importance 477: 471: 470: 468: 451:the discussion 433: 421: 420: 418:Top‑importance 412: 400: 399: 396: 395: 384: 378: 377: 375: 363:Historic sites 358:the discussion 354:historic sites 344: 332: 331: 326:Historic sites 323: 311: 310: 307: 306: 299:Top-importance 295: 289: 288: 286: 269:the discussion 256: 255: 239: 227: 226: 224:Top‑importance 218: 206: 205: 202: 201: 189: 188: 172: 162: 161: 154:Mid-importance 150: 144: 143: 141: 124:the discussion 111: 110: 94: 82: 81: 79:Mid‑importance 67: 55: 54: 48: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2459: 2448: 2445: 2443: 2440: 2438: 2435: 2433: 2430: 2428: 2425: 2423: 2420: 2418: 2415: 2413: 2410: 2408: 2405: 2403: 2400: 2398: 2395: 2393: 2390: 2388: 2385: 2383: 2380: 2378: 2375: 2373: 2370: 2368: 2365: 2363: 2360: 2358: 2355: 2353: 2350: 2349: 2347: 2340: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2323: 2321: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2311:31.211.201.66 2309: 2301: 2299: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2279: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2268: 2266: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2248: 2243: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2224: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2165: 2163: 2158: 2151: 2150: 2147: 2144: 2143: 2138: 2132: 2126: 2118: 2112: 2105: 2103: 2098: 2093: 2088: 2087: 2082: 2080: 2078: 2069: 2065: 2062: 2061: 2057:corrected. — 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2035: 2029: 2026: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2005:Laurel Lodged 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1986: 1980: 1978: 1977: 1973: 1969: 1960: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1910: 1906: 1901: 1897: 1896: 1892: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1870: 1866: 1860: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1819:83.147.129.95 1816: 1806: 1803: 1802: 1797: 1792: 1785: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1762: 1760: 1759: 1756: 1749: 1744: 1739: 1735: 1734: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1720: 1718: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1708:96.19.159.196 1701: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1658: 1654: 1649: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1622: 1617: 1613: 1604: 1597: 1591: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1570: 1567: 1566:LonelyPilgrim 1563: 1559: 1558: 1555: 1552: 1551:LonelyPilgrim 1546: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1538: 1537:LonelyPilgrim 1534: 1532: 1529: 1523: 1516: 1514: 1513: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1459: 1457: 1451: 1448: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1426: 1425: 1412: 1409: 1405: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1394: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1381: 1380: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1358: 1350: 1347: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1337: 1332: 1331: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1318: 1317: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1292: 1289: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1250: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1229: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1216: 1215: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1195: 1192: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1166: 1163: 1161: 1158: 1154: 1151: 1149: 1146: 1141: 1137: 1134: 1132: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1118: 1116: 1113: 1111: 1107: 1104: 1102: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1078: 1074: 1072: 1069: 1064: 1062: 1059: 1056: 1052: 1047: 1043: 1041: 1038: 1036: 1033: 1031: 1028: 1023: 1018: 1016: 1013: 1010: 1008: 1004: 1001: 997: 996: 992: 990: 987: 984: 982: 979: 975: 971: 969: 968: 961: 960: 956: 954: 953: 950: 946: 942: 940: 939: 931: 927: 922: 917: 916: 912: 908: 904: 897: 894: 888: 887: 882: 872: 869: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 851: 848: 844: 840: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 826: 823: 818: 817: 816: 815: 812: 809: 805: 801: 796: 792: 791: 790: 789: 785: 781: 780:96.19.159.196 773: 770: 765: 764: 763: 762: 759: 755: 752: 750: 746: 741: 739: 734: 731: 727: 724: 719: 717: 709: 700: 696: 695: 694: 693: 692: 691: 685: 681: 680: 679: 678: 674: 670: 669: 668: 666: 662: 654: 650: 647: 646: 642: 638: 635: 632: 628: 625: 622: 619: 618: 614: 609: 608: 604: 602: 601: 597: 593: 592:96.19.159.196 585: 582: 581:4.230.153.169 577: 576: 573: 570: 566: 562: 557: 556: 555: 553: 548: 545: 541: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 501: 486: 482: 476: 473: 472: 469: 465:Rome articles 452: 448: 447:ancient Roman 444: 440: 439: 434: 431: 427: 426: 422: 416: 413: 410: 406: 393: 389: 383: 380: 379: 376: 359: 355: 351: 350: 345: 342: 338: 337: 333: 327: 324: 321: 317: 304: 300: 294: 291: 290: 287: 270: 266: 262: 261: 253: 247: 242: 240: 237: 233: 232: 228: 222: 219: 216: 212: 199: 196:(assessed as 195: 194: 186: 180: 175: 168: 164: 163: 159: 155: 149: 146: 145: 142: 125: 121: 117: 116: 108: 102: 97: 95: 92: 88: 87: 83: 76: 71: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 46: 38: 37: 27: 23: 18: 17: 2327: 2305: 2282: 2272: 2252: 2231: 2225: 2208:per nom. -- 2205: 2170: 2159: 2146: 2110: 2108: 2096: 2089: 2073: 2058: 2039: 1990:75.36.35.109 1987: 1984: 1964: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1841:Vatican City 1813:— Preceding 1809: 1787: 1766: 1753: 1724: 1704: 1687: 1672:72.16.146.33 1662: 1639:on this vase 1611: 1609: 1583:Scala Sancta 1579:Scala Sancta 1520: 1490:12th century 1474:10th century 1463: 1460:Deleted text 1455: 1446: 1443: 1423: 1421: 1417: 1403: 1378: 1376: 1373:in English. 1370: 1366: 1353: 1333: 1315: 1313: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1297: 1281: 1277: 1261: 1257: 1255: 1241: 1237: 1213: 1211: 1205: 1201: 1184: 1180: 1152: 1139: 1135: 1123: 1119: 1105: 1093: 1092:Santa Croce 1089: 1085: 1084:Santa Croce 1081: 1076: 1045: 993: 966: 964: 937: 935: 923: 919: 903:it was moved 902: 900: 892: 889: 838: 803: 799: 776: 756: 753: 748: 744: 742: 735: 720: 715: 713: 658: 648: 636: 626: 620: 588: 564: 560: 505: 480: 436: 387: 347: 298: 274:Architecture 265:Architecture 258: 221:Architecture 191: 153: 129:Christianity 120:Christianity 113: 70:Christianity 51:WikiProjects 34: 2240:move review 2102:move review 1865:I see that 1737:navigation. 1666:—Preceding 1498:Benedictine 1094:in Florence 75:Catholicism 2346:Categories 2330:Grassynoel 2210:Necrothesp 1755:jnestorius 1564:article? — 1505:devotional 1346:JG of Borg 1287:Gryffindor 1190:Gryffindor 1179:Tentative 1174:Discussion 1086:di Firenze 1012:LuiKhuntek 1003:(contribs) 986:JG of Borg 839:ex officio 2324:Materials 2302:The doors 2256:Koro Neil 2236:talk page 1900:René Coty 1629:IIRC the 1621:Blainster 1501:monastery 1478:baptistry 726:basilicas 39:is rated 2238:or in a 2023:ceejayoz 1845:Gugganij 1837:Holy See 1815:unsigned 1692:Gugganij 1668:unsigned 1404:vel sim. 1157:CDThieme 1110:Dominick 1055:ナイトスタリオン 800:cathedra 730:basilica 2206:Support 1981:Bombing 1643:Jastrow 1635:Lateran 1631:Lateran 1616:Lateran 1488:in the 1472:in the 1424:ÉIREANN 1379:ÉIREANN 1357:Str1977 1336:Str1977 1316:ÉIREANN 1214:ÉIREANN 1181:Support 1165:Pmadrid 1153:Support 1136:Support 1120:Support 1106:Support 1068:Str1977 967:ÉIREANN 938:ÉIREANN 808:Pmadrid 804:de jure 769:Pmadrid 723:ancient 649:Support 637:Support 627:Support 621:Support 615:Support 483:on the 390:on the 301:on the 156:on the 41:B-class 2192:PPEMES 2043:Dumbox 1945:john k 1931:john k 1875:john k 1790:Howard 1769:Stifle 1648:Λέγετε 1587:Wetman 1509:Wetman 1138:Would 1000:(talk) 957:Voting 847:Wetman 699:Nova77 673:Nova77 665:GhePeU 653:Wetman 641:Nova77 631:GhePeU 47:scale. 2111:moved 1046:can't 28:This 2334:talk 2315:talk 2293:talk 2260:talk 2214:talk 2196:talk 2124:qedk 2077:here 2060:AJDS 2047:talk 2009:talk 1994:talk 1972:talk 1949:talk 1935:talk 1920:talk 1879:talk 1849:talk 1823:talk 1800:Duck 1773:talk 1712:talk 1696:talk 1676:talk 1547:this 1524:from 1422:Fear 1408:Bill 1377:Fear 1314:Fear 1266:Lima 1246:Bill 1240:(no 1212:Fear 1140:note 1128:Bill 1098:Lima 1035:AnnH 965:Fear 936:Fear 911:talk 868:Bill 822:Bill 784:talk 758:Bill 747:and 596:talk 569:Bill 456:Rome 445:and 443:Rome 415:Rome 382:High 2287:. — 1795:the 1242:*in 1027:172 995:TCC 907:jiy 475:Top 293:Top 148:Mid 2348:: 2336:) 2317:) 2295:) 2262:) 2230:. 2216:) 2198:) 2190:. 2174:→ 2133:桜 2113:. 2094:. 2049:) 2021:— 2011:) 1996:) 1988:-- 1974:) 1951:) 1937:) 1922:) 1881:) 1851:) 1825:) 1775:) 1714:) 1698:) 1678:) 1619:-- 1480:. 1367:in 1304:in 1282:in 1278:in 1206:in 1204:. 1185:in 1090:of 1082:di 1077:di 913:) 806:. 786:) 740:. 598:) 563:, 550:-- 542:, 538:, 534:, 530:, 526:, 522:, 518:, 514:, 510:, 200:). 73:: 2332:( 2313:( 2291:( 2258:( 2212:( 2194:( 2139:) 2136:c 2130:t 2127:( 2119:) 2115:( 2045:( 2007:( 1992:( 1970:( 1947:( 1933:( 1918:( 1903:( 1877:( 1847:( 1821:( 1771:( 1710:( 1694:( 1674:( 1650:) 1646:( 1434:\ 1389:\ 1326:\ 1224:\ 1058:✉ 977:\ 948:\ 909:( 905:— 782:( 594:( 487:. 394:. 305:. 160:. 53::

Index


level-5 vital article
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Christianity
Catholicism
WikiProject icon
icon
Christianity portal
WikiProject Christianity
Christianity
the discussion
Mid
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
icon
Catholic Church portal
WikiProject Catholicism
High-importance
WikiProject icon
Architecture
WikiProject icon
icon
Architecture portal
WikiProject Architecture
Architecture
the discussion
Top
project's importance scale

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.